Strange Calendar Behaviour
Hi All, Hopefully, someone has seen this before and there is a simple fix I'm using EX5.5 One of my users decided to give a Distribution List 'Editor' permissions to his calendar. When the next person sent him a meeting invite, it went to both him and the DL. He then removed the permissions, but the DL still gets sent his meeting invites. This was several days ago, and it is still occurring. Can anyone give me a tip or two on how to stop this? Thanks Nick The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential and may be legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the addressee, dissemination, copying or other use of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. No contract may be construed by this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Calendar Behaviour
Check and see if the DL is listed as a delegate. ToolsOptionsdelegates. Just remove it and you should be OK. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Field Posted At: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:51 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Strange Calendar Behaviour Subject: Strange Calendar Behaviour Hi All, Hopefully, someone has seen this before and there is a simple fix I'm using EX5.5 One of my users decided to give a Distribution List 'Editor' permissions to his calendar. When the next person sent him a meeting invite, it went to both him and the DL. He then removed the permissions, but the DL still gets sent his meeting invites. This was several days ago, and it is still occurring. Can anyone give me a tip or two on how to stop this? Thanks Nick The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential and may be legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the addressee, dissemination, copying or other use of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. No contract may be construed by this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Calendar Behaviour
Thanks Jeff - that worked a treat. (Why is it always the simple things that get overlooked?) Nick -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 October 2003 10:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Calendar Behaviour Check and see if the DL is listed as a delegate. ToolsOptionsdelegates. Just remove it and you should be OK. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Field Posted At: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:51 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Strange Calendar Behaviour Subject: Strange Calendar Behaviour Hi All, Hopefully, someone has seen this before and there is a simple fix I'm using EX5.5 One of my users decided to give a Distribution List 'Editor' permissions to his calendar. When the next person sent him a meeting invite, it went to both him and the DL. He then removed the permissions, but the DL still gets sent his meeting invites. This was several days ago, and it is still occurring. Can anyone give me a tip or two on how to stop this? Thanks Nick The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential and may be legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the addressee, dissemination, copying or other use of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. No contract may be construed by this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message comes to inbox and disappears again
Hi, twice today I receive a mail in my inbox and then it disappears again. The messages is coming from my own email address and the subject says: My-Exchange-Server-Name - 10-13-2003 10-13-24-894ms any idea what that is? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RPC over HTTP - username/password are refused
Hi there ! I have tried to set up RPC over HTTP Server1 = Win2K3 and Exchange 2003 Server2 = Win2K3 (GC) Client = WinXP and Outlook 2003 (from my home location) I looks like everything work - but when i make a profile and try to connect to the exchange server the username/password are refused. I have SSL on the Exchange server. I have configured the RPC over HTTP try guidelines in Exchange 2003 Deployment Guide, ie. the webserver - configurations in regedit on both the exchange server and global catalog server. AnyOne have any idea on where to look for the error - that my username/password are refused from the client. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS
There is no problem that cannot be solved by the proper application of sufficient quantities of high explosives. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:49 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Subject: RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS There are seldom good technological solutions to theological problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be with you all. We are a non profit organisation resides in part of Afica. Our organisation's name is Moses's Hand Foundation. We've decided to erased child abuse and some other things which make the youths to be idles. Our recent research made us to realised that many youths in Africa were initiated to be a frauders, they don't have any good intention or any room for the Lord in their hearts. When you asked them, they have some reasons which might be genuine in their own eyes but in God's eyes there are no excuse. This Foundation now decided to stand on it's feet believing that it will get a good support from International countries to say no to Child Abuse and change the mind of youths for Christ. We decided to have a National Seminars for youth and some other programmes that will make these youths to know that if they can study and work and trust God they can do good in the land by not stealing or do frauding all around. Brethen, we need your assistance, either in monetary terms or materials. Your assistance may be some christian books that we can give these people after this program. whatsoever. Let's join hands to say no child abuse in any form, prostitutions and stealing and frauding in any form. Remember that our Moses needed somebody to raise his hand so that victory can be sure. We shall be glad to read from you if you want to assist us financially or materially.you can visit us online at www.hopealive.wsmcafe.com Shalom Best Regards Bro. John Smith _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spam: False Positives
GFI ME8 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spam: False Positives What are you using as your spam filter app? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spam: False Positives I'm curious how people on the list are address the issues of falso positives. Our CIO under pressure actually came down and forced us to turn off our spam filter cause of false positive complaints. Of course perception and reality are two different things in these cases. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message comes to inbox and disappears again
Verify that you are delivering to your Exchange server mailbox and not a .pst. Samantha -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 6:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message comes to inbox and disappears again Hi, twice today I receive a mail in my inbox and then it disappears again. The messages is coming from my own email address and the subject says: My-Exchange-Server-Name - 10-13-2003 10-13-24-894ms any idea what that is? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003
Exchange Svr 2003 Deployment Guide CH4 pg 49 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Sure you can, just not in-place. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 You can not go directly to E2K3 from Exchange 5.5. IIRC From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:54:18 -0400 I don't think you will be able to find a definitive answer to this, but IMO, I wouldn't use the 2003 ADC to migrate 5.5 to E2k. There seems to be a lot going on here: W2003 domain, E2k and E2003 servers, migration from 5.5 etc.. Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with it after testing in the lab, and forget the E2k bit entirely? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Just upgraded a domain from Windows NT to Windows 2003. Our next phase will migrate Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 with some users going to Exchange 2003 (so it can be proven as a viable endpoint for the migration) using the Move Mailbox method. If I use the ADC for Exchange 2003, does anyone know if there are any gotcha's moving mailboxes from the Exchange 5.5 server to the Exchange 2000 server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS
If brute force isn't working for you, chances are, you aren't using enough of it. Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers! John Matteson wrote: There is no problem that cannot be solved by the proper application of sufficient quantities of high explosives. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:49 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Subject: RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS There are seldom good technological solutions to theological problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be with you all. We are a non profit organisation resides in part of Afica. Our organisation's name is Moses's Hand Foundation. We've decided to erased child abuse and some other things which make the youths to be idles. Our recent research made us to realised that many youths in Africa were initiated to be a frauders, they don't have any good intention or any room for the Lord in their hearts. When you asked them, they have some reasons which might be genuine in their own eyes but in God's eyes there are no excuse. This Foundation now decided to stand on it's feet believing that it will get a good support from International countries to say no to Child Abuse and change the mind of youths for Christ. We decided to have a National Seminars for youth and some other programmes that will make these youths to know that if they can study and work and trust God they can do good in the land by not stealing or do frauding all around. Brethen, we need your assistance, either in monetary terms or materials. Your assistance may be some christian books that we can give these people after this program. whatsoever. Let's join hands to say no child abuse in any form, prostitutions and stealing and frauding in any form. Remember that our Moses needed somebody to raise his hand so that victory can be sure. We shall be glad to read from you if you want to assist us financially or materially.you can visit us online at www.hopealive.wsmcafe.com Shalom Best Regards Bro. John Smith _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000
Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder security settings we want in place for our users. We've changed them to Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public site. Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes back to the defaults that came with Exchange. Additionally, it seems to lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive), but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds it. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000
Make sure you make the changes in Exchange System Manager, and not IIS Manager, otherwise they'll be overwritten by a sub-process of the System Attendant called DS2MB. As for the red icons, that's a benign error: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=259373 Neil -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 13 October 2003 15:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Subject: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder security settings we want in place for our users. We've changed them to Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public site. Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes back to the defaults that came with Exchange. Additionally, it seems to lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive), but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds it. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
2000 or 5.5? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 2:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
LDIFDE will help you Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 10:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address Exchange 2000. regards Uso - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:30 PM Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address Which version of Exchange? From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:24:37 +0400 Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get McAfee virus scanning and cleaning of incoming attachments. Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000
Red error icon is OK. There is a way to permanently set up the authentication for the default web site, so that it will not revert to the original settings. I can't remember off the top of my head, it is done by running an IISadmin VB script from command line. It is described in the Exchange 2000 Hosting white papers. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder security settings we want in place for our users. We've changed them to Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public site. Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes back to the defaults that came with Exchange. Additionally, it seems to lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive), but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds it. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
Last week, I applied the newest pst SP3 fixes (KB824282 - Exchange 2000Server
Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup) to our Exchange servers (one is in a child domain).
Everything worked fine that day until about midnight when I started getting tons of
e-mails saying something like the following:
Multiple edits have been made to Jane Doe. The conflicting edits have been attached
to a conflict message in Cmpy Phonebook. Conflicting edits have been made to the
same item. To resolve this conflict, select the item in the list below you wish to
keep and then choose Keep This Item, or choose Keep All to preserve all the
versions.
If you go into the eventviewer, you sees tons of errors like the ones shown at the
bottom. When it does this store.exe pegs the CPU at the child site to 100%. You also
end up with tons of messages in two SMTP queues at the child site:
1. PreSubmissionQueue (Messages pending submission)
2. WRGLE Routing (Routing Group Connector - Remote delivery)
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Conflicts
Event ID: 3067
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
An item conflict occurred in public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Cmpy Phonebook
.
Message ID: c-2B5D
From: ---
Subject: P H H
Received: 12/22/1999 8:47:34 PM
Database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (DOG).
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Backfill
Event ID: 3073
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
A backfill request (-1 of 69) for public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Parks
Cmpy Phonebook
was removed from server
/o=CAT/ou=Food2/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FOOD2SV/cn=Microsoft Public
MDB.
CNSET:{0}
CNSET FAI:
21-14B5342,21-14B5344
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Yes -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address 2000 or 5.5? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 2:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vicodin, pain medication available
VICODIN Pain Reliever Pills Now Available... *NO Prescription Required *Next-day shipping *Lowest Price Guaranteed *Other Potent drugs available including SOMA, HYDROCODONE, LEVITRA and more... http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/medical take off list http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
that answer is valid. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address Yes -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address 2000 or 5.5? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 2:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vicodin, pain medication available
Hello, Swynk? Anyone home? -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available take off list http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000
Correction: Red error icon is not necessarily a problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Red error icon is OK. There is a way to permanently set up the authentication for the default web site, so that it will not revert to the original settings. I can't remember off the top of my head, it is done by running an IISadmin VB script from command line. It is described in the Exchange 2000 Hosting white papers. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder security settings we want in place for our users. We've changed them to Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public site. Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes back to the defaults that came with Exchange. Additionally, it seems to lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive), but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds it. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vicodin, pain medication available
I was shocked to find that someone is actually there; he helped me get this address subscribed properly. Contact him at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (as noted at the bottom of every message posted herein). Thank you Listadmin! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Vicodin, pain medication available Hello, Swynk? Anyone home? -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vicodin, pain medication available
I'm not sure about this one... This is almost on topic. Ever met an Exchange Admin that didn't need a good dose of Vicodin to make it through the day? j/k Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, Swynk? Anyone home? -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available take off list http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vicodin, pain medication available
Too true. -Original Message- From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Vicodin, pain medication available I'm not sure about this one... This is almost on topic. Ever met an Exchange Admin that didn't need a good dose of Vicodin to make it through the day? j/k Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, Swynk? Anyone home? -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available take off list http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vicodin, pain medication available
Yes Sir, Mr. Crackhoe. -Original Message- From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Vicodin, pain medication available I'm not sure about this one... This is almost on topic. Ever met an Exchange Admin that didn't need a good dose of Vicodin to make it through the day? j/k Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, Swynk? Anyone home? -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available take off list http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Routing
All, We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All other offices range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... and then 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office can send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 connectors. Any thoughts? TIA, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
How are your AD sites configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing All, We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All other offices range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... and then 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office can send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 connectors. Any thoughts? TIA, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
You don't have a product called Outlook Helpdesk from www.kalmstrom.nu set
up in your PF's by chance, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server
Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
Last week, I applied the newest pst SP3 fixes (KB824282 - Exchange
2000Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup) to our Exchange servers (one is in a
child domain). Everything worked fine that day until about midnight when I
started getting tons of e-mails saying something like the following:
Multiple edits have been made to Jane Doe. The conflicting edits have been
attached to a conflict message in Cmpy Phonebook. Conflicting edits have
been made to the same item. To resolve this conflict, select the item in the
list below you wish to keep and then choose Keep This Item, or choose
Keep All to preserve all the versions.
If you go into the eventviewer, you sees tons of errors like the ones shown
at the bottom. When it does this store.exe pegs the CPU at the child site to
100%. You also end up with tons of messages in two SMTP queues at the child
site:
1. PreSubmissionQueue (Messages pending submission)
2. WRGLE Routing (Routing Group Connector - Remote delivery)
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Conflicts
Event ID: 3067
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
An item conflict occurred in public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Cmpy Phonebook
.
Message ID: c-2B5D
From: ---
Subject: P H H
Received: 12/22/1999 8:47:34 PM
Database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (DOG).
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Backfill
Event ID: 3073
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
A backfill request (-1 of 69) for public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Parks
Cmpy Phonebook was removed from server
/o=CAT/ou=Food2/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FOOD2SV/cn=Microsoft Public
MDB. CNSET:{0}
CNSET FAI:
21-14B5342,21-14B5344
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links (1 for all the North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, 1 for the Asia Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing How are your AD sites configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing All, We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All other offices range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... and then 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office can send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 connectors. Any thoughts? TIA, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP relay questions
I'm setting up a front end server which will relay email to different systems based on the domain of the recipient, as some don't get spam treatment, and some do. I'm using the instructions in Q293800 to set up the relay. However, one of the domains is a subdomain of the of other. All messages to nbr.org should be sent to server X, while all messages to lists.nbr.org should be sent to server Y. I'm concerned that the Win2k SMTP service will see [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the nbr.org domain, and thus not route the mail correctly. Will the SMTP relay work for this problem? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP relay questions
I believe it will work. It should be easy enough for you to test, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP relay questions I'm setting up a front end server which will relay email to different systems based on the domain of the recipient, as some don't get spam treatment, and some do. I'm using the instructions in Q293800 to set up the relay. However, one of the domains is a subdomain of the of other. All messages to nbr.org should be sent to server X, while all messages to lists.nbr.org should be sent to server Y. I'm concerned that the Win2k SMTP service will see [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the nbr.org domain, and thus not route the mail correctly. Will the SMTP relay work for this problem? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
system manager/recipient policies Mike 850-487-7509 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address Yes -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address 2000 or 5.5? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 2:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
If you have a true cloud and no backup links, then I would think that you'd make one site link for all the sites connected to the cloud. As to Exchange routing group connectors, I would set up standard routing group connectors (not SMTP Connectors) between the sites according to predominant mail flow. There's no reason you couldn't set up a full mesh, either. In fact, I'm not so sure you really need separate routing groups at all given your WAN bandwidth, however, what really matters is available capacity, not raw capacity. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links (1 for all the North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, 1 for the Asia Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing How are your AD sites configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing All, We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All other offices range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... and then 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office can send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 connectors. Any thoughts? TIA, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP relay questions
It is easy enough to test, but I don't like to test on a live network. I could set up a test network, but that seems like a hassle. I might set up Exchange to route that domain as well. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP relay questions I believe it will work. It should be easy enough for you to test, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP relay questions I'm setting up a front end server which will relay email to different systems based on the domain of the recipient, as some don't get spam treatment, and some do. I'm using the instructions in Q293800 to set up the relay. However, one of the domains is a subdomain of the of other. All messages to nbr.org should be sent to server X, while all messages to lists.nbr.org should be sent to server Y. I'm concerned that the Win2k SMTP service will see [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the nbr.org domain, and thus not route the mail correctly. Will the SMTP relay work for this problem? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP relay questions
You should already have a test network. But setting up a relay server is a very low-risk proposition until you actually switch the mail flow through it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP relay questions It is easy enough to test, but I don't like to test on a live network. I could set up a test network, but that seems like a hassle. I might set up Exchange to route that domain as well. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP relay questions I believe it will work. It should be easy enough for you to test, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP relay questions I'm setting up a front end server which will relay email to different systems based on the domain of the recipient, as some don't get spam treatment, and some do. I'm using the instructions in Q293800 to set up the relay. However, one of the domains is a subdomain of the of other. All messages to nbr.org should be sent to server X, while all messages to lists.nbr.org should be sent to server Y. I'm concerned that the Win2k SMTP service will see [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the nbr.org domain, and thus not route the mail correctly. Will the SMTP relay work for this problem? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS
Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange Russell -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS If brute force isn't working for you, chances are, you aren't using enough of it. Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers! John Matteson wrote: There is no problem that cannot be solved by the proper application of sufficient quantities of high explosives. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:49 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Subject: RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS There are seldom good technological solutions to theological problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be with you all. We are a non profit organisation resides in part of Afica. Our organisation's name is Moses's Hand Foundation. We've decided to erased child abuse and some other things which make the youths to be idles. Our recent research made us to realised that many youths in Africa were initiated to be a frauders, they don't have any good intention or any room for the Lord in their hearts. When you asked them, they have some reasons which might be genuine in their own eyes but in God's eyes there are no excuse. This Foundation now decided to stand on it's feet believing that it will get a good support from International countries to say no to Child Abuse and change the mind of youths for Christ. We decided to have a National Seminars for youth and some other programmes that will make these youths to know that if they can study and work and trust God they can do good in the land by not stealing or do frauding all around. Brethen, we need your assistance, either in monetary terms or materials. Your assistance may be some christian books that we can give these people after this program. whatsoever. Let's join hands to say no child abuse in any form, prostitutions and stealing and frauding in any form. Remember that our Moses needed somebody to raise his hand so that victory can be sure. We shall be glad to read from you if you want to assist us financially or materially.you can visit us online at www.hopealive.wsmcafe.com Shalom Best Regards Bro. John Smith _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: CDO and Outlook Security
Not quite the right list... but... Server: exchange 5.5 post sp4 Client: windows 2000 pro/office 2000 Home grown app to mass mail, calls CDO.DLL. Outlook Security Settings Public Folder Form - set up for the user in question - allow/automatically approve *everything*. However - cannot get it to save the settings on the trusted code page (for CDO.DLL). User is getting the do you want to allow the application to send e-mail for every e-mail. Can't get past it. Anyone fixed this before? TIA, Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000
Thanks for the note on this. It made me delve deeper into the Exchange System Manager. You get a message to use the IIS manager for dealing with the OWA pages, but then if you click further down you can actually define the settings in the ESM. Frankly, it's a confusing message that I have a hard time believing doesn't trip up a lot of people... Maybe it's just me. Oh well. Thanks for all the help, it looks like its working now! Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Make sure you make the changes in Exchange System Manager, and not IIS Manager, otherwise they'll be overwritten by a sub-process of the System Attendant called DS2MB. As for the red icons, that's a benign error: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=259373 Neil -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 13 October 2003 15:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Subject: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder security settings we want in place for our users. We've changed them to Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public site. Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes back to the defaults that came with Exchange. Additionally, it seems to lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive), but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds it. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO and Outlook Security
Is this a VBA app? Have you self-signed it so Outlook trusts it? If it's standalone, I can't help. Never done that. Try Slipstick. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: CDO and Outlook Security Not quite the right list... but... Server: exchange 5.5 post sp4 Client: windows 2000 pro/office 2000 Home grown app to mass mail, calls CDO.DLL. Outlook Security Settings Public Folder Form - set up for the user in question - allow/automatically approve *everything*. However - cannot get it to save the settings on the trusted code page (for CDO.DLL). User is getting the do you want to allow the application to send e-mail for every e-mail. Can't get past it. Anyone fixed this before? TIA, Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000
Hehe - found something with Google: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg42612.html Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Thanks for the note on this. It made me delve deeper into the Exchange System Manager. You get a message to use the IIS manager for dealing with the OWA pages, but then if you click further down you can actually define the settings in the ESM. Frankly, it's a confusing message that I have a hard time believing doesn't trip up a lot of people... Maybe it's just me. Oh well. Thanks for all the help, it looks like its working now! Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Make sure you make the changes in Exchange System Manager, and not IIS Manager, otherwise they'll be overwritten by a sub-process of the System Attendant called DS2MB. As for the red icons, that's a benign error: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=259373 Neil -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 13 October 2003 15:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Subject: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder security settings we want in place for our users. We've changed them to Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public site. Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes back to the defaults that came with Exchange. Additionally, it seems to lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive), but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds it. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000
http://www.microsoft.com/korea/business/downloads/asp/ASP_Exchange_2000_ Deployment_Guide.doc Setting security on the front end server 1. Log on to the Exchange back-end server ASP-EXCH-01. 2. Start System Manager: On the Start menu, point to Programs, point to Microsoft Exchange, and then click System Manager. 3. Expand servers ASP-FE-01 expand protocols and expand HTTP 4. right click on Public select Propierties 5. Click on the Access tab 6. Click on Authentication clear Integrated Windows Authentication and anonymous 7. Check that Basic authentication is Enable. In Default domain Enter \ (with out the Quote mark) 8. Click ok and Click OK 9. right click on Exchange select Propierties 10. Click on the Access tab 11. Click on Authentication clear Integrated Windows Authentication and anonymous 12. Check that Basic authentication is Enable. In Default domain Enter \ (with out the Quote mark) 13. Click ok and Click OK 14. Log on to the Exchange front -end server ASP-FE-01. 15. Start command prompt: On the Start menu, click on Run type cmd 16. Type cd c:\inetpub\adminscripts, in the case that your web server is in another path change it for the right one 17. Type cscript.exe adsutil.vbs set w3svc/1/root/defaultlogonDomain \ Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Thanks for the note on this. It made me delve deeper into the Exchange System Manager. You get a message to use the IIS manager for dealing with the OWA pages, but then if you click further down you can actually define the settings in the ESM. Frankly, it's a confusing message that I have a hard time believing doesn't trip up a lot of people... Maybe it's just me. Oh well. Thanks for all the help, it looks like its working now! Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Make sure you make the changes in Exchange System Manager, and not IIS Manager, otherwise they'll be overwritten by a sub-process of the System Attendant called DS2MB. As for the red icons, that's a benign error: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=259373 Neil -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 13 October 2003 15:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Subject: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000 Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder security settings we want in place for our users. We've changed them to Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public site. Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes back to the defaults that came with Exchange. Additionally, it seems to lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive), but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds it. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
Putting all 65 Sites in a single Site Link was my initial plan - but when we had MS in for a sign-off on our AD design they suggested we make 4 Site Links - for replication management and efficiency (as our WAN links are not the most reliable). OK - Thanks. I will definitely give the Routing Group connector a shot. Any gotchas to watch out for when setting up Routing Group connectors? They seem straight forward. So you wouldn't see a problem with each of our 65 offices having 65 connectors - 1 to each and every office? It sure seems like the way to go, especially with or WAN - but wasn't sure how Exchange 2000 would react to having 4000+ connectors in the routing table Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing If you have a true cloud and no backup links, then I would think that you'd make one site link for all the sites connected to the cloud. As to Exchange routing group connectors, I would set up standard routing group connectors (not SMTP Connectors) between the sites according to predominant mail flow. There's no reason you couldn't set up a full mesh, either. In fact, I'm not so sure you really need separate routing groups at all given your WAN bandwidth, however, what really matters is available capacity, not raw capacity. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links (1 for all the North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, 1 for the Asia Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing How are your AD sites configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing All, We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All other offices range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... and then 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office can send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 connectors. Any thoughts? TIA, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ...
I found that the only way I could get this done on our site was to dump a listing of the PFs and the # of items in each one for each server, pull them up side by side in Excel and figure out which server had the more complete copy. Then I removed the replica off the incomplete server, and then rereplicated. Horrendous job with 9000+ PFs, but it worked to get them back in sync. Jane Dumke Messaging Manager University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:(715)346-2463 fax:(715)346-4577 -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ... Hello, E2K (Source Target): SP3+September'03 Rollup, Scanmail 6.1, native OS: w2K, SP3 + all critical fixes , native I'm doing the Ed Crowley Server move. I've got 400 of 1500 Public Folders that haven't replicated completely. It has been over 2 weeks. One thing that seems to force a backfill on a PF is to put a new message/post into the PF. It then seems to figure out it's not up to date and a backfill is kicked off that evening. Most of these PFs do not have an Email address, and are not visible to the Address Book. Any tips on how to send a message to a large number of such folders, or how to force a backfill on them? Notes: -Turning off virus scanning on the Public Folders a week or so ago improved things greatly. -PFs not in sync vary between no messages to just a couple messages off. -No size restrictions on PFs or SMTP. -Active PFs (like this list at 40,000+ messages) sync up just fine. -Source and Target Servers are in the same Server room, plugged into the same Switch. -Hierarchy came across just fine. Just message content has problems. I've done: -ISINTEG and Defrag for Source PF store. -Checked that both Public Folder Stores have proxy addresses set (Q286356) -On the top level folders set propagate settings of Replicas, Replication message priority, and Replication Schedule. Replication Interval is: always run, and Replication message priority is: urgent. With logging turned up I get a lot of these: = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: Replication Errors Event ID: 3093 Date: 9/2/2003 Time: 7:41:51 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Error -2147221233 reading property 0x674b0014 on object type tbtMsgFolder from database First Storage Group\Public Information Store (EXCHANGE). == Thanks, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
Well, I don't necessarily disagree--65 is a lot more than 4. The routing should match your network. If all 65 offices go into the cloud, each could have 64 connectors. But it really only makes sense to have a couple of them to hub offices, especially since the bulk of the mail will end up going to those offices or the Internet anyway. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing Putting all 65 Sites in a single Site Link was my initial plan - but when we had MS in for a sign-off on our AD design they suggested we make 4 Site Links - for replication management and efficiency (as our WAN links are not the most reliable). OK - Thanks. I will definitely give the Routing Group connector a shot. Any gotchas to watch out for when setting up Routing Group connectors? They seem straight forward. So you wouldn't see a problem with each of our 65 offices having 65 connectors - 1 to each and every office? It sure seems like the way to go, especially with or WAN - but wasn't sure how Exchange 2000 would react to having 4000+ connectors in the routing table Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing If you have a true cloud and no backup links, then I would think that you'd make one site link for all the sites connected to the cloud. As to Exchange routing group connectors, I would set up standard routing group connectors (not SMTP Connectors) between the sites according to predominant mail flow. There's no reason you couldn't set up a full mesh, either. In fact, I'm not so sure you really need separate routing groups at all given your WAN bandwidth, however, what really matters is available capacity, not raw capacity. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links (1 for all the North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, 1 for the Asia Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing How are your AD sites configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing All, We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All other offices range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... and then 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office can send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 connectors. Any thoughts? TIA, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
The tech guy that was here installed some kind of help desk application. I don't know
what kind it was?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange
2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
You don't have a product called Outlook Helpdesk from www.kalmstrom.nu set
up in your PF's by chance, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server
Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
Last week, I applied the newest pst SP3 fixes (KB824282 - Exchange
2000Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup) to our Exchange servers (one is in a
child domain). Everything worked fine that day until about midnight when I
started getting tons of e-mails saying something like the following:
Multiple edits have been made to Jane Doe. The conflicting edits have been
attached to a conflict message in Cmpy Phonebook. Conflicting edits have
been made to the same item. To resolve this conflict, select the item in the
list below you wish to keep and then choose Keep This Item, or choose
Keep All to preserve all the versions.
If you go into the eventviewer, you sees tons of errors like the ones shown
at the bottom. When it does this store.exe pegs the CPU at the child site to
100%. You also end up with tons of messages in two SMTP queues at the child
site:
1. PreSubmissionQueue (Messages pending submission)
2. WRGLE Routing (Routing Group Connector - Remote delivery)
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Conflicts
Event ID: 3067
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
An item conflict occurred in public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Cmpy Phonebook
.
Message ID: c-2B5D
From: ---
Subject: P H H
Received: 12/22/1999 8:47:34 PM
Database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (DOG).
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Backfill
Event ID: 3073
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
A backfill request (-1 of 69) for public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Parks
Cmpy Phonebook was removed from server
/o=CAT/ou=Food2/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FOOD2SV/cn=Microsoft Public
MDB. CNSET:{0}
CNSET FAI:
21-14B5342,21-14B5344
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
We have that application installed here on our Ex5.5 system and every once
in a while, we will see those messages pop up. It has something to do with
more than one person opening the PF item, and saving the changes at the same
time.
Since it's just our temporary Help Desk app and since I know what's causing
it, I haven't put any effort in to trying to fix it.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000
Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
The tech guy that was here installed some kind of help desk application. I
don't know what kind it was?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000
Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
You don't have a product called Outlook Helpdesk from www.kalmstrom.nu set
up in your PF's by chance, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server
Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
Last week, I applied the newest pst SP3 fixes (KB824282 - Exchange
2000Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup) to our Exchange servers (one is in a
child domain). Everything worked fine that day until about midnight when I
started getting tons of e-mails saying something like the following:
Multiple edits have been made to Jane Doe. The conflicting edits have been
attached to a conflict message in Cmpy Phonebook. Conflicting edits have
been made to the same item. To resolve this conflict, select the item in the
list below you wish to keep and then choose Keep This Item, or choose
Keep All to preserve all the versions.
If you go into the eventviewer, you sees tons of errors like the ones shown
at the bottom. When it does this store.exe pegs the CPU at the child site to
100%. You also end up with tons of messages in two SMTP queues at the child
site:
1. PreSubmissionQueue (Messages pending submission)
2. WRGLE Routing (Routing Group Connector - Remote delivery)
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Conflicts
Event ID: 3067
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
An item conflict occurred in public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Cmpy Phonebook
.
Message ID: c-2B5D
From: ---
Subject: P H H
Received: 12/22/1999 8:47:34 PM
Database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (DOG).
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Backfill
Event ID: 3073
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
A backfill request (-1 of 69) for public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Parks
Cmpy Phonebook was removed from server
/o=CAT/ou=Food2/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FOOD2SV/cn=Microsoft Public
MDB. CNSET:{0}
CNSET FAI:
21-14B5342,21-14B5344
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ...
Hello, You're catching up on List posts. :-) I ended up dragging a message into every un-synced folder on the Source server. With a list of every bad PF, it was probably only a couple seconds per folder to drag and drop. Backfill then fired off within an hour or so and everything was fine. If we were at 9,000 PFs we might have accidentally suffered and unrecoverable disaster on the PF store. Especially if it was a sunny day outside. :-) Thank you, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dumke, Jane Posted At: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:31 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ... Subject: RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ... I found that the only way I could get this done on our site was to dump a listing of the PFs and the # of items in each one for each server, pull them up side by side in Excel and figure out which server had the more complete copy. Then I removed the replica off the incomplete server, and then rereplicated. Horrendous job with 9000+ PFs, but it worked to get them back in sync. Jane Dumke Messaging Manager University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:(715)346-2463 fax:(715)346-4577 -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ... Hello, E2K (Source Target): SP3+September'03 Rollup, Scanmail 6.1, native OS: w2K, SP3 + all critical fixes , native I'm doing the Ed Crowley Server move. I've got 400 of 1500 Public Folders that haven't replicated completely. It has been over 2 weeks. One thing that seems to force a backfill on a PF is to put a new message/post into the PF. It then seems to figure out it's not up to date and a backfill is kicked off that evening. Most of these PFs do not have an Email address, and are not visible to the Address Book. Any tips on how to send a message to a large number of such folders, or how to force a backfill on them? Notes: -Turning off virus scanning on the Public Folders a week or so ago improved things greatly. -PFs not in sync vary between no messages to just a couple messages off. -No size restrictions on PFs or SMTP. -Active PFs (like this list at 40,000+ messages) sync up just fine. -Source and Target Servers are in the same Server room, plugged into the same Switch. -Hierarchy came across just fine. Just message content has problems. I've done: -ISINTEG and Defrag for Source PF store. -Checked that both Public Folder Stores have proxy addresses set (Q286356) -On the top level folders set propagate settings of Replicas, Replication message priority, and Replication Schedule. Replication Interval is: always run, and Replication message priority is: urgent. With logging turned up I get a lot of these: = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: Replication Errors Event ID: 3093 Date: 9/2/2003 Time: 7:41:51 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Error -2147221233 reading property 0x674b0014 on object type tbtMsgFolder from database First Storage Group\Public Information Store (EXCHANGE). == Thanks, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to change SMTP address for Public Folders
NT 4.0 and exchange 5.5 We are planning to change the SMTP address for our Exchange 5.5 environment to a new address but would like to maintain the existing ones for a while. We could used the Directory Export/Import to accomplish this for mailboxes and DLs but not for Public Folders. Does anyone know of any way to do this? //how _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed
Subject: RE: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 19:00:20 -0400 Start simple: Does this user have local logon rights to the OWA server?=20 No... BUT then I added some clients manually into the local users group...even granted admin. privs just for testing but even that didn't work. Everything was fine before the OWA was placed into a DMZ. Now the server cannot authenticate to the Domain so it cannot find the clients privs.. This server is also acting as a smart host/spam filter scanning both inbound/outbound mail and all of that is working fine. It turns out that most of the company cannot get their mail through OWA any longer. How the heck do I authenticate through the DMZ to the BDC? What now? Shawn _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how does everyone fight this spam?
I am running a trial version of GFI's MailEssencials and MailSecurity on Exchange 5.5. Out of five different Corporate Email security programs I've tested, GFI's products have been the most successful. In addition, there prices are very reasonable. See: http://www.gfi.com/ I also appreciate that GFI gives you a 60 day trial period. I'm not sure why Microsoft has the absolute worst protection (filtering or whatnot) for worms and viruses of all the email server packages available. Isn't that a good example of irony? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
