Re: Help With LDAP Query
On 2/28/03 17:38, "Adam Berns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a query that looks like this for use with RBDL: > > LDAP://mtvex00/o=TestOrg>;(&((objectClass=organizationalPerson))(postalAddre ss > =OverThere)(!givenName=CR*));cn,adspath;subtree > > > Now then, this works fine to add people to a DL. However, if I go in and > manually add an organizationalPerson who's postalAddress=OverThere, and > who's givenName does = CR*, it is not being removed. > > Any ideas? RBDL is inherently unreliable when it comes to removing addresses from lists (see archives for a bunch of my posts on using the product .. Somewhere in late 1999 I think). When I used it, I ran a script to remove all members from the list first, immediately followed by running RBDL to rebuild the DL. Used it each night around 2AM and there was a window of 20 minutes or so where the DLs were a bit in flux, hence the 2AM run time. AFAIK that script is still running at the company where I installed it and building the DLs nightly. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Limiting Amount Of Distribution List Members
Erik: I don't have a knowledge of that specific setting, but if it exists, I doubt that it is a registry setting, but rather an Active Directory setting since E2K uses AD groups for mail distribution. Wish I could give you a more specific answer, but maybe it will help just pointing you in the direction of AD. Jim -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Limiting Amount Of Distribution List Members Subject: Limiting Amount Of Distribution List Members Hi, I have found the information for the registry edit specific to limiting the max amount of recipients for Distribution Lists however is there not a setting in Exchange 2k? If so, where is it? I cannot find it at all. Thanks, Erik Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO Intel Systems Phone: 925-658-6161 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
Thanks that is what I needed to know. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5 On 2/28/03 17:40, "MSX dude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can get around the security prompt if you make the COM addin trusted > within the form in the public folder. I take it you haven't done this > then... > > http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm I'm aware of the functionality, but have not implemented it (and don't plan to). I much prefer the use of redemption, since it can get around all of the possible prompts AFAIK and isn't limited to just the XP client. The server based forms work with Exchange (all versions) and OpenMail I believe. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Limiting Amount Of Distribution List Members
Hi, I have found the information for the registry edit specific to limiting the max amount of recipients for Distribution Lists however is there not a setting in Exchange 2k? If so, where is it? I cannot find it at all. Thanks, Erik Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO Intel Systems Phone: 925-658-6161 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
On 2/28/03 17:40, "MSX dude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can get around the security prompt if you make the COM addin trusted > within the form in the public folder. I take it you haven't done this > then... > > http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm I'm aware of the functionality, but have not implemented it (and don't plan to). I much prefer the use of redemption, since it can get around all of the possible prompts AFAIK and isn't limited to just the XP client. The server based forms work with Exchange (all versions) and OpenMail I believe. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Option to send OoO to the internet
I believe that OoO responses are an 'All or Nothing' proposition. I don't think you can define some folks to be able to send them and others to *not* be able to send them. In my opinion, OoO responses are bad form as it is and should *never* be sent to the Internet. Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.myhomeoffice.org/ - New pictures of my kids here! -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Option to send OoO to the internet Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) Hi guys, I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet for certain Distribution groups in our org. ( not my choice, directive from the directors). I do not want to enable this for everyone so I am not checking the " Allow out of office responses" in Global Settings. But it does not seem to be working if you just enable OOO using exchange Advanced tab for distribution groups. If I turn on the global setting, it works for everyone, but that is not desirable. Any comments or ideas? Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªـÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §Ê&þȭzǚȱæ«r¬¥:.˛±Êâm隊[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-i٢Ì2G(
RE: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
You can get around the security prompt if you make the COM addin trusted within the form in the public folder. I take it you haven't done this then... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help With LDAP Query
I have a query that looks like this for use with RBDL: LDAP://mtvex00/o=TestOrg>;(&((objectClass=organizationalPerson))(postalAddress=OverThere)(!givenName=CR*));cn,adspath;subtree Now then, this works fine to add people to a DL. However, if I go in and manually add an organizationalPerson who's postalAddress=OverThere, and who's givenName does = CR*, it is not being removed. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
OK. I was wondering the same thing but decided not to open my mouth and blow it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions What does an Outlook Object Model Guard security prompt have to do with the admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5? .. Confused.. In any event... Tell your developers to use Redemption and be done with it. On 2/28/03 15:31, "MSX dude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone put these two together? I work with some developers that are > tired of seeing the "will you allow" dialog box and want to put a .dll in > their app to get around it. In reading the docs I don't see any reference > to the version of Exchange server they run it on and wanted to see if > anyone had installed this and if there are any pitfalls I need to avoid. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
What does an Outlook Object Model Guard security prompt have to do with the admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5? .. Confused.. In any event... Tell your developers to use Redemption and be done with it. On 2/28/03 15:31, "MSX dude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone put these two together? I work with some developers that are > tired of seeing the "will you allow" dialog box and want to put a .dll in > their app to get around it. In reading the docs I don't see any reference > to the version of Exchange server they run it on and wanted to see if > anyone had installed this and if there are any pitfalls I need to avoid. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
Has anyone put these two together? I work with some developers that are tired of seeing the "will you allow" dialog box and want to put a .dll in their app to get around it. In reading the docs I don't see any reference to the version of Exchange server they run it on and wanted to see if anyone had installed this and if there are any pitfalls I need to avoid. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Problems
something is screwed up about the Free/Busy system folder... When you are moving the users to Exchange 2000, are they staying in the same Admin group? or are they going to a new Admin group that you may have created? If they are going to the new Admin group, their Legacy Exchange DN is still referring to the old Admin group (5.5 Site) and that's where their Outlook tries to go in order to get the Free/Busy info - Outlook tries to find the old free/busy system folder. Similar stuff happened to me when I moved all users from one E2K server to another E2K server, and the servers were in different Admin groups. I then whacked the old server and started getting the same Free/Busy complaints/error that you are getting. In my case, there was a floating orphan of the old server's free/busy system folder, so I homed it on the new server and it seemed to have helped. You may want to see if you could replicate your old free/busy system folder to the new server. -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Problems Hi All, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction... We have begun migrating mailboxes from Ex5.5 to E2K using NetIQ. The organisations are different and mutilple admin groups exist in E2K. We have now moved 10 mailboxes and find that the free/busy is unavailable for all but one (my own as it happens). Ie, if anyone creates a meeting and looks at the schedule, the schedule is unavailable for every included mailbox, except their own and mine. The aim with the admin groups was to have one per region plus a backbone. Looking at Exchange Advanced tab of users I found that my account is in Oceania admin group but almost everyone else is in backbone. It appears the ADC has put most accounts in the Backbone Admin group - not sure why mine was different. All migrated mailboxes are placed on the same server in the Oceanic group so I would have expected them all to be in Oceania group. I've checked the legacyExchangeDN attribute (article 286783) and there's no problem regarding uppercase CN's etc, but the Admin group are generally listed as Backbone. I tried editing this but that broke access to the mailbox. Also, I found another account which IS in the Oceania admin group and that cannot be seen in free/busy either. On the client side, the users get 'cannot update free/busy schedule' when exiting outlook which really explains why there is no data available I guess. The OC Admin group has a Schedule+ public folder on our server, but the backbone Schedule+ is on a server overseas. Don't know if this makes any difference however. What would be nice at least is a method of finding out exactly WHAT Outlook is attempting to write too when it gives that error - ie, what server, which folder or whatever. At least then I could see what is different in my account compared to the others and then search a way to make them the same. BTW we're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2 - both Native mode. Client is WinXP SP1 and OL2002 (10.4219.4219 - SP2. We migrated from Ex 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP5 with clients of NT4 SP5 and OL98. Any help, suggestions etc. Oh, incidentally, created a fresh user and mailbox (ie not migrated) gives the same issue which I'm assuming rules out NetIQ and points to either a server issue (but I can't think what else to check) or client side (but I have someone use my machine to eliminate that). Cheers - Dave Lloyd Assistant IT Systems Team Manager IT Technical Services Rabobank Group Phone: +61 2 9234 4388 Fax: +61 2 9234 4874 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.rabobank.com.au This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments.We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. =
RE: Option to send OoO to the internet
SOL -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Option to send OoO to the internet Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) Hi guys, I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet for certain Distribution groups in our org. ( not my choice, directive from the directors). I do not want to enable this for everyone so I am not checking the " Allow out of office responses" in Global Settings. But it does not seem to be working if you just enable OOO using exchange Advanced tab for distribution groups. If I turn on the global setting, it works for everyone, but that is not desirable. Any comments or ideas? Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing Mailbox Store
Uninstall Exchange. Install Exchange. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing Mailbox Store I have a situation where I have two E2K systems, front-end, back-end. The (default) mailbox store was placed on a remote NAS, that is now gone. There was only one mailbox on it, that was used only for testing. Now I need to add users to this E2K system. But the Exchnage Mailbox Store/Public Store do not mount, and there is no M drive. So I get all types of errors about W3SVC not logging and services failing because there is no Virtual M: drive. I really dont need the old mailbox and store, but I do need to add some mailboxes to this server. The issue being when I create a new mailstore and try to mount it or the Public Folder Store I get an error. "~The operation failed due to an uspecified internal error. Try restrating the Exchange Information services and try again~" I know this is due to no M: drive bing found, but how do I get the Virtual drive to mount when there is no (default) Mailbox store. I have tried to delete the (default) Mailbox Store, but t when I reboot the E2K box it just reappears. What can I do to mount a mail store on this system? - John Q _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Odd SMTP failure
Environment is Exchange 5.5sp4 We have a distribution list that also has an SMTP address. I send a message from outside the network to the SMTP address it reaches all recipients. If I connect directly to our bridgehead server and send a message to the SMTP address, it reaches all recipients. If I try to send a message from an Outlook client to the SMTP address, it fails with: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 2/28/2003 3:56 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Constellation;l=EX-CNDLR-M01-030228205532Z-23376 MSEXCH:IMS:Constellation:CPS-MD:EX-CNDLR-R01 3501 (000B09AA) 501 5.5.2 Syntax error in address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' But, if I send to the address book entry, it works fine. Any ideas? Chris Bingel Associate - Networks and Infrastructure Constellation Energy Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing Mailbox Store
I have a situation where I have two E2K systems, front-end, back-end. The (default) mailbox store was placed on a remote NAS, that is now gone. There was only one mailbox on it, that was used only for testing. Now I need to add users to this E2K system. But the Exchnage Mailbox Store/Public Store do not mount, and there is no M drive. So I get all types of errors about W3SVC not logging and services failing because there is no Virtual M: drive. I really dont need the old mailbox and store, but I do need to add some mailboxes to this server. The issue being when I create a new mailstore and try to mount it or the Public Folder Store I get an error. "~The operation failed due to an uspecified internal error. Try restrating the Exchange Information services and try again~" I know this is due to no M: drive bing found, but how do I get the Virtual drive to mount when there is no (default) Mailbox store. I have tried to delete the (default) Mailbox Store, but t when I reboot the E2K box it just reappears. What can I do to mount a mail store on this system? - John Q _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Option to send OoO to the internet
Ben, It is "not enabled" (check box---unchecked) by default for all groups. If OOO is enabled globally,it over-rides all other parameters and is effective for all. Thanks Raj -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Option to send OoO to the internet You might try turning it on for everybody, then disabling it for the groups you don't want to have it using distribution groups. Just a thought. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) > > Hi guys, > I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet > for certain Distribution groups in our org. ( not my choice, > directive from the directors). > I do not want to enable this for everyone so I am not checking the " > Allow out of office responses" in Global Settings. > > But it does not seem to be working if you just enable OOO > using exchange Advanced tab for distribution groups. If I > turn on the global setting, it works for everyone, but that > is not desirable. > > Any comments or ideas? > > Thanks > > Raj > > ** > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains > information that is confidential, may be protected by the > attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may > constitute non-public information. This message is intended > to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you > are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read > it; please immediately notify the sender that you have > received this message in error and delete this > message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, > distribution, reproduction of this message or the information > contained in this message or the taking of any action in > reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. > Thank you for your cooperation. > ** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Option to send OoO to the internet
You might try turning it on for everybody, then disabling it for the groups you don't want to have it using distribution groups. Just a thought. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) > > Hi guys, > I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet > for certain Distribution groups in our org. ( not my choice, > directive from the directors). > I do not want to enable this for everyone so I am not checking the " > Allow out of office responses" in Global Settings. > > But it does not seem to be working if you just enable OOO > using exchange Advanced tab for distribution groups. If I > turn on the global setting, it works for everyone, but that > is not desirable. > > Any comments or ideas? > > Thanks > > Raj > > ** > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains > information that is confidential, may be protected by the > attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may > constitute non-public information. This message is intended > to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you > are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read > it; please immediately notify the sender that you have > received this message in error and delete this > message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, > distribution, reproduction of this message or the information > contained in this message or the taking of any action in > reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. > Thank you for your cooperation. > ** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send on behalf of
I'd never noticed before that making someone a delegate puts their name in the Exchange Admin delivery options screen. However, if that's how it gives the delegate send on behalf of rights, then maybe it's subject to the standard Exchange Admin two hour delay. -Peter -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of Here is what I did... What did I do wrong? I have a Help Desk mailbox. I created a distribution list called AIS HELP DESK. I added AIS HELP DESK as a delegate to HELP DESK mailbox. The on behalf shows up on the delivery options tab of the Help Desk mailbox. I think I did everything right, but... It doesn't work.. -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender. When I open the message, it still looks like it came from the sender. When I use send on behalf of, in my inbox, the message looks like it came from the person I have send on behalf of permission. When I open the message it will say something like From: Dennis Depp (on behalf of Terry Depp) Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > Dennis... Please explain your statement. Thanks... > > -Original Message- > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of. > > Dennis > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > > > > You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Good afternoon, > > > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 > > > > I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to > > their folder list. They will need to then reply from that > > mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new > > mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. > > > > When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have > > permissions to send on behalf..." > > > > This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make > > people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much > > security.. What am I missing here? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Mike Mitchell > > Systems email Administrator > > Alverno Information Services > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the per
Option to send OoO to the internet
Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) Hi guys, I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet for certain Distribution groups in our org. ( not my choice, directive from the directors). I do not want to enable this for everyone so I am not checking the " Allow out of office responses" in Global Settings. But it does not seem to be working if you just enable OOO using exchange Advanced tab for distribution groups. If I turn on the global setting, it works for everyone, but that is not desirable. Any comments or ideas? Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wanting to get off Outlook 98
That's what I'd do - get the newest technology that your systems can handle. I assume you already have Exchange 5.5 -- Get Office XP, which comes with OL 2002. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wanting to get off Outlook 98 If you're really three years away from AD then Exchange 5.5+SP4+various patches is the only choice. Exchange 2000 and beyond *require* AD. Outlook XP will still talk to Exchange 5.5. > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Wanting to get off Outlook 98 > > > Good afternoon. > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 > > Yes the time has come and management has decided that they > want to get off > of Outlook 98. > What would be the best Outlook/Exchange to go to now? We are > probably 3 > years away from going > to Active Directory. > > We have windows 2000 available. Please give me wisdom... > > Have a great weekend. > > Mike Mitchell > Systems email Administrator > Alverno Information Services > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wanting to get off Outlook 98
If you're really three years away from AD then Exchange 5.5+SP4+various patches is the only choice. Exchange 2000 and beyond *require* AD. Outlook XP will still talk to Exchange 5.5. > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Wanting to get off Outlook 98 > > > Good afternoon. > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 > > Yes the time has come and management has decided that they > want to get off > of Outlook 98. > What would be the best Outlook/Exchange to go to now? We are > probably 3 > years away from going > to Active Directory. > > We have windows 2000 available. Please give me wisdom... > > Have a great weekend. > > Mike Mitchell > Systems email Administrator > Alverno Information Services > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanting to get off Outlook 98
Good afternoon. Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 Yes the time has come and management has decided that they want to get off of Outlook 98. What would be the best Outlook/Exchange to go to now? We are probably 3 years away from going to Active Directory. We have windows 2000 available. Please give me wisdom... Have a great weekend. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Wise 6.0
http://www.mcpmag.com/Features/article.asp?EditorialsID=329 -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5 server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Wise 6.0
http://www.openone.com/software/Direct-TO-1/index.htm -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5 server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Wise 6.0
http://www.streiff-is.com/GWMigrator/default.htm -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5 server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Wise 6.0
http://www.wingra.com/solutions/groupwisetoexchange.html -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5 server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send on behalf of
Here is what I did... What did I do wrong? I have a Help Desk mailbox. I created a distribution list called AIS HELP DESK. I added AIS HELP DESK as a delegate to HELP DESK mailbox. The on behalf shows up on the delivery options tab of the Help Desk mailbox. I think I did everything right, but... It doesn't work.. -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender. When I open the message, it still looks like it came from the sender. When I use send on behalf of, in my inbox, the message looks like it came from the person I have send on behalf of permission. When I open the message it will say something like From: Dennis Depp (on behalf of Terry Depp) Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > Dennis... Please explain your statement. Thanks... > > -Original Message- > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of. > > Dennis > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > > > > You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Good afternoon, > > > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 > > > > I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to > > their folder list. They will need to then reply from that > > mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new > > mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. > > > > When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have > > permissions to send on behalf..." > > > > This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make > > people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much > > security.. What am I missing here? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Mike Mitchell > > Systems email Administrator > > Alverno Information Services > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send on behalf of
When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender. When I open the message, it still looks like it came from the sender. When I use send on behalf of, in my inbox, the message looks like it came from the person I have send on behalf of permission. When I open the message it will say something like From: Dennis Depp (on behalf of Terry Depp) Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > Dennis... Please explain your statement. Thanks... > > -Original Message- > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of. > > Dennis > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > > > > You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Good afternoon, > > > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 > > > > I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to > > their folder list. They will need to then reply from that > > mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new > > mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. > > > > When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have > > permissions to send on behalf..." > > > > This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make > > people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much > > security.. What am I missing here? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Mike Mitchell > > Systems email Administrator > > Alverno Information Services > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Send on behalf of
The phrasing of the question and terms used based on the question as asked are ambiguous. Delegate permissions is sufficient for 'send on behalf of' rights, if that checkbox is marked. "Send As" permissions are another set of permissions and can only be granted via the Exchange admin. On 2/28/03 11:46, "Nikki Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think that this is true. Delegate permission is sufficient for "send as" rights. (You don't even need to give them any specific permissions, in fact you could give them "none" permissions on all folders, and by virtue of their name being present in the "Delegates" window they will be able to "Send As" that entity.) Nikki -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to their folder list. They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have permissions to send on behalf..." This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much security.. What am I missing here? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send on behalf of
Dennis... Please explain your statement. Thanks... -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of. Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin > > > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Good afternoon, > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 > > I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to > their folder list. They will need to then reply from that > mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new > mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. > > When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have > permissions to send on behalf..." > > This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make > people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much > security.. What am I missing here? > > Thanks. > > Mike Mitchell > Systems email Administrator > Alverno Information Services > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send on behalf of
Martin, How do you do that? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to their folder list. They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have permissions to send on behalf..." This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much security.. What am I missing here? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send on behalf of
I don't think that this is true. Delegate permission is sufficient for "send as" rights. (You don't even need to give them any specific permissions, in fact you could give them "none" permissions on all folders, and by virtue of their name being present in the "Delegates" window they will be able to "Send As" that entity.) Nikki -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to their folder list. They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have permissions to send on behalf..." This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much security.. What am I missing here? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Problems
Outlook populates free/busy data into a shared public folder. Therefore, users won't have any free/busy data until they've logged into their mailboxes using Outlook (or OWA). Search TechNet with the exact wording of the message you're getting, because there are very well may be things you have to do to fix the problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lloyd, D (Dave) Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Problems Hi All, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction... We have begun migrating mailboxes from Ex5.5 to E2K using NetIQ. The organisations are different and mutilple admin groups exist in E2K. We have now moved 10 mailboxes and find that the free/busy is unavailable for all but one (my own as it happens). Ie, if anyone creates a meeting and looks at the schedule, the schedule is unavailable for every included mailbox, except their own and mine. The aim with the admin groups was to have one per region plus a backbone. Looking at Exchange Advanced tab of users I found that my account is in Oceania admin group but almost everyone else is in backbone. It appears the ADC has put most accounts in the Backbone Admin group - not sure why mine was different. All migrated mailboxes are placed on the same server in the Oceanic group so I would have expected them all to be in Oceania group. I've checked the legacyExchangeDN attribute (article 286783) and there's no problem regarding uppercase CN's etc, but the Admin group are generally listed as Backbone. I tried editing this but that broke access to the mailbox. Also, I found another account which IS in the Oceania admin group and that cannot be seen in free/busy either. On the client side, the users get 'cannot update free/busy schedule' when exiting outlook which really explains why there is no data available I guess. The OC Admin group has a Schedule+ public folder on our server, but the backbone Schedule+ is on a server overseas. Don't know if this makes any difference however. What would be nice at least is a method of finding out exactly WHAT Outlook is attempting to write too when it gives that error - ie, what server, which folder or whatever. At least then I could see what is different in my account compared to the others and then search a way to make them the same. BTW we're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2 - both Native mode. Client is WinXP SP1 and OL2002 (10.4219.4219 - SP2. We migrated from Ex 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP5 with clients of NT4 SP5 and OL98. Any help, suggestions etc. Oh, incidentally, created a fresh user and mailbox (ie not migrated) gives the same issue which I'm assuming rules out NetIQ and points to either a server issue (but I can't think what else to check) or client side (but I have someone use my machine to eliminate that). Cheers - Dave Lloyd Assistant IT Systems Team Manager IT Technical Services Rabobank Group Phone: +61 2 9234 4388 Fax: +61 2 9234 4874 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.rabobank.com.au This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments.We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscrib
RE: Send on behalf of
Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of. Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Send on behalf of > > > You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin > > > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Good afternoon, > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 > > I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to > their folder list. They will need to then reply from that > mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new > mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. > > When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have > permissions to send on behalf..." > > This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make > people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much > security.. What am I missing here? > > Thanks. > > Mike Mitchell > Systems email Administrator > Alverno Information Services > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to their folder list. They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have permissions to send on behalf..." This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much security.. What am I missing here? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send on behalf of
Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to their folder list. They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. When these people go to reply, they get "you do not have permissions to send on behalf..." This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much security.. What am I missing here? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory > > > Does anyone know an AD mailing list as good as this one is > for Exchange? > > Thanks. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory
Does anyone know an AD mailing list as good as this one is for Exchange? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failed delivery
We've also had problems with incoming messages from mailing lists generated by Mailman etc. The logs of the sending server show them being delivered to our ES 5.5 server, and message tracking indicates that they have been delivered to the correct mailboxes. They then appear in some mailboxes correctly, but not in others. I've tried using the Exchange Client to search for the message with no result. We've also had situations where a message (either from within or outside our organisation) is sent to multiple outside mailing lists on multiple outside servers. If one of our users is on more than one of these lists then they receive only one copy of the message - it's as if some form of de-duplication is taking place somewhere. By the way, this latter behaviour also seems to occur in other related organisations who are on the same mailing lists. They all use ES (various versions) as far as I am aware. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Watkins V Sent: 27 February 2003 17:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Failed delivery Absolutely nothing!! For the smpt logs. I'll switch message tracking on, Vanessa -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 February 2003 15:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Failed delivery What do SMTP logging and message tracking on the Exchange server indicate? On 2/27/03 9:09, "Watkins V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's a problem because there aren't any being received. Tests from the list server machine indicate a positive helo and response, so no obvious smtp problem!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 February 2003 15:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Failed delivery Perhaps if you posted a sample DNR... On 2/27/03 8:49, "Watkins V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear all, We have a situation where exchange 5.5 users are subscribed to a list as supplied by a unix listmanager. When a message is sent to this list, there are 240 members, there always seem to be a number of failures, which appear to be random. Any ideas why? I have looked for events in the logs after switching on all logging for mta, is, transport etc, but nothing useful. They are not over their mailbox limit, they do not all have inbox rules, so I am baffled. Ex5.5 sp4 plus fixes, NT 4etc thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing an Exchange 2000 server
Nevermind, I found an account that had an "orphaned" mailbox on that server. Pardon the interruption, -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing an Exchange 2000 server I am in the process of removing an Exchange 2000 server from my site. This server was used to during a "swing method" upgrade to temporarily hold users while we upgraded the production servers to 2000. It hasn't had a user's mailbox on it for several weeks and currently only has 3 mailboxes that all appear to be system mailboxes: SMTP, System Attendant, and System Mailbox. No public folders are homed on this server. I am following Q307917 to remove this server and have performed steps 1 through 7 over the past few days to ensure replication has had time to complete each step. When I go to perform the uninstall I get a message to the effect that there are still mailboxes stored on the server and I am unable to perform the uninstall. Is there a way around this or have I missed something? Should I simply remove the server from the site via System Manager and manually uninstall Exchange? Which is the better way? Thanks for any input. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Removing an Exchange 2000 server
I am in the process of removing an Exchange 2000 server from my site. This server was used to during a "swing method" upgrade to temporarily hold users while we upgraded the production servers to 2000. It hasn't had a user's mailbox on it for several weeks and currently only has 3 mailboxes that all appear to be system mailboxes: SMTP, System Attendant, and System Mailbox. No public folders are homed on this server. I am following Q307917 to remove this server and have performed steps 1 through 7 over the past few days to ensure replication has had time to complete each step. When I go to perform the uninstall I get a message to the effect that there are still mailboxes stored on the server and I am unable to perform the uninstall. Is there a way around this or have I missed something? Should I simply remove the server from the site via System Manager and manually uninstall Exchange? Which is the better way? Thanks for any input. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
programm. read the PF Permission Roles ?
Is there any way to read programmatically the permissions set on public folders on EX5.5/NT4 ? Not the client permissions, those set on the Permissions page from exchange administrator. Directory export doesn't seem to have any working field for that info (at least I tried every field offered by headers.exe and didn't get that info). CDO doesn't seem to have relevant fields. Possibly ADSI ? Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA
Install and SSL certificate. Map port 443 on the external firewall interface to the internal IP address of the intranet server. Assign a DNS name to the external IP address if one doesn't already exist for it. Connect to https://dns_name/exchange On 2/28/03 6:14, "Eve Jimah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks. My network is an nt domain but I hope to migrate to windows 2000 soon. I run exchange 5.5 on an NT4 box with OWA installed on our intranet server. This server is a windows 2000 box. To access mailbox via OWA users have to do three things. 1 Open a dial up connection to any ISP 2 run a program called symantec to create a VPN tunnel via the internet 3 connect to the following address Http://server19/exchange. Server19 being our intranet server hosting OWA. What we now want to achieve is to eliminate the second step and make it possible for users to access their mail from any computer without installing symantec vpn. Can anyone help with the steps to achieve this. The setup of my network is as follows Internal network with all the servers including exchange server and intranet server to the left. The Symantec raptor firewall in the middle and the internet to the right. Thanks a million. __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem Accessing OMA in Exchange 2003 Beta 2
Hi, I don't know if anyone else is getting this issue, but any pointers to a resolution would be gratefully received. Environment: Single Windows 2003 RC2 Server Exchange 2003 Beta 2 Sony Ericsson T68i Mobile phone IE6 SP1 OWA works fine, and I can access OMA via IE6 no problem (Although I get the warning about unsupported device...) When I try to access OMA via my phone it prompts for username and password and then just returns an HTTP Status error of 400 Any idea what could be causing the status error to occur, or any thoughts of work arounds? TIA Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Wise 6.0
Good for you. You go, girl! When you post at 10PM Eastern, you may not get a response right away. Give it more than 50 minutes before getting frustrated and repeating your post. Having said that, there are a few resources available at http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp that may help in your migration. Searching for the term 'groupwise' on that site yields several hits, the most prominent of which is http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/migtoolscompare.asp (download links at the top). Most of the links are for GW5.5, though. > -Original Message- > From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Group Wise 6.0 > > > I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an > exchnage 5.5 > server. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA
Hi folks. My network is an nt domain but I hope to migrate to windows 2000 soon. I run exchange 5.5 on an NT4 box with OWA installed on our intranet server. This server is a windows 2000 box. To access mailbox via OWA users have to do three things. 1 Open a dial up connection to any ISP 2 run a program called symantec to create a VPN tunnel via the internet 3 connect to the following address Http://server19/exchange. Server19 being our intranet server hosting OWA. What we now want to achieve is to eliminate the second step and make it possible for users to access their mail from any computer without installing symantec vpn. Can anyone help with the steps to achieve this. The setup of my network is as follows Internal network with all the servers including exchange server and intranet server to the left. The Symantec raptor firewall in the middle and the internet to the right. Thanks a million. __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
