RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
Also remember that it sends a notification to each recipient only once until it is turned off and back on again. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Does it not work period, or does it just not work when receiving mail from the Internet? Exchange 2000 (and 5.5) have a feature that allows you to turn off Out of Office responses to the Internet. Exchange 2000 has this turned off by default. If OOF is working inside the office, but not outside, this would be the problem. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:54 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Out of Office Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Subject: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 I have an issue with one user in that they set Out Of Office, but it doesn't work. Although it informs them that it is on, if a mail is sent to them no OOO is received in reply. Server: 1 Exchange 2000 Sp3 Mailbox limit set to 280Mb Client NT4 SP6 Outlook 98 (8.5.6614.0) Mailbox size 86Mb We use roaming profiles, we have set his profile from scratch just in case, although it is a server side function. I would be grateful for any advice that may point me in the right direction. David Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England Company No. 291646 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000
Sure we do, but sometimes it's nice to have some info on setting up the lab. :-) Mike - just run the ExDeploy utility supplied on the E2k3 CD - it covers step-by-step several scenarios of installation, including deploying an additional E2k3 server. Neil -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 27 June 2003 05:42 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000 I was hoping to set it up and move a couple mailboxes over to it to start playing with it. Uh huh... Yeah. We ordinarily call that a lab. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000 Is there a howto or white paper on setting up an Exchange 2003 as a second server to an Exchange 2000 server? I was hoping to set it up and move a couple mailboxes over to it to start playing with it. Any gotchas or look out fors that I should know about? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not Open Relay, but...
Oh well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... boggle You tested someone else's domain at abuse.net without permission? You do realize that if it would have failed other tests, they get put on RBL's? Not a move I would have made. Yikes. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:19 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Not Open Relay, but... Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... I tested it using abuse.net's relay test. It looks like your good for not being an open relay. So my opinion is that you just have a spammer who's trying to mine for address in your company. From what I understand, there's a new program going around the spammer world, that bruteforce guesses e-mail address and collects the NDR's from that domain to determine what's legit and what isn't. My advise would be for you to trace back the IP address he's using and put it in your host.deny file. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
For an interesting article on time standards (or non-standards as they seem to be) have a look at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,985020,00.html Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 22:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? I thought they were in UTC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? IIS Log times are in GMT -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Outgoing mail has been virus scanned Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 10/06/03 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
Only tested Internally, I don't like allowing Out of Office responses to the Internet ;-) Regards David -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 June 2003 16:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Does it not work period, or does it just not work when receiving mail from the Internet? Exchange 2000 (and 5.5) have a feature that allows you to turn off Out of Office responses to the Internet. Exchange 2000 has this turned off by default. If OOF is working inside the office, but not outside, this would be the problem. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:54 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Out of Office Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Subject: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 I have an issue with one user in that they set Out Of Office, but it doesn't work. Although it informs them that it is on, if a mail is sent to them no OOO is received in reply. Server: 1 Exchange 2000 Sp3 Mailbox limit set to 280Mb Client NT4 SP6 Outlook 98 (8.5.6614.0) Mailbox size 86Mb We use roaming profiles, we have set his profile from scratch just in case, although it is a server side function. I would be grateful for any advice that may point me in the right direction. David Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England Company No. 291646 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
Isn't allowing Out of Office replies to the Internet a great thing :-) -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion Sent: 27 June 2003 10:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Only tested Internally, I don't like allowing Out of Office responses to the Internet ;-) Regards David -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 June 2003 16:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Does it not work period, or does it just not work when receiving mail from the Internet? Exchange 2000 (and 5.5) have a feature that allows you to turn off Out of Office responses to the Internet. Exchange 2000 has this turned off by default. If OOF is working inside the office, but not outside, this would be the problem. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:54 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Out of Office Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Subject: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 I have an issue with one user in that they set Out Of Office, but it doesn't work. Although it informs them that it is on, if a mail is sent to them no OOO is received in reply. Server: 1 Exchange 2000 Sp3 Mailbox limit set to 280Mb Client NT4 SP6 Outlook 98 (8.5.6614.0) Mailbox size 86Mb We use roaming profiles, we have set his profile from scratch just in case, although it is a server side function. I would be grateful for any advice that may point me in the right direction. David Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England Company No. 291646 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
If OOF isn't working at all for this user, it could be that this user's OOF message is corrupt. Try the following: The OOF message is a hidden entry in the user's mailbox. The Out of Office Assistant creates a set of two rules in the Inbox subtree. The first contains a Message Class of IPM.Note.Rules.Oof.Template.MicrosoftMessage with a field, PT_String8=MSFT:TDX OOF Rules. The other rule contains a Message Class of IPM.Note.Rules.OoFTemplate.Microsoft. If one or both of these rules are corrupted or unsynchronized with the OOF-enabled indicator, then it's possible that the Out Of Office notification may no longer work. To resolve this, use the Mdbvue32 utility from the Exchange Server 2000 CD-ROM or the Exchange 2000 Server service pack to delete the two entries for Out of Office. Export the user Rules from Outlook (client and server), then use MDB Viewer to manually remove all Rules from the mailbox. To do this: 1. Find mdbvu32.exe in the \support\utils directory on any of the Exchange Server CDs. 2. Run mdbvu32.exe. 3. Click OK to clear the first window that pops up. 4. Make sure that your profile is selected in the Choose Profile window and click OK. 5. Click on the MDB menu option. 6. Click on the OpenMessageStore option. 7. Make sure that Mailbox- [user's full name] is selected and click on Open 8. Click on the MDB menu option again. 9. Click Open Root Folder. 10. In the Child Folders box - double click on Top of Information Store. 11. In the next Child Folders box - double click on Inbox. 12. Look in the Associated Messages in Fld box. (All of your rules are in this box). 13. Once you find the rule that you want to delete then close the properties for that rule. 14. On the MAPI_FOLDER page make sure that the rule that you want to delete is still highlighted. 15. In the Operations available (select operation, then push Call Function button) text box, push the drop down button to reveal the list of functions. 16. Scroll down the list of functions until you see lpFld - deleteMessages() (ON SELECTED MSGS) and then click on it to select it. 17. Next press the Call Function button. This will delete the rule that you selected. 18. Press the Close button to exit the MAPI_FOLDER window. 19. Press Close again to exit the next window. 20. Press close again to exit the last window. 21. Click on the MDB menu option. 22. Click Store Logoff. (Then click OK and OK again). 23. Click Session and then click on Exit. Microsoft KB articles that address this issue are: Q297281 XADM: Out of Office Message Is Not Sent Q255509 OL2000: (CW) How to Use the Out of Office Assistant Q253138 XADM: Mdbvu32.exe to Delete Delegate Rules in a User's Mailbox Neil -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 27 June 2003 10:38 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Isn't allowing Out of Office replies to the Internet a great thing :-) -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion Sent: 27 June 2003 10:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Only tested Internally, I don't like allowing Out of Office responses to the Internet ;-) Regards David __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
Cheers Neil I'll give it a go. Regards David -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 10:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 If OOF isn't working at all for this user, it could be that this user's OOF message is corrupt. Try the following: The OOF message is a hidden entry in the user's mailbox. The Out of Office Assistant creates a set of two rules in the Inbox subtree. The first contains a Message Class of IPM.Note.Rules.Oof.Template.MicrosoftMessage with a field, PT_String8=MSFT:TDX OOF Rules. The other rule contains a Message Class of IPM.Note.Rules.OoFTemplate.Microsoft. If one or both of these rules are corrupted or unsynchronized with the OOF-enabled indicator, then it's possible that the Out Of Office notification may no longer work. To resolve this, use the Mdbvue32 utility from the Exchange Server 2000 CD-ROM or the Exchange 2000 Server service pack to delete the two entries for Out of Office. Export the user Rules from Outlook (client and server), then use MDB Viewer to manually remove all Rules from the mailbox. To do this: 1. Find mdbvu32.exe in the \support\utils directory on any of the Exchange Server CDs. 2. Run mdbvu32.exe. 3. Click OK to clear the first window that pops up. 4. Make sure that your profile is selected in the Choose Profile window and click OK. 5. Click on the MDB menu option. 6. Click on the OpenMessageStore option. 7. Make sure that Mailbox- [user's full name] is selected and click on Open 8. Click on the MDB menu option again. 9. Click Open Root Folder. 10. In the Child Folders box - double click on Top of Information Store. 11. In the next Child Folders box - double click on Inbox. 12. Look in the Associated Messages in Fld box. (All of your rules are in this box). 13. Once you find the rule that you want to delete then close the properties for that rule. 14. On the MAPI_FOLDER page make sure that the rule that you want to delete is still highlighted. 15. In the Operations available (select operation, then push Call Function button) text box, push the drop down button to reveal the list of functions. 16. Scroll down the list of functions until you see lpFld - deleteMessages() (ON SELECTED MSGS) and then click on it to select it. 17. Next press the Call Function button. This will delete the rule that you selected. 18. Press the Close button to exit the MAPI_FOLDER window. 19. Press Close again to exit the next window. 20. Press close again to exit the last window. 21. Click on the MDB menu option. 22. Click Store Logoff. (Then click OK and OK again). 23. Click Session and then click on Exit. Microsoft KB articles that address this issue are: Q297281 XADM: Out of Office Message Is Not Sent Q255509 OL2000: (CW) How to Use the Out of Office Assistant Q253138 XADM: Mdbvu32.exe to Delete Delegate Rules in a User's Mailbox Neil -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 27 June 2003 10:38 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Isn't allowing Out of Office replies to the Internet a great thing :-) -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion Sent: 27 June 2003 10:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000 Only tested Internally, I don't like allowing Out of Office responses to the Internet ;-) Regards David __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England Company No. 291646 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Friday
New server install, Hard drive failure within days. Wait for engineer. Tim -- Tim Gowen RAF Museum IT Dept. Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should take steps to confirm that they are actually virus free. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Veritas OR Microsoft Echange Restore
If you are using Veritas as a backup system and you ant to restore Exchange5.5,which procedure would you follow Microsoft restore or Veritas restore? I am getting readt to restore exchange and i was looking at Veritas way of doing it, and also Microsoft way, and i figured since i am using Veritas, i might as well do it theirway _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black List Recommendation
We use Spamcop's BL, and have had very good success with it - although we're calling it from Sendmail directly on our external relays. One of the biggest advantages is that they post *exactly* why a mail server is listed, and they give specific steps to get unlisted. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Greg Marr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Black List Recommendation Hi Am currently evaluating GFIs MailEssentials anti-spam product and would like to try the Black List functionality.? Does anyone have a recommendation for a good black list??? ? Thanks in advance Greg ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black List Recommendation
I think Spamcop is a little to aggressive for some. Then again, if you want to block spam, go for it. -Original Message- From: Ludwig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions We use Spamcop as primary and NJABL as secondary. The most agile and accurate is Spamcop and you can expect to get rid of 90+% of Spam using that list. /Luis On 27 Jun 2003 at 12:03, Greg Marr wrote: Hi Am currently evaluating GFIs MailEssentials anti-spam product and would like to try the Black List functionality. Does anyone have a recommendation for a good black list??? Thanks in advance Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Veritas OR Microsoft Echange Restore
What are the differences? - Original Message - From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:13 AM Subject: Veritas OR Microsoft Echange Restore If you are using Veritas as a backup system and you ant to restore Exchange5.5,which procedure would you follow Microsoft restore or Veritas restore? I am getting readt to restore exchange and i was looking at Veritas way of doing it, and also Microsoft way, and i figured since i am using Veritas, i might as well do it theirway _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTML Message hangs outlook
On several machine in my organisation, attempting to open a message from one particular supplier causes Outlook to hang - I can open it in Outlook XP on my machine, but even previewing it in Outlook 2000 on at least three other machines causes a Not responding message in task manager. This even happens when showing the message in the Preview pane. The machines in question are running Win98SE and Outlook 2000 SR1, and the server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6a. If I save the message as a html file, the machines can open it in Internet Explorer. Saving the message as an HTML file and opening it in a text editor shows that it was generated by MS Word 9 - the HTML header is shown below: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN HTML xmlns=http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40; xmlns:v = urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml xmlns:o = urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office xmlns:w = urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:wordHEADTITLELizards/TITLE META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 META content=Word.Document name=ProgId META content=MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800 name=GENERATOR META content=Microsoft Word 9 name=OriginatorLINK href=cid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] rel=File-ListLINK href=cid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] rel=Edit-Time-Data!--[if !mso] Any ideas why Outlook can't handle it? Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium --- Outgoing mail has been virus scanned Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 10/06/03 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
WD Click of Death Christmas Day in Nighty Eight I survived, barely I Feel your pain Exchange Server 5.0 Nightmare it was then Michael Harmer -Original Message- From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions New server install, Hard drive failure within days. Wait for engineer. Tim -- Tim Gowen RAF Museum IT Dept. Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should take steps to confirm that they are actually virus free. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating strategy
Good morning all! I'm asking around in the group for different methods of what would be the safe choice to migrating 5.5 to E2K(not at once, we're looking at a period of six-months before retire 5.5). This is kind of what I have in my environment: One NT4.0 domain with a single site of Exch5.5 - roughly 1700 mailboxes One Active Directory - Single domain -2DCs There is a full trust between the two right now, we're planing to use ADMT for this process. Any thoughts or input will be grateful. Thanks!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Removing NNTP entries
Hi. We have a box running XChange 5.5 Sp4 on NT Server 4 Sp6a. A long time ago we served NNTP from this box, but since it was used very little, and since it requires a hefty amount of disk, we got rid of it. However, the news entries remain in the main site, hidden, but they still slow down alot of thing, such as IMAP. Im wondering, is there any way to remove these? I've tried just about everything I can think of. Regards Johan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black List Recommendation
Find anything good here? Interesting augmentation, if you don't do business with the target country... http://blackholes.us/ -Original Message- From: Greg Marr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:03 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Black List Recommendation Subject: Black List Recommendation Hi Am currently evaluating GFIs MailEssentials anti-spam product and would like to try the Black List functionality. Does anyone have a recommendation for a good black list??? Thanks in advance Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas OR Microsoft Echange Restore
Confusion Reigns here Contemplate the past, reboot Bluescreen vexes me. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas OR Microsoft Echange Restore If you are using Veritas as a backup system and you ant to restore Exchange5.5,which procedure would you follow Microsoft restore or Veritas restore? I am getting readt to restore exchange and i was looking at Veritas way of doing it, and also Microsoft way, and i figured since i am using Veritas, i might as well do it theirway _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
Antigen will do it. I spoke to Trend about this yesterday and they said it is a limitation of the program (whatever that means). I would not look for them add any new features to their E55 versions of Scanmail. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
thanks No I was kind'a hoping they might add it to IMSS Dont know If I can get the $$$ Antigen..will have to see... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP Antigen will do it. I spoke to Trend about this yesterday and they said it is a limitation of the program (whatever that means). I would not look for them add any new features to their E55 versions of Scanmail. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
What version of Trend are you running? All of the versions I know about from Trend allow file blocking based on file extension. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
Antigen, Tumbleweed etc.. Most of the gateway products will do this for you. - Original Message - From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:08 AM Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
IMSS 5.12..true while it will allow attachment blocking. IF say the EXE in questions is zip'd up..NG it passes right thru It does get scanned for vireses...BUT hey...Im a bit of a dictator...NO EXE..etc.. period! in my system so now people have a way of getting around the EXEetc attachment block...just ZIP it up and it's in! bill -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP What version of Trend are you running? All of the versions I know about from Trend allow file blocking based on file extension. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
They all do. But the 3.x versions for Exchange 5.5 will not block an extension if it is in a ZIP file. I have no clue if the E2K versions can. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP What version of Trend are you running? All of the versions I know about from Trend allow file blocking based on file extension. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migrating strategy
Are you willing to change the name of your Domain? From: Pham, Tuan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Migrating strategy Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:46:56 -0500 Good morning all! I'm asking around in the group for different methods of what would be the safe choice to migrating 5.5 to E2K(not at once, we're looking at a period of six-months before retire 5.5). This is kind of what I have in my environment: One NT4.0 domain with a single site of Exch5.5 - roughly 1700 mailboxes One Active Directory - Single domain -2DCs There is a full trust between the two right now, we're planing to use ADMT for this process. Any thoughts or input will be grateful. Thanks!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
I see the light. -- From: Martin Blackstone Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP They all do. But the 3.x versions for Exchange 5.5 will not block an extension if it is in a ZIP file. I have no clue if the E2K versions can. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP What version of Trend are you running? All of the versions I know about from Trend allow file blocking based on file extension. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PF creation script in e2k
I am looking for a way to script pf creation in a native win2k\e2k environment. I was hoping that I could use pfadmin to create public folders, but it does not seem to be able to do it. Could anyone point me in the right direction on how to script pf creation in e2k (examples, links, etc..)? Thanks! Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Oy. Because Email has to be made the *exact* equivalent of paper messages, right? -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public
Re: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Heck, why stop there. Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email! - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I'll suggest that! Maybe something self-executing with a company theme song. Announce your presence with authority! :) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Heck, why stop there. Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email! - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
OT: Server Feedback
All, We're looking at our options for a new exchange server. On the hardware side of things we're leaning towards Dell. We have never used Dell before though, so I was curious if any one has any feedback as far as Dell servers are concerned and how their support is? Thanks in advance for all your responses. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I guess. I advised against it, but as usual the PHB's don't want to hear it. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Oy. Because Email has to be made the *exact* equivalent of paper messages, right? -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Re: OT: Server Feedback
Always go with first tier Servers, Storage and backup devices. If you consider Dell in that catergory then fine. From: Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Server Feedback Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:40:07 -0400 All, We're looking at our options for a new exchange server. On the hardware side of things we're leaning towards Dell. We have never used Dell before though, so I was curious if any one has any feedback as far as Dell servers are concerned and how their support is? Thanks in advance for all your responses. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Feedback
I've used Dell before and really didn't have too many issues. Their support is decent. The only problems were with the remote assist cards with Netware 5. I'd pay for the 4hr response time if it's an important server with any vendor. I'm using Compaq/HP now and they are also fine. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Server Feedback All, We're looking at our options for a new exchange server. On the hardware side of things we're leaning towards Dell. We have never used Dell before though, so I was curious if any one has any feedback as far as Dell servers are concerned and how their support is? Thanks in advance for all your responses. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change Password in Outlook doesn't work across a trust
I have users logging into Outlook to Exchange that is in a different domain. The change password feature does not work. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
You can add a disclaimer/default signature with a lot of the Anti-virus products that are available. I use Trendmicro's IMSS. Other alternative is to add an SMTP event sync. Search the Microsoft KB for the article. Raj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
Yes, thanks. I even know how to read a FAQ and search with google. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
And an electric email commanded taser to shock some sense into him/her Fenton -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I'll suggest that! Maybe something self-executing with a company theme song. Announce your presence with authority! :) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Heck, why stop there. Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email! - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Server Feedback
Ditto this comment. For some reason I have been around Dell servers probably more than any other make for the last 5-6 years. In that time I can tell you I have seen one RAID card and one hard drive (Fujitsu - but sold through Dell) fail. This was not on the same server. Oh, also one DLT changer ate a tape and had to be replaced. Four hour service is nice and reasonably priced. The above DLT changer had this and I had a replacement in hand in about 90 minutes. Not bad. On a slightly different note, do not consider Dell Inspiron laptops for anything other than target practice. In my experience there has been not been a more problematic laptop produced. Sean Winters -Original Message- From: Marlovits, John [JM1] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server Feedback I've used Dell before and really didn't have too many issues. Their support is decent. The only problems were with the remote assist cards with Netware 5. I'd pay for the 4hr response time if it's an important server with any vendor. I'm using Compaq/HP now and they are also fine. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Server Feedback All, We're looking at our options for a new exchange server. On the hardware side of things we're leaning towards Dell. We have never used Dell before though, so I was curious if any one has any feedback as far as Dell servers are concerned and how their support is? Thanks in advance for all your responses. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server. We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit. If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too. I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising clustering because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
I don't see the benefits either. Your two points are spot on. Exchange failures are generally due to poor hardware or poor administration. Mitigate these two issues and you will have a great single-node [1] cluster. [1] Single-Node copyright Ed Crowley. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MSX dude Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering... is it worth it? Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server. We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit. If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too. I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising clustering because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. -Original Message- From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering... is it worth it? Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server. We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit. If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too. I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising clustering because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. -Original Message- From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering... is it worth it? Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server. We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit. If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too. I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising clustering because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not
likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply
patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can
failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the
server without interrupting users or bouncing email.
On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest
using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz
without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs
more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE /
PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to.
You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't
had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN.
2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand
holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising
clustering
because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or
whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªy²'µêßi¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿r嬦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡jx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê!jx .+-iX¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
Havent they recommended Active/Passive for awhile now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schneider, Bryan D
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not
likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply
patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can
failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the
server without interrupting users or bouncing email.
On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest
using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz
without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs
more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE /
PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to.
You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't
had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN.
2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand
holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising
clustering
because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or
whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..+--xm ,) r( \ y' i�� ) l+-rr W{jx Vmyzr vi
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
Definitely Active/Passive.
The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to
tape after.
This is per a TechEd presentation.
William
- Original Message -
From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the
server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where
you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service
packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much
time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or
bouncing email.
On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and
the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one
quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange
2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However,
Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to
failover to.
You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a
heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we
attributed to the SAN.
2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand
holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the
benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the
database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising
clustering
because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or
whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
A major automotive manufacturer did this for a bit, required in the company pronounced sig. It was very silly and amateurish, made employees very embarrassed to send email. The logo was about 200x200 and they used fonts at about 16 pt. I guess they saw the light, I don't see it in their sigs anymore, just normal text now. Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Fenton Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails And an electric email commanded taser to shock some sense into him/her Fenton -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I'll suggest that! Maybe something self-executing with a company theme song. Announce your presence with authority! :) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Heck, why stop there. Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email! - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination,
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
I believe they have always recommended an Active/Active cluster.
Paul Roubicheux sais the E2K3 clusters awesomely.
-Original Message-
From: Schneider, Bryan D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the
server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where
you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service
packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much
time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or
bouncing email.
On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the
rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one
quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange
2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However,
Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to
failover to.
You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat.
We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to
the SAN.
2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more
hand
holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange
server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the
benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the
database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising
clustering
because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any
links or
whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S ^jZ 2G(L\xfyb))
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
Active/Active Clusters however are limited to 1900 mapi connections (Sp2+) so for that
reason and others, Active/Passive is generally recommended.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
I believe they have always recommended an Active/Active cluster.
Paul Roubicheux sais the E2K3 clusters awesomely.
-Original Message-
From: Schneider, Bryan D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not
likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply
patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can
failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the
server without interrupting users or bouncing email.
On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest
using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz
without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs
more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE /
PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to.
You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't
had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN.
2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand
holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising
clustering
because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or
whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S ^jZ 2G(L\xfyb))
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
Definitely Active/Passive.
The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to
tape after.
This is per a TechEd presentation.
William
- Original Message -
From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the
server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where
you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service
packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much
time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or
bouncing email.
On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and
the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one
quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange
2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However,
Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to
failover to.
You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a
heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we
attributed to the SAN.
2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand
holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the
benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the
database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising
clustering
because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or
whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
The PPT would be wrong then as 4+1+2 8 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? Definitely Active/Passive. The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to tape after. This is per a TechEd presentation. William - Original Message - From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or bouncing email. On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to. You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN. 2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
OK, I'll try it another way - the presentation that I heard at Tech-Ed, matched up against my notes, indicated that it was: A) 4 x 4-way servers, active, plus B) 1 x 4-way server, passive, plus C) 2 x 2-way servers, passive, for backups, etc. Equals 7. I never claimed 8. I'm perfectly capable of basic math. 8, to my recollection, notes, and thoughts of the PPT, is wrong., -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 12:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The PPT would be wrong then as 4+1+2 8 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? Definitely Active/Passive. The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to tape after. This is per a TechEd presentation. William - Original Message - From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or bouncing email. On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to. You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN. 2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You are totally right. Cochran's slides do say that. My notes do not. I am wrong. I'm sorry, Gary. 7-node cluster per the slides. 4-1-2. Not 5-1-2. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? OK, I'll try it another way - the presentation that I heard at Tech-Ed, matched up against my notes, indicated that it was: A) 4 x 4-way servers, active, plus B) 1 x 4-way server, passive, plus C) 2 x 2-way servers, passive, for backups, etc. Equals 7. I never claimed 8. I'm perfectly capable of basic math. 8, to my recollection, notes, and thoughts of the PPT, is wrong., -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 12:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The PPT would be wrong then as 4+1+2 8 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? Definitely Active/Passive. The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to tape after. This is per a TechEd presentation. William - Original Message - From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or bouncing email. On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to. You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN. 2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
