RE: IMC and relaying
Detective work is a prerequisite to the job of IT support. Even more so in the world of online support. When you are asked Questions with only 2% of the relevant information needed to answer properly. Chirs being an MVP has defonate proven ability there. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying Also you would make a great detective your synopsis below is exactly correct. Now I made the changes and I get a 550 Relaying is prohibited error. I thought that removing the domain defined as inbound disallowed any relaying. Is that correct? If not how do you enable relaying, is that the fix? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:56 PM Subject: RE: IMC and relaying Ok... Then without knowing which way the traffic is flowing currently in relation to the original NDR and its munged domains. I'm assuming that these Exchange servers are in separate orgs or that there's no directory replication going on... Again based on the original munged NDR. If the customer's domain is domain.com, it should NOT be defined as inbound on the IMS, it should be defined as relay and then on the connections tab custom routing should be configured. As for outbound mail from the internal exchange server being routed out through the server outside the firewall... That's easy, just treat the internal server as if it were a normal client and enable routing as needed. Still, enabling the IIS SMTP service seems so much easier and more secure. It's not always just about giving the customer what they want, but giving the customer what they need. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying It's just for relaying, the one w/ the mailbox stores is inside. I don't have a option for sendmail, customer request What can I say. M$ loyalists. So there are no users on it. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:49 PM Subject: RE: IMC and relaying Mr. Q, Why is the box outside the firewall an Exchange server? Are there users on it? Is it someone else's Exchange server? Or is simply acting as a mail relay? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying It's a security issue, the relay system will be outside a firewall the mailbox server will be inside. - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:03 PM Subject: RE: IMC and relaying OK, I see what you want to do, I think now I am curious as to why you're doing it. Can you give specific details on what it is you're doing and why? I know that you want to relay mail from one server to another, but for what is what I'd like to know. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying I am trying to relay from 1 Exchange 5.5 system to another Exchange 5.5 system. Using IMC. Is that enough info? Any good resources on using Exchange as a relay? Seen a lot of docs on implementation and planning none on HOW TO Here is the error. did not reach the following recipient(s): '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:27:53 -0700 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=xxl=PX-EMH-020110261927VVWKJSQH MSEXCH:IMS:x:xx:PX-EMH-02 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:50 PM Subject: RE: IMC and relaying More detail please... You're trying to relay mail from Exchange to another server or vise-versa? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions
Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000
Who told you I don't believe them? The status for now is: No one ,yet, told me 'I have installed it on a test box, and it was ok/bad'. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday-Oct-01 00:48 Subject: Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000 The definitive answer: Test it yourself. You have knowledgeable people telling you not to do it, and you don't believe them. Pretend you're a professional and test it in a lab environment. I've never stuffed my cat into a coffee mug, but I've got strong indications from previous observations of both coffee mugs and cats that tell me he wouldn't react well. I'm thinking none of the other 4,000 people on this list have stuffed a cat into a coffee mug, and yet pretty darned near ALL of them have an idea that it wouldn't be good, without being able to quantify the EXACT point of systemic breakdown. If you don't believe me, stuff your own damn cat into your own damn coffee mug. Hello. An optional answer: Application that requires mapi client on the server. For example: FAX application, anti virus that doesn't work via AVAPI, BLB backup solution, and others, that I may not say in public ;-) Anyway, among many replies I got, none of them was an answer to my question. [snip] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
Thanks to everyone and MSKB[1], I now have backups that I KNOW are good. Next step now, is to learn how to fix Exchange. I know there are a few million ways to break Exchange, but what would be the best for learning the repair tools in a lab environment? The hardware stuff 'should' be straight-forward. Break it - ID it - Repair/ Replace/ Restore - Reboot. The software and DB corruption would need to be more careful to avoid getting into a 'Restore is only option' situation. Any Ideas? Thanks John [1] Q146306 - Exchange Server Backup Restore Procedures Q179308 - How To Verify Exchange Online Backups Q152313 - Using the AT Backup Command with Microsoft Exchange -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NTBackup Our bat file reads: ntbackup backup z:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\curly IS \\curly /b /hc:on /t Normal /l C:\winnt\backup.log ntbackup eject z:\exchsrvr is because we are a clustered enviroment, hence Larry, Moe, Curly, Curly being the virtual node, Larry and Moe are the actual nodes. Our only problem has been lately is that our store has exceeded tape capacity, and we have to click on OK the next morning to finish up the backup on the next tape. sorry, no haiku. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTBackup Iron Chef Haiku [1] Subtle textures not seen here And no steeenking rhymes ntbackup rules I should say in most cases Small vexing problem on just one server all drives don't go on one tape space not the issue when each drive is done wants new tape for the next drive command line follows ntbackup backup c: d: e: ds \\server is \\server /v /r /b /e /l d:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal /v verify /r restricts access /b backs up local registry /e log includes exceptions only /l backup log filename /hc:on Hardware compression on /t normal (full) backup not using the slash-a backup acts like it is there three drives specified /a Causes backup sets to be added or appended after the last backup set on the tape. When /a is not specified, the program overwrites previous data. When more than one drive is specified but /a is not, the program overwrites the contents of the tape with the information from the first drive selected and then appends the backup sets for the remaining drives. Exchange alone works Combination doesn't work Drives alone bite too NTSP6 Ex55Sp4 hotfixes as well makes no difference running comand line or bat any help out there? Thanks, Paul [1] in Japanese, the word haiku has 3 syllables = ha-i-ku deal with it -Michèle Sharik, October 26, 2001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
go find the disaster recovery whitepapers. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.asp http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery.asp Keep them close to your heart at all times. The methods there are like the Ten Commandments. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Never laugh at anyone's dreams. People who don't have dreams don't have much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanborn, John Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Thanks to everyone and MSKB[1], I now have backups that I KNOW are good. Next step now, is to learn how to fix Exchange. I know there are a few million ways to break Exchange, but what would be the best for learning the repair tools in a lab environment? The hardware stuff 'should' be straight-forward. Break it - ID it - Repair/ Replace/ Restore - Reboot. The software and DB corruption would need to be more careful to avoid getting into a 'Restore is only option' situation. Any Ideas? Thanks John [1] Q146306 - Exchange Server Backup Restore Procedures Q179308 - How To Verify Exchange Online Backups Q152313 - Using the AT Backup Command with Microsoft Exchange -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NTBackup Our bat file reads: ntbackup backup z:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\curly IS \\curly /b /hc:on /t Normal /l C:\winnt\backup.log ntbackup eject z:\exchsrvr is because we are a clustered enviroment, hence Larry, Moe, Curly, Curly being the virtual node, Larry and Moe are the actual nodes. Our only problem has been lately is that our store has exceeded tape capacity, and we have to click on OK the next morning to finish up the backup on the next tape. sorry, no haiku. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTBackup Iron Chef Haiku [1] Subtle textures not seen here And no steeenking rhymes ntbackup rules I should say in most cases Small vexing problem on just one server all drives don't go on one tape space not the issue when each drive is done wants new tape for the next drive command line follows ntbackup backup c: d: e: ds \\server is \\server /v /r /b /e /l d:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal /v verify /r restricts access /b backs up local registry /e log includes exceptions only /l backup log filename /hc:on Hardware compression on /t normal (full) backup not using the slash-a backup acts like it is there three drives specified /a Causes backup sets to be added or appended after the last backup set on the tape. When /a is not specified, the program overwrites previous data. When more than one drive is specified but /a is not, the program overwrites the contents of the tape with the information from the first drive selected and then appends the backup sets for the remaining drives. Exchange alone works Combination doesn't work Drives alone bite too NTSP6 Ex55Sp4 hotfixes as well makes no difference running comand line or bat any help out there? Thanks, Paul [1] in Japanese, the word haiku has 3 syllables = ha-i-ku deal with it -Michèle Sharik, October 26, 2001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
Hmmm ... Had not run across that yet. And here I thought I'd been checking out all the resources from the list. :-( Cool stuff in there and in the directory above it: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/ It maybe in there [only took a quick peek], but what I want to do is find ways to realistically break a lab machine that would mimic real-life problems that require the use of the tools in the whitepages and techniques. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] go find the disaster recovery whitepapers. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery.asp Keep them close to your heart at all times. The methods there are like the Ten Commandments. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Never laugh at anyone's dreams. People who don't have dreams don't have much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanborn, John Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Thanks to everyone and MSKB[1], I now have backups that I KNOW are good. Next step now, is to learn how to fix Exchange. I know there are a few million ways to break Exchange, but what would be the best for learning the repair tools in a lab environment? The hardware stuff 'should' be straight-forward. Break it - ID it - Repair/ Replace/ Restore - Reboot. The software and DB corruption would need to be more careful to avoid getting into a 'Restore is only option' situation. Any Ideas? Thanks John [1] Q146306 - Exchange Server Backup Restore Procedures Q179308 - How To Verify Exchange Online Backups Q152313 - Using the AT Backup Command with Microsoft Exchange -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NTBackup Our bat file reads: ntbackup backup z:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\curly IS \\curly /b /hc:on /t Normal /l C:\winnt\backup.log ntbackup eject z:\exchsrvr is because we are a clustered enviroment, hence Larry, Moe, Curly, Curly being the virtual node, Larry and Moe are the actual nodes. Our only problem has been lately is that our store has exceeded tape capacity, and we have to click on OK the next morning to finish up the backup on the next tape. sorry, no haiku. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTBackup Iron Chef Haiku [1] Subtle textures not seen here And no steeenking rhymes ntbackup rules I should say in most cases Small vexing problem on just one server all drives don't go on one tape space not the issue when each drive is done wants new tape for the next drive command line follows ntbackup backup c: d: e: ds \\server is \\server /v /r /b /e /l d:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal /v verify /r restricts access /b backs up local registry /e log includes exceptions only /l backup log filename /hc:on Hardware compression on /t normal (full) backup not using the slash-a backup acts like it is there three drives specified /a Causes backup sets to be added or appended after the last backup set on the tape. When /a is not specified, the program overwrites previous data. When more than one drive is specified but /a is not, the program overwrites the contents of the tape with the information from the first drive selected and then appends the backup sets for the remaining drives. Exchange alone works Combination doesn't work Drives alone bite too NTSP6 Ex55Sp4 hotfixes as well makes no difference running comand line or bat any help out there? Thanks, Paul [1] in Japanese, the word haiku has 3 syllables = ha-i-ku deal with it -Michèle Sharik, October 26, 2001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
Regarding #2, if you want to carry on a personal conversation with someone, then you don't post it to a discussion list. Not every participant herein can watch the list in real time and respond to personal queries. The nature of a discussion list is that everyone responds to anything if he or she can offer something. Now, as to Mr. Ely's suggestions, you should reconsider your hostility to his tough love because he's right on the mark. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator 1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her. Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her. 2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??! Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you call yourself a computer professional??! 3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did! 4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's not because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because: A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to listen to me. B) It doesn't want to spend money. C) It's not a high priority D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company to know what I'm talking about. 5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email. 6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my stuff well enough. I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in return was insult from you and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from others, except one person, who was actually trying to help me out. 7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems. Apparently, you don't follow this model. You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori is stupid and can't read. I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary for you. Call me what you want, think of me what you may... Fact still remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients. I more than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to dignify. Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash. Til then... PEACE OUT! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!! If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get it!!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again JackA$$!! If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to a PST file for? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator. It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right now, just to add hard drive! I'm looking to find out why is this happening? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server? And why oh why is it DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server? Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
RE: IMC and relaying
Post the unadulterated NDR, please. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying I am attempting to relay mail from 1 machine to another using Exchange 5.5. But when I set up a IMC server and send mail to it I get an Unknow recipient error. Do I need to create accounts on the IMC server to simply have it realy the messages to the Mailbox server. Thanks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB Users 1200 mailboxes 1300 No issues yet. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? IS = 14g Users = approx 300 Largest mailbox = 545,793k (and, no, it's not mine)[1] Oh, and Jason? Are you a size queen? :-) [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing. - -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious about the size of people's information store on exchange 5.5 and the largest mailbox Also: Does anybody know if issues when the IS get's really large or if a single mailbox get's really large? Total IS size: 18GB Largest mailbox 2GB No issues yet. Thanks - Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Multiple KMS in single ORG
I don't know how you managed that since Exchange supports only a single KMS in an organization. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Reyes Balderas Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple KMS in single ORG We have two KMS servers in our ORG. Can users from sites with different KMS servers exchange encrypted e-mail? How can you configure the KMS servers to do this? Using Exchange 5.5 sp4, Key management server, no certificate services used, matched the encryption types between the KMS servers. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC and relaying
May I suggest that you use the IIS Service that comes with the NT Option Pack to do relaying in the firewall. It's far simpler than Exchange and will do just what you want. If you're running MS Proxy, you can even run it on the same server. If you go down this path, then search TechNet for 8bitmime and implement the registry setting so it works right with Exchange. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying It's a security issue, the relay system will be outside a firewall the mailbox server will be inside. - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:03 PM Subject: RE: IMC and relaying OK, I see what you want to do, I think now I am curious as to why you're doing it. Can you give specific details on what it is you're doing and why? I know that you want to relay mail from one server to another, but for what is what I'd like to know. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying I am trying to relay from 1 Exchange 5.5 system to another Exchange 5.5 system. Using IMC. Is that enough info? Any good resources on using Exchange as a relay? Seen a lot of docs on implementation and planning none on HOW TO Here is the error. did not reach the following recipient(s): '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:27:53 -0700 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=xxl=PX-EMH-020110261927VVWKJSQH MSEXCH:IMS:x:xx:PX-EMH-02 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:50 PM Subject: RE: IMC and relaying More detail please... You're trying to relay mail from Exchange to another server or vise-versa? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC and relaying I am attempting to relay mail from 1 machine to another using Exchange 5.5. But when I set up a IMC server and send mail to it I get an Unknow recipient error. Do I need to create accounts on the IMC server to simply have it realy the messages to the Mailbox server. Thanks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAPI Client for Windows 2000
I answered your question shortly after you asked it. The fact that you chose to ignore it is solely your problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000 Who told you I don't believe them? The status for now is: No one ,yet, told me 'I have installed it on a test box, and it was ok/bad'. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday-Oct-01 00:48 Subject: Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000 The definitive answer: Test it yourself. You have knowledgeable people telling you not to do it, and you don't believe them. Pretend you're a professional and test it in a lab environment. I've never stuffed my cat into a coffee mug, but I've got strong indications from previous observations of both coffee mugs and cats that tell me he wouldn't react well. I'm thinking none of the other 4,000 people on this list have stuffed a cat into a coffee mug, and yet pretty darned near ALL of them have an idea that it wouldn't be good, without being able to quantify the EXACT point of systemic breakdown. If you don't believe me, stuff your own damn cat into your own damn coffee mug. Hello. An optional answer: Application that requires mapi client on the server. For example: FAX application, anti virus that doesn't work via AVAPI, BLB backup solution, and others, that I may not say in public ;-) Anyway, among many replies I got, none of them was an answer to my question. [snip] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
Didn't KMart sell guns? Martin - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB Users 1200 mailboxes 1300 No issues yet. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? IS = 14g Users = approx 300 Largest mailbox = 545,793k (and, no, it's not mine)[1] Oh, and Jason? Are you a size queen? :-) [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing. - -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious about the size of people's information store on exchange 5.5 and the largest mailbox Also: Does anybody know if issues when the IS get's really large or if a single mailbox get's really large? Total IS size: 18GB Largest mailbox 2GB No issues yet. Thanks - Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
I wont set foot in Kmart. Call me a snob, but I wont do it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Didn't KMart sell guns? Martin - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB Users 1200 mailboxes 1300 No issues yet. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? IS = 14g Users = approx 300 Largest mailbox = 545,793k (and, no, it's not mine)[1] Oh, and Jason? Are you a size queen? :-) [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing. - -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious about the size of people's information store on exchange 5.5 and the largest mailbox Also: Does anybody know if issues when the IS get's really large or if a single mailbox get's really large? Total IS size: 18GB Largest mailbox 2GB No issues yet. Thanks - Jason
Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
Snob! - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 11:29 PM Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I wont set foot in Kmart. Call me a snob, but I wont do it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Didn't KMart sell guns? Martin - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB Users 1200 mailboxes 1300 No issues yet. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? IS = 14g Users = approx 300 Largest mailbox = 545,793k (and, no, it's not mine)[1] Oh, and Jason? Are you a size queen? :-) [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing. - -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious about the size of people's information store on exchange 5.5 and the largest mailbox Also: Does anybody know if
Re: Exchange clustering
Even for EX2000? Thanks. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday-Oct-01 09:05 Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
Is even worse in exchange 2k. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering Even for EX2000? Thanks. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday-Oct-01 09:05 Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
because of the user limit or another reason? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Is even worse in exchange 2k. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering Even for EX2000? Thanks. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday-Oct-01 09:05 Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
Yeah... But do have you tried the new Big K stores? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I wont set foot in Kmart. Call me a snob, but I wont do it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Didn't KMart sell guns? Martin - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB Users 1200 mailboxes 1300 No issues yet. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? IS = 14g Users = approx 300 Largest mailbox = 545,793k (and, no, it's not mine)[1] Oh, and Jason? Are you a size queen? :-) [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing. - -Original
RE: MAPI Client for Windows 2000
I tested stuffing a cat into a coffee mug. I had to use 18 coffee mugs and cut the cat up into 126 pieces. It worked, but it was bad. Maybe if I used the big Starbucks coffee mugs I would have had better results. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000 Who told you I don't believe them? The status for now is: No one ,yet, told me 'I have installed it on a test box, and it was ok/bad'. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday-Oct-01 00:48 Subject: Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000 The definitive answer: Test it yourself. You have knowledgeable people telling you not to do it, and you don't believe them. Pretend you're a professional and test it in a lab environment. I've never stuffed my cat into a coffee mug, but I've got strong indications from previous observations of both coffee mugs and cats that tell me he wouldn't react well. I'm thinking none of the other 4,000 people on this list have stuffed a cat into a coffee mug, and yet pretty darned near ALL of them have an idea that it wouldn't be good, without being able to quantify the EXACT point of systemic breakdown. If you don't believe me, stuff your own damn cat into your own damn coffee mug. Hello. An optional answer: Application that requires mapi client on the server. For example: FAX application, anti virus that doesn't work via AVAPI, BLB backup solution, and others, that I may not say in public ;-) Anyway, among many replies I got, none of them was an answer to my question. [snip] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
There is that wonderful built in error in the core processor of Exchange in the active active cluster. It is just a waste of hardware. Getting a separate second server would be much better. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Strome Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 7:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering because of the user limit or another reason? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Is even worse in exchange 2k. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering Even for EX2000? Thanks. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday-Oct-01 09:05 Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
