RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Yes. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Offline Global Address List
Hi, Is there a way to configure Global Address list (Exchange 2000) to be accessed offline? Best Regards, Michel Fayad. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error 12002
Dear List, For the last few days I am receiving an error every minute, source: MsExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Description: Error 800cce05-8000 occured while processing message from XYZ. I have search this error on MS Web sites but was unable to find any clue, can someone help me in this regards. regards, irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error 12002
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=12002source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: 01 December 2003 12:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error 12002 Dear List, For the last few days I am receiving an error every minute, source: MsExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Description: Error 800cce05-8000 occured while processing message from XYZ. I have search this error on MS Web sites but was unable to find any clue, can someone help me in this regards. regards, irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Offline Global Address List
Yes use Outlook in offline mode. Then download Address book for use when offline. From: Michel Fayad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Offline Global Address List Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:09:58 +0200 Hi, Is there a way to configure Global Address list (Exchange 2000) to be accessed offline? Best Regards, Michel Fayad. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment equipment, video game reviews, and more here. http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Living dangerously, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
2653.23 SP4. Sorry, I pulled the Help..About on a client Administrator machine. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Living dangerously, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
In the past, when confronted with this issue, I've done a full Directory Export (inc hidden mailboxes) and then done a search of the resulting CSV file to find which account has the SMTP address assigned. There is probably a slicker way of finding which account has the SMTP address, but the way above worked ok. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Apply SP4 to your client. As for your orphan, do a directory export (all objects - including the secondary proxy addresses) to find it. If you arent sure how to export the secondary proxy addresses, do a search in Technet on how to do that. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 2653.23 SP4. Sorry, I pulled the Help..About on a client Administrator machine. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Living dangerously, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange standard and exchange enterprise? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Require all users to use POP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
No there are a few more differences.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange standard and exchange enterprise? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Require all users to use POP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
Enterprise comes with the X.400 connector has standard. At least that is the way it was for 5.5 From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:09:30 -0600 Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange standard and exchange enterprise? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Require all users to use POP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Groove on the latest from the hot new rock groups! Get downloads, videos, and more here. http://special.msn.com/entertainment/wiredformusic.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
5.5 Enterprise also includes additional connectors. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange standard and exchange enterprise? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Require all users to use POP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
And that whole front end back in thing, multi store thing.. Something like that.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. 5.5 Enterprise also includes additional connectors. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange standard and exchange enterprise? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Require all users to use POP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
The address is attached to a public folder. The public folder reports The object in the information store could not be found ID no. c1040af2. I think this means that I'm going to have to recreate the public folders by copying all the mail and Calendar items out to a PST file and then delete the PUB.Edb (and assoc.) files. Does this sound the correct way to go about it, or does anybody know an easier way? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Apply SP4 to your client. As for your orphan, do a directory export (all objects - including the secondary proxy addresses) to find it. If you arent sure how to export the secondary proxy addresses, do a search in Technet on how to do that. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 2653.23 SP4. Sorry, I pulled the Help..About on a client Administrator machine. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Living dangerously, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
Hi there There are some drawbacks to clusters: 1) They are more difficult to administer 2) Memory fragmentation 3) Extra steps when setting up a front end/ back end configuration 4) Cannot support SRS 5) MS now only recommends Active/ Passive (Some PSS techs have gone as far as saying Active/ Active is no longer supported) 6) The dreaded -1018 error - no protection there 7) There are times when a rollover fails - then it rolls back to the original node. That does take as long as a regular reboot The positive side to clustering: 1) Rolling the server is quicker than rebooting a server 2) It looks good on your resume Believe me, I have a cluster. For the money we spent on it, we could have gotten a regular server that would rock. I also have a standard server with Exchange 2K - and so far, the thing has been rock solid. I can show you What's up logs for the past six months showing 99.98% uptime. Best wishes Russell PS - Friends don't let friends cluster exchange -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments OK, I know the majority of this list is against clustering Exchange. But does anyone have some sound reasoning behind this argument that could be used to convince someone at the executive level? I don't think many executives are too compassionate for the it's harder to administer argument. And I need more ammo than just saying that clusters won't protect you from database corruption anyway. Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
Your welcome. Waiting on it myself. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
I put 691 on my Exchange server on Sat. So far so good, but I haven't seen any of these new virus's yet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Your welcome. Waiting on it myself. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Strange Delivery Method
So what don't you understand? The To: address was spoofed and you were added to the Bcc: section, so your address won't show up in the headers. If you take a look at the NDRs in your Admin mailbox, you will see an NDR for the address indicated below. It's spam, pure and simple...delete it or block it or both. -Original Message- From: NPARRAY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Delivery Method Hello All, I received a mail item in my inbox this morning where the recipient is set to another user. This is an account that had been deleted about two years ago from the system. Since then the system had crashed and had to be restored. The mail itself is spam but my major concern about this one is the receipt of mail destined for another account. I've looked at the mail header and the recipient is indeed indicating another recipient. I've included the header below. Anoyone has any explanation for what happened here and does this indicate some weakness in my setup that I should be concerned about? TIA Navin Received: from lns-p19-8-82-65-145-246.adsl.proxad.net ([82.65.145.246]) by exchange.plipdeco.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id W4TT8ZAN; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:45:28 -0400 Received: from [2.220.72.61] by lns-p19-8-82-65-145-246.adsl.proxad.net id 5287070-99656; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:34:33 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Earnest Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Earnest Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Next day shipping on your medication!beograd Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:34:33 GMT X-Mailer: merle savage taxidermy2561 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_5CF0E2.73ED1A__ X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --_5CF0E2.73ED1A__ Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --_5CF0E2.73ED1A__-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
I have in fact I had to tell trend about it... My first cutting edge I got hammered last week monday been cleaning since WORM_AGOBOT.A3 it's a bite... there was no def on it from anyone and I have yet to figure how it got inlikely a rogue laptop plugged in.. it's bite's Im crabby bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I put 691 on my Exchange server on Sat. So far so good, but I haven't seen any of these new virus's yet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Your welcome. Waiting on it myself. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe:
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Maybe it is an orphaned public folder? Can you find any public folder with that name and try to home it (make a replica of it on this server)? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server The address is attached to a public folder. The public folder reports The object in the information store could not be found ID no. c1040af2. I think this means that I'm going to have to recreate the public folders by copying all the mail and Calendar items out to a PST file and then delete the PUB.Edb (and assoc.) files. Does this sound the correct way to go about it, or does anybody know an easier way? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Apply SP4 to your client. As for your orphan, do a directory export (all objects - including the secondary proxy addresses) to find it. If you arent sure how to export the secondary proxy addresses, do a search in Technet on how to do that. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 2653.23 SP4. Sorry, I pulled the Help..About on a client Administrator machine. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Living dangerously, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr
Is there a way to run Outlook 97 on a Windows 2000 box in an NT4 domain without giving the user Power user or Administrator privileges? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr
Why, oh why would you run Outlook 97? Outlook 98 was a free upgrade for anyone running Outlook 97 Outlook 98 should run just fine with User privileges. Joe Pochedley Weiler's Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr Is there a way to run Outlook 97 on a Windows 2000 box in an NT4 domain without giving the user Power user or Administrator privileges? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr
Can outside applications run Outlook 98? -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr Why, oh why would you run Outlook 97? Outlook 98 was a free upgrade for anyone running Outlook 97 Outlook 98 should run just fine with User privileges. Joe Pochedley Weiler's Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr Is there a way to run Outlook 97 on a Windows 2000 box in an NT4 domain without giving the user Power user or Administrator privileges? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=eng lish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr
This sounds like a setup issue. I generally add the User to Administrators group during setup and testing. To make sure everything is set properly in the user's registry. Then change the user to the group you want and re-check. You may need to adjust permissions some, depending on which group you put them in. Regards, P1 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr Is there a way to run Outlook 97 on a Windows 2000 box in an NT4 domain without giving the user Power user or Administrator privileges? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr
I have done that and it doesn't work. I found a reg hack for it so I guess I can try that. -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr This sounds like a setup issue. I generally add the User to Administrators group during setup and testing. To make sure everything is set properly in the user's registry. Then change the user to the group you want and re-check. You may need to adjust permissions some, depending on which group you put them in. Regards, P1 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr Is there a way to run Outlook 97 on a Windows 2000 box in an NT4 domain without giving the user Power user or Administrator privileges? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=? =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=eng lish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EX55] Mailbox Move
Does the Mailbox Move function of Exchange 5.5 perserve single instance storage? K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EX55] Mailbox Move
Yes. -Original Message- From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EX55] Mailbox Move Does the Mailbox Move function of Exchange 5.5 perserve single instance storage? K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook users
Hello. Is it possible to send an appointment to an Outlook user in an external Exchange organization? If I send a meeting request to an external Exchange organization, how does the recipient respond? Will they have the option to accept/tentative/deny? Will the appointment act differently then when sending an appointment within your own exchange organization? I have a user who recieved an appointment from an Outlook user from an external Exchange organization. She accepted the meeting request and it was scheduled on her calendar. I didn't think this was possilbe without proper permissions or trusts between Exchange organizations in separate Forests??? Thanks for any help or clarification. Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED])j%\or+)zr^uZX:.m[hy\z[,)rZZvh+-i2G(
RE: Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook users
http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/40021/40021.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook users
Hello.
Is it possible to send an appointment to an Outlook user in an external
Exchange organization? If I send a meeting request to an external Exchange
organization, how does the recipient respond? Will they have the option to
accept/tentative/deny? Will the appointment act differently then when
sending an appointment within your own exchange organization?
I have a user who recieved an appointment from an Outlook user from an
external Exchange organization. She accepted the meeting request and it was
scheduled on her calendar. I didn't think this was possilbe without proper
permissions or trusts between Exchange organizations in separate
Forests???
Thanks for any help or clarification.
Samantha
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S ^jZ 2G(L\xfyb))
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr
Switch to the Exchange 5.0 client on OS/2 Warp. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 97 W/O Admin or Pwr Usr Is there a way to run Outlook 97 on a Windows 2000 box in an NT4 domain without giving the user Power user or Administrator privileges? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
2 only applies to active-active clusters. 6 is not a drawback to clusters, just not a reason for them. But your other points are well taken. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments Hi there There are some drawbacks to clusters: 1) They are more difficult to administer 2) Memory fragmentation 3) Extra steps when setting up a front end/ back end configuration 4) Cannot support SRS 5) MS now only recommends Active/ Passive (Some PSS techs have gone as far as saying Active/ Active is no longer supported) 6) The dreaded -1018 error - no protection there 7) There are times when a rollover fails - then it rolls back to the original node. That does take as long as a regular reboot The positive side to clustering: 1) Rolling the server is quicker than rebooting a server 2) It looks good on your resume Believe me, I have a cluster. For the money we spent on it, we could have gotten a regular server that would rock. I also have a standard server with Exchange 2K - and so far, the thing has been rock solid. I can show you What's up logs for the past six months showing 99.98% uptime. Best wishes Russell PS - Friends don't let friends cluster exchange -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments OK, I know the majority of this list is against clustering Exchange. But does anyone have some sound reasoning behind this argument that could be used to convince someone at the executive level? I don't think many executives are too compassionate for the it's harder to administer argument. And I need more ammo than just saying that clusters won't protect you from database corruption anyway. Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error 12002
Thanks Buddy. -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error 12002 http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=12002source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: 01 December 2003 12:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error 12002 Dear List, For the last few days I am receiving an error every minute, source: MsExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Description: Error 800cce05-8000 occured while processing message from XYZ. I have search this error on MS Web sites but was unable to find any clue, can someone help me in this regards. regards, irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
