Re: [Evolution] KDE vs. Evolution -- Keyboard input fails
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 12:50 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: I suspect that the patch won't work, since it relates to color management, and none of the problems I've reported have any obvious connection with color. If you like, I'll try to rebuild what's needed, which appears to be the gnome core + evolution and try to see what's going on. Hi, the patch is cleanly applicable to gtkhtml3-4.2.3, here's a scratch build for Fedora 16: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4127822 Even it doesn't seem connected from the outside, it can be connected inside. And since I built a test package for you, then it might be pretty easy to test. :) Be sure you've evolution closed when installing that package. Bye, Milan ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Avoiding automatic marking as read
Am Sonntag, den 03.06.2012, 22:20 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams: On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 23:26 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2012, 18:54 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 09:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: I never understood the need to remove those options, I also noticed multiple users asking for them, especially because those all are common options, which each sane mail client should have accessible in UI, not through registry (would you imagine any commercial application asking users to open registry to tweak such fundamental settings?). If we had usability testing we would have numbers how many users really change these settings. Unfortunately we don't have (...) Haven't we really ... Aren't we doing usability testing HERE nearly every day ??? No. List / forum traffic isn't statistically meaningful and contains powerful bias. That's not how I'd visualized things. But I'm German. May be, I misinterprete you, but I didn't mean the smooth traffic we produce here using evolution. I meant the experience people write about here. I think that's their attitude towards usability ? ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Need Help with evolution auto subject
Hello Our company uses e-mail client Evolution 2.28 operating system SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 11.4 We send a many correspondence with our clients and are mostly attached to the message files. How do I make when creating a new message from the context menu shell Gnome (Nautilus), (right-click on the file - Send) are automatically filled with the Subject, and it substituted the name of an attachment? Best regards Roman Shevchenko mailto:ad...@arka.ua ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Avoiding automatic marking as read
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 22:20 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 23:26 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote: Aren't we doing usability testing HERE nearly every day ??? No. List / forum traffic isn't statistically meaningful and contains powerful bias. Maybe, but this list is also the most direct feedback channel the developers have from Evolution users. Complaints here do get noticed. You do have influence. Squeaky wheels and all... Matthew Barnes ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Evo mail: explanation of old and new file system
I'm still not clear about the relation between the old file system and storage location and the new. And there doesn't seem to be any explanation of it in the user documentation for Evolution mail. For example, tho I thought I had successfully imported all the old mail, I now have folders that should have lots of mail in them but don't have any mail. Where can I find an explanation in lay terms of what the changes were and how one deals with them? It seems that suddenly Evolution started doing things differently and users were left to figure things out on their own. I understand that the mail is now stored in a different location, but there seem to be more changes than that--e.g., not using mbox any more. So it's not just that the location has changed--the whole layout of the mail storage area is different. So assuming I can find those old emails in ~/.evolution on one of my old backups, what's the procedure for moving them to the new format? Do I just copy everything from the old to the new? E.g. .evolution/mail/local/xLynnOld .evolution/mail/local/xLynnOld.cmeta .evolution/mail/local/xLynnOld.ibex.index .evolution/mail/local/xLynnOld.ev-summary .evolution/mail/local/xLynnOld.ev-summary-meta .evolution/mail/local/xLynnOld.ibex.index.data to .local/share/evolution/mail/local/.xLynnOld ? Maybe this is explained somewhere and I just haven't found it? Again, it would be good if this were in the user documentation--or at least a reference there to the problem and a good explanation. Thanks. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
