RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Hmm. Technet's wrong. We run 1300 all over the place (it's the Cisco client). Are you still receiving the need to fragment message? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Thanks for this Roger. However the ping still doesn't work at 1400. Technet says not to set this below 1400, what else can I do? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NDR-The recipient name is not recognized
Hi all, We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT 4.0 SP6a box. All internet email incoming and outgoing works fine except to one site. This company can send us email, but if we reply or send email we get an immediate NDR. The NDR says that The recipient name is not recognized ääåãòä ùìê ìà äâéòä ìçì÷ îäðîòðéí äîéåòãéí àå ìëåìí. ðåùà:þCupboard (room 004) ðùìçä: þ14-Jul-03 10:46 AM îñéøú ääåãòä ìðîòðéí äáàéí ìà äöìéçä: 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' á- 14-Jul-03 10:46 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Fine Care LTD;l=SERVER-030714084550Z-6 KB article Q133403 says that this means that the MTA doesn't recognize the address type as a deliverable type. But, the other location is using SMTP, Exchange 5.5 as well. My address Space for the IMS connector has SMTP entered as the only address property. I can connect to domain from telnet domainname.com 25 use mail from: and rcpt to: command I get error message Client host rejected.Acess denied Any one has a clue of the solution? Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated Thanks Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized
Your system does not recognize - 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' - as a legitimate address. Try typing it out in the format - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or whatever the correct SMTP address for Galina is. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Niko Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized Hi all, We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT 4.0 SP6a box. All internet email incoming and outgoing works fine except to one site. This company can send us email, but if we reply or send email we get an immediate NDR. The NDR says that The recipient name is not recognized ääåãòä ùìê ìà äâéòä ìçì÷ îäethîòethéí äîéåòãéí àå ìëåìí. ethåùà:thornCupboard (room 004) ethùìçä: thorn14-Jul-03 10:46 AM îñéøú ääåãòä ìethîòethéí äáàéí ìà äöìéçä: 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' á- 14-Jul-03 10:46 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Fine Care LTD;l=SERVER-030714084550Z-6 KB article Q133403 says that this means that the MTA doesn't recognize the address type as a deliverable type. But, the other location is using SMTP, Exchange 5.5 as well. My address Space for the IMS connector has SMTP entered as the only address property. I can connect to domain from telnet domainname.com 25 use mail from: and rcpt to: command I get error message Client host rejected.Acess denied Any one has a clue of the solution? Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated Thanks Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Why would technet say not to adjust the MTU? I have found it is neccesary to adjust this setting in a number of instances (probably depending on routers in the path). I have dumped it all the way down to 576, and have not had a difficulty that I can remember. Jim -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hmm. Technet's wrong. We run 1300 all over the place (it's the Cisco client). Are you still receiving the need to fragment message? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Thanks for this Roger. However the ping still doesn't work at 1400. Technet says not to set this below 1400, what else can I do? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
It's a performance thing, really. The lower the MTU the higher the percentage of overhead due to the packet header. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Why would technet say not to adjust the MTU? I have found it is neccesary to adjust this setting in a number of instances (probably depending on routers in the path). I have dumped it all the way down to 576, and have not had a difficulty that I can remember. Jim -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hmm. Technet's wrong. We run 1300 all over the place (it's the Cisco client). Are you still receiving the need to fragment message? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Thanks for this Roger. However the ping still doesn't work at 1400. Technet says not to set this below 1400, what else can I do? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: owa exchange 5.5
Problem solved did need to load mdac 2.5. Web now works. Loaded OWA no problems. Thanks -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 If IIS was not installed when you installed Exchange, OWA did not get installed. Look at your IIS manager. Do you see the Exchange virtual directory? If not then it is not installed. As with any piece of software, always reinstall the latest service pack after running the install. It won't hurt it. I know there are OWA updates in SP4 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500 error When I try to open the web by ip address. The default web site should open if I'm not mistaken!! -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom install) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll). I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
ipconfig /flushdns - Original Message - From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
do you also publish the exchange server through an ISA server for external RPC access? - Original Message - From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:15 PM Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Thanks for this Roger. However the ping still doesn't work at 1400. Technet says not to set this below 1400, what else can I do? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change Password Option in OWA not working
Hello all, W2K SP3 w/ Exchange 5.5 SP4 and OWA on the same box I've loaded a test cert from Thawte and when I log into https://server/logon.asp https://server/logon.asp , go to Options and Change Password, I get the 404 file not found. I've created the virtual dir within the IS Mgr console according the KB's so I'm not sure what's wrong. I've associated .htr with the asp.dll. If I type in https://server/IISADMPWD/ https://server/IISADMPWD/ I still get a 404 error even though I've added a *.htr file to act as a default page. I tried this address on another server as a test and was able to get to it no problem so I'm sure it's a setting somewhere on this box. Any ideas? Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Local System Acount vs. Domain Account
With Exchange 2000 all Exchange services start up using the local system account. Should this be changed to use a domain account instead? I was told that this was a recomended Best Practice by Microsoft. Is this true? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I move
Exchange database on C drive and running out of space How Can I move it to another drive where I can space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I move
version of Exchange please From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I move Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 07:56:20 -0700 Exchange database on C drive and running out of space How Can I move it to another drive where I can space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I mov e
What version Exchange? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I move Exchange database on C drive and running out of space How Can I move it to another drive where I can space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account
Is anything broken? -Original Message- From: Randy Rohl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account With Exchange 2000 all Exchange services start up using the local system account. Should this be changed to use a domain account instead? I was told that this was a recomended Best Practice by Microsoft. Is this true? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized
Those Russians again -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized Your system does not recognize - 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' - as a legitimate address. Try typing it out in the format - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or whatever the correct SMTP address for Galina is. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Niko Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized Hi all, We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT 4.0 SP6a box. All internet email incoming and outgoing works fine except to one site. This company can send us email, but if we reply or send email we get an immediate NDR. The NDR says that The recipient name is not recognized ääåãòä ùìê ìà äâéòä ìçì÷ îäethîòethéí äîéåòãéí àå ìëåìí. ethåùà:thornCupboard (room 004) ethùìçä: thorn14-Jul-03 10:46 AM îñéøú ääåãòä ìethîòethéí äáàéí ìà äöìéçä: 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' á- 14-Jul-03 10:46 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Fine Care LTD;l=SERVER-030714084550Z-6 KB article Q133403 says that this means that the MTA doesn't recognize the address type as a deliverable type. But, the other location is using SMTP, Exchange 5.5 as well. My address Space for the IMS connector has SMTP entered as the only address property. I can connect to domain from telnet domainname.com 25 use mail from: and rcpt to: command I get error message Client host rejected.Acess denied Any one has a clue of the solution? Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated Thanks Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird logon issue with OWA
thanks! good idea! I actually have seen that happen a few times myself, although in those cases users could not log in at all. But it is still worth checking. -Original Message- From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA Also, check your permissions on the exchweb directory, not in IIS but actual folder permissions. That caused some problems for us also. Jason From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 22:57:20 -0400 You have to add the URL for your OWA box to the local intranet site within Internet Explore on the client machine in order for it to pass the login info. We have been playing with this for both OWA and for restricted access to certain files on our website and that seems to be the trick... Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: Sharma, Shshank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA I am facing the same problem. Trying to implement single sign-on. Having the user logged in once to an AD domain, the web-app should not prompt the user again. I have Integrated Windows Authentication (IWA) enabled, and all others disabled. On web application invokation, I see the login prompt. If I understand correctly, that is not what is supposed to happen. Any clues on something we are doing wrong ? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Since I am already logged onto the domain, I should not be prompted to log onto the website that runs in the same domain, if the website's security is set to use integrated windows authentication. No? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA It's a feature From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:45:24 -0400 I tested from my Win2K Pro desktop. Logged onto windows as the user. Started OWA - got prompted. -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA What desktop operating system are your users on? That could be your clue. Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:15 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: weird logon issue with OWA Subject: weird logon issue with OWA Hello again. Sorry for asking too many questions today. Our Exchange 2000 OWA is set up to use windows integrated authentication. Some users are reporting that when they go to OWA from their PC at work, they get prompted to enter their logon credentials. We have checked to make sure that their PCs were members of the windows domain - they are. The users don't have any problems logging onto the domain. What could be tripping IE to think that they need to authenticate? (we can reproduce this behavior when we log in as them on a different PC) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account
Leave it alone. There is no reason that you should change the account under which the Exchange services run. Who told you it was a recommended best practice? Microsoft PSS? Or someone you know that is pretending they know a lot? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Randy Rohl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:42 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account Subject: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account With Exchange 2000 all Exchange services start up using the local system account. Should this be changed to use a domain account instead? I was told that this was a recomended Best Practice by Microsoft. Is this true? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account
Who is telling you that? On 07/21/03 09:41, Randy Rohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With Exchange 2000 all Exchange services start up using the local system account. Should this be changed to use a domain account instead? I was told that this was a recomended Best Practice by Microsoft. Is this true? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Dude, What's up? I got the following error message from your mail server this morning: = Reporting-MTA: dns;mail1.penncolor.com Received-From-MTA: dns;MAIL.erc.rl.gov Arrival-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:11:32 -0400 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.1 X-Display-Name: Friese, Casey = Which would translate to: 5.X.X Permanent Failure X.2.1 Mailbox disabled, not accepting messages. Did you create a new mailbox for yourself, did you get fired or did changes to your system cause a problem? Just curious... -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:39 AM To: Blunt, James H (Jim) Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Kpafilms.com has removed their primary mx record of mi.kpafilms.com and mail started flowing smoothly again. I'm assuming that there was a problem with this server because connections would be made and then immediately dropped and because of that, the secondary mx rec wasn't taking over just as someone suggested here. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:13 PM To: Friese, Casey Subject: RE: misconfigured sender http://www.nemx.com/products/powertoolsadvanced/index.asp -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:59 PM To: Blunt, James H (Jim) Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Hehe, thanks for the info They're using Nemx Power Tools Advanced Edition I'm not familiar with it - never heard of it -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:56 PM To: Friese, Casey Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, good luck to ya dude. Let me know how it turns out. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:33 PM To: Blunt, James H (Jim) Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Nice, it's a wonder any mail get's through to them after all the time it takes to check messages against all of these lists: relays.visi.com relays.ordb.org blackholes.mail-abuse.org dialups.mail-abuse.org relays.mail-abuse.org rbl.maps.vix.com Those are the lists their incoming mail server checks against. Also, the mx record mi.kpafilms.com is a content filtering server -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:13 PM To: Friese, Casey Subject: RE: misconfigured sender It has something to do with what they are doing on the receiving end... If you go to www.samspade.org, scroll all the way to the bottom and put the domain name you want to check in the blackhole box and click the button. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:08 PM To: Blunt, James H (Jim) Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Not sure why I can send everywhere else though. Which RBL did you find that info from? Every list I look at doesn't have my dom listed. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:01 PM To: Friese, Casey Subject: RE: misconfigured sender It's Penncolor's web server that is on the RBL, not the mail servers. My guess would be that either someone is relaying through the IIS on that server and/or someone is spoofing the Penncolor domain name, which resolves to the 207.103.43.10 server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:33 AM To: Blunt, James H (Jim) Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Wow, that's odd. I don't know how the heck penncolor is on an RBL, I'm locked down tight or so I believe. Funny, I told the IT guy at kpafilms.com that I'm surprised he hasn't made it on an RBL yet because of his muffed headers. I'm using GFI's MailEssentials but I'm only scanning inbound for being listed on relays.ordb.org, nothing outbound from here is being scanned. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:19 PM To: Friese, Casey Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Casey, kpafilms.com is listed on two RBL's... 130.94.153.237 listed in FIVETEN(127.0.0.7) Five Ten (FIVETEN): added 2003-03-20; spam support - transit for AS10721 which is 64.251.0.0/19 infolink added 2003-06-17; spam support - hosting http://www.united-tech.com on 161.58.246.110 added 2003-07-01; spam support - hosting http://oll02198283l4672lo39102-42l3917y7u123-lo97687o876o58l-olol27373.u s on 207.196.86.75 added 2002-05-31; see http://groups.google.com/groups?frame=rightth=affdee09e48efec7seekm=uf dja3 ohikmb7d%40corp.supernews.com#link1 added 2002-08-27; spam support - see http://spews.org/ask.cgi?S1358 added 2003-03-21; spam support - hosting
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
We had the same issue and it was caused by a corrupt GPO. In our case, someone had rebooted a newly promoted DC before it had fully replicated. You can go into ADSI Edit and check the status for the lockout policy there. If corrupted it could very well be different here than what you in your GPO. -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, July 19, 2003 5:04 AM Posted To: dsm_lists Conversation: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves We had this issue once with a laptop running Outlook trying to log on to an Exchange mailbox with an old password. The account of the user was locked every 5 minutes Freddie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I mov e
This is exchange 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I mov e
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF001.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange database on C and running out of space How Can I mov e This is exchange 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PFINFO-duplicates
Hey guys I have an International org with multiple sites and I am doing some assessment work in preparation for Exchange 2000. When I ran PFINFO in one of my sites I got duplicates on about 90% of the public folders, any idea as to what could cause and what I should look at. I have not seen this on any of my other sites. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch/SP3 with Win2k/SP4
I haven't seen much with problems pertaining to installing Win2k SP4 on Google. Anything in particular that I should be aware of or be looking for before I take the plunge? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO-duplicates
A little more info, the dups are only under one hierarchy of folders and I do not see them when looking via MAPI -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:PFINFO-duplicates Hey guys I have an International org with multiple sites and I am doing some assessment work in preparation for Exchange 2000. When I ran PFINFO in one of my sites I got duplicates on about 90% of the public folders, any idea as to what could cause and what I should look at. I have not seen this on any of my other sites. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change Password Option in OWA not working
Hi All, Just to update, this is now fixed. The IIS URLScan tool was causing the grief. I uninstalled it and now it's working as expected. Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Password Option in OWA not working Hello all, W2K SP3 w/ Exchange 5.5 SP4 and OWA on the same box I've loaded a test cert from Thawte and when I log into https://server/logon.asp https://server/logon.asp , go to Options and Change Password, I get the 404 file not found. I've created the virtual dir within the IS Mgr console according the KB's so I'm not sure what's wrong. I've associated .htr with the asp.dll. If I type in https://server/IISADMPWD/ https://server/IISADMPWD/ I still get a 404 error even though I've added a *.htr file to act as a default page. I tried this address on another server as a test and was able to get to it no problem so I'm sure it's a setting somewhere on this box. Any ideas? Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Yes, both FQDN and netbios name resolve to the internal IP and work properly. -Warren -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Can they ping the FQDN? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routine Maintenance
Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
Back it up. Test your backups. Read the Event Logs. Verify your AV definitions are up to date. Leave it alone. Exchange is one of those products that really does run best when just left alone. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
I don't run any offline defrags. I leave that to Exchange's maintenance routines which I have found reliable. Beyond that I guess I would ask what other maintenance you want to know about. I have daily (check event logs and queues), weekly (AV DAT files updates, drive space checks, etc.), and monthly (database size check, traffic reports, etc.) duties I run. Then I have stuff that I do as needed. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Bridges, Samantha Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
No can you direct me where to look? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Have you checked the RPC Binding Order entry in the registry? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Can they ping the FQDN? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Yes we are receiving that message at 1400 over the VPN. I'll try 1300 thanks. -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hmm. Technet's wrong. We run 1300 all over the place (it's the Cisco client). Are you still receiving the need to fragment message? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Thanks for this Roger. However the ping still doesn't work at 1400. Technet says not to set this below 1400, what else can I do? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routine Maintenance
Why bother with them? - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:35 PM Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
No, no no no. I've heard that's a bad idea. ;) -Warren -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem do you also publish the exchange server through an ISA server for external RPC access? - Original Message - From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:15 PM Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Thanks for this Roger. However the ping still doesn't work at 1400. Technet says not to set this below 1400, what else can I do? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Error
Hi again, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3. Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and confirm passwords and it says Error number: -2147023569 . Then there's a link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing... Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Q163576 -- From: Warren Cundy Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem No can you direct me where to look? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Have you checked the RPC Binding Order entry in the registry? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Can they ping the FQDN? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just you should do them? The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was going to do a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services anyway. Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes an unnecessary interruption in uptime. As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are within your backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that offline defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount of deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall while you purchase the Enterprise edition. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Routine Maintenance Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
I have had 2GB+ of whitespace But I still woudn't waste time on doing an offline defrag -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just you should do them? The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was going to do a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services anyway. Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes an unnecessary interruption in uptime. As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are within your backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that offline defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount of deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall while you purchase the Enterprise edition. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Routine Maintenance Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird logon issue with OWA
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You have to add the URL for your OWA box to the local intranet site within Internet Explore on the client machine in order for it to pass the login info. Did that. Works ! Till now, I had the ASP on the server, and was logging using IE on the same box. Now, I am going to add a machine into the 2003 AD domain, and see if single sign-on really works for me. Thanks, Jeff. -Shshank Sharma QTC Management Inc. -Original Message- From: Sharma, Shshank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA I am facing the same problem. Trying to implement single sign-on. Having the user logged in once to an AD domain, the web-app should not prompt the user again. I have Integrated Windows Authentication (IWA) enabled, and all others disabled. On web application invokation, I see the login prompt. If I understand correctly, that is not what is supposed to happen. Any clues on something we are doing wrong ? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Since I am already logged onto the domain, I should not be prompted to log onto the website that runs in the same domain, if the website's security is set to use integrated windows authentication. No? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA It's a feature From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:45:24 -0400 I tested from my Win2K Pro desktop. Logged onto windows as the user. Started OWA - got prompted. -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA What desktop operating system are your users on? That could be your clue. Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:15 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: weird logon issue with OWA Subject: weird logon issue with OWA Hello again. Sorry for asking too many questions today. Our Exchange 2000 OWA is set up to use windows integrated authentication. Some users are reporting that when they go to OWA from their PC at work, they get prompted to enter their logon credentials. We have checked to make sure that their PCs were members of the windows domain - they are. The users don't have any problems logging onto the domain. What could be tripping IE to think that they need to authenticate? (we can reproduce this behavior when we log in as them on a different PC) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe:
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
So we should set TCP/IP first? What is Local RPC, is that some sort of netbios/netbeui protocol? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Q163576 -- From: Warren Cundy Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem No can you direct me where to look? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Have you checked the RPC Binding Order entry in the registry? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Can they ping the FQDN? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I know we discussed this at length before - I posted to the NT/2000
list, and got this back (first time). To say that I am not happy that
someone on the list is sending these to people on the lists is an
understatement.
Can we not bump this user? Where do they get off sending something like
this??
I am just angry...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail. Your
message has been queued for delivery. If you would like your message
delivered to my InBox, it will cost you $300.00.
This modest sum is enough to keep unwanted junk e-mail from flooding my
account. This e-mail was sent to you only because you contacted me by
e-mail. Thank you for your understanding.
If you choose not to pay, I completely understand, and I respect your
decision.
If your message is important, and you choose to pay $300.00 to allow
your e-mail through, the message will be automatically sent once PayPal
informs me that the payment has been made. There is no need to send the
message again.
You can pay me securely by PayPal with Visa, Mastercard, Discover or
American Express. If you do not have a PayPal account, you can sign up
for one at no cost.
Sign up for PayPal
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
LOL. I think it's hysterical.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I know we discussed this at length before - I posted to the NT/2000
list, and got this back (first time). To say that I am not happy that
someone on the list is sending these to people on the lists is an
understatement.
Can we not bump this user? Where do they get off sending something like
this??
I am just angry...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail. Your
message has been queued for delivery. If you would like your message
delivered to my InBox, it will cost you $300.00.
This modest sum is enough to keep unwanted junk e-mail from flooding my
account. This e-mail was sent to you only because you contacted me by
e-mail. Thank you for your understanding.
If you choose not to pay, I completely understand, and I respect your
decision.
If your message is important, and you choose to pay $300.00 to allow
your e-mail through, the message will be automatically sent once PayPal
informs me that the payment has been made. There is no need to send the
message again.
You can pay me securely by PayPal with Visa, Mastercard, Discover or
American Express. If you do not have a PayPal account, you can sign up
for one at no cost.
Sign up for PayPal
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
Missy,
In retrospect, I agree with you. Who thinks they can charge $300 to get
you to read an e-mail!! ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the size of boulders...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
LOL. I think it's hysterical.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I know we discussed this at length before - I posted to the
NT/2000 list, and got this back (first time). To say that I
am not happy that someone on the list is sending these to
people on the lists is an understatement.
Can we not bump this user? Where do they get off sending
something like this??
I am just angry...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail.
Your message has been queued for delivery. If you would like
your message delivered to my InBox, it will cost you $300.00.
This modest sum is enough to keep unwanted junk e-mail from
flooding my account. This e-mail was sent to you only because
you contacted me by e-mail. Thank you for your understanding.
If you choose not to pay, I completely understand, and I
respect your decision.
If your message is important, and you choose to pay $300.00
to allow your e-mail through, the message will be
automatically sent once PayPal informs me that the payment
has been made. There is no need to send the message again.
You can pay me securely by PayPal with Visa, Mastercard,
Discover or American Express. If you do not have a PayPal
account, you can sign up for one at no cost.
Sign up for PayPal
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe Service grows in memory size.
Did the reboots just start since you installed W2KSP4? I've seen that in a couple of articles and the only thing people said they did to fix it was to uninstall SP4. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe Service grows in memory size. I have been experiencing a weird problem over the last couple of weeks. The Information Store Service grows at a pretty decent pace and eventually gets over a Gig in size. I have never seen this happen on my server before. The problem is that once it gets so big the whole server shuts down and reboots. Any ideas? Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange 2000 SP3 with Rollup Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Local RPC is RPC on the local machine. Unless the local machine is an Exchange server, there's probably no advantage to it being listed first. On 07/21/03 16:05, Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So we should set TCP/IP first? What is Local RPC, is that some sort of netbios/netbeui protocol? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Q163576 -- From: Warren Cundy Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem No can you direct me where to look? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Have you checked the RPC Binding Order entry in the registry? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Can they ping the FQDN? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=e nglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
No need to 'bump' someone with automatic replies to the internet enabled,
not when there are so many other interesting avenues one might explore.
On 07/21/03 17:16, Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know we discussed this at length before - I posted to the NT/2000
list, and got this back (first time). To say that I am not happy that
someone on the list is sending these to people on the lists is an
understatement.
Can we not bump this user? Where do they get off sending something like
this??
I am just angry...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail. Your
message has been queued for delivery. If you would like your message
delivered to my InBox, it will cost you $300.00.
This modest sum is enough to keep unwanted junk e-mail from flooding my
account. This e-mail was sent to you only because you contacted me by
e-mail. Thank you for your understanding.
If you choose not to pay, I completely understand, and I respect your
decision.
If your message is important, and you choose to pay $300.00 to allow
your e-mail through, the message will be automatically sent once PayPal
informs me that the payment has been made. There is no need to send the
message again.
You can pay me securely by PayPal with Visa, Mastercard, Discover or
American Express. If you do not have a PayPal account, you can sign up
for one at no cost.
Sign up for PayPal
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=e
nglish
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
It's been a while since I've seen a good mail loop. :)
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
No need to 'bump' someone with automatic replies to the internet enabled,
not when there are so many other interesting avenues one might explore.
On 07/21/03 17:16, Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know we discussed this at length before - I posted to the NT/2000
list, and got this back (first time). To say that I am not happy that
someone on the list is sending these to people on the lists is an
understatement.
Can we not bump this user? Where do they get off sending something like
this??
I am just angry...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail. Your
message has been queued for delivery. If you would like your message
delivered to my InBox, it will cost you $300.00.
This modest sum is enough to keep unwanted junk e-mail from flooding my
account. This e-mail was sent to you only because you contacted me by
e-mail. Thank you for your understanding.
If you choose not to pay, I completely understand, and I respect your
decision.
If your message is important, and you choose to pay $300.00 to allow
your e-mail through, the message will be automatically sent once PayPal
informs me that the payment has been made. There is no need to send the
message again.
You can pay me securely by PayPal with Visa, Mastercard, Discover or
American Express. If you do not have a PayPal account, you can sign up
for one at no cost.
Sign up for PayPal
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=e
nglish
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized
Hi Nate, Thanks for replay I can send e-mail from hotmail.com But have problem send from my organization. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized
Maybe she changed her hair color. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized Your system does not recognize - 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' - as a legitimate address. Try typing it out in the format - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or whatever the correct SMTP address for Galina is. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Niko Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized Hi all, We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT 4.0 SP6a box. All internet email incoming and outgoing works fine except to one site. This company can send us email, but if we reply or send email we get an immediate NDR. The NDR says that The recipient name is not recognized ääåãòä ùìê ìà äâéòä ìçì÷ îäethîòethéí äîéåòãéí àå ìëåìí. ethåùà:thornCupboard (room 004) ethùìçä: thorn14-Jul-03 10:46 AM îñéøú ääåãòä ìethîòethéí äáàéí ìà äöìéçä: 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' á- 14-Jul-03 10:46 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Fine Care LTD;l=SERVER-030714084550Z-6 KB article Q133403 says that this means that the MTA doesn't recognize the address type as a deliverable type. But, the other location is using SMTP, Exchange 5.5 as well. My address Space for the IMS connector has SMTP entered as the only address property. I can connect to domain from telnet domainname.com 25 use mail from: and rcpt to: command I get error message Client host rejected.Acess denied Any one has a clue of the solution? Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated Thanks Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account
Tell the person who told you such a thing that he's an idiot. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Rohl Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account With Exchange 2000 all Exchange services start up using the local system account. Should this be changed to use a domain account instead? I was told that this was a recomended Best Practice by Microsoft. Is this true? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch/SP3 with Win2k/SP4
I didn't know that Google had a service pack. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch/SP3 with Win2k/SP4 I haven't seen much with problems pertaining to installing Win2k SP4 on Google. Anything in particular that I should be aware of or be looking for before I take the plunge? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
