RE: redirect restore - can't see public folders
Assuming the public folder store you restored has the data in it (check under public folder resources), you probably just need to go to the properties of the public folder store, instances tab, and add everything from the left pane to the right pane. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: redirect restore - can't see public folders I am trying to recover some public folder data. I used Backup Exec 8.6 and redirected a restore of the public and private databases to another server (same site and org - different server). I can now access individual mailboxes but when I try to access the public folder info I get the error below. Can anyone assist me with info on why this might be happening. Unable to display the folder. The contents of this public folder are currently unavailable. Either the Microsoft Exchange Server computer servicing this public folder is down or the public folder has not been replicated to this site. I am running Exchange 5.5. Thanks in advance. Louanne This mail was processed by Mail essentials for Exchange/SMTP, the email security management gateway. Mail essentials adds content checking, email encryption, anti spam, anti virus, attachment compression, personalised auto responders, archiving and more to your Microsoft Exchange Server or SMTP mail server. For more information visit http://www.mailessentials.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Actually, it's not recommended to backup any \exchsrvr folder while any Exchange services are running. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Correct, I should have elaborated. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange what? You mean without an Exchange Aware backup, right? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Our defense is in the preservation of the spirit which prizes liberty as a heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere. Destroy this spirit and you have planted the seeds of despotism around your own doors. --Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Seigler Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Actually, it's not recommended to backup any \exchsrvr folder while any Exchange services are running. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Certainly everyone is entitled to their viewpoint. I was simply stating the fact that from my experience, I prefer Move Server over ExMerge, then I listed a few reasons, one of them being that Move Server is fully supported, while ExMerge is not. To some customers, that reason alone is enough to use the tool that I prefer them using. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Next thing you will be telling me its under warranty product Most people on this list have been around exmerge and its various revisons and even the pst exporters pre exmerge!. As you know it was a BORK product and now has been placed on a mainstream product and in this case I think this has been a techie request and not a marketing ploy. Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint so I leave it at that. smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Ok, let me ellaborate on this a little bit. I work in PSS, in a group close to the group that the individual who originially wrote ExMerge worked in. That individual maintained the ExMerge code for several years. That individual has now moved to MCS, and is no longer maintaining that code. I'm not saying that it's buggy. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with it. I'm not saying that you shouldn't use it. What I'm saying is that a lot of time and effort was used to delevop and test the Move Server Wizard. It is fully supported, and there are code maintainers for it. For moving servers between sites or orgs, in my opinion, Move Server is the best, hands down. I will recommend it each and every time the question is asked. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Strange, I've never seen Exmerge crash my server, but I suppose there is a possibility. Then again, wouldn't ISScan have the same potential impact? We (the general we) run these utilities occasionally for virus outbreaks, etc... These are the supported methods to ripping stuff out of the IS during these types of outbreaks. So how may I ask do you propose admins take care of their server then? Most of us know that there are different versions of Exmerge for the different levels of Exchange, now if this utility is buggy as you say, why do we Exchange professionals out in the real world use it? Why has it been suggested we use it? Or are you quoting how MS wants it done? For those of us in the real world, there is the MS way and there is the real way. Are you telling me I've been doing it wrong for the last 6 years? At any rate, there is a risk involved any time you do anything to the exchange server databases. That's like saying that eseutil is NOT supported because it can crash the server. I'm just curious to your position on all of this. Being a part of MS, I know you can't divulge your honest opinion, but throw me a bone. I've been working with Exchange since it was born, so... I'm a bit curious. I'm certainly not saying you're wrong, but you have my attention for the minute. D It's not your blue blood, your pedigree or your college degree. It's what you do with your life that counts. -Millard Fuller -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially
RE: Encrypted Emails - XP?
The error message indicates that we are failing to read userCertificate and/or userSMIMECertificate from all the of the recipients. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encrypted Emails - XP? Signing and encryption certificates issued by the exchange server for internal use only. No real world authority. Cast64 for encrypting, not sure what its using for signatures. e- -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Encrypted Emails - XP? What are the sttings on KMS ( Certificate type, algorythme, external certificat authority) Are the WinXP machine set to use 128 bit encryption? /Peter - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Encrypted Emails - XP? Error reads before sending Microsoft Outlook had problems encrypting this message because the following recipients had missing or invalid certificates, or conflicting or unsupported encryption capabilities. Then it gives me the option to send unencrypted or cancel, and it logs the event id 2.(see below) e- -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Encrypted Emails - XP? Eric, I'm using the WinXPpro and Office XP with encryption w/o any problems. Can they read encrypted messagess? What error message they get when trying to send? /Peter - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:50 PM Subject: RE: Encrypted Emails - XP? No, I reinstalled KMS, deleted the old KMS database per the installer, and reenrolled the clients. Ive done this before with exchange clients and outlook clients and have never had any problems, I blame XP. -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encrypted Emails - XP? Were they already enrolled in KMS, and they got new computers? If so, you'll need to run each of them through the advanced security recovery process. It's very simple, look in the KMS docs for intstructions. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encrypted Emails - XP? Hi I had a Dev group get XP OS and Outlook XP on their systems and they seem to have lost the ability to send encrypted emails through the KMserver on our exchange site(not sending external). Anyone running XP? Any ideas? I'm not entirely convinced that it's a Outlook problem, I had to disable a setting in the local security policy just to get the XP machines on the nt4 domain. The only associated event is Event ID 2 :crypt Successful auto update retrieval of third-party root list cab from: http://www.download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/update/v3/static/t rust edr/ en/authrootstl.cab For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.; When I click on the link it sends something to MS (oh joy) and comes back with a cab file that has a authroot.stl in it. I haven't the slightest clue what to do with this file. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Encrypted Emails - XP?
Were they already enrolled in KMS, and they got new computers? If so, you'll need to run each of them through the advanced security recovery process. It's very simple, look in the KMS docs for intstructions. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encrypted Emails - XP? Hi I had a Dev group get XP OS and Outlook XP on their systems and they seem to have lost the ability to send encrypted emails through the KMserver on our exchange site(not sending external). Anyone running XP? Any ideas? I'm not entirely convinced that it's a Outlook problem, I had to disable a setting in the local security policy just to get the XP machines on the nt4 domain. The only associated event is Event ID 2 :crypt Successful auto update retrieval of third-party root list cab from: http://www.download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/update/v3/static/trust edr/ en/authrootstl.cab For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.; When I click on the link it sends something to MS (oh joy) and comes back with a cab file that has a authroot.stl in it. I haven't the slightest clue what to do with this file. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 Platfo rm.
1. Yes. ADC and forestprep/domainprep are only for e2k. 2. That won't work. 5.5 on a GC cannot upgrade to e2k. See Q275127 for information. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 Platfo rm. I have one question about upgrading Exchange 5.5 (SP 4) on a Windows NT 4.0 (SP 6a) platform to Windows 2000. Is it possible to run Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 without preparing the Forest and the Domain and without applying the ADC? Will Exchange 5.5 run normal as if it was running on the NT 4.0 platform if you only upgrade to Windows 2000? My second questions is about Domain Mode when upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I am planning to upgrade a Windows NT PDC Running Exchange 5.5 to Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000. The setup will be only one Domain with one DC functioning as the only Exchange 2000 Server. Can this be done without any problem if the Domain is in mixed mode? Any advice how this can be done? Thanks allot! Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
And backup alone Is not good enough either. You must restore too. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Installing Arcserve Is not enough punishment You must make it work. -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I screwed up haiku So must now punish myself Installing arcserv Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's Five-Seven-Five Your first line was only four Go Punish yourself -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install Exch 2000 issue
Try Q297921. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Conley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install Exch 2000 issue When I attempt to install Exchange 2000 - I am presented with a screen asking me for the service account. The user name and domain are grayed out, but the password box is available. I cannot find any information from support.microsoft.com or microsoft.com/exchange. I can type a password, but then I am presented with a pop up box telling me to use a valid account, which i cannot do because the box is grayed out. All help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install Exch 2000 issue
Could also be Q298416. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:00 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Install Exch 2000 issue Try Q297921. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Conley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install Exch 2000 issue When I attempt to install Exchange 2000 - I am presented with a screen asking me for the service account. The user name and domain are grayed out, but the password box is available. I cannot find any information from support.microsoft.com or microsoft.com/exchange. I can type a password, but then I am presented with a pop up box telling me to use a valid account, which i cannot do because the box is grayed out. All help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replication problem
You need to acquire a copy of chkds.exe, and run: chkds -fixOrphaned -aseigler -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem ww Error -1601 (JET_errRecordNotFound) in the 1171 Error 22 (JET_errRecordTooBig) in the 1059 which is probably a packed page. either way, it looks like it is heading towards a CHKDSRO to verify the problem when do you have downtime scheduled for this box? Stephen -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/3/01 12:46 PM Subject: RE: Replication problem Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 1171 Date: 10/3/2001 Time: 11:12:04 AM User: INFOSYS\ExchAdmin Computer: EXCH-SRV4 Description: Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 1651 (internal ID 208017d). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. --and-- Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Replication Event ID: 1059 Date: 10/3/2001 Time: 11:12:04 AM User: INFOSYS\ExchAdmin Computer: EXCH-SRV4 Description: Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error 22. --and-- Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Replication Event ID: 1070 Date: 10/3/2001 Time: 11:11:33 AM User: INFOSYS\ExchAdmin Computer: EXCH-SRV4 Description: Internal event: Directory f68ebf464c66d4118f5200b0d0205037 EXCH-SRV3 asked the directory replication agent (DRA) to get changes from naming context /o=WHF/ou=Hospital starting at update sequence number (USN) 56504 with flags 71 and sensitivity 100. Even with errors, Microsoft's KB isn't helping much. I get results when I query for the Event ID, but what I get tends to be for Exchange 5.0. Thanks Don. Jessica _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: _Changing Exchange Passwords
Since you say usermgr, I assume you're talking about 5.5 on NT4. You need to go into the admin program, on the properties of the configuration container, service account password tab, and change the password there for one server in your site, then restart the services on all servers after changing the password in usermgr. Also, look for antivirus software that starts using the same account. You may have to change the password for that too. -aseigler -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: _Changing Exchange Passwords A member if my IS team has left our company and for security purposes we will change our administrative passwords, which includes accounts used for log on locally services. Are there any gotchas that I should look out for when changing my exchange administrator account password? My plan is to simply log out of any machines that my have the exchange administrator account logged in, change the password in Usermgr, then restart services and/or reboot servers as necessary and watch to make sure that the services start properly. Am I missing anything? Thanks, William L. Smith, MCP Systems Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster
1. Move all the VS's to one node (Node 0). 2. Run update on the inactive node (Node 1), reboot when done. 3. Move all the VS's again (to Node 1). 4. Run update on the inactive node (Node 0), reboot when done. 5. Move all VS's to where you want them. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster Any thoughts/problems/suggestions associated with installing SP2 onto a 2 node exchange 2000 cluster? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
