Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 03:00 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 04:55 Thu 15 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > I haven't seen any email yet to Vlad requesting it to be pulled into > > OFED 1.3 so I assume that is pending. > > I noticed that this was pulled without request. Interesting; I missed that. > > Also, the release notes would need some minor updating now (renumbering > > and perhaps mention of additional bug fixes). > > > > > I think Hal was asking about OpenSM version bumping > > > and tarball release for 1.3.x. > > > > If this is not done, then how is this identified as different from > > 3.1.10 ? > > 1) by OFED version, OpenSM version used to be sufficient. > 2) by git version suffix (but not sure it appears > when OpenSM is compiled from SRPM). Me neither. > > We're back to which OFED did the OpenSM come from and I thought > > the agreed direction was to get away from this as much as possible with > > tarballs. > > Correct, and this is how this will work with next major release. Unlike > this OFED-1.3.1 is *bug fix* release, which should mean that only > limited number of critical fixes should enter there. > > We probably will generate new tarball at end of 1.3.x cycle (since there > are couple of changes already), but I will try to limit number of such > releases by only one - don't see a dig value to put version bump commit > on every single change. I wasn't proposing this for every single change but rather one coordinated with 1.3.1. -- Hal > Sasha > ___ > ewg mailing list > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1
Hi Ira, On 13:28 Thu 15 May , Ira Weiny wrote: > I just sent a patch with a HOWTO for the PerfMgr as well. That could be > applied to 1.3 as well.[*] Hmm, is it really needed? PerfMgr is disabled in OFED build, so when one needs this it will be necessary to pull source tree anyway. Right, it could be extracted from SRPM, but I guess "latest and greatest" will be more useful then. Although it could be useful as promotion. Other opinions? > [*] Sasha, sorry for all the last minute patches... :-( No, this is not a problem :) Sasha ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1
On 04:55 Thu 15 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > I haven't seen any email yet to Vlad requesting it to be pulled into > OFED 1.3 so I assume that is pending. I noticed that this was pulled without request. > Also, the release notes would need some minor updating now (renumbering > and perhaps mention of additional bug fixes). > > > I think Hal was asking about OpenSM version bumping > > and tarball release for 1.3.x. > > If this is not done, then how is this identified as different from > 3.1.10 ? 1) by OFED version, 2) by git version suffix (but not sure it appears when OpenSM is compiled from SRPM). > We're back to which OFED did the OpenSM come from and I thought > the agreed direction was to get away from this as much as possible with > tarballs. Correct, and this is how this will work with next major release. Unlike this OFED-1.3.1 is *bug fix* release, which should mean that only limited number of critical fixes should enter there. We probably will generate new tarball at end of 1.3.x cycle (since there are couple of changes already), but I will try to limit number of such releases by only one - don't see a dig value to put version bump commit on every single change. Sasha ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1
I just sent a patch with a HOWTO for the PerfMgr as well. That could be applied to 1.3 as well.[*] Ira [*] Sasha, sorry for all the last minute patches... :-( On Thu, 15 May 2008 04:55:26 -0700 Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 18:34 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > On 17:19 Wed 14 May , Tziporet Koren wrote: > > > There is the seg-fault bug that was fixed by Yevgeny that we need. > > > > This single commit was applied to 1.3 branch. > > I haven't seen any email yet to Vlad requesting it to be pulled into > OFED 1.3 so I assume that is pending. > > Also, the release notes would need some minor updating now (renumbering > and perhaps mention of additional bug fixes). > > > I think Hal was asking about OpenSM version bumping > > and tarball release for 1.3.x. > > If this is not done, then how is this identified as different from > 3.1.10 ? We're back to which OFED did the OpenSM come from and I thought > the agreed direction was to get away from this as much as possible with > tarballs. At least in this way they would be consistent. > > -- Hal > > > Sasha > > ___ > > ewg mailing list > > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg > > ___ > ewg mailing list > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 18:34 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 17:19 Wed 14 May , Tziporet Koren wrote: > > There is the seg-fault bug that was fixed by Yevgeny that we need. > > This single commit was applied to 1.3 branch. I haven't seen any email yet to Vlad requesting it to be pulled into OFED 1.3 so I assume that is pending. Also, the release notes would need some minor updating now (renumbering and perhaps mention of additional bug fixes). > I think Hal was asking about OpenSM version bumping > and tarball release for 1.3.x. If this is not done, then how is this identified as different from 3.1.10 ? We're back to which OFED did the OpenSM come from and I thought the agreed direction was to get away from this as much as possible with tarballs. At least in this way they would be consistent. -- Hal > Sasha > ___ > ewg mailing list > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1
On 17:19 Wed 14 May , Tziporet Koren wrote: > There is the seg-fault bug that was fixed by Yevgeny that we need. This single commit was applied to 1.3 branch. I think Hal was asking about OpenSM version bumping and tarball release for 1.3.x. Sasha ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ewg] Re: OpenSM 3.1.11 for OFED 1.3.1
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: I don't think - nobody asked for this change in OFED, and I assume nobody tested it there, and 1.3.1-rc1 is already out. We have RC2 next week so you can still update opensm with bug fixes. Will there be another OpenSM release (say 3.1.11) available for OFED 1.3.1 ? Not sure, but we will see. There is the seg-fault bug that was fixed by Yevgeny that we need. tziporet ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
