RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
The real reason is that 2003 AD Schema is very different than 2000, so this should be the upgrade path. Upgrade Windows 2000 to 2003, then upgrade E2K to E3K, but I would be scared to do this. Eric -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 What? I thought it was the other way around? OK, for those in the know, please clear this up. You upgrade Exchange first, then OS? Or OS first, then Exchange? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 I do not believe you can install Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003. Windows 2003 runs IIS 6.0, which Exchange 2000 does not support. On the other hand Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0. So the proper upgrade path is upgrade Exchange 2000 first and then upgrade the OS to Windows 2003. Thanks, Steve Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Finding full mailboxes.
Meant to add, save the window contents to a file after sorting, and there's your report. Somewhat of a manual process, and not fancy, but doesn't cost anything and requires no additional software. Pull the file into Excel or Access for more sort options. Maybe not as automated of a process as you are looking for, but again, cheap. -Original Message- From: Russ Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Finding full mailboxes. Add Storage Limits to the System Manager view and sort. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Finding full mailboxes. Does anyone know of a way to query the exchange server or get some kind of report of mailboxes that are full or approaching full? Aside from going into system manager and manually viewing the mailbox sizes? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-464-2381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
Header information. Obviously it wouldn't be as good as filtering on the body, but woouldn't it still be able to read the header? Jason -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution What would this spam filter filter on if it didn't download the message to inspect it? From: Jason Clishe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:58:12 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Looking for POP3 Spam solution I know the spam topic gets beat to death here, but I've got an executive request here. What I need is a product that will scan and delete messages on a POP3 server *without downloading them*. Ideally, this would be a product that runs as a standalone service somewhere, and has a configurable blacklist. Anything like this out there? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
I don't know...you could always try and talk your boss into sending you to Munich for a week to enjoy OktoberFest! Or you could come to Leavenworth, WA for the same thing, albeit on a much smaller scale. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue So now what are we to do for a week in October? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue For all of you that were not satisified with the Exchange content at TechEd 2003, this looks like a pretty good alternative and a pretty good replacement for MEC: http://www.winconnections.com/exc/ It has sessions with the following industry heavyweights: Tony Redmond Sue Mosher Jim McBee Paul Robichaux Mark Minasi Jan De Clercq Mark Russinovich Kevin McCuistion - Director, MS Exchange Looks like it has great content for both Exchange 2000/2003 as well as a lot of good Win2k3 stuff!! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact opposite. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. Oh well. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
nah.. I think I'll submit a request to attend the winconnections event in Orlando. I mean, c'mon.. mosher, minasi, mcbee, russinovich, redmond..?!? They have MECC beat in that regard. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue I don't know...you could always try and talk your boss into sending you to Munich for a week to enjoy OktoberFest! Or you could come to Leavenworth, WA for the same thing, albeit on a much smaller scale. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue So now what are we to do for a week in October? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue For all of you that were not satisified with the Exchange content at TechEd 2003, this looks like a pretty good alternative and a pretty good replacement for MEC: http://www.winconnections.com/exc/ It has sessions with the following industry heavyweights: Tony Redmond Sue Mosher Jim McBee Paul Robichaux Mark Minasi Jan De Clercq Mark Russinovich Kevin McCuistion - Director, MS Exchange Looks like it has great content for both Exchange 2000/2003 as well as a lot of good Win2k3 stuff!! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact opposite. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. Oh well. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: New Entourage
I've heard that too, but I didn't find an E2K only statement anywhere in the readme or the mactopia website, and Entourage does, more or less, work if you plug in the info for a 5.5 server. However, the end result is just a regular IMAP connection. -Peter -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage Its designed for E2K or higher -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage I got the same results you did, using Entourage with an Exchange 5.5 server. Does it maybe work better with 2000? -Peter -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Entourage I myself don't like the Entourage update for Office X. I don't get anything more than I did with IMAP it seems. Any public folders that are set to be of Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly. Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP? -Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com - Original Message - From: Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 AM Subject: RE: New Entourage I'm thinking about trying out citrix -Original Message- From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy, and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on the product that generates some revenue. As far as Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what you'd expect from a point upgrade. -Peter -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage I don't doubt it. That makes perfect business sense. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for the Mac because OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a legitimate chance of displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop. It meets the requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc). Therefore, the only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its Microsoft's only way to stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage This is more venting than any serious question: What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1) What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded from scratch) You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server? Why did they get rid of the Outlook product? Why make an organization with Macs go through so many hoops? It's not like they have to code from scratch. It makes no sense. The whole idea is to make the products across both platforms the same or mostly the same. They didn't take Word or Excel, retool it, take out some important features and call it something else, did they? Keerist!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Entourage Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange aware, you mean 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and and automatic configuration of address book and other account settings to support Exchange qualifies, then maybe. From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400 To: Exchange
RE: AV/Spam scanning services
There are some discussions of a few of them in the archives. Personally, I'm not a fan of outsourced anti-spam, but that's in part because we're a heavily email dependent company and so we can justify the expense of in house measures to combat those issues. As a side note - outsourced antivirus doesn't save money - you still need to have an inhouse AV product for email, because scanning at the gateway isn't enough. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV/Spam scanning services We are looking at services from Message Labs, Postini, Frontbridge, and Appriver. Anybody have any experience with these services in general or any one of them in paticular? I've been looking for any write ups, reviews, or comparisons but havent had much luck. Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Header Question
Hello Group, I have a question about the Internet headers of an Email. If one looks at this Spam Email Header - Received: from 169.139.15.251 (210.91.16.8 [210.91.16.8]) by mail.wpbpl.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id PYC9TG9D; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:22:09 -0400 Received: from [157.124.218.229] by 169.139.15.251 with SMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:21:11 +0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Beckie Yaung [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Beckie Yaung [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: my pictures are ready now Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:21:11 +0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=F11140.F0BB5D4 X-Priority: 1 --F11140.F0BB5D4 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --F11140.F0BB5D4-- -- Would the spam be coming from the 210.91.16.8, 169.139.15.251, or the 157.124.218.229 IP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCC emails
Thanks. Irf. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: BCC emails MSDN and the Exchange SDK are places to start if you'd like to do it yourself. Sure there are plenty of developers out there who'd be happy to take on such a project. From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:15:12 +0500 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BCC emails Thanks Chris, can you tell me where can I get help/ procedure to do this. Or is there a easy way of doing it. Thanks Regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:52 AM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: BCC emails Sure, you'll just need to write a categorizer event sink. Course it will prevent you from receiving messages just like this one. Enjoy. From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:41 +0500 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCC emails Dear List, Is there a way to block the bcc mails on server level or is there any software any procedure to do that. Love u all, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange rejects valid messages
My exchange server 5.5 has just started rejecting messages sent to me with and NDR of 552. I have no limits on my mailbox or on the system default. But anytime a messages over 1meg is sent it sends an NDR back to the sender with 552 as the reason. Anyone have any ideas on this? Thanks, DL _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
I didn't think the backup API in Exchange was capable of that speed, regardless of hardware. Jason -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 You're not going to get a gig a minute on BLB's regardless of the HW. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange server). I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. Raj -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
Re: Monitoring DL Usage
yaa.. and check out www.e-nspect.com too if we are going to be dropping names. mike - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:08 PM Subject: Re: Monitoring DL Usage There are 3rd party tools as well. From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:03:26 -0700 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Monitoring DL Usage Ya, I thought about that one but I thought there might be something out there that people use for reporting and could recommend -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitoring DL Usage Add yourself to all of the DLs and see how often you get mail. From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:39:43 -0700 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Monitoring DL Usage Hello, I would like to monitor the use of our many DL's to see if they're even being used. Does anyone have any recommendations on how to go about this? A search of KB's didn't turn up anything but I might not have used the right query syntax. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Entourage
Configuring an Outlook for the Mac to connect across subnets? I need that ongoing pain like I need another hole in my head. It's not hard, just a hosts file or DNS entry then it workshow is this so different from windows? Why did they get rid of the Outlook product? Hopefully because they realized it sucked complete ass. Entourage was a better product at 1.0 than Outlook for the mac had ever been. Outlook 2001 would be perfectly adequate if they fixed the HTML rendering, made task requests work and sorted a few other flaws that escape me. It's not exactly a major re-write, just a service pack. Even without these fixes OL2001 is workable, we have 200 mac users who are getting on with their jobs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO Question
I deliberately chose not to comment on that suggestion. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO Question I know I can use PFINFO and PFADMIN, I am asking if you agree with the Karen's solution and if not is there any automated ways to get rid of the invalid DNs? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO Question You can use PFINFO and PFADMIN to do this, yes. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO Question Does anyone else agree or disagree? -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO Question Just use ds/is consistency adj in 5.5 and choose to fix all inconsistencies. I would select all but the reset the home server... option, but others may not agree with that. That way you'll get unknown users and unknown accounts removed from the mailbox permissions as well. -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO Question Has anyone ever used PFINFO and PFADMT.txt to remove invalid DNs from Public Folders? I would like to write a macro to remove the DNs from the PFAdmin file and was wondering if anyone has ever done this. I have to clean up our Exchange 5.5 environment in preparation for Exchange 2000 but we have over 2 Public Folders. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Entourage
That would be Nazis without the apostrophe. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Assistant Grammar Nazi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Entourage [1] I hate grammar Nazi's. This is email, not English class. G37 0V3R 17!! [2] I did RTFM. I guess I just didn't get to the part about Public Folders not showing up correctly. I figured since I was browsing through the recent posts, I would just ask a simple question and see what others results were before I went home to try and figure it out. I installed it last night, set up the account and looked at the public folders. About 10 minutes of time spent so far. As far as you being too important, I wasn't referring to the free/busy server issue, I was referring to this: [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with cooler Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than Entourage, which at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs. If you don't really care, why even reply? [3] If everyone RTFM from front to back before they even installed the app, these lists would be little more than haiku Fridays. I think you need to get off your high horse. If your only worth while response is going to be RTFM, then why bother sending an email? -Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:32 PM Subject: Re: New Entourage It's you're not your. And don't blame me for your inability to RTFM. This is indeed a peer support newsgroup; if you don't like my responses feel free to add me to your killfile. I couldn't care less. Indicating I don't have time to go troubleshoot free/busy issues on my machine is hardly an attempt to blow off about how important I am. I was simply pointing out the only unexpected issue I've seen with the Exchange update for Entourage. The issue you describe seems to be expected behavior based on the help files, but I guess you're too important to read those and need the rest of us to do your work for you. From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:08:13 -0500 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New Entourage Well your a happy guy. Thanks for the great answer there. For a minute I thought this a group to help each other out, not blow off about how important we are. Since I am not at home and not near a Mac with Entourage installed, I cant really read the help file right now. I figured if you didn't see the same issue I would dig further, if you didn't see the same issue, I wouldn't worry about it right now. I would figure the appropriate response would be: 1. I don't have any public folders of calendar or contact type so I cant test it OR 2. Yes/No Since you were so helpful, I wont comment on my status of the free/busy server thing either since I have cooler things to play as well. =) -Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: Re: New Entourage Do I see Have you read the help files yet? The client is working as I would expect it to work for me at the moment based on my reading of the help files. With the exception of the free/busy server which I haven't had time to look into.[1] [1] Since Macs aren't supported on my network, it has pretty low priority.[2] [2] Plus it's my Mac, which puts it even lower on the priority list.[3] [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with cooler Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than Entourage, which at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs. From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:24:45 -0500 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New Entourage Do you see the same issues of Calendar or Contact type public folders looking like IMAP folders and not actual contacts or calendar entries? -Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:05 PM Subject: Re: New Entourage It works just fine in E2K. The Entourage help files contain quite a bit of information, might try reading those for what the expected functionality is. From: Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:18:53 +0100 To:
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
