RE: E2K: automatic address list creation
"Can be"??? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm@;wlkmmas.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 7:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: E2K: automatic address list creation > > > I can be a tool... > > --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: E2K: automatic address list creation > > > Given enough $ there's a tool to do everything. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Uso [mailto:usofwd@;gmx.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:49 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: E2K: automatic address list creation > > > > > > Hi, > > > > is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view > > similar to Exchange 5.5 Address Book views? I have a list of > > over 10,000 Contacts of our sister companies that we had > > viewed in Exchange 5.5 in view like: Company Name -> Site -> > > Department -> Divison I can't find a way to do that > > automatically in E2K, I have to create each container > > separately. Is there a third party tool that can do that? > > > > Regards > > > > Uso > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advice on infrastructure design
Gotta love corporate politics. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Veld, Paul [mailto:PVeld@;csr.com.au] > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design > > > You'd like working here then! If a site has more than 10 > people, we have to > put in an Exchange server. If only I could convince them to > put all that > extra money into my bank account instead :-). > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] > Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 1:13 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design > > > No. Move the mailboxes to your central site, and save the > cost of 5 Exchange > servers. > > I have had plenty of 20 person offices hitting Exchange > across WAN links > without issue. In fact, I have 2 offices going half way > across Europe, with > 30 users each, to the only office there that can support > Exchange (from an > admin standpoint). > > Personally, I think a server for less than about 40-50 users > is insane. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design > > > > > > Hi > > > > Very few to be honest, at our head office we have something > > like 30 users, > > then each site has around 10-15 > > > > Am I correct in assuming mailboxes need to be moved to our > > central server > > first, then the sites created, then the mailboxes moved back? > > > > Thanks > > > > Nik > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] > > Sent: 10 October 2002 15:41 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design > > > > > > Good point > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:27 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Advice on infrastructure design > > > > > > > > > I agree, but am curious as too how many users at each site? > > > Do you really > > > need one at each location. > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 7:40 AM > > > Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design > > > > > > > > > > Switch to x.400 connectors. There is precious little > > > difference, at the > > > > network level, between Site Connectors and intrasite > > > communications - they > > > > both rely entirely on RPC connectivity, which frankly > blows across > > > unstable > > > > or tempermental WANs. > > > > > > > > Alternately (since you'd need to own Enterprise to use > > > x.400 connectors), > > > > you could also use the IMS as your connector, but I find > > > x.400 easier to > > > use > > > > for connector purposes. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > > > [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:26 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: Advice on infrastructure design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish > > > > > question to ask, but I think we need to revise our > > setup, and are > > > > > not in a position to hire a > > > > > consultant. > > > > > > > > > > Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL > > > > > links, using Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities. > > > > > > > > > > Our Exchange Setup is 1 site with 5 servers. We've > had the odd > > > > > problem in the past when the ADSL links have gone down, and > > > > > messages have been lost. > > > > > Not often, but once or twice > > > > > > > > > > It was suggested to me here that we should configure > > each server > > > > > as residing in a different site, and configure site connectors > > > > > > > > > > I now have an issue where one server experiences massive > > > delays when > > > > > delivering messages to other servers (8 hours in some
RE: E2K: automatic address list creation
I find him most useful. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K: automatic address list creation "Can be"??? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm@;wlkmmas.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 7:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: E2K: automatic address list creation > > > I can be a tool... > > --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: E2K: automatic address list creation > > > Given enough $ there's a tool to do everything. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Uso [mailto:usofwd@;gmx.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:49 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: E2K: automatic address list creation > > > > > > Hi, > > > > is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view > > similar to Exchange 5.5 Address Book views? I have a list of > > over 10,000 Contacts of our sister companies that we had > > viewed in Exchange 5.5 in view like: Company Name -> Site -> > > Department -> Divison I can't find a way to do that > > automatically in E2K, I have to create each container > > separately. Is there a third party tool that can do that? > > > > Regards > > > > Uso > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
Its especially handy around the kitchen. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't send attachment with mail ESEUTIL fixes everything. How long have you been doing this William? You should know this by now. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't send attachment with mail You don't run eseutil to fix permission problems, Daniel? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't send attachment with mail Oh, yes, let's automatically blame the server. And while we're at it, let's run the utilities willy-nilly and see if something changes. What OS are the workstations running? Does this happen with _all_ clients, or just the ones who are complaining? Has it ever worked? What changed? -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:niko_n@;mail.tel-aviv.gov.il] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't send attachment with mail Hi all, We are using Exchange 5.5 Server with Service Pack 4(NT Server 4.0 with Service pack 4) On Client end we are using Outlook 97, 2000 Now the problem is that we cant send attachment with mails. The error when we tried to send attachment is following: "you don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation" "failed operation" I try run ISINTEG -FIX -PRI(PUB) -TEST ALLTESTS and ESEUTIL /R but it is not resolve problem Thanks in advance Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
But they can send large attachments? So, out of the blue this happened? -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:niko_n@;mail.tel-aviv.gov.il] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Can't send attachment with mail All my clients can't send small attachments also (20kb) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
Is the business going to accept the store being down overnight while the database files are being xcopied to another server? -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Thanks, sound like an interesting solution. I think whatever we do, the chances are we are going to lose a days email, and the business is probably prepared to accept that. I will do some digging on it. Cheers Greg -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) I had a similar setup at my old place. We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from exch server to itself over night. However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot was a mirror of the exch server. that way, when (and it did) the exch server went down, I simply took out the exch server and booted the backup (used netdom to remove and add the servers to the network)into its secondary config. Ran isinteg patches etc and voila was online in about an hour or so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server on its own network separate from the production network, then if the production server fails, you simply move the DR server to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too. Brian -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it "fred_bloggs" for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc
RE: Changing Mail Servers
Can you tell me how you set it up? Based on Chris's post, I didn't think it was possible. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:Paul.Hurst@;eu.sony.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Vincent, Actually we have two different domains in one of our Exchange sites and we can 'move mailbox' OK (there is a trust though between the two) between the servers. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone@;ibiquity.com] Sent: 22 October 2002 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Is it safe to assume that you are unable to move mailboxes from one Exchange server in one domain to another Exchange box in a different domain? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Do I have to DO anything for that to work? It doesn't seem to work. Do I have to disable the old account? Should I reread Ed's method? My original server is using Associated Accounts to the new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris King [mailto:Cking@;whitneyhawks.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers As long as the original server is still online it should tell the client that the mailbox is now homed on the other server, and the client's profile will be updated accordingly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-311248@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers The new server is on another domain. 2. Bring up a new Windows 2000 server in the same AD domain as the existing server. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida@;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers If you followed Ed's Method it will. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone@;ibiquity.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Really? I don't think 2000 will change the profile on the fly. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards@;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers I think Exchange is intuitive enough to change the servername automagically, if you are talking about changing it in the profile for the User on their machines. At least Exchange 5.5 was intuitive enough to know that if I moved Users from Server A to Server B, the User did not have to do anything. The servername in the profile got changed on the fly. If I am way off the actual topic, I apologize. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Just thought of this one. If you moved people from one server to another then you will most likely have to touch each workstation. - Original Message - From: "Vincent Avallone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Yes I can what? How should I change the name? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Yes you can. As long as all your workstations are the same. But you should have done it so it would have been transparent to the users. - Original Message - From: "Vincent Avallone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Changing Mail Servers Thanks to all your help, my new Exchange 2000 email server is up and running pretty smoothly so far. When it is time to go live, what are your suggestion on how to change the server name on my clients? I thought there may be a registry entry that I can use regini with and change it, but I haven't been able to find it yet. There i
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
And you've restored from your last good backup/ replayed the transaction logs? It's 24 hours later, if the data in the database is actualy worth anything, you're 12 hours late (or more) in calling PSS. If the data in the database isn't worth anything, delete the database and start over again. Oh.. btw, if you're running some shit antivirus software like PantyShield for Exchange, remove it(completely and totally.. feel free to follow the 20 page long set of manual uninstall instructions) before you call PSS. -Original Message- From: Niko To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 1:21 AM Subject: Re: Can't send attachment with mail All my clients can't send small attachments also (20kb) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
Well that is the £1m question really.. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida@;vss.com] Sent: 23 October 2002 13:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Is the business going to accept the store being down overnight while the database files are being xcopied to another server? -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Thanks, sound like an interesting solution. I think whatever we do, the chances are we are going to lose a days email, and the business is probably prepared to accept that. I will do some digging on it. Cheers Greg -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) I had a similar setup at my old place. We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from exch server to itself over night. However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot was a mirror of the exch server. that way, when (and it did) the exch server went down, I simply took out the exch server and booted the backup (used netdom to remove and add the servers to the network)into its secondary config. Ran isinteg patches etc and voila was online in about an hour or so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server on its own network separate from the production network, then if the production server fails, you simply move the DR server to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too. Brian -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it "fred_bloggs" for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents.
RE: Public Folder Anti-Delete Permission
Still confused. I'll remain blissfully ignorant though. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 4:08 AM Subject: RE: Public Folder Anti-Delete Permission Chris, The reference is too multi-site PF's that have PF's from different sites owning the different sub-folders as the PF tree grows. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: 22 October 2002 23:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Anti-Delete Permission Hmm.. I've never had that problem. How does one get that problem? > Looks like a lot of Exchange admins are having similar > problems with users deleting folders. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
Hrmm... a subject I actually know quite a bit about. So, leaving the pimp hat in the closet, there are a number of possible methods for moving the data across the WAN. Products such as double-take (and other high availability solutions listed at www.mail-resources.com in the high availability portion of the web links section) as well as snapshot style solutions I haven't had a chance to list yet, exist to potentially aid in this endeavor. -Original Message- From: Andy David To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 7:07 AM Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Is the business going to accept the store being down overnight while the database files are being xcopied to another server? -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Thanks, sound like an interesting solution. I think whatever we do, the chances are we are going to lose a days email, and the business is probably prepared to accept that. I will do some digging on it. Cheers Greg -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) I had a similar setup at my old place. We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from exch server to itself over night. However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot was a mirror of the exch server. that way, when (and it did) the exch server went down, I simply took out the exch server and booted the backup (used netdom to remove and add the servers to the network)into its secondary config. Ran isinteg patches etc and voila was online in about an hour or so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server on its own network separate from the production network, then if the production server fails, you simply move the DR server to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too. Brian -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it "fred_bloggs" for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
I suspect none of them use xcopy! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Hrmm... a subject I actually know quite a bit about. So, leaving the pimp hat in the closet, there are a number of possible methods for moving the data across the WAN. Products such as double-take (and other high availability solutions listed at www.mail-resources.com in the high availability portion of the web links section) as well as snapshot style solutions I haven't had a chance to list yet, exist to potentially aid in this endeavor. -Original Message- From: Andy David To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 7:07 AM Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Is the business going to accept the store being down overnight while the database files are being xcopied to another server? -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Thanks, sound like an interesting solution. I think whatever we do, the chances are we are going to lose a days email, and the business is probably prepared to accept that. I will do some digging on it. Cheers Greg -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) I had a similar setup at my old place. We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from exch server to itself over night. However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot was a mirror of the exch server. that way, when (and it did) the exch server went down, I simply took out the exch server and booted the backup (used netdom to remove and add the servers to the network)into its secondary config. Ran isinteg patches etc and voila was online in about an hour or so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server on its own network separate from the production network, then if the production server fails, you simply move the DR server to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too. Brian -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it "fred_bloggs" for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000
I can make it happen. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 Maybe it didn't happen! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 this is very elusive. I can't reproduce this *under normal cirumstances*, i.e. create a user account with mailbox, create another user account without a mailbox, create a group, mail-enabled it, add both user accounts to the group, send a test message to the group. The groups that do not work are built like this: - each customer has a separate OU - inside the customer OU there are all the user accounts and group accounts for the customer. - each customer has a global security group AllUsers@[customer.com] and every customer's user account is automatically added to the group. The group is mail-enabled. - Each customer has an account called Service (UserPrincipalName=Service@[customer.com]), Service is also a member of AllUsers@[customer.com] group. Service account does not have a mailbox. - Messages sent to AllUsers@[customer.com] get stuck in "Awaiting Directory Lookup" queue. - If I create a mailbox for Service, messages flow normally. If I delete the mailbox, messages get stuck again. We have a few thousand customers, so there are a few thousand groups called AllUsers@[customer.com], and each group has its own Service user as a member. I wonder if the categorizer runs out of steam trying to resolve the correct Service without a mailbox out of thousands. Although the UPN clearly states which one is which... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 crap... I can't reproduce this behavior on my corporate Exchange 2000 environment. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 I just hope that when I call PSS, they would be able to escalate and fix it. We rely on global security groups that need to be mail-enabled, and our hosting architecture uses a windows account that's a member of these groups but is not mail-enabled. I do not want to mail-enable this account because we then would pay Exchange license fees for it to Microsoft (each customer has an account like that). -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm@;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 Good job.. And thanks for sharing.. Simple solutions are often at the bottom of the list of things to try. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 This has been a nagging issue for a long time. I have not been able to send mail to certain groups - messages would just get stuck in the Retry Queue "Awaiting Directory Lookup". This was also coincidental with IIS memory leak. I can't believe how simple the cause of the problem is! The groups that experience problems are mail-enabled global security groups AND some members of the group are not mail-enabled. That's all. I have been looking at all other things trying to solve the problem. I thought that for some reason there was a duplication of an SMTP address somewhere (actually that used to be another bug in earlier version of Exchange 2000) or maybe the LegacyExchangeDN was screwed up... I can't believe it did not occur to me to check all the group's members to see if any of them were somehow different. Now we do have a reason for having such mixed groups for customer provisioning methods. Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST http://www.innerhost.com P.S. please consider this bug officially claimed by Andrey Fyodorov, the founder of the Scientific Jiggle Method and the Scientific Poking Around method. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: ht
RE: "unable to render this view" error
Get him to clear out his IE cache. We found this started happening with IE6, and while we never spent a great deal of time on it, we never did find out the root cause. > -Original Message- > From: brenda [mailto:xp@;myrealbox.com] > Posted At: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:27 AM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: "unable to render this view" error > Subject: "unable to render this view" error > > > we have an Exchange server 5.5 SP3 (my company is afraid to > upgrade to SP4 > - but I guess this is another story). and we use IIS on 2000 > server for outlook webacess to that server one of our users > while trying to read his mail via OWA is getting this > error:"unable to render this view" other users don't report > any problem. even this user don't have this problem all the > time. most of the time everything works but every few days > for few hours he is getting this error. and then it disappear > again. any idea how can we fix it? thanks in advance Brenda > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resource mailbox
I have recently set up a mailbox on an E2k server in an Exchange mixed mode site(sp3) as a resource mailbox for a conference room. When a user sends to the mailbox using Outlook xp or Outlook 2000, the meeting books properly and all is just dandy - ie, the user gets confirmation that the meeting was booked and it is placed in the resource mailbox's calendar. However, when an Outlook 98 client associated with an Exchange 5.5 (sp4 with hotfixes) mailbox creates the meeting, although he gets a confirmation that the meeting was booked, when you look inside the resource mailbox's calendar, the meeting does not exist. Does anyone know if this is a problem using Outlook 98 clients in this configuration, or if someone is aware of a fix/setting change for this? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resource mailbox
Sounds like you're doing auto-booking; OL98 doesn't support that. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:jbeeler@;nb.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resource mailbox I have recently set up a mailbox on an E2k server in an Exchange mixed mode site(sp3) as a resource mailbox for a conference room. When a user sends to the mailbox using Outlook xp or Outlook 2000, the meeting books properly and all is just dandy - ie, the user gets confirmation that the meeting was booked and it is placed in the resource mailbox's calendar. However, when an Outlook 98 client associated with an Exchange 5.5 (sp4 with hotfixes) mailbox creates the meeting, although he gets a confirmation that the meeting was booked, when you look inside the resource mailbox's calendar, the meeting does not exist. Does anyone know if this is a problem using Outlook 98 clients in this configuration, or if someone is aware of a fix/setting change for this? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
More than likely they don't use xcopy :-) but this was in a small firm of less than 80 users/ mailboxes so the files were not actually that large - can't remember the exact size. It meant that the store was only down for an hour or so - maybe less. So depending on the business, this could be seen as acceptable. If memory serves me, we wrote 3 batch files, 1 to stop exch services, 1 to start exch services and the main one with all the xcopy commands and some other bits (eg postie). Stupidly I didn't take a copy of them with me when I left -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida@;vss.com] Sent: 23 October 2002 13:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) I suspect none of them use xcopy! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Hrmm... a subject I actually know quite a bit about. So, leaving the pimp hat in the closet, there are a number of possible methods for moving the data across the WAN. Products such as double-take (and other high availability solutions listed at www.mail-resources.com in the high availability portion of the web links section) as well as snapshot style solutions I haven't had a chance to list yet, exist to potentially aid in this endeavor. -Original Message- From: Andy David To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 7:07 AM Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Is the business going to accept the store being down overnight while the database files are being xcopied to another server? -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) Thanks, sound like an interesting solution. I think whatever we do, the chances are we are going to lose a days email, and the business is probably prepared to accept that. I will do some digging on it. Cheers Greg -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) I had a similar setup at my old place. We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from exch server to itself over night. However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot was a mirror of the exch server. that way, when (and it did) the exch server went down, I simply took out the exch server and booted the backup (used netdom to remove and add the servers to the network)into its secondary config. Ran isinteg patches etc and voila was online in about an hour or so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server on its own network separate from the production network, then if the production server fails, you simply move the DR server to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too. Brian -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it "fred_bloggs" for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immed
Calender Permissions
Hello Friends, Current config: 2 sites one running exchange2000 and sp2, the other 5.5 and sp4. The problem is: A user on ex2000 (outlook xp/outlook 2002) cannot give permissions to a client on exchange 5.5. Error message received: "Non-local users cannot be given rights on this server." The same error message is received when assigning permissions from 5.5 to 2000. There are no problems with permissions with ex2000 to ex2000. Any ideas where i should start troubleshooting..? Thanks in advance. Kishore Vara Server Engineer PinkRoccade at T-Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 8214 2949 NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any reliance upon its contents. We cannot accept liability for any breaches of confidence arising through use of email. Any opinions expressed in this email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect our opinions. We will not accept responsibility for any commitments made by our employees outside the scope of our business. We do not warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 ost synch
I've seen this happen in the following situation: Users had large messages, or lots of messages with attachments AV running on the Exchange server (Trend Scanmail 3.5 in the case I've seen) Move users to new server - synching would fail because the AV check of the large messages would cause sufficient delay to confuse the synch into behaving as though the connection had been lost. If this fits your situation, the solution is to shut off AV on the Exchange server long enough for all users to synch. Or, have them move any large messages off to a .pst folder. Darcy -Original Message- From: Craig A. Mills [mailto:craigam@;camnetwork.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 ost synch I have two Exch 5.5 sites where every user receives synch errors, usually to the inbox and sent folders. Its not at the client. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resource mailbox
Not sure what booking method you are using, but Simpler-Webb has a product called the Exchange Resource Manager which is reasonably priced and much more full featured than the other direct booking options I am aware of. Mention my name and get my standard 0% discount. > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:jbeeler@;nb.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:47 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Resource mailbox > > > I have recently set up a mailbox on an E2k server in an > Exchange mixed mode site(sp3) as a resource mailbox for a > conference room. When a user sends to the mailbox using > Outlook xp or Outlook 2000, the meeting books properly and > all is just dandy - ie, the user gets confirmation that the > meeting was booked and it is placed in the resource mailbox's > calendar. > > However, when an Outlook 98 client associated with an > Exchange 5.5 (sp4 with hotfixes) mailbox creates the > meeting, although he gets a confirmation that the meeting was > booked, when you look inside the resource mailbox's calendar, > the meeting does not exist. > > > Does anyone know if this is a problem using Outlook 98 > clients in this configuration, or if someone is aware of a > fix/setting change for this? > > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Database Location
As long as you put something there that's a dead weight and is not excessively being read all the time. And as long as it does not use up 99.999% of the space. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Database Location I disagree. Point anything else you want to the RAID 5 volume EXCEPT the information store transaction logs. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Database Location make sure you don't point anything else at the RAID5 volume. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone@;ibiquity.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Database Location I am just about finished with setting up my new Exchange 2000 server on the new domain. I have created an 18igig partition for my logs and OS and a 36gig RAID 5 for my database. The only thing I have on the RAID 5 is the .edb and the .stm. As you can tell I am still learning. Is there anything else I need to point to the RAID 5 drive? Thanks for the patience. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need Help w/Public Folder
Win2K, E2k Enterprise SP2 native mode I'm trying to set up our Human Resources public folder to send an auto reply acknowledgement of resume submission. The public folder is mail enabled and I enabled auto reply under Global Settings/Internet Mail Format. I set up a rule in the public folder to reply with a message template. I receive the auto reply internally but not externally. What am I missing? Any help is greatly appreciated as I am new to administering Exchange. TIA, Melissa Burgess IT Specialist Hampton Roads Transit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need Help w/Public Folder
Be sure that you have given the anonymous access the ability to create items otherwise you will have problems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Address Book Listings
> > Change the display name format to last name, first name. > I'm feeling really stupid today. Where? Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Address Book Listings Change the display name format to last name, first name. > -Original Message- > From: Todd Boynton [mailto:tboynton@;maine.edu] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Address Book Listings > > > When a user is creating new mail and clicks on To... to bring > up the address book to add names to the message, Is there an > easy way to have names sorted by last name, first name > instead of the display name? > > Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000 > > Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ==Communications Specialist > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > == Maine School and Library Network > ==University of Maine System > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need Help w/Public Folder
The anonymous account has contributor permissions. Do I need to change this? -Original Message- From: Jason Coleman [mailto:jcoleman@;lrn.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need Help w/Public Folder Be sure that you have given the anonymous access the ability to create items otherwise you will have problems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resource mailbox
Thanks guys. I figured that was the case - with the ol98 client. And I'll be sure to use that discount, thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "unable to render this view" error
Err, try searching the KB before posting. It can be very helpful. Try Q184304. Or do another search on :unable to render this view." Geoff... -Original Message- From: brenda [mailto:xp@;myrealbox.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: "unable to render this view" error we have an Exchange server 5.5 SP3 (my company is afraid to upgrade to SP4 - but I guess this is another story). and we use IIS on 2000 server for outlook webacess to that server one of our users while trying to read his mail via OWA is getting this error:"unable to render this view" other users don't report any problem. even this user don't have this problem all the time. most of the time everything works but every few days for few hours he is getting this error. and then it disappear again. any idea how can we fix it? thanks in advance Brenda _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contacts view:
Thanks Chris, I kinda tweaked it using the Q article 305361 and my users are satisfied with the result. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Contacts view: Add them all to the To line and remove the ones they don't need. Or hack the outlib(?) dll to add the functionality back. > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:RPILLAI@;dancona.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:04 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Contacts view: > > > > Hi Guys, > > We recently migrated to Exchange 2000 sp3 (enterprise) and > OL-XP on the client side. > > In Outlook 98 when you create a new message, click To: and > change to Contacts, all the contacts are listed with e-mail, > business fax and the Like listed to the side of the name. Is > there a way to make that happen in Outlook XP. Currently all > the user is seeing is the name listed 5 times And they are > having to guess which one is the one they need, or they have > to scroll way over to the right. > > I looked at Q305361, but is there a better way? > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need Help w/Public Folder
Enable autoreplies ot the internet or use a server side script instead of a rule. The latter being more preferable in my mind. > -Original Message- > From: Melissa Burgess [mailto:mburgess@;hrtransit.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Need Help w/Public Folder > > > > Win2K, E2k Enterprise SP2 native mode > > I'm trying to set up our Human Resources public folder to > send an auto reply acknowledgement of resume submission. The > public folder is mail enabled and I enabled auto reply under > Global Settings/Internet Mail Format. I set up a rule in the > public folder to reply with a message template. I receive > the auto reply internally but not externally. What am I > missing? Any help is greatly appreciated as I am new to > administering Exchange. > > TIA, > > Melissa Burgess > IT Specialist > Hampton Roads Transit > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Address Book Listings
No need to feel stupid, Microsoft has made it difficult to do at best... See Q250455. > -Original Message- > From: Todd Boynton [mailto:tboynton@;maine.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Address Book Listings > > > > > > Change the display name format to last name, first name. > > > > I'm feeling really stupid today. Where? > > Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > == Communications Specialist > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > == Maine School and Library Network > ==University of Maine System > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Address Book Listings > > Change the display name format to last name, first name. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Todd Boynton [mailto:tboynton@;maine.edu] > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:56 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Address Book Listings > > > > > > When a user is creating new mail and clicks on To... to bring > > up the address book to add names to the message, Is there an > > easy way to have names sorted by last name, first name > > instead of the display name? > > > > Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000 > > > > Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ==Communications Specialist > > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > > == Maine School and Library Network > > ==University of Maine System > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Address Book Listings
Try this one to see if it works. Never tried though. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q277717 - Original Message - From: "Todd Boynton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:58 AM Subject: RE: Address Book Listings > > Change the display name format to last name, first name. > I'm feeling really stupid today. Where? Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Address Book Listings Change the display name format to last name, first name. > -Original Message- > From: Todd Boynton [mailto:tboynton@;maine.edu] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Address Book Listings > > > When a user is creating new mail and clicks on To... to bring > up the address book to add names to the message, Is there an > easy way to have names sorted by last name, first name > instead of the display name? > > Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000 > > Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ==Communications Specialist > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > == Maine School and Library Network > ==University of Maine System > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resource mailbox
Maybe you could trade-in your Ol98 to get a better discount. What's the KBB value on Ol98? -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:jbeeler@;nb.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resource mailbox Thanks guys. I figured that was the case - with the ol98 client. And I'll be sure to use that discount, thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendar events
I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to just send the update to them. An idea's? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar events
User error. > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Calendar events > > > I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a > change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation > notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both > messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation > notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to > just send the update to them. An idea's? > > Thank you, > > Alex Gonzalez > Senior Systems Administrator > Handleman Company > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar events
Did he by any chance remove the others users from the "to" and/or "cc" lists before he sent it? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar events I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to just send the update to them. An idea's? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar events
Generally I would say yes but not this time. I saw it happen and I don't understand it. It is showing that he sent cancellations to all the other users that were on the meeting at the same time he was sending the updates. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events User error. > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Calendar events > > > I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a > change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation > notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both > messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation > notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to > just send the update to them. An idea's? > > Thank you, > > Alex Gonzalez > Senior Systems Administrator > Handleman Company > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar events
No he was actually just adding the users to the meeting in the scheduling tab. -Alex -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events Did he by any chance remove the others users from the "to" and/or "cc" lists before he sent it? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar events I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to just send the update to them. An idea's? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar events
IIRC, if he was editing a calendar item already sent, and removed the Users he did not want to receive the updated item, it would send them a cancellation message. Like I said, IIRC. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events No he was actually just adding the users to the meeting in the scheduling tab. -Alex -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events Did he by any chance remove the others users from the "to" and/or "cc" lists before he sent it? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar events I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to just send the update to them. An idea's? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Forms with Outlook 2002 (preview pane).
Thanks, I went with Chilton preview to solve the problem. Another lame "security" feature in OL 2002. I thought there might be an easier reg hack to simply have Outlook display the messages. -Warren > > You could use a custom preview pane extension instead of the > built in one. As mentioned in the article, the use of > vbscript is a non-factor in the Outlook 2002 version of the > preview pane. Or you could simply implement the workaround > mentioned in the article. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Warren Cundy [mailto:warrenc@;yaletech.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Custom Forms with Outlook 2002 (preview pane). > > > > > > We use some custom forms here, and we are looking to upgrade > > to Office XP. Unfortunately, Outlook 2002 has a problem with > > custom forms, at least as far as displaying them in the > > preview pane, see here for details: > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q288754 > > Is there a way around this issue? I've looked around > slipstick.com, but can't see anything. How have others dealt > with this annoyance? > > We don't use VBScript in our forms.. > > Thanks > > -Warren > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
PantyShield? That must be a new one. Where do you get it? I would love to submit that one to my boss. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Posted At: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:34 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Can't send attachment with mail Subject: RE: Can't send attachment with mail And you've restored from your last good backup/ replayed the transaction logs? It's 24 hours later, if the data in the database is actualy worth anything, you're 12 hours late (or more) in calling PSS. If the data in the database isn't worth anything, delete the database and start over again. Oh.. btw, if you're running some shit antivirus software like PantyShield for Exchange, remove it(completely and totally.. feel free to follow the 20 page long set of manual uninstall instructions) before you call PSS. -Original Message- From: Niko To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 1:21 AM Subject: Re: Can't send attachment with mail All my clients can't send small attachments also (20kb) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
He needs to wear something underneath the pink sundress. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't send attachment with mail PantyShield? That must be a new one. Where do you get it? I would love to submit that one to my boss. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Posted At: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:34 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Can't send attachment with mail Subject: RE: Can't send attachment with mail And you've restored from your last good backup/ replayed the transaction logs? It's 24 hours later, if the data in the database is actualy worth anything, you're 12 hours late (or more) in calling PSS. If the data in the database isn't worth anything, delete the database and start over again. Oh.. btw, if you're running some shit antivirus software like PantyShield for Exchange, remove it(completely and totally.. feel free to follow the 20 page long set of manual uninstall instructions) before you call PSS. -Original Message- From: Niko To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 1:21 AM Subject: Re: Can't send attachment with mail All my clients can't send small attachments also (20kb) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
not just confidential......
So not only did they block my message due to Chris's colorful metaphor, BUT there is a confidentiality message at the end!!! Wow. So the automated ScanMail mailbox sends confidential mail. hm. So do they quarantine them so the admins can go back and read all the naughty words later? -Original Message- From: WC System Attendant [mailto:WCEXCHANGE2-SA@;baf.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:40 PM To: Ali Wilkes (IT) Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken. Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Ali Wilkes (IT) Subject = RE: Can't send attachment with mail Delivery Time = October 23, 2002 (Wednesday) 09:39:47 Policy = Dirty Words Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: The content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Please see http://policiesweb.baf.com/Misc/ElectronicCommunication.doc for further details. If this is a business critical email, you can contact the Helpdesk at x4357 in Walnut Creek. __ This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar events
Right but he swears up and down that is not the case. He showed me the process he was doing and the only thing he did was add users and ask Outlook to only send to those users. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards@;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events IIRC, if he was editing a calendar item already sent, and removed the Users he did not want to receive the updated item, it would send them a cancellation message. Like I said, IIRC. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events No he was actually just adding the users to the meeting in the scheduling tab. -Alex -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events Did he by any chance remove the others users from the "to" and/or "cc" lists before he sent it? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar events I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to just send the update to them. An idea's? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL information
Is there a way to export the owner? I have to associate an owner with all of the DLs. Ken Hatley, MCSE Messaging Consolidation VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 Office 972.997.9261 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL information In the first (and only) line of the export file, list the attributes you want to export. You probably want: Display Name,Directory Name,Members if you're exporting distribution lists, and if you're exporting users, add the attribute "Member Of" (no quotes). You can just take the first line of any file you export and add the attributes you want to it, then export again. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL information Sorry if this is a repeat post, I first posted on the web and have not seen it yet. I need to gather DL information for 6 Exchange 5.5 Orgs and was wondering if anyone knows of a good tool. I ran the extract in the administrative console, but that only gives Alias, SMTP, and basic information. I am about to whip up a batch file that runs ONDL in the BORK to extract the members and numbers of members by plugging in the Aliases from the extract, but was wondering if anyone has a better solution. I am also supposed to get the owner of the DL, but I have not come up with an automated solution for that yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Ken Hatley, MCSE Messaging Consolidation VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 Office 972.997.9261 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: not just confidential......
Note the URL is an internal URL only... So to read the doc I had to first hack into their network. > -Original Message- > From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: not just confidential.. > > > So not only did they block my message due to Chris's colorful > metaphor, BUT there is a confidentiality message at the end!!! > > Wow. So the automated ScanMail mailbox sends confidential > mail. hm. > > So do they quarantine them so the admins can go back and read > all the naughty words later? > > > -Original Message- > From: WC System Attendant [mailto:WCEXCHANGE2-SA@;baf.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:40 PM > To: Ali Wilkes (IT) > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found > and action taken. > > > Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. > > Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions > Sender = Ali Wilkes (IT) > Subject = RE: Can't send attachment with mail > Delivery Time = October 23, 2002 (Wednesday) 09:39:47 > Policy = Dirty Words > Action on this mail = Quarantine message > > Warning message from administrator: > The content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Please > see > http://policiesweb.baf.com/Misc/ElectronicComm> unication.doc > for further details. If this is a business > critical email, you can contact the Helpdesk at x4357 in > Walnut Creek. > __ > __ > __ > > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential > information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is > protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should > delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution > of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly > prohibited. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL information
Yes. > -Original Message- > From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley@;bankofamerica.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: DL information > > > Is there a way to export the owner? I have to associate an > owner with all of the DLs. > > > Ken Hatley, MCSE > Messaging Consolidation > VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 > Office 972.997.9261 > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL information
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q169761 if anyone is interested Ken Hatley, MCSE Messaging Consolidation VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 Office 972.997.9261 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL information Yes. > -Original Message- > From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley@;bankofamerica.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: DL information > > > Is there a way to export the owner? I have to associate an > owner with all of the DLs. > > > Ken Hatley, MCSE > Messaging Consolidation > VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 > Office 972.997.9261 > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have a winner!
it appears Darcy was a winner of them there MEC session eval drawings.. twice! (and here we were just chucking those sheets under the chairs..) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't send attachment with mail
Seen something simular. It had nothing to do with the server.. I moved the temporary internet files (or whatever that particular system called it) to another disk. I think the registry had still a setting to drive C while the folder was moved to drive D. The first problem was reported about 2 months after I moved the folder.. It gave exactly the same errormessage you experienced. So.. perhaps you did something simular or it has something to do with IE settings. Anyway, you may need to look on another location then the server itself.. Other things to think about: set logging on the server to maximum, check the systemlog. If nothing helps try if it's fixed after a reboot :-) Bye, B. At 06:32 22-10-02 -0700, you wrote: Hi all, We are using Exchange 5.5 Server with Service Pack 4(NT Server 4.0 with Service pack 4) On Client end we are using Outlook 97, 2000 Now the problem is that we cant send attachment with mails. The error when we tried to send attachment is following: "you don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation" "failed operation" I try run ISINTEG -FIX -PRI(PUB) -TEST ALLTESTS and ESEUTIL /R but it is not resolve problem Thanks in advance Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SEND TO -> Mail Attachment lost
I have a user who has lost the ability to send a MS Word document from within word by using FILE -> SEND TO -> MAIL RECIPIENT (As Attachment) Will someone tell me how this can be restored? Thanks, Paul P.S. I have a MAPI email client (Outlook 2k) that use to send this no changes or upgrades to the system or Exchange that I aware or have done. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Address Book Listings
Doh, never mind. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Address Book Listings > > Change the display name format to last name, first name. > I'm feeling really stupid today. Where? Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Address Book Listings Change the display name format to last name, first name. > -Original Message- > From: Todd Boynton [mailto:tboynton@;maine.edu] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Address Book Listings > > > When a user is creating new mail and clicks on To... to bring > up the address book to add names to the message, Is there an > easy way to have names sorted by last name, first name > instead of the display name? > > Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000 > > Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ==Communications Specialist > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > == Maine School and Library Network > ==University of Maine System > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEND TO -> Mail Attachment lost
What happens when they try to? Do they get an error message or Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Paul Done [mailto:pdone@;csusb.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: SEND TO -> Mail Attachment lost > > > I have a user who has lost the ability to send a MS Word > document from within word by using > > FILE -> SEND TO -> MAIL RECIPIENT (As Attachment) > > Will someone tell me how this can be restored? > > Thanks, > Paul > > P.S. I have a MAPI email client (Outlook 2k) that use to send > this no changes or upgrades to the system or Exchange that I > aware or have done. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: We have a winner!
Yep. Actually, three times. They were giving away X-box games. Since I don't have an X-box, I took one game and "traded" the other two for the conference shirt. Yeah, yeah, I know. . . I traded two $50 games for a $30 shirt. I've still got one game that I'm willing to sell if anybody wants it, and it was worth it to get the shirt without having to be a vendor ho'. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault@;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: We have a winner! it appears Darcy was a winner of them there MEC session eval drawings.. twice! (and here we were just chucking those sheets under the chairs..) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: We have a winner!
Ahyou should have e-bay'ed the games -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: We have a winner! Yep. Actually, three times. They were giving away X-box games. Since I don't have an X-box, I took one game and "traded" the other two for the conference shirt. Yeah, yeah, I know. . . I traded two $50 games for a $30 shirt. I've still got one game that I'm willing to sell if anybody wants it, and it was worth it to get the shirt without having to be a vendor ho'. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault@;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: We have a winner! it appears Darcy was a winner of them there MEC session eval drawings.. twice! (and here we were just chucking those sheets under the chairs..) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: We have a winner!
Doesn't matter, really. It was a missed opportunity, but not a loss. Anyone want to buy the one I did get? NFL Fever 2003, online enabled. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: We have a winner! Ahyou should have e-bay'ed the games -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: We have a winner! Yep. Actually, three times. They were giving away X-box games. Since I don't have an X-box, I took one game and "traded" the other two for the conference shirt. Yeah, yeah, I know. . . I traded two $50 games for a $30 shirt. I've still got one game that I'm willing to sell if anybody wants it, and it was worth it to get the shirt without having to be a vendor ho'. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault@;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: We have a winner! it appears Darcy was a winner of them there MEC session eval drawings.. twice! (and here we were just chucking those sheets under the chairs..) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEND TO -> Mail Attachment lost
What has happened to the people who look things up in the KB or archives. Come on folks. What do you think they are there for? http://search.support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?Catalog=LCID%3D1033% 26CDID%3DEN-US-KB%26PRODLISTSRC%3DON&Product=&KeywordType=ALL&Titles=false&n umDays=&maxResults=25&withinResults=&Queryl=%22unable+to+mail+attachment+in+ Word%22&Query=%22unable+to+mail+attachment+in+Word%22&QuerySource=gsfxSearch _Query Probably will wrap. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Paul Done [mailto:pdone@;csusb.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEND TO -> Mail Attachment lost I have a user who has lost the ability to send a MS Word document from within word by using FILE -> SEND TO -> MAIL RECIPIENT (As Attachment) Will someone tell me how this can be restored? Thanks, Paul P.S. I have a MAPI email client (Outlook 2k) that use to send this no changes or upgrades to the system or Exchange that I aware or have done. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RBL's
Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. Darcy -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RBL's Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
OK thanks. What's everybody using? -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. Darcy -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RBL's Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Dumb Luck. -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's OK thanks. What's everybody using? -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. Darcy -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RBL's Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > Darcy > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RBL's > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
<> Good point. Thankfully, we were finally able to shift our outbound mail to a new set of IP's. No more phone calls to (l)admins who rely on vigilante-RBL's [1] and/or don't know how to use a white list. Darcy [1] Osirusoft and SPEWS -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > Darcy > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RBL's > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Ok please explain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > Darcy > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RBL's > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to comprehend its functionality? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > Darcy > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RBL's > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok please explain. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an > RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll > likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them > why RBL $foo is costing their company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
I recently had to fight a major battle with *multiple* domain admins who have decided to use either Osirusoft or SPEWS as the basis for SPAM blocking. /rant on/ Osirusoft advertises as a relay blocking service, but they also hook into the SPEWS level one list for SPAM blocking. You can try to contact Osirusoft if you feel they're blocking you in error, but they won't answer. SPEWS is a similar story. They are an aggressive anti-spam group. "That's good" you say? Wait. They have two levels of lists: level 1, which is advertised as known, confirmed spammers only. Then there's level 2, which is much more aggressive. They not only block known spammers, but also suspected spammers, and anyone *near* them in network-space and using the same ISP. Which means that if your IP is next to that of a known spammer, you may be on their level 2 list. They do this so that you, the innocent bystander, will complain to your ISP and hopefully get the spammer kicked off the air. And what if you can't do that? Too bad, so sad. . . go ahead and post to their newsgroup with your tale of woe, then duck because the $hit is gonna come flying at your head as a horde of self-righteous vigilantes call *you* names because your ISP has hosted a spammer and of course any decent netizen wouldn't do business with them. Since some, perhaps most, of us don't have any choice in the matter of our ISP, that's not a particularly helpful stance. AND (yes, there's more) if the SPEWS tactic of blacklisting neighboring ISP's on their level 2 list doesn't get the spammer off the air, they'll boost those neighboring IP's to the level 1 list. So, even though they *claim* that the level 1 list is confirmed spammers only, it ain't necessarily so. Now, add in the admins who've set up their systems to use Osirusoft/SPEWS who either can't or won't use safe lists (I've found lots of those in the last couple of months), and you find yourself spending a LOT of time on the phone talking with admins trying to convince them that you're not a spammer; helping your users figure out how to continue doing business with customers who can no longer receive email from your company; sometimes talking directly to those customers to see if *they* can help you bea^H^H^H^H^H^talk some sense into their network admin or ISP, etc. . . /rant off/ The moral of the story: RBL's are a good thing, but know the policies of the RBL that you're using or develop your own RBL, and know how to use a white list. Any questions? Darcy -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok please explain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > Darcy > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RBL's > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: RBL's
Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok please explain. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an > RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll > likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them > why RBL $foo is costing their company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL. The majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the implications of the functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it actually works or not. > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to > comprehend its functionality? > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an > RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll > likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them > why RBL $foo is costing their company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the > movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the > wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And > you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or > customer service request based on their say so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes > more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a > potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, > combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be > able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd > be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Never mind Darcy's previous message answered my question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok please explain. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the > movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the > wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And > you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or > customer service request based on their say so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes > more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a > potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, > combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be > able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd > be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Well, if you mean I convinced you that an RBL can be Really Bad (L)admininstration, yes, I'd say I answered it in depth and detail. Real-time Black List is what it actually stands for. And Chris can laugh at me if he wants - I had to ask the first time I saw it as an acronym. Darcy -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Never mind Darcy's previous message answered my question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok please explain. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: mail-abuse.org/rbl/. Seems like it might be a likely source given that it talks about mail. I'm not a fsckign mind reader; if you want me to know you searched google first then show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding history of posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response below, my assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, was more or less spot on. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a > time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made > especially for lovers of romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > rental place > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > report to > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > > so? > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more > > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than > a nice to > > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An > admin who > > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > > 3rd parties > > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > > join you > > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is > costing their > > > company business. > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > > EMS Sales Engineer > > > MessageOne > > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > > night and the > > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about > possibly" > > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives:
client connection question
Is it possible to set up Outlook to connect to two different mailboxes in different Orgs at the same time? I need to be able to switch back and forth and it is a pain to have to change the profile each timeor maybe a utility to change on the fly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Well let's all assume that we get the same results as you. Second why should I have to show my work to you before I post a message to the list. Shouldn't everyone check the web and the MS KB before they post a question? The only one that's an idiot is the one that makes assumptions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: mail-abuse.org/rbl/. Seems like it might be a likely source given that it talks about mail. I'm not a fsckign mind reader; if you want me to know you searched google first then show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding history of posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response below, my assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, was more or less spot on. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a > time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made > especially for lovers of romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > rental place > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > report to > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > > so? > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more > > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than > a nice to > > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An > admin who > > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > > 3rd parties > > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > > join you > > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is > costing their > > > company business. > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > > EMS Sales Engineer > > > MessageOne > > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > > night and the > > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about > possibly" > > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > > > ___
RE: RBL's
You show your work because that's what professionals do. Why should I assume that you've read the same KB articles specifically that I have or have tried the same search strings as I have? Since you want information from others, the onus is on you to provide sufficient data so as to retrieve the information you are requesting. Your inability to properly phrase a technical question is not a failing on my fault (although like Tenner's problem with the same skill, blame is most likely on public school education and/or too many lead paint chips as a child). http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Well let's all assume that we get the same results as you. > Second why should I have to show my work to you before I post > a message to the list. Shouldn't everyone check the web and > the MS KB before they post a question? The only one that's an > idiot is the one that makes assumptions. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: > mail-abuse.org/rbl/. Seems like it might be a likely source > given that it talks about mail. I'm not a fsckign mind > reader; if you want me to know you searched google first then > show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding history of > posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you > (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response > below, my assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, > was more or less spot on. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon > a time, on > > a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially > for lovers > > of romance. ... > > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS > > ASS > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > www.google.com? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > > and isn't a > > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > > rental place > > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > > report to > > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what > may be a > > > critical sales order or customer service request based on > their say > > > so? > > > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > > leave more > > > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than > > a nice to > > > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An > > admin who > > > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > > > completely suck might be able to use them to some level > of positive > > > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > > Chris Scharff > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > > > 3rd parties > > > > to provi
RE: RBL's
Well, it has been my experience that over 35% of the questions asked have been answered with something like the following, which tells me there are people that REFUSE to do ANY research before posting.. I myself think it is getting old.. EXAMPLES OF ACTUAL ANSWERS: Search technet for "open relay exchange 2000", follow the directions and make sure you aren't an open relay when you get it working. My guess is that your server will be an open relay after reading some of the previous posts. I assume your talking about incoming mail. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q324021 You should either reconsider your decision to have port 137 opened or install the latest Microsoft Security patch: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS02-045.asp -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well let's all assume that we get the same results as you. Second why should I have to show my work to you before I post a message to the list. Shouldn't everyone check the web and the MS KB before they post a question? The only one that's an idiot is the one that makes assumptions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: mail-abuse.org/rbl/. Seems like it might be a likely source given that it talks about mail. I'm not a fsckign mind reader; if you want me to know you searched google first then show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding history of posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response below, my assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, was more or less spot on. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on > a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers > of romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS > ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > rental place > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > report to > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > > so? > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more > > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than > a nice to > > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An > admin who > > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > > 3rd parties > > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > > join
RE: PF replication
I had a similar problem on a pair of test systems and never resolved it. I did not observe any replicated folders getting smaller, though; they just replicated x number of messages and then stopped. New messages would replicate. On the folder that lost messages over time, perhaps the age limits were not the same on the two systems?? A workaround that my support people suggested was to copy all the folders to a new branch of the public folder hierarchy and then replicate the copies. After all are copied, delete the original folders and move everything so that the hierarchy is back the way it was. I did enough of them to prove that it worked, but I had to stop partway through and do a backup to make room in the transaction log directory. I think when I do the production system I'll try your three-at-a-time method first. Chris Kindschi -Original Message- From: Jon Hill [mailto:JHill@;jennison.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF replication Is there a limit to the number of public folders one can replicate at any one time? I have maybe 400 PFs, all but ten of which were until recently homed on my 5.5 server. We'd like to get rid of the 5.5 box so we've been trying for several months now to replicate the folders to our E2K cluster. The first time we tried this I did all the folders at once: I used ESM to add the E2K server name in the Replicas tab of each top-level folder and I propagated changes to the children. Within a couple of days I noticed that some folders appeared emptier, and I soon confirmed that not only was replication not 100% successful, but some of the E2K replicas were actually *losing* data over time. One folder had 1281 items on the 5.5 server but 1235 on the E2K. Two days later the E2K server had 1201 items. Ten days later it had 50. Since only one user had the delete permissions, I knew I couldn't blame the users. I removed the E2K server from the Replicas tab, waited a day and tried again, this time changing replication priority to Urgent. Same result. I ran isintegs on the 5.5 and the E2K public stores and even replaced the E2K public store outright a couple of times. Nothing has helped. Then I tried doing smaller and smaller groups of folders with priority at Urgent and at Normal. Same result. Finally about a week ago I did one batch of 100 folders. After comparing 5.5 Admin's Public Folder Resources against ESM's Public Folder Instances, I determined that about 60 folders had fully replicated, so I removed the 5.5 replica from those folders. I then stopped and restarted replication on the remaining 40, and got about ten more. The next try netted four more, and since then I've been replicating three folders at a time, which has been successful but slow. Any ideas about what the problem might be? The E2K Cluster is running W2K AS SP2 and E2K SP3. The SRS server has W2K Server SP2 and E2K SP3. E2K SP3 has been applied to the AD Connector server as well. The 5.5 box is running NT4SP6a and E5.5 SP4. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
His ass really is righteous. But RBL was new to everyone here at one time or another. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the > movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the > wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And > you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or > customer service request based on their say so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes > more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a > potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, > combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be > able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd > be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: ht
RE: RBL's
Let's keep it clean, shall we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:
RE: RBL's
Yes, a clean ass is best. For the record, as covered at the Exchange Roadmap session at MEC in October, RBL will be supported in Titanium. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Let's keep it clean, shall we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www
RE: RBL's
"RBL will be supported in Titanium." Not according to Kathy Edens (of Microsoft) last Monday night. They might be setting up hooks to make it easier to use 3rd party RBL software, but she said they didn't have any immediate plans to do anything natively. Personally, if they do it with the right feature set, I'd like to have that capability native. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yes, a clean ass is best. For the record, as covered at the Exchange Roadmap session at MEC in October, RBL will be supported in Titanium. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Let's keep it clean, shall we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.sw
RE: RBL's
I found the following URL very helpful when trying to decipher some of the acronyms floating around the Internet that I didn't know the meaning of... http://www.ucc.ie/acronyms/ -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, if you mean I convinced you that an RBL can be Really Bad (L)admininstration, yes, I'd say I answered it in depth and detail. Real-time Black List is what it actually stands for. And Chris can laugh at me if he wants - I had to ask the first time I saw it as an acronym. Darcy -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Never mind Darcy's previous message answered my question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok please explain. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch
RE: RBL's
My wife thought so. She couldn't wipe the smile off her face after meeting Sharff. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's His ass really is righteous. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
I am sick and didn't shower today. Does that mean I cant post? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Let's keep it clean, shall we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECT
RE: RBL's
I guess it all depends on your definition of "supported". -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's "RBL will be supported in Titanium." Not according to Kathy Edens (of Microsoft) last Monday night. They might be setting up hooks to make it easier to use 3rd party RBL software, but she said they didn't have any immediate plans to do anything natively. Personally, if they do it with the right feature set, I'd like to have that capability native. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yes, a clean ass is best. For the record, as covered at the Exchange Roadmap session at MEC in October, RBL will be supported in Titanium. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Let's keep it clean, shall we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > __
RE: RBL's
Relaying Black List I guess -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone@;superioraccess.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's I am sick and didn't shower today. Does that mean I cant post? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Let's keep it clean, shall we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > night and the > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: h
RE: "unable to render this view" error
i did SEARCH! and this article was to old and not relevant to our problem. BTW i did all the fixes in that article BEFORE posting! thank you for your effort to find for us the article but in my case i Always check Technet and other resources before posting. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Typically I just sit here and read the posts and I have to admit I've learn a lot from the discussions. I can tell there are some experienced Admins here too, but there are some of us that work for smaller companies and we don't have the time to learn everything there is to know about Exchange administration. I consider myself a pretty good admin. I may not know everything there is to know about Exchange Administration, but I know where the knowledge bases and these kind of discussion lists are. A lot of us are trying to learn to be good Email Admins. I admit that there are some pretty bad questions that come across this list. I've said my two cents.. I don't care if anyone likes it or doesn't. I remember just getting into Exchange and trying to make sure I did everything just right so it didn't cause me serious headaches down the road. Thanks for listening.. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins@;amr-corp.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, it has been my experience that over 35% of the questions asked have been answered with something like the following, which tells me there are people that REFUSE to do ANY research before posting.. I myself think it is getting old.. EXAMPLES OF ACTUAL ANSWERS: Search technet for "open relay exchange 2000", follow the directions and make sure you aren't an open relay when you get it working. My guess is that your server will be an open relay after reading some of the previous posts. I assume your talking about incoming mail. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q324021 You should either reconsider your decision to have port 137 opened or install the latest Microsoft Security patch: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS02-045.asp -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well let's all assume that we get the same results as you. Second why should I have to show my work to you before I post a message to the list. Shouldn't everyone check the web and the MS KB before they post a question? The only one that's an idiot is the one that makes assumptions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: mail-abuse.org/rbl/. Seems like it might be a likely source given that it talks about mail. I'm not a fsckign mind reader; if you want me to know you searched google first then show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding history of posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response below, my assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, was more or less spot on. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on > a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers > of romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS > ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > rental place > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > report to > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > > so? > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more > > than
RE: OWA 2000 login prompt
Make sure basic authentication is turned on on the public virtual directory on the fe and be servers. Also, check the following file level permissions: Winnt\system32 Winnt\inetsrv Winnt\wbem Exchsrvr\exchweb Exchsrvr\res Authenticated Users should have R, RX, and List. Force the replacement of permissions on child objects so that it resets the permissions on the files in the directories. I've seen problems where permissions on some of the files are off from their parent folders. Jeff -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:retts@;harman.com] Posted At: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:07 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA 2000 login prompt Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt I'm curious - why do you ask if any of the public folders are on a cluster? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards@;watrust.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt No, None of the public folder are on clustered servers. Just one back-end server. -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:JMcBee@;cta.net] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt Are any of your public folders on clustered back-end servers? -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards@;watrust.com] Posted At: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:01 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: OWA 2000 login prompt Subject: OWA 2000 login prompt Hi, I have an annoying problem with our front-end OWA 2000. Everytime a user logs in and clicks on the folders view, it promps for authentication from "owa server name"."domain name".com. The only way to get past the login prompt is to either hit escape, which gives you a "Login failed or cancelled" error, or enter the OWA server's local administrator authentication. After you hit escape and ok, it works just fine though. I have this feeling it's a permissions problem, but I'm not sure on what. In Internet Services Manager, I have basic authentication checked on the Exchange virtual directory level and Anonymous Access (using the local IUSR_"Server Name" user) at the website level. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: RBL's
Here Here Gregory! I couldn't said it better myself. Some people forget that they were once beginners too!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-99077@;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Typically I just sit here and read the posts and I have to admit I've learn a lot from the discussions. I can tell there are some experienced Admins here too, but there are some of us that work for smaller companies and we don't have the time to learn everything there is to know about Exchange administration. I consider myself a pretty good admin. I may not know everything there is to know about Exchange Administration, but I know where the knowledge bases and these kind of discussion lists are. A lot of us are trying to learn to be good Email Admins. I admit that there are some pretty bad questions that come across this list. I've said my two cents.. I don't care if anyone likes it or doesn't. I remember just getting into Exchange and trying to make sure I did everything just right so it didn't cause me serious headaches down the road. Thanks for listening.. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins@;amr-corp.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, it has been my experience that over 35% of the questions asked have been answered with something like the following, which tells me there are people that REFUSE to do ANY research before posting.. I myself think it is getting old.. EXAMPLES OF ACTUAL ANSWERS: Search technet for "open relay exchange 2000", follow the directions and make sure you aren't an open relay when you get it working. My guess is that your server will be an open relay after reading some of the previous posts. I assume your talking about incoming mail. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q324021 You should either reconsider your decision to have port 137 opened or install the latest Microsoft Security patch: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS02-045.asp -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well let's all assume that we get the same results as you. Second why should I have to show my work to you before I post a message to the list. Shouldn't everyone check the web and the MS KB before they post a question? The only one that's an idiot is the one that makes assumptions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: mail-abuse.org/rbl/. Seems like it might be a likely source given that it talks about mail. I'm not a fsckign mind reader; if you want me to know you searched google first then show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding history of posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response below, my assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, was more or less spot on. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on > a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers > of romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS > ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > rental place > > last week?
RE: "unable to render this view" error
That puts you in the distinct minority of posters then. Join the elite few by showing your work and you too can have a gold star next to your name. Seriously, if you've tried something and it didn't work then you should include that information so those trying to help you don't cover old ground. It keeps you from being offended because you might think you're being patronized and it saves those who might want to respond to your post time in researching and eliminating possible causes. More work for you certainly, but it helps you to properly phrase your question and prevents those who might respond from listing every possible cause of the problem you're seeing. -Original Message- thank you for your effort to find for us the article but in my case i Always check Technet and other resources before posting. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Public Folder replication
I am in the process of migrating our Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000. All of the public folders are currently held on the 5.5 server. I have set up Public Folder replication between the two servers but after replicating once they will not replicate again. Consequently anybodires mailbox that has been moved to the new server can't see most of the public folders. Also we are getting several conflicts as well. I have set up a seperate connection agreement for Public Folders Any Ideas Lee _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an e-mail without an attachment. Currently everyone is running Windows XP and Office 2000 Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 Its got me stumped because some people do not have any problems... Any Help Appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Senior Network Engineer Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Cell: (864) 449-9912 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info The greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fall. -- Confucius _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New SMTP address generation in 5.5
We are adding a new email domain to our existing 5.5 org. What is the easiest way to automagically add the new "@newdomainname.org" to the existing users addresses? It looks like 2K has an address generation tool for such things but I can't find anything for 5.5. Any suggestions? Thanks! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
My Apologies if this Double Posts Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an e-mail without an attachment. Currently everyone is running Windows XP and Office 2000 Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 Its got me stumped because some people do not have any problems Any Help Appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Senior Network Engineer Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Cell: (864) 449-9912 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info The greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fall. -- Confucius _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New SMTP address generation in 5.5
We are adding a new email domain to our existing 5.5 org. What is the easiest way to automagically add the new "@newdomainname.org" to the existing users addresses? It looks like 2K has an address generation tool for such things but I can't find anything for 5.5. Any suggestions? Thanks! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Well said Gregory. I too work for a smaller company and am routinely faced with chanllenges which fall well outside my normal areas of 'expertise'[1]. Resources like this one and various others make my life much easier. Finding people who know more about a topic you need help in, and who are willing to share that expertise is a cause for joy. Those who, on this list or on others learn to properly frame their issues, research problems and then relay their quandry to their peers are already miles ahead of those who lack those skills even if they are further behind the curve in a certain topic area. There is a basic, fundamental toolset which all technical folks ought to have. It's fairly evident from this forum (and many, many others) that too few admins have a grasp of the fundamental tools required to do their jobs or, have grown sloppy in their maintenance and usage of said tools. I guess some people get offended when pointed back to their toolbox, but I for one enjoy exercising my basic skills as often and as thoroughly as possible. It's amazing what one can learn sometimes by doing so. Course when all else fails, deja.com or the archives are a good source of info. [1] If only my cow-orkers asked more questions about porn. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 7:27 PM Subject: RE: RBL's Typically I just sit here and read the posts and I have to admit I've learn a lot from the discussions. I can tell there are some experienced Admins here too, but there are some of us that work for smaller companies and we don't have the time to learn everything there is to know about Exchange administration. I consider myself a pretty good admin. I may not know everything there is to know about Exchange Administration, but I know where the knowledge bases and these kind of discussion lists are. A lot of us are trying to learn to be good Email Admins. I admit that there are some pretty bad questions that come across this list. I've said my two cents.. I don't care if anyone likes it or doesn't. I remember just getting into Exchange and trying to make sure I did everything just right so it didn't cause me serious headaches down the road. Thanks for listening.. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Nor could I after meeting her. What an amazing woman. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 6:53 PM Subject: RE: RBL's My wife thought so. She couldn't wipe the smile off her face after meeting Sharff. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's His ass really is righteous. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
If only Martin hadnt slept through his wedding night. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Nor could I after meeting her. What an amazing woman. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/23/2002 6:53 PM Subject: RE: RBL's My wife thought so. She couldn't wipe the smile off her face after meeting Sharff. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's His ass really is righteous. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
