RE: After 5.5 to 2K migration issues

[Ed Crowley]

Did you look at public folders?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: After 5.5 to 2K migration issues


Hello all -

 I have a real prolem here. 6 months ago I migrated 1/2 a 5.5 server to
E2K. All went well thanks to all the advise from this group. I took one
of two domains on the 5.5 server and moved it to a E2K system in a
different domain but the same forest. The other domain still remains on
the 5.5 box. I was going to move the old domain from 5.5 to E2K this
weekend, when I noticed if the old 5.5 server was down, users on the new
E2K system got a window that said "Please wait while the system
communicates w/ the old 5.5 server. We are using windows XP with OL2K.
Only some users are getting this error. I thought it was because some
users AD profiles had, .X400, ms, and .X500 connectors that linked to
the old servers. I deleted them, but that did not help. Can anyone
please give me an idea as to why this new server still communicates w/
the old 5.5 system and how to disable that communication?

Thanks, as always,
- John Q

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA & public folders

[Tony Hlabse]

Ooops I meant to say it can not be customized as in 5.5 Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: OWA & public folders


> Yes on the public folders.
>
> The logon page has been removed for E2K OWA. The look itself can be
> customized as 5.5 was. There are other things you can customize but
depends
> on what you are looking for.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:55 PM
> Subject: Fw: OWA & public folders
>
>
> > Can you access public folders from OWA w/o a logon in E2K?
> > & how? I don't see the pretty gold screen only a NT authenication log-on
> > box.
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA & public folders

[Tony Hlabse]

Yes on the public folders.

The logon page has been removed for E2K OWA. The look itself can be
customized as 5.5 was. There are other things you can customize but depends
on what you are looking for.


- Original Message -
From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:55 PM
Subject: Fw: OWA & public folders


> Can you access public folders from OWA w/o a logon in E2K?
> & how? I don't see the pretty gold screen only a NT authenication log-on
> box.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA & public folders

[Chris Scharff]

http://server/public or http://server/


-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr.
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 2/1/2002 5:55 PM
Subject: Fw: OWA & public folders

Can you access public folders from OWA w/o a logon in E2K?
& how? I don't see the pretty gold screen only a NT authenication log-on
box.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: OWA & public folders

[John Q Jr.]

Can you access public folders from OWA w/o a logon in E2K?
& how? I don't see the pretty gold screen only a NT authenication log-on
box.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Terminal Server Security

[Benjamin Scott]

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Phil wrote:
> Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.

  Then have the CEO setup the server.  If you fail to implement security,
you are not doing your job, and will be held liable for it when you get
broken into six months later.  Likely by the same CEO.

  A more practical solution might be to setup the VPN for the CEO, and place
a shortcut on the desktop.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000

[David Gibbons]

Thanks...  That's all I needed to know.

> No
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:08 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000
> 
> 
> List,
> 
> I'm still reading the archives but I have another question that I can't seem
> to find the answer to...
> 
> I currently have Exchange 5.5sp3 enterprise on NT 4sp6a enterprise.  We are
> moving to Windows 2000 (member server, no AD in place yet) with Exchange
> 5.5sp4 enterprise (16gig limit sucks!).
> 
> The question,
> 
> Does the enterprise version of Exchange require Windows 2000 Adv.?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> David
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Terminal Server Security (OT)

[Byron Kennedy]

oww yeah-  following on what some others have touched on: if you're sure you
want to expose this host to the net then you might also wish to use a
host-based ids package on it.  check out securityfocus.com for some
recommended vendors based on your environment.  Use something that is aware
of kernal mode vs. user mode calls - especially if you open up port 80.
audit the security logs carefully and use strong passwords (repeat that a
few times). good luck.

-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security


point of clarity:  the web client doesn't actually use port 80 but will use
3389 as well - check out the tsac docs for details. i recall that the high
encryp option is 128bit.

-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security


All you need is to forward port 3389 to your terminal server, and port 80 if
you want to use the web client.

-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Terminal Server Security


Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.
So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on the
Internet Directly
I miss spoke, I do want a firewall in front but I want to be able to connect
to the terminal services from the internet directly.

What do you think...
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 15:24
Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security


> Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security
>
>
> I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
> precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
> I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
> What are the security holes associated with doing this?
> When people lob in is it sent with plain text?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
>
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --

> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
>
>

==
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swyn

RE: Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000

[Martin Blackstone]

No

-Original Message-
From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000


List,

I'm still reading the archives but I have another question that I can't seem
to find the answer to...

I currently have Exchange 5.5sp3 enterprise on NT 4sp6a enterprise.  We are
moving to Windows 2000 (member server, no AD in place yet) with Exchange
5.5sp4 enterprise (16gig limit sucks!).

The question,

Does the enterprise version of Exchange require Windows 2000 Adv.?

Thanks.

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000

[David Gibbons]

List,

I'm still reading the archives but I have another question that I can't
seem to find the answer to...

I currently have Exchange 5.5sp3 enterprise on NT 4sp6a enterprise.  We
are moving to Windows 2000 (member server, no AD in place yet) with
Exchange 5.5sp4 enterprise (16gig limit sucks!).

The question,

Does the enterprise version of Exchange require Windows 2000 Adv.?

Thanks.

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Terminal Server Security

[Byron Kennedy]

point of clarity:  the web client doesn't actually use port 80 but will use
3389 as well - check out the tsac docs for details. i recall that the high
encryp option is 128bit.

-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security


All you need is to forward port 3389 to your terminal server, and port 80 if
you want to use the web client.

-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Terminal Server Security


Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.
So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on the
Internet Directly
I miss spoke, I do want a firewall in front but I want to be able to connect
to the terminal services from the internet directly.

What do you think...
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 15:24
Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security


> Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security
>
>
> I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
> precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
> I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
> What are the security holes associated with doing this?
> When people lob in is it sent with plain text?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
>
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --

> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
>
>

==
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: After 5.5 to 2K migration issues

[John Q Jr.]

Hello all -

 I have a real prolem here. 6 months ago I migrated 1/2 a 5.5 server to E2K.
All went well thanks to all the advise from this group.
I took one of two domains on the 5.5 server and moved it to a E2K system in
a different domain but the same forest. The other domain still remains on
the 5.5 box.
I was going to move the old domain from 5.5 to E2K this weekend, when I
noticed if the old 5.5 server was down, users on the new E2K system got a
window that said "Please wait while the system communicates w/ the old 5.5
server.
We are using windows XP with OL2K. Only some users are getting this error.
I thought it was because some users AD profiles had, .X400, ms, and .X500
connectors that linked to the old servers. I deleted them, but that did not
help. Can anyone please give me an idea as to why this new server still
communicates w/ the old 5.5 system and how to disable that communication?

Thanks, as always,
- John Q

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Terminal Server Security

[Chinnery Paul]

Dennis, 

Maybe I missed this somewhere, but I thought I read in the TS docs that it
had limited encryption capability.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Terminal Server Security


Open only port 3389 and require High security.  The usual mumbo jumbo about 
keeping up to date on security patches is a must!

Denny

At 03:52 PM 2/1/2002 -0500, Phil wrote:
>Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.
>So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on
the
>Internet Directly
>I miss spoke, I do want a firewall in front but I want to be able to
connect
>to the terminal services from the internet directly.
>
>What do you think...
>- Original Message -
>From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 15:24
>Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security
>
>
> > Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place?
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security
> >
> >
> > I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
> > precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
> > I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
> > What are the security holes associated with doing this?
> > When people lob in is it sent with plain text?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> >
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> >
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
--
>
> > The information contained in this email message is privileged and
>confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
>entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
>intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
>Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> >
> >
>===
=
>==
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>_
>
>Do You Yahoo!?
>
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mailboxes not replicating

[Rejdukowski, Bob]

Actually, pardon me for my incorrect verbage, but I figured it out...The
thing was Directory replication was not happening on 1 of my servers in our
site, turns out someone messed up our DNS entries...all fixed now but thanks
for taking the time to respond

Cheers!

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailboxes not replicating


Mailboxes do not replicate.  User objects do.  A mailbox-enabled user
object points to the corresponding mailbox on the Exchange server.

Post the entire NDR, please.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailboxes not replicating


We are a multiserver site single organization running 5.5 sp4 on all and
just this week if I create a new mailbox it replicates to all other
servers but 1, then when someone not on the same home server sends that
user an email they get a NDR...this is frustrating as Microsoft has no
doc on this and I have tried manual directory replication...one tidbit
that may helpthe server recipients container, for a modified date
says not available...

Thanks! 
Bob

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mailboxes not replicating

[Ed Crowley]

Mailboxes do not replicate.  User objects do.  A mailbox-enabled user
object points to the corresponding mailbox on the Exchange server.

Post the entire NDR, please.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailboxes not replicating


We are a multiserver site single organization running 5.5 sp4 on all and
just this week if I create a new mailbox it replicates to all other
servers but 1, then when someone not on the same home server sends that
user an email they get a NDR...this is frustrating as Microsoft has no
doc on this and I have tried manual directory replication...one tidbit
that may helpthe server recipients container, for a modified date
says not available...

Thanks! 
Bob

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook form sent over the internet

[Ed Crowley]

Be sure you're sending rich text to that recipient.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Winterton,
Robert K
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook form sent over the internet


I have a user that is sending an outlook form to a recipient over the
internet.  I have configured the form so that the form definition is
sent with the form data.  However, the external user still does not see
the form. I don't know much about their setup; would it matter if they
had outlook setup as internet only?  Any other reasons that they would
not be able to see the form?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Radio Buttons

[Callan, Chris]

I don't see where they talk about Outlook forms on the page.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


www.htmlgoodies.com


-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


So would this go on the value tape, under initial value.  if not where do I
implement this at.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


oh yah. I guess i should make a contribution.


this thread doesn't belong on this list, but.  for radio buttons to be
separate, they have to be grouped off:

Group1 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group2 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group3 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3

So the code would be like:

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option3"



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Chris killed the thread star.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Internet killed the video star.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Video killed the radio star.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ

RE: Radio Buttons

[Chris Levis]

www.htmlgoodies.com


-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


So would this go on the value tape, under initial value.  if not where do I
implement this at.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


oh yah. I guess i should make a contribution.


this thread doesn't belong on this list, but.  for radio buttons to be
separate, they have to be grouped off:

Group1 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group2 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group3 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3

So the code would be like:

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option3"



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Chris killed the thread star.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Internet killed the video star.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Video killed the radio star.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Radio Buttons

[Callan, Chris]

So would this go on the value tape, under initial value.  if not where do I
implement this at.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


oh yah. I guess i should make a contribution.


this thread doesn't belong on this list, but.  for radio buttons to be
separate, they have to be grouped off:

Group1 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group2 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group3 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3

So the code would be like:

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option3"



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Chris killed the thread star.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Internet killed the video star.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Video killed the radio star.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

changing admin password - multiple sites

[richard . lanci]

looking at Q274814 and Q152808, about changing the service account but
they all say servers in a site.   I have 5 sites.  Do I have to go to the
5 bridgeheads or changing 1 server will do.

Thanks
Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Terminal Server Security

[Nick Goodman]

All you need is to forward port 3389 to your terminal server, and port 80 if
you want to use the web client.

-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Terminal Server Security


Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.
So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on the
Internet Directly
I miss spoke, I do want a firewall in front but I want to be able to connect
to the terminal services from the internet directly.

What do you think...
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 15:24
Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security


> Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security
>
>
> I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
> precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
> I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
> What are the security holes associated with doing this?
> When people lob in is it sent with plain text?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
>
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --

> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
>
>

==
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Terminal Server Security

[Dennis Depp]

Open only port 3389 and require High security.  The usual mumbo jumbo about 
keeping up to date on security patches is a must!

Denny

At 03:52 PM 2/1/2002 -0500, Phil wrote:
>Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.
>So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on the
>Internet Directly
>I miss spoke, I do want a firewall in front but I want to be able to connect
>to the terminal services from the internet directly.
>
>What do you think...
>- Original Message -
>From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 15:24
>Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security
>
>
> > Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place?
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security
> >
> >
> > I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
> > precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
> > I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
> > What are the security holes associated with doing this?
> > When people lob in is it sent with plain text?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> >
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> >
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --
>
> > The information contained in this email message is privileged and
>confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
>entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
>intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
>Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> >
> >
>
>==
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>_
>
>Do You Yahoo!?
>
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: End of Support for MS products link

[Andy David]

I'm not dead! I'm very happy!



-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: End of Support for MS products link


Ahh!  Life cycle was the key.  I was looking under End of Life.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: End of Support for MS products link


You could start here: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp



-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: End of Support for MS products link


I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of
life date for various MS products.  I've looked high and low for it and
can't seem to locate it.  Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS
site...but could no find anything.  Anyone recall what the link was or tell
me where the list is?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Terminal Server Security

[Phil]

Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.
So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on the
Internet Directly
I miss spoke, I do want a firewall in front but I want to be able to connect
to the terminal services from the internet directly.

What do you think...
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 15:24
Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security


> Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security
>
>
> I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
> precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
> I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
> What are the security holes associated with doing this?
> When people lob in is it sent with plain text?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
>
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --

> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
>
>

==
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mailboxes not replicating

[Chris Scharff]

What's the error message?

-- 
Chris Scharff
The Mail Resource Center
http://www.mail-resources.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 2/1/2002 9:23 AM
Subject: Mailboxes not replicating

We are a multiserver site single organization running 5.5 sp4 on all and
just this week if I create a new mailbox it replicates to all other
servers but 1, then when someone not on the same home server sends that
user an email they get a NDR...this is frustrating as Microsoft has no
doc
on this and I have tried manual directory replication...one tidbit that
may helpthe server recipients container, for a modified date says
not
available...

Thanks! 
Bob



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: List of Ports Used

[Chris Scharff]

You might check the Exchange FAQ (E2K portion). I compiled all information I
could find when I compiled that answer... I think it's pretty complete.
--
Chris Scharff
The Mail Resource Center
http://www.mail-resources.com

-Original Message-
From: Comcast
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 1/31/2002 2:49 PM
Subject: List of Ports Used

Can I solicit several sources to use to find out what ports are used for
Win2K and Ex2K?

I have checked the archives - is the search feature still not working?
And
I have also checked MS Support site, as well as a few others.

 Thanks,
jEFF


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: End of Support for MS products link

[Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)]

Ahh!  Life cycle was the key.  I was looking under End of Life.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: End of Support for MS products link


You could start here: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp



-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: End of Support for MS products link


I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of
life date for various MS products.  I've looked high and low for it and
can't seem to locate it.  Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS
site...but could no find anything.  Anyone recall what the link was or tell
me where the list is?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Internal error: failed to create MAPI.Session.

[TMD]

Hi,
 

I am getting the following error message while trying to open my mailbox
through OWA. We just start receiving this error, before that it was
perfectly working for all users.

 

Internal error: failed to create MAPI.Session.

 

We are using NT-4.0 service pack 6a and Exchange 5.5 with service pack 4.0. 

 

Many thanks in advance.
TM

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Errors 4117 (IMS) and Errors 1101 & 1104 (ISPriv)

[Jay Kulsh]

Hi folks,

Exchange server is 5.5 with SP4. Once every few days, it gives Event ID
errors 4117 and then repeatedly errors 1101 and 1104. Exchange services
freeze and the only way to recover is to reboot.

There are very few entries in MS KnowledgeBase about Event ID 4117. None
with ID 1101 and 1104.
(Q230250, Q201904, Q190084 and Q169686 have not helped.)

We have analyzed the contents of messages that start the whole process.
There is nothing strange about their header or character set. Nor do they
always have attachments.

Only AntiVirus program running is NAV for Exchange (No NAV Corporate
Client).

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIS
   \ParametersSystem\Max Threads(Private+Public) value is 60 or 0x3c.

Here are details of the event logs -

Error 4117
An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service
uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server.  As a result, the
message in spool file DGKFMD7Q failed to be delivered. The message has been
moved to the  IMCDATA\IN\ARCHIVE directory.

Error 1101 ISPriv
Error 0xfbd3 occurred on message 13-163C7C during a background cleanup.

Error 1104 ISPriv
Error 0xfbd3 occurred during a background cleanup on attachment
13-13F2F7.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Jay
__
Jay Kulsh



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mailboxes not replicating

[Bob . Rejdukowski]

I am having a problem where mailboxes are not replicating to 1 server in
the site(Exchange 5.5 sp4)Anyone have any input on what this could
beso far no help from Microsoft KB

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

permission on exchange

[Richard Southwell]

I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4.  If I want to add, for instance, a new
address book view or amend one, I am unable to unless I login to the
exchange server as the exchange account.  I get the message

"You do not have the permissions required to complete this operation.
Microsoft Exchange Directory ID no: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS"

This is even though I have added an exchange GLOBAL group to the Org and
Site objects.

Can anyone explain why as there does not seem to be any info on this
subject - this is happening on 2 test servers.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: List of Ports Used

[Nick Goodman]

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn
ol/exchange/reskit/ex00res/resguide/appendb.asp

www.google.com is your friend :)

-Original Message-
From: Comcast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: List of Ports Used


Can I solicit several sources to use to find out what ports are used for
Win2K and Ex2K?

I have checked the archives - is the search feature still not working?  And
I have also checked MS Support site, as well as a few others.

 Thanks,
jEFF




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

rrors 4117 (IMS) and Errors 1101 & 1104 (ISPriv)

[Ajay]

Hi folks,

Exchange server is 5.5 with SP4. Once every few days, it gives Event ID
errors 4117 and then repeatedly errors 1101 and 1104. Exchange services
freeze and the only way to recover is to reboot.

There are very few entries in MS KnowledgeBase about Event ID 4117. None
with ID 1101 and 1104.
(Q230250, Q201904, Q190084 and Q169686 have not helped.)

We have analyzed the contents of messages that start the whole process.
There is nothing strange about their header or character set. Nor do they
always have attachments.

Only AntiVirus program running is NAV for Exchange (No NAV Corporate
Client).

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIS
   \ParametersSystem\Max Threads(Private+Public) value is 60 or 0x3c.

Here are details of the event logs -

Error 4117
An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail
Service
uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server.  As a result,
the
message in spool file DGKFMD7Q failed to be delivered. The message has
been
moved to the  IMCDATA\IN\ARCHIVE directory.

Error 1101 ISPriv
Error 0xfbd3 occurred on message 13-163C7C during a background
cleanup.

Error 1104 ISPriv
Error 0xfbd3 occurred during a background cleanup on attachment
13-13F2F7.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Jay
__
Jay Kulsh


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mailboxes not replicating

[Bob . Rejdukowski]

We are a multiserver site single organization running 5.5 sp4 on all and
just this week if I create a new mailbox it replicates to all other
servers but 1, then when someone not on the same home server sends that
user an email they get a NDR...this is frustrating as Microsoft has no doc
on this and I have tried manual directory replication...one tidbit that
may helpthe server recipients container, for a modified date says not
available...

Thanks! 
Bob

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List of Ports Used

[Comcast]

Can I solicit several sources to use to find out what ports are used for
Win2K and Ex2K?

I have checked the archives - is the search feature still not working?  And
I have also checked MS Support site, as well as a few others.

 Thanks,
jEFF




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Ed Crowley]

No, you do not need to do that.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4
domain (where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install the
E2K server in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the MSX5.5
org and site? The MSX5.5 server is in the EXCHANGEX domain and uses an
EXCHANGEX domain user ID as the service account.

I've got plenty of books, and white-papers stacked to the ceiling. I've
read most of the win2k and E2k resource kit books, and I've read
planning papers until my eyes are blurry. 

My original plan was to leave the EXCHANGEX NT4 domain and it's MSX 5.5
server alone and install the E2K server in my AD domain KII
(kii.kimball.com) (this is where the user accounts all live). Then, I'd
move the mailboxes from the MSX 5.5 server to the E2K server and retire
the MSX 5.5 server and the EXCHANGEX domain.

>From all the planning guides and white papers I've seen, this should be
a viable strategy. However, my E2K install is failing with an error
"0xc0070534: No mapping between account names and security IDs was done"
when installing SRS.

My general plan of attack:

1. Install empty root domain (ads.kimball.com) creating forest. 2.
Install ADC 3. Forestprep 4. Upgrade NT 4 domain KII (master user
domain) to AD (kii.kimball.com) 5. DomainPrep both domains. 6. Create
*one-way* CA from MSX5.5 server to kii.kimball.com 
7. Install E2K server in the *kii.kimball.com* domain joining the MSX5.5
org and site. 8. Move mailboxes from 5.5 server to E2K server 9. Retire
5.5 server (carefully paying attention to first server in site
issues)
10. Retire NT 4 EXCHANGEX domain.

Note that my MSX5.5 server would be in the NT4 domain EXCHANGEX and my
E2K server would be in kii.kimball.com. Would this prevent me from
adding an E2K server to my MSX5.5 org and site? 

I am confused on a couple of points:
1. Q270143 says that in mixed mode exchange *all* servers must use the
same "service account". Since E2K doesn't use a "service account", what
are they talking about? Should the E2K Exchange services run as the
MSX5.5 service account user ID instead of the system account?

2. The paper titled "Microsoft Exchange 2000 Internals: Installation and
Setup" says I need a *two-way* connection agreement between MSX5.5 and
AD. I did not think a two-way agreement was required.  

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it
must be in an Active Directory domain.

I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of
questions.  I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony
Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary
foundation work.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii).
I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my
>aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the 
>limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin

RE: Terminal Server Security

[Mellott, Bill]

wow you're asking for itI think
id do it from behind the firewall and just open the TS port which I think is
like 3389.
If you want to do the web part then open 80 too.

BUT first...
Do all the security fixes you can from MS plus the white paper on securing
IIS is a definite

at least for me

thx
bill

-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security


I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
What are the security holes associated with doing this?
When people lob in is it sent with plain text?

Thanks!




_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Terminal Server Security

[Martin Blackstone]

You've got balls Phil, and you are a cross posting freak.

-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security


I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box? I mean that I do not
want to have people VPN into the network first. What are the security holes
associated with doing this? When people lob in is it sent with plain text?

Thanks!




_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Terminal Server Security

[Andy David]

Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place?


-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security


I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
What are the security holes associated with doing this?
When people lob in is it sent with plain text?

Thanks!




_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

ot: Terminal Server Security

[Phil]

I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of
precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box?
I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first.
What are the security holes associated with doing this?
When people lob in is it sent with plain text?

Thanks!




_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Soysal, Serdar]

It's contact bowling
You get to tackle bowlers
using hockey sticks


-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


ten-pin or candle?
little balls that squeak like mice
tremble near big ones


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday



Team bowling today
We will bowl our stress away 
On lanes of despair

S.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Martin Blackstone]

That blows
Well now it looks like you may get your moneys worth out of it.


-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager


We already have the Network Appliance.  It was purchased for our Unix based 
IMAP server, and then we found out our IMAP server would not support it.

Denny

At 11:45 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Can you run the SW without the Network Appliance?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:39 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>Thanks!  I have a call into a rep now.  As for the cost, I don't think 
>that will be much of a problem.  We are looking at placing this on a 
>single server for about 5000 users.  (clustered of course.)  The cost 
>of the CALs makes $30K much easier to swallow.
>
>Thanks again.
>
>Denny
>
>At 11:19 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> >Ahhh. I think it can do that, but never tested for it.
> >
> >Call a rep. You should be able to get a demo unit. They brought one 
> >in for me, installed it, configed, and everything. I had it about 60 
> >days
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager
> >
> >
> >There used to be a product call CommVault (I don't know if it is 
> >still available or not.)  This product could do a restore of 
> >individual items. I.e. restore a single message.
> >
> >Denny
> >
> >At 10:56 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> > >What do you mean, the granularity?
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
> > >To: Exchange Discussions
> > >Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
> > >
> > >
> > >Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are 
> > >your thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the 
> > >restore?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Dennis Depp
> > >
> > >
> > >_
> > >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >_
> > >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Dennis Depp]

We already have the Network Appliance.  It was purchased for our Unix based 
IMAP server, and then we found out our IMAP server would not support it.

Denny

At 11:45 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Can you run the SW without the Network Appliance?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:39 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>Thanks!  I have a call into a rep now.  As for the cost, I don't think that
>will be much of a problem.  We are looking at placing this on a single
>server for about 5000 users.  (clustered of course.)  The cost of the CALs
>makes $30K much easier to swallow.
>
>Thanks again.
>
>Denny
>
>At 11:19 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> >Ahhh. I think it can do that, but never tested for it.
> >
> >Call a rep. You should be able to get a demo unit. They brought one in
> >for me, installed it, configed, and everything. I had it about 60
> >days
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager
> >
> >
> >There used to be a product call CommVault (I don't know if it is still
> >available or not.)  This product could do a restore of individual
> >items. I.e. restore a single message.
> >
> >Denny
> >
> >At 10:56 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> > >What do you mean, the granularity?
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
> > >To: Exchange Discussions
> > >Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
> > >
> > >
> > >Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your
> > >thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Dennis Depp
> > >
> > >
> > >_
> > >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >_
> > >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Soysal, Serdar]

Brilliant idea
Will pass it to finance folks
We're poor bowlers though!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


Things will get better
Hopefully they wont claim strikes
as new revenue


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday



Team bowling today
We will bowl our stress away 
On lanes of despair

S.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook form sent over the internet

[Winterton, Robert K]

I have a user that is sending an outlook form to a recipient over the
internet.  I have configured the form so that the form definition is sent
with the form data.  However, the external user still does not see the form.
I don't know much about their setup; would it matter if they had outlook
setup as internet only?  Any other reasons that they would not be able to
see the form?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Martin Blackstone]

Can you run the SW without the Network Appliance?

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager


Thanks!  I have a call into a rep now.  As for the cost, I don't think that 
will be much of a problem.  We are looking at placing this on a single 
server for about 5000 users.  (clustered of course.)  The cost of the CALs 
makes $30K much easier to swallow.

Thanks again.

Denny

At 11:19 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
>Ahhh. I think it can do that, but never tested for it.
>
>Call a rep. You should be able to get a demo unit. They brought one in 
>for me, installed it, configed, and everything. I had it about 60 
>days
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>There used to be a product call CommVault (I don't know if it is still 
>available or not.)  This product could do a restore of individual 
>items. I.e. restore a single message.
>
>Denny
>
>At 10:56 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> >What do you mean, the granularity?
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
> >
> >
> >Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your 
> >thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Dennis Depp
> >
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: End of Support for MS products link

[Andy David]

You could start here: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp



-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: End of Support for MS products link


I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of
life date for various MS products.  I've looked high and low for it and
can't seem to locate it.  Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS
site...but could no find anything.  Anyone recall what the link was or tell
me where the list is?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Dennis Depp]

Thanks!  I have a call into a rep now.  As for the cost, I don't think that 
will be much of a problem.  We are looking at placing this on a single 
server for about 5000 users.  (clustered of course.)  The cost of the CALs 
makes $30K much easier to swallow.

Thanks again.

Denny

At 11:19 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
>Ahhh. I think it can do that, but never tested for it.
>
>Call a rep. You should be able to get a demo unit. They brought one in for
>me, installed it, configed, and everything. I had it about 60 days
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>There used to be a product call CommVault (I don't know if it is still
>available or not.)  This product could do a restore of individual items.
>I.e. restore a single message.
>
>Denny
>
>At 10:56 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> >What do you mean, the granularity?
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
> >
> >
> >Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your
> >thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Dennis Depp
> >
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 5.5 SP3 - upgrade to SP4 ends in weird error.### Please help.###!

[Ritu Sangha]

I've been trying to install SP4 on our Exchange server on Windows 2000 SP2
for as long as the darned thing has been out. It goes to what looks like
almost done to say Successful -but it gives this weird error of Access
Denied 0xc000405 or some such (I forget the exact number of hand), and
quits. BTW: It started with pointing out errors in the various .ins files.
"error at line 48" in server.ins and such. Most of these were registry
edits. Upon checking the registry I noted the changes these ins files were
trying to make were all already there! 
So I simply commented out those lines and it would go ont to the next
file... until almost all the files were commented out.

It goes no farther and I am stuck.

Everything seems works well except a few quirks: # I cannot install post SP4
hotfixes.
#In the Administrator - trying to change any settings presents a dialog box
with three options, Abort/ Ignore/ quit - we choose ignore and the settings
box shows up. Mostly lets me do what I need to. Every now and then errors
out and tells me to restart the Administrator or the server if restarting
the administrator doesn't work.

I donated $245 to Microsoft Tech Support last year, a bunch of 'you know
what's' they are. They had me start the Administrator in Raw mode and
manually change the version number!
Still the Post SP4 hotfixes don't work. So they suggested I reinstall the
server!! Say What!!

And I gave up there. 

Any and all help will be appreciated.

Thanks

Ritu


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

End of Support for MS products link

[Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)]

I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of
life date for various MS products.  I've looked high and low for it and
can't seem to locate it.  Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS
site...but could no find anything.  Anyone recall what the link was or tell
me where the list is?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook Rules Problem

[Hunter, Lori]

OK, you can slightly modify Doug's suggestion while still living within the
spirit of it.  Set the Out of Office reply on that one guy's mailbox, allow
OOF to the internet, the reply comes directly from ExUser to CurrentSender,
voila who wants pie.

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Lori,

I'm currently working on this.  I will let you know what happens.  I ran it
by my boss and she didn't really seem to care about that suggestion.
Because they want it to bounce back from that specific user.  So I'm on the
phone with Compaq Software Support.  I will let the list know what happens
with this issue.  Thank you guys/gals for all your help.  I really do
appreciate it.


___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


John, you didn't reply to this suggestion, which is by far the best one
you've gotten.  Please tell us this is the way you will recommend that this
be done.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Here's how we handle it:
1. Never allow auto replies to the Internet, you WILL get a mail loop.
2. Allow OOF to the Internet. In theory it can loop, but I have not been
able to find someone that experienced one in the past couple of years.
3. We set the Alternate Recipient to a Dead Letter mailbox 
4. The Dead Letter mailbox has an OOF that replies that the mailbox they are
trying to reach is no longer valid and includes a bunch of contact info.
This info includes Sales and Support numbers that the sender can call so
they will not be left out in the cold. 

HR is happy, Sales is happy, Customer Support is happy, and IT is happy.


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


I've already told them how I didn't approve.  But it doesn't matter what I
think obviously.  But when the Son of a bitch crashes I'm going to look at
my boss w/my $hit eating grin and say "Told you so"   That's it.


___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
W: 240.453.3575
C:  301.938.6294
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


I'm not going to sit here and argue on why this isn't the right thing to do.
My manager and HR want it done, so it has to be done.  How can I get this to
work?  

Thanks,

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


HR just wants an Auto Reply.  I told them the consequences and they seem
alright with that, so I'm going to give it to them.  And when the system
crashes from a mail loop.  Then maybe they will start listening to me a bit
more.

But what I explained earlier should work?  I don't need to do anything
special for this to work right?

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Wouldn't it make more sense to forward the e-mails to the correct person and
let them answer it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Yea I know this is a bad idea.  But they want to use this for 30 days
because someone important left the company and they want everyone sending
him email to know that he no longer works here.  Not my idea!  I already
told them I don't like it.  So if that happens, I'll just sit back here
laughing at their stupid a$$es.

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Martin Blackstone]

Oh yea, BTW, I think the starting cost is about 30K

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager


There used to be a product call CommVault (I don't know if it is still 
available or not.)  This product could do a restore of individual items. 
I.e. restore a single message.

Denny

At 10:56 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
>What do you mean, the granularity?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your 
>thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?
>
>Thanks
>
>Dennis Depp
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Martin Blackstone]

Ahhh. I think it can do that, but never tested for it.

Call a rep. You should be able to get a demo unit. They brought one in for
me, installed it, configed, and everything. I had it about 60 days

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Network Appliance SnapManager


There used to be a product call CommVault (I don't know if it is still 
available or not.)  This product could do a restore of individual items. 
I.e. restore a single message.

Denny

At 10:56 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
>What do you mean, the granularity?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your 
>thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?
>
>Thanks
>
>Dennis Depp
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Ken Cornetet]

Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 domain
(where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install the E2K server
in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the MSX5.5 org and site?
The MSX5.5 server is in the EXCHANGEX domain and uses an EXCHANGEX domain
user ID as the service account.

I've got plenty of books, and white-papers stacked to the ceiling. I've read
most of the win2k and E2k resource kit books, and I've read planning papers
until my eyes are blurry. 

My original plan was to leave the EXCHANGEX NT4 domain and it's MSX 5.5
server alone and install the E2K server in my AD domain KII
(kii.kimball.com) (this is where the user accounts all live). Then, I'd move
the mailboxes from the MSX 5.5 server to the E2K server and retire the MSX
5.5 server and the EXCHANGEX domain.

>From all the planning guides and white papers I've seen, this should be a
viable strategy. However, my E2K install is failing with an error
"0xc0070534: No mapping between account names and security IDs was done"
when installing SRS.

My general plan of attack:

1. Install empty root domain (ads.kimball.com) creating forest.
2. Install ADC
3. Forestprep
4. Upgrade NT 4 domain KII (master user domain) to AD (kii.kimball.com)
5. DomainPrep both domains.
6. Create *one-way* CA from MSX5.5 server to kii.kimball.com 
7. Install E2K server in the *kii.kimball.com* domain joining the MSX5.5 org
and site.
8. Move mailboxes from 5.5 server to E2K server
9. Retire 5.5 server (carefully paying attention to first server in site
issues)
10. Retire NT 4 EXCHANGEX domain.

Note that my MSX5.5 server would be in the NT4 domain EXCHANGEX and my E2K
server would be in kii.kimball.com. Would this prevent me from adding an E2K
server to my MSX5.5 org and site? 

I am confused on a couple of points:
1. Q270143 says that in mixed mode exchange *all* servers must use the same
"service account". Since E2K doesn't use a "service account", what are they
talking about? Should the E2K Exchange services run as the MSX5.5 service
account user ID instead of the system account?

2. The paper titled "Microsoft Exchange 2000 Internals: Installation and
Setup" says I need a *two-way* connection agreement between MSX5.5 and AD. I
did not think a two-way agreement was required.  

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it
must be in an Active Directory domain.

I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of
questions.  I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony
Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary
foundation work.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii).
I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my 
>aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the 
>limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Dennis Depp]

There used to be a product call CommVault (I don't know if it is still 
available or not.)  This product could do a restore of individual items. 
I.e. restore a single message.

Denny

At 10:56 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
>What do you mean, the granularity?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your
>thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?
>
>Thanks
>
>Dennis Depp
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Purge folder

[Andy David]

Lori's spell...


-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Purge folder


Richard, please read the Outlook help files.  This information and OH SO
MUCH MORE can be learned by merely typing all your questions into the Office
Assistant of your choice, and all will be revealed.  Once you find you don't
understand the Assistant's answer, please post it with the relevant question
attached and then perhaps someone will help you.  You should also spend much
more time than you currently do reading Slipstick.com.  In fact, go
subscribe to Sue's Outlook Users group and I promise I will resist the
temptation to cast an evil spell your way when you post your questions over
there.

As long as you've read the help files first, that is.

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Purge folder


Hello, 

Is there a way to make exchange purge messages according to date or
time for a mailbox.

RT

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Purge folder

[Hunter, Lori]

Richard, please read the Outlook help files.  This information and OH SO
MUCH MORE can be learned by merely typing all your questions into the Office
Assistant of your choice, and all will be revealed.  Once you find you don't
understand the Assistant's answer, please post it with the relevant question
attached and then perhaps someone will help you.  You should also spend much
more time than you currently do reading Slipstick.com.  In fact, go
subscribe to Sue's Outlook Users group and I promise I will resist the
temptation to cast an evil spell your way when you post your questions over
there.

As long as you've read the help files first, that is.

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Purge folder


Hello, 

Is there a way to make exchange purge messages according to date or
time for a mailbox.

RT

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Chris Levis]

ten-pin or candle?
little balls that squeak like mice
tremble near big ones


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday



Team bowling today
We will bowl our stress away 
On lanes of despair

S.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

[Benjamin Scott]

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Wynkoop, John wrote:
> We were looking at about $50k for a dell with LTO backup, sound right?

  I like Dell.  LTO backup is well-regarded.  Without more information
(mailbox sizing, expected activity rates, etc.), it is impossible to provide
an answer, but conventional wisdom says:  Multiple processors.  One set of
mirrored disks for the OS, one set of mirrored disks for transaction logs,
and a RAID 5 set for the information store itself.  And as much RAM as you
can afford.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Andy David]

Things will get better
Hopefully they wont claim strikes
as new revenue


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday



Team bowling today
We will bowl our stress away 
On lanes of despair

S.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Martin Blackstone]

What do you mean, the granularity?

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager


Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your 
thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?

Thanks

Dennis Depp


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Network Appliance SnapManager

[Martin Blackstone]

I demo'd it. It looked like a sweet product, but out of my price range.
You can literally restore a damaged IS in about 3 minutes

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager


Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your 
thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?

Thanks

Dennis Depp


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Haiku Friday

[Soysal, Serdar]

Team bowling today
We will bowl our stress away 
On lanes of despair

S.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Brian Meline]

Andy, and Ed from a severed thread, are right.
E2K does NOT need to be in native mode to join a 5.5 domain.
Our network did it: joined 5.5, moved mailboxes, replicated
public folders [but that's a long story], served users from
the new server for mail and public folders, got OWA going with
mailbox and public folder access, all in the same 5.5 organization
in mixed mode (but I didn't say "no sweat").
You go native, forget about your 5.5 server.  Delpart it, unless
you want to re-install E2K and do the whole thing over again.

You CAN have an E2K server in one site/domain connecting to a 5.5 server,
and use site links and site connectors (which is actually a smarter
way to go; no Free/Busy errors when you [oops] disconnect the
5.5 server a little early.been there, done that).

Brian J. Meline, MCSE, 2000MCP
Network Support, Exchange Administrator
Resolution, Inc.
"I didn't know what I was looking for until I found it." Peter Davison

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Network Appliance SnapManager

[Dennis Depp]

Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000?  If so what are your 
thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?

Thanks

Dennis Depp


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook Rules Problem

[Bowles, John L.]

Lori,

I'm currently working on this.  I will let you know what happens.  I ran it
by my boss and she didn't really seem to care about that suggestion.
Because they want it to bounce back from that specific user.  So I'm on the
phone with Compaq Software Support.  I will let the list know what happens
with this issue.  Thank you guys/gals for all your help.  I really do
appreciate it.


___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


John, you didn't reply to this suggestion, which is by far the best one
you've gotten.  Please tell us this is the way you will recommend that this
be done.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Here's how we handle it:
1. Never allow auto replies to the Internet, you WILL get a mail loop.
2. Allow OOF to the Internet. In theory it can loop, but I have not been
able to find someone that experienced one in the past couple of years.
3. We set the Alternate Recipient to a Dead Letter mailbox 
4. The Dead Letter mailbox has an OOF that replies that the mailbox they are
trying to reach is no longer valid and includes a bunch of contact info.
This info includes Sales and Support numbers that the sender can call so
they will not be left out in the cold. 

HR is happy, Sales is happy, Customer Support is happy, and IT is happy.


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


I've already told them how I didn't approve.  But it doesn't matter what I
think obviously.  But when the Son of a bitch crashes I'm going to look at
my boss w/my $hit eating grin and say "Told you so"   That's it.


___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
W: 240.453.3575
C:  301.938.6294
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


I'm not going to sit here and argue on why this isn't the right thing to do.
My manager and HR want it done, so it has to be done.  How can I get this to
work?  

Thanks,

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


HR just wants an Auto Reply.  I told them the consequences and they seem
alright with that, so I'm going to give it to them.  And when the system
crashes from a mail loop.  Then maybe they will start listening to me a bit
more.

But what I explained earlier should work?  I don't need to do anything
special for this to work right?

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Wouldn't it make more sense to forward the e-mails to the correct person and
let them answer it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Yea I know this is a bad idea.  But they want to use this for 30 days
because someone important left the company and they want everyone sending
him email to know that he no longer works here.  Not my idea!  I already
told them I don't like it.  So if that happens, I'll just sit back here
laughing at their stupid a$$es.

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply???

BAD IDEA!

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> --

OWA 5.5

[Friese, Casey]

Hello,

My setup is NT 4.0 SP6a, IIS 4.0 with latest hotfixes and Exchange 5.5 SP4

I need to here some opinions on hosting multiple web sites on the same IIS
4.0 box as OWA is installed.  I'm concerned with OWA being installed under
the default web site right along side of other web sites under the default
web site as well.  The server that I have OWA installed on started out to be
just for OWA but quickly is becoming the home for many other web sites that
need to be accessed from both internal and external connections.  I'm seeing
a problem that when any changes are made to the other web sites, owa becomes
inaccessible.  All of the other web sites are running with ties to Cold
Fusion Server 5.0 which is also installed on the OWA server.

Has anyone experienced any problems like this or am I a loner and what are
everyones views about hosting multiple web sites on the same machine as OWA
5.5?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can't forward meeting requests.

[Smith, Calvin C]

Has anybody seen a problem where meeting requests can't be forwarded when
they originate from a particular organization?

-Original Message-
From: Smith, Calvin C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Chabot, Cliff
Subject: Can't forward meeting requests.


We are a large user of Exchange.  There are several individual Exchange 5.5
organizations.  If a meeting request comes from one particular organization,
the user can't forward it.  They get the error, "You do not have the
permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user"  Of course,
we are not trying to send on behalf, we are trying to forward the meeting
request.  This problem happens with one organization with meeting requests
going both ways.  This organization is in a domain that does not have any
trust relationship with ours.

Does anybody have a suggestion on how to work around this?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Radio Buttons

[Chris Levis]

oh yah. I guess i should make a contribution.


this thread doesn't belong on this list, but.  for radio buttons to be
separate, they have to be grouped off:

Group1 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group2 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3
Group3 - Option 1, Option 2, Option 3

So the code would be like:

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group1" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group2" value="option3"

INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option1"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option2"
INPUT TYPE="radio" name="Group3" value="option3"



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Chris killed the thread star.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Internet killed the video star.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Video killed the radio star.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Radio Buttons

[Andy David]

Chris killed the thread star.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Internet killed the video star.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Video killed the radio star.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Radio Buttons

[Chris Levis]

Internet killed the video star.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Radio Buttons


Video killed the radio star.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Radio Buttons

[Doug Hampshire]

Video killed the radio star.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Purge folder

[Doug Hampshire]

Look for the eating disorders tab under properties for Outlook today. You
have to enable the binge option first.

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Purge folder


Hello, 

Is there a way to make exchange purge messages according to date or
time for a mailbox.

RT

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Purge folder

[Tener, Richard]

thats cool I just want to know I never asked how.


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Purge folder


Yes.  But I don't feel like telling you.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Purge folder


Hello, 

Is there a way to make exchange purge messages according to date
or time for a mailbox.

RT

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Purge folder

[Ed Crowley]

Yes.  But I don't feel like telling you.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Purge folder


Hello, 

Is there a way to make exchange purge messages according to date
or time for a mailbox.

RT

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Purge folder

[Tener, Richard]

Hello, 

Is there a way to make exchange purge messages according to date or
time for a mailbox.

RT

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Andy David]

Sure about that?


-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running
in Native mode in your domain.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii).
I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my 
>aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the 
>limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

Network Defence Ltd
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Bloom, Tom]

Is kii.kimball.com a W2K domain? If so, we just did a similar upgrade. We installed a 
5.5 server in the new W2K domain and joined it to the 5.5 site (here's where you need 
the service account password). Then we installed an E2K server in the W2K domain and 
moved mailboxes. Of course there are lot more steps and preparations, but that's the 
basic scheme. Things worked fine.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I
want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my
>aforementioned
>problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Ed Crowley]

That's nonsense.  Some things work better for migration when you have a
native mode Windows 2000 domain, but it's hardly a requirement.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running
in Native mode in your domain.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii).
I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my
>aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the 
>limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager.

Network Defence Ltd
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Ed Crowley]

Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it
must be in an Active Directory domain.

I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of
questions.  I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony
Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary
foundation work.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii).
I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my 
>aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the 
>limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Radio Buttons

[Ed Crowley]

Put them in a group.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Radio Buttons


I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that
have their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio
button for the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to
check one radio button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Applying Recipient Policies

[Bloom, Tom]

I don't seem to be able to apply more than one recipient policy. Exchange is in mixed 
mode so I have the policy from my 5.5 server. That's the only policy that will apply 
to new users. But since I can't modify it, I've created another policy to add another 
SMTP address. And then there's the Default Policy that's been set up to allow access 
to OWA. Our 5.5 policy is listed as Highest, the Default Policy is listed as Lowest. 
The other policy is listed as priority 2. What are some reasons that the other two 
policies won't apply to new users? I updated RUS after creating the new policy.

Tom Bloom




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Adam Romain]

Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running
in Native mode in your domain.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!


My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii).
I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my 
>aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the 
>limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

Network Defence Ltd
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: iPaq Synch Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Hmm, I sync folders to my toaster

-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iPaq Synch Question


My 3650 with 2002 works the other way.

-Original Message-
From: Desjardins, Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iPaq Synch Question


I have to disagree Craig,  I just tried it with my 3835 and synched
a folder without making the folder available off-line.  The entire folder
hierarchy is visible in the Ipaq, but not the messages unless you specify
through ActiveSynch Tools|Options.  I don't normally synch any folders but I
can read messages in my Inbox and move them to any folder on the Ipaq and
then on the next synch, they move to that folder on Exchange.

Ray Desjardins MCSE NT4.0/Win2k
Manager of Systems Services
Bridgewater State College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: iPaq Synch Question



Yes, you do have to have 2002, but you still have to make the folders
available off-line.  If you don't then you still can't synch them to your
iPaq.

Sorry.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: iPaq Synch Question

[Dupler, Craig]

My 3650 with 2002 works the other way.

-Original Message-
From: Desjardins, Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iPaq Synch Question


I have to disagree Craig,  I just tried it with my 3835 and synched
a folder without making the folder available off-line.  The entire folder
hierarchy is visible in the Ipaq, but not the messages unless you specify
through ActiveSynch Tools|Options.  I don't normally synch any folders but I
can read messages in my Inbox and move them to any folder on the Ipaq and
then on the next synch, they move to that folder on Exchange.

Ray Desjardins MCSE NT4.0/Win2k
Manager of Systems Services
Bridgewater State College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: iPaq Synch Question



Yes, you do have to have 2002, but you still have to make the folders
available off-line.  If you don't then you still can't synch them to your
iPaq.

Sorry.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Ken Cornetet]

My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I
want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move
mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the
EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be...

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!



Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my
>aforementioned
>problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Radio Buttons

[Callan, Chris]

I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have
their own radio buttons.  But I can't select more than one radio button for
the whole page.  What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio
button for one category.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: showing a user's calendar in public folders

[Nikki Cleland - ITCX]

Why not just drop links to the clients calendar(s) into a public folder...
Drag and drop the calendar onto the desktop, rename it TOMS CALENDAR, and
then drag and drop it back to the public folder. The client will need to
give default REVIEWER permissions to his calendar folder. They may want to
learn how to use "PRIVATE" calendar appointments for non-sharable info...

-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: showing a user's calendar in public folders


I'd like to set up a public folders and publish some users' calendars to a
public folder...  ie, PublicFolders\PeopleCalendars\Mike and show Mike's
calendar.  Just copying the calendar won't work, of course, cuz then it's
just a copy.  I need the two calendars (the one in his mailbox and the
Public) to be sync'ed.

Thanks =)


 __
   Chris Levis 
   Applied Geographics, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   617-292-7125 x112
   

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I'm confused now!

[Walt Brannon]

Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5
servers must be running the same SA. 

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: I'm confused now!
>
>I mean even more confused than normal...
>
>I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my
>aforementioned
>problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of
running
>exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
>
>"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service
account. "
>
>Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing
something?
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behavior

[Ed Crowley]

There's no such thing as a 60GB "threshold".  Myself, I would look at
the network.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arnold, Paul
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behavior


Hi All.

I have a strange problem. My exchange server is running pretty slow. We
are running Exchange 5.5, sp4. The priv.mdb is 58 GB, and has slowly
climbed to that size, but performance SUDDENLY went to a crawl this
morning. There are no strange (or error) events in the event log, SMTP
connections are still working in/out and CPU & memory usage are
generally low. Traffic on the switch is low as well.

(BTW: I know there is a 60GB threshold that we are dangerously close to,
but a new 2000 clustered Exchange server will be in place within 6
weeks.)

I don't expect a list thread of "did you check.." (but I'd welcome it)
but here is something strange: When I look at the list of mailboxes in
Exch Admin on the server and sort by size, 4 mailboxes (each is quite
large) get sorted above the empty mailboxes. So my sort looks like this:
Mailbox Total K Total items
User1   2,227,430   21,129
User2   2,535,232   18,538
User3   3,344,777   32,785
User4   3,444,626   57,871
User5   0   0
User6   0   0
User7   1   1
...etc

The bottom of the list looks normal enough...a few mailboxes some even
near the same size.

Has anyone experienced similar phenomena? I think I have noticed this in
the past, and it may not be related to the performance, but it was
bugging me.

My suggestion was to clean up those mailboxes, export the content, then
blow them away and recreate them.

Thanks
Paul
 
LEGAL NOTICE - Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s)
only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are
not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents or any
action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be
unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender
immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can't delete some messages

[Walt Brannon]

Don't give him a bad time, he fixed the problem.  I transliterated
"recycle bin" into Deleted Items folder and understood perfectly well.

Walt

>-Original Message-
>From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:36 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Can't delete some messages
>
>So hitting delete normally sends messages to the 'Recycle Bin' does it?
>
>Interesting.
>
>Regards
>
>Mr Louis Joyce
>Network Support Analyst
>Exchange Administrator
>BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 01 February 2002 15:00
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Can't delete some messages
>
>
>Hold down SHIFT and then press delete I had this problem once.  It will
>automatically delete the message with out going to recycle bin.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:40 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Can't delete some messages
>
>
>Some users report an inability to delete some messages.  Ones reported
>so far are Yahoo spam.  Is SPAM that good that now it cannot be
deleted?
>
>
>Exchange 2K SP2... single site single server.
>
>Has anyone else seen this?
>
>Thanks
>
>Walt
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Migration from Notes to Exchange

[Farquharson, Andrea]

Does anyone know what Event ID 1 means?
Here is the text of the message:

Could not create a profile for Account: Microsoft System Attendant. 
Please reboot your system to clear hung profiles.

I'm trying to migrate a Lotus Notes file to an Exchange mailbox.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm confused now!

[Ken Cornetet]

I mean even more confused than normal...

I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my aforementioned
problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running
exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:

"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. "

Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: cannot send the message on behalf

[Hunter, Lori]

How long did you wait since setting those permissions?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot send the message on behalf


I still cannot get send on behalf to work.  The delegates have owner rights
on the mailbox, the exch admin delivery options tab is set on.

It just doesn't work.  Please any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot send the message on behalf


On the properties of the mailbox in Exchange admin.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 January 2002 15:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot send the message on behalf


Where do you find the delivery options tab ?

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 5:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot send the message on behalf


If you wish person A to be able to send things on behalf of person B, you
need to go into the properties of person B's mailbox and add person A to the
delivery options tab that allows them to send on behalf of person B. 

Just having permissions to view the persons mailbox wont automagically give
you permissions to send messages on behalf of them, unless the mailbox is
set up as your primary box in your outlook profile. 

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 January 2002 22:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: cannot send the message on behalf


Good afternoon,

Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4..

I have a delegate that is trying to REPLY to a message from the mailbox.
When they try and send the message they get 'you do not have permission of
the individual to send this email' message.

I looked at Google and it says to give the delegate Owner permissions to the
Inbox.  I have done that and I still get the same message.  

Please help.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

[Mellott, Bill]

A friend has on his wall

1.) Good
2.) Fast
3.) Cheap

pick two

-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)


Good and Fast
Cheap is optional...
We were looking at about $50k for a dell with LTO backup, sound right?

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)


On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Wynkoop, John wrote:
> Performace is the main issue here with cost running a very close second.

  Good, fast, cheap: Pick two.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not
|
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

[Wynkoop, John]

Good and Fast
Cheap is optional...
We were looking at about $50k for a dell with LTO backup, sound right?

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)


On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Wynkoop, John wrote:
> Performace is the main issue here with cost running a very close second.

  Good, fast, cheap: Pick two.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not
|
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: outlook programming

[Hunter, Lori]

Look into Mailkeeper.  It's probably mentioned on Slipstick - I've lost the
link.

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook programming




Im trying to set up a file system for outlook messages.  Say if you recieve
a message and you want to put it on a file server I would like to just drag
and drop that file into outlook.  I know you can do this now with the
outlook shortcut bar but the problem is when you click on a folder that is
not in outlook it brings you to that folder without a preview of the
message.  My company would like to go to that file and be able to preview it
like it would in outlook.


-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook programming


To do what?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook programming


Does anyone know of a company that can program outlook to our companys need?

RGDS
Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook Rules Problem

[Hunter, Lori]

John, you didn't reply to this suggestion, which is by far the best one
you've gotten.  Please tell us this is the way you will recommend that this
be done.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Here's how we handle it:
1. Never allow auto replies to the Internet, you WILL get a mail loop.
2. Allow OOF to the Internet. In theory it can loop, but I have not been
able to find someone that experienced one in the past couple of years.
3. We set the Alternate Recipient to a Dead Letter mailbox 
4. The Dead Letter mailbox has an OOF that replies that the mailbox they are
trying to reach is no longer valid and includes a bunch of contact info.
This info includes Sales and Support numbers that the sender can call so
they will not be left out in the cold. 

HR is happy, Sales is happy, Customer Support is happy, and IT is happy.


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


I've already told them how I didn't approve.  But it doesn't matter what I
think obviously.  But when the Son of a bitch crashes I'm going to look at
my boss w/my $hit eating grin and say "Told you so"   That's it.


___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
W: 240.453.3575
C:  301.938.6294
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


I'm not going to sit here and argue on why this isn't the right thing to do.
My manager and HR want it done, so it has to be done.  How can I get this to
work?  

Thanks,

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


HR just wants an Auto Reply.  I told them the consequences and they seem
alright with that, so I'm going to give it to them.  And when the system
crashes from a mail loop.  Then maybe they will start listening to me a bit
more.

But what I explained earlier should work?  I don't need to do anything
special for this to work right?

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Wouldn't it make more sense to forward the e-mails to the correct person and
let them answer it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


Yea I know this is a bad idea.  But they want to use this for 30 days
because someone important left the company and they want everyone sending
him email to know that he no longer works here.  Not my idea!  I already
told them I don't like it.  So if that happens, I'll just sit back here
laughing at their stupid a$$es.

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem


And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply???

BAD IDEA!

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> -Original Message-
> From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 January 2002 14:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: FW: Outlook Rules Problem
>
>
> All,
>
> I'm trying to setup Auto Reply's to the internet.  I've unchecked the
> box "Disable Auto-Replies to the internet" Now when I go into
> Outlook to setup
> this Rule.  I have the rule to check messages when they
> arrive that was sent
> to my name.  Then I have server send reply using basically an
> email message
> back to the user.  In the email box I just put in the things
> I want the user
> to know, hit save and close.
>
> But when I send messages to my mailbox it's not auto-replying back to
> the internet.  It works internal

RE: Strange behavior

[Chris Scharff]

Nope. Give a high enough number, the value reported in the GUI is 0, but the
sort order tells the real story.

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 2/1/2002 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behavior

The mailboxes that show 0 items have 0 items. They are empty admin
mailboxes.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behavior


I had a similar situation.  Two users had mailboxes that had over a
million
items in it and the mailbox resources view of total k and # of items
always
indicated 0.  You need to look at the mailboxes for the two users that
show
0 items.  

Dot

> -Original Message-
> From: Arnold, Paul [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:07 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  Strange behavior
> 
> Hi All.
> 
> I have a strange problem. My exchange server is running pretty slow. 
> We are running Exchange 5.5, sp4. The priv.mdb is 58 GB, and has 
> slowly climbed to that size, but performance SUDDENLY went to a crawl 
> this morning. There are no strange (or error) events in the event log,

> SMTP connections are still working in/out and CPU & memory usage are 
> generally low. Traffic on the switch is low as well.
> 
> (BTW: I know there is a 60GB threshold that we are dangerously close 
> to, but a new 2000 clustered Exchange server will be in place within 6

> weeks.)
> 
> I don't expect a list thread of "did you check.." (but I'd welcome it)

> but here is something strange: When I look at the list of mailboxes in

> Exch Admin on the server and sort by
> size, 4 mailboxes (each is quite large) get sorted above the empty
> mailboxes.
> So my sort looks like this:
> Mailbox   Total K Total items
> User1 2,227,430   21,129
> User2 2,535,232   18,538
> User3 3,344,777   32,785
> User4 3,444,626   57,871
> User5 0   0
> User6 0   0
> User7 1   1
> ...etc

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

[Benjamin Scott]

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Wynkoop, John wrote:
> Performace is the main issue here with cost running a very close second.

  Good, fast, cheap: Pick two.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]