Primary Group Issue
Hi all, I am having issues when trying to set a users primary group in active directory. As soon as I do, the user is removed from the distribution list of that primary group. Exchange 2000 is on SP3. What setting or option am I missing? Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
After unhooking Antigen did you wait to see if the problem reoccurred? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Haines Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Odd Undeliverable report
This turned out to be the case. I was setup to get NDRs for the existing email system, which was using NBR-LANSERVER.nbroffice.org as the SMTP server. I think that when I got the NDR, Exchange (or Outlook?) saw that it was an NDR, addressed to me, and so formatted it with that assumption. I checked this by sending a known bad email, the NDR looked the same. Is this an Exchange or an Outlook feature? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Odd Undeliverable report Are you the postmaster for the Exchange system, and have you requested copies of NDRs? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Odd Undeliverable report Every now and then, when someone in my organization sends an email, I get something like the following error message. It's from the System Administrator (no info in properties). The system is acting as the SMTP server for the non Exchange systems. The odd part is, I'm the only one that running Outlook/Exchange. Everyone else is on a POP3 system (Eudora Worldmail). Why is Exchange sending this error to me? I didn't send the email, so any errors should go to the sender, correct? Thanks, Erick Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: XXX Sent: 7/22/2003 2:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/22/2003 2:33 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Odd Undeliverable report
Are you the postmaster for the Exchange system, and have you requested copies of NDRs? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Odd Undeliverable report Every now and then, when someone in my organization sends an email, I get something like the following error message. It's from the System Administrator (no info in properties). The system is acting as the SMTP server for the non Exchange systems. The odd part is, I'm the only one that running Outlook/Exchange. Everyone else is on a POP3 system (Eudora Worldmail). Why is Exchange sending this error to me? I didn't send the email, so any errors should go to the sender, correct? Thanks, Erick Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: XXX Sent: 7/22/2003 2:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/22/2003 2:33 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Odd Undeliverable report
Every now and then, when someone in my organization sends an email, I get something like the following error message. It's from the System Administrator (no info in properties). The system is acting as the SMTP server for the non Exchange systems. The odd part is, I'm the only one that running Outlook/Exchange. Everyone else is on a POP3 system (Eudora Worldmail). Why is Exchange sending this error to me? I didn't send the email, so any errors should go to the sender, correct? Thanks, Erick Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: XXX Sent: 7/22/2003 2:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/22/2003 2:33 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
Don't forget about eseutil DB repair tool in the advent you hav a corruption. The repair functions processes at a given rate (can't remember how fast) so a full repair on a large database could run for half a day or more depending on the size. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posti
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
Then you need to add the Outlook Address Book as a service. Can't remember how you add it in 2000 (been on Outlook XP and OL11 for a couple years now), but once you add the Outlook Address Book (NOT Personal Address Book), then you can go to the properties of Contacts, and click the box to Show as Address List. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:59 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? This option is grayed out for some reason. Any reason why it would be? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says "Show this folder as an address book" -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
I don't argue that there should be size limits on mailboxes. I personally think they're silly (with caveats, of course). Missy - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-
Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al)
Standard best practice is to limit the IS to about 45GB in size, and add additional Exchange servers once you're near that limit. This is due to the amount of time it will take to recover a larger IS. I don't know that MS has any documentation on this. If you'd like, I'm certain my employer would be happy to send out a consultant to write this up for you. Missy - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:11 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
That was the problem. It works now. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? Make sure you have the "Outlook address book" service installed. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? This option is grayed out for some reason. Any reason why it would be? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says "Show this folder as an address book" -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
For me I argued potential restore time. then there's the time it takes to back it all up... Also for my users over my WAN links..the smaller their mailboxes the faster it generates for them on their machines. then if I want to get crazy and use say exmerge as a kind'a of BLB .makes it more feasible then I would say maybe there's the load on the disk array...maybe... and so on bill -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
Storage capacity, backup storage capacity, backup time & window, recovery time & window. Those things are not all independent items, but work together. Or not, if you let your mailboxes grow to (Humungous)gb sizes. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft. com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http:/
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or sen
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe:
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
If you have Contacts in the Contacts folder but they are not accessible when you click on the To button, check these settings: Make sure the Contact folder is enabled as an email address book. Right click the Contacts folder, choose Properties then Outlook Address Book. Is the box to enable as email address book is checked? If this is grayed out... Go to Tools | Email Accounts, choose View or change existing directories or address book. Is the Outlook Address Book present? If it isn't listed, add it and close and restart Outlook. If it is listed, then remove it and close then restart Outlook and repeat these steps to add it. -Original Message- This option is grayed out for some reason. Any reason why it would be? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says "Show this folder as an address book" -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
Make sure you have the "Outlook address book" service installed. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? This option is grayed out for some reason. Any reason why it would be? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says "Show this folder as an address book" -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al)
Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS" We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a "Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
Click on your address book, then tools, options, down at the bottom, add your local contact folder. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? This option is grayed out for some reason. Any reason why it would be? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says "Show this folder as an address book" -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
This option is grayed out for some reason. Any reason why it would be? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says "Show this folder as an address book" -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says "Show this folder as an address book" -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the "To" button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the "show names from" combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al)
Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Track missing email
Step 1: get user name name and user id Step 2: ...delete... Step 3: http://www.theregister.co.uk/ BOFH Archive Step 4: get cup of coffee Step 5: read entire archive Seriously, Or you can check his PDA settings or his PST files. (pst=bad) Check to see if view filters are turned on or if he has fiddled with archive settings. There is probably something I am missing but it is a start. rachel -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Track missing email Hi, I am lost and need your advise. We have two users and a PF that is subscribed to a list. One user would periodically report that he does not receive an email. I set up the PF just so he can easily compare with his own. I have enabled message tracking, but not sure where the problem sits at the moment. And for troubleshooting sake, I also have requested him to turn off all his rules. Where can I start to identify the problem? Our environement is E2K-SP3 and W2K-SP4 and post SP4, no post SP3 roll-up for E2K. Thanks in advance. ~justin PS... How do I get a complete message header, especially those that is posted to the Public Folder? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al)
MS Exchange 5.5 Standard edition limit is 16GB. MS Exchange 5.5 Enterprise edition limit is only limited by the amount of hard drive space you have. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird logon issue with OWA
> > From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You have to add > the URL for > > your OWA box to the "local intranet" site within Internet > Explore on > > the client machine in order for it to pass the login info. > Is there a way I can do this for *all* client machines in the domain, by using a policy object or something ? Sort of new to this stuff, so if anyone can tell me how its done, I'll be glad. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al)
Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Communications failure
You have a 100 MB limit on the amount of data that can reside in your Yahoo! mailbox, but the limit per e-mail message is still 2.5 mb, if I remember correctly. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Communications failure Exchange Server 5.5 SP 4 running on NT4.0 box with SP6a Client: Outlook 2000 on Windows 2000 platform I've been trying to send an email with an attachment to a specific user and it keeps bouncing back. The user I'm sending it to says she has no storage allocation limits set on her mailbox. As a test, I tried sending the same email to my YAHOO account but it bounced back as well giving me a 'communications failure' message. The message size is about 3 MB and I have 100 MB limit on my yahoo account. Here is the message I get in the bounce-back mail Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: Resending screenshot Sent: 7/22/2003 1:02 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 7/22/2003 1:04 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=AIIM;l=MYSERVER-030722170208Z-35943 MSEXCH:IMS:AIIM:AIIM.ORG:ACME1 3552 (000B09B6) 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 7/22/2003 1:04 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=AIIM;l=MYSERVER-030722170208Z-35943 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history
RIF Reduction In Force. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:13 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history Subject: Re: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history www.yahoogroups.com seems to have a lot of stuff - AD, W2K, E2K, E2K3, W2K3 lists. - Original Message - From: "Shotton Jolyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:03 PM Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history Ta, Missy. RIF'ed? Anyway I get the idea. I remember the inernet.com takeover - they added some branding and links to other of their sites. Didn't seem that bad at the time. Clearly someone who didn't understand the value of what they had made all sorts of wrong decisions. What a distressing turn of events. Where do people go now instead? I particularly used to use swynk for their SMS coverage and I may soon be getting back into this area. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 July 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routine Maintenance Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the "swynk" in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely. I think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence! The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Communications failure
Exchange Server 5.5 SP 4 running on NT4.0 box with SP6a Client: Outlook 2000 on Windows 2000 platform I've been trying to send an email with an attachment to a specific user and it keeps bouncing back. The user I'm sending it to says she has no storage allocation limits set on her mailbox. As a test, I tried sending the same email to my YAHOO account but it bounced back as well giving me a 'communications failure' message. The message size is about 3 MB and I have 100 MB limit on my yahoo account. Here is the message I get in the bounce-back mail Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: Resending screenshot Sent: 7/22/2003 1:02 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 7/22/2003 1:04 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=AIIM;l=MYSERVER-030722170208Z-35943 MSEXCH:IMS:AIIM:AIIM.ORG:ACME1 3552 (000B09B6) 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 7/22/2003 1:04 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=AIIM;l=MYSERVER-030722170208Z-35943 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error
Sorry, I misunderstood where you were going with this. Getting into OWA is fine. It's the changing the password once in there that I'm having an issue with under Option->Change Password. That's where I'm filling in the info, hitting Submit and it's returning this error... Cheers. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Error I'm saying that you can logon to OWA using your SMTP address. That simple. - Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: RE: OWA Error Not too sure what you mean with regards to Exchange 5.5. I know what you're saying but can this be setup for 5.5? I hadn't read anything that said it could... Thanks -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Error Think "smtp address" instead of UPN and it isn't. - Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM Subject: RE: OWA Error Hi, I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000? Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Error Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account field or use the upn logon. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Error Subject: OWA Error Hi again, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3. Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing... Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history
www.yahoogroups.com seems to have a lot of stuff - AD, W2K, E2K, E2K3, W2K3 lists. - Original Message - From: "Shotton Jolyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:03 PM Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history Ta, Missy. RIF'ed? Anyway I get the idea. I remember the inernet.com takeover - they added some branding and links to other of their sites. Didn't seem that bad at the time. Clearly someone who didn't understand the value of what they had made all sorts of wrong decisions. What a distressing turn of events. Where do people go now instead? I particularly used to use swynk for their SMS coverage and I may soon be getting back into this area. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 July 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routine Maintenance Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the "swynk" in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely. I think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence! The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Error
I'm saying that you can logon to OWA using your SMTP address. That simple. - Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: RE: OWA Error Not too sure what you mean with regards to Exchange 5.5. I know what you're saying but can this be setup for 5.5? I hadn't read anything that said it could... Thanks -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Error Think "smtp address" instead of UPN and it isn't. - Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM Subject: RE: OWA Error Hi, I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000? Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Error Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account field or use the upn logon. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Error Subject: OWA Error Hi again, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3. Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing... Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error
Not too sure what you mean with regards to Exchange 5.5. I know what you're saying but can this be setup for 5.5? I hadn't read anything that said it could... Thanks -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Error Think "smtp address" instead of UPN and it isn't. - Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM Subject: RE: OWA Error Hi, I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000? Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Error Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account field or use the upn logon. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Error Subject: OWA Error Hi again, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3. Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing... Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history
Ta, Missy. RIF'ed? Anyway I get the idea. I remember the inernet.com takeover - they added some branding and links to other of their sites. Didn't seem that bad at the time. Clearly someone who didn't understand the value of what they had made all sorts of wrong decisions. What a distressing turn of events. Where do people go now instead? I particularly used to use swynk for their SMS coverage and I may soon be getting back into this area. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 July 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routine Maintenance Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the "swynk" in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely. I think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence! The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routine Maintenance
Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the "swynk" in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely. I think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence! - Original Message - From: "Shotton Jolyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:36 AM Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance (I've been out of this sort of loop for a while - what happened to SWYNK?) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
"small and obscure" indeed. Thanks! Jeff -Original Message- From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Open ESM and browse to the SMTP VS of the server that receives inbound SMTP (or the SMTP VS to which you want the filter to be applied to) and open the properties of the SMTP VS. On the General Tab, next to the "IP address:" field there is an Advanced button. Click that and then select the network interface you want to apply the filter to (if there is no specific IP defined then you will see "All Unassigned"). Select that and click Edit and presto..you have a small and obscure check box that says "Apply Filter". Enjoy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hague, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side I dont see how to enable or disable the filter on the SMTP virtual server - Exch2K, SP3. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Be sure to enable the filter on the SMTP virtual server Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johansson Patrick Posted At: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Open exchange system manager, open global settings and right click on message delivery and choose properties. You should see a tab called filtering and you can then add the sender there. Hth, Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side OPS, sorry. Exchange 2000 Server + SP3 The clients are using Outlook 2000 and XP. -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side What version of exchange are you using? -Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?ente
Track missing email
Hi, I am lost and need your advise. We have two users and a PF that is subscribed to a list. One user would periodically report that he does not receive an email. I set up the PF just so he can easily compare with his own. I have enabled message tracking, but not sure where the problem sits at the moment. And for troubleshooting sake, I also have requested him to turn off all his rules. Where can I start to identify the problem? Our environement is E2K-SP3 and W2K-SP4 and post SP4, no post SP3 roll-up for E2K. Thanks in advance. ~justin PS... How do I get a complete message header, especially those that is posted to the Public Folder? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
Open ESM and browse to the SMTP VS of the server that receives inbound SMTP (or the SMTP VS to which you want the filter to be applied to) and open the properties of the SMTP VS. On the General Tab, next to the "IP address:" field there is an Advanced button. Click that and then select the network interface you want to apply the filter to (if there is no specific IP defined then you will see "All Unassigned"). Select that and click Edit and presto..you have a small and obscure check box that says "Apply Filter". Enjoy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hague, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side I dont see how to enable or disable the filter on the SMTP virtual server - Exch2K, SP3. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Be sure to enable the filter on the SMTP virtual server Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johansson Patrick Posted At: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Open exchange system manager, open global settings and right click on message delivery and choose properties. You should see a tab called filtering and you can then add the sender there. Hth, Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side OPS, sorry. Exchange 2000 Server + SP3 The clients are using Outlook 2000 and XP. -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side What version of exchange are you using? -Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
I'm having a little trouble finding this so if you could post it I'd be grateful. (I've been out of this sort of loop for a while - what happened to SWYNK?) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 July 2003 16:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance There was an excellent explanation by Ed Woodrick on the topic of compacting the Exchange store back on March 15, 2002 if you'd like to look in the archives. Unless asked for, I won't repost it. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
There was an excellent explanation by Ed Woodrick on the topic of compacting the Exchange store back on March 15, 2002 if you'd like to look in the archives. Unless asked for, I won't repost it. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Not that I have seen. From what I know MS Exchange just treats this as space to stuff more stuff into. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Does large amount of white space increases chances of corruption? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:39 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Well we have about 20GB of white space right now. I unfortunately > have to waste the time to do one. > > Alex > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I have had 2GB+ of whitespace > > But I still woudn't waste time on doing an offline defrag > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just > you should do them? > > The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was going to > do a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services > anyway. Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes > an unnecessary interruption in uptime. > > As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing > one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are within > your backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that > offline defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount > of deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of > whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you > are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall > while you purchase the Enterprise edition. > > > Ben Winzenz > Network Engineer > Gardner & White > (317) 581-1580 ext 418 > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: Routine Maintenance > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > > You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. > They take a long time. > > > -Original Message- > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > me Im no guru like the other people here... > so I let the server do it > Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check > Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note > NO > BLB!!) > my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check > done... > > My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It > run's run's and run's > > OK once it a great while I reboot it > some times I look at my log's..some times I dont > > If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a > while...or so... > > I try not to fix it if it aint broke... > now where is that hammer.. > > bill > > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Routine Maintenance > > > Hello All. > > Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what > kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. > > Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? > > Exchange 5.5 sp4 > Windows 2000 Advanced Server > Outlook 2000/XP clients > > Thanks! > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =& > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_fa
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
I have a backup for an emergency just not one with recent enough information to just do a restore to attempt to resolve this particular issue. My full backups are completing every night successfully as well and are not overlapping with maintenance. maintenance runs every morning at 4 am thanks!! -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe pegging the processor I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
Not that I have seen. From what I know MS Exchange just treats this as space to stuff more stuff into. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Does large amount of white space increases chances of corruption? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:39 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Well we have about 20GB of white space right now. I unfortunately have > to waste the time to do one. > > Alex > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I have had 2GB+ of whitespace > > But I still woudn't waste time on doing an offline defrag > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just > you should do them? > > The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was going to do > a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services anyway. > Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes an > unnecessary interruption in uptime. > > As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing > one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are within your > backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that offline > defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount of > deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of > whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you > are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall > while you purchase the Enterprise edition. > > > Ben Winzenz > Network Engineer > Gardner & White > (317) 581-1580 ext 418 > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: Routine Maintenance > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > > You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. > They take a long time. > > > -Original Message- > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > me Im no guru like the other people here... > so I let the server do it > Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check > Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO > BLB!!) > my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check > done... > > My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It > run's run's and run's > > OK once it a great while I reboot it > some times I look at my log's..some times I dont > > If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a > while...or so... > > I try not to fix it if it aint broke... > now where is that hammer.. > > bill > > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Routine Maintenance > > > Hello All. > > Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what > kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. > > Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? > > Exchange 5.5 sp4 > Windows 2000 Advanced Server > Outlook 2000/XP clients > > Thanks! > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-
RE: Routine Maintenance
Why would it? White space is simply put, space that has been allocated for use by the database, but is currently not being used. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:53 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Routine Maintenance Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Does large amount of white space increases chances of corruption? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Well we have about 20GB of white space right now. I unfortunately have to waste the time to do one. Alex -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have had 2GB+ of whitespace But I still woudn't waste time on doing an offline defrag -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just you should do them? The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was going to do a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services anyway. Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes an unnecessary interruption in uptime. As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are within your backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that offline defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount of deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall while you purchase the Enterprise edition. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Routine Maintenance Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
RE: Routine Maintenance
Um, no. Why would it? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:53 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > > Does large amount of white space increases chances of corruption? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:39 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Well we have about 20GB of white space right now. I > unfortunately have > to waste the time to do one. > > Alex > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I have had 2GB+ of whitespace > > But I still woudn't waste time on doing an offline defrag > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just > you should do them? > > The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was > going to do > a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services anyway. > Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes an > unnecessary interruption in uptime. > > As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing > one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are > within your > backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that offline > defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount of > deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of > whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you > are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall > while you purchase the Enterprise edition. > > > Ben Winzenz > Network Engineer > Gardner & White > (317) 581-1580 ext 418 > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: Routine Maintenance > Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance > > > You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. > They take a long time. > > > -Original Message- > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > me Im no guru like the other people here... > so I let the server do it > Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check > Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check > done (note NO > BLB!!) > my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check > done... > > My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It > run's run's and run's > > OK once it a great while I reboot it > some times I look at my log's..some times I dont > > If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a > while...or so... > > I try not to fix it if it aint broke... > now where is that hammer.. > > bill > > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Routine Maintenance > > > Hello All. > > Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what > kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. > > Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? > > Exchange 5.5 sp4 > Windows 2000 Advanced Server > Outlook 2000/XP clients > > Thanks! > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_
RE: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account
Are you enemies with that person? -Original Message- From: Randy Rohl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Local System Acount vs. Domain Account With Exchange 2000 all Exchange services start up using the local system account. Should this be changed to use a domain account instead? I was told that this was a recomended "Best Practice" by Microsoft. Is this true? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
Does large amount of white space increases chances of corruption? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Well we have about 20GB of white space right now. I unfortunately have to waste the time to do one. Alex -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have had 2GB+ of whitespace But I still woudn't waste time on doing an offline defrag -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just you should do them? The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was going to do a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services anyway. Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes an unnecessary interruption in uptime. As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are within your backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that offline defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount of deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall while you purchase the Enterprise edition. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Routine Maintenance Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.
Re: Store.exe pegging the processor
I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Error
Think "smtp address" instead of UPN and it isn't. - Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM Subject: RE: OWA Error Hi, I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000? Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Error Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account field or use the upn logon. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Error Subject: OWA Error Hi again, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3. Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing... Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error
Hi, I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000? Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Error Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account field or use the upn logon. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Error Subject: OWA Error Hi again, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3. Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing... Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Store.exe pegging the processor
Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
I dont see how to enable or disable the filter on the SMTP virtual server - Exch2K, SP3. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Be sure to enable the filter on the SMTP virtual server Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johansson Patrick Posted At: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Open exchange system manager, open global settings and right click on message delivery and choose properties. You should see a tab called filtering and you can then add the sender there. Hth, Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side OPS, sorry. Exchange 2000 Server + SP3 The clients are using Outlook 2000 and XP. -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side What version of exchange are you using? -Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
Be sure to enable the filter on the SMTP virtual server Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johansson Patrick Posted At: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Open exchange system manager, open global settings and right click on message delivery and choose properties. You should see a tab called filtering and you can then add the sender there. Hth, Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side OPS, sorry. Exchange 2000 Server + SP3 The clients are using Outlook 2000 and XP. -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side What version of exchange are you using? -Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Maintenance
Well we have about 20GB of white space right now. I unfortunately have to waste the time to do one. Alex -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have had 2GB+ of whitespace But I still woudn't waste time on doing an offline defrag -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance Why should you do offline backups? What's the reasoning besides just you should do them? The only time that I would do an offline backup is if I was going to do a major upgrade that required stopping the Exchange services anyway. Other than that, doing an offline backup is silly. It causes an unnecessary interruption in uptime. As for offline defrag, I've never done one, don't ever plan on doing one. As long as you've got plenty of storage space, and are within your backup window, it's just not worth it. The only times that offline defrags are of any value are if you've made a massive amount of deletions and want to reclaim the white space (largest amount of whitespace I remember hearing about was 90gb of whitespace) or if you are close to the 16gb limit in the Standard edition and need to stall while you purchase the Enterprise edition. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Routine Maintenance Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
Open exchange system manager, open global settings and right click on message delivery and choose properties. You should see a tab called filtering and you can then add the sender there. Hth, Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side OPS, sorry. Exchange 2000 Server + SP3 The clients are using Outlook 2000 and XP. -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side What version of exchange are you using? -Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
OPS, sorry. Exchange 2000 Server + SP3 The clients are using Outlook 2000 and XP. -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side What version of exchange are you using? -Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
What version of exchange are you using? -Patrick -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOWTO: Block messages at server-side
Hi all I would like to block messages from someone at server-side (Exchange). I tried to use an Outlook Rule to permanently delete messages from someone, but this kind of rule is a client-only rule. Is there another way I can do this? I just want to stop receiving annoying messages from someone without receiving them in Outlook. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error
Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account field or use the upn logon. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Error Subject: OWA Error Hi again, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3. Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing... Cheers, Tony Tony Woods MCSE, CNA eMail/Network Administrator National Money Mart (250) 519-1302 ext 245 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
