Re: [Evolution] Quoting Re'd Messages?

2002-07-17 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 13:14, Langsley T Russell wrote:
 Is there some way to set Evo so that it doesn't automatically include
 the text of a message to which one is replying? I'm on a number of
 mailing lists and most of then frown on this practice and I'd rather not
 have to remember it and delete it by hand each time.

I don't see a way to do it. It certainly seems like an appropriate
setting to have.

I'd think it would be in the Composer tab of the Mail Settings dialog.
It already has default forward style is:. A Default reply style is:
[inline, attachment, none] or something like that.

Does anyone know if there's an open feature request for this (or if
it'll be fixed in the next major release)?

--Ben



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Changing the Date format

2002-07-09 Thread Ben FrantzDale

Nobody has responded to this so I'll give it a shot. 

I thought this was configurable somewhere for all gnome applications, or
perhaps that it was based on the locale. Unfortunately, I'm really not
sure.

Can someone else answer this?

--Ben

On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 12:49, Graham Innes wrote:
 Hi Folks,
 
 Just a quick beginner's Q: I'm in Europe where the date format is
 DD/MM/ (as opposed to the American MM/DD/ format). How can I get
 evolution to use dates in the European format (DD/MM/)?
 
 Thanks for a great piece of Software!
 
 GDI
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Signatures?

2002-07-02 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 13:41, Langsley T Russell wrote:
 Hi all.
 
 I'm new to the list, new to Evolution, and new to Linux.
 
 When I was using Windows and Outlook express there was a method of
 adding preformatted signatures to an email. I could simply click on an
 icon and select which signature I wanted to use. I value this feature
 quite highly as I use a number of different signatures depending on
 whether I'm signing a professional correspondence, an email to a mailing
 list I'm a member of, a mailing list I host, etc. Is there some way to
 create a multiple signature file and have it readily available to insert
 a signature. 
 
 It would be handy if other blocks of text (things like URLS with brief
 descriptions) could be made similarly available.
 
 Is there any way I can conveniently do these things using Evolution as
 my e-mail client?
 

I don't think there's a good way to do this at the moment. You can
select a sig file for each mail account you have, though. Thus one way
to do what you want would be to make several mail acocunts, only one of
them setup for incoming mail, and each with a different sig. You could
then select the account you wanted to use from the dropdown From:
menu.

Again, this isn't perfect.

--Ben



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Sorely disenchanted with Evolution (looong)

2002-06-26 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 22:24, Frank Gore wrote:
 Over the past few months, I've slowly come to the realization that maybe
 Evolution isn't the ideal tool for my purposes. Perhaps someone here can
 convince me otherwise by pointing out what I'm doing wrong. 
 
...
 No matter how hard I try, I can't seem to ever be able to copy and paste
 things out of displayed emails in evolution (what some people call the
 preview pane). I've tried everything I could think of, but it never
 works. Shift-Delete, Ctrl-C, even Edit/Copy from the menu. None of it
 ever manages to copy anything. The only way I can ever get it to copy or
 cut text is if I hit Reply and copy the text out of the email editor.
 This is a HUGE drawback when I'm doing order tracking and need to
 quickly copy UPS tracking numbers into a spreadsheet or the browser.
 There's no way I'm gonna type hundreds of tracking numbers by hand
 everyday. And having to hit Reply to every email before I can copy text
 out of it is a pain. This has plagued me ever since the first 1.0
 release of Evolution. What am I doing wrong? Am I the only one with this
 problem?
 

I can't help you with the others, but as for copy/paste, what happens
when you just select to copy and middle-click to paste? (the standard
unix way.) I'm sure Ctrl-c and edit/copy should both work, but selecting
text in X11 should *always* copy it.

--Ben



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] text-mode shell anyone?

2002-06-24 Thread Ben FrantzDale

There's a wishlist bug suggesting this:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=26286

I agree that it would be a very good feature to have.

--Ben

On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 01:43, proXy wrote:
 Only a related topic...
 Would it be possible to write a panel applet similar to gnome's
 mailcheck, that used Evolution to check the mail. So all the mail
 downloads to the Evo mailbox(es), and when there is new mail in the
 mailbox(es) the little letter (or whatever) starts spinning.
 
 --proXy
 
 -- 
 http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
 linux.conf.au Perth 2003 http://conf.linux.org.au
 
 PGP Fingerprint http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/pgp
 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118  C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Evolution Problem

2002-05-15 Thread Ben FrantzDale

Last I checked there's an open bug about this. It's very problematic
when it happens and I'm sure it's lead people to think that Evolution
has eaten their data. Why not just (at least) have the warning dialog
give the user the option to kill the mbox.ev-summary file and regenerate
it. I seriously suspect that many people have silently been turned off
by Evoultion because of this.

--Ben

On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 18:50, Not Zed wrote:
 
 rm ~/evolution/local/Inbox/mbox.ev-summary
 
 should do it.
 
 On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 06:04, Ross Pearlstone wrote:
  Hi Friends,
  
  I am using Evolution 1.03 on Debian Libranet 2.0.  While applying
  filters to my inbox I had a system freeze. Had to reboot. Lost most of
  my mail and get an error message as follows: 
  
  Error while 'Storing folder 'home/ross/evoluyion/local/Inbox:
  Summary and mismatch, even after a sync
  
  Can anybody me repair this break
  
  Cheers
  
  Ross
  -- 
  --
   _ _  _ __  _  _  _| __|_ _  _  _ _ _   _ _  _ _   
  | (_)_\_\ @ |_)(/_(_|| |_\ | (_)| )(/_(_)_\(_|.(_(_)| | ) 
  | 
  --  
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Very frequent Evo freezes

2002-05-03 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I have been having problems with Evolution grabbing my mouse related to
clicking on mails, I think. I wouldn't call it a freeze, though...
Eventually I usually could get it to go back (by clicking aimlessly on
things that change the mouse coursor) but occasionally I'd have to do a
killev.

--Ben

On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 16:20, Not Zed wrote:
 
 Its pretty unlikely multiple threads are accessing gtk/etc, we know its
 not thread safe, so are very careful about using it (as much a mess as
 it makes of the code).
 
 Is anyone else experiencing this?  I'm definetly not getting it (yet) -
 I very infrequently update gtk/etc though.
 
 gdb seems to be playing up too, perhaps try cvs gdb?  Not really sure
 ...
 
 
 On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 00:58, Xavier Bestel wrote:
  Le dim 28/04/2002 à 17:09, Owen Taylor a écrit :
   
   Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
Le dim 28/04/2002 à 16:23, Xavier Bestel a écrit :
 Hi,
 
 since a few days, Evo freezes very very often. This happens when I click
 (or select with keyboard) a mail in the list. Not always, not always the
 same.
 
 I tried running gdb evolution-mail in a terminal, but it exited at the
 freeze (Program exited). There were still evolution-mail threads
 present, apparently all stuck in select() or so.

Ok, galeon seems to have the same problem, less frequent.
The common pattern is, when I attach gdb to the main (frozen) thread:
they both freeze in a X function, like this:

#0  0x4097a7ce in select () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x40273fdc in _XlcPublicMethods () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#2  0x401cf3ba in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#3  0x401cfdc3 in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#4  0x401cba77 in XSync () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#5  0x40041150 in gdk_superwin_scroll () from /usr/lib/libgtksuperwin.so

Not always the same function, but top 2 are always select() and
_XlcPublicMethods() ... 
   
   the _XlcPublicMethods thing is just an artifact of not having
   symbols for Xlib.
   
now I'm a bit lost, who should I address that report to ?
   
   I'd have to guess it's an evolution bug; it's trying to use GDK from
   multiple threads without locking, and thats' corrupting X lib
   internals. (Probably the user from multiple threads is accidental)
  
  I don't think so, because it happened suddenly both for galeon and
  evolution. I suspect an underlying common package (e.g. gtk+, gdk or X)
  to be the cause. Unfortunately I don't know which ones have been updated
  lately.
  
  Xav
  
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Evolution] Public keys in vCards

2002-04-25 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I'm wondering if I should open a bug for the following:

The vcard format specified by RFC 2426 includes a KEY field for a
person's public key. This does not appear to be supported by Evolution.
If it were supported there are a number of cool things that could be
done with it, or with a key fingerprint field. (I don't know if there's
a standard vcard extension for a key fingerprint, but this seems just as
useful given online key distribution.)

If either the KEY field or a key fingerprint field were supported, it
would be extremely useful for establishing trust. With a PDA, someone
could beam you their business card on, then you could sync with
Evolution. Evolution could promp you have a new key(or signature) and
ask if you really got it from the person who claimed to give it to you.

--Ben



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Feature request (?)

2002-04-25 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 08:47, Andy Cedilnik wrote:
 Hello!
 
 I love Evolution as an e-mail client. It does most of what I expect the
 e-mail client to do. There are however some minor features I cannot
 find.
 
 Since I answer lots of e-mails with a specific template, I would love
 Evolution to provide this feature. For example, I would like to have a
 button/menu-option Reply From Draft, which would create a reply
 message with a draft message and the actual reply embedded somewhere
 inside.
 
 I would like Evolution to fill address book by itself. Or maybe even
 better, that it would auto complete e-mail addresses from certain
 folders. This way I would not have to add every single e-mail to my
 list.
 
 In search, I would like it to remember what I type in even if I change
 the scope of search. Right now if I type something and switch let say
 from message contains to sender contains, it clears the text.

I believe this is already in Bugzilla.

--Ben

PS
An alternate way to move down to the next autocomplete is ctrl+n.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Evolution] Pilot Link Finally Working!

2002-04-19 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I've asked this list several times (probably more than 5) for help
synching my pilot. After long last I got it working so I figured I'd
explain what was going on.

I got this IBM ThinkPad 600E in 1999. Pilot synch worked fine in Windows
but never once in linux.

When setting up the pilot in the control center, it would always act as
though the serial cable were unpluged---I changed permissions, etc. but
nothing.

It turned out that the serial port was disabled. The only way to fix
this is using a DOS program called ps2.exe which is available from IBM
as part of a self-extracting EXE, uttcpdos.exe. I was able to use DOSemu
to create a boot disk, extract uttcpdos.exe, and copy ps2.exe onto a
floppy.

Rebooting into DOS for real (not dosemu), running 
A:\ ps2 serial on
then
A:\ ps2 sera enable
[sic]
and then rebooting into Linux, everything just plian worked.

Some of this stuff is speciffic to a family of ThinkPads, but in
general, if your computer is acting like it's not connected to the
pilot, hunt around (I recomend google groups) and see if your ports
aren't disabled.

--Ben



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Evolution] dynamic auto-fetch frequency?

2002-04-18 Thread Ben FrantzDale

Here's an idea. If people like it I'll put it into bugzilla.

Motivation:
My mail volume is irregular. When a mailing list dives into a busy
thread, I can get a message a minute or more. Other times (like at 4AM)
I get a message an hour. When traffic is high I find myself hitting
send/recieve to see if there's new mail.

Solution:
Rather than having one frequency at which to check mail (eg: every 10
minutes), give evolution a lower and upper bound on mail-check
frequency. Once evolution has downloaded mail, calculate the current
message frequency: X messages per minute. Then check mail again in
min(upper_bound,max(C*X, lower_bound)), where C is some constant. This
would mean you'd predict to get C messages on the next check. The
lower_bound would keep you from hammering your mail server and the upper
bound would prevent it from going hours without checking.

Disadvantage:
It would make the dialog to control mail fetching frequency more
complex.

What do you think? Is this crazy or a decent idea?

--Ben





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Evolution] Outgoing server unchangable after send later

2002-04-04 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I recently switched my laptop over to using a wireless card. In the
process I found that I needed to use a different SMTP server, because
Evolution was giving me errors when I tried to send.

I chose send later on the messages I wanted to send, then figured out
what server I needed to use and selected it. However the messages still
wouldn't send. I think this is because the mail was still being sent to
the server I had setup when I said send later.

This seams like buggy behavior to me. If others agree, I'll file a bug
report.


--Ben





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Useability improvements

2002-03-23 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 14:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
 On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 06:20, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
  
 [snip]
  
  *) I switched from Balsa to Evolution. While Balsa has a
  Select Next Unread message button. I don't find this in
  Evolution. I really miss the button.. can you please implent
  this?
 
 Actions-GoTo-Next Unread Message

or just hit `n'.

--Ben

 [snip]
  
  But.. I still like Evolution. :) nice job..
  
 
 Thanks ;-)
 
 Jeff
 
 -- 
 Jeffrey Stedfast
 Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Hello, I'm a newbie

2002-03-19 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 21:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

AOL.com? I'm sory. :-)

 My name is Kyle.  I have minimal experience in C++ programming and would like 
 to become more adept at a variety of  computer techniques and understanding.  
 If anybody is willing, I would love to be informed about some sites that 
 include a good crash-course for the basics of encryption/decryption. Thank 
 you to anyone and everyone, and I'll stay in touch.
 -Glazz 

You probably want to look at the gpg faq page
(http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html) There are various books on the subject,
also, though I personally forget what the best references are.

--Ben

PS
For future reference, the Evolution-hackers list is intended for
discussion of the Evolution development process. All of the information
you are seeking can be found on Google; spamming unrelated/quasi-related
lists is likely to get you few responses.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Fwd: [Evolution] File attachments from commandline?]

2002-03-12 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I assume the RFC you are reffering to is 2368.

Although it's apparently not in the RFC, the following syntax is:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?[EMAIL PROTECTED]body=hello
as is this:
 mailto:?[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]body=hello

(Both from section 6 of the RFC)
Would it not be a reasonable extension to allow evolution to take
arguments of the following form:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?attach=/home/me/myfile.tex


--Ben


On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 18:51, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
 There is already a feature request about this. we have not yet
 implemented it because the mailto: rfc does not specify a way of doing
 this.
 
 Jeff
 
 On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 18:11, Jason A. Pfeil wrote:
  Has anyone been able to answer this question or should I put it as a
  feature request for Evo?
  
  Thanks!
  
  --Jason
  
  -- 
  Jason A. Pfeil[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Senior Open Systems Engineer  http://www.10East.com
  10East, Inc.  (904)220-DOCS
  
  
 
  From: Jason A. Pfeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Evolution] File attachments from commandline?
  Date: 08 Mar 2002 12:02:40 -0500
  
  How can one start a new message *and include attachments* from the
  command-line?  I know you can start a new message from the command-line
  with:
  
  evolution email_address
  
  But how can you actually attach a file, too?
  
  Thanks!
  
  --Jason
  
  -- 
  Jason A. Pfeil[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Senior Open Systems Engineer  http://www.10East.com
  10East, Inc.  (904)220-DOCS
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 -- 
 Jeffrey Stedfast
 Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Evolution] Unmatched vfolder on crack?

2002-03-12 Thread Ben FrantzDale

Recently my Unmatched folder has taken to smoking crack. I have a ``Mail
to Me'' vfolder which gets all mail to me. Recently, however, I have
found a *copy* of new mails to me in Unmatched. 

This makes no sense given that both are vfolders pointed at my Inbox so
even if Unmatched is including mails to me, they should at least be the
*same* mails to me, not coppies. However, after reading all mail not in
the Mail to Me vfolder, I had:

Inbox (9)
...
Mail to Me (9)
Unmatched (9)

with nothing else read.

Any thoughts?

--Ben





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Drag 'n' drop mailboxes??

2002-03-09 Thread Ben FrantzDale

Does this bug report cover it?

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5382

 Opened by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Stedfast) on  2001-07-24 16:57   Long
 Description

 users want to be able to drag  drop messages from the message-list to
 the folder shortcuts rather than just the folder-tree


--Ben


On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 00:31, Mads Randstoft wrote:
 Hello!
 
 Is there somewhere to ask for new features in evolution???
 
 Anyway here comes. I would like to be able to drag and drop mails
 between folders in the shortcut bar. So that I could be in, say, the
 inbox and by simply draging a mail to the shortcut bar and drop it in an
 icon for another mailbox it would be moved there.
 
 This feature should work just like the move to folder from the pop-up
 menu...
 
 -- 
 Codito, Ergo Sum
 -- Mads Randstoft
Development Engineer
Tellabs Copenhagen
 
 
 The information contained in this message may be privileged 
 and confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the 
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this 
 communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
 this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
 replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
 
 Thank you.
 Tellabs
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Drag 'n' drop mailboxes??

2002-03-09 Thread Ben FrantzDale

Never mind

--Ben

Opened by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mads Randstoft) on  2002-03-07
09:31   Long Description

I would like to be able to drag 'n' drop mails between folders in
evolution.

So that I can select a mail in a box and drag it to another box on the
shortcut list, and it would be moved there (as with the move to folder
in
the pop-up menu)

--- Additional Comments From Ettore Perazzoli 2002-03-07 11:36
---

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5382 ***

On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 18:51, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
 Does this bug report cover it?
 
 http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5382
 
  Opened by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Stedfast) on  2001-07-24 16:57   Long
  Description
 
  users want to be able to drag  drop messages from the message-list to
  the folder shortcuts rather than just the folder-tree
 
 
 --Ben
 
 
 On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 00:31, Mads Randstoft wrote:
  Hello!
  
  Is there somewhere to ask for new features in evolution???
  
  Anyway here comes. I would like to be able to drag and drop mails
  between folders in the shortcut bar. So that I could be in, say, the
  inbox and by simply draging a mail to the shortcut bar and drop it in an
  icon for another mailbox it would be moved there.
  
  This feature should work just like the move to folder from the pop-up
  menu...
  
  -- 
  Codito, Ergo Sum
  -- Mads Randstoft
 Development Engineer
 Tellabs Copenhagen
  
  
  The information contained in this message may be privileged 
  and confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the 
  reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an 
  employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to 
  the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
  reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this 
  communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
  this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
  replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
  
  Thank you.
  Tellabs
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
  
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] orthographic checking

2002-03-08 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 11:32, Rodolfo Pilas wrote:
 
 Can you tell me how to avoid orthographic checking?

Cool word.

Orthography Or*thogra*phy, n. OE. ortographie, OF.
   orthographie, L. orthographia, Gr. ?, fr. ? writing
   correctly; 'orqo`s right + gra`fein to write. See Ortho-,
   and Graphic.
1. The art or practice of writing words with the proper
  letters, according to standard usage; conventionally
  correct spelling; also, mode of spelling; as, his
  orthography is vicious.
 


Anyway, from the mail compose window, go to edit-preferences. (Or go to
the HTML preferences dialog in the Control Center. They are the same.)
Under the Miscellaneous tab, there is an ``Enable spell checking''
checkbox, as well as a language field. Change the language to `es', I
believe.

--Ben

 And how to change to Spanish checking?
 
 Tks!
 
 
 -- 
 
  Rodolfo Pilas   Quien los puso a estos tipos donde estan,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Quien los deja seguir en su lugar,
  http://rodolfo.pilas.netQuien los baja ahora de su altar,
  ICQ #17461636   Quien les paga para que hagan lo que haran
  http://xtralinux.org -=# Apocalipsis Now % Cuarteto de Nos #=-
 
   Public GnuPG key: http://www.keyserver.net 1024D/57153363 2001-06-02
   key fingerprint = DAAE 3246 3F7D A420 B7A0  48A5 D120 C773 5715 3363
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Evolution] Possible bug going to next unread message?

2002-02-24 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I think I have been experiencing a bug, but it's not always
reproducable. 

Sometimes I will click in the Folder bar on a VFolder with unread
messages, then I will click on a message in the message list, then hit
`n' to get to the next unread message in the list. When that message is
near the bottom of the message list, the focus will often go to the next
unread message, but the message list will not scroll down to show the
selected message. 

Any furter navigation (eg: up/down arrows or the `end' button) will
cause the message list to recenter on the focused message.

Is this a known bug?

--Ben



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Evolution] Odd Sent times?

2002-02-05 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I just got two almost identical emails one minute apart. The sent lines
look like this:

4:47 PM
Today 4:48 PM

I'm not sure what makes the Today part show up, but I'd htink either
both or neither of these messages should say Today, but not just one.

--Ben





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] Making evolution my default mail client

2001-12-19 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 15:46, Neil Hodge wrote:
 All:
 
 How do I make evo my default mail client in KDE?  I tried using
 evolution, but all I get is the top level app.  Thanks.
 
 Neil Hodge

I assume you mean you want KDE to open mailto: links with Evolution?

try this:

evolution mailto:%s;

Where %s is the email address you want to send to.

--Ben



msg04545/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Evolution] Send/Recieve command F9 v. F5?

2001-12-19 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I am wondering why F9 is the send/recieve mail shortcut key. It is the
only F* shortcut I know of that evolution uses. I know Outlook Express
uses F5 for this. Is there any particular reason to use a key other than
the one Outlook uses?

It seems like, if all else fails, copying Microsoft is the best way to
go in terms of making it easier for people to transition.

--Ben




msg04550/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] Retaining settings

2001-12-19 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I've never had this problem myself, nor have I heard of it.

Sory.

--Ben

On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 03:53, Neil Hodge wrote:
 All:
 
 I know I should not reply to myself, but I just wanted to ask one more
 time if anyone knows about this.  Thanks.
 
 Neil
 
 
 On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 14:42, Neil Hodge wrote:
  All:
  
  Whenever I start Evolution, it does not remember the view settings I was
  using the last time I was in the program (particularly the font sizes). 
  Is there any way to get Evolution to remember this information between
  runs?  Thanks.
  
  Neil Hodge
  
  P.S. - Besides a few small complaints, I love the software.  Palm
  synching was easy and fast, very nice!
  
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




msg04554/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] Send/Recieve command F9 v. F5?

2001-12-19 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 07:47, Dan Winship wrote:
 On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 05:36, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
  I am wondering why F9 is the send/recieve mail shortcut key. It is the
  only F* shortcut I know of that evolution uses. I know Outlook Express
  uses F5 for this. Is there any particular reason to use a key other than
  the one Outlook uses?
 
 Haha.
 
 Evolution uses F9 because that's what Outlook uses. (Except, as you
 point out, it doesn't. It also uses F5. F9 is synchronize folders.)
 
 -- Dan


Ahh. I see :-)

I'd never used F9 for Outlook. I'd just used F5 instictively. 
MS C++   F5=compile
Explorer F5=refresh
Outlook  F5=get mail

Now, of course, I'm happy to have C-x C-c be compile, Ctrl+R be refresh
and F9 be get mail.

--Ben




msg04572/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] Deleting emails

2001-12-17 Thread Ben FrantzDale

The circle-x button is the stop button---the trash button next to it is
delete ;-)

See Michael Leone's answer for more...

(It would be nice, sometimes, if tooltips were showed for greyed out
buttons to avoid people this sort of confusion.

--Ben

On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 16:31, Neil Hodge wrote:
 All:
 
 I can't delete emails (the little circle-x button is greyed out).  I
 can only mark for deletion, then expunge.  How do I delete emails?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Neil Hodge
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




msg04514/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] emacs style key bindings

2001-12-16 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 12:32, Eric Bourque wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I was surprised to find that the text widget in mail composition doesn't
 support the standard emacs key bindings. At least the basic ones like
 C-a for beginning of line, C-e for end of line. Instead these are mapped
 to select all and find regular expression.
 
 Are there any bindings for beginning of line and end of line? Can one
 change the current bindings?


That's odd. C-a and C-e work for me... I'd check the list of actual
bindings in the control center and make sure that those are in there.

--Ben



msg04479/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] Undo'ing searches...

2001-12-14 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I hate that too. The same thing happens in the analaogus fields in the
vFolder editor. I seem to remember putting that in a bug report but I
can't find it. Shall I enter a bug report?

--Ben

On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 15:07, Zot O'Connor wrote:
 On that thread, anyone else get annoyed that the field clears itself
 when you change criteria?
 
 I regular search for sender then realize I mean CC:, TO: and have to
 switch searches.  Evolution deletes the field... WHY?
 
 
 On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 12:07, Anna Marie Dirks wrote:
  On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 14:42, Sean M Alderman wrote:
   Is there an easier way to go back to viewing all messages in a folder
   than clearing the search criteria and hitting find now?
   
  
  Sean, 
  
  I can only respond to your first question. If you click on the Search
  button, a drop-down menu will appear. Clear is the first item
  in this menu. Selecting Clear will undo your search.
  
  Hope this helps!
  Anna
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
  
 
 -- 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




msg04305/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] vFolder question

2001-12-12 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 08:43, Jonathan Nall wrote:
 
 hello.
 i read the evo docs, but couldn't find the answer to this:
 
 when i delete a message in a vFolder, is it also deleted in the folder
 it really resides in? furthermore, if i expunge the vFolder what exactly
 happens? i guess in general i'd like a vFolder deletion primer. 
 
 thanks.
 nall.


vFolders are just saved searches. Deleting a message from a vFolder is
really just deleting that message. Similarly expunging while in a
vfolder is a general expunge. There is really only one copy of a message
which appears in a vFolder---it is just in the source folder.

I hope that was clear.

--Ben



msg04214/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] Is there a roadmap / future feature list?

2001-12-10 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 20:25, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
 G'day all,
 
 I've been 'toying' with Evolution on and off since the very early days,
 and in the last 3 weeks I've taken the plunge and started 'using' it -
 for everything. 
 
 Being an Outlook 2k junkie (wizard? ;)) there are of course things I
 like better about each program, but Evolution is the winner for now in
 my book. 

I havn't used Outlook at all. I'm curious what it has that Evo doesn't
at the moment.

 What I want to know, before I start firing off a list of 'would be nice
 if', 'could it do', 'what about' emails, is there a list of the features
 that have been requested somewhere?
 
 It would be extremely useful for non-gnome-programmer users like myself
 to be able to see if a feature suggestion has already been made - I
 guess it's basically a detailed roadmap of future releases? 
 
 And if someone's going to suggest Bugzilla, please don't make us submit
 and track minor UI improvements via Bugzilla - Evolution's strength as a
 program is that normal office workers can use it, such should be feature
 submission process ;)

The answer is indeed bugzilla. If you want to know what's been suggeted,
you can either ask on this list (often people are easier to query than
bugzilla) or search bugzilla. I'm not sure what a better feature
submittion process would be. (of course, you could always open a
whishlist bug entitled make it easier to submit wishlist items ;-)  )

Short answer:
* Bugzilla
* This mailing list

--Ben
 
 Great work so far anyway, I love it!
 
 -mike
 
 -- 
 Mike Cannon-Brookes :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com
  Supporting YOUR J2EE World
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 




msg04066/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] Bug in 1.0?

2001-12-05 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I get the same behavior.

--Ben

On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 00:54, Pavel Lisy wrote:
 When I try search any phrase (strings with space) I don't receive any
 result.
 
 eg. 
 
 in folder with message:
 
 -
 ...
 Pozor!: martin.metelka [EMAIL PROTECTED].
 
 
 V dopise, kter jste poslal, byl nalezen virus Virus. 
 Antivirov program jej zadrel a zastavil jeho dal doruovn
 na msto uren.
 
 Virus Virus byl popsn jako: 
 
 I-Worm.BadtransII
 
 
 Obnovte, prosm, databzi vaeho antivirovho programu nebo 
 kontaktujte co nejdve vaeho sprvce st (systmu), protoe
 ve vaem systmu je virus.
 ...
 --
 
 I search
  
 dopise
 
 and receive matched message, but when I try search
 
 V dopise
 
 I receive nothing
 
 It seams to be bug? Or it is feature? :-((
 
 The same behaviour is in vFolder searching.
 
 My locale settings is LANG=cs_CZ
 LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ
 LC_NUMERIC=cs_CZ
 LC_TIME=cs_CZ
 LC_COLLATE=cs_CZ
 LC_MONETARY=cs_CZ
 LC_MESSAGES=cs_CZ
 LC_PAPER=cs_CZ
 LC_NAME=cs_CZ
 LC_ADDRESS=cs_CZ
 LC_TELEPHONE=cs_CZ
 LC_MEASUREMENT=cs_CZ
 LC_IDENTIFICATION=cs_CZ
 LC_ALL=
 
 Any solution?
 
 Pavel
 
 
 
 -- 
 Pavel Lisy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 T-MAPY spol. s r.o., http://www.tmapy.cz
 Nezvalova 850, Hradec Kralove, 50003
 tel: +420-49-5513335 fax: +420-49-5513371
 
 O mapach vime vse: http://www.tmapserver.cz
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] bug in next unread message ?

2001-12-05 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I'm not seeing that behavior at the moment. Does this happen all the
time for you?

--Ben

On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 02:13, Stefan Palme wrote:
 
 hi all,
 
 maybe this is a bug, or I dont understand the behaviour...
 
 when I have a folder with read and unread mails (all visible),
 I can read one of the unread emails by clicking on it (of course).
 when I want to read the next unread message, I type N.
 
 when I at first did not clicked on the first unread message, then
 search wraps around when typing N and the last unread message had
 been reached.
 
 the (maybe) wrong behaviour is the wrap-around: when the very first
 message in the folder is an unread message, the wrap-around does not
 work properly - it jumps to the SECOND unread message in the folder.
 to go to the first of these messages, I have to type P.
 
 regards
 -stefan palme-
 
 -- 
 -
 Dipl. Inf. (FH) Stefan Palme
 
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 phon:  +49 341 3910484
 fax:   +49 1212 517956219
 -



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Ignoring changes with empty subject

2001-12-05 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I find the following 1.0 behavior to be a UI bug:

compose an email to someone (like yourself)
leave the subject empty
write foo in the body
hit send.
You'll get the empty subject dialog.
erase foo in the body and type bar instead.
Hit the send anyway button in the warning dialog.
When you recieve the email, the message body will be foo


Shall I enter this one into bugzilla?


--Ben


PS
You folks at Ximian rock. Evolution is great. I've opened sevaral bug
reports since 1.0, but overall it's a great piece of software!


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Features possible?

2001-11-29 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 12:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
 On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 02:27, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
  
  Here's a thought on an advanced UI for that... It's not perfect but I
  can't think of a better way:
  
  Execute actions [if logical expression is met]
  (a) Recipients   contains   foo
  (b) Sender   contains   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (c) Message Body contains   bork
  
  Logical expression: [((ab)|c)|(~bc)]
  
  Where the expression would be a text entry box.
  
  Any better ideas would be welcome, though. :-)
 
 This is how it already works... ;-)

Internally, or this is the plan for a UI?

--Ben great minds think alike FrantzDale


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Strange Vfolder in 0.99.2

2001-11-20 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I just upgraded to 0.99.2 and found a new vfolder I never created.

I've had a vfolder named East Dorm but now I also have one named East
Dorm voAIRJxv2384. It doesn't show up in the vFolder editor, nor can I
find it in my ~/evolution/vfolders.xml.

The voAIRJxv2384 part seems like an email ID used by evolution (I know
I've seen voAIR... before in that sort of context). However I can't find
anything with that id anywhere (though I'm not sure  how I'd actually
look for it.

The vfolder is empty, btw.

--Ben


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] 9-digit ZIP code idea

2001-11-16 Thread Ben FrantzDale

Thanks for the link. It's a shame there's no free/Free access to that
database. It seems like it aught to be in the public domain...

Oh well.

--Ben

On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 18:53, Brian wrote:
 The USPS would really not like such a thing happening.  There's an
 entire industry that sells such databases to businesses.  See the USPS'
 FAQ on the matter.
 
 http://www.usps.com/ncsc/ziplookup/zipcodefaqs.htm
 
 
 Brian
 
 On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 21:10, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
  I was just thinking, it would be nice if evolution's addressbook
  component could interface with the USPS's 9-digit ZIP code database. I'm
  not srue if there is a low-level access point to it other than the web
  interface, but it seemed like it could be a nice addition.
  
  Shall I drop it into bugzilla?
  
  --Ben
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] 0.15 comments

2001-10-19 Thread Ben FrantzDale


I have a few comments. Overall things are coming along great!

First: bug 10925. This should be easy to fix and not fixing it could
result in people believing that Evolution has trashed their mail.

Second: Somewhere along the line Search-show all  became search-clear.
I personally thought show all was a particularly clear lable and that
it isn't clear exactly what clear would do.

--Ben


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] couple of errors...

2001-06-20 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On 20 Jun 2001 12:10:08 -0400, Roberto Moral Denche wrote:
 Hello there!
 
 I got Evolution 0.10 up and running on my solaris 8 box, however I am
 getting 2 annoying errors (non-fatal).
 
 1: When sending an e-mail and try to type that @ in the To: Cc: or
 BCc: field wombat dies I still can send the e-mail without a problem but
 I get the gnome bug thingy telling me that wombat has caused an error
 and died.
 
 2: I leave evolution up and running all the time due to my work (24 hrs
 a day) I am running in to a problem when I get to work on the morning
 and I have 300 windows from Evolution telling me that it can
 stat/sumarize or movemail can't work because too many open files, I have
 many other apps up and running and none of them complain about this,
 sutting down all the apps but evolution doesn't fix the problem
 either... any idea?

I have a similar but different problem. I'm online douring the day but
offline at night. If I don't set Evolution to stop checking my mail I'll
end up with over a hundred identical popup errors by morning. It appears
that ``Work Offline'' doesn't work at the moment and that that should
help. Still, Evolution shouldn't be giving the user redundant errors in
general.

--Ben

 thanks for your time.
 
 - 
 
 ==
 | Roberto Moral Denche   |   |
 | UNIX Systems Administrator | It might look like I'm standing motionless|
 | Susquehanna Partners, GP.  | but I'm actively waiting for my problems  |
 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | to go away|
 | 1 610 617 2813 |  - Scott Adams -  |
 ==
 | This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the  |
 | individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are|
 | solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of   |
 | Susquehanna Partners GP. If you are not the intended recipient, be |
 | be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use,|
 | dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is   |
 | strictly prohibited.   |
 ==
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



RE: [Evolution] 2 issues

2001-06-12 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On 11 Jun 2001 11:56:04 +0100, Jim Bowen wrote:
 
 On 11-Jun-2001 Jon Nall wrote:
  
  1. in a compose window, if i tab from To - Cc - Subject -
  From, it would be nice if the message body was included in the
  cycle
  between Subject and From.
 
 How do you then type a TAB character into an email?
 

As others have already said, you'd hit tab. Tab wouldn't get you out of
the main email window. 

However I'd suggest that shift+tab should get you back to the subject
entry.

--Ben


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution-hackers] Import Dialog Nitpick UI Suggestion

2001-06-06 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On 06 Jun 2001 09:30:26 -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote:
 Ben FrantzDale wrote:
  
  I see the potential confusion but I believe there is a concerted effort
  to move from OK/Cancel or Yes/No buttons to more descriptive words like
  Import, save, etc. In this case I'd think Import/Don't Import would
  be best.
 
 I think this is a bad idea.  Like, a bad idea on the order of, not being
 consistent about whether yes/OK is on the left or on the right.
 
 Here's one way to do things: all dialog boxes ask you a question.
 It's a yes/no question.  The buttons say yes/no, ok/cancel, whatever
 the custom is.
 
 Here's another way to do things: dialog boxes ask you a question, or
 make a statement.  Each button describes an activity to take.  Now you
 have to slow down and read each button, instead of just reading the
 dialog question and knowing that bottom left corner means affirmative.

On the contrary, now you don't have to read the question in detail and
then stop to think about wether OK will quit the program or save your
file (for example). Clearly ``Save'' will save and ``Don't Save'' will
not.

--Ben


___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



[Evolution] composer bug?

2001-05-10 Thread Ben FrantzDale

When in the composer window with the main text widget focused, when I
press ctrl+alt+[any arrow key], the scroll bar flickers between
highlighted and non-hilighted very quickly untill I click on the text
widget with the mouse. This happens every time I try. I'm using the Crux
theme.


--Ben


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Can't send mail: could not parse URL 'druid window'

2001-05-01 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I answered this a few days ago... have a look at the archives.

--Ben

On 01 May 2001 12:41:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I try to send mail, hitting the Send button yields the message:
 
   Error while 'Sending subject of email': could not parse URL 'druid window'
 
 I'm using the snapshot of Evo from today (although I think this snapshot is a
 few days old?).
 I'm on RedHat 6.2, using Ximian Gnome 1.4, with all updates from Red Carpet's
 Ximian Gnome and Evolution snapshot channels.  I have nearly all updates from
 the RH 6.2 channel.
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] can't parse url field

2001-04-30 Thread Ben FrantzDale

On 30 Apr 2001 10:56:02 -0400, Duane C. Mallory wrote:
 I know we've discussed this, but have we found a solution to the problem
 of getting the error can't parse url field when trying to send mail?

I believe the answer is yes. I think the solution is to go to
tools-mail settings-edit-special folders and then manually set the
drafts and sent folders (though you probably won't have to actually
change them, just explicitly set them.) I think you may have to restart
evolution after that.


--Ben

 Best Regards,
 
 DCM
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution