RE: Exchange and SAN
Mark Twain said: "Put all your eggs in one basket, and watch that basket." Seriously though if you have good SAN hardware, the uptime on that equipment is amazing. You have to remember that everything is redundant. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN I can't get past the concept that if the SAN dies (ie FC card or Power Supplies) then all teh servers you have attached to it are dead in the water. Sounds like a quasi mainframe to me. I still prefer many eggs and many baskets and take the disk hit. Mind you I would be interested in SAN technology just to put the tape drives external to the server room (like a few miles away via fibre) cheers Dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/09/2003 7:52:42 a.m. >>> I'll kindly ask you to get off of my soapbox. My favorite one I've heard lately: "Well, it uses fiber to attach to the SAN so it's much faster for Exchange." -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN As long as you don't buy into the great white lie of SAN's, you're golden. That lie is that there's no performance hit created by taking a single large array and carving it into a bunch of LUNs - there's a physics issue there. Other than that, its just a bunch of disks, just like the SCSI attached ones you probably have now. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange and SAN > > > Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues > with it? I've > always had a raid array attached to it which could be the > same thing but did > not know if there were any major differences? Any help would > be appreciate > it. > > Thanks, > Mario > > > ** > * > The contents of this communication are intended only for the > addressee and > may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you > are not the > intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this > communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other > information in this communication that do not relate to the official > business of my company shall be understood as neither given > nor endorsed by > it. > ** > * > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL P
RE: Exchange and SAN
I can't get past the concept that if the SAN dies (ie FC card or Power Supplies) then all teh servers you have attached to it are dead in the water. Sounds like a quasi mainframe to me. I still prefer many eggs and many baskets and take the disk hit. Mind you I would be interested in SAN technology just to put the tape drives external to the server room (like a few miles away via fibre) cheers Dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/09/2003 7:52:42 a.m. >>> I'll kindly ask you to get off of my soapbox. My favorite one I've heard lately: "Well, it uses fiber to attach to the SAN so it's much faster for Exchange." -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN As long as you don't buy into the great white lie of SAN's, you're golden. That lie is that there's no performance hit created by taking a single large array and carving it into a bunch of LUNs - there's a physics issue there. Other than that, its just a bunch of disks, just like the SCSI attached ones you probably have now. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange and SAN > > > Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues > with it? I've > always had a raid array attached to it which could be the > same thing but did > not know if there were any major differences? Any help would > be appreciate > it. > > Thanks, > Mario > > > ** > * > The contents of this communication are intended only for the > addressee and > may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you > are not the > intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this > communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other > information in this communication that do not relate to the official > business of my company shall be understood as neither given > nor endorsed by > it. > ** > * > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Location of public folders for WebDAV
Does that URL work only on the server? I've tried both the form below, and with a . replaced by the Exchange server name. Neither one has any luck. I can see the public folders in OWA (//server/public/folder), but I don't know if that's related to the WebDAV location or not. Thanks Erick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fyodorov, > Andrey > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Location of public folders for WebDAV > > > I think it is this - > > \\.\BackOfficeStorage\your.domain.name.com\Public Folders > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Location of public folders for WebDAV > > I'm playing around with WebDAV as a way to get data out of public > folders. However, I am unable to find a reference as to what form the > URLs should take. I've seen a number of examples, but they are almost > all for individual mailboxes, and all differ. What would be > the root of > the public folder tree as far as WebDAV is concerned? > > Thanks, > Erick > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary
Thanks, that was easy :-). If you are ever in chicago, look me up, I'll buy you a beer. Raj -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Modify your Recipient Policy :-) See, that wasn't too hard. In your recip. Policy properties, you have the e-mail addresses defined. Add the second address, and choose Set as Primary. It will update all the users automagically. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:31 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Subject: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Hello All, My client has merged with another firm.Is there a tool to add another smtp address and making it primary without going thru' the hassle of manually touching every user account? Exchange 2000 Server enterprise edition. Sp3 / windows 2000 sp2. Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary
I'd probably add a new recipient policy. I thoroughly enjoy the results I achieve by never touching the default one. Especially never changing the default SMTP domain on the default recipient policy. (this may be one of those superstition things, of course) -tom > -Original Message- > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:39 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Adding another smtp address and making it primary > Subject: RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary > > > Modify your Recipient Policy :-) See, that wasn't too hard. > > In your recip. Policy properties, you have the e-mail > addresses defined. > Add the second address, and choose Set as Primary. It will update all > the users automagically. > > > Ben Winzenz > Network Engineer > Gardner & White > (317) 581-1580 ext 418 > > > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:31 PM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: Adding another smtp address and making it primary > Subject: Adding another smtp address and making it primary > > > > > Hello All, > > My client has merged with another firm.Is there a tool to add another > smtp address and making it primary without going thru' the hassle of > manually touching every user account? > > Exchange 2000 Server enterprise edition. Sp3 / windows 2000 sp2. > > Thanks > > Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary
Modify your Recipient Policy :-) See, that wasn't too hard. In your recip. Policy properties, you have the e-mail addresses defined. Add the second address, and choose Set as Primary. It will update all the users automagically. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:31 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Subject: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Hello All, My client has merged with another firm.Is there a tool to add another smtp address and making it primary without going thru' the hassle of manually touching every user account? Exchange 2000 Server enterprise edition. Sp3 / windows 2000 sp2. Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018
Thanks Jeff, We are on our 5th server now, articles indicate it could be hardware or software problems. I have not found any errors relating to a hardware problem. As for software there are a couple of items we need to address per the last of these articles, at least before we contact Microsoft if needed: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;192333 (service pack) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;151789 (restore from backup) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262196 (hard repair) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;271987 (overview) "The best way to prevent physical corruption is to outfit the server with quality hardware components and configure the system correctly. Make sure that you are not running file-level utilities, such as antivirus software, against database and log files on the computer that runs Exchange Server." "Because Exchange Server is transaction-based, avoid performing a file-level or offline backup of the database files on disk. The best way to ensure that you are preserving all data in the system, including transactions that have not yet been flushed to disk, is to perform regular online backups." --- Jeff Beckham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Start running some hardware diagnostics and put the > backup tape (last > successfull one) in the bullpen. > > XADM: Understanding and Analyzing -1018, -1019, and > -1022 Exchange > Database Errors > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314917 > > Here's some other light reading as well > > 314917 XADM: Understanding and Analyzing -1018, > -1019, and -1022 Errors > 188646 XADM: Unable to Back Up Exchange Server 5.5 > with Event ID 105 > 151789 XADM: Error -1018 (JET_errReadVerifyFailure) > 237953 XADM: Erroneous -1018 Error Returned During > Online Backup > 322729 XADM: -1018 and -1022 Errors on Dell > PowerEdge Servers > > Jeff > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of NetStar > Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:44 PM > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > Conversation: MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read > page checksum error > -1018 > Subject: MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page > checksum error -1018 > > Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on AWin2k. > > Has everyone seen this error? We have been getting > this error recently and its starting to do it on > other > mail server. I don't think its the backup that is > causing this. Any help would be greatful. > > "servername": EventID: 0x0074 (116) - > MSExchangeIS > (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 > ((1:1193209 1:12905) (0-444089533) (0-898313961)) > occurred. Please restore the databases from a > previous backup. > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site > design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding another smtp address and making it primary
Hello All, My client has merged with another firm.Is there a tool to add another smtp address and making it primary without going thru' the hassle of manually touching every user account? Exchange 2000 Server enterprise edition. Sp3 / windows 2000 sp2. Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018
Start running some hardware diagnostics and put the backup tape (last successfull one) in the bullpen. XADM: Understanding and Analyzing -1018, -1019, and -1022 Exchange Database Errors http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314917 Here's some other light reading as well 314917 XADM: Understanding and Analyzing -1018, -1019, and -1022 Errors 188646 XADM: Unable to Back Up Exchange Server 5.5 with Event ID 105 151789 XADM: Error -1018 (JET_errReadVerifyFailure) 237953 XADM: Erroneous -1018 Error Returned During Online Backup 322729 XADM: -1018 and -1022 Errors on Dell PowerEdge Servers Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetStar Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 Subject: MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on AWin2k. Has everyone seen this error? We have been getting this error recently and its starting to do it on other mail server. I don't think its the backup that is causing this. Any help would be greatful. "servername": EventID: 0x0074 (116) - MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 ((1:1193209 1:12905) (0-444089533) (0-898313961)) occurred. Please restore the databases from a previous backup. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hang up in exchange 5.5
what do you mean by PSS?? never heard that term.. happening all the time. any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018
Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on AWin2k. Has everyone seen this error? We have been getting this error recently and its starting to do it on other mail server. I don't think its the backup that is causing this. Any help would be greatful. "servername": EventID: 0x0074 (116) - MSExchangeIS (468) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 ((1:1193209 1:12905) (0-444089533) (0-898313961)) occurred. Please restore the databases from a previous backup. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
I suggest you test a real restore at some point. Even just doing a file restore is not pretty in ArghServ -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 3:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup > > > I don't know if this makes a difference or not, but the setup I use is > this: > > ARCserve machine installed using MSSQL database > I backup everything to a SCSI Array (I keep 5 days backup on the array > of all servers) > Every night I dump everything to tape (LTO 100/200) > > So I have never had to restore anything from tape. And I also > do a full > backup of the backup server to tape. So the worst case is I > will have to > restore the backup server then restore all my other servers once the > backup server is up or restore each server individually. > > You might laugh at this method, but it works. > > > Christopher > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup > > > Be sure to tell us how well the restore goes... It's not > that we don't > like it because it doesn't backup; it has a serious problem with > restoring... > > -Original Message- > From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:22 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup > > > Why is everyone against ARCserve? I have been using ARCserve > v. 9.01 to > do brick level backups and I have never have a problem with it. The > largest mailbox that I do a brick level backup on is 729megs > and most of > the mailboxes are over 100megs. I have never had a failed job > and I have > done successful restores. I would have to say the ARCserve 9.01 is a > solid product it is a 200% improvement over ARCserve 7. The only bad > thing I can say is that it is a little on the expensive side, > but I use > it to backup 6 servers and 3 databases. > > > Chris > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SAN
Hey, they use the same letters, so they have to be the same thing, right?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 4:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN
>
>
> My biggest problem is the amount of jerk-off sellers.
>
> We asked for
> i) a san
> ii) some direct-attatched external storage
>
> The amount of vendors who took those comments on board, asked
> what we wanted them for, and then promptly quoted for a NAS
> device was quite depressing. Idiots.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 19/09/2003 20:52
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN
>
>
>
> I'll kindly ask you to get off of my soapbox.
>
> My favorite one I've heard lately: "Well, it uses fiber
> to attach to the SAN
> so it's much faster for Exchange."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN
>
>
> As long as you don't buy into the great white lie of
> SAN's, you're golden.
>
> That lie is that there's no performance hit created by
> taking a single large
> array and carving it into a bunch of LUNs - there's a
> physics issue there.
> Other than that, its just a bunch of disks, just like
> the SCSI attached ones
> you probably have now.
>
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:17 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Exchange and SAN
> >
> >
> > Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues
> > with it? I've
> > always had a raid array attached to it which could be the
> > same thing but did
> > not know if there were any major differences? Any help would
> > be appreciate
> > it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mario
> >
> >
> > **
> > *
> > The contents of this communication are intended only for the
> > addressee and
> > may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you
> > are not the
> > intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or
> disclose this
> > communication and notify the sender. Opinions,
> conclusions and other
> > information in this communication that do not relate
> to the official
> > business of my company shall be understood as neither given
> > nor endorsed by
> > it.
> > **
> > *
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _
> > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web
> Interface:
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \ٖy'iǡ)l+-rrʸW{jxm^zx%S칻 &ޙ^jZ 2G(L\xfyb֝))
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
As currently designed, it requires a third party LEAP client be installed, on top of the wiredless client needed for the card and any other necessary software. Not high on my favorites list right now.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 5:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > S!! > > Our security folks wanted SecurID for wireless, but we managed to talk > them into just a userid/passwd. We told them NO ONE ELSE was using > SecurID for wireless... > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > It really is a cool system. > > We're currently using it for VPN access and front ending OWA, > and we're > playing with it and some Cisco Aironet wireless devices - requiring > SecurID authentication before you get onto the wireless network. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:21 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > > > > I've not examined the system for several years (I'm just a > happy user > > now, not and admin), but at least at one time SecurID would > accept the > > > current code (of course),one code behind or one ahead for a total > > window of 3 minutes as Roger notes. > > > > If the gadget's clock had drifted to more than one minute > off, and you > > > were TWO codes ahead or behind, the system would > additionally prompt > > for the NEXT code displayed to make sure you were you, and it would > > update the stored time offset for your gadget. Pretty slick system. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:01 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > > > > Actually, you've got the system down correctly. > > > > However, the slack time is +/- 1 minute, so you really get 3 > > minutes per > > code. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:29 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > > > > > > > Forgive me for arguing, but I believe the time alloted > for guessing > > > that third factor is even less than indicated below. Of course, > > > by token, I am > > > referring to what RSA calls a "keyfob." Is that what you are > > > referring to > > > as well? > > > > > > Here is what I understand to be the process, from reading the > > > manuals we > > > have: > > > 1. Upon issuance to the user, you synch the token/keyfob > > > with the the RSA > > > server DB. > > > 2. A 6-digit code displays for 1 minute on the token. > > > 3. If used for authentication within that 1 minute period, it is > > > "time-stamped" as to when you entered the Passcode (PIN + > > > code) and has an > > > additional 1 minute latency period. Meaning that if you > > > dial-up and enter > > > your passcode, 30-seconds into the code, you have 1:30 to > > > connect to the > > > dial-up server and be authenticated. > > > 4. If you enter the same code after the display has rolled > > > over however, > > > that code is no longer valid, as the timestamp when you > > > entered it will no > > > longer match with the timestamp on the server for when that > > > code was valid. > > > > > > So the short version is that if you enter the code while it's > > > displaying on the token, it's good for 1 minute with a 1 minute > > > latency period. If you > > > don't enter the number while it's viewable, then you've > > > missed your window > > > of opportunity, because it was only good for one minute. Oh > > > and BTW...if > > > you are trying to guess the code and miss it three times, > > > regardless of > > > length of time between guesses, it will lock your token until > > > an admin can > > > reset it. > > > > > > That's how I understand the process. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 5:44 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > > > > >
RE: Help - Relay??
Maybe reverse Name resolution problem. From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:33:37 -0500 What is in the bounce message now that you've disabled the Stupid Mailguard "feature"? What antispam/antivirus software do you have in there, and what sort of traffic is it configured to dump? -tom > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:29 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Help - Relay?? > Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? > > > I had the Mailguard disabled on the PIX. > > This is interesting thoughI can receive just fine from my test > Hotmail account. However, I cannot receive from Yahoo or Advnet.net. > > Must be the way the Yahoo and Advnet.net mailservers look at my > mailserver > > Any ideas? > > Samantha > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? > > > Then What TOm suggested maybe the problem. I have had 5.7.1 > relay errors > > happen when MailGuard has been switched on at a PIX Firewall > that was in > the > loop. > > > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:09:52 -0400 > > Hi Tony and thanks for the reply. > > I also have a Advnet.net account that gets the same bounce > when sending > directly to the Exchange server (@exmail.macombisd.org). > > Our DNS points exmail.macombisd.org to 64.88.83.251. The reverse DNS > lookup points to xmail1 (name of the server). > > Hope this makes some kind of sense. > > Samantha > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Help - Relay?? > > > All email from Yahoo or just the one account. > > > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Help - Relay?? > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 > > Hello > > This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the > exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send > to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. > > Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? > > Thanks > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it > now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Help - Relay??
What is in the bounce message now that you've disabled the Stupid Mailguard "feature"? What antispam/antivirus software do you have in there, and what sort of traffic is it configured to dump? -tom > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:29 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Help - Relay?? > Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? > > > I had the Mailguard disabled on the PIX. > > This is interesting thoughI can receive just fine from my test > Hotmail account. However, I cannot receive from Yahoo or Advnet.net. > > Must be the way the Yahoo and Advnet.net mailservers look at my > mailserver > > Any ideas? > > Samantha > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? > > > Then What TOm suggested maybe the problem. I have had 5.7.1 > relay errors > > happen when MailGuard has been switched on at a PIX Firewall > that was in > the > loop. > > > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:09:52 -0400 > > Hi Tony and thanks for the reply. > > I also have a Advnet.net account that gets the same bounce > when sending > directly to the Exchange server (@exmail.macombisd.org). > > Our DNS points exmail.macombisd.org to 64.88.83.251. The reverse DNS > lookup points to xmail1 (name of the server). > > Hope this makes some kind of sense. > > Samantha > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Help - Relay?? > > > All email from Yahoo or just the one account. > > > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Help - Relay?? > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 > > Hello > > This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the > exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send > to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. > > Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? > > Thanks > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it > now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
RE: Help - Relay??
I had the Mailguard disabled on the PIX. This is interesting thoughI can receive just fine from my test Hotmail account. However, I cannot receive from Yahoo or Advnet.net. Must be the way the Yahoo and Advnet.net mailservers look at my mailserver Any ideas? Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Then What TOm suggested maybe the problem. I have had 5.7.1 relay errors happen when MailGuard has been switched on at a PIX Firewall that was in the loop. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:09:52 -0400 Hi Tony and thanks for the reply. I also have a Advnet.net account that gets the same bounce when sending directly to the Exchange server (@exmail.macombisd.org). Our DNS points exmail.macombisd.org to 64.88.83.251. The reverse DNS lookup points to xmail1 (name of the server). Hope this makes some kind of sense. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help - Relay?? All email from Yahoo or just the one account. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to update public free/busy data.
Well it 'could' always be something else, that is for sure. I know myself from here though, that exact message pops up on a regular basis and it is when someone (even if they have owner / editor rights) opens a calendar resource, be it an Admin Ass't opening their boss's calendar or someone booking a room. To me, it's quite common. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unable to update public free/busy data. I'm afraid I would disagree. I get the error occasionally myself, and am accessing nothing outside of my own mailbox. I've just triple-checked that to be certain. I have no delegates, and nobody has me as a delegate. I also am not synchronizing any Public Folders. Even if you are correct, why the warning message? Can it be prevented? Steve C. - Original Message - From: "Finch Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:49 AM Subject: RE: Unable to update public free/busy data. | That's just them opening someone else's (or a resource) calendar. | | -Original Message- | From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:45 | To: Exchange Discussions | Subject: Unable to update public free/busy data. | | | Exchange 2000 SP? version 6.0.6375.0 (on Windows 2000 SP4), Outlook | 2002 SP2 | + All Security Updates on Win 2000 Pro & XP Pro | | We have a number of users who are reporting that when they exit from Outlook | 2002 they get the following warning message: | | "Unable to update public free/busy data. You do not have sufficent | permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact | or your system administrator." | | Other users have reported getting the same error at random intervals | thoughout the day (likely when some background synchronization is | taking place -- or so I suspect). | | The Exchange Server is not local. It is located in another state and | accessed over a 4xT1 WAN link. I do not personally have access to the | Exchange Server (maddening for an ex-ExchAdmin like myself), but do | have contacts who are. | | Can anyone provide insight as to what "object" is being referenced | and/or what steps can be taken to eliminate the error? My research to | date has not | produced any solutions. | | Mucho Appreciato. | | Steven A. Christensen | Sr. Network Engineer | USPS Topeka MDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to update public free/busy data.
I'm afraid I would disagree. I get the error occasionally myself, and am accessing nothing outside of my own mailbox. I've just triple-checked that to be certain. I have no delegates, and nobody has me as a delegate. I also am not synchronizing any Public Folders. Even if you are correct, why the warning message? Can it be prevented? Steve C. - Original Message - From: "Finch Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:49 AM Subject: RE: Unable to update public free/busy data. | That's just them opening someone else's (or a resource) calendar. | | -Original Message- | From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:45 | To: Exchange Discussions | Subject: Unable to update public free/busy data. | | | Exchange 2000 SP? version 6.0.6375.0 (on Windows 2000 SP4), Outlook 2002 SP2 | + All Security Updates on Win 2000 Pro & XP Pro | | We have a number of users who are reporting that when they exit from Outlook | 2002 they get the following warning message: | | "Unable to update public free/busy data. You do not have sufficent | permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact | or your system administrator." | | Other users have reported getting the same error at random intervals | thoughout the day (likely when some background synchronization is taking | place -- or so I suspect). | | The Exchange Server is not local. It is located in another state and | accessed over a 4xT1 WAN link. I do not personally have access to the | Exchange Server (maddening for an ex-ExchAdmin like myself), but do have | contacts who are. | | Can anyone provide insight as to what "object" is being referenced and/or | what steps can be taken to eliminate the error? My research to date has not | produced any solutions. | | Mucho Appreciato. | | Steven A. Christensen | Sr. Network Engineer | USPS Topeka MDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to update public free/busy data.
That's just them opening someone else's (or a resource) calendar. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to update public free/busy data. Exchange 2000 SP? version 6.0.6375.0 (on Windows 2000 SP4), Outlook 2002 SP2 + All Security Updates on Win 2000 Pro & XP Pro We have a number of users who are reporting that when they exit from Outlook 2002 they get the following warning message: "Unable to update public free/busy data. You do not have sufficent permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact or your system administrator." Other users have reported getting the same error at random intervals thoughout the day (likely when some background synchronization is taking place -- or so I suspect). The Exchange Server is not local. It is located in another state and accessed over a 4xT1 WAN link. I do not personally have access to the Exchange Server (maddening for an ex-ExchAdmin like myself), but do have contacts who are. Can anyone provide insight as to what "object" is being referenced and/or what steps can be taken to eliminate the error? My research to date has not produced any solutions. Mucho Appreciato. Steven A. Christensen Sr. Network Engineer USPS Topeka MDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unable to update public free/busy data.
Exchange 2000 SP? version 6.0.6375.0 (on Windows 2000 SP4), Outlook 2002 SP2 + All Security Updates on Win 2000 Pro & XP Pro We have a number of users who are reporting that when they exit from Outlook 2002 they get the following warning message: "Unable to update public free/busy data. You do not have sufficent permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact or your system administrator." Other users have reported getting the same error at random intervals thoughout the day (likely when some background synchronization is taking place -- or so I suspect). The Exchange Server is not local. It is located in another state and accessed over a 4xT1 WAN link. I do not personally have access to the Exchange Server (maddening for an ex-ExchAdmin like myself), but do have contacts who are. Can anyone provide insight as to what "object" is being referenced and/or what steps can be taken to eliminate the error? My research to date has not produced any solutions. Mucho Appreciato. Steven A. Christensen Sr. Network Engineer USPS Topeka MDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
Thanks Chris for the clarification. :) Samantha -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Just to be semantically correct, POP servers don't receive mail, they listen for client requests related to retrieving mail via a POP3 enabled client. SMTP servers receive mail, they then either deliver it locally or forward it to another host. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:13 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Exchange 2000 I have a POP server that receives mail and forwards to @exmail.macombisd.org addresses on the Exchange server. All accounts on the exchange server have two SMTP addresses (1. @exmail.macombisd.org and @misd.net) (The @misd.net is the POP server it goes through first) All forwarding mail from the POP server works fine. Just when I send from yahoo or advnet.net I get the bounce. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Which version of Exchange please. Do you have a gateway sitting in front of your Exchange server, or does Exchange receive mail directly from the Internet. Do you have @exmail.macombisd.org assigned as a domain you accept mail for? Assigned as an e-mail address? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:59 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: Help - Relay?? Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
Just to be semantically correct, POP servers don't receive mail, they listen for client requests related to retrieving mail via a POP3 enabled client. SMTP servers receive mail, they then either deliver it locally or forward it to another host. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:13 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Exchange 2000 I have a POP server that receives mail and forwards to @exmail.macombisd.org addresses on the Exchange server. All accounts on the exchange server have two SMTP addresses (1. @exmail.macombisd.org and @misd.net) (The @misd.net is the POP server it goes through first) All forwarding mail from the POP server works fine. Just when I send from yahoo or advnet.net I get the bounce. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Which version of Exchange please. Do you have a gateway sitting in front of your Exchange server, or does Exchange receive mail directly from the Internet. Do you have @exmail.macombisd.org assigned as a domain you accept mail for? Assigned as an e-mail address? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:59 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: Help - Relay?? Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
Thanks guysI will talk to my PIX guy. :) Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Then What TOm suggested maybe the problem. I have had 5.7.1 relay errors happen when MailGuard has been switched on at a PIX Firewall that was in the loop. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:09:52 -0400 Hi Tony and thanks for the reply. I also have a Advnet.net account that gets the same bounce when sending directly to the Exchange server (@exmail.macombisd.org). Our DNS points exmail.macombisd.org to 64.88.83.251. The reverse DNS lookup points to xmail1 (name of the server). Hope this makes some kind of sense. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help - Relay?? All email from Yahoo or just the one account. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
Exchange 2000 I have a POP server that receives mail and forwards to @exmail.macombisd.org addresses on the Exchange server. All accounts on the exchange server have two SMTP addresses (1. @exmail.macombisd.org and @misd.net) (The @misd.net is the POP server it goes through first) All forwarding mail from the POP server works fine. Just when I send from yahoo or advnet.net I get the bounce. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Which version of Exchange please. Do you have a gateway sitting in front of your Exchange server, or does Exchange receive mail directly from the Internet. Do you have @exmail.macombisd.org assigned as a domain you accept mail for? Assigned as an e-mail address? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:59 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: Help - Relay?? Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
Then What TOm suggested maybe the problem. I have had 5.7.1 relay errors happen when MailGuard has been switched on at a PIX Firewall that was in the loop. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:09:52 -0400 Hi Tony and thanks for the reply. I also have a Advnet.net account that gets the same bounce when sending directly to the Exchange server (@exmail.macombisd.org). Our DNS points exmail.macombisd.org to 64.88.83.251. The reverse DNS lookup points to xmail1 (name of the server). Hope this makes some kind of sense. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help - Relay?? All email from Yahoo or just the one account. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hang up in exchange 5.5
If your working with PSS then your in good hands. But if it is one box then maybe rebuild it if all others are OK. From: "michael la bara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: hang up in exchange 5.5 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:20:39 -0700 in outlook xp (2002) there is a box that pops up saying that "it is pinging the exchange server for the required information" i constantly comes up.. have taken all procedures that microsoft has recommended. any ideas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service FREE for one month. Limited time offer-- sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
Hi Tony and thanks for the reply. I also have a Advnet.net account that gets the same bounce when sending directly to the Exchange server (@exmail.macombisd.org). Our DNS points exmail.macombisd.org to 64.88.83.251. The reverse DNS lookup points to xmail1 (name of the server). Hope this makes some kind of sense. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help - Relay?? All email from Yahoo or just the one account. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
Which version of Exchange please. Do you have a gateway sitting in front of your Exchange server, or does Exchange receive mail directly from the Internet. Do you have @exmail.macombisd.org assigned as a domain you accept mail for? Assigned as an e-mail address? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:59 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: Help - Relay?? Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
telnet exmail.macombisd.org 25 gives you: 220 **0*2*** *22*200***2*00*0***0*00 You first have a question for Macomb ISD's PIX administrator. First order of business: turn off the stupid Mailguard feature. no fixup protocol smtp 25. Then get him or her to look at why the pix is refusing your traffic. -tom > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:59 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Help - Relay?? > Subject: Help - Relay?? > > > Hello > > This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the > exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send > to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Giving up on 64.88.83.251. > > Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? > > Thanks > > Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help - Relay??
All email from Yahoo or just the one account. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help - Relay??
Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
Well, truth be told, I don't like the backup part either. When I was forced to use it, the backup throughput was pretty slow. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:17 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Brick Level Backup Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Be sure to tell us how well the restore goes... It's not that we don't like it because it doesn't backup; it has a serious problem with restoring... -Original Message- From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Why is everyone against ARCserve? I have been using ARCserve v. 9.01 to do brick level backups and I have never have a problem with it. The largest mailbox that I do a brick level backup on is 729megs and most of the mailboxes are over 100megs. I have never had a failed job and I have done successful restores. I would have to say the ARCserve 9.01 is a solid product it is a 200% improvement over ARCserve 7. The only bad thing I can say is that it is a little on the expensive side, but I use it to backup 6 servers and 3 databases. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hang up in exchange 5.5
in outlook xp (2002) there is a box that pops up saying that "it is pinging the exchange server for the required information" i constantly comes up.. have taken all procedures that microsoft has recommended. any ideas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hang up in exchange 5.5
"The outlook program from time to time has hangups that cause this popup box to appear." What pop up box ??? From: "michael la bara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: hang up in exchange 5.5 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 07:24:17 -0700 i have exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a windows ntserver sp6a. it is a 731 mhz pent !!! with 785 mb ram. the user has a pent 3 733mhz percision wkst with 512mb ram and win2k and office xp sp2 The problem is that i have been having hangups with the server as to this particualar user and only this user. The outlook program from time to time has hangups that cause this popup box to appear. When this box appers it causes the whole program to hang up. i have disabled anti virus and any other 3rd party programs to see if there is a conflict but w/ no resolution. i have also done a trace mon perf mon and sysmon to see if there are any performance issues. microsoft has no clear cut answer for me as to what is causeing the problem. if anyone has had this problem please help me thank you in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hang up in exchange 5.5
i have exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a windows ntserver sp6a. it is a 731 mhz pent !!! with 785 mb ram. the user has a pent 3 733mhz percision wkst with 512mb ram and win2k and office xp sp2 The problem is that i have been having hangups with the server as to this particualar user and only this user. The outlook program from time to time has hangups that cause this popup box to appear. When this box appers it causes the whole program to hang up. i have disabled anti virus and any other 3rd party programs to see if there is a conflict but w/ no resolution. i have also done a trace mon perf mon and sysmon to see if there are any performance issues. microsoft has no clear cut answer for me as to what is causeing the problem. if anyone has had this problem please help me thank you in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
Look people, he's out of the comp copies of his book. Either ping Greg offline, or go buy the darned book. It's only twelve bucks US$! http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0595289703 -tom [ various "me too" responses snipped] > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List > > [ ] > > I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 > responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will > accept this > challenge and the rest of the "pompous bags of gas" will be > exposed for > what they are. [ ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-mail Transference
In Exchange 5.5 forward to a custom recipient and forward to a contact in 2000. From: "Zeng, LiDao CSPCL-?" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: E-mail Transference Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:21:03 +0800 Folks, Can somebody give me a hand? How can I do some setting on Exchange Server for transfer the user's incoming E-mail to another E-mail address. Thanks for any input. Adao _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service FREE for one month. Limited time offer-- sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail Transference
Folks, Can somebody give me a hand? How can I do some setting on Exchange Server for transfer the user's incoming E-mail to another E-mail address. Thanks for any input. Adao _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup
What? From: "Gonzalez, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:23:22 -0400 Well it's over dialup and we don't pass anything other than IP over it so I don't think it's that. We can try it though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions RPC Binding order in the registry? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any responses. We have reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clients to an OST over dialup. For some reason it is very slow. Now when they sync it over broadband it takes about 30 seconds. When they sync it over dialup even after a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband or lan line, it takes about 2 hours. This doesn't make sense. I know the connection is faster but I don't think that's it. They don't have anything to sync. I have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck. Is there like a reg key or something that I can change to make this faster. We need to stick to OST files because we have public folders and calendars that need to be online. We are also using EX2000 SP3 if that matters but I think this is more Outlook than Exchange. Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message during games with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
Intel bought them for next to nothing. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Yeah, I remember them in my mainframe days, we used them for our remote access. Like'em, I thought they sold out. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 September 2003 22:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security I couldn't tell you. Our dialup consists of dialing to what essentially is a world-wide ISP, then firing up a Nortel VPN client. The Nortel client is apparently pretty tightly integrated with SecurID - I'm assuming it uses the "native" SecurID API for authentication. I remember in the old days, when we used Shivas[1] for remote access we had the same problem. The Shivas were limited to using Tacacs to talk to SecurID. Tacacs didn't have provisions for querying the user for more information (next token, new PIN, etc), so these features didn't work. Then Shiva added Tacacs+, which DID allow for querying the user, and life was good. You will need to look at what protocol your authentication mechanism is using to talk to SecurID and see if you can come up with something that supports querying the user. [1] Anyone remember Shiva? I'm constantly amazed at how a company could literally own the remote access market, then manage to lose everything in such a short period of time. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Ken / Roger, I know it's OT, but I have a quick question for you two. We don't have a VPN option here, but we have ~50 users using the tokens for dial-in. Occasionally, their tokens will get out of sync and of course, lock them out after three successive tries. As Ken indicated, if the user is two codes ahead or behind, it will put your token in "Next-Token" mode and is supposed to prompt you onscreen. However, our users never see the Next-Token notification on their end. Why? Is it because they are using Win9x/ME on their end or is it because of something on the server end? Server is NT 4 SP6a in an NT4 domain. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security It really is a cool system. We're currently using it for VPN access and front ending OWA, and we're playing with it and some Cisco Aironet wireless devices - requiring SecurID authentication before you get onto the wireless network. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:21 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > I've not examined the system for several years (I'm just a happy user > now, not and admin), but at least at one time SecurID would accept the > current code (of course),one code behind or one ahead for a total > window of 3 minutes as Roger notes. > > If the gadget's clock had drifted to more than one minute off, and you > were TWO codes ahead or behind, the system would additionally prompt > for the NEXT code displayed to make sure you were you, and it would > update the stored time offset for your gadget. Pretty slick system. > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:01 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > Actually, you've got the system down correctly. > > However, the slack time is +/- 1 minute, so you really get 3 minutes > per code. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:29 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > > > > Forgive me for arguing, but I believe the time alloted for guessing > > that third factor is even less than indicated below. Of course, by > > token, I am referring to what RSA calls a "keyfob." Is that what > > you are referring to > > as well? > > > > Here is what I understand to be the process, from reading the > > manuals we > > have: > > 1. Upon issuance to the user, you synch the token/keyfob with the > > the RSA server DB. > > 2. A 6-digi
RE: Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup
Well it's over dialup and we don't pass anything other than IP over it so I don't think it's that. We can try it though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions RPC Binding order in the registry? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any responses. We have reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clients to an OST over dialup. For some reason it is very slow. Now when they sync it over broadband it takes about 30 seconds. When they sync it over dialup even after a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband or lan line, it takes about 2 hours. This doesn't make sense. I know the connection is faster but I don't think that's it. They don't have anything to sync. I have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck. Is there like a reg key or something that I can change to make this faster. We need to stick to OST files because we have public folders and calendars that need to be online. We are also using EX2000 SP3 if that matters but I think this is more Outlook than Exchange. Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Have you read the description of how the virus works? > -Original Message- > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 22 September 2003 13:41 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Ok, but I checked all my servers, they're clean, scanmail is > up to date and functionning, why am I getting those emails > from [EMAIL PROTECTED] then? > Kim > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:30 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Wasn't this a sign of either the Mimail or Blaster virus a > few weeks ago that it would send email using the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? > > Nate Couch > EDS Messaging > > > -- > > From: Kim Schotanus > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 7:19 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject:RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; > > boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b" > > X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: message/delivery-status > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > > > > Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be > with Microsoft > > > SMTPSVC; > > Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > > thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== > > Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action > > taken. > > From: > > Sender: > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. > > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="utf-8" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 > > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > > Importance: normal > > Priority: normal > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) > > FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] > > > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- > > > > Kind regards, > > Kim Schotanus > > === > > Kim Schotanus > > Information Systems Manager > > > > INTAS > > Avenue des Arts 58 > > B-1000 Brussels > > Belgium > > > > T. +32 2 549 01 11 > > F. +32 2 549 01 56 > > > > === > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Mongo check headers. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM > > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > I'm getting more and more virusses coming from > [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have > > > no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot > > trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? > > > > kim > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?> enter=exchange&text_mode > > =& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?> enter=exchange&text_mode > > =& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?> enter=exchange&text_mode > > =&la > > ng=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
RE: Location of public folders for WebDAV
I think it is this - \\.\BackOfficeStorage\your.domain.name.com\Public Folders -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Location of public folders for WebDAV I'm playing around with WebDAV as a way to get data out of public folders. However, I am unable to find a reference as to what form the URLs should take. I've seen a number of examples, but they are almost all for individual mailboxes, and all differ. What would be the root of the public folder tree as far as WebDAV is concerned? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Can I block it or is that not a good idea? Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because that address is being spoofed by someone else. Nate > -- > From: Kim Schotanus > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 7:41 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ok, but I checked all my servers, they're clean, scanmail is up to > date and functionning, why am I getting those emails from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] then? Kim > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:30 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Wasn't this a sign of either the Mimail or Blaster virus a few weeks > ago that it would send email using the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? > > Nate Couch > EDS Messaging > > > -- > > From: Kim Schotanus > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 7:19 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject:RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; > > boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b" > > X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: message/delivery-status > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > > > > Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be with > > Microsoft > > > SMTPSVC; > > Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > > thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== > > Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action > > taken. > > From: > > Sender: > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. > > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="utf-8" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 > > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > > Importance: normal > > Priority: normal > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) > > FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] > > > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- > > > > Kind regards, > > Kim Schotanus > > === > > Kim Schotanus > > Information Systems Manager > > > > INTAS > > Avenue des Arts 58 > > B-1000 Brussels > > Belgium > > > > T. +32 2 549 01 11 > > F. +32 2 549 01 56 > > > > === > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Mongo check headers. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM > > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we > > have > > > no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot > > trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? > > > > kim > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
On second thought, find another person to review your book. I won't be around long enough to complete it. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: John Matteson Posted At: Sunday, September 21, 2003 12:49 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: A CHALLENGE to the List Subject: RE: A CHALLENGE to the List I'll take you up on the challenge. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:23 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: A CHALLENGE to the List Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem attacks on myself and Achieving Process Profitability: Building the IT Profit Center without ever even reading a single page of it. I have been in contact with Amazon.com so these "reviews" will be removed in the near future. I could take this opportunity to opine about how unprofessional, unfair, childish and cowardly this is, but instead I offer this challenge: I will send you a copy of my Achieving Process Profitability at my own expense for you to review. All that I ask in return is that you actually read Achieving Process Profitability and post an honest, impartial review of it's contents, not your personal prejudices, to Amazon.com and this list. I will only respond to indivuals that publicly accept my challenge on this list, just respond to this message and then privately email me your name and address. I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the "pompous bags of gas" will be exposed for what they are. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Because that address is being spoofed by someone else. Nate > -- > From: Kim Schotanus > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 7:41 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ok, but I checked all my servers, they're clean, scanmail is up to date > and functionning, why am I getting those emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > then? > Kim > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:30 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Wasn't this a sign of either the Mimail or Blaster virus a few weeks ago > that it would send email using the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? > > Nate Couch > EDS Messaging > > > -- > > From: Kim Schotanus > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 7:19 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject:RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; > > boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b" > > X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: message/delivery-status > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > > > > Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft > > > SMTPSVC; > > Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > > thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== > > Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action > > taken. > > From: > > Sender: > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. > > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="utf-8" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 > > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > > Importance: normal > > Priority: normal > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) > > FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] > > > > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- > > > > Kind regards, > > Kim Schotanus > > === > > Kim Schotanus > > Information Systems Manager > > > > INTAS > > Avenue des Arts 58 > > B-1000 Brussels > > Belgium > > > > T. +32 2 549 01 11 > > F. +32 2 549 01 56 > > > > === > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Mongo check headers. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM > > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have > > > no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot > > trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? > > > > kim > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =&la > > ng=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/ly
RE: admin@...
Ok, but I checked all my servers, they're clean, scanmail is up to date and functionning, why am I getting those emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] then? Kim -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wasn't this a sign of either the Mimail or Blaster virus a few weeks ago that it would send email using the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Kim Schotanus > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 7:19 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; > boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b" > X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > Content-Type: message/delivery-status > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > > Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft > SMTPSVC; >Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== > Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action > taken. > From: > Sender: > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > Importance: normal > Priority: normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) > FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- > > Kind regards, > Kim Schotanus > === > Kim Schotanus > Information Systems Manager > > INTAS > Avenue des Arts 58 > B-1000 Brussels > Belgium > > T. +32 2 549 01 11 > F. +32 2 549 01 56 > > === > > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Mongo check headers. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi there, > > I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have > no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot > trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? > > kim > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup
RPC Binding order in the registry? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any responses. We have reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clients to an OST over dialup. For some reason it is very slow. Now when they sync it over broadband it takes about 30 seconds. When they sync it over dialup even after a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband or lan line, it takes about 2 hours. This doesn't make sense. I know the connection is faster but I don't think that's it. They don't have anything to sync. I have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck. Is there like a reg key or something that I can change to make this faster. We need to stick to OST files because we have public folders and calendars that need to be online. We are also using EX2000 SP3 if that matters but I think this is more Outlook than Exchange. Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Wasn't this a sign of either the Mimail or Blaster virus a few weeks ago that it would send email using the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Kim Schotanus > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 7:19 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; > boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b" > X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > Content-Type: message/delivery-status > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > > Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft > SMTPSVC; >Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== > Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. > From: > Sender: > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > Importance: normal > Priority: normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) > FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] > > > --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- > > Kind regards, > Kim Schotanus > === > Kim Schotanus > Information Systems Manager > > INTAS > Avenue des Arts 58 > B-1000 Brussels > Belgium > > T. +32 2 549 01 11 > F. +32 2 549 01 56 > > === > > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Mongo check headers. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi there, > > I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have > no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace > where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? > > kim > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup
I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any responses. We have reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clients to an OST over dialup. For some reason it is very slow. Now when they sync it over broadband it takes about 30 seconds. When they sync it over dialup even after a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband or lan line, it takes about 2 hours. This doesn't make sense. I know the connection is faster but I don't think that's it. They don't have anything to sync. I have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck. Is there like a reg key or something that I can change to make this faster. We need to stick to OST files because we have public folders and calendars that need to be online. We are also using EX2000 SP3 if that matters but I think this is more Outlook than Exchange. Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Kim, This is the Mimail virus - The headers tell you that Scanmail is picking it up. Looks like it's doing it's job fine - Be happy! Mike -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b" X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. From: Sender: To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mongo check headers. - Original Message - From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b" X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. From: Sender: To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mongo check headers. - Original Message - From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
Greg - I'm in Fenton Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem attacks on myself and Achieving Process Profitability: Building the IT Profit Center without ever even reading a single page of it. I have been in contact with Amazon.com so these "reviews" will be removed in the near future. I could take this opportunity to opine about how unprofessional, unfair, childish and cowardly this is, but instead I offer this challenge: I will send you a copy of my Achieving Process Profitability at my own expense for you to review. All that I ask in return is that you actually read Achieving Process Profitability and post an honest, impartial review of it's contents, not your personal prejudices, to Amazon.com and this list. I will only respond to indivuals that publicly accept my challenge on this list, just respond to this message and then privately email me your name and address. I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the "pompous bags of gas" will be exposed for what they are. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: admin@...
Mongo check headers. - Original Message - From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detailed logon process for Outlook
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 Hi all, I am looking for information for the logon procedure of Outlook 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 mailbox. We are adding permissions to our mailboxes for our new AD domain, but some Outlook clients are getting prompted for their username and password. I want to be able to log the logon process for Outlook to see where the problem is occurring I am currently using emsmdb32.dll debug version to collect RPC information. How does Outlook authenticate the user account with the mailbox? Is it the Exchange server that does the lookup on a DC with the past credentials from Outlook? How can I monitor this process? TIA, Paul Bendall ___ Operational Integrity eMessaging London Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein ___ Tel: +44 20 747 52869 Mobile: +44 7989 706 881 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Kim, Sounds like Mimail virus - http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2003-02.html has the gory details. I suggest you update your anti-virus protection, this has been around for a while. Regards, Mike Scott -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:] Sent: 22 September 2003 10:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
admin@...
Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
Yeah, I remember them in my mainframe days, we used them for our remote access. Like'em, I thought they sold out. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 September 2003 22:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security I couldn't tell you. Our dialup consists of dialing to what essentially is a world-wide ISP, then firing up a Nortel VPN client. The Nortel client is apparently pretty tightly integrated with SecurID - I'm assuming it uses the "native" SecurID API for authentication. I remember in the old days, when we used Shivas[1] for remote access we had the same problem. The Shivas were limited to using Tacacs to talk to SecurID. Tacacs didn't have provisions for querying the user for more information (next token, new PIN, etc), so these features didn't work. Then Shiva added Tacacs+, which DID allow for querying the user, and life was good. You will need to look at what protocol your authentication mechanism is using to talk to SecurID and see if you can come up with something that supports querying the user. [1] Anyone remember Shiva? I'm constantly amazed at how a company could literally own the remote access market, then manage to lose everything in such a short period of time. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Ken / Roger, I know it's OT, but I have a quick question for you two. We don't have a VPN option here, but we have ~50 users using the tokens for dial-in. Occasionally, their tokens will get out of sync and of course, lock them out after three successive tries. As Ken indicated, if the user is two codes ahead or behind, it will put your token in "Next-Token" mode and is supposed to prompt you onscreen. However, our users never see the Next-Token notification on their end. Why? Is it because they are using Win9x/ME on their end or is it because of something on the server end? Server is NT 4 SP6a in an NT4 domain. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security It really is a cool system. We're currently using it for VPN access and front ending OWA, and we're playing with it and some Cisco Aironet wireless devices - requiring SecurID authentication before you get onto the wireless network. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:21 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > I've not examined the system for several years (I'm just a happy user > now, not and admin), but at least at one time SecurID would accept the > current code (of course),one code behind or one ahead for a total > window of 3 minutes as Roger notes. > > If the gadget's clock had drifted to more than one minute off, and you > were TWO codes ahead or behind, the system would additionally prompt > for the NEXT code displayed to make sure you were you, and it would > update the stored time offset for your gadget. Pretty slick system. > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:01 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > Actually, you've got the system down correctly. > > However, the slack time is +/- 1 minute, so you really get 3 minutes > per code. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:29 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security > > > > > > Forgive me for arguing, but I believe the time alloted for guessing > > that third factor is even less than indicated below. Of course, > > by token, I am > > referring to what RSA calls a "keyfob." Is that what you are > > referring to > > as well? > > > > Here is what I understand to be the process, from reading the > > manuals we > > have: > > 1. Upon issuance to the user, you synch the token/keyfob > > with the the RSA > > server DB. > > 2. A 6-digit code displays for 1 minute on the token. > > 3. If used for authentication within that 1 minute period, it is > > "time-stamped" as to when you entered the Passcode (PIN + > > code) and has an > > additional 1 minute latency period
RE: Exchange and SAN
Dan, Hey, you run a tight ship then (65GB / 16,000+ mailboxes) ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Daniel Foerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 September 2003 05:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange and SAN I run 2 Exchange 2000 Enterprise servers on an HP EVA2 SAN. Each server has a 65GB IS right now and a 2GB Public IS. 16,000+ mailboxes total. I have seen no issues since migrating from our 5.5 environment 1 month ago to 2000 and moving away from direct attached SCSI disk environment. The big difference I have notice is that backups are faster because our Tape Unit is attached to the SAN as well and can be shared by both servers. -dan foerst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
Ditto from the United Kingdom Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 September 2003 23:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: A CHALLENGE to the List I see the 10 to 12 looks like its gone, but I would be happy to accept your challenge should you want a non-USA review of your book. regards Dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/09/2003 8:23:27 a.m. >>> Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem attacks on myself and Achieving Process Profitability: Building the IT Profit Center without ever even reading a single page of it. I have been in contact with Amazon.com so these "reviews" will be removed in the near future. I could take this opportunity to opine about how unprofessional, unfair, childish and cowardly this is, but instead I offer this challenge: I will send you a copy of my Achieving Process Profitability at my own expense for you to review. All that I ask in return is that you actually read Achieving Process Profitability and post an honest, impartial review of it's contents, not your personal prejudices, to Amazon.com and this list. I will only respond to indivuals that publicly accept my challenge on this list, just respond to this message and then privately email me your name and address. I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the "pompous bags of gas" will be exposed for what they are. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
