RE: IIS/OWA failing?
I had something similar after upgrading virus scanner and I think it was fixed by reinstalling either the nt service pack or exchange sp4, sorry I can't remember which. Harriet -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2003 19:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS/OWA failing? I ran across this about 4 years ago. The solution was to uninstall OWA, reinstall OWA, then re apply the SP. Not sure if this would work for you but OWA on 5.5 sometimes would act strangely for no reason and this is what a call to MS did back then. I do remember after upgrading the hardware it went away, but that also included a complete rebuild of the server too. - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM Subject: IIS/OWA failing? Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 and 2000. We've been having problems with our Outlook Web Access and IIS failing. I have 3 systems now that are periodically failing. One is running NT 4.0 sp6a, and I can stop/restart the services and users still cannot get in. I have to reboot to get OWA to start and accept queries again. I do get an event 115 stating the service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code message. On two other systems with Windows 2000 SP3 and fully patched, the IIS just stops for no apparent reason and the IIS Admin Service restarts IIS using the iisreset.exe. I kind of recall someone stating that there may be a security patch that may have induced some problems to IIS/OWA? I also have the CDO patch q289606 installed and I also have McAfee excluding all Exchange directories as well as the c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv directories on the systems. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email Blackhole
My first guess is to look at the GWART and see what's showing as the actual options for SMTP message delivery (you can also look at the site addressing properties on the routing tab). That should tell you where the mail is going. Try forcing replication and then recalculating routing to see if the GWART changes. Pay particular attention to the address space assigned to the IMS, and also verify all IMS settings. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Brown, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Email Blackhole We have 1 Exchange Organisation. 5 Sites. In Site1 we have Exchange and Exchange1. I successfully moved all recipients, connectors, public folders etc from Exchange to Exchange1, including an Internet Mail Service. I made sure that mail was being sent from and received by Exchange1's IMS and the IMS on Exchange was idle. I stopped all the services on Exchange and left it like that for a few days. No problems, no lost email. On Monday morning I deleted Exchange from the Organisation. Since then all email from Site1 sent to the internet has disappeared without a trace, no bounce back, no errors in the error log. Using Message Tracking I can see that the messages have been submitted to the store, but haven't gone to the IMS. The IMS is still successfully receiving email. Other sites with their own IMS' have had no problems, and I can track their messages from Submitted to the store and getting to the IMS. I have temporarily enabled Site2 to send Internet email from the rest of the organisation, to get around this problem, but I don't particular want our Frame Relay link being hit by all the internet traffic from Site1. Any ideas? I'm guessing I should have deleted the IMS on Exchange before deleting it from the Organisation? Is there anyway I can fix this and get the emails that have been sent. Given I have a workaround at the moment I'm not stressing too much, although we have a number of disgruntled users that have to go through their sent items and forward sent emails to people that haven't received them. I'll be contacting PSS on Monday if no-one is able to suggest a solution. Thanks Mark Brown _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
I had all of that correct. It turns out I need the dn of an account that has read access to AD (which I thought was default for anyone). I originally put an account in, but not the accounts dn. Now that it is in, voila, it works. Thank for your replies. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD. Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe any DC would work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Delay
All, Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should I be worried? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. The list of email addresses are below. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill spammers DEAD!
Spamkillers seem to be spammers. I invite you to google them and look at the results Dale L. Orr Information Systems Security Specialist State Department http://infoassurance.irm.state.gov (202)203-5066 This e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions provided in E.O. 12958 Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:03:38 -0500 X-Message-Number: 8 It looks like people are using it... I just sent a message there to see what happens and here's the ndr that I got The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/2/2003 10:01 AM The message could not be delivered because the recipient's mailbox is full. mxsmta02.inithost.com #4.2.2 -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Kill spammers DEAD! Hi list, Does anybody know if these people are serious : http://www.spamkillers.net/ Thanks Freddie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: Drewery, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:05:31 - X-Message-Number: 9 I'd be a little wary. By submitting your spam to them you could just be giving them live email addresses to sell on. Ant. -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2003 14:52 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Kill spammers DEAD! Hi list, Does anybody know if these people are serious : http://www.spamkillers.net/ Thanks Freddie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of CP Ships. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the CP Ships Helpdesk at +44 (0) 1293 582 800. Further, we make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this email and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email. -- Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:07:29 -0800 X-Message-Number: 10 If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: Drew Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:11:26 -0600 X-Message-Number: 11
RE: Message Delay
Was there a DSN code with this message? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Bowles, John L. Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 3, 2003 07:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Message Delay All, Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should I be worried? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. The list of email addresses are below. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Delay
The DSN just said Delay in the subject. That's about it. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Delay Was there a DSN code with this message? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Bowles, John L. Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 3, 2003 07:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Message Delay All, Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should I be worried? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. The list of email addresses are below. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
Just curious, did this require a schema mod? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection I had all of that correct. It turns out I need the dn of an account that has read access to AD (which I thought was default for anyone). I originally put an account in, but not the accounts dn. Now that it is in, voila, it works. Thank for your replies. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD. Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe any DC would work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Groupwise forwarding to Exchange - OWA Problem
I have a user working at a customer site who has mail forwarded from an account on the customer's Groupwise server to our exchange server. She can read the mail fine when dialled in with Outlook, but no good with OWA. The mails appear as attachments called 'read.htm' and when she opens them it says 'the attachment is a type that is not yet supported''. Any ideas? Dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
No, it's just an ldap query. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Just curious, did this require a schema mod? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection I had all of that correct. It turns out I need the dn of an account that has read access to AD (which I thought was default for anyone). I originally put an account in, but not the accounts dn. Now that it is in, voila, it works. Thank for your replies. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD. Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe any DC would work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Delay
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1891.txt -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Delay All, Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should I be worried? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. The list of email addresses are below. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send As
All, Doing a Directory Export of the GAL, and need to grab everyone that has Send As permissions. The Obj-Users field grabs all the users with User permissions, but not just the Send As permission. Is there such a field for a Directory Export that will indeed grab Send As permissions??? TIA BM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Groupwise forwarding to Exchange - OWA Problem
Forward the messages as plain text, or convert them on the server via script. On 1/3/03 8:21, Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a user working at a customer site who has mail forwarded from an account on the customer's Groupwise server to our exchange server. She can read the mail fine when dialled in with Outlook, but no good with OWA. The mails appear as attachments called 'read.htm' and when she opens them it says 'the attachment is a type that is not yet supported''. Any ideas? Dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration
I believe both NetIQ and Quest may have products to do this after a fashion. On 1/3/03 0:08, Giardina, dhr. N.(ICTS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Guys ! Does anyone out there knows how to migrate server side malboxs attributes like inbox and agenda permissions, from exchange 5.5 on one forest ( actually running NT4 BDC) to exchange 2000 on another forest ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
By default, AD allows anonymous reads of AD info, but not searches. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection I had all of that correct. It turns out I need the dn of an account that has read access to AD (which I thought was default for anyone). I originally put an account in, but not the accounts dn. Now that it is in, voila, it works. Thank for your replies. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD. Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe any DC would work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
Just a side question. The last time I used a Digital Sender it was in a NT4.0/Exchange 5.5 environment. The only thing that was tricky was making sure the IP address of the unit was allowed to relay so a scanned image could be emailed. Has something changed with the newer units and when in a WIN2000/E2K setup? Just curious. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:28 PM Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection By default, AD allows anonymous reads of AD info, but not searches. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection I had all of that correct. It turns out I need the dn of an account that has read access to AD (which I thought was default for anyone). I originally put an account in, but not the accounts dn. Now that it is in, voila, it works. Thank for your replies. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD. Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe any DC would work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Going native in AD Exck2K
I have finally eradicated the last of my NT4 DCs and am thinking about native mode AD. I am starting to get the feeling though that making the switch may have an impact on my GAL and distribution lists. (I know it will have an impact on what I can do with dist lists but some comments in reading various Exchange resources indicate that it will affect my existing GAL and groups. I am running a single Exch2K server which is in Exch mixed mode as well. I have completed the migration from 5.5 (a couple of months ago) so I guess I could go Exchange native too. Am I reading something wrong? Do any of you know of anything I should look out for? Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Going native in AD Exck2K
What type of groups are your DL's? I know you meant User Groups. I think if you go to Native and your groups are not a certain type you may have some issues administrating them. I would have to look but I thought there was something regarding that. - Original Message - From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:51 PM Subject: Going native in AD Exck2K I have finally eradicated the last of my NT4 DCs and am thinking about native mode AD. I am starting to get the feeling though that making the switch may have an impact on my GAL and distribution lists. (I know it will have an impact on what I can do with dist lists but some comments in reading various Exchange resources indicate that it will affect my existing GAL and groups. I am running a single Exch2K server which is in Exch mixed mode as well. I have completed the migration from 5.5 (a couple of months ago) so I guess I could go Exchange native too. Am I reading something wrong? Do any of you know of anything I should look out for? Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Going native in AD Exck2K
Have you completely retired the SRS? Make sure that there are no gosts of SRS lurking around. I went from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 a while ago on our corporate network. Did everything by the book (retiring the last Exchange 5.5 server in the org, etc), switched everything to native. Everything went smoothly except there is a little problem - I cannot un-install Exchange 2000 servers from my organization. I can install additional Exchange 2000 servers but it would not let me un-install any, it says prerequisites are not met. The Exchange setup log shows that when I am trying to un-install an Exchange 2000 server it trips over some SRS-related stuff. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Going native in AD Exck2K I have finally eradicated the last of my NT4 DCs and am thinking about native mode AD. I am starting to get the feeling though that making the switch may have an impact on my GAL and distribution lists. (I know it will have an impact on what I can do with dist lists but some comments in reading various Exchange resources indicate that it will affect my existing GAL and groups. I am running a single Exch2K server which is in Exch mixed mode as well. I have completed the migration from 5.5 (a couple of months ago) so I guess I could go Exchange native too. Am I reading something wrong? Do any of you know of anything I should look out for? Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Going native in AD Exck2K
I believe that most of them were Exch5.5 Dist lists that got converted to AD Universal Dist groups in the migration to Exch2K. The only groups that appear in the GAL are in a folder called distribution lists inside the users container in AD - that was created by the ADC before the migration. I may have several that were created as Win2K Universal Dist groups as well but it seems to me that I have to put them in that folder before they show up in the GAL - does that sound right?. Thanks! Jeff -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Going native in AD Exck2K What type of groups are your DL's? I know you meant User Groups. I think if you go to Native and your groups are not a certain type you may have some issues administrating them. I would have to look but I thought there was something regarding that. - Original Message - From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:51 PM Subject: Going native in AD Exck2K I have finally eradicated the last of my NT4 DCs and am thinking about native mode AD. I am starting to get the feeling though that making the switch may have an impact on my GAL and distribution lists. (I know it will have an impact on what I can do with dist lists but some comments in reading various Exchange resources indicate that it will affect my existing GAL and groups. I am running a single Exch2K server which is in Exch mixed mode as well. I have completed the migration from 5.5 (a couple of months ago) so I guess I could go Exchange native too. Am I reading something wrong? Do any of you know of anything I should look out for? Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/Busy confusion
I have Exchange 2000 with multiple administrative groups. A bunch of mailboxes have been moved from a server that belongs to one administrative group to a server in another administrative group. It seems that some of these mailboxes want to continue using the Free/Busy system folder on the old server. And if that old server is not available, they get the error that their free/busy info cannot be updated. So I have to make sure that they can reach the old server or replicate the free/busy folder from the old administratice group to the new server. Is this weird or what? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC connector for 5.5
Hello, I'm testing migrating to E2k in our lab and I have a question regarding the ADC for 5.5. I have one org and one site with 3 servers in the site. One of the servers is in another domain. When I create an ADC for 5.5 it only allows me to select ORG-SITE-RECIPIENTS on the Exchange side and what I want to do is go down one more level to ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS. Is there a way to do this that I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector for 5.5
I haven't seen any situations that require a configuration like this. Why do you want to go to that level of detail? Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC connector for 5.5 Hello, I'm testing migrating to E2k in our lab and I have a question regarding the ADC for 5.5. I have one org and one site with 3 servers in the site. One of the servers is in another domain. When I create an ADC for 5.5 it only allows me to select ORG-SITE-RECIPIENTS on the Exchange side and what I want to do is go down one more level to ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS. Is there a way to do this that I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector for 5.5
I think you should be able to modify the properties of the CA using ADSIEdit. The attribute should be msExchServer2ExportContainer, and you'd enter the LDAP path to the specific server's Recipients container. Check Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design ISBN 182451 for more information on mucking around with the CA attributes. Not for the faint of heartbut that's what labs are for. Hunter -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC connector for 5.5 Hello, I'm testing migrating to E2k in our lab and I have a question regarding the ADC for 5.5. I have one org and one site with 3 servers in the site. One of the servers is in another domain. When I create an ADC for 5.5 it only allows me to select ORG-SITE-RECIPIENTS on the Exchange side and what I want to do is go down one more level to ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS. Is there a way to do this that I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector for 5.5
One of the Exchange servers in my site is in a different domain. and when I upgrade the Exchange server in my domain to E2K it creates disabled users in my domain for everyone in the other domain the exchange server is in since all of the users on that server have user accounts in that domain. The result is no one in the other domain can access their email since the disabled user is now the user associated with that email account. My thought is if I can create the ADC connection between my AD domain and the server recipients that are on the servers in my domain I wouldn't have this problem. Any thoughts? I know I don't explain myself very well so if you have other questions let me know. Thanks again, Mike. -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: ADC connector for 5.5 I haven't seen any situations that require a configuration like this. Why do you want to go to that level of detail? Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC connector for 5.5 Hello, I'm testing migrating to E2k in our lab and I have a question regarding the ADC for 5.5. I have one org and one site with 3 servers in the site. One of the servers is in another domain. When I create an ADC for 5.5 it only allows me to select ORG-SITE-RECIPIENTS on the Exchange side and what I want to do is go down one more level to ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS. Is there a way to do this that I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADC connector for 5.5
Well when you upgraded both domains, did you make the second domain a child domain? - Original Message - From: Mike Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:08 PM Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5 One of the Exchange servers in my site is in a different domain. and when I upgrade the Exchange server in my domain to E2K it creates disabled users in my domain for everyone in the other domain the exchange server is in since all of the users on that server have user accounts in that domain. The result is no one in the other domain can access their email since the disabled user is now the user associated with that email account. My thought is if I can create the ADC connection between my AD domain and the server recipients that are on the servers in my domain I wouldn't have this problem. Any thoughts? I know I don't explain myself very well so if you have other questions let me know. Thanks again, Mike. -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5 I haven't seen any situations that require a configuration like this. Why do you want to go to that level of detail? Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC connector for 5.5 Hello, I'm testing migrating to E2k in our lab and I have a question regarding the ADC for 5.5. I have one org and one site with 3 servers in the site. One of the servers is in another domain. When I create an ADC for 5.5 it only allows me to select ORG-SITE-RECIPIENTS on the Exchange side and what I want to do is go down one more level to ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS. Is there a way to do this that I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector for 5.5
I haven't upgraded the other domain, they are still on NT 4.0. There are plans to migrate their domain into our 2K domain but I'm not sure when this can be done. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: ADC connector for 5.5 Well when you upgraded both domains, did you make the second domain a child domain? - Original Message - From: Mike Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:08 PM Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5 One of the Exchange servers in my site is in a different domain. and when I upgrade the Exchange server in my domain to E2K it creates disabled users in my domain for everyone in the other domain the exchange server is in since all of the users on that server have user accounts in that domain. The result is no one in the other domain can access their email since the disabled user is now the user associated with that email account. My thought is if I can create the ADC connection between my AD domain and the server recipients that are on the servers in my domain I wouldn't have this problem. Any thoughts? I know I don't explain myself very well so if you have other questions let me know. Thanks again, Mike. -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5 I haven't seen any situations that require a configuration like this. Why do you want to go to that level of detail? Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC connector for 5.5 Hello, I'm testing migrating to E2k in our lab and I have a question regarding the ADC for 5.5. I have one org and one site with 3 servers in the site. One of the servers is in another domain. When I create an ADC for 5.5 it only allows me to select ORG-SITE-RECIPIENTS on the Exchange side and what I want to do is go down one more level to ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS. Is there a way to do this that I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy confusion
I have partially answered my own question - it has to do with the LegacyExchangeDN. I guess when a user gets moved from one server to another his/her LegacyExchangeDN does not change, even if the servers belong to different administrative groups. And it seems that LegacyExchangeDN determines which Free/Busy system folder that user is going to use. Is this a good design on Microsoft part? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy confusion I have Exchange 2000 with multiple administrative groups. A bunch of mailboxes have been moved from a server that belongs to one administrative group to a server in another administrative group. It seems that some of these mailboxes want to continue using the Free/Busy system folder on the old server. And if that old server is not available, they get the error that their free/busy info cannot be updated. So I have to make sure that they can reach the old server or replicate the free/busy folder from the old administratice group to the new server. Is this weird or what? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy confusion
It is probably not the intended design. Rather, it is probably a bit of deferred work that has been assigned a fairly low priority. There are a lot of ugly compromises in any complex product. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy confusion I have partially answered my own question - it has to do with the LegacyExchangeDN. I guess when a user gets moved from one server to another his/her LegacyExchangeDN does not change, even if the servers belong to different administrative groups. And it seems that LegacyExchangeDN determines which Free/Busy system folder that user is going to use. Is this a good design on Microsoft part? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy confusion I have Exchange 2000 with multiple administrative groups. A bunch of mailboxes have been moved from a server that belongs to one administrative group to a server in another administrative group. It seems that some of these mailboxes want to continue using the Free/Busy system folder on the old server. And if that old server is not available, they get the error that their free/busy info cannot be updated. So I have to make sure that they can reach the old server or replicate the free/busy folder from the old administratice group to the new server. Is this weird or what? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy confusion
Perhaps MS should have designed the move mailbox procedure in such a way that it would update the LegacyExchangeDN if mailbox is moved from one Admin Group to another. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy confusion It is probably not the intended design. Rather, it is probably a bit of deferred work that has been assigned a fairly low priority. There are a lot of ugly compromises in any complex product. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy confusion I have partially answered my own question - it has to do with the LegacyExchangeDN. I guess when a user gets moved from one server to another his/her LegacyExchangeDN does not change, even if the servers belong to different administrative groups. And it seems that LegacyExchangeDN determines which Free/Busy system folder that user is going to use. Is this a good design on Microsoft part? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy confusion I have Exchange 2000 with multiple administrative groups. A bunch of mailboxes have been moved from a server that belongs to one administrative group to a server in another administrative group. It seems that some of these mailboxes want to continue using the Free/Busy system folder on the old server. And if that old server is not available, they get the error that their free/busy info cannot be updated. So I have to make sure that they can reach the old server or replicate the free/busy folder from the old administratice group to the new server. Is this weird or what? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector for 5.5
ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS isn't a real recipient. It's sort of like an address book view. That's why what you want isn't supported; the data is not organized that way. ADC works directory-to-directory. I've read your other posts in this thread, and it's clear that you're not really understanding how all this works. In brief, you'd be a whole lot better off upgrading the other domain to Windows 2000 before trying to install Exchange for exactly the reasons you're seeing. That is, you must have recipient objects in Active Directory for all the mailboxes in Exchange 5.5. Exchange 2000 migrations really go a whole lot better when you've largely finished installing Active Directory first. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Newell Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC connector for 5.5 Hello, I'm testing migrating to E2k in our lab and I have a question regarding the ADC for 5.5. I have one org and one site with 3 servers in the site. One of the servers is in another domain. When I create an ADC for 5.5 it only allows me to select ORG-SITE-RECIPIENTS on the Exchange side and what I want to do is go down one more level to ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS. Is there a way to do this that I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forest prep question.
Your question is itself inaccurate. You have two choices; you can: - Join or upgrade an existing Exchange 5.5 organization, or - Create a new Exchange 2000 organization. Joining an existing Exchange 5.5 organization brings your new server up into an existing Exchange 5.5 site. You specify the site by specifying a server in that site. Since you've already installed ADC, this is probably the option you want to take because, unless your existing Exchange directory and information store is largely garbage, because you probably want to build upon what you already have. Creating a new organization basically says to start over. You can do some migration, with third-party tools or through free tools like Exmerge, but it's more work and you end up losing stuff. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Newell Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forest prep question. Hello, I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an existing site but this site is not in the Active Directory. I'm not sure if it's asking if I want to create a new site in AD or if I want to create a new Exchange Org and site. Sorry if this sounds lame but this is the first time running forestprep and I want to make sure I get it right. Thanks, Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA hosted exchange problem
Hello Group I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4 mailbox stores and 4 global address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they all come up when I do the preview. Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3 exchange enterp. Sp3 Any Ideas I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non hosted exchange problems. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA hosted exchange problem
Define group in The last group I set up. If this group has a different e-mail domain, is there an entry that corresponds to this group's e-mail domain in the default recipient policy? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA hosted exchange problem Hello Group I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4 mailbox stores and 4 global address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they all come up when I do the preview. Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3 exchange enterp. Sp3 Any Ideas I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non hosted exchange problems. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA hosted exchange problem
Ed what are you still doing up? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem Define group in The last group I set up. If this group has a different e-mail domain, is there an entry that corresponds to this group's e-mail domain in the default recipient policy? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA hosted exchange problem Hello Group I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4 mailbox stores and 4 global address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they all come up when I do the preview. Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3 exchange enterp. Sp3 Any Ideas I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non hosted exchange problems. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA hosted exchange problem
At 10pm on a Friday? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Ed what are you still doing up? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem Define group in The last group I set up. If this group has a different e-mail domain, is there an entry that corresponds to this group's e-mail domain in the default recipient policy? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA hosted exchange problem Hello Group I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4 mailbox stores and 4 global address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they all come up when I do the preview. Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3 exchange enterp. Sp3 Any Ideas I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non hosted exchange problems. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA hosted exchange problem
Basic I have OU called Hosting. Fron there I created 4 more OUs as domaina.com,domainb.com etc. Created UPN's for each Domainx.com Then crated 4 storage groups and 4 mailbox stores for each added users and groups for each OU Applied directory security to isolate each OU from each other Added global address list for each OU Set up msexchquerybasedn for OWA (so each hosted COmpany cannot see others address list) All this works except for last OU I did. I can login via outlook but not OWA Does this help? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem Define group in The last group I set up. If this group has a different e-mail domain, is there an entry that corresponds to this group's e-mail domain in the default recipient policy? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA hosted exchange problem Hello Group I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4 mailbox stores and 4 global address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they all come up when I do the preview. Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3 exchange enterp. Sp3 Any Ideas I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non hosted exchange problems. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA hosted exchange problem
Oh sorry it's 1:35 am here!! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem At 10pm on a Friday? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Ed what are you still doing up? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem Define group in The last group I set up. If this group has a different e-mail domain, is there an entry that corresponds to this group's e-mail domain in the default recipient policy? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA hosted exchange problem Hello Group I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4 mailbox stores and 4 global address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they all come up when I do the preview. Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3 exchange enterp. Sp3 Any Ideas I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non hosted exchange problems. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
