RE: Impromptu Poll
Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Point taken. I should have added, assuming a consistent per user frequency of access and access behaviour. Larger databases still use more hardware in a way... starting with more hard disk surface area. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are On what do you base this assertion? I maintain that corruption is more due to faulty hardware and frequency of access than size of the database. That is, a huge database that is never used has a low probability of corruption. Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Impromptu Poll Does a bigger house take more energy and effort to clean? If you eat at the buffet are you more likely to get backed up and more difficult to restore versus a French restaurant? The chances of corruption exist regardless of database size, but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are. But you also need to consider the backup and restore windows, and quality of hardware. There is someone on this list with a 16GB mailbox. That in itself if corrupted! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Meeting Organizer in Outlook2000
I tried this before. Its ready only. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing Meeting Organizer in Outlook2000 Is it possible to change Meeting Organizer of a scheduled recurring meeting ? To further complicate it, the organizer mailbox has been deleted. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated, Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Not available while GC is down
I am new to Exchange 2000 and need some help. Our environment is a Windows 2000 Domain with Exchange 2000 I have set up a second DC and also enabled it role as a second GC I tested to see if the first DC/GC is down (powered down for 10 minutes)the second one would take over and it did not. I have searched technet and other forums with out much luck. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Brian McDonald _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unable to display the folder...
Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
Make that E55SP4... Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to display the folder... Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
To force you to restart the services whenever you change something... :-) PS: that means that if you can't wait 2 hours, restarting exchange services will sync the DS and IS, setting the permissions. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 01, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
The feature was built in to reduce the number of DS calls made by the IS. Keep in mind that the Exchange 5.x core really came of age (so to speak) in early Pentium hardware - having a P60 as a mail server wasn't uncommon. Adding the cache reduced the number of queries and therefore the load caused by directory access by the stores. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down
Yes I did re-boot the Exchange server and the GC after confirming in the event log's that it had successfuly been been promoted to a GC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down
Did you also check to see if it was showing up in ESM under the Directory Access tab in the server properties? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down Yes I did re-boot the Exchange server and the GC after confirming in the event log's that it had successfuly been been promoted to a GC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
Should have thought to Stop/Start the services... Thanks for being kind to a dunce. Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... To force you to restart the services whenever you change something... :-) PS: that means that if you can't wait 2 hours, restarting exchange services will sync the DS and IS, setting the permissions. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 01, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down
It shows up as a DC not a GC there is also no option to modify. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down
I did find in DA where you could select the GC. I have added the new GC and I will test after hours. Thanks for the help. Brian McDonald _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down
I am not positive, but I think it takes 5 minutes for exchange to find another GC? I thought I read that somewhere? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down I did find in DA where you could select the GC. I have added the new GC and I will test after hours. Thanks for the help. Brian McDonald _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA config (revisited)
Or when RPC connectivity does not exist. But in either case (and Ed will agree here) changing the ASP scripts which run Exchange are unlikely to resolve the issues without some spectacular hacking. On 3/31/03 21:23, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is not my experience. The problem with different sites isn't so much the sites, but when these other sites have different user domains and proper trusts don't exist. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakravarty, Sakti Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA config (revisited) Hi all, I know this has been discussed before on this list but please bear with me ... From my experience, the whitepapers and articles I have read, and the input from people on this list, I have the understanding that when you set up OWA for an Exchange 5.5 only organisation that has multiple sites and servers, you need to only specify one Exchange Server that OWA connects to, and users whose accounts are not held on that server are automatically redirected to their home server for access to their mailbox. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exchange/content /whitepapers/owa_tshoot.asp (under the Additional Information heading) However ... I have a colleague that believes that either: 1. the ASP code in OWA needs to be changed OR 2. users need to enter their Exchange Server name when multiple servers and sites exist, and that redirection to the user's home server is not automatic. Can anyone confirm for me please? Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to display the folder...
I didn't see anyone mention that this interval is configurable and covered in the FAQ. But both are true. On 4/1/03 9:42, Smith Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should have thought to Stop/Start the services... Thanks for being kind to a dunce. Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... To force you to restart the services whenever you change something... :-) PS: that means that if you can't wait 2 hours, restarting exchange services will sync the DS and IS, setting the permissions. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 01, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Not available while GC is down
That is what I had read also. But if that is the only down side I will have to live with it. Thanks again _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Impromptu Poll
Even so, the root cause is usually faulty hardware, not the size of the database per se. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Point taken. I should have added, assuming a consistent per user frequency of access and access behaviour. Larger databases still use more hardware in a way... starting with more hard disk surface area. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are On what do you base this assertion? I maintain that corruption is more due to faulty hardware and frequency of access than size of the database. That is, a huge database that is never used has a low probability of corruption. Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Impromptu Poll Does a bigger house take more energy and effort to clean? If you eat at the buffet are you more likely to get backed up and more difficult to restore versus a French restaurant? The chances of corruption exist regardless of database size, but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are. But you also need to consider the backup and restore windows, and quality of hardware. There is someone on this list with a 16GB mailbox. That in itself if corrupted! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA config (revisited)
I agree. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA config (revisited) Or when RPC connectivity does not exist. But in either case (and Ed will agree here) changing the ASP scripts which run Exchange are unlikely to resolve the issues without some spectacular hacking. On 3/31/03 21:23, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is not my experience. The problem with different sites isn't so much the sites, but when these other sites have different user domains and proper trusts don't exist. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakravarty, Sakti Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA config (revisited) Hi all, I know this has been discussed before on this list but please bear with me ... From my experience, the whitepapers and articles I have read, and the input from people on this list, I have the understanding that when you set up OWA for an Exchange 5.5 only organisation that has multiple sites and servers, you need to only specify one Exchange Server that OWA connects to, and users whose accounts are not held on that server are automatically redirected to their home server for access to their mailbox. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exchange/conte nt /whitepapers/owa_tshoot.asp (under the Additional Information heading) However ... I have a colleague that believes that either: 1. the ASP code in OWA needs to be changed OR 2. users need to enter their Exchange Server name when multiple servers and sites exist, and that redirection to the user's home server is not automatic. Can anyone confirm for me please? Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
And it should be reconfigurable. Two hours makes Exchange 5.5 unmanageable. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unable to display the folder... I didn't see anyone mention that this interval is configurable and covered in the FAQ. But both are true. On 4/1/03 9:42, Smith Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should have thought to Stop/Start the services... Thanks for being kind to a dunce. Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... To force you to restart the services whenever you change something... :-) PS: that means that if you can't wait 2 hours, restarting exchange services will sync the DS and IS, setting the permissions. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 01, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
Re: Impromptu Poll
Yes, that is mostly true. :o) - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:11 AM Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll Even so, the root cause is usually faulty hardware, not the size of the database per se. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Point taken. I should have added, assuming a consistent per user frequency of access and access behaviour. Larger databases still use more hardware in a way... starting with more hard disk surface area. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are On what do you base this assertion? I maintain that corruption is more due to faulty hardware and frequency of access than size of the database. That is, a huge database that is never used has a low probability of corruption. Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clustering OWA but not IM ?
Hi, I currently administer, out of other hosts, a combined front end OWA and IM server. I am interested in Network Load Balancing this server however I am under the impression IM is not supported under the Network Load Balancing architecture. Is that true? I cannot find it specifically about IM in NLB white papers however I have found it in the Exchange 2k Cluster white paper. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering OWA but not IM ?
I can't answer your question about load-balancing IM because I would have to research it and you can do that yourself. However, you can point IM to the non-load-balanced port address of the server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L. Vesneski Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering OWA but not IM ? Hi, I currently administer, out of other hosts, a combined front end OWA and IM server. I am interested in Network Load Balancing this server however I am under the impression IM is not supported under the Network Load Balancing architecture. Is that true? I cannot find it specifically about IM in NLB white papers however I have found it in the Exchange 2k Cluster white paper. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
backups in SAN slow - OT
we have a Dell SAN with 5 NT 4.0 servers and 6 disk arrays. We are using arcserve 6.61 EE build 885sp1...I know that is a bad choice but it was free. It had been backing up everything fine and ususally pretty fast but lately a backup that used to take 30 minutes is taking 4-5 hours. Throughput is extremely low...like 20mbs when it used to be at around 240-320mbs. There are 2 fibre switches and a bride...none of which report any failures or excessive errors. We are going to be moving to Veritas backup exec 9.0 in the next couple weeks. I was more or less looking for what other SAN owners do for troubleshooting or what software there is to monitor/examine the SAN. These servers have been running fine and I did a reboot of the SAN the other weekend to see if that would help...but it has not. thanks for the help -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering OWA but not IM ? I can't answer your question about load-balancing IM because I would have to research it and you can do that yourself. However, you can point IM to the non-load-balanced port address of the server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L. Vesneski Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering OWA but not IM ? Hi, I currently administer, out of other hosts, a combined front end OWA and IM server. I am interested in Network Load Balancing this server however I am under the impression IM is not supported under the Network Load Balancing architecture. Is that true? I cannot find it specifically about IM in NLB white papers however I have found it in the Exchange 2k Cluster white paper. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backups in SAN slow - OT
Do you have the Dell 650/660 or the new EMC 4700? With the older dell SANs and arcserv the data would go over the network and not use the HBA cards. The only way to use the HBA and go right from disk to the tape drive is use the server less backup option and that is not supported on the old dell SAN. If you need some more help ping me back. Ryan -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: backups in SAN slow - OT we have a Dell SAN with 5 NT 4.0 servers and 6 disk arrays. We are using arcserve 6.61 EE build 885sp1...I know that is a bad choice but it was free. It had been backing up everything fine and ususally pretty fast but lately a backup that used to take 30 minutes is taking 4-5 hours. Throughput is extremely low...like 20mbs when it used to be at around 240-320mbs. There are 2 fibre switches and a bride...none of which report any failures or excessive errors. We are going to be moving to Veritas backup exec 9.0 in the next couple weeks. I was more or less looking for what other SAN owners do for troubleshooting or what software there is to monitor/examine the SAN. These servers have been running fine and I did a reboot of the SAN the other weekend to see if that would help...but it has not. thanks for the help -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering OWA but not IM ? I can't answer your question about load-balancing IM because I would have to research it and you can do that yourself. However, you can point IM to the non-load-balanced port address of the server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L. Vesneski Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering OWA but not IM ? Hi, I currently administer, out of other hosts, a combined front end OWA and IM server. I am interested in Network Load Balancing this server however I am under the impression IM is not supported under the Network Load Balancing architecture. Is that true? I cannot find it specifically about IM in NLB white papers however I have found it in the Exchange 2k Cluster white paper. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 Servers 1 OWA
Yes. You need to either deploy a FE server or expose both servers to the internet. On 4/1/03 15:58, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 2 Exchange Servers, Only 1 is available to the internet for OWA, when I browse to it and enter user credentials that is on the second server I get a The page cannot be found error. Users on the Exposed Server get to their mailboxes fine. Am I Missing something in a config somewhere? Both Servers are Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feedback - Migrating Versus Database Copy
I would like to ask you all for some feedback on an issue, but first some background info: My company has an Exchange 5.5 server with a 70GB+ information store. The server is 3+ years old and has reached its end of life. Furthermore, we are out of disk space to defrag the IS because policies were never put in place for file attachment sizes. There was a plan to migrate to Windows 2000 and bring the Exchange server over to Exchange 2000 and also onto newer hardware. Because it has been hard to get people together for the Windows 2000 migration, an alternate plan has been devised to copy the Exchange database over to a new Windows NT/ Exchange 5.5 server, defrag the database and put policies in place to buy time until the Windows 2000 migration can take place. A few of us, although we see the logic in the alternate plan, our gut feeling tells us to do the Windows 2000/ Exchange 2000 migration ourselves rather than wait for the people who never have time. Thoughts. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Feedback - Migrating Versus Database Copy
You can defrag the database without moving it by mapping a drive and specifying the temp file switch in the command lime. Before you bother doing so, however, be sure you're going to reclaim enough free space to make it worth your while. The Application event log will tell you how much white space you have at the end of each periodic store maintenance interval. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Coleman Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Feedback - Migrating Versus Database Copy I would like to ask you all for some feedback on an issue, but first some background info: My company has an Exchange 5.5 server with a 70GB+ information store. The server is 3+ years old and has reached its end of life. Furthermore, we are out of disk space to defrag the IS because policies were never put in place for file attachment sizes. There was a plan to migrate to Windows 2000 and bring the Exchange server over to Exchange 2000 and also onto newer hardware. Because it has been hard to get people together for the Windows 2000 migration, an alternate plan has been devised to copy the Exchange database over to a new Windows NT/ Exchange 5.5 server, defrag the database and put policies in place to buy time until the Windows 2000 migration can take place. A few of us, although we see the logic in the alternate plan, our gut feeling tells us to do the Windows 2000/ Exchange 2000 migration ourselves rather than wait for the people who never have time. Thoughts. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Feedback - Migrating Versus Database Copy
Well, I certainly wouldn't be installing Exchange 5.5 onto an NT 4.0 server ever again if I could help it. Active directory is a complex beast for larger organizations, but it needs to be implemented if Windows is going to remain your primary authentication method and maintaining supportability is an important factor for your company. However, since E2K3 has now gone RTM and it sounds like you have not actually put any AD servers into production, I'd be looking at implementing that instead of W2K based on extended 'planning phases' your company chooses to pursue. That being said, AD is also extremely important (EXTREMELY... Did I mention EXTREMELY) important to a well functioning implementation of E2K. If your AD implementation sucks ass, your Exchange implementation will never be right until that is fixed. Without knowing enough about your environment, it is difficult to recommend that any group undertake this process without some level of political support... Or some highly qualified consultants to do things right (and still take the blame while looking chagrined all the way to the bank). On 4/1/03 19:13, Jason Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to ask you all for some feedback on an issue, but first some background info: My company has an Exchange 5.5 server with a 70GB+ information store. The server is 3+ years old and has reached its end of life. Furthermore, we are out of disk space to defrag the IS because policies were never put in place for file attachment sizes. There was a plan to migrate to Windows 2000 and bring the Exchange server over to Exchange 2000 and also onto newer hardware. Because it has been hard to get people together for the Windows 2000 migration, an alternate plan has been devised to copy the Exchange database over to a new Windows NT/ Exchange 5.5 server, defrag the database and put policies in place to buy time until the Windows 2000 migration can take place. A few of us, although we see the logic in the alternate plan, our gut feeling tells us to do the Windows 2000/ Exchange 2000 migration ourselves rather than wait for the people who never have time. Thoughts. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 Servers 1 OWA
That's because routing to the other server is done via the internal IP address (which you obviously can't get to on the internet.) If you only want to expose one server but enable OWA access to multiple servers you need to use a front end server... Failing that you need to assign another external IP address and just open the relevant port(s) to enable access directly HTH Jason -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April 2003 22:58 To: Exchange Discussions I have 2 Exchange Servers, Only 1 is available to the internet for OWA, when I browse to it and enter user credentials that is on the second server I get a The page cannot be found error. Users on the Exposed Server get to their mailboxes fine. Am I Missing something in a config somewhere? Both Servers are Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Joshua Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Main: (864) 272-1145 Mobile: (864) 449-9912 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed! RE: Norton Antivirus for Exchange problems
Thank you everyone who helped my on this one. It was a hidden mailbox problem. Yeah, someone probably tried to help me out by hiding it and didn't realize they messed it up. It would be nice if my so called tech support could have helped me figure this one out 4 months ago when I first reported the problem. IT1(SW) Biesecker, USN USS DEYO (DD-989) Strike Destroyer System Administrator/Network Analyst Serving with Pride -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus for Exchange problems Is your NAV mailbox hidden ? (NAV for Microsoft Excahnge - $Name it will be called). That happened to me the last time I had to restart the server. I can't recall whether I had the exact same events, but it's something to check out. Maybe someone was being helpful and hid the mailbox for you? Jim Helfer WTW Architects Biesecker, Noel E. IT1(SW) wrote: Hello All. I've been having problems with my NAV for Exchange for several months now. I can't figure out the problem, partly because I guess I'm not sure how it's supposed to work normally. I came in to work after taking 2 weeks off and this is what it was doing. I don't know if one of the other administrators changed something or not. My NAV for Microsoft Exchange service won't stay running. When I start the service, it starts and will run for a few minutes. During that time, I can use the Web Based Administration to look at settings and such, but after a couple minutes, the Web Interface starts saying the page cannot be displayed. Looking at the service, it shows the service stopped. Then looking at the Event Viewer, here are the errors I get, in the order I get them: [Event ID 107] - Service started: Version 2.17 (Build 75) [Event ID 169] - Email Notifications could not be initialized using the MAPI profile Norton AntiVirus for Microsoft Exchange. It failed with 0x80070005. Notifications will not be sent. [Event ID 79] - Service cannot start since the NT account specified is not an Exchange Administrator. Check the account used in 'Services' Control Panel applet and verify that the account has Administrator rights. [Event ID 185] - The service will be shutdown due to an unexpected failure initializing virus protection. [Event ID 169] - Email Notifications could not be initialized using the MAPI profile Norton AntiVirus for Microsoft Exchange. It failed with 0x80040111. Notifications will not be sent. I actually get Event ID 169 several times. Now, I've tried several things to fix this. I've ensured the Service starts up using the ExAdmin account and made sure the password was correct and that didn't help. I changed the password and that didn't help. I tried using my account for starting the service and made sure I was an Exchange Administrator and that didn't work. I get the same errors every time. Has anyone ever seen this or know what I may be missing? Thanks. IT1(SW) Biesecker, USN USS DEYO (DD-989) Strike Destroyer System Administrator/Network Analyst Serving with Pride _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DSAccess doesn't see all my DC's
Exchange 2000 SP3. The Directory Access tab in the server properties of all my Exchange boxes only shows one DC (I have two). Is there a way I can force it to refresh the DC list, *without* manually adding the other DC? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Feedback - Migrating Versus Database Copy
-Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] However, since E2K3 has now gone RTM Ummm, you mean Win2K3 right? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GAL Synchronization between organizations
We want to automate GAL synchronization between separate Exchange organisations: - OrgA (Exchange 5.5, NT4 domain) - OrgB (Exchange 2000, W2K mixed-mode domain). We are not allowed to set up a trust between the domains, but there is IP connectivity. If we want to use the ADC and set up CAs to update GALs, do we need a trust between the domains? I am under the impression that the authentication methods as set up in the Connections tab of the CA negate the need for a trust between domains, but MS articles seem to say otherwise. If we cannot do this, is there another way? The InterOrg Synchronization Tool seems not to require a trust, but does not seem to be supported for Exchange 2000? Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
