Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-13 Thread James Pifer
 Are you sure that you just haven't forgot to do Folder/Clean (or 
 Purge, I am not sure with the English wording)? IMHO, exactly in 
 terms of deleted messages on IMAP servers Evolution is much 
 better than Thunderbird, which is just clueless. Google for it 
 a little bit, but IMHO (and in the opinion of the authors of IMAP 
 protocol -- Mark Crispin to name the one) the right way of 
 deleting messages in IMAP folders is to mark them as \Deleted and 
 physically delete them only on purge. Of course, then you have to 
 have „View/Hide deleted messages“ (as Evolution has and 
 Thunderbird and I suspect Lotus Notes doesn't). See Thunderbird's 
 bug for that https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359281
 
 Matěj
 

I thought I did expunge as well, but the messages were still there.
Honestly I don't remember 100% though. If I move back to Linux, which is
likely as Windows is already getting on my nerves, I'm sure I will go
back to Evo. I will try it at that time.

Thanks,
James

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-13 Thread Matej Cepl
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:40:51 -0500, Caleb Marcus scripst:
 I prefer Evo to Thunderbird, but increased functionality
 in the Mail component is not why.

OK, so why?

Matěj

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 Tomorrow Fedora 8 will be released so I'll be able to upgrade and
 hopefully these issues will go away, but it's annoying to try and stay
 up with the latest Evo's only to find some missing funcionality for
 reasons that are not clear. Before anyone asks, upgrading to the
 Rawhide
 version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
 don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with
 Rawhide in the past.

In case anyone was wondering, I did the upgrade to Fedora 8 and none of
the problems I've complained about recently have gone away, to wit:

* Frequent freezes in the UI while composing messages.
* Other freezes while Evo contacts servers -- it doesn't seem to be
multithreaded in any meaningful sense.
* Complete non-funcionality of spam filtering (Bogofilter), which used
to work well and now doesn't work at all.

Caveats: 1) this is an upgrade, not a reinstall. It's not impossible
that some of these problems are due to this. 2) I'll be wiping my
Bogofilter database and starting again, just to see what happens.

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-12 Thread Caleb Marcus
non-Mail functions aside, I disagree with your statement that Evolution
is vastly superior when it comes to functionality. Thunderbird now has
the equivalent of vFolders (search folders) and is far more customizable
in many ways. Beyond that, it has a huge library of extensions to add
functionality. I prefer Evo to Thunderbird, but increased functionality
in the Mail component is not why.
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:22 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:

 On 2007-11-07, 17:37 GMT, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
  No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo 
  works for some people most of the time and for other people not 
  so much.
 
 I think we should admit the honest truth that Evolution is less 
 reliable comparing to my previous kMail (and probably also 
 comparing to Thunderbird, but I have less experience with that -- 
 although I have to admit that some of that experience was pretty 
 horrible, including data loss). On the other comparing to other 
 two, it is vastly superior in amount of functionality. Have you 
 tried vFolders with kmail?
 
 Matěj
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On 2007-11-07, 17:27 GMT, James Pifer wrote:
 2) I also connected to my corporate mail (Lotus Notes) using 
 IMAP. When I would delete messages they would disappear or 
 become hidden on Evo, but if I used the Notes client the 
 messages were still in the Inbox. I also didn't seem to be able 
 to use Folders. Maybe there were settings that I could have 
 modified this behavior, but I did not see any. 

 Thunderbird handles both of these situations a lot better. The 
 trade off I think, is that Thunderbird is a little bit slower.  
 Good trade off for me since now I do not have to go back 
 periodically and cleanup my Inbox with the Notes client.

Are you sure that you just haven't forgot to do Folder/Clean (or 
Purge, I am not sure with the English wording)? IMHO, exactly in 
terms of deleted messages on IMAP servers Evolution is much 
better than Thunderbird, which is just clueless. Google for it 
a little bit, but IMHO (and in the opinion of the authors of IMAP 
protocol -- Mark Crispin to name the one) the right way of 
deleting messages in IMAP folders is to mark them as \Deleted and 
physically delete them only on purge. Of course, then you have to 
have „View/Hide deleted messages“ (as Evolution has and 
Thunderbird and I suspect Lotus Notes doesn't). See Thunderbird's 
bug for that https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359281

Matěj

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-08 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 13:42 +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
 
  I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
  it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
  In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
  initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
  suffer the most, is that the case?  
 
 Seems like it might be.  I've been using Evolution for a long time also
 and found it very stable until we moved to Exchange.  Not only does
 Evolution crash more often it generates a bug report on just about every
 exit (and has a acquired a few other annoying habits like multiple
 password prompts).  

Just to reiterate: I can't speak to stability problems with Exchange,
but I get stability problems anyway and I've never used Exchange in any
shape or form.

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-08 Thread Wendell Mackenzie
and stop displaying that annoying message dialog when it does the server
check for messages...

just display a small progress bar in the bottom portion of the window
with a cancel operation button.

jm2cts.
Wendell

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 17:43 -0500, Caleb Marcus wrote:

 One thing that's always bothered me about Evo is that when it's
 checking folders or refreshing something, or otherwise connecting to
 the IMAP server, it refuses to download messages when I click them
 until it's done or I stop it manually... it seems that in the interest
 of usability, Evo should prioritize viewing new messages, and cancel
 the current synchronization operation (or somehow multitask) when the
 user tries to view a message.
 On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:39 -0500, Chris Williams wrote: 
 
  On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
   On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.
   
   No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo works for
   some people most of the time and for other people not so much. Evo in
   all its incarnations has had variable levels of reliability for me, on
   two different machines, always using Fedora and KDE. The distro packages
   have I think been more reliable than self-compiled versions, which might
   mean something. Right now I'm using a self-compiled 2.12.1 on F7 with
   all distro updates installed and the entire UI freezes every few seconds
   when I'm typing, when changing folders, and when (apparently) contacting
   the IMAP server, plus evolution-alarm-notify sometimes eats 100% of CPU
   and has to be killed (I notice because I monitor my CPU temperature!).
  
  Oh, definitely.  As a (non-Evo) developer, I do value consistency and I
  have to agree that I haven't always seen that with this product.  I
  certainly didn't meant to imply that Evo has no problems at all.  In
  fact, a lot of distro upgrades were solely because of bugs/quirks or
  inability to upgrade because of all the Gnome dependencies.  I will
  agree that I probably have an extra level of stability through the use
  of distro packaging.  I will easily admit I went to distro-only
  packaging because of many of the quirks I encountered while using the
  real releases.
  
   On a different note, my junk filters simnply do not work at all (they do
   with the distro package). I've tried SA and Bogofilter and they are
   never automatically activated (I'm tracking them with a log file).
  
  I see occasional problems with filters as well, and junk filtering does
  seem to work sometimes while not others. Frustrating.
  
   Tomorrow Fedora 8 will be released so I'll be able to upgrade and
   hopefully these issues will go away, but it's annoying to try and stay
   up with the latest Evo's only to find some missing funcionality for
   reasons that are not clear. Before anyone asks, upgrading to the Rawhide
   version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
   don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with Rawhide
   in the past.
  
  Good luck with the upgrade.  I saw many improvements moving from
  Ubuntu's 2.10 to 2.12 packages.
  
  --chris
  
  ___
  Evolution-list mailing list
  Evolution-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

 






 
Wendell MacKenzie
System Engineer 
Phone: 613.782.5736 
Mobile:  416.997.7934
IM/other: mackendw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

BEA
Systems, Inc.
Corporate Office, USA 
2315
North First Street 
San
Jose, CA 95131 
Fax:
408.570.8901
www.bea.com


 
The
2
most
important rules in life:: 1. Don't tell everything you know

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain 
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated 
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally 
privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received 
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete 
it.___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-08 Thread Caleb Marcus
If you use the button to manually check for messages, then the detailed
dialog box makes a lot of sense. However, you can set it to
automatically check every so often, and it won't display the dialog box
then.
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 07:46 -0500, Wendell Mackenzie wrote:

 and stop displaying that annoying message dialog when it does the
 server check for messages...
 
 just display a small progress bar in the bottom portion of the window
 with a cancel operation button.
 
 jm2cts.
 Wendell
 
 On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 17:43 -0500, Caleb Marcus wrote:
 
  One thing that's always bothered me about Evo is that when it's
  checking folders or refreshing something, or otherwise connecting to
  the IMAP server, it refuses to download messages when I click them
  until it's done or I stop it manually... it seems that in the
  interest of usability, Evo should prioritize viewing new messages,
  and cancel the current synchronization operation (or somehow
  multitask) when the user tries to view a message.
  On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:39 -0500, Chris Williams wrote: 
  
   On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
 Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and 
 occasionally a
 Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
 cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.

No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo works for
some people most of the time and for other people not so much. Evo in
all its incarnations has had variable levels of reliability for me, on
two different machines, always using Fedora and KDE. The distro packages
have I think been more reliable than self-compiled versions, which might
mean something. Right now I'm using a self-compiled 2.12.1 on F7 with
all distro updates installed and the entire UI freezes every few seconds
when I'm typing, when changing folders, and when (apparently) contacting
the IMAP server, plus evolution-alarm-notify sometimes eats 100% of CPU
and has to be killed (I notice because I monitor my CPU temperature!).
   
   Oh, definitely.  As a (non-Evo) developer, I do value consistency and I
   have to agree that I haven't always seen that with this product.  I
   certainly didn't meant to imply that Evo has no problems at all.  In
   fact, a lot of distro upgrades were solely because of bugs/quirks or
   inability to upgrade because of all the Gnome dependencies.  I will
   agree that I probably have an extra level of stability through the use
   of distro packaging.  I will easily admit I went to distro-only
   packaging because of many of the quirks I encountered while using the
   real releases.
   
On a different note, my junk filters simnply do not work at all (they do
with the distro package). I've tried SA and Bogofilter and they are
never automatically activated (I'm tracking them with a log file).
   
   I see occasional problems with filters as well, and junk filtering does
   seem to work sometimes while not others. Frustrating.
   
Tomorrow Fedora 8 will be released so I'll be able to upgrade and
hopefully these issues will go away, but it's annoying to try and stay
up with the latest Evo's only to find some missing funcionality for
reasons that are not clear. Before anyone asks, upgrading to the Rawhide
version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with Rawhide
in the past.
   
   Good luck with the upgrade.  I saw many improvements moving from
   Ubuntu's 2.10 to 2.12 packages.
   
   --chris
   
   ___
   Evolution-list mailing list
   Evolution-list@gnome.org
   http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
  
  ___
  Evolution-list mailing list
  Evolution-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Wendell MacKenzie
 System Engineer 
 Phone: 613.782.5736 
 Mobile:  416.997.7934
 IM/other: mackendw
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 BEA
 Systems, Inc.
 Corporate Office, USA 
 2315
 North First Street 
 San
 Jose, CA 95131 
 Fax:
 408.570.8901
 www.bea.com
 
 
  
 The
 2
 most
 important rules in life:: 1. Don't tell everything you know
 
 Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
 information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
 entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
 legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
 individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the
 intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please
 immediately return this by email and then delete it.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___

Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
  That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable
  of the two clients. However, I put up with it.
  On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 
   Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal
   experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same
   platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo
   nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I
   see more problems :-)
 
 I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
 it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
 In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
 initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
 suffer the most, is that the case?  

Not for me. I don't have any Exchange accounts.

 Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
 Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
 cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.

No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo works for
some people most of the time and for other people not so much. Evo in
all its incarnations has had variable levels of reliability for me, on
two different machines, always using Fedora and KDE. The distro packages
have I think been more reliable than self-compiled versions, which might
mean something. Right now I'm using a self-compiled 2.12.1 on F7 with
all distro updates installed and the entire UI freezes every few seconds
when I'm typing, when changing folders, and when (apparently) contacting
the IMAP server, plus evolution-alarm-notify sometimes eats 100% of CPU
and has to be killed (I notice because I monitor my CPU temperature!).

On a different note, my junk filters simnply do not work at all (they do
with the distro package). I've tried SA and Bogofilter and they are
never automatically activated (I'm tracking them with a log file).

Tomorrow Fedora 8 will be released so I'll be able to upgrade and
hopefully these issues will go away, but it's annoying to try and stay
up with the latest Evo's only to find some missing funcionality for
reasons that are not clear. Before anyone asks, upgrading to the Rawhide
version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with Rawhide
in the past.

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Chris Williams
 That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable
 of the two clients. However, I put up with it.
 On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 
  Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal
  experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same
  platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo
  nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I
  see more problems :-)

I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
suffer the most, is that the case?  

Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.

--chris


___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Chris Williams
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
  Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
  Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
  cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.
 
 No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo works for
 some people most of the time and for other people not so much. Evo in
 all its incarnations has had variable levels of reliability for me, on
 two different machines, always using Fedora and KDE. The distro packages
 have I think been more reliable than self-compiled versions, which might
 mean something. Right now I'm using a self-compiled 2.12.1 on F7 with
 all distro updates installed and the entire UI freezes every few seconds
 when I'm typing, when changing folders, and when (apparently) contacting
 the IMAP server, plus evolution-alarm-notify sometimes eats 100% of CPU
 and has to be killed (I notice because I monitor my CPU temperature!).

Oh, definitely.  As a (non-Evo) developer, I do value consistency and I
have to agree that I haven't always seen that with this product.  I
certainly didn't meant to imply that Evo has no problems at all.  In
fact, a lot of distro upgrades were solely because of bugs/quirks or
inability to upgrade because of all the Gnome dependencies.  I will
agree that I probably have an extra level of stability through the use
of distro packaging.  I will easily admit I went to distro-only
packaging because of many of the quirks I encountered while using the
real releases.

 On a different note, my junk filters simnply do not work at all (they do
 with the distro package). I've tried SA and Bogofilter and they are
 never automatically activated (I'm tracking them with a log file).

I see occasional problems with filters as well, and junk filtering does
seem to work sometimes while not others. Frustrating.

 Tomorrow Fedora 8 will be released so I'll be able to upgrade and
 hopefully these issues will go away, but it's annoying to try and stay
 up with the latest Evo's only to find some missing funcionality for
 reasons that are not clear. Before anyone asks, upgrading to the Rawhide
 version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
 don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with Rawhide
 in the past.

Good luck with the upgrade.  I saw many improvements moving from
Ubuntu's 2.10 to 2.12 packages.

--chris

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Todd Ness

 
 Before anyone asks, upgrading to the Rawhide
 version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
 don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with Rawhide
 in the past.
 
 poc

I think that upgrading only to find new and different problems is
un-settling at best. Also, I am not keen on the fact that evolution is
so dependent on so many other packages, gtk, libsoup, etc. and the only
convenient way to upgrade evolution is to upgrade to a newer version of
your favorite OS. This is the kind of thing that prevents Linux from
making any ground in the enterprise for regular everyday users. Way too
much change and a lack stability. When I get newer versions of Firefox
or Thunderbird I don't have to upgrade my whole OS and should not. Just
a thought don't flame me to death over this it is just a suggestion that
if evolution could stand on it's own on a Linux platform that would sure
help.

And yes there are way more problems with the exchange accounts on
evolution than there are with IMAP or POP accounts. 
Filters are flaky on exchange, the whole exchange backend process dies a
lot. whereas my POP account just keeps working and the filters work for
it as well.

Todd
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread James Pifer

 
 I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
 it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
 In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
 initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
 suffer the most, is that the case?  
 
 Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
 Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
 cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.
 
 --chris

Evo is/was very solid for me. I've been using it for years. I still use
it now on FC7 for all my mailing lists. Only reason I moved to
Thunderbird on another machine is that it runs Vista instead of FC. 

I really only had 2 complaints about EVO. 

1) It did not seem to handle LDAP very well. Our LDAP directory contains
several thousand entries. I believe it was limited to the 1st 1000. I
cannot confirm that, nor can I confirm the EVO version I was running. 

2) I also connected to my corporate mail (Lotus Notes) using IMAP. When
I would delete messages they would disappear or become hidden on Evo,
but if I used the Notes client the messages were still in the Inbox. I
also didn't seem to be able to use Folders. Maybe there were settings
that I could have modified this behavior, but I did not see any. 

Thunderbird handles both of these situations a lot better. The trade off
I think, is that Thunderbird is a little bit slower. Good trade off for
me since now I do not have to go back periodically and cleanup my Inbox
with the Notes client.

Don't get me wrong, I really like Evo, and if there was a stable Windows
version I might still be on it. 

My $0.02. 

James

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Caleb Marcus
I've had crashes when I only used one POP account, and I'm still getting
crashes with one IMAP account... I should clarify that they're not
complete crashes per se, but times when it hangs for a while and can't
be closed without --force-shutdown.
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:

  That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable
  of the two clients. However, I put up with it.
  On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 
   Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal
   experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same
   platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo
   nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I
   see more problems :-)
 
 I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
 it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
 In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
 initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
 suffer the most, is that the case?  
 
 Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
 Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
 cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.
 
 --chris
 
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Caleb Marcus
One thing that's always bothered me about Evo is that when it's checking
folders or refreshing something, or otherwise connecting to the IMAP
server, it refuses to download messages when I click them until it's
done or I stop it manually... it seems that in the interest of
usability, Evo should prioritize viewing new messages, and cancel the
current synchronization operation (or somehow multitask) when the user
tries to view a message.
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:39 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:

 On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
  On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
   Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
   Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
   cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.
  
  No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo works for
  some people most of the time and for other people not so much. Evo in
  all its incarnations has had variable levels of reliability for me, on
  two different machines, always using Fedora and KDE. The distro packages
  have I think been more reliable than self-compiled versions, which might
  mean something. Right now I'm using a self-compiled 2.12.1 on F7 with
  all distro updates installed and the entire UI freezes every few seconds
  when I'm typing, when changing folders, and when (apparently) contacting
  the IMAP server, plus evolution-alarm-notify sometimes eats 100% of CPU
  and has to be killed (I notice because I monitor my CPU temperature!).
 
 Oh, definitely.  As a (non-Evo) developer, I do value consistency and I
 have to agree that I haven't always seen that with this product.  I
 certainly didn't meant to imply that Evo has no problems at all.  In
 fact, a lot of distro upgrades were solely because of bugs/quirks or
 inability to upgrade because of all the Gnome dependencies.  I will
 agree that I probably have an extra level of stability through the use
 of distro packaging.  I will easily admit I went to distro-only
 packaging because of many of the quirks I encountered while using the
 real releases.
 
  On a different note, my junk filters simnply do not work at all (they do
  with the distro package). I've tried SA and Bogofilter and they are
  never automatically activated (I'm tracking them with a log file).
 
 I see occasional problems with filters as well, and junk filtering does
 seem to work sometimes while not others. Frustrating.
 
  Tomorrow Fedora 8 will be released so I'll be able to upgrade and
  hopefully these issues will go away, but it's annoying to try and stay
  up with the latest Evo's only to find some missing funcionality for
  reasons that are not clear. Before anyone asks, upgrading to the Rawhide
  version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
  don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with Rawhide
  in the past.
 
 Good luck with the upgrade.  I saw many improvements moving from
 Ubuntu's 2.10 to 2.12 packages.
 
 --chris
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Andrew Greig


 
 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:37:39 -0400
 From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?
 To: Chris Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain
 
 
 On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
   That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable
   of the two clients. However, I put up with it.
   On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 
Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal
experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same
platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo
nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I
see more problems :-)
  
  I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
  it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
  In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
  initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
  suffer the most, is that the case?  
 
 Not for me. I don't have any Exchange accounts.
 
  Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
  Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
  cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.
 
 No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo works for
 some people most of the time and for other people not so much. Evo in
 all its incarnations has had variable levels of reliability for me, on
 two different machines, always using Fedora and KDE. The distro packages
 have I think been more reliable than self-compiled versions, which might
 mean something. Right now I'm using a self-compiled 2.12.1 on F7 with
 all distro updates installed and the entire UI freezes every few seconds
 when I'm typing, when changing folders, and when (apparently) contacting
 the IMAP server, plus evolution-alarm-notify sometimes eats 100% of CPU
 and has to be killed (I notice because I monitor my CPU temperature!).


 
 poc
 
Hi Patrick,

A few years ago I used to get freezing of the GUI and a stalled or
interrupted flow of text when typing.  One of the guys in a LUG that I
haunt, suggesting checking my network settings, especially the hosts
file. So apart from having 127.0.0.1 localhost
I added 127.0.0.1 andrew.Family.home  andrew  to the hosts file, and
everything picked up speed, and no more freezing.

YMMV

Cheers

-- 
Andrew Greig
Community Distributor
OpenOffice.org 
Melbourne, Australia  

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Ian Mortimer
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:

 I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
 it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
 In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
 initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
 suffer the most, is that the case?  

Seems like it might be.  I've been using Evolution for a long time also
and found it very stable until we moved to Exchange.  Not only does
Evolution crash more often it generates a bug report on just about every
exit (and has a acquired a few other annoying habits like multiple
password prompts).  

The Exchange connector also crashes sometimes so although Evolution is
still running it can't connect to the Exchange server.

A few linux users here have moved from Evolution to thunderbird after
being migrated to Exchange (which is ironic when Evolution is the only
linux client our Exchange service officially support).

Maybe things will improve when Evolution can do MAPI.


--
Ian
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 10:30 +1100, Andrew Greig wrote:
 
  
  Message: 2
  Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:37:39 -0400
  From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?
  To: Chris Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
  Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Content-Type: text/plain
  
  
  On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable
of the two clients. However, I put up with it.
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 
 Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal
 experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the 
 same
 platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo
 nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why 
 I
 see more problems :-)
   
   I can't be the only exception to this.  I've been using Evo since
   it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu.
   In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times.  My
   initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to
   suffer the most, is that the case?  
  
  Not for me. I don't have any Exchange accounts.
  
   Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a
   Groupwise account.  I guess I just wanted to comment that there are
   cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users.
  
  No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo works for
  some people most of the time and for other people not so much. Evo in
  all its incarnations has had variable levels of reliability for me, on
  two different machines, always using Fedora and KDE. The distro packages
  have I think been more reliable than self-compiled versions, which might
  mean something. Right now I'm using a self-compiled 2.12.1 on F7 with
  all distro updates installed and the entire UI freezes every few seconds
  when I'm typing, when changing folders, and when (apparently) contacting
  the IMAP server, plus evolution-alarm-notify sometimes eats 100% of CPU
  and has to be killed (I notice because I monitor my CPU temperature!).
 
 
  
  poc
  
 Hi Patrick,
 
 A few years ago I used to get freezing of the GUI and a stalled or
 interrupted flow of text when typing.  One of the guys in a LUG that I
 haunt, suggesting checking my network settings, especially the hosts
 file. So apart from having 127.0.0.1 localhost
 I added 127.0.0.1 andrew.Family.home  andrew  to the hosts file, and
 everything picked up speed, and no more freezing.

Fascinating. I'll try that, thanks.

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Bob Root
Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
systems.

Thanks

Bob
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Sankar P

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 15:27 +0200, Danie Malherbe wrote:
 Hi Bob,
 
 The only reason why I am sticking to TB and not Evolution is that I
 use 3 service providers...cellphone, exchange, and home DSL, so it
 is very easy to switch between the 3 SMTPs in TB (change which SMTP to
 use for sending your mail), it is just a tab/drop down menu with your
 choices (pre-setup). Just go to Edit, Account Settings... At the
 bottom of your Default Identity you can choose any of your setup
 Outgoing servers (SMTP). Just click on the down arrow and a drop-down
 box appears with your choices... select the relevant one and
 send/receive your mail on all your accounts. No need to remember all
 the settings for each SMTP (server name, UN, PW, etc.)
 
 Maybe you know of a way to work around this problem. This is one of
 the cons I guess...

You can create 3 send-only accounts i.e., receiving options will have
None and sending option will have your SMTP account details.

These accounts will be listed in your Composer. You need to keep the
account in enabled state though.

 
 Danie
 
 
 
 Bob Root wrote:
  Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
  Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
  Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
  systems.
 
  Thanks
 
  Bob
  ___
  Evolution-list mailing list
  Evolution-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
-- 
Sankar P
Harver's Law: A drunken man's words are a sober man's thoughts

 Novell, Inc. 
Software for the Open Enterprise™
http://www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread James Pifer
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 15:27 +0200, Danie Malherbe wrote:
 Hi Bob,
 
 The only reason why I am sticking to TB and not Evolution is that I
 use 3 service providers...cellphone, exchange, and home DSL, so it
 is very easy to switch between the 3 SMTPs in TB (change which SMTP to
 use for sending your mail), it is just a tab/drop down menu with your
 choices (pre-setup). Just go to Edit, Account Settings... At the
 bottom of your Default Identity you can choose any of your setup
 Outgoing servers (SMTP). Just click on the down arrow and a drop-down
 box appears with your choices... select the relevant one and
 send/receive your mail on all your accounts. No need to remember all
 the settings for each SMTP (server name, UN, PW, etc.)
 
 Maybe you know of a way to work around this problem. This is one of
 the cons I guess...
 
 Danie
 
 

I use both Evolution (on a Linux system) and TB (because I recently got
a new laptop so I'm using Vista until it pisses me off enough to go back
to Linux)

ANYWAY, both of them are easy to switch the service provider to send
your mail. When creating a new message both have a drop down in the
From: section that you can select any of the configured accounts. Maybe
I misunderstood what you meant. 

James

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Danie Malherbe




Thanks Sankar, I was thinking along those lines... good idea though!

Danie




Sankar P wrote:

  On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 15:27 +0200, Danie Malherbe wrote:
  
  
Hi Bob,

The only reason why I am sticking to TB and not Evolution is that I
use 3 "service providers"...cellphone, exchange, and home DSL, so it
is very easy to switch between the 3 SMTPs in TB (change which SMTP to
use for sending your mail), it is just a tab/drop down menu with your
choices (pre-setup). Just go to Edit, Account Settings... At the
bottom of your Default Identity you can choose any of your setup
Outgoing servers (SMTP). Just click on the down arrow and a drop-down
box appears with your choices... select the relevant one and
send/receive your mail on all your accounts. No need to remember all
the settings for each SMTP (server name, UN, PW, etc.)

Maybe you know of a way to work around this problem. This is one of
the cons I guess...

  
  
You can create 3 send-only accounts i.e., receiving options will have
None and sending option will have your SMTP account details.

These accounts will be listed in your Composer. You need to keep the
account in enabled state though.

  
  
Danie



Bob Root wrote:


  Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
systems.

Thanks

Bob
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
  
  

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

  



___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Danie Malherbe




Hi James, 

What you say is correct. But  :-) ...
you would already have set up all your accounts to use a specific SMTP
setting. So all you are actually doing when choosing the account to
send with, is which account information will accompany your email. If
you want to use say not your work SMTP, but your home SMTP, you would
then have to change the information...
:-( 

It would really be great to have this easy to switch SMTP function in
Evol that they are using in TB, I would then def. switch permanently to
Evol.

Good Luck with Vista... I switched to Ubuntu Feisty at the moment (I
have to much problems with my ATI graphics card in Gusty) and I am very
happy. I am playing with Windows in VirtualBox at the moment, as I only
have a few things that I still need in Wondows... (Endnote being one of
them as I need to CWYR).

Cheers
Danie



James Pifer wrote:

  On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 15:27 +0200, Danie Malherbe wrote:
  
  
Hi Bob,

The only reason why I am sticking to TB and not Evolution is that I
use 3 "service providers"...cellphone, exchange, and home DSL, so it
is very easy to switch between the 3 SMTPs in TB (change which SMTP to
use for sending your mail), it is just a tab/drop down menu with your
choices (pre-setup). Just go to Edit, Account Settings... At the
bottom of your Default Identity you can choose any of your setup
Outgoing servers (SMTP). Just click on the down arrow and a drop-down
box appears with your choices... select the relevant one and
send/receive your mail on all your accounts. No need to remember all
the settings for each SMTP (server name, UN, PW, etc.)

Maybe you know of a way to work around this problem. This is one of
the cons I guess...

Danie



  
  
I use both Evolution (on a Linux system) and TB (because I recently got
a new laptop so I'm using Vista until it pisses me off enough to go back
to Linux)

ANYWAY, both of them are easy to switch the service provider to send
your mail. When creating a new message both have a drop down in the
From: section that you can select any of the configured accounts. Maybe
I misunderstood what you meant. 

James

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
  



___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal
experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same
platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo
nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I
see more problems :-)

I also find the poor state of TB documentation rather disconcerting (and
I say this as someone who's always complaining about the Evo docs).

poc

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 07:20 -0600, Bob Root wrote:
 Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
 Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
 Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
 systems.
 
 Thanks
 
 Bob
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Michael M. Moore

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 07:20 -0600, Bob Root wrote:
 Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
 Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
 Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
 systems.


Funny, I used Tbird for years (first on Windows, then on several Linux
OS'es and OS X) before switching to Evolution last year.  Recently I had
occasion to return to Tbird for about a week, when in a fit of pique
unrelated to Evo I decided to rip most of GNOME out of my system.  I was
hard-pressed to remember why I had liked Tbird so much for so long.  I
don't mean to sound as if I'm dumping on it because I'm sure a large
part of my discomfort was just having to readjust to its quirks after
having become used to Evo's quirks.  But I guess I expected to feel like
I was returning to an old friend, and instead I found myself thinking
that's irritating much more often than I'd expected.

For me the principle advantage of Evo is the way it integrates into
GNOME.  Tbird feels alien outside of Windows (it feels especially alien
on OS X), especially when you like to do most things from the keyboard
as I do.  If you're not a GNOME user, though, it doesn't make as much a
difference, I guess.  I'm Microsoft-free, so all the Exchange stuff
isn't an issue for me either way; if anything, it's a little frustrating
to see how much of Novell's Evo effort goes to making Evo work with
Exchange.

I wonder about the future of Tbird.  It seems to be in an uncertain
state within the Mozilla Foundation, and one of its main developers just
quit.  In the beginning it seemed like Firefox and Thunderbird were
accorded near-equal priority, but at some point Mozilla started putting
way more of its eggs in the Firefox basket and the bird is suffering
some neglect -- not so much that it isn't still a viable project or
valuable app, but neglect nonetheless.

Anyway, I'm back with Evo, which I guess speaks volumes.


-- 
Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions
of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to
dream. --S. Jackson

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Caleb Marcus
In Evolution, I believe that every mail account can have a separate SMTP
server... just set the right SMTP server in each account, and you should
see a From dropdown box in the Compose window.
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 15:27 +0200, Danie Malherbe wrote:

 Hi Bob,
 
 The only reason why I am sticking to TB and not Evolution is that I use 3 
 service providers...cellphone, exchange, and home DSL, so it is very easy 
 to switch between the 3 SMTPs in TB (change which SMTP to use for sending 
 your mail), it is just a tab/drop down menu with your choices (pre-setup). 
 Just go to Edit, Account Settings... At the bottom of your Default Identity 
 you can choose any of your setup Outgoing servers (SMTP). Just click on the 
 down arrow and a drop-down box appears with your choices... select the 
 relevant one and send/receive your mail on all your accounts. No need to 
 remember all the settings for each SMTP (server name, UN, PW, etc.)
 
 Maybe you know of a way to work around this problem. This is one of the cons 
 I guess...
 
 Danie
 
 
 
 Bob Root wrote:
  Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
  Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
  Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
  systems.
 
  Thanks
 
  Bob
  ___
  Evolution-list mailing list
  Evolution-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Caleb Marcus
That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable
of the two clients. However, I put up with it.
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

 Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal
 experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same
 platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo
 nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I
 see more problems :-)
 
 I also find the poor state of TB documentation rather disconcerting (and
 I say this as someone who's always complaining about the Evo docs).
 
 poc
 
 On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 07:20 -0600, Bob Root wrote:
  Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
  Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
  Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
  systems.
  
  Thanks
  
  Bob
  ___
  Evolution-list mailing list
  Evolution-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-06 Thread Caleb Marcus
I recently switched, and I'm loving the integration with my calendar and
everything... you should be able to import all your old Thunderbird
downloaded mail by going to FileImport, selecting Single File, and
browsing over to ~/.mozilla-thunderbird/ and finding your mail files
(Not sure where they are, I deleted my Thunderbird folder.) You may have
to right click and check off Show hidden files in the file browser to
find it. As for contacts, you can export them in Thunderbird to a CSV
and re-import them with Evolution the same way you imported your mail
(make sure to select Mozilla CSV rather than Evolution CSV in the file
type box when you import the file.)
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 07:20 -0600, Bob Root wrote:

 Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To 
 Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of 
 Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op 
 systems.
 
 Thanks
 
 Bob
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list