RE: MTA Error after deleting server
Yes, I did check this. It basically means the server is down, which I know as I deleted it What I wanted to know was why it was apparently still trying to communicate with a server that it should know has been removed from the organisation -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 00:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Error after deleting server http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318&source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Error after deleting server We have moved some users from a remote Exchange Server to our central server at head office, and deleted the server using Exchange Administrator However, I'm getting the following MTA errors in Event Viewer every 10 mins on the central server where the mailboxes are now located Event ID: 9318 Source: MSExchangeMTA Type: Warning Category: Interface Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Blah blah Can anyone suggest why it would be trying to talk to a server that I just deleted from exchange admin on that server Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange 5.5/SP4 and Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running with all services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an idle backup software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when in fact it isn't doing much at all. Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Speaking from past experience, yes. -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Hi all, Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no backups are running? Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Faxing
Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VBS_SLUG.B
Goood Morning All, I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10 users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are in the same folder and same file. This is one of the messages that i recieved, Virus Alert!! VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain. Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22 Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed) I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match on this virus. I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap. I told them that I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server. So how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their program (office scan). Has anyone seen this virus before. I also scanned all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no notifications of them being infected. RGDS RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VBS_SLUG.B
And Symantec only has http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/dyn/33762.html David Morrow Network Administrator Autodata Solutions Company Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part." This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 3, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VBS_SLUG.B Goood Morning All, I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10 users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are in the same folder and same file. This is one of the messages that i recieved, Virus Alert!! VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain. Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22 Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed) I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match on this virus. I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap. I told them that I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server. So how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their program (office scan). Has anyone seen this virus before. I also scanned all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no notifications of them being infected. RGDS RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing
I did some research on the same subject here at our work...even though we have not implemented to date, the product from Captaris seemed the bestit is pretty expensive though...check it out... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing
There is a whole slew of fine fax SW out there. Faxpress, Faxmaker, FacSys, etc. What kind of problems did you have before that you would like to avoid? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing I did some research on the same subject here at our work...even though we have not implemented to date, the product from Captaris seemed the bestit is pretty expensive though...check it out... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP Server on Exchange Server
Has anyone ever experienced any problems with running a DHCP server on an Exchange server? Windows 2000, SP3; Xch 5.5, Sp4 One small local scope with 70 ip leases. I dont see anything wrong on the surface. Any bad experiences or knowledge? Much Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server site backup exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with a spectra logic library now, easy living. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange 5.5/SP4 and Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running with all services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an idle backup software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when in fact it isn't doing much at all. Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Speaking from past experience, yes. -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Hi all, Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no backups are running? Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VBS_SLUG.B
Seems to be a variant of Kournikova - see http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/lists/slug/2001/February/msg00605.html Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VBS_SLUG.B And Symantec only has http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/dyn/33762.html David Morrow Network Administrator Autodata Solutions Company Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part." This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 3, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VBS_SLUG.B Goood Morning All, I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10 users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are in the same folder and same file. This is one of the messages that i recieved, Virus Alert!! VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain. Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22 Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed) I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match on this virus. I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap. I told them that I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server. So how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their program (office scan). Has anyone seen this virus before. I also scanned all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no notifications of them being infected. RGDS RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing
It's been so long ago, I can't even remember now. I know we were using Faxination at the time. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing There is a whole slew of fine fax SW out there. Faxpress, Faxmaker, FacSys, etc. What kind of problems did you have before that you would like to avoid? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing I did some research on the same subject here at our work...even though we have not implemented to date, the product from Captaris seemed the bestit is pretty expensive though...check it out... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP Server on Exchange Server
> Has anyone ever experienced any problems with running a DHCP > server on an Exchange server? Windows 2000, SP3; Xch 5.5, Sp4 > One small local scope with 70 ip leases. Keep in mind that Microsoft Small Business Server runs a whole slew of network services on the same machine, including Exchange. I have several small (5-25 user) businesses set up with Exchange on a Domain Controller running DNS, DHCP, etc. without any problems. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing
Do Faxpress, Faxmaker and FacSys tie in with the Exchange server, or do they need their own server? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing There is a whole slew of fine fax SW out there. Faxpress, Faxmaker, FacSys, etc. What kind of problems did you have before that you would like to avoid? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing I did some research on the same subject here at our work...even though we have not implemented to date, the product from Captaris seemed the bestit is pretty expensive though...check it out... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
I think you'll find anti-BE sentiment is kinda rare around these parts. I suppose you meant "just did *not* cut it" which is surprising as its handling a 150+ server environment here very well, and I can't recall the last time a fellow sysadmin stated a dislike for the product. On the flipside, I'm showing my ignorance by noting that I'd never heard of "commvault galaxy" and "spectra logic" until now :) What features did you find compelling over BE? s > -Original Message- > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server > site backup > exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with a spectra > logic library > now, easy living. > > -Original Message- > From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange > 5.5/SP4 and > Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running with all > services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an > idle backup > software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when in fact > it isn't doing > much at all. > > Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. > > > -Original Message- > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > Speaking from past experience, yes. > > -Original Message- > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > Hi all, > Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage > when no backups > are running? > > Johnny > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing
I think they all have an Exchange flavor. I have used Faxmaker with Exchange and was quite pleased. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing Do Faxpress, Faxmaker and FacSys tie in with the Exchange server, or do they need their own server? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing There is a whole slew of fine fax SW out there. Faxpress, Faxmaker, FacSys, etc. What kind of problems did you have before that you would like to avoid? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing I did some research on the same subject here at our work...even though we have not implemented to date, the product from Captaris seemed the bestit is pretty expensive though...check it out... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eseutil
Can someone help me with this error. When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. Operation terminated with error -1019 (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. Thank Tony N. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: eseutil
How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: eseutil > Can someone help me with this error. > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > Operation terminated with error -1019 (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > Thank > Tony N. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I still get the same error. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: eseutil How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: eseutil > Can someone help me with this error. > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > Operation terminated with error -1019 (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > Thank > Tony N. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information store from this one and then move the users back? Or, more specifically what have they suggested? > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I > still get the same error. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: eseutil > > > How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM > Subject: eseutil > > > > Can someone help me with this error. > > > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > > > Operation terminated with error -1019 > (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > > Thank > > Tony N. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
You didn't push for escalation? What makes you think that we can do better than the people who have the source code? Never, EVER, let a PSS call die without a resolution. You paid for it, you deserve the full treatment PSS offers up to and including final escalation (if necessary). -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I still get the same error. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: eseutil How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: eseutil > Can someone help me with this error. > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > Operation terminated with error -1019 (JET_errPageNotInitialized, > Repair > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > Thank > Tony N. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
If money weren't an object, I'd likely be using CommVault at all of my customers sites. BE is a nice balance for the features and performance for a lot of shops though. > -Original Message- > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I think you'll find anti-BE sentiment is kinda rare around > these parts. I suppose you meant "just did *not* cut it" > which is surprising as its handling a 150+ server environment > here very well, and I can't recall the last time a fellow > sysadmin stated a dislike for the product. > > On the flipside, I'm showing my ignorance by noting that I'd > never heard of "commvault galaxy" and "spectra logic" until > now :) What features did you find compelling over BE? > > s > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:20 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > > > We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server site > > backup exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with > a spectra > > logic library now, easy living. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > > > Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange > > 5.5/SP4 and > > Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running > with all > > services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an idle > > backup software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when > in fact it > > isn't doing much at all. > > > > Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > > > Speaking from past experience, yes. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > Hi all, > > Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no > > backups are running? > > > > Johnny > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
I have backup but I don't know when was the last good backup on tape. Just found this error a couple of week ago. They have ask me to build a recovery server and run eseutil /d /ispriv. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information store from this one and then move the users back? Or, more specifically what have they suggested? > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I > still get the same error. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: eseutil > > > How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM > Subject: eseutil > > > > Can someone help me with this error. > > > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > > > Operation terminated with error -1019 > (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > > Thank > > Tony N. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
I usually pay for the full treatment. Wait, wrong list... > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: eseutil > > > You didn't push for escalation? What makes you think that we > can do better > than the people who have the source code? Never, EVER, let a > PSS call die > without a resolution. You paid for it, you deserve the full > treatment PSS > offers up to and including final escalation (if necessary). > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: eseutil > > > I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I > still get the same > error. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: eseutil > > > How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM > Subject: eseutil > > > > Can someone help me with this error. > > > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > > > Operation terminated with error -1019 (JET_errPageNotInitialized, > > Repair > > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > > Thank > > Tony N. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
And? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil I have backup but I don't know when was the last good backup on tape. Just found this error a couple of week ago. They have ask me to build a recovery server and run eseutil /d /ispriv. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information store from this one and then move the users back? Or, more specifically what have they suggested? > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I > still get the same error. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: eseutil > > > How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM > Subject: eseutil > > > > Can someone help me with this error. > > > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > > > Operation terminated with error -1019 > (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > > Thank > > Tony N. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
Now I am working off the recovery server and it giving me the same error as the production server. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil And? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil I have backup but I don't know when was the last good backup on tape. Just found this error a couple of week ago. They have ask me to build a recovery server and run eseutil /d /ispriv. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information store from this one and then move the users back? Or, more specifically what have they suggested? > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I > still get the same error. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: eseutil > > > How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM > Subject: eseutil > > > > Can someone help me with this error. > > > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > > > Operation terminated with error -1019 > (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > > Thank > > Tony N. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
How big is your environment I mean how hard would it be to set up a new server and move the people to it? Its not really that daunting of a task. J -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil I have backup but I don't know when was the last good backup on tape. Just found this error a couple of week ago. They have ask me to build a recovery server and run eseutil /d /ispriv. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information store from this one and then move the users back? Or, more specifically what have they suggested? > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I > still get the same error. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: eseutil > > > How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM > Subject: eseutil > > > > Can someone help me with this error. > > > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > > > Operation terminated with error -1019 > (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > > Thank > > Tony N. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
You weren't by chance using the open file agent were you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server site backup exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with a spectra logic library now, easy living. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange 5.5/SP4 and Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running with all services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an idle backup software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when in fact it isn't doing much at all. Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Speaking from past experience, yes. -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Hi all, Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no backups are running? Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing
We use the eFax service offered by Star Internet. www.star.co.uk We send and receive FAX's via email. It is simple and very easy to use. It can be monitored and costs easily allocated.. You can send attachments. Incoming Fax's are received as either a .GIF or .TIFF. I believe the Service is available to anyone although they are our ISP. Kevan -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 15:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing I think they all have an Exchange flavor. I have used Faxmaker with Exchange and was quite pleased. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing Do Faxpress, Faxmaker and FacSys tie in with the Exchange server, or do they need their own server? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing There is a whole slew of fine fax SW out there. Faxpress, Faxmaker, FacSys, etc. What kind of problems did you have before that you would like to avoid? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing I did some research on the same subject here at our work...even though we have not implemented to date, the product from Captaris seemed the bestit is pretty expensive though...check it out... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material immediately. Whilst this email has been swept for viruses, you should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Oxford Natural Products plc accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception or interruption of this email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesea
RE: VBS_SLUG.B
All Symantec has is: http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/dyn/33762.html -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VBS_SLUG.B Seems to be a variant of Kournikova - see http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/lists/slug/2001/February/msg00605.html Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VBS_SLUG.B And Symantec only has http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/dyn/33762.html David Morrow Network Administrator Autodata Solutions Company Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part." This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 3, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VBS_SLUG.B Goood Morning All, I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10 users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are in the same folder and same file. This is one of the messages that i recieved, Virus Alert!! VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain. Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22 Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed) I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match on this virus. I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap. I told them that I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server. So how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their program (office scan). Has anyone seen this virus before. I also scanned all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no notifications of them being infected. RGDS RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: setting the default SMTP address for a mailbox
Thank you everyone. I had to wait for the changes to be replicated within the system. Everything is fine now. thanks again. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
It was taking our backup guy all day to manage it and we couldn't justify him, we didn't have a library at the time just DLT drives hanging off of every server. It really was a headache finding the right tape and having to wait for a catalog, of course that could as much be single DLT as it was BE. When the capital was approved to do it, it was decided to revamp the whole system. The thing we liked about CommVault the best was the full granularity for our SQL/Oracle, Exchange, and AD servers. It ran on a windows platform(net backup wanted us to buy 4 sun servers) and it was a java gui so I could VPN in from home or anywhere if there was a problem. The interface was also very easy to use, and I have nothing but A+ things to say about their support...especially at 3am when a server dies. The spectralogic runs a 225(expandable to 600+ in single footprint) AIT 3 tapes. We now make a backup, then a copy of that to keep for a few weeks, another copy to go into a onsite fire safe, another copy to go offsite, yet another for annual and bi-annual offsite. Bear in mind we are in the medical industry. To do all that with BE and single tapes would be a management nightmare. But of course this very spiffy backup system came with 6 digit price tag. I meant to say not. :) -Original Message- From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine I think you'll find anti-BE sentiment is kinda rare around these parts. I suppose you meant "just did *not* cut it" which is surprising as its handling a 150+ server environment here very well, and I can't recall the last time a fellow sysadmin stated a dislike for the product. On the flipside, I'm showing my ignorance by noting that I'd never heard of "commvault galaxy" and "spectra logic" until now :) What features did you find compelling over BE? s > -Original Message- > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server > site backup > exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with a spectra > logic library > now, easy living. > > -Original Message- > From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange > 5.5/SP4 and > Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running with all > services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an > idle backup > software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when in fact > it isn't doing > much at all. > > Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. > > > -Original Message- > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > Speaking from past experience, yes. > > -Original Message- > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > Hi all, > Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage > when no backups > are running? > > Johnny > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
I'm not really sure, wish I could tell you. It was almost 2 years ago and another guy was managing it. Sorry. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine You weren't by chance using the open file agent were you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server site backup exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with a spectra logic library now, easy living. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange 5.5/SP4 and Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running with all services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an idle backup software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when in fact it isn't doing much at all. Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Speaking from past experience, yes. -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Hi all, Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no backups are running? Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VBS_SLUG.B
Trend just released a new pattern file (401) in response to false positives of this virus. -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VBS_SLUG.B Seems to be a variant of Kournikova - see http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/lists/slug/2001/February/msg00605.html Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VBS_SLUG.B And Symantec only has http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/dyn/33762.html David Morrow Network Administrator Autodata Solutions Company Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part." This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 3, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VBS_SLUG.B Goood Morning All, I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10 users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are in the same folder and same file. This is one of the messages that i recieved, Virus Alert!! VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain. Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22 Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed) I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match on this virus. I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap. I told them that I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server. So how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their program (office scan). Has anyone seen this virus before. I also scanned all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no notifications of them being infected. RGDS RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
*poof* black hole. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
To quote Blue's Clues: "Periwinkle Dissapearo!" They drip into the bit bucket. Be sure to empty it regularly... Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DL Question
It goes to email heaven Timmy. - Original Message - From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM Subject: DL Question > What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? > > > TIA, > Joshua > > > > > > Joshua Morgan > Network Engineer > South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
It doesn't get delivered to anyone. -Peter -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
It is delivered to the members. > -Original Message- > From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has > no members? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
Well, in my test, it looks like its somewhere up where the space station is! Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
It goes to /dev/null, the bit bucket, a blackhole, call it what you like. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
ROTFL!! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DL Question It goes to email heaven Timmy. - Original Message - From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM Subject: DL Question > What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? > > > TIA, > Joshua > > > > > > Joshua Morgan > Network Engineer > South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Service Account Migration
All, Question. We are in the process of upgrading our NT 4.0 Domains to AD, as well as Exchange 5.5 to Exchange2K - actually in the lab environment now. We have 3 NT4.0 Account Domains. All Exchange servers are member servers in one of the 3 account domains. We have 3 exchange service accounts (1 in each account domain), all with the same name. Our AD Tree structure is to collapse all 3 account domains into 1 single AD domain. The problem is - how do we migrate 3 identical accounts from 3 different domains into a single account in the new domain? Or do we even need to worry about it - seeing how Exchange2K does not use a service account? TIA, BM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied. There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many instances of single instance storage are involved. If it is a client DL, then I think that the "poof" answer is pretty close. MAPI will not let you send it. If it is an Exchange DL in the same enterprise as the sender, then MAPI will send it to Exchange Server, and MSX will error it out. But is the GUID record in the store created? I don't now for sure, but probably yes. When does it get deleted? I don't know anyone that knows, but maybe not at all. Allmo0st certainly it exists in the store, in the sender's view (i.e. mailbox), as both a Sent Mail and some sort of Inbox error message from the system attendant. If it is to a DL not in the local Exchange enterprise, then it certainly exists in the senders store. What happens on the other end will be a function of how the system on the other end works. I don't think (here the rust may show a bit) that Exchange DLs are addressable from an SMTP header record (to, cc or bcc field), but hey I might have missed this one. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied. There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many instances of single instance storage are involved. If it is a client DL, then I think that the "poof" answer is pretty close. MAPI will not let you send it. If it is an Exchange DL in the same enterprise as the sender, then MAPI will send it to Exchange Server, and MSX will error it out. But is the GUID record in the store created? I don't now for sure, but probably yes. When does it get deleted? I don't know anyone that knows, but maybe not at all. Allmo0st certainly it exists in the store, in the sender's view (i.e. mailbox), as both a Sent Mail and some sort of Inbox error message from the system attendant. If it is to a DL not in the local Exchange enterprise, then it certainly exists in the senders store. What happens on the other end will be a function of how the system on the other end works. I don't think (here the rust may show a bit) that Exchange DLs are addressable from an SMTP header record (to, cc or bcc field), but hey I might have missed this one. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
Ok, that's neat. How do you discern the ascii string to the left of the @? MSX DL display names support spaces and special characters, which SMTP does not. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied. There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many instances of single instance storage are involved. If it is a client DL, then I think that the "poof" answer is pretty close. MAPI will not let you send it. If it is an Exchange DL in the same enterprise as the sender, then MAPI will send it to Exchange Server, and MSX will error it out. But is the GUID record in the store created? I don't now for sure, but probably yes. When does it get deleted? I don't know anyone that knows, but maybe not at all. Allmo0st certainly it exists in the store, in the sender's view (i.e. mailbox), as both a Sent Mail and some sort of Inbox error message from the system attendant. If it is to a DL not in the local Exchange enterprise, then it certainly exists in the senders store. What happens on the other end will be a function of how the system on the other end works. I don't think (here the rust may show a bit) that Exchange DLs are addressable from an SMTP header record (to, cc or bcc field), but hey I might have missed this one. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
Craig, Here's what I've found so far: Ex5.5 builds the SMTP Addy off of the Alias name, not the Display name. As soon as you put in the Alias name and flip over to the next page, it automatically builds the SMTP addy. I would assume it passes it using a %[Ascii code]% string, but I could be wrong. So far, I have found that if there are spaces, hyphens or ampersands, that it will remove the space and allow both of the other two. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question Ok, that's neat. How do you discern the ascii string to the left of the @? MSX DL display names support spaces and special characters, which SMTP does not. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied. There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many instances of single instance storage are involved. If it is a client DL, then I think that the "poof" answer is pretty close. MAPI will not let you send it. If it is an Exchange DL in the same enterprise as the sender, then MAPI will send it to Exchange Server, and MSX will error it out. But is the GUID record in the store created? I don't now for sure, but probably yes. When does it get deleted? I don't know anyone that knows, but maybe not at all. Allmo0st certainly it exists in the store, in the sender's view (i.e. mailbox), as both a Sent Mail and some sort of Inbox error message from the system attendant. If it is to a DL not in the local Exchange enterprise, then it certainly exists in the senders store. What happens on the other end will be a function of how the system on the other end works. I don't think (here the rust may show a bit) that Exchange DLs are addressable from an SMTP header record (to, cc or bcc field), but hey I might have missed this one. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
It just takes out all illegal characters, so a DL with an alias name of Corporate Contacts gets a default SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] As with regular mailboxes, this address can be changed later, or deleted entirely. Also, I don't think any NDRs are sent out when a message is sent to a memberless DL, no matter where it comes from. -Peter -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question Ok, that's neat. How do you discern the ascii string to the left of the @? MSX DL display names support spaces and special characters, which SMTP does not. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL Question Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied. There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many instances of single instance storage are involved. If it is a client DL, then I think that the "poof" answer is pretty close. MAPI will not let you send it. If it is an Exchange DL in the same enterprise as the sender, then MAPI will send it to Exchange Server, and MSX will error it out. But is the GUID record in the store created? I don't now for sure, but probably yes. When does it get deleted? I don't know anyone that knows, but maybe not at all. Allmo0st certainly it exists in the store, in the sender's view (i.e. mailbox), as both a Sent Mail and some sort of Inbox error message from the system attendant. If it is to a DL not in the local Exchange enterprise, then it certainly exists in the senders store. What happens on the other end will be a function of how the system on the other end works. I don't think (here the rust may show a bit) that Exchange DLs are addressable from an SMTP header record (to, cc or bcc field), but hey I might have missed this one. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
I'm sorry to disturb. I also use Veritas BE 8.6 but never seen this kind scenario. Use you Server Performance to detect the processor baseline and compare the time.. I've sent a new problem with new mail to Exchange Disscuss List but never receive, so need to use this email to sent my problem out. Sorry again. Exchange 5.5 ; Outlook 2000. Only 1 user having this problem. Sent out 1 email but receiver received 3-6 times repeated email. The time that receiver received was so far e.g. 3pm ; 5pm ; 9pm. I've sent to this receiver but they only received once. I've recreated this sender mailbox but it happened again.. Fews receiver having this problem and keep on complaint. Any clue ? Thanks Fioon -Original Message- From: Gian Bee Choo Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2002 11:22 AM To: Fioon Cc: Madeline Yeo; Tan Yew Koon Subject: FW: Celebrate Xmas and New Year at home with PFS Catering! for your info. regards, Bee Choo -Original Message- From: D& A Delaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:57 PM To: Gian Bee Choo Subject: Re: Celebrate Xmas and New Year at home with PFS Catering! Will you PLEASE stop send this garbage - this is the 6th time this evening. We're not interested - and this email is not appreciated. - Original Message - From: Gian Bee Choo Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:36 PM Subject: Celebrate Xmas and New Year at home with PFS Catering! -Original Message- From: Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 4:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Neither have I Are you using a MAPI client to notify you when backups are complete? - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 8:54 PM Subject: Re: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > Mine must be misconfigured. I havent ever seen that. > > - Original Message - > From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:16 PM > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > Speaking from past experience, yes. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > Hi all, > > Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no > backups > > are running? > > > > Johnny > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP Server on Exchange Server
I doubt you'll even see the impact at all. No problem with it. For an ASP customer I need to run Exchange 2000 and SQL 200 on one box, now that is a baddie. Those two apps both like mucho resources. Not impossible, but not first prise either. Cheers Sander -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 05:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DHCP Server on Exchange Server Has anyone ever experienced any problems with running a DHCP server on an Exchange server? Windows 2000, SP3; Xch 5.5, Sp4 One small local scope with 70 ip leases. I dont see anything wrong on the surface. Any bad experiences or knowledge? Much Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil
Well, that would figure when you copy a corrupted database to another machine. Bring up another new machine in the same site, and move all the mailboxes you can to it. After you have all the data out that you can get out of it, decide whether the old machine, especially the disk subsystem, is worthy of Exchange. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil Now I am working off the recovery server and it giving me the same error as the production server. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil And? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil I have backup but I don't know when was the last good backup on tape. Just found this error a couple of week ago. They have ask me to build a recovery server and run eseutil /d /ispriv. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information store from this one and then move the users back? Or, more specifically what have they suggested? > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I still get the > same error. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: eseutil > > > How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM > Subject: eseutil > > > > Can someone help me with this error. > > > > When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error. > > > > Operation terminated with error -1019 > (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair > > Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds. > > Thank > > Tony N. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Exchange Service Account Migration
It seems you answered your own question. Don't bother. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Service Account Migration All, Question. We are in the process of upgrading our NT 4.0 Domains to AD, as well as Exchange 5.5 to Exchange2K - actually in the lab environment now. We have 3 NT4.0 Account Domains. All Exchange servers are member servers in one of the 3 account domains. We have 3 exchange service accounts (1 in each account domain), all with the same name. Our AD Tree structure is to collapse all 3 account domains into 1 single AD domain. The problem is - how do we migrate 3 identical accounts from 3 different domains into a single account in the new domain? Or do we even need to worry about it - seeing how Exchange2K does not use a service account? TIA, BM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: The lights went out..
Morning all Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just had a full eclipse and it went pitch black. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The lights went out..
Solaris crashed again? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Morning all Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just had a full eclipse and it went pitch black. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The lights went out..
Could well be, but the real thing also went down...shitty UPS I s'pose. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2002 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The lights went out.. Solaris crashed again? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Morning all Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just had a full eclipse and it went pitch black. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The lights went out..
A rare and phenomenal experience to be treasured and respected. The real thing, that is. Exchange is still humming along, I bet... William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Could well be, but the real thing also went down...shitty UPS I s'pose. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2002 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The lights went out.. Solaris crashed again? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Morning all Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just had a full eclipse and it went pitch black. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The lights went out..
Exchange is way above trivial things like solar eclipses etc ...-) It didn't even blink. Sander -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2002 09:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The lights went out.. A rare and phenomenal experience to be treasured and respected. The real thing, that is. Exchange is still humming along, I bet... William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Could well be, but the real thing also went down...shitty UPS I s'pose. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2002 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The lights went out.. Solaris crashed again? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Morning all Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just had a full eclipse and it went pitch black. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
