RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Well I'd assume you did do the NAVEupdate as you changed the registry, what build of NAV? Mine is 2.18(Build 80). The only reason I suggested RAR was I knew NAV can't read it, so it would allow it through. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I found this (http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180 069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocument&prod=Norton%20AntiViru s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchange&ver=2.x&src=ent&pcode=nav_exchange&dtype=corp &svy=&prev=&miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says it should allow ZIP files through if it's password protected but it didn't. I tried both 1 and 0 for the entry but it still got stopped. I tried rar files, password protected and it got through, no problems. I then tried a non pasword protected rar file and it to got through. How interesting... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from subscribers to lists I post to. Not. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238&mode=thread&tid=111&; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL
I don't think the problem was adding members to a DL, but rather getting the appointment onto the calendars of new members automagically. -Original Message- From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:25 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL The other option is to upgrade to the 2003 family of products (Windows 2003 with AD 2003) and Exchange 2003 and use Query Based Distribution Groups (you can then include all mailboxes and when a new one is created it will automatically be a member). For the organisation I work with the Query based group is the killer reason for moving to Exchange 2003 (plus OWA)... My 0.02 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wade Robinson Sent: 26 August 2003 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Thanks I am going to suggest we add this to the new account creation process or hire developer if it is that important. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 3:03 PM Posted To: Exchange List Server Conversation: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Without some coding? I don't think so. Do you have a new hire workflow? Can this step be added to it? i.e. once the employee has had his/her accounts created, have the CEO's admin add this person to the invitee list, and then send an Update only to changed people. You could import from a Vcal or PST file, but it won't capture any changes made to the original meeting request. > -Original Message- > From: Wade Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL > > > MY CEO has a mandatory monthly meeting that he has assigned to our all > employee distribution list. He is very bitter that each time we get a > new employee the meeting does not automatically show up on their > calendar. Is there any way to have the meeting automatically show up > in the new use calendar? > > thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent & Confidential
http://www.historybuff.com/library/refbarnum.html for the story. w.c may of said it , but he was not the first :-) >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/08/2003 5:28:35 a.m. >>> Actually it was David Hannum, not W.C. Fields and not P.T. Barnum who said it. But who's really keeping track. ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Securing POP3, IMAP4 and HTTP access
In Exchange 5.5 it was easy to disable these across the whole server or by user. In 2000 you basically have to edit each user in AD if you want to restrict access to any protocol or disable the service at the server. I want to turn off POP3 for all but a couple of users. Is there an AD tool or policy I can set, or some other way of achieving this within having to visit each users property page in AD? Thanks Pedro _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent & Confidential
Just need to spoof a from address of a list subscriber and send it to the list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/08/2003 3:56:48 a.m. >>>
We get hundreds of those every day. How did he get on this list? Did he
subscribe?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549 01 56
===
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 16:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
Onuigbo is my new buddy. Always wanted a lawyer friend called Onuigbo
From: "Bob Sadler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:04:26 -0500
WOW! 25 Million Dollars! SIGN ME UP NOW!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Urgent & Confidential
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Mr. Onuigbo Baldwin Gozie, Bank Manager of Diamond Bank, Lagos
Branch. I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for you
Mr. Barry Kelly made a numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve
calendar months, valued at US$25,000,000.00 (Twenty-five Million
Dollars) in my branch. Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to
his forwarding address but got no reply. After a month, we sent a
reminder and finally we discovered from his contract employers, Nigerian
National Petroleum Corporation that Mr. Barry Kelly died from an
automobile accident. On further investigation, I found out that he did
not leave a WILL and all attempts to trace his next of kin were
fruitless. I therefore made further investigation and discovered that
Mr. Barry Kelly did not declare any next of kin in all his official
documents, including his Bank Deposit paperwork. This sum of
US$25,000,000.00 is still sitting in the Bank and the interest is being
rolled over with the principal sum at the end of each year. No one will
come forward to claim it. According to the Nigerian Law, at the
expiration of 6{Six} years, the money will revert to the ownership of
the Nigerian Government if nobody applies to claim the funds
Consequently, my proposal is that I will like you as a foreigner to
stand in as the next of kin to Mr. Barry Kelly so that the fruits of
this old man's labor will not get into the hands of some corrupt
government officials. This is simple;
1) I will like you to provide me immediately with your full names and
address so that the attorney will prepare the necessary documents and
affidavits, which will put you in place as the next of kin.
2) We shall employ the services of two attorneys for drafting and
notarization of the WILL and obtain the necessary documents and letter
of probate/administration in your favor for the transfer.
3) A bank account in any part of the world, which you provide, will then
facilitate the transfer of this money to you as the beneficiary/next of
kin of Mr. Barry Kelly. The money will be paid into your account for us
to share in the ratio of 75% for me and 20% for you then 5% will be set
aside for any expenses that may occur during the transfer process. There
is no risk at all as all the paperwork for this transaction will be done
by the attorney and my position as the Branch Manager guarantees the
successful execution of this transaction. If you are interested, please
reply immediately via the private Tel/Fax numbers above. Upon your
response, which will include your personal Tel/Fax numbers I shall then
provide you with more details and relevant documents that will help you
understand. Please observe utmost confidentiality, and rest assured that
this transaction would be most profitable for both of us because I shall
require your assistance to invest my share in your country. A swift
acknowledgement on the receipt of this mail will be appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Onuigbo Baldwin Gozie Esq.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
RE: Message Filtering
Maybe it's just late but I don't understand how @ew01.com would also block the subdomains of that domain. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Mike, I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com ~Jim P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company block list. Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Jim, Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it. I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I used ew01.com and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have blocked this junk mail? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Roger, I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it: Paul Robichaux's "Managing MS Exchange Server", Chapter 8, pg 294, bottom of the page: @foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain [EMAIL PROTECTED] - reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com So Nate's response was spot on. Jim Blunt E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Hmm - I have no problem with you saying it works that way (haven't been able to try it) but that's not the way I would expect it to work - I would expect it to be more restrictive in how it blocks, so @ivy.com only blocks @ivy.com. That's pretty standard practice in other MTA's I've used over the years, which is why it seems a little out of whack. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Then can you explain why I can enter @fr or @biz and the server blocks > anything that ends with .fr or .biz. Doesn't this qualify as blocking > any domain or subdomain that ends with these? It seems to me that it > does. > > > > > -- > > From: Roger Seielstad > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:34 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject:RE: Message Filtering > > > > Actually, that doesn't support what you're saying. > > > > "To prevent all users in a specific domain from delivering > messages to > > your > > site, type the domain name in the following format: @domainname.com" > > > > > > Ivy.com and mail.ivy.com are two, distinct domains, and > therefore blocking > > @ivy.com should not implicitly block @mail.ivy.com. > > > > I'd be interested to know that it blocks subdomains that it is not > > explicitly told to block, though. That's quite a bug. > > > > Roger > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:14 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > > > > Check out Q245465 for Exchange 5.5. It backs up what I said > > > earlier. I have used this successfully on the Exchange 5.5 setups > > > I > have managed. > > > > > > Nate Couch > > > EDS messaging > > > > -- > > > > From: Roger Seielstad > > > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:14 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject:RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > > > You'd have to block it as 'ivy.net', not '@ivy.net' > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:31 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding of reading through the help file is that > > > if you block > > > > > @ivy.net all of the subdomains are blocked as well. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3
Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all. Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0 SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for each of my organisation users. Any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
I said Mailfrontier not Matador. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from subscribers to lists I post to. Not. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238&mode=thread&tid=111&; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
That's by design, and frankly I think it's a good design. Email is not an acceptable transport medium for software, which seems to be an argument I have with our customer support and development groups on a regular basis. Of course, if you password protect the ZIP, it won't get blocked. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files > > > Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. > > I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger > attachments > using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though > a ZIP file is > not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside > them are getting > quarantined. This is really pissing off my software > developers. Now I know > this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed > attachments but > I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that > it ignores them > (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not > aware of that I > can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to > battle with them > for it but I thought I would ask the group first. > > Cheers, > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Filtering
That was my point as well - but apparently that's the way the functionality works. I'd call that a bug, but as Ex5.5 is close to end of life, I highly doubt its gonna get fixed. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Maybe it's just late but I don't understand how @ew01.com > would also block > the subdomains of that domain. > > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > Mike, > > I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com > > ~Jim > > P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company block list. > Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0) > > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Jim, > > Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it. > > I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I > used ew01.com > and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have > blocked this junk mail? > > Thanks, > > Mike > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Roger, > > I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it: > > Paul Robichaux's "Managing MS Exchange Server", Chapter 8, pg > 294, bottom of > the page: > > @foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com > > So Nate's response was spot on. > > Jim Blunt > E-mail Admin > Network Infrastructure Group > Bechtel Hanford, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Hmm - I have no problem with you saying it works that way > (haven't been able > to try it) but that's not the way I would expect it to work - > I would expect > it to be more restrictive in how it blocks, so @ivy.com only blocks > @ivy.com. > > That's pretty standard practice in other MTA's I've used over > the years, > which is why it seems a little out of whack. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:43 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Then can you explain why I can enter @fr or @biz and the > server blocks > > anything that ends with .fr or .biz. Doesn't this qualify > as blocking > > any domain or subdomain that ends with these? It seems to > me that it > > does. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > From: Roger Seielstad > > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:34 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Actually, that doesn't support what you're saying. > > > > > > "To prevent all users in a specific domain from delivering > > messages to > > > your > > > site, type the domain name in the following format: > @domainname.com" > > > > > > > > > Ivy.com and mail.ivy.com are two, distinct domains, and > > therefore blocking > > > @ivy.com should not implicitly block @mail.ivy.com. > > > > > > I'd be interested to know that it blocks subdomains that > it is not > > > explicitly told to block, though. That's quite a bug. > > > > > > Roger > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:14 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out Q245465 for Exchange 5.5. It backs up what I said > > > > earlier. I have used this successfully on the Exchange > 5.5 setups > > > > I > > have managed. > > > > > > > > Nate Couch > > > > EDS messaging > > > > > -- > > > > > From: Roger Seielstad > > > > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:14 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discuss
FW: Strange OWA behaviour
OK, I found KB article q289869 that solved my situation (after a reboot) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;289869 I wonder what caused this situation? I think it has something to do with DAVEX... -Original Message- From: Rui Silva Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange OWA behaviour Hi all. Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0 SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for each of my organisation users. Any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange OWA behaviour
Sounds like someone has enabled "directory browsing" on the Exch virtual directory. - Original Message - From: "Rui Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:43 AM Subject: Strange OWA behaviour Hi all. Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0 SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for each of my organisation users. Any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 with XP client
We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. Several of our users are receiving the following error message when they log in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. "Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in the middle of something, the information you were working on might be lost. Please tell Microsoft about this problem". The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook with no problems. Has anybody seen this issue? Thanks Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
Using newprof? - Original Message - From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client > We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP > workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. > > Several of our users are receiving the following error message when they log > in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. > > "Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a problem and > needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in the > middle of something, the information you were working on might be lost. > Please tell Microsoft about this problem". > > The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook with no > problems. > > Has anybody seen this issue? > > Thanks > > Robert > > > *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** > This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. > *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Mailfrontier is the name of the company. They have two products, one is Anti-Spam Gateway and the other is Matador. So by saying that you didn't say Matador, I assume you are saying you did say Anti-Spam Gateway. Sorry, I forgot my invisible subtext glasses yesterday, it's much clearer now. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:24 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. I said Mailfrontier not Matador. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from subscribers to lists I post to. Not. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238&mode=thread&tid=111&; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
Ocassionally mail starts backing up in the IMC/IMS (Internet Mail Service) queue. (Exchange 5.5 - SP4 on W2K - SP4) A reboot of the computer clears it. (Restarting the IMC doesn't clear the queue, unless I'm just too impatient.) Our mail goes from Exchange to a McAfee e250 Anti-Virus box, through the router to our ISP. This is an infrequent problem which, I suspect, is possibly a network glitch of some sort which doesn't allow mail to go through so, I guess, Exchange gets confused about what to do with it and just holds it? I'm planning an upgrade to W2K3 and Exchange 20003 so I can live with the problem, but if there is some configuration issue, like in DNS or something, I should fix that before I move forward. Thanks for your help. John Technology Department _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary? Does everybody else use it? Robert -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client Using newprof? - Original Message - From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client > We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP > workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. > > Several of our users are receiving the following error message when they log > in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. > > "Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a problem and > needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in the > middle of something, the information you were working on might be lost. > Please tell Microsoft about this problem". > > The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook with no > problems. > > Has anybody seen this issue? > > Thanks > > Robert > > > *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** > This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. > *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Yes, I did run that and I have the same build. The key in question is AllowEncryptedArchives, correct? I set it to both 1 (it was already set to that) and 0 and the password protected zip file (using WinZip 8) got quarantined (it contained two .vbs files) Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I'd assume you did do the NAVEupdate as you changed the registry, what build of NAV? Mine is 2.18(Build 80). The only reason I suggested RAR was I knew NAV can't read it, so it would allow it through. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I found this (http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180 069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocument&prod=Norton%20AntiViru s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchange&ver=2.x&src=ent&pcode=nav_exchange&dtype=corp &svy=&prev=&miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says it should allow ZIP files through if it's password protected but it didn't. I tried both 1 and 0 for the entry but it still got stopped. I tried rar files, password protected and it got through, no problems. I then tried a non pasword protected rar file and it to got through. How interesting... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
public flders creation problem
HI all, Im unable to create Public folders using ESM. I have installed Exchange server 2000 on Windowds 2000 server with Service pack4. When i tried to create new public folder under public folder tree its not doing anything. Neither reporting error nor showing mew the New folder screen. What could be the problem. I have tried in several ways still im unable to create public folders. Im serching for the solution invarious groups but nobody answered. So can i hope answer from this group atleast. Plz help me thx & regards satish juplli _ Over 6,70,000 brides and grooms. http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?74 Click here to join for free. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Yeah but you did run "Naveupdate" after you set it to "0" right? -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 08:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Yes, I did run that and I have the same build. The key in question is AllowEncryptedArchives, correct? I set it to both 1 (it was already set to that) and 0 and the password protected zip file (using WinZip 8) got quarantined (it contained two .vbs files) Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I'd assume you did do the NAVEupdate as you changed the registry, what build of NAV? Mine is 2.18(Build 80). The only reason I suggested RAR was I knew NAV can't read it, so it would allow it through. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I found this (http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180 069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocument&prod=Norton%20AntiViru s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchange&ver=2.x&src=ent&pcode=nav_exchange&dtype=corp &svy=&prev=&miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says it should allow ZIP files through if it's password protected but it didn't. I tried both 1 and 0 for the entry but it still got stopped. I tried rar files, password protected and it got through, no problems. I then tried a non pasword protected rar file and it to got through. How interesting... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
No and no. - Original Message - From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client > We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary? > Does everybody else use it? > > Robert > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client > > > Using newprof? > > - Original Message - > From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM > Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client > > > > We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP > > workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. > > > > Several of our users are receiving the following error message when they > log > > in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. > > > > "Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a problem > and > > needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in the > > middle of something, the information you were working on might be lost. > > Please tell Microsoft about this problem". > > > > The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook with no > > problems. > > > > Has anybody seen this issue? > > > > Thanks > > > > Robert > > > > > > *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** > > This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail > message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and > may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is > intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). > If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in > reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in > error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. > > *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
Sorry, is mail backing up in the outbound queue or in the inbound queue? -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:29 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? Subject: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? Ocassionally mail starts backing up in the IMC/IMS (Internet Mail Service) queue. (Exchange 5.5 - SP4 on W2K - SP4) A reboot of the computer clears it. (Restarting the IMC doesn't clear the queue, unless I'm just too impatient.) Our mail goes from Exchange to a McAfee e250 Anti-Virus box, through the router to our ISP. This is an infrequent problem which, I suspect, is possibly a network glitch of some sort which doesn't allow mail to go through so, I guess, Exchange gets confused about what to do with it and just holds it? I'm planning an upgrade to W2K3 and Exchange 20003 so I can live with the problem, but if there is some configuration issue, like in DNS or something, I should fix that before I move forward. Thanks for your help. John Technology Department _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to retreive client permission on public folder
Greetings, Hi i am running a Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on a W2K machine. I would like to know whether is there any tools/scripts that i can use to auto retreive client permission on the many public folder that i have in my exchange server. It will be quite an hassle to retreive these client permission one by one in each of the public folder manaully. Appreciate any help. Thanks Alan Tan Senior System Consultant Nomura Research Institute 6 Battery Road #36-01 Singapore 049909 (o) +65 6420 1946 (f) +65 6420 1989 (m) 96710270 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to retreive client permission on public folder
Pfinfo and pfadmin from BORK will give you the information you are looking for and more. -Original Message- From: Alan Tan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:02 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: How to retreive client permission on public folder Subject: How to retreive client permission on public folder Greetings, Hi i am running a Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on a W2K machine. I would like to know whether is there any tools/scripts that i can use to auto retreive client permission on the many public folder that i have in my exchange server. It will be quite an hassle to retreive these client permission one by one in each of the public folder manaully. Appreciate any help. Thanks Alan Tan Senior System Consultant Nomura Research Institute 6 Battery Road #36-01 Singapore 049909 (o) +65 6420 1946 (f) +65 6420 1989 (m) 96710270 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange OWA behaviour
Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system recently? -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour Subject: Strange OWA behaviour Hi all. Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0 SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for each of my organisation users. Any idea? List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Yep, you bet -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Yeah but you did run "Naveupdate" after you set it to "0" right? -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 08:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Yes, I did run that and I have the same build. The key in question is AllowEncryptedArchives, correct? I set it to both 1 (it was already set to that) and 0 and the password protected zip file (using WinZip 8) got quarantined (it contained two .vbs files) Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I'd assume you did do the NAVEupdate as you changed the registry, what build of NAV? Mine is 2.18(Build 80). The only reason I suggested RAR was I knew NAV can't read it, so it would allow it through. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I found this (http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180 069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocument&prod=Norton%20AntiViru s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchange&ver=2.x&src=ent&pcode=nav_exchange&dtype=corp &svy=&prev=&miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says it should allow ZIP files through if it's password protected but it didn't. I tried both 1 and 0 for the entry but it still got stopped. I tried rar files, password protected and it got through, no problems. I then tried a non pasword protected rar file and it to got through. How interesting... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-
RE: Strange OWA behaviour
Sorry, I missed that one... Exchange 2000 SP3 + Post_SP3_Rollup, Windows 2000 SP4. Changes made recently: - Changed registry value restrictanonymous from 0 to 2 - disabled parent paths in IIS -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 16:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system recently? -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour Subject: Strange OWA behaviour Hi all. Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0 SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for each of my organisation users. Any idea? List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
An update for all those following this thread. Last night we separated the Exchange server from the main backup job and both ran flawlessly. Amazing. Wonder what Veritas will have to say about that... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yup. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you tried to uninstall the Agent then reinstall? Just a thought... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put in place? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers. The Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it fail. Backup rate is SWEET! As well. Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min with Exchange. Love that SDLT tape drive! Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yea, we went through all that as well. I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck. Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds.. - Original Message - From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with > Backup Exec 9 > > > No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no > problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem > seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers > in one job. > > Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a > separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will > update the list with results. > > > > Thanks...Ray > > Thought for the day: > A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and > your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a > serious vocational error. > --Dennis Miller > > > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM > To: Exchange Discus
RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
I'm sorry, it's backing up in the outbound queue (outbound messages awaiting deliver). Looking at the messages usually indicates a name resolution issue which, of course, is DNS. But I don't understand why it (DNS) would just stop working. I've got my main Active Directory server (which is also my main file and print server) running DNS. I have a static IP address on the Exchange server pointing to the DNS server as the primary and then to my ISP's DNS servers as secondary (and tertiary). You know I'm also getting messages from the Exchange listserv that my account is on hold. I know Ed looked into this earlier and noticed something wonky but I was never able to figure out how to resolve it. Right now I'm answering this on the Swynk website since I'm not receiving messages again from the group. I did find a post through Google that said I should restart the MTA as well as the IMC. But I'm thinking if this is a DNS issue that's not going to help. But then, I don't understand why rebooting the computer helps since DNS is on a completely different machine. The DNS Event log on my DNS server is "clean" there are only informational events, nothing even remotely resembling anything wrong with DNS on that machine, so it's GOT to be localized to the Exchange server. I see nothing in either the Application or System logs in the Event viewer prior to this problem that gives me any clues. Thanks for any thoughts. John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
- Original Message - From: "John Orban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:58 AM Subject: RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? > I'm sorry, it's backing up in the outbound queue (outbound messages > awaiting deliver). Looking at the messages usually indicates a name > resolution issue which, of course, is DNS. But I don't understand why it > (DNS) would just stop working. I've got my main Active Directory server > (which is also my main file and print server) running DNS. > > I have a static IP address on the Exchange server pointing to the DNS > server as the primary and then to my ISP's DNS servers as secondary (and > tertiary). > > You know I'm also getting messages from the Exchange listserv that my > account is on hold. I know Ed looked into this earlier and noticed > something wonky but I was never able to figure out how to resolve it. > Right now I'm answering this on the Swynk website since I'm not receiving > messages again from the group. > > I did find a post through Google that said I should restart the MTA as > well as the IMC. But I'm thinking if this is a DNS issue that's not going > to help. But then, I don't understand why rebooting the computer helps > since DNS is on a completely different machine. > > The DNS Event log on my DNS server is "clean" there are only informational > events, nothing even remotely resembling anything wrong with DNS on that > machine, so it's GOT to be localized to the Exchange server. > > I see nothing in either the Application or System logs in the Event viewer > prior to this problem that gives me any clues. > > Thanks for any thoughts. > > John > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL
You could also try simplifying the process of importing the meetings/events using the Slipstick transmit holiday form. http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/holiday.htm. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL I don't think the problem was adding members to a DL, but rather getting the appointment onto the calendars of new members automagically. -Original Message- From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:25 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL The other option is to upgrade to the 2003 family of products (Windows 2003 with AD 2003) and Exchange 2003 and use Query Based Distribution Groups (you can then include all mailboxes and when a new one is created it will automatically be a member). For the organisation I work with the Query based group is the killer reason for moving to Exchange 2003 (plus OWA)... My 0.02 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wade Robinson Sent: 26 August 2003 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Thanks I am going to suggest we add this to the new account creation process or hire developer if it is that important. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 3:03 PM Posted To: Exchange List Server Conversation: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Without some coding? I don't think so. Do you have a new hire workflow? Can this step be added to it? i.e. once the employee has had his/her accounts created, have the CEO's admin add this person to the invitee list, and then send an Update only to changed people. You could import from a Vcal or PST file, but it won't capture any changes made to the original meeting request. > -Original Message- > From: Wade Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL > > > MY CEO has a mandatory monthly meeting that he has assigned to our all > employee distribution list. He is very bitter that each time we get a > new employee the meeting does not automatically show up on their > calendar. Is there any way to have the meeting automatically show up > in the new use calendar? > > thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
Certainly sounds like DNS to me. When you do nslookups from the Exch Server, what server does it attempt to contact and can it successfully resolve external names? - Original Message - From: "John Orban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:58 AM Subject: RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? > I'm sorry, it's backing up in the outbound queue (outbound messages > awaiting deliver). Looking at the messages usually indicates a name > resolution issue which, of course, is DNS. But I don't understand why it > (DNS) would just stop working. I've got my main Active Directory server > (which is also my main file and print server) running DNS. > > I have a static IP address on the Exchange server pointing to the DNS > server as the primary and then to my ISP's DNS servers as secondary (and > tertiary). > > You know I'm also getting messages from the Exchange listserv that my > account is on hold. I know Ed looked into this earlier and noticed > something wonky but I was never able to figure out how to resolve it. > Right now I'm answering this on the Swynk website since I'm not receiving > messages again from the group. > > I did find a post through Google that said I should restart the MTA as > well as the IMC. But I'm thinking if this is a DNS issue that's not going > to help. But then, I don't understand why rebooting the computer helps > since DNS is on a completely different machine. > > The DNS Event log on my DNS server is "clean" there are only informational > events, nothing even remotely resembling anything wrong with DNS on that > machine, so it's GOT to be localized to the Exchange server. > > I see nothing in either the Application or System logs in the Event viewer > prior to this problem that gives me any clues. > > Thanks for any thoughts. > > John > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
Newprof is a tool that comes with outlook. It is actually found the resource utility toolkit CD. Newprof will create Outlook profiles but many people find it difficult to work with. The attached link describes Newprof and compares it to a commercial product OProfile. OProfile is probably the most popular application used for automatically creating Outlook profiles. It offers a wizard interface and allows you to set many more options than available via Newprof. http://imanami.com/downloadcenter/support/docs/Imanami%20OProfile%20vs%2 0Microsoft%20Resource%20Kit%20Tools.pdf Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary? Does everybody else use it? Robert -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client Using newprof? - Original Message - From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client > We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows > XP workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. > > Several of our users are receiving the following error message when > they log > in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. > > "Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a > problem and > needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in > the middle of something, the information you were working on might be > lost. Please tell Microsoft about this problem". > > The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook > with no problems. > > Has anybody seen this issue? > > Thanks > > Robert > > > *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** > This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic > mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. > *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange OWA behaviour
I believe disabling parent paths is what has caused the behavior you are seeing. You might try tweaking settings to allow parent paths only on the OWA website in your lab, but I'd test it thoroughly before making any changes to your production servers. -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:51 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour Sorry, I missed that one... Exchange 2000 SP3 + Post_SP3_Rollup, Windows 2000 SP4. Changes made recently: - Changed registry value restrictanonymous from 0 to 2 - disabled parent paths in IIS -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 16:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system recently? -Original Message- From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour Subject: Strange OWA behaviour Hi all. Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0 SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for each of my organisation users. Any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
Ah outbound. OK, it's probably a problem with your McCrappy box then if I understand your configuration correctly. Your IMS is configured to forward all mail to a specific host and that host is the McCrappy box correct? If that's the case, I believe that if you enable some verbose logging you'll see your IMS queue go wonky immediately following a refusal by your smart host to accept mail which it should be accepting. That puts your IMS into a retry state because it's link is down according to its routing logic. -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:58 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? Subject: RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? I'm sorry, it's backing up in the outbound queue (outbound messages awaiting deliver). Looking at the messages usually indicates a name resolution issue which, of course, is DNS. But I don't understand why it (DNS) would just stop working. I've got my main Active Directory server (which is also my main file and print server) running DNS. I have a static IP address on the Exchange server pointing to the DNS server as the primary and then to my ISP's DNS servers as secondary (and tertiary). You know I'm also getting messages from the Exchange listserv that my account is on hold. I know Ed looked into this earlier and noticed something wonky but I was never able to figure out how to resolve it. Right now I'm answering this on the Swynk website since I'm not receiving messages again from the group. I did find a post through Google that said I should restart the MTA as well as the IMC. But I'm thinking if this is a DNS issue that's not going to help. But then, I don't understand why rebooting the computer helps since DNS is on a completely different machine. The DNS Event log on my DNS server is "clean" there are only informational events, nothing even remotely resembling anything wrong with DNS on that machine, so it's GOT to be localized to the Exchange server. I see nothing in either the Application or System logs in the Event viewer prior to this problem that gives me any clues. Thanks for any thoughts. John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Logout page not displaying
I recently had the same issue and I believe running through the process to manually sync the IWAM and IUSR accounts between the Active Directory and the metabase. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Logout page not displaying Hi list, having a small problem with our OWA clients receiving a HTTP 500 - Internal server error "The page cannot be displayed", when logging out of OWA. If I turn off friendly http errors I receive, "Server Application Error The server has encountered an error while loading an application during the processing of your request. Please refer to the event log for more detail information. Please contact the server administrator for assistance" The event log on the cluster has this entry Event ID 36: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/Root Have found several articles relating to similar IIS issues but nothing specific to exchange. Most articles seem to point to the IWAM_MACHINENAME and IUSR_MACHINENAME not being in sync. Anyone experiencd this problem? Cheers Richard *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
I'm shocked! - Original Message - From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:56 AM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 An update for all those following this thread. Last night we separated the Exchange server from the main backup job and both ran flawlessly. Amazing. Wonder what Veritas will have to say about that... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yup. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you tried to uninstall the Agent then reinstall? Just a thought... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put in place? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers. The Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it fail. Backup rate is SWEET! As well. Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min with Exchange. Love that SDLT tape drive! Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yea, we went through all that as well. I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck. Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds.. - Original Message - From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with > Backup Exec 9 > > > No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no > problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem > seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers > in one job. > > Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a > separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will > update the list with results. > > > > Thanks...Ray > > Thought for the day: > A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and > your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a > serious vocational error. > --Dennis Miller > > > >
RE: Message Filtering
Ben / Roger, I can only take a guess that they set the logic up so that the entry "@domainname.com" would by default block that domain and every subdomain below it. If you wanted to let subdomains through, you would have to explicitly block the ones you don't want through. For example: 1. There is 1 primary domain and 4 subdomains: domain.com, sub1.domain.com, sub2.domain.com, sub3.domain.com, sub4.domain.com 2. You are getting spam from the primary domain and subdomains 2 and 4. 3. So in your block list, you would have: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @sub2.domain.com @sub4.domain.com 4. It will now block those three domain names and let sub1.domain.com and sub3.domain.com through. ~Jim -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering That was my point as well - but apparently that's the way the functionality works. I'd call that a bug, but as Ex5.5 is close to end of life, I highly doubt its gonna get fixed. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Maybe it's just late but I don't understand how @ew01.com > would also block > the subdomains of that domain. > > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > Mike, > > I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com > > ~Jim > > P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company block list. > Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0) > > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Jim, > > Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it. > > I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I > used ew01.com > and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have > blocked this junk mail? > > Thanks, > > Mike > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Roger, > > I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it: > > Paul Robichaux's "Managing MS Exchange Server", Chapter 8, pg > 294, bottom of > the page: > > @foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com > > So Nate's response was spot on. > > Jim Blunt > E-mail Admin > Network Infrastructure Group > Bechtel Hanford, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Hmm - I have no problem with you saying it works that way > (haven't been able > to try it) but that's not the way I would expect it to work - > I would expect > it to be more restrictive in how it blocks, so @ivy.com only blocks > @ivy.com. > > That's pretty standard practice in other MTA's I've used over > the years, > which is why it seems a little out of whack. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:43 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Then can you explain why I can enter @fr or @biz and the > server blocks > > anything that ends with .fr or .biz. Doesn't this qualify > as blocking > > any domain or subdomain that ends with these? It seems to > me that it > > does. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > From: Roger Seielstad > > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:34 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Actually, that doesn't support what you're saying. > > > > > > "To prevent all users in a specific domain from delivering > > messages to > > > your > > > site, type the domain name in the following format: > @domainname.com" > > > > > > > > > Ivy.com and mail.ivy.com are two, distinct domains, and > > therefore blocking > > > @ivy.com should not implicitly block @mail.ivy.com. > > > > > > I'd be interested to know that it blocks subdomains that > it is not > > > explicitly told to blo
Re: Trend Discussion List??
Not that I know of, or have ever found. The forums at arstechnica.com are fairly useful, but not at all specific to one product. Anything specific in mind? Paul - Original Message - From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:27 PM Subject: Trend Discussion List?? > Does anybody know of a Trend discussion list? > > _ > MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Filtering
I guess I look at it from the Unix side of things[1], in which blocking @domain.com doesn't block anything but @domain.com - @mail.domain.com would still work. In order to subdomain block, it's a simple matter of adding a wildcard - @*.domain.com That's the way Sendmail, smtpd and postfix all seem to work, from what I've seen. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. [1] I'm predominantly an MS admin, but we use Unix stuff for most mail relays outside of Exchange > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Ben / Roger, > > I can only take a guess that they set the logic up so that the entry > "@domainname.com" would by default block that domain and > every subdomain > below it. If you wanted to let subdomains through, you would have to > explicitly block the ones you don't want through. For example: > > 1. There is 1 primary domain and 4 subdomains: domain.com, > sub1.domain.com, sub2.domain.com, sub3.domain.com, sub4.domain.com > 2. You are getting spam from the primary domain and > subdomains 2 and 4. > 3. So in your block list, you would have: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > @sub2.domain.com > @sub4.domain.com > 4. It will now block those three domain names and let > sub1.domain.com and > sub3.domain.com through. > > ~Jim > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > That was my point as well - but apparently that's the way the > functionality > works. > > I'd call that a bug, but as Ex5.5 is close to end of life, I > highly doubt > its gonna get fixed. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Maybe it's just late but I don't understand how @ew01.com > > would also block > > the subdomains of that domain. > > > > > > -Ben- > > Ben M. Schorr > > Director of Information Services > > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > Mike, > > > > I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com > > > > ~Jim > > > > P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company > block list. > > Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Jim, > > > > Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it. > > > > I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I > > used ew01.com > > and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how > would you have > > blocked this junk mail? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Roger, > > > > I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it: > > > > Paul Robichaux's "Managing MS Exchange Server", Chapter 8, pg > > 294, bottom of > > the page: > > > > @foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com > > > > So Nate's response was spot on. > > > > Jim Blunt > > E-mail Admin > > Network Infrastructure Group > > Bechtel Hanford, Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Hmm - I have no problem with you saying it works that way > > (haven't been able > > to try it) but that's not the way I would expect it to work - > > I would expect > > it to be more restrictive in how it blocks, so @ivy.com only blocks > > @ivy.com. > > > > That's pretty standard practice in other MTA's I've used over > > the years, > > which is why it seems a little out of whack. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26,
RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
Oprofile works great here at the San Diego Community College's(3000+ clients), but it does have its own idiosyncrasy in using xp on an image. john -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client Newprof is a tool that comes with outlook. It is actually found the resource utility toolkit CD. Newprof will create Outlook profiles but many people find it difficult to work with. The attached link describes Newprof and compares it to a commercial product OProfile. OProfile is probably the most popular application used for automatically creating Outlook profiles. It offers a wizard interface and allows you to set many more options than available via Newprof. http://imanami.com/downloadcenter/support/docs/Imanami%20OProfile%20vs%2 0Microsoft%20Resource%20Kit%20Tools.pdf Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary? Does everybody else use it? Robert -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client Using newprof? - Original Message - From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client > We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows > XP workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. > > Several of our users are receiving the following error message when > they log > in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. > > "Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a > problem and > needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in > the middle of something, the information you were working on might be > lost. Please tell Microsoft about this problem". > > The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook > with no problems. > > Has anybody seen this issue? > > Thanks > > Robert > > > *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** > This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic > mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. > *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT :: Other Discussion List
Does anybody know of good lists for SMS Windows Scripting Windows 2000 and AD? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
No What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)? ActiveDir.org -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List Does anybody know of good lists for SMS Windows Scripting Windows 2000 and AD? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
Would prefer vbscript for now it's all I know Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List No What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)? ActiveDir.org -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List Does anybody know of good lists for SMS Windows Scripting Windows 2000 and AD? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
Sorry, can't help ya there, I use perl. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List Would prefer vbscript for now it's all I know Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List No What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)? ActiveDir.org -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List Does anybody know of good lists for SMS Windows Scripting Windows 2000 and AD? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
/s/perl/vbscript -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List Sorry, can't help ya there, I use perl. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List Would prefer vbscript for now it's all I know Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List No What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)? ActiveDir.org -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List Does anybody know of good lists for SMS Windows Scripting Windows 2000 and AD? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Filtering
When I first started using that feature, the wildcard syntax is the way I expected it to work at first as well. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering I guess I look at it from the Unix side of things[1], in which blocking @domain.com doesn't block anything but @domain.com - @mail.domain.com would still work. In order to subdomain block, it's a simple matter of adding a wildcard - @*.domain.com That's the way Sendmail, smtpd and postfix all seem to work, from what I've seen. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. [1] I'm predominantly an MS admin, but we use Unix stuff for most mail relays outside of Exchange > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > Ben / Roger, > > I can only take a guess that they set the logic up so that the entry > "@domainname.com" would by default block that domain and every > subdomain below it. If you wanted to let subdomains through, you > would have to explicitly block the ones you don't want through. For > example: > > 1. There is 1 primary domain and 4 subdomains: domain.com, > sub1.domain.com, sub2.domain.com, sub3.domain.com, sub4.domain.com 2. > You are getting spam from the primary domain and subdomains 2 and 4. > 3. So in your block list, you would have: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > @sub2.domain.com > @sub4.domain.com > 4. It will now block those three domain names and let > sub1.domain.com and > sub3.domain.com through. > > ~Jim > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > That was my point as well - but apparently that's the way the > functionality > works. > > I'd call that a bug, but as Ex5.5 is close to end of life, I > highly doubt > its gonna get fixed. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Maybe it's just late but I don't understand how @ew01.com would also > > block the subdomains of that domain. > > > > > > -Ben- > > Ben M. Schorr > > Director of Information Services > > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > Mike, > > > > I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com > > > > ~Jim > > > > P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company > block list. > > Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Jim, > > > > Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it. > > > > I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I used > > ew01.com and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how > would you have > > blocked this junk mail? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Roger, > > > > I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it: > > > > Paul Robichaux's "Managing MS Exchange Server", Chapter 8, pg 294, > > bottom of the page: > > > > @foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com > > > > So Nate's response was spot on. > > > > Jim Blunt > > E-mail Admin > > Network Infrastructure Group > > Bechtel Hanford, Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Message Filtering > > > > > > Hmm - I have no problem with you saying it works that way (haven't > > been able to try it) but that's not the way I would expect it to > > work - I would expect > > it to be more restrictive in how it blocks, so @ivy.com only blocks > > @ivy.com. > > > > That's pretty standard practice in other MTA's I've used over the > > years, which is why it seems a little out of whack. > > > > ---
RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
One of the best SMS discussion lists on the Net is over at www.myITForum.com, run by Rod Trent. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List Does anybody know of good lists for SMS Windows Scripting Windows 2000 and AD? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trend Discussion List??
We have a Trend serverthat from time to time locks up when under heavy traffic. Been working on this now for over 2 months. No one seems to know the answer and yes Trend and MS have been involved. Thought maybe someone ran ninto this and found something that Trend nor Ms have had us try. From: "Paul Hutchings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Trend Discussion List?? Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:29:04 +0100 Not that I know of, or have ever found. The forums at arstechnica.com are fairly useful, but not at all specific to one product. Anything specific in mind? Paul - Original Message - From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:27 PM Subject: Trend Discussion List?? > Does anybody know of a Trend discussion list? > > _ > MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get MSN 8 and enjoy automatic e-mail virus protection. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quickie OST ?
When is an OST file created. The first time you add the service or the first time you synchronize? _ Get MSN 8 and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outbound Mail Routing through an ISP
I have an exchange 2000 server at home that I use to practice with. Since I am using a
residential ISP a lot of the email I send gets blocked at the recipients gateways
because they use a service that lists me as a residential IP.
I have done some research and found some information on smart hosts. I have tried to
configure my server to use the smart host and provided my credentials that I use for
my ISP's smtp server. However, when I send email I get no errors from the SMTP server
but after a while I get and NDR. It appears that the messages get queue, but it can't
send it out to this server.
I tried a couple online email services and they had similar problems. Does anyone know
of an ISP or email provider with a SMTP gateway that will accept the smart host
connections from my Exchange server. This way my outbound email won't get blocked?
Also is there a better way of forwarding mail out through an ISP.
My server is Windows 2000 SP2 Running Exchange 2000 SP2
Thanks for any help.
-Rick
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªٖy²'µêßiǡ¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿råʸ¬¦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡ץjx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê&!jx .+-i٢X¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
I like batch file scripting -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List /s/perl/vbscript -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List Sorry, can't help ya there, I use perl. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List Would prefer vbscript for now it's all I know Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List No What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)? ActiveDir.org -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List Does anybody know of good lists for SMS Windows Scripting Windows 2000 and AD? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quickie OST ?
OST isn't a service, it's a setting. When you enable offline folders it asks for the location of the OST. When you click OK it checks for the existence of the file and if it doesn't exist it asks if you want to create it. Course that all changes with O2K3. :) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:20 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Quickie OST ? Subject: Quickie OST ? When is an OST file created. The first time you add the service or the first time you synchronize? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quickie OST ?
Thanks for the long story. I win a soda pop. I bet someone it was when you added it to Outlook and not when you first synchronze. From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Quickie OST ? Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:21:55 -0500 OST isn't a service, it's a setting. When you enable offline folders it asks for the location of the OST. When you click OK it checks for the existence of the file and if it doesn't exist it asks if you want to create it. Course that all changes with O2K3. :) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:20 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Quickie OST ? Subject: Quickie OST ? When is an OST file created. The first time you add the service or the first time you synchronize? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quickie OST ?
When you add the service, the .ost is created. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quickie OST ? When is an OST file created. The first time you add the service or the first time you synchronize? _ Get MSN 8 and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
