RE: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 23:02, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote: > There's no reason why the same method wouldn't work for emacs. I guess I thought > that most emacs users run a mail client _inside_ of emacs, and wouldn't > be interested in evolution at all. :) heh :-) who want's to run an OS inside a mail client not to count what takes longer to load.. evolution or emacs :) -- Name: Ali Akcaagac Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science E-Mail..: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW.: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
RE: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution
There's no reason why the same method wouldn't work for emacs. I guess I thought that most emacs users run a mail client _inside_ of emacs, and wouldn't be interested in evolution at all. :) On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:30, Jeremy Wise wrote: > > Big woo... Where's the emacs version? Why do we need Vi[m] anymore?? > > > Just kidding... This bonobo thing is getting kinda cool :) Nice work. > > Later, > > Jeremy Wise > GnomeICU Author > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Stedfast > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:16 PM > To: Jason D. Hildebrand > Cc: Evolution Hackers > Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for > evolution > > > Awesome! ;-) > > Jeff > > On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:58, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote: > > I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to > the stage where > > others may be interested in taking a look. > > > > I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and > implements part > > of the GtkHTML interface. It works with Evolution (if you hack evolution > a bit so that knows > > about gnome-vim). > > > > You can check it out at http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim > > > > I'd be curious to hear what people think about it. > > > > -- > > Jason D. Hildebrand > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ___ > > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > -- > Jeffrey Stedfast > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com > > > ___ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > -- Jason D. Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution
Awesome! ;-) Jeff On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:58, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote: > I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage >where > others may be interested in taking a look. > > I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implements >part > of the GtkHTML interface. It works with Evolution (if you hack evolution a bit so >that knows > about gnome-vim). > > You can check it out at http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim > > I'd be curious to hear what people think about it. > > -- > Jason D. Hildebrand > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution
I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage where others may be interested in taking a look. I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implements part of the GtkHTML interface. It works with Evolution (if you hack evolution a bit so that knows about gnome-vim). You can check it out at http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim I'd be curious to hear what people think about it. -- Jason D. Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Post-1.0 PGP wishlist (was Re: [Evolution]pgp unusable?)
> I'm a US citizen, so I don't know if I can contribute code to this > effort. But if were legal for me to do so, I'd be more than happy to > help. 1) The old export restrictions were only on code that performed cryptography, and wouldn't have affected things like remembering passwords and deciding who to encrypt to. 2) The rules changed a few years ago. You can hack on opensource crypto as much as you want. -- Dan ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Post-1.0 PGP wishlist (was Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?)
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 15:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > THIS IS A BUG IN GPG! > > gpg tells us everything went fine, so Evolution has no way of knowing > that it didn't encrypt to all the recipients we told it to encrypt to, > thus it's not our fault. Yuck. There's actually several of these bugs, probably all in GPG. 1) Mail to people with unsigned keys silently encrypts to the sender only. 2) Signature verification of unvalidated keys shows a big success icon (but the accompanying text warns about the problem). 3) I *think* that e-mail to people without keys also encrypts to sender only. Anyway, I'm a fairly intensive GPG user, so I have a few features on a wishlist. All of these are security-related. A) The ability to save a passphrase for (say) 10 minutes without saving it indefinitely. This lets me read mail without endlessly retyping my (really long) passphrase, but doesn't allow me to accidentally save it when I walk away from the computer for a few hours. B) The ability to encrypt all mail to certain addresses by default. There are several people to whom I should *always* encrypt my e-mail, for security reasons. But every once in a while, I'll forget to check the box on the menu. Very, very bad. C) The option to encrypt all responses to encrypted e-mail. If somebody sent me something encrypted, it's presumably private. But if Evolution quotes the original message in my reply, and I forget to check the menu box, I'm screwed. I've convinced Mutt to handle case (B) and (C). But Evolution is much nicer mailer than Mutt, and I'd like to be able to use it without taking quite so many security risks. I'm a US citizen, so I don't know if I can contribute code to this effort. But if were legal for me to do so, I'd be more than happy to help. Thank you for all your cool PGP-hackery. Cheers, Eric ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] to be usable
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 16:44, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > > - why put a "--" before my signature? the signature in my signature file > > is my full signature and I don't would like to add an extra line with > > 2 dash! > > Because this is standard netiquette. The -- indicates the start of the > signature. from what i know its not just netiquette... its also painted in one of these so called RFC's but don't ask me which one :) -- Name: Ali Akcaagac Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science E-Mail..: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW.: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] to be usable
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 11:36, Levente Farkas wrote: > what I use. rh 7.2 with ximian gnome (everything from Ximian GNOME Desktop > and Evolution Snapshot) current verion: > evolution-0.99.1-snap.ximian.20040858 Latest Evolution RPM build to my knowledge is evolution-0.99.2-ximian3.i386.rpm > - why put a "--" before my signature? the signature in my signature file > is my full signature and I don't would like to add an extra line with > 2 dash! Because this is standard netiquette. The -- indicates the start of the signature. > there are many nice probaly useful feature in evo. but the > most important to help people to switch to evo. from other mailer. I have to disagree. The most important feature would be stability followed by standards compliance. Helping ease a user's switch from another mailer to Evolution is pure icing on the cake (IMHO). Jamin W. Collins ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
