[Evolution] Bug in Evolution Exchange 2.21.90/changed password

2008-02-01 Thread Thomas Novin
Hello

I just created a bug[1] in Bugzilla about a problem I got after
upgrading to Evolution 2.21.90 and changing my password.

Does anyone have a tip for a workaround? I have tried starting without a
network connection to really get it in offline mode but I cannot get it
to online mode because of a bug in Evo-exchange. It just says it cannot
find my mailhost (even though my network is back to normal).

1. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513646

Thanks...




___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] Applying filters automatically.

2008-02-01 Thread Steve Karmesin
OK, maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I think I'm following the
directions correctly and what I want still isn't happening.  Maybe someone
here can point out the issue.  I'm using Evolution 2.12.1 for Ubuntu 64.

I get a bunch of mail that I want to process automatically.  For example, I
get e-mails informing of every checkin to our SVN repository, updates on our
continuous integration process, and so on. All of these I want to go to
appropriate folders with zero action from me.  I don't even want to be told
that I have mail when I get these things.  I do this routinely with other
e-mail programs.

So, I set up filters to match on the appropriate conditions and send them to
the appropriate folders.  I test the filters using ^Y and yes they match the
messages and does what I want to them.  In the Account Editor under
Receiving options I check Apply filters to new messages in INBOX.

And nothing happens.  They still sit there, placidly filling up my inbox and
requiring me to type ^A^Y  to make them go away.

Am I missing something here?  What should I do to make the filters trigger
on new mail without user intervention?

-Steve
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Add new contact by programming

2008-02-01 Thread ritz
Hello

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 09:40 +1100, Daniel Kasak wrote:
 On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:52 +0530, ritz wrote:
 
   Is it possible to add a contact by programming(python)
 
  Probably this may help
  http://www.conduit-project.org/wiki/evolution-python
 
 Nice :) I don't suppose you know if a similar Perl interface exists?
Nope :( , afaik .

 
 
 --
 Daniel Kasak
 IT Developer
 NUS Consulting Group
 Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
 North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
 T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au
 
-- 
Ritesh Khadgaray
ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ
Desktop LinuX N Stuff
Ph: +919970164885
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Applying filters automatically.

2008-02-01 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 18:03 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
 Remember 'New' != 'Unread' - if something else (like a mail notifier or
 another email app) is seeing the email before Evo, then it is no longer
 'New'.  This is an IMAP function and nothing to do with Evo - Evo just
 asks the IMAP server What's new? and acts on the results.

OK, I'll bite ;-)

Evolution seems to take an incredibly sensitive view of what is 'New'.
The other mailers I have used will filter messages automatically using
the IMAP server at my institution, but Evolution flatly refuses. I
appreciate that Evo might be doing things properly, but if that stops it
working for the user, isn't that taking it a bit far?

In my case, our University computing people changed the IMAP software to
Dovecot recently. They use the 'snarf' Dovecot plugin to copy the mail
from the mail spool to the users IMAP INBOX when the INBOX is polled for
new messages. Overnight this stopped Evo from filtering my messages
automatically, but Thunderbird for example works as it did before they
made this change, and continues to filter the messages automatically.

G

 
 I see you're using a gmail address - if you are downloading your email
 from google using IMAP, then I can well imagine that something in the
 google system is 'seeing' your email before you do.
 
 P.
 
 
 On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 09:42 -0700, Steve Karmesin wrote:
  OK, maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I think I'm following the
  directions correctly and what I want still isn't happening.  Maybe
  someone here can point out the issue.  I'm using Evolution 2.12.1 for
  Ubuntu 64.
  
  I get a bunch of mail that I want to process automatically.  For
  example, I get e-mails informing of every checkin to our SVN
  repository, updates on our continuous integration process, and so on.
  All of these I want to go to appropriate folders with zero action from
  me.  I don't even want to be told that I have mail when I get these
  things.  I do this routinely with other e-mail programs.
  
  So, I set up filters to match on the appropriate conditions and send
  them to the appropriate folders.  I test the filters using ^Y and yes
  they match the messages and does what I want to them.  In the Account
  Editor under Receiving options I check Apply filters to new messages
  in INBOX.  
  
  And nothing happens.  They still sit there, placidly filling up my
  inbox and requiring me to type ^A^Y  to make them go away.
  
  Am I missing something here?  What should I do to make the filters
  trigger on new mail without user intervention?
  
  -Steve
  
  ___
  Evolution-list mailing list
  Evolution-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
-- 
%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%
 Dr. Gavin Simpson [t] +44 (0)20 7679 0522
 ECRC, UCL Geography,  [f] +44 (0)20 7679 0565
 Pearson Building, [e] gavin.simpsonATNOSPAMucl.ac.uk
 Gower Street, London  [w] http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfagls/
 UK. WC1E 6BT. [w] http://www.freshwaters.org.uk
%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Applying filters automatically.

2008-02-01 Thread Steve Karmesin
On Feb 1, 2008 11:15 AM, Gavin Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 18:03 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
  Remember 'New' != 'Unread' -


[snip]


 Evolution seems to take an incredibly sensitive view of what is 'New'.
 The other mailers I have used will filter messages automatically using
 the IMAP server at my institution, but Evolution flatly refuses.


[snip]

Glad to hear I'm not the only one suffering from this.

I would very much prefer the Thunderbird style behavior, and this one thing
may be enough to send me back there, in spite of not having the calendar,
tasks, notes, etc.

I'm connecting to an Exchange server and I'm connecting via IMAP.  Anybody
know if using the Exchange connection works better for this?

-Steve
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Applying filters automatically.

2008-02-01 Thread Pete Biggs

On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 18:15 +, Gavin Simpson wrote:
 On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 18:03 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
  Remember 'New' != 'Unread' - if something else (like a mail notifier or
  another email app) is seeing the email before Evo, then it is no longer
  'New'.  This is an IMAP function and nothing to do with Evo - Evo just
  asks the IMAP server What's new? and acts on the results.
 
 OK, I'll bite ;-)
 
 Evolution seems to take an incredibly sensitive view of what is 'New'.
 The other mailers I have used will filter messages automatically using
 the IMAP server at my institution, but Evolution flatly refuses. I
 appreciate that Evo might be doing things properly, but if that stops it
 working for the user, isn't that taking it a bit far?

Depends.  To get a list of the 'new' messages (i.e. mail received since
the imap server was last polled), all it needs is an imap command saying
'give me a list of the new messages', then it just downloads those
messages.  To do anything else needs Evo to download every single
message header/flags and possibly body.  That's fine if you have 30 or
40 messages in your inbox - but when you have a couple of thousand, it
takes time.  And yes, you do have to download them all because you never
know what other application has changed a message to now make it
eligible for filtering.

Sure it can be annoying, but doing things another way can be annoying to
other people.  If all mail programs did everything exactly the same way,
it wouldn't matter what you use.

 
 In my case, our University computing people changed the IMAP software to
 Dovecot recently. They use the 'snarf' Dovecot plugin to copy the mail
 from the mail spool to the users IMAP INBOX when the INBOX is polled for
 new messages. Overnight this stopped Evo from filtering my messages
 automatically, but Thunderbird for example works as it did before they
 made this change, and continues to filter the messages automatically.

I don't know about the snarf plugin, but I use Dovecot without any
problems on my servers - as does our University mail servers.  To me, it
seems like a bug with the 'snarf' plugin if its not reporting as 'new'
things that actually are.

P.


___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Applying filters automatically.

2008-02-01 Thread Steve Karmesin
On Feb 1, 2008 1:58 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This issue comes up every week or two on the list, it seems.  It's
 obvious that Evolution is not behaving as people expect, regardless of
 the technical details behind it.  In situations like that we MUST either
 (a) fix the behavior to work as expected as much as possible, OR (b)
 document the situation so people can understand what's going on!


I would vote for A.  Just doing B would mean that I can quickly find out
that I don't want to use Evolution, which is an improvement over the current
situation, but I need A for Evolution to be useful to me.

Thunderbird does the expected thing and without a performance impact.  I
strongly suspect that it just uses different logic than relying on the
server to tell it if the mail is new.  If you're downloading a message for
the first time and it is unread, then apply the filters.  Or something very
similar to that.

If the server new flag can be turned off by a e-mail notifier program,
then it is just not the flag you want to use for this purpose.  Sure, it
would be nice and convenient if there was a simple flag like that to check,
but there isn't.  So do what all the other programs do.

-Steve
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Applying filters automatically.

2008-02-01 Thread Thomas Novin

On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 15:58 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
 This issue comes up every week or two on the list, it seems.  It's
 obvious that Evolution is not behaving as people expect, regardless of
 the technical details behind it.  In situations like that we MUST either
 (a) fix the behavior to work as expected as much as possible, OR (b)
 document the situation so people can understand what's going on!

Agreed. I think A sounds best since B wouldn't help me very much. I
suffer from this every day that I have to filter messages manually
because I have maybe read my email from a webmail client.

Can't Evolution just filter messages that is new to Evolution (not
caring about the status on the IMAP serer or other server).

Rgds,

Thomas Novin


___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Proposal for new feature

2008-02-01 Thread Thomas Novin

On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 14:41 -0700, Chris Worley wrote:
 I am personally disgusted by the top-post style of Outlook users.  It
 makes sure they only answer one question, and which question they
 answered (or what point you made that they responded to) is ambiguous.
  I cannot see promoting that barrier to communication.

You're missing the point. If let's say you are five people in a email
discussion at your workplace and everyone but you use Outlook, you can't
really switch the style of the email each time you reply. No matter what
you think is right, if that's the standard, you need to follow it. 

Right now I have my Evo at my work computer set to Outlook style and
since it's such a nuisance to change it, I hardly ever do. So if this
feature existed you would actually get rid of Outlook style replies, not
get more of them. Today, because I'm lazy, I often reply to non-Outlook
users with Outlook style replies because it's the easiest way.

Rgds,

Thomas

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Applying filters automatically.

2008-02-01 Thread Pete Biggs

 
 And we haven't even touched on the issue of multiple clients for the
 same server/account (say you read your mail from home and also from
 work), or what happens if your local cache is lost or corrupted.
 
And that's the killer for me.  I have 3 Evo clients I use regularly
(work, home, laptop) and a plethora of other things that I use when
necessary (Thunderbird on XP, webmail, outlook occasionally).   Two of
my Evo clients have full filtering setup, one has partial filtering, the
other clients obviously don't.  It would be a real pain if my Evo
instances filtered things that each one hadn't seen before rather than
just 'new' mail.  The only way I can see it happening is if Evo puts a
custom flag into the mail saying 'this mail has been filtered by Evo
already' - but that breaks my two-tier filtering: minimal on some
clients with full filtering on one.

I may be peculiar in my setup, but I would be mightily peeved if Evo was
'broken' to mimic what other mail clients do!

BUT - I do think it needs to be sorted out - I regularly answer this
same question on the list and it is clearly not intuitive to people.  It
may be an issue with particular IMAP clients or particular combinations
of setups, but it does need to be documented.

P.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list