[ewg] [PATCH] Change open-iscsi git url

2008-05-18 Thread Doron Shoham
Change open-iscsi and open-iscsi-rh4 urls
from erezz to dorons.

Signed-off-by: Doron Shoham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
 build_ofed.sh |4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/build_ofed.sh b/build_ofed.sh
index 3844314..856999b 100755
--- a/build_ofed.sh
+++ b/build_ofed.sh
@@ -100,10 +100,10 @@ ofed_scripts_branch=master
 ofed_docs_URL=git://git.openfabrics.org/~tziporet/docs.git
 ofed_docs_branch=ofed_1_3
 
-open_iscsi_URL=git://git.openfabrics.org/~erezz/open-iscsi.git
+open_iscsi_URL=git://git.openfabrics.org/~dorons/open-iscsi.git
 open_iscsi_branch=ofed_1_3
 
-open_iscsi_RH4_URL=git://git.openfabrics.org/~erezz/open-iscsi-rh4.git
+open_iscsi_RH4_URL=git://git.openfabrics.org/~dorons/open-iscsi-rh4.git
 open_iscsi_RH4_branch=ofed_1_3
 
 bonding_URL=http://www.openfabrics.org/~monis/ofed_1_3;
-- 
1.5.3.8

Vlad,
From now on please pull those gits from my account.

Thanks,
Doron

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] Re: [PATCH] IB/ipath - fix UC receive completion opcode

2008-05-18 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky

Ralph Campbell wrote:

Vlad, please pull one small fix for OFED-1.3.1 that has been
submitted and taken for 2.6.26.

git://git.openfabrics.org/~ralphc/linux-2.6/.git ofed_kernel


When I fixed the RC receive completion opcode, I forgot to fix UC
which had the same problem for RDMA write with immediate returning
the wrong opcode.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

diff -up a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_uc.c 
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_uc.c
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_uc.c2008-05-15 16:07:53.0 
-0700
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_uc.c2008-05-15 16:12:23.0 
-0700
@@ -408,12 +408,11 @@ void ipath_uc_rcv(struct ipath_ibdev *de
dev-n_pkt_drops++;
goto done;
}
-   /* XXX Need to free SGEs */
+   wc.opcode = IB_WC_RECV;
last_imm:
ipath_copy_sge(qp-r_sge, data, tlen);
wc.wr_id = qp-r_wr_id;
wc.status = IB_WC_SUCCESS;
-   wc.opcode = IB_WC_RECV;
wc.qp = qp-ibqp;
wc.src_qp = qp-remote_qpn;
wc.slid = qp-remote_ah_attr.dlid;
@@ -515,6 +514,7 @@ void ipath_uc_rcv(struct ipath_ibdev *de
goto done;
}
wc.byte_len = qp-r_len;
+   wc.opcode = IB_WC_RECV_RDMA_WITH_IMM;
goto last_imm;
 
 	case OP(RDMA_WRITE_LAST):






Done,

Regards,
Vladimir
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1

2008-05-18 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 03:00 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
 On 04:55 Thu 15 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
  
  I haven't seen any email yet to Vlad requesting it to be pulled into
  OFED 1.3 so I assume that is pending.
 
 I noticed that this was pulled without request.

Interesting; I missed that.

  Also, the release notes would need some minor updating now (renumbering
  and perhaps mention of additional bug fixes).
  
I think Hal was asking about OpenSM version bumping
and tarball release for 1.3.x.
  
  If this is not done, then how is this identified as different from
  3.1.10 ?
 
 1) by OFED version,

OpenSM version used to be sufficient.

  2) by git version suffix (but not sure it appears
 when OpenSM is compiled from SRPM).

Me neither.

  We're back to which OFED did the OpenSM come from and I thought
  the agreed direction was to get away from this as much as possible with
  tarballs.
 
 Correct, and this is how this will work with next major release. Unlike
 this OFED-1.3.1 is *bug fix* release, which should mean that only
 limited number of critical fixes should enter there.
 
 We probably will generate new tarball at end of 1.3.x cycle (since there
 are couple of changes already), but I will try to limit number of such
 releases by only one - don't see a dig value to put version bump commit
 on every single change.

I wasn't proposing this for every single change but rather one
coordinated with 1.3.1.

-- Hal

 Sasha
 ___
 ewg mailing list
 ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
 http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] [Fwd: [ofa-general] [PATCH 0/2] IB: Improve recovery from SM change events after takeover]

2008-05-18 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 17:49 +0300, Moni Shoua wrote:
 Hi Vlad,
 I have 2 patches for ewg that were released to upstream kernel (see below)
 The first was approved unofficially and I hope that the second one will also 
 be approved.

Why doesn't the second patch wait for approval/inclusion in Roland's
tree ? I thought that was the agreed upon process.

-- Hal

 Please add the patches (in attachments)  in kernel_patches/fixes under 
 ofa-kernel.
 
 thanks
 
 Moni
 
  Original Message 
 Subject: [ofa-general] [PATCH 0/2] IB: Improve recovery from SM change events 
 after takeover
 Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 15:25:24 +0300
 From: Moni Shoua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CC: Olga Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED],   OpenFabrics General [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED],Moni Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 The patches below improve the the recovery of the IPoIB driver from
 a faulure of  the SM and taking over by another SM. The purpose was
 to minimize the the time that 2 hosts with IPoIB stay remain disconnected
 after SM takeover event. 
 
 Here is an example that was viewed in our tests.
 One IPoIB host (client) sends a stream of multicast packets to another IPoIB 
 host (server).
 SM takeover event takes place during traffic and as a result multicast info 
 is flushed
 and there is a need to rejoin by hosts. Without the patch there is a chance 
 (which according to our experience
 is a very big chance) that the request to rejoin will be to the old  SM and 
 only after a retry join completes successfully.
 
 Our tests for IP multicast and unicast traffic between 2 hosts show that 
 without the patch there
 is a period of time of  up to 5  seconds  that that communication is lost and 
 with the
 patch the time decreases  to less than a second.
 
 
 ___
 general mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
 
 To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 ___
 ewg mailing list
 ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
 http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] the girl is looking for you

2008-05-18 Thread Jan Akers
Hello! I am bored this afternoon. I am nice girl that would like to chat with 
you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am using my friend's email 
to write this. Will send some of my pictures
attachment: me___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

[ewg] Can you add version 1.3.1 for OFED bugzilla

2008-05-18 Thread Tziporet Koren


thanks
Tziporet
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg