RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
Could that be because the proper syntax is: $telnet mail-server-IP 110 +OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2654.50 ready $UserName domain\user\exchangealias As is I believe clearly spelled out in the FAQ? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Tshering NORBU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > Freddie, > > Here is what I get when I telnet remotely: > $telnet mail-server-IP 110 > +OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2654.50 ready > > $UserName > -ERR Protocol Error > > Then same error whatever i type the next. > > > Steve, > My mail server has dial-up access. There is no problem when i > dial-up to it. > But when I (manually) choose to connect with other ISP > dial-up, it does not > work at all. Cannot send , cannot receive any mail. No error. > The outlook > (2000) just stays that way. > > > NORBU > > - Original Message - > From: "Freddie Soerensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:36 PM > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > Norbu (your real name ?) :) > > telnet to the mailserver on port 110 > When it says POP3 server ready stuff, enter > user YourUserName > pass YourPassword > list > > (Needless to say replace YourUserName and YourPasword with your actual > data) > > See how far you get - if it lists a lot you should have no > problem from > outlook unless your pst file is very large (>2GB) or you have > thousands > of mails in your mailbox and activated 'leave messages on the server'. > Then it can hang like this > > Freddie > > > _ > Freddie Soerensen > Conares Metal Supply Limited > Tel : +423 235 5040 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.conares.com > > "Software suppliers are trying to make their software packages more > user-friendly... Their best approach, so far, has been to take all the > old brochures, and stamp the words, 'user-friendly' on the cover.- > Bill Gates. " > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tshering NORBU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 13:08 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Steve, > > OK, am using my name now :) > > The exchange server is not behind a firewall. > > > > Freddie, > > > > From remote, I cannot telnet to mail server without > > specifying ports 25 or 110. > > > > NORBU (The BOYZ) > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Knight, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:57 PM > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > Boyz [do any of you have a real name?] > > > > > > Is the exchange server behind a firewall, preventing > access via the > > > internet? > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 11 July 2003 13:21 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > > > Try to log in to the POP3 server with telnet and list the messages > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:59 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > with port 25, I get: > > > > MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready > > > > > > > > With port 110: > > > > > > > > MS Exchange Server POP3 server **version** ready > > > > > > > > BOYZ > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:35 +0200 > > > > "Freddie Soerensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on port > > > > 25 and 110 > > > > >? > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> -Original Message- > > > > >> From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:33 > > > > >> To: Exchange Discussions > > > > >> > > > > >> There is no error message, the status of 'checking and > > sending > > > > >>messages' goes forever and there is nothing happening. > > > > >> > > > > >> BOYZ > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200 > > > > >> "Freddie Soerensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> >What is the error message(s) you are receiving ? > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> -Original Message- > > > > >> >> From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> >> Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58 > > > > >> >> To: Exchange Discussions > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Hello list, > > > > >> >> On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up > > > > >> > > > > >> connection to > > > > >> >>the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. > > > > >>But when I > > > > >> >>dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending
RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
Sorry, I don't get that ??? Why $UserName when telnetting ? It doesn't work Am I missing something ? > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2003 13:07 > To: Exchange Discussions > > Could that be because the proper syntax is: > > $telnet mail-server-IP 110 > +OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2654.50 ready > > $UserName domain\user\exchangealias > > As is I believe clearly spelled out in the FAQ? > > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tshering NORBU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:30 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > Freddie, > > > > Here is what I get when I telnet remotely: > > $telnet mail-server-IP 110 > > +OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2654.50 ready > > > > $UserName > > -ERR Protocol Error > > > > Then same error whatever i type the next. > > > > > > Steve, > > My mail server has dial-up access. There is no problem when > i dial-up > > to it. > > But when I (manually) choose to connect with other ISP dial-up, it > > does not work at all. Cannot send , cannot receive any > mail. No error. > > The outlook > > (2000) just stays that way. > > > > > > NORBU > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Freddie Soerensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:36 PM > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > Norbu (your real name ?) :) > > > > telnet to the mailserver on port 110 > > When it says POP3 server ready stuff, enter > > user YourUserName > > pass YourPassword > > list > > > > (Needless to say replace YourUserName and YourPasword with > your actual > > data) > > > > See how far you get - if it lists a lot you should have no > > problem from > > outlook unless your pst file is very large (>2GB) or you have > > thousands > > of mails in your mailbox and activated 'leave messages on > the server'. > > Then it can hang like this > > > > Freddie > > > > > > _ > > Freddie Soerensen > > Conares Metal Supply Limited > > Tel : +423 235 5040 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.conares.com > > > > "Software suppliers are trying to make their software packages more > > user-friendly... Their best approach, so far, has been to > take all the > > old brochures, and stamp the words, 'user-friendly' on the > cover.- > > Bill Gates. " > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Tshering NORBU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 13:08 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Steve, > > > OK, am using my name now :) > > > The exchange server is not behind a firewall. > > > > > > Freddie, > > > > > > From remote, I cannot telnet to mail server without > > > specifying ports 25 or 110. > > > > > > NORBU (The BOYZ) > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Knight, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:57 PM > > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > > > > Boyz [do any of you have a real name?] > > > > > > > > Is the exchange server behind a firewall, preventing > > access via the > > > > internet? > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: 11 July 2003 13:21 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > > > > > > Try to log in to the POP3 server with telnet and list > the messages > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:59 > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > > > with port 25, I get: > > > > > MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready > > > > > > > > > > With port 110: > > > > > > > > > > MS Exchange Server POP3 server **version** ready > > > > > > > > > > BOYZ > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:35 +0200 > > > > > "Freddie Soerensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on port > > > > > 25 and 110 > > > > > >? > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -Original Message- > > > > > >> From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:33 > > > > > >> To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > >> > > > > > >> There is no error message, the status of 'checking and > > > sending > > > > > >>messages' goes forever and there is nothing happening. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> BOYZ > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200 > > > > > >> "Freddie Soerensen" <[EMAIL
Re: IMS stops working after Windows 2000 installed on Bridgehead
Assuming you have installed IIS by default as well. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:39 PM Subject: RE: IMS stops working after Windows 2000 installed on Bridgehead > Yep. And the SMTP service is installed by default so unless you manually go > in and do this, you will have problems. > > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS stops working after Windows 2000 installed on Bridgehead > > Make sure the W2K SMTP service is disabled. This will conflict with > your IMC since they both use port 25. > > Jeff > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Earl Mitchell > Posted At: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:44 AM > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > Conversation: IMS stops working after Windows 2000 installed on > Bridgehead > Subject: IMS stops working after Windows 2000 installed on Bridgehead > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 > > We installed Windows 2000 on our Bridge Head Server. > We reinstalled Exchange 5.5. Everything is working > except the Internet Mail Services. > > Do you know if there are different settings for a > windows 2000 setup. We came from NT 4.0 > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
Not $username - $ is the prompt And I forgot, its not username, its user -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 7:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > Sorry, I don't get that ??? > > Why $UserName when telnetting ? It doesn't work > > Am I missing something ? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2003 13:07 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Could that be because the proper syntax is: > > > > $telnet mail-server-IP 110 > > +OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2654.50 ready > > > > $UserName domain\user\exchangealias > > > > As is I believe clearly spelled out in the FAQ? > > > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Tshering NORBU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:30 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > > > Freddie, > > > > > > Here is what I get when I telnet remotely: > > > $telnet mail-server-IP 110 > > > +OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2654.50 ready > > > > > > $UserName > > > -ERR Protocol Error > > > > > > Then same error whatever i type the next. > > > > > > > > > Steve, > > > My mail server has dial-up access. There is no problem when > > i dial-up > > > to it. > > > But when I (manually) choose to connect with other ISP > dial-up, it > > > does not work at all. Cannot send , cannot receive any > > mail. No error. > > > The outlook > > > (2000) just stays that way. > > > > > > > > > NORBU > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Freddie Soerensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:36 PM > > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > > > Norbu (your real name ?) :) > > > > > > telnet to the mailserver on port 110 > > > When it says POP3 server ready stuff, enter > > > user YourUserName > > > pass YourPassword > > > list > > > > > > (Needless to say replace YourUserName and YourPasword with > > your actual > > > data) > > > > > > See how far you get - if it lists a lot you should have no > > > problem from > > > outlook unless your pst file is very large (>2GB) or you have > > > thousands > > > of mails in your mailbox and activated 'leave messages on > > the server'. > > > Then it can hang like this > > > > > > Freddie > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Freddie Soerensen > > > Conares Metal Supply Limited > > > Tel : +423 235 5040 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > www.conares.com > > > > > > "Software suppliers are trying to make their software > packages more > > > user-friendly... Their best approach, so far, has been to > > take all the > > > old brochures, and stamp the words, 'user-friendly' on the > > cover.- > > > Bill Gates. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Tshering NORBU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 13:08 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > Steve, > > > > OK, am using my name now :) > > > > The exchange server is not behind a firewall. > > > > > > > > Freddie, > > > > > > > > From remote, I cannot telnet to mail server without > > > > specifying ports 25 or 110. > > > > > > > > NORBU (The BOYZ) > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Knight, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:57 PM > > > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > > > > > > > Boyz [do any of you have a real name?] > > > > > > > > > > Is the exchange server behind a firewall, preventing > > > access via the > > > > > internet? > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: 11 July 2003 13:21 > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try to log in to the POP3 server with telnet and list > > the messages > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:59 > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > > > > > with port 25, I get: > > > > > > MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready > > > > > > > > > > > > With port 110: > > > > > > > > > > > > MS Exchange Server POP3 server **version** ready > > > > > > > > > > > > BOYZ
RE: Mailbox recovery E2K
After thinking about it, you are right. If the server does go down and you delete and create a new mailbox on another server the profile would have to be changed or recreated. The reason they wanted to do this was to reduce email outages while the DR team recovered the old mail and made it available via a pst by exmerge. Or some other method. From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:48:34 -0400 If the original server is down? I am afraid that the user would have to re-configure Outlook profile manually and then log back in, otherwise Outlook will be trying to contact the downed server and time out. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox recovery E2K I had a question poised to me to which I never thought about or tested. In an E2K/MS2000 domain setup in mixed mode, with muliplte email servers in one group. If one of the servers goes down and all the customer wants to do is restore email flow for those users affected. He would like to know does he just delete the mailbox from the affected users AD account and create new ones on the other email servers? I never tried it? What does the users have to do logout of Outlook? I think deleting mailboxes make new ones and have the users logoff and back may be ok. Thoughts? _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox recovery E2K
We take an approach that may work for you...We have a recovery domain (restore.domain.com) and of course the production domain of domain.com When a mailbox server in domain.com goes down, the following occurs. 1. Diagnose the cause of the failure and repair this cause (for example, replace the hardware at issue). 2. If the OS on the mail server in domain.com is not damaged, then copy TLOGS from production server to recovery server (in restore.domain.com) and then reset the databases on the production mail server... this gives everyone e-mail service... but they won't have their old data and won't have their rules. 3. Now recover the production databases using restore.domain.com and the TLOGS that you copied from the production mail server. 4. Once recovered, copy these dbs back to the production server (but use a different name for the files than the production mail server is using for the dbs).. 5. Dismount the reset dbs on the production server, rename these dbs to something else, rename the recovered dbs (the ones you copied) to the correct names and then remount... your users now have their mail up to the point of your failure and their rules back, but are now missing recent e-mail... 6. Copy the reset dbs back to the restore.domain.com domain and then use exmerge to dump this mail to pst files... then exmerge these pst files back into the production... you users now have all mail restored. The link below gives more detail and the MS references for doing this. http://web.umr.edu/~jedg/Work%20Stuff/Exchange_2000/e2k_disaster_recover y_informatio.htm Hope this helps you :) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K After thinking about it, you are right. If the server does go down and you delete and create a new mailbox on another server the profile would have to be changed or recreated. The reason they wanted to do this was to reduce email outages while the DR team recovered the old mail and made it available via a pst by exmerge. Or some other method. From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:48:34 -0400 If the original server is down? I am afraid that the user would have to re-configure Outlook profile manually and then log back in, otherwise Outlook will be trying to contact the downed server and time out. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox recovery E2K I had a question poised to me to which I never thought about or tested. In an E2K/MS2000 domain setup in mixed mode, with muliplte email servers in one group. If one of the servers goes down and all the customer wants to do is restore email flow for those users affected. He would like to know does he just delete the mailbox from the affected users AD account and create new ones on the other email servers? I never tried it? What does the users have to do logout of Outlook? I think deleting mailboxes make new ones and have the users logoff and back may be ok. Thoughts? _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EM
RE: Mailbox recovery E2K
Yes but he wanted to know if the hardware just plain went out the door. No OS no nothing. He just wanted to use the exsisting email servers still up to take up the slack until th recovery process could take place. It's a long story but that what you get for having someone else maintain your system. Not that they are not good but there is always finger pointing when outsourcing services From: "Edgington, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:12:34 -0500 We take an approach that may work for you...We have a recovery domain (restore.domain.com) and of course the production domain of domain.com When a mailbox server in domain.com goes down, the following occurs. 1. Diagnose the cause of the failure and repair this cause (for example, replace the hardware at issue). 2. If the OS on the mail server in domain.com is not damaged, then copy TLOGS from production server to recovery server (in restore.domain.com) and then reset the databases on the production mail server... this gives everyone e-mail service... but they won't have their old data and won't have their rules. 3. Now recover the production databases using restore.domain.com and the TLOGS that you copied from the production mail server. 4. Once recovered, copy these dbs back to the production server (but use a different name for the files than the production mail server is using for the dbs).. 5. Dismount the reset dbs on the production server, rename these dbs to something else, rename the recovered dbs (the ones you copied) to the correct names and then remount... your users now have their mail up to the point of your failure and their rules back, but are now missing recent e-mail... 6. Copy the reset dbs back to the restore.domain.com domain and then use exmerge to dump this mail to pst files... then exmerge these pst files back into the production... you users now have all mail restored. The link below gives more detail and the MS references for doing this. http://web.umr.edu/~jedg/Work%20Stuff/Exchange_2000/e2k_disaster_recover y_informatio.htm Hope this helps you :) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K After thinking about it, you are right. If the server does go down and you delete and create a new mailbox on another server the profile would have to be changed or recreated. The reason they wanted to do this was to reduce email outages while the DR team recovered the old mail and made it available via a pst by exmerge. Or some other method. From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:48:34 -0400 If the original server is down? I am afraid that the user would have to re-configure Outlook profile manually and then log back in, otherwise Outlook will be trying to contact the downed server and time out. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox recovery E2K I had a question poised to me to which I never thought about or tested. In an E2K/MS2000 domain setup in mixed mode, with muliplte email servers in one group. If one of the servers goes down and all the customer wants to do is restore email flow for those users affected. He would like to know does he just delete the mailbox from the affected users AD account and create new ones on the other email servers? I never tried it? What does the users have to do logout of Outlook? I think deleting mailboxes make new ones and have the users logoff and back may be ok. Thoughts? _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 ___
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail enabled public folder
Some of these things are easier done with mailboxes than PFs. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail enabled public folder Gurus, Ex2K - Native mode I have a mail enabled public folder (calendar) for a meeting room that I can e-mail when booking a meeting to ensure it is booked. This works, however it only tentatively accepts the meeting request. Some questions: - Can (and how, if so) can I get it to auto accept meeting requests? - Can (and how, if so) can I have the meetings it has already booked in show in the "Free/Busy" grid that displays when I select other users? - Can (and how, if so) can I get it to delete the appointment if I send a cancel meeting request? I am happy to be pointed to somewhere the KB - I have spent some time looking there, however MS have done something to their support site and every new page I get up asks me to debug. All help graciously appreciated... themolk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
more info I gleaned from their IT guy: Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of their sending server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com doesn't exist. I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I can send to them from any other account. Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com take over it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, let me take a stab at this... Because of this: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not the domain itself? Example: Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver But If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Can we get the full headers for that NDR? Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very unimformative) I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery delayed report, we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the message. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Seeing as Casey has butchered the NDR's its nearly impossible to tell what's actually happening. However, its not *completely* impossible. penncolor.com *is* delivering the mail, and the reject is coming from their end: > Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com > mail.kpafilms.com[12.155.200.200](misconfigured sender)) Their Exchange (I presume) server (exbdc01.kpafilms.com) is rejecting the mail from their mail relay (mail.kpafilms.com), as is clearly spelled out by this slice of NDR. And, in this case, the fix is the same for Ex 5.5 and for E2k - beat the foreign postmaster about the head and shoulders with a 2x4 until they fix their mail issues. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > For some reason, it would appear that your mail server is delaying the > message, instead of trying the next highest MX record. Having two MX > records, with the first being unavailable, is common practice (at > least in the *nix world), where the higher-level MX is an SMTP > gateway. > > Unfortunately, I can't tell you how to fix this, I'm still on Ex5.5. > > Steven > --- > Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Network Administrator > The Key School, Annapolis Maryland > > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:48 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: misconfigured sender > > > Greetings, > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Server is E2K > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > My company
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
what is TLS? Sorry if this is a stupid question. :) Sam -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox recovery E2K
hrm... guess I didn't get that from the original note. sorry. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K Yes but he wanted to know if the hardware just plain went out the door. No OS no nothing. He just wanted to use the exsisting email servers still up to take up the slack until th recovery process could take place. It's a long story but that what you get for having someone else maintain your system. Not that they are not good but there is always finger pointing when outsourcing services From: "Edgington, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:12:34 -0500 We take an approach that may work for you...We have a recovery domain (restore.domain.com) and of course the production domain of domain.com When a mailbox server in domain.com goes down, the following occurs. 1. Diagnose the cause of the failure and repair this cause (for example, replace the hardware at issue). 2. If the OS on the mail server in domain.com is not damaged, then copy TLOGS from production server to recovery server (in restore.domain.com) and then reset the databases on the production mail server... this gives everyone e-mail service... but they won't have their old data and won't have their rules. 3. Now recover the production databases using restore.domain.com and the TLOGS that you copied from the production mail server. 4. Once recovered, copy these dbs back to the production server (but use a different name for the files than the production mail server is using for the dbs).. 5. Dismount the reset dbs on the production server, rename these dbs to something else, rename the recovered dbs (the ones you copied) to the correct names and then remount... your users now have their mail up to the point of your failure and their rules back, but are now missing recent e-mail... 6. Copy the reset dbs back to the restore.domain.com domain and then use exmerge to dump this mail to pst files... then exmerge these pst files back into the production... you users now have all mail restored. The link below gives more detail and the MS references for doing this. http://web.umr.edu/~jedg/Work%20Stuff/Exchange_2000/e2k_disaster_recover y_informatio.htm Hope this helps you :) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K After thinking about it, you are right. If the server does go down and you delete and create a new mailbox on another server the profile would have to be changed or recreated. The reason they wanted to do this was to reduce email outages while the DR team recovered the old mail and made it available via a pst by exmerge. Or some other method. From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:48:34 -0400 If the original server is down? I am afraid that the user would have to re-configure Outlook profile manually and then log back in, otherwise Outlook will be trying to contact the downed server and time out. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox recovery E2K I had a question poised to me to which I never thought about or tested. In an E2K/MS2000 domain setup in mixed mode, with muliplte email servers in one group. If one of the servers goes down and all the customer wants to do is restore email flow for those users affected. He would like to know does he just delete the mailbox from the affected users AD account and create new ones on the other email servers? I never tried it? What does the users have to do logout of Outlook? I think deleting mailboxes make new ones and have the users logoff and back may be ok. Thoughts? _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe:
On behalf of ...
I have an outlook user who all of a sudden started getting all her mail delivered to her on behalf of the sender. For example, when I send her mail, it shows up in her mailbox and the from field has On Behalf of Todd Boynton and the mail body is empty. This is the only thing left in the body: -Original Message- From: On Behalf Of Nick Houtman Sent: None Subject: UMaine Today 7/16/03 I'm running Exchange 2000 sp3. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slow down (memory leak?) in after applying W2K SP4
I though I would throw this out there - we have experienced problems when applying SP4 for Windows 2000 on our Exchange 2000 server (another identically configured Exchange server was not affected by the SP4 update). After applying the SP, the server seemed to run fine but eventually ran out of memory (because of a suspected memory leak in a lower level component), the system slowed and the IS consumed nearly all CPU cycles. Removing the SP and rebooting the server brought it back to normal operation. This server had NO third party software (including no virus scanners) and was a Compaq DL580 with current drivers. The servers only function was as a mailbox server for 2,500 users. The Exchange service pack level was 3. While PSS has no record of a similar problem in existing SRX's, I have found some evidence that the problem has been experienced by others: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=SP4+Windows+2000+Slow+Exchange&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=d2f53307.030757.43fa3337%40posting.google.com&rnum=1 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=523a01c3418d%2498339f60%24a401280a%40phx.gbl&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DSP4%2BWindows%2B2000%2BSlow%2BExchange%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D523a01c3418d%252498339f60%2524a401280a%2540phx.gbl%26rnum%3D7 http://groups.google.com/groups?q=SP4+Windows+2000+Slow+Exchange+-5.5&start=10&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=028301c34af2%244ad1a460%24a101280a%40phx.gbl&rnum=20 We currently have a support issue open with PSS (SRX030716601823) - feel free to reference this if you open your own case with PSS. If you have any other details please let me know. Thanks, david moore Chevron Phillips Chemical Messaging Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 832-813-4222 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: On behalf of ...
Does have any delegates setup? From: "Boynton, Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: On behalf of ... Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:06:54 -0400 I have an outlook user who all of a sudden started getting all her mail delivered to her on behalf of the sender. For example, when I send her mail, it shows up in her mailbox and the from field has On Behalf of Todd Boynton and the mail body is empty. This is the only thing left in the body: -Original Message- From: On Behalf Of Nick Houtman Sent: None Subject: UMaine Today 7/16/03 I'm running Exchange 2000 sp3. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: On behalf of ...
No she does not. Come to find out, she doesn't use the exchange server at all, so at least I can rule that out. It is an IMAP connection to another server. I'm thinking it's a client issue but I can't pinpoint the problem Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: On behalf of ... Does have any delegates setup? From: "Boynton, Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: On behalf of ... Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:06:54 -0400 I have an outlook user who all of a sudden started getting all her mail delivered to her on behalf of the sender. For example, when I send her mail, it shows up in her mailbox and the from field has On Behalf of Todd Boynton and the mail body is empty. This is the only thing left in the body: -Original Message- From: On Behalf Of Nick Houtman Sent: None Subject: UMaine Today 7/16/03 I'm running Exchange 2000 sp3. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Have a look at MS Q319267 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2003 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet what is TLS? Sorry if this is a stupid question. :) Sam -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing
However you have to make the election up front. So when you buy the CAL you have to determine whether is will be for the device or for a client. For instance I use Outlook on my desktop, on my laptop and on my computer at home. I only need one license to the same mailbox on the Exchange server. You have the opposite of 5 users on one device but they cannot use that license on each of their laptops, if they each had one. Ralph H. Elmerick NT/Exchange Administrator 330-471-3409 -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Licensing that is what I was told as well by my rep. It is now a CAL per "device" that connects. So if a person at one computer opens 5 mailboxes in Outlook it is only 1 CAL. - Original Message - From: "Chinnery, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:31 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing Some time ago (I believe it was last year), I listened to a webcast put on by Microsoft. During the Q & A, one person asked the Microsoft rep what the licensing requirement would be for the following scenario: 5 Mailboxes all being accessed from 1 computer His answer: 1 license because only 1 machine was used. Which just goes to show, as had been said mb people much more experienced with Exchange than me, that it all depends on who you talk to and that you should always direct licensing questions to your Microsoft representative. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing You need to have as many CALs (client access licenses) as you do users who will connect. As far as I know each user must have their own CAL. Terminal Services works the way you're suggesting, but not this. You might not be able to buy a 5.5 CAL anymore... You may have to buy Exchange 2000 CALs (isn't there a Exchange 2003 coming out? In that case buy THOSE CALs), since a CAL is "backwardly compatible." Matt -Original Message- From: Stew Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Licensing Can anyone explain how Exchange 5.5 licensing works. If we need to have 250 users mailboxes do we need 250 licenses? Is is based on concurrent users--for example if a company has 1000 mailboxes but at any point only 50 people are connected to the exchange server do you only need 50 licenses? Its a bit confusing, I am sure many of you will agree. We definitely want to make sure we do this the right way. Many thanks. Stew __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admi
SMTP Address Lists
To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the SMTP addresses out of our Exchange 5.5 Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word Document/whatever file. Can this be done without exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NDR
For some reason my Exchange 2k server isn't sending NDR reports to external senders when they try to send an e-mail with an attachment larger then what is allowed. Instead of getting an NDR it just sits in the senders mail server until it times out a couple of days later. Could I be missing a setting somewhere? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Another possibility is using pgp or certificates to encrypt the e-mail you send. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 17:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Have a look at MS Q319267 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2003 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet what is TLS? Sorry if this is a stupid question. :) Sam -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Address Lists
Yes. Use the header.exe tool to create your .csv file and the Directory Export option within the Exchange Admin program. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Address Lists To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the SMTP addresses out of our Exchange 5.5 Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word Document/whatever file. Can this be done without exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show you in the from? That is block and still be able to send from home account to work account. Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Address Lists
Yeah, just only put proxyaddresses in the CSV header Then you will need to parse the exported file and remove non-SMTP addresses (like X.400, MSMAIL, etc.) -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Address Lists To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the SMTP addresses out of our Exchange 5.5 Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word Document/whatever file. Can this be done without exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
Yes...Exchange version? I'll assume 5.5, since that's the only one I can address. With Ex5.5, in the properties of your IMS, Connections tab, Message filtering... button, add your domain name in there. You would add @luminet.net. If you are connected via VPN/dial-up, then you are connected internally to the Exchange server, which means any e-mail you send will be sent via MAPI internally or OUT through the IMS...it won't be coming in through the IMS. And if you aren't connected via VPN/Dial-up, then I would assume you would be sending from a personal e-mail address, in which case adding your company domain name isn't going to block that either. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show you in the from? That is block and still be able to send from home account to work account. Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Address Lists
I've got a script that does that: (link might wrap) http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&r eq=viewarticle&artid=2&page=1 -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: SMTP Address Lists > > > To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the > SMTP addresses > out of our Exchange 5.5 > Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word > Document/whatever file. > Can this be done without > exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all? > > Thanks! > > Robert > > > *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** > This electronic mail message and any attachments to this > electronic mail message contain confidential information > belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client > privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended > only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the > recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended > recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, > copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in > reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this electronic mail message in error, please forward the > electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then > remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. > *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Transport Level Security or Transport Layer Security (sorry I am too lazy to look up the exact definition) You can setup the SMTP Virtual server to use TLS. And the receiving SMTP server should be also set up to use TLS. You assign a digital certificate to both of them, just like when you set up SSL. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet what is TLS? Sorry if this is a stupid question. :) Sam -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa exchange 5.5
You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa exchange 5.5
Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom install) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa exchange 5.5
the way I look at it..is IF i load anything new on a server then I should figure I need to re service pack it. especially anything which interacts that tightly with the OS actually you didnt need to bother with the 2.0 then 3.0 to 4.0 you could have jumped right to 4.0 on the option pack. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa exchange 5.5
Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500 error When I try to open the web by ip address. The default web site should open if I'm not mistaken!! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom install) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa exchange 5.5
If IIS was not installed when you installed Exchange, OWA did not get installed. Look at your IIS manager. Do you see the Exchange virtual directory? If not then it is not installed. As with any piece of software, always reinstall the latest service pack after running the install. It won't hurt it. I know there are OWA updates in SP4 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500 error When I try to open the web by ip address. The default web site should open if I'm not mistaken!! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom install) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
James, appreciate you trying to think of a solution. It could be anyone emailing to work from home in our organization from personal email address. Guess I will have to try for a subject block, so far these emails have been about home loans. The spammers are sure getting clever. The message in the body is graphic and then there is a whole bunch of nonsense characters. Bill -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Yes...Exchange version? I'll assume 5.5, since that's the only one I can address. With Ex5.5, in the properties of your IMS, Connections tab, Message filtering... button, add your domain name in there. You would add @luminet.net. If you are connected via VPN/dial-up, then you are connected internally to the Exchange server, which means any e-mail you send will be sent via MAPI internally or OUT through the IMS...it won't be coming in through the IMS. And if you aren't connected via VPN/Dial-up, then I would assume you would be sending from a personal e-mail address, in which case adding your company domain name isn't going to block that either. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show you in the from? That is block and still be able to send from home account to work account. Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
Since we're on the subject, what have people been doing to counteract the p*rn messages their receiving that have images embedded in them? Just set up a block on the address or anyone have a more inventive solution? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Kuhl Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself James, appreciate you trying to think of a solution. It could be anyone emailing to work from home in our organization from personal email address. Guess I will have to try for a subject block, so far these emails have been about home loans. The spammers are sure getting clever. The message in the body is graphic and then there is a whole bunch of nonsense characters. Bill -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Yes...Exchange version? I'll assume 5.5, since that's the only one I can address. With Ex5.5, in the properties of your IMS, Connections tab, Message filtering... button, add your domain name in there. You would add @luminet.net. If you are connected via VPN/dial-up, then you are connected internally to the Exchange server, which means any e-mail you send will be sent via MAPI internally or OUT through the IMS...it won't be coming in through the IMS. And if you aren't connected via VPN/Dial-up, then I would assume you would be sending from a personal e-mail address, in which case adding your company domain name isn't going to block that either. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show you in the from? That is block and still be able to send from home account to work account. Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support it, TLS is an option. Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Connectivity
I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect to the Exchange server, I get a prompt to retry, work offline or cancel. If I hit retry, the message pops back up as fast as the screen can redraw. Internet Explorer works fine. I can successfully ping my exchange server from a command prompt using only the server name. I can not find any software or utilities installed by Comcast. The laptop had Office 2000. I upgraded to Office XP SP2, this has not helped. AOL is installed on this laptop, and there is a LAN connection with a WAN network driver from AOL. I have this disabled. The only other LAN connection is the one I have setup and IE is using this one without any problems. Any suggestions as to how to get outlook to see the network would be much appreciated. Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Is the SMTP server on mail.kpafilms.com configured to accept mail for the kpafilms.com domain? This could very well be their problem. The internal names would more affect you receiving mail from them (and it being blocked by aggressive anti-spam settings). For the most part, it should be okay. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender more info I gleaned from their IT guy: Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of their sending server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com doesn't exist. I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I can send to them from any other account. Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com take over it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, let me take a stab at this... Because of this: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not the domain itself? Example: Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver But If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Can we get the full headers for that NDR? Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very unimformative) I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery delayed report, we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the message. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Seeing as Casey has butchered the NDR's its nearly impossible to tell what's actually happening. However, its not *completely* impossible. penncolor.com *is* delivering the mail, and the reject is coming from their end: > Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com > mail.kpafilms.com[12.155.200.200](misconfigured sender)) Their Exchange (I presume) server (exbdc01.kpafilms.com) is rejecting the mail from their mail relay (mail.kpafilms.com), as is clearly spelled out by this slice of NDR. And, in this case, the fix is the same for Ex 5.5 and for E2k - beat the foreign postmaster about the head and shoulders with a 2x4 until they fix their mail issues. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > For some reason, it would appear that your mail server is delaying the > message, instead of trying the next highest MX record. Having two MX > records, with the first bein
Re: Outlook Connectivity
sounds like a DNS issue From: "William E. Grever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Outlook Connectivity Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:13:50 -0400 I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect to the Exchange server, I get a prompt to retry, work offline or cancel. If I hit retry, the message pops back up as fast as the screen can redraw. Internet Explorer works fine. I can successfully ping my exchange server from a command prompt using only the server name. I can not find any software or utilities installed by Comcast. The laptop had Office 2000. I upgraded to Office XP SP2, this has not helped. AOL is installed on this laptop, and there is a LAN connection with a WAN network driver from AOL. I have this disabled. The only other LAN connection is the one I have setup and IE is using this one without any problems. Any suggestions as to how to get outlook to see the network would be much appreciated. Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Connectivity
Did the comcast guy enable any port blocking? Can you nbtstat -A to the exchange servers IP address and see the results? Jim -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Connectivity I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect to the Exchange server, I get a prompt to retry, work offline or cancel. If I hit retry, the message pops back up as fast as the screen can redraw. Internet Explorer works fine. I can successfully ping my exchange server from a command prompt using only the server name. I can not find any software or utilities installed by Comcast. The laptop had Office 2000. I upgraded to Office XP SP2, this has not helped. AOL is installed on this laptop, and there is a LAN connection with a WAN network driver from AOL. I have this disabled. The only other LAN connection is the one I have setup and IE is using this one without any problems. Any suggestions as to how to get outlook to see the network would be much appreciated. Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa exchange 5.5
I Understand Just wondering why the default.asp page will not run. Not from OWA just from the default web server. Usually I would test the web portion before moving on to OWA! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 If IIS was not installed when you installed Exchange, OWA did not get installed. Look at your IIS manager. Do you see the Exchange virtual directory? If not then it is not installed. As with any piece of software, always reinstall the latest service pack after running the install. It won't hurt it. I know there are OWA updates in SP4 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500 error When I try to open the web by ip address. The default web site should open if I'm not mistaken!! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom install) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailt
RE: misconfigured sender
Let's go back to the MX record: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com (This server is fine) kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com (server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so it's not going to roll over to the next server). This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru but e-mail addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is. Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all internal to their DNS stuff. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender more info I gleaned from their IT guy: Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of their sending server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com doesn't exist. I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I can send to them from any other account. Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com take over it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, let me take a stab at this... Because of this: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not the domain itself? Example: Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver But If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Can we get the full headers for that NDR? Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very unimformative) I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery delayed report, we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the message. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Seeing as Casey has butchered the NDR's its nearly impossible to tell what's actually happening. However, its not *completely* impossible. penncolor.com *is* delivering the mail, and the reject is coming from their end: > Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com > mail.kpafilms.com[12.155.200.200](misconfigured sender)) Their Exchange (I presume) server (exbdc01.kpafilms.com) is rejecting the mail from their mail relay (mail.kpafilms.com), as is clearly spelled out by this slice of NDR. And, in this case, the fix is the same for Ex 5.5 and for E2k - beat the foreign postmaster about the head and shoulders with a 2x4 until they fix their mail issues. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > For some reason, it would appear that your mail server is d
RE: owa exchange 5.5
go to the actual server itself, bring up a browser http://localhost see what happens. If that doesn't work need to look at IIS -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 I Understand Just wondering why the default.asp page will not run. Not from OWA just from the default web server. Usually I would test the web portion before moving on to OWA! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 If IIS was not installed when you installed Exchange, OWA did not get installed. Look at your IIS manager. Do you see the Exchange virtual directory? If not then it is not installed. As with any piece of software, always reinstall the latest service pack after running the install. It won't hurt it. I know there are OWA updates in SP4 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500 error When I try to open the web by ip address. The default web site should open if I'm not mistaken!! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom install) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List a
RE: owa exchange 5.5
Right that's where I get the 500 internal error. So I know the ODBC dll and ODBC Driver manger are reported different versions but I did not think this would stop an asp page from opening. I checked the MS mdac download page but I do not know which one to download??!! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 go to the actual server itself, bring up a browser http://localhost see what happens. If that doesn't work need to look at IIS -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 I Understand Just wondering why the default.asp page will not run. Not from OWA just from the default web server. Usually I would test the web portion before moving on to OWA! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 If IIS was not installed when you installed Exchange, OWA did not get installed. Look at your IIS manager. Do you see the Exchange virtual directory? If not then it is not installed. As with any piece of software, always reinstall the latest service pack after running the install. It won't hurt it. I know there are OWA updates in SP4 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500 error When I try to open the web by ip address. The default web site should open if I'm not mistaken!! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom install) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral "The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll)". I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyri
RE: Outlook Connectivity
I get a NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table and mac address with the nbtstat -A to the Ex server's IP address. Will -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity Did the comcast guy enable any port blocking? Can you nbtstat -A to the exchange servers IP address and see the results? Jim -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Connectivity I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect to the Exchange server, I get a prompt to retry, work offline or cancel. If I hit retry, the message pops back up as fast as the screen can redraw. Internet Explorer works fine. I can successfully ping my exchange server from a command prompt using only the server name. I can not find any software or utilities installed by Comcast. The laptop had Office 2000. I upgraded to Office XP SP2, this has not helped. AOL is installed on this laptop, and there is a LAN connection with a WAN network driver from AOL. I have this disabled. The only other LAN connection is the one I have setup and IE is using this one without any problems. Any suggestions as to how to get outlook to see the network would be much appreciated. Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Connectivity
sounds good... H (going away to ponder again) -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity I get a NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table and mac address with the nbtstat -A to the Ex server's IP address. Will -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity Did the comcast guy enable any port blocking? Can you nbtstat -A to the exchange servers IP address and see the results? Jim -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Connectivity I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect to the Exchange server, I get a prompt to retry, work offline or cancel. If I hit retry, the message pops back up as fast as the screen can redraw. Internet Explorer works fine. I can successfully ping my exchange server from a command prompt using only the server name. I can not find any software or utilities installed by Comcast. The laptop had Office 2000. I upgraded to Office XP SP2, this has not helped. AOL is installed on this laptop, and there is a LAN connection with a WAN network driver from AOL. I have this disabled. The only other LAN connection is the one I have setup and IE is using this one without any problems. Any suggestions as to how to get outlook to see the network would be much appreciated. Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
It doesn't matter whether the host is up and not accepting SMTP connections or completely down. The sending mail server will try the next highest MX record. The only time a sending mail server will give up is if NONE of the MXs are available and the retry period is up, OR if it receives an actual SMTP error code from the receiving server. So, either Casey's SMTP server is not configured to try all possible MX records (a violation of RFC2821 I believe), OR mail.kpafilmes.com isn't configured to accept mail for the kpafilms.com domain. At least, that's what I think... ;) Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Let's go back to the MX record: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com (This server is fine) kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com (server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so it's not going to roll over to the next server). This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru but e-mail addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is. Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all internal to their DNS stuff. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender more info I gleaned from their IT guy: Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of their sending server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com doesn't exist. I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I can send to them from any other account. Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com take over it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, let me take a stab at this... Because of this: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not the domain itself? Example: Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver But If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Can we get the full headers for that NDR? Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very unimformative) I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery delayed report, we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the message. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Seeing as Casey has butchered the NDR's its nearly impossible to tell what's actually happening. However, its not *completely* impossible. penncolor.com *is* delivering the mail, and the
RE: Outlook Connectivity
The plot thickens. I cannot browse my network. The Network Identification in the System Properties says I am in my Domain (please no J. Seinfeld references) not in a Comcast workgroup. But the Network ID and Properties buttons are grayed out and there is a note saying "The identification of the computer cannot be changed because -Networking is not installed or is not properly configured. Will -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity sounds good... H (going away to ponder again) -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity I get a NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table and mac address with the nbtstat -A to the Ex server's IP address. Will -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity Did the comcast guy enable any port blocking? Can you nbtstat -A to the exchange servers IP address and see the results? Jim -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Connectivity I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect to the Exchange server, I get a prompt to retry, work offline or cancel. If I hit retry, the message pops back up as fast as the screen can redraw. Internet Explorer works fine. I can successfully ping my exchange server from a command prompt using only the server name. I can not find any software or utilities installed by Comcast. The laptop had Office 2000. I upgraded to Office XP SP2, this has not helped. AOL is installed on this laptop, and there is a LAN connection with a WAN network driver from AOL. I have this disabled. The only other LAN connection is the one I have setup and IE is using this one without any problems. Any suggestions as to how to get outlook to see the network would be much appreciated. Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Connectivity
Ok...I feel like a dunce. Microsoft Networking Client had been removed. Will -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity The plot thickens. I cannot browse my network. The Network Identification in the System Properties says I am in my Domain (please no J. Seinfeld references) not in a Comcast workgroup. But the Network ID and Properties buttons are grayed out and there is a note saying "The identification of the computer cannot be changed because -Networking is not installed or is not properly configured. Will -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity sounds good... H (going away to ponder again) -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity I get a NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table and mac address with the nbtstat -A to the Ex server's IP address. Will -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity Did the comcast guy enable any port blocking? Can you nbtstat -A to the exchange servers IP address and see the results? Jim -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Connectivity I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect to the Exchange server, I get a prompt to retry, work offline or cancel. If I hit retry, the message pops back up as fast as the screen can redraw. Internet Explorer works fine. I can successfully ping my exchange server from a command prompt using only the server name. I can not find any software or utilities installed by Comcast. The laptop had Office 2000. I upgraded to Office XP SP2, this has not helped. AOL is installed on this laptop, and there is a LAN connection with a WAN network driver from AOL. I have this disabled. The only other LAN connection is the one I have setup and IE is using this one without any problems. Any suggestions as to how to get outlook to see the network would be much appreciated. Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info Kpafilms however does receive mail from all other domains but our's -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Let's go back to the MX record: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com (This server is fine) kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com (server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so it's not going to roll over to the next server). This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru but e-mail addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is. Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all internal to their DNS stuff. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender more info I gleaned from their IT guy: Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of their sending server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com doesn't exist. I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I can send to them from any other account. Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com take over it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, let me take a stab at this... Because of this: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not the domain itself? Example: Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver But If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Can we get the full headers for that NDR? Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very unimformative) I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery delayed report, we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the message. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Seeing as Casey has butchered the NDR's its nearly impossible to tell what's actually happening. However, its not *completely* impossible. penncolor.com *is* delivering the mail, and the reject is coming from their end: > Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com > mail.kpafilms.com[12.155.200.200](misconfigured sender)) Their Exchange (I presume) server (exbdc01.kpafilms.com) is rejecting the mail from their mail relay (mail.kpafilms.com), as is clearly spelled out by this slice of NDR. And, in this case, the fix is the same for Ex 5.5 and for E2k - beat the foreign postmaster about the head and shoulders with a 2x4 until they fix their mail issues. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS
RE: misconfigured sender
I should say, is able to receive mail form all other domains but ours. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info Kpafilms however does receive mail from all other domains but our's -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Let's go back to the MX record: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com (This server is fine) kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com (server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so it's not going to roll over to the next server). This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru but e-mail addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is. Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all internal to their DNS stuff. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender more info I gleaned from their IT guy: Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of their sending server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com doesn't exist. I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I can send to them from any other account. Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com take over it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, let me take a stab at this... Because of this: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not the domain itself? Example: Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver But If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Can we get the full headers for that NDR? Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very unimformative) I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery delayed report, we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the message. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Seeing as Casey has butchered the NDR's its nearly impossible to tell what's actually happening. However, its not *completely* impossible. penncolor.com *is* delivering the mail, and the reject is coming from their end: > Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com > mail.kpafilms.com[12.155.200.200](misconfigured sender)) Their Exchange (I presume) server (exbdc01.kpafilms.com) is rejecting the mail from their mail relay (mail.kpafilms.com), as is clearly spelled out by this slice of NDR. And, in this case, the fix is the same fo
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
Blackhole the sites at your router. It's a courtesy issue to notify the admins for the IP block. The images almost always link back to the sites and are not imbedded in the images themselves. -- be - MOS If God dropped acid, would he see people? -- Steven Wright > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself > > > Since we're on the subject, what have people been doing to counteract > the p*rn messages their receiving that have images embedded in them? > Just set up a block on the address or anyone have a more inventive > solution? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Kuhl > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:47 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself > > > James, appreciate you trying to think of a solution. It could > be anyone > emailing to work from home in our organization from personal email > address. Guess I will have to try for a subject block, so far these > emails have been about home loans. > > The spammers are sure getting clever. The message in the body > is graphic > and then there is a whole bunch of nonsense characters. > > Bill > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself > > > Yes...Exchange version? I'll assume 5.5, since that's the only one I > can address. > > With Ex5.5, in the properties of your IMS, Connections tab, Message > filtering... button, add your domain name in there. You would add > @luminet.net. > > If you are connected via VPN/dial-up, then you are connected > internally > to the Exchange server, which means any e-mail you send will > be sent via > MAPI internally or OUT through the IMS...it won't be coming in through > the IMS. And if you aren't connected via VPN/Dial-up, then I would > assume you would be sending from a personal e-mail address, in which > case adding your company domain name isn't going to block that either. > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself > > > Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show > you in the > from? That is block and still be able to send from home > account to work > account. > > Bill Kuhl > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
Use Outlook 2003 :) Except not on porn that comes to public folders - MS refuses to block images in posts - they say it was a bug that it worked in earlier beta builds. When the images are included in the message, use autopreview to instead of preview pane scan for spam to delete. We're doing domain blocking and it works well for most spam, but the porn seems to come from too many legit domains and is difficult to block. -Original Message- Since we're on the subject, what have people been doing to counteract the p*rn messages their receiving that have images embedded in them? Just set up a block on the address or anyone have a more inventive solution? Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm wrong but the easiest way in this instance would be to just encrypt the e-mail. Windows does provide CA and you can always get another certificate from a known source. Another way to go is to use pgp or some offshoot of that. I don't know but sometimes we (designers/administrators) get a little over excited using technology we don't really have to use. Well, just my 5 cents. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 19:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support it, TLS is an option. Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Or, if it's always sent as an attachment, PKzip v6.0 is pretty good and a lot easier than setting up email encryption. Of course, there is the hassle of zipping the file, exchanging the password with the recipient and knowing that only the attachment is encrypted. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm wrong but the easiest way in this instance would be to just encrypt the e-mail. Windows does provide CA and you can always get another certificate from a known source. Another way to go is to use pgp or some offshoot of that. I don't know but sometimes we (designers/administrators) get a little over excited using technology we don't really have to use. Well, just my 5 cents. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 19:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support it, TLS is an option. Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
I didn't suggest it, I said it was an option. I suggested using GPG to encrypt it. It is a good point, though. TLS is a PITA to setup, and doesn't actually secure the e-mail once it arrives. GPG is much easier to use, and more secure, in that the message can only be seen by the intended recipient (provided your secret key is safe). Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm wrong but the easiest way in this instance would be to just encrypt the e-mail. Windows does provide CA and you can always get another certificate from a known source. Another way to go is to use pgp or some offshoot of that. I don't know but sometimes we (designers/administrators) get a little over excited using technology we don't really have to use. Well, just my 5 cents. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 19:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support it, TLS is an option. Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Yeps, you are right, you did suggest gnp, I just read the thread and thought WHAT, WHY?!? and responded to the last message, it wasn't meant to be a response to your message but to the thread. :) There are numerous ways to do this but TLS would not be my first choice. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 22:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet I didn't suggest it, I said it was an option. I suggested using GPG to encrypt it. It is a good point, though. TLS is a PITA to setup, and doesn't actually secure the e-mail once it arrives. GPG is much easier to use, and more secure, in that the message can only be seen by the intended recipient (provided your secret key is safe). Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm wrong but the easiest way in this instance would be to just encrypt the e-mail. Windows does provide CA and you can always get another certificate from a known source. Another way to go is to use pgp or some offshoot of that. I don't know but sometimes we (designers/administrators) get a little over excited using technology we don't really have to use. Well, just my 5 cents. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 19:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support it, TLS is an option. Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Details Templates Exchange 2000
In system manager under Recipients, Details Templates, English, User, Template, Add, Edit how do I add an attribute in the Field pick list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
That's one of the ways that spammers are getting around content filters - using HTML formatted docs with embedded images of words which are commonly blocked. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:47 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself > > > James, appreciate you trying to think of a solution. It could > be anyone emailing to work from home in our organization from > personal email address. Guess I will have to try for a > subject block, so far these emails have been about home loans. > > The spammers are sure getting clever. The message in the body > is graphic and then there is a whole bunch of nonsense characters. > > Bill > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself > > > Yes...Exchange version? I'll assume 5.5, since that's the > only one I can > address. > > With Ex5.5, in the properties of your IMS, Connections tab, Message > filtering... button, add your domain name in there. You would add > @luminet.net. > > If you are connected via VPN/dial-up, then you are connected > internally to > the Exchange server, which means any e-mail you send will be > sent via MAPI > internally or OUT through the IMS...it won't be coming in > through the IMS. > And if you aren't connected via VPN/Dial-up, then I would > assume you would > be sending from a personal e-mail address, in which case > adding your company > domain name isn't going to block that either. > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself > > > Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show > you in the > from? That is block and still be able to send from home > account to work > account. > > Bill Kuhl > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Then you've got something strange going on with your IMS. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > I should say, is able to receive mail form all other domains but ours. > > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info > > Kpafilms however does receive mail from all other domains but our's > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Let's go back to the MX record: > > kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com > (This server is fine) > > kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com > (server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so > it's not going to roll over to the next server). > > This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru > but e-mail > addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is. > > Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all > internal to their DNS stuff. > > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > more info I gleaned from their IT guy: > > Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns > name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX > record for the > server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com > > Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that > possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I > look at the > headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of > their sending > server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com > ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of > mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com > doesn't exist. > I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a > bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I > can send to > them from any other account. > > Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com > take over > it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is > the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Well, let me take a stab at this... > > Because of this: > kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com > kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com > > Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to > MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port > 25. However, > when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not > the domain itself? > > Example: > > Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver > > But > > If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine > > Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record > > -Original Message- > From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Can we get the full headers for that NDR? > > Steven > --- > Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Network Administrator > The Key School, Annapolis Maryland > > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very > unimformative) > I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery > delayed report, > we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the > message. > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. > > YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. > > Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Messa
RE: misconfigured sender
I was thinking that as well, just not sure where to look and we can receive and send mail to everyone so if it's something strange with my IMS then it's my IMS having a grudge against kpafilms.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Then you've got something strange going on with your IMS. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > I should say, is able to receive mail form all other domains but ours. > > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info > > Kpafilms however does receive mail from all other domains but our's > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Let's go back to the MX record: > > kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com > (This server is fine) > > kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com > (server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so > it's not going to roll over to the next server). > > This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru > but e-mail > addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is. > > Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all > internal to their DNS stuff. > > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > more info I gleaned from their IT guy: > > Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns > name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for > the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com > > Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that > possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at > the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of > their sending > server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com > ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of > mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com > doesn't exist. > I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a > bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I > can send to > them from any other account. > > Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com > take over > it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is > the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Well, let me take a stab at this... > > Because of this: > kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com > kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com > > Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to > MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. > However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the > connection. -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not > the domain itself? > > Example: > > Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver > > But > > If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine > > Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record > > -Original Message- > From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Can we get the full headers for that NDR? > > Steven > --- > Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Network Administrator > The Key School, Annapolis Maryland > > -Original Message- > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender > > > Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very > unimformative) > I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery > de
RE: Details Templates Exchange 2000
I don't believe you can. David Sengupta -Original Message- From: Bernard Chouinard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Details Templates Exchange 2000 In system manager under Recipients, Details Templates, English, User, Template, Add, Edit how do I add an attribute in the Field pick list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Ok I suggested it.
Because from what I read, they want to always send mail to the same destination in a
secure way ("We want to send reports to the
State that contain information about our students")
In order to use PKI encryption, they would have to ask the recipient to obtain a
certificate first, then get the recipient's public key from a digitally signed
message, then always remember to encrypt individual messages.
With TLS, you set it up once and then start sending e-mail - the server does the job
of encrypting the transmission every time.
If I had to send encrypted mail to many different destinations, I would sure go with
PKI or maybe PGP. But when you are targeting the same place all the time, why not TLS?
-Original Message-
From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody
suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every
mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the
communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm
wrong but the easiest way in this instance would be to just encrypt the
e-mail. Windows does provide CA and you can always get another certificate
from a known source. Another way to go is to use pgp or some offshoot of
that. I don't know but sometimes we (designers/administrators) get a little
over excited using technology we don't really have to use.
Well, just my 5 cents.
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 19:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support
it, TLS is an option.
Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Outlook 2000 and XP clients
Hello All.
I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the
State that contain information about our students. The information
contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private.
Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via
email over the Internet.
Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated.
SSL only provides secure logonsright???
Thanks for any help.
Samantha
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging
I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging
Implement something like http://www.attachstor.com/ perhaps... -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:25 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
Now wouldn't it be nice to have an addin for Outlook that replaced all external content in a HTML message with blank graphics? Sometimes it's nice to be able to see the HTML formatted correctly, but not send back a "flag" saying your email address is valid. Maybe and Exchange Event sink to do this? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users managing Distribution List membership
Hi All, FYI: Didn't get any replies so I rang PSS to see if it's going to be resolved. Apparently not "this is an informational only field" strange as it appeared to work in mixed mode...but then again maybe that was using Ex 5.5. Cheers, Phil > -Original Message- > From: Phil Thomas > Sent: Monday, 14 July 2003 8:41 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Users managing Distribution List membership > > Hi All, > > Since migrating to Exchange Server 2000 SP3 Native mode any newly created mail > enabled groups can't be managed by an Owner (Managed by). Q281489 has a "work > around" but this is a little tedious as a long term solution and was hoping for a > better solution if anyone has one or if this might be fixed in the next SP. > > Thanks in advanced, > Cheers, > Phil > > > > Phil Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > IT Infrastructure Phone: (07) 38298203 > Redland Shire Council Mobile: 0408 151 120 > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
Or you could upgrade to outlook 11 which does that out of the box by blocking external content My $0.02 :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PF: Exchange Sent: 17 July 2003 22:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Now wouldn't it be nice to have an addin for Outlook that replaced all external content in a HTML message with blank graphics? Sometimes it's nice to be able to see the HTML formatted correctly, but not send back a "flag" saying your email address is valid. Maybe and Exchange Event sink to do this? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch2003 & Antivirus
What antivirus solutions are available either for purchase or download or in beta? I looked at Trend, Sybari and Symantec, but didn't find any product references to Exchange 2003. I did see on Symantec site the url for the Beta for Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange. Anyone tried this yet? http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?productid=66 (At the very bottom of the page) Anyone else gone through this process yet? - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2003 & Antivirus
Latest build for Ex2000 from Symantec will install on 2K3 (though if you enable content filter it faults and restarts a lot). For now though at least it is something. Previous versions didn't even install. Although they won't support it, obviously they have an "unofficial" change of heart. -Original Message- From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 19:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch2003 & Antivirus What antivirus solutions are available either for purchase or download or in beta? I looked at Trend, Sybari and Symantec, but didn't find any product references to Exchange 2003. I did see on Symantec site the url for the Beta for Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange. Anyone tried this yet? http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?productid=66 (At the very bottom of the page) Anyone else gone through this process yet? - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
There are a few options for users stuck on earlier versions of Outlook: WYB (www.grinningshark.com) has an addin that strips html outlook 2002 has a readasplain key Chilton preview doesn't render html. I recommend Chilton - it's donationware and doesn't screw up the html for the messages you want as html. -Original Message- Now wouldn't it be nice to have an addin for Outlook that replaced all external content in a HTML message with blank graphics? Sometimes it's nice to be able to see the HTML formatted correctly, but not send back a "flag" saying your email address is valid. Maybe and Exchange Event sink to do this? Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New mail alert
Hi all can anyone tell me how i can send a sms alert to a user's phone when there is a new mail in his mail box on exhange 2000 server. Thanks, Maruthi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New mail alert
Does the users have a e-mail address for their phone? I have a nextel phone that I can send a message to using ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and all is good. Use the rules wizard in outlook to create a server side rule. Look here for some examples: http://www.slipstick.com/rules/index.htm - David - Original Message - From: "Krishna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:39 PM Subject: New mail alert > Hi all > > can anyone tell me how i can send a sms alert to a user's phone when there > is a new mail in his mail box on exhange 2000 server. > > Thanks, > Maruthi > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself
I have it all sent to my mailbox. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Since we're on the subject, what have people been doing to counteract the p*rn messages their receiving that have images embedded in them? Just set up a block on the address or anyone have a more inventive solution? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Kuhl Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself James, appreciate you trying to think of a solution. It could be anyone emailing to work from home in our organization from personal email address. Guess I will have to try for a subject block, so far these emails have been about home loans. The spammers are sure getting clever. The message in the body is graphic and then there is a whole bunch of nonsense characters. Bill -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Yes...Exchange version? I'll assume 5.5, since that's the only one I can address. With Ex5.5, in the properties of your IMS, Connections tab, Message filtering... button, add your domain name in there. You would add @luminet.net. If you are connected via VPN/dial-up, then you are connected internally to the Exchange server, which means any e-mail you send will be sent via MAPI internally or OUT through the IMS...it won't be coming in through the IMS. And if you aren't connected via VPN/Dial-up, then I would assume you would be sending from a personal e-mail address, in which case adding your company domain name isn't going to block that either. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show you in the from? That is block and still be able to send from home account to work account. Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
