EX55: Blocking OUTBOUND email by domain??
I need to block inbound and outbound email to a particular domain on exchange 5.5. I searched the net and only found an Exchange 2000 way to do this. For inbound I simply added that domain to the TURF settings and that works fine. For outbound the only kludge I could come up with is to set up a CONNECTION/Specify by email domain and set that domain to route through 0.0.0.0. This host is unreachable which means that the messages sit in the outbound queue and retry until they expire (as well as generating a bunch of alerts to the sender). Is there a better way to do this? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange Users receiving messages not addressed to them
The messages could be sent TO: the bogus alias and have a BCC: (blind carbon copy) to his valid address. -Original Message- From: Justin Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Users receiving messages not addressed to them Has anybody had any problems with any of their users receiving email a bogus alias? One of my Exchange users has recently been receiving emails addressed to an alias that does not exist anywhere on our domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command line directory export of GAL container
Google search using: command line exchange 5.5 gal export Yields a lot of stuff including: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Command line directory export of GAL container How does one export the contents of the Global Address List container from the command line (Exchange 5.5)? I can select the Global Address List container from within Admin as the source to export to a csv file, but I want to script the process. Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IFS
If you would like to disable the messenger service (for all computers) in a login script, just use this in a reg file: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Messenger] Start=dword:0004 Save that as something.reg and add this command to your login script: start /wait regedit /s \\pdc1\netlogon\something.reg (change pdc1 to the name of your login server and put the REG file in the netlogon directory) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Thanks everyone. This was a great string. Very useful. I will be disabling the messenger service on all server too. Thanks again. Samantha -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS What do you mean? Do you send popup messages as alerts? Even the Monitoring notifications from Exchange send out e-mail alerts (though one could argue the usefulness of that feature) or scripts (which require an executable to be specified). Neither one uses the Messenger service, though I suppose you could configure your script to use that. I would say that it is best to not have your Exchange server monitoring itself. Put a monitoring package on a server with the SMTP service installed and use that to send out your alerts. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS If you disable the messenger service, won't that hinder sending Alerts if you use them? Samantha -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Yes, only teasing... Sort of Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Don't pay any attention to him. He's kidding. Eric? You're kidding, right??? Eric??? Seriously though, I'd disable that service. It's part of my standard build procedures for all servers (there is no reason that you need to send popup messages to/from servers) and it does not affect anything else. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:55 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS How? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Because you have been own3d by 31137 hax0rs. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Why is your messenger service running? You can safely disable it. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS Thanks, I was worried, because I received a number of messenger pop-ups on that server, and it is behind a firewall and no-one should be able to do that, then I bumped on to that file... Kim -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point during normal processing. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IFS Help, Under the folder mdbdata there is suddenly a .IFS file, can anyone tell me what it is/does, and how it got there? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IFS
Group Policy?? That would required changing to Active Directory This is for us old fashioned NT4 domain people. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Well, shoot. You can disable the Messenger service via Group Policy as well. Then, you don't have to worry about missing a server. GPO's are nifty that way :-) Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 1:46 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS If you would like to disable the messenger service (for all computers) in a login script, just use this in a reg file: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Messenger] Start=dword:0004 Save that as something.reg and add this command to your login script: start /wait regedit /s \\pdc1\netlogon\something.reg (change pdc1 to the name of your login server and put the REG file in the netlogon directory) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Thanks everyone. This was a great string. Very useful. I will be disabling the messenger service on all server too. Thanks again. Samantha -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS What do you mean? Do you send popup messages as alerts? Even the Monitoring notifications from Exchange send out e-mail alerts (though one could argue the usefulness of that feature) or scripts (which require an executable to be specified). Neither one uses the Messenger service, though I suppose you could configure your script to use that. I would say that it is best to not have your Exchange server monitoring itself. Put a monitoring package on a server with the SMTP service installed and use that to send out your alerts. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS If you disable the messenger service, won't that hinder sending Alerts if you use them? Samantha -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Yes, only teasing... Sort of Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Don't pay any attention to him. He's kidding. Eric? You're kidding, right??? Eric??? Seriously though, I'd disable that service. It's part of my standard build procedures for all servers (there is no reason that you need to send popup messages to/from servers) and it does not affect anything else. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:55 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS How? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Because you have been own3d by 31137 hax0rs. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Why is your messenger service running? You can safely disable it. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS Thanks, I was worried, because I received a number of messenger pop-ups on that server, and it is behind a firewall and no-one should be able to do that, then I bumped on to that file... Kim -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point during normal processing. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IFS Help, Under the folder mdbdata
RE: What is SPAM - Please comment
Any email with MVP in the signature is spam. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is SPAM - Please comment More ethical discussions? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is SPAM - Please comment Dear All I would be interested in any comments about the following ethical problem. Recently I was contacted by an acquaintance who sent me the following email. Hi I would be grateful if you could forward an email to your colleague's users about a number of telephony and Internet access packages I am involved in offering to BT users. The Broadband Offerings start at £15.99, which I believe is amongst the cheapest around. Tiscali that I know you have good experiences of supplies the packages. They would all save your users money and some of them are free. If you want to you could join up as an associate and make money as well. The users can find out more info by visiting www.telco-store.com Thanks for your assistance. . My question to you is whether if I were to send out a mail to my colleagues would you consider this Spam. I do believe that this is a good offering from a reputable company which would save my users money but it could fall under the category of unsolicited email. However so is a global email to my users warning them of Spam from Nigeria for example or warning them that somebody has left their car headlights on in the works carpark !! Do you consider this different to producing a paper notice about this offering and sticking it on the works notice board. I welcome your comments -- http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sources of outages
There is no secret cabal!!! -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret agendas ? -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Apathy - 75% -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Poor Admin Practices : 90% -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sources of outages Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate. Agree? Communication lines and services 80 percent Servers 14 percent Routers and switches 1 percent Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sources of outages
I'll tell you what! That has to be Dale, the exterminator from King of the Hill. Keep your $ -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages No, but it might be a government conspiracy. That's what my friend Rusty Shackleford thinks, anyways. (Note: $5 USD to the person that can name the TV show and character that said that line) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages There is no secret cabal!!! -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret agendas ? -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Apathy - 75% -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Poor Admin Practices : 90% -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sources of outages Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate. Agree? Communication lines and services 80 percent Servers 14 percent Routers and switches 1 percent Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
That is exactly what I was looking for. We are running BES 2.1 now but I am ready to switch over to 3.x very soon. I have already switched all my rules back to the server because I was being flooded with Blackberry messaages where it saw them before the rule kicked in. Does anyone have any experience in how many seconds delay is enough? Tom -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server However, if you absolutely must persist with this bloody stupid way of doing things, here's a reghack for the server that'll do what you need it to do. It was originally pointed to me by the below Mr. Webb's lovely wife... :) Oh, the text below says HKLM. Put it in HKCU as well, same tree path. QUOTE: Just a tip I learned that I thought I would pass along to the rest of you on how to make the Blackberry work better if you use a spam filter or Outlook rules. I get about 200-250 spam emails per day so I use a spam filter (I Hate Spam, which does work well and I have no association with that company) and also use Outlook rules to move certain emails to various folders so, while my Outlook Inbox was relatively clean, my Blackberry was getting very hard to use due to the shear number of messages on it. I personally found the filters in the Desktop Manager were useless for me but the following registry hack allows both my spam filter and Outlook rules to do their job before the Blackberry server ever process anything, thereby resulting in a very manageable handheld. I am using the Exchange Enterprise v2.1 server but I was told this reg hack should work for all versions. I'm not sure how you'd do it on a desktop redirector but there's probably a way. Go to regedit and go to: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Research in Motion\BlackBerry\Server add a DWORD value called ProcessMailDelay (without the quotes) The decimal value you set here will be the delay, in seconds, that the server waits before looking at a user's Inbox to begin routing to the handheld Stop/Restart the Blackberry Server service Hope this helps someone out there. :ENDQUOTE Gary -- Gary K. Slinger CP Ships - Global Manager, Windows Systems Tampa, Florida Office: +1-813-209-2320 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server 1. making the evidence 10 times more expensive for someone to discover /kidding These things always seem to come from legal. But what's worse? Having one set of Exchange backup tapes subpoenaed or 5000 PC hard drives? It's interesting to see how the timeframe has changed over the years. It seems like in the past everyone was trying to delete everything after 30 days, and now it's 60 days. This is an example of people not understanding what an information economy is. A very sad example I suppose. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server Give me one business (I was going to say good, but that's not possible) reason for this, and I'll give you ten times that many technical reason why the PST solution is a bad one. I hope you went down kicking and screaming on this one. I for one would also be polishing up my resume and kicking down some doors as well. This is only going to get ugly for you from this point out. Good Luck.. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server They are still good for the calendar and contacts, which are exempt from the 60 day limit. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server You might as well retire all your Exchange servers and replace them with something cheaper. Woohoo! Save some money, maybe they will give it back to you as a bonus! Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
PST = my only choice -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server PST = bad. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
They are still good for the calendar and contacts, which are exempt from the 60 day limit. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server You might as well retire all your Exchange servers and replace them with something cheaper. Woohoo! Save some money, maybe they will give it back to you as a bonus! Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
IMAP is fine if you don't care about contacts, calendar or tasks. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Race between client rules and BES server
Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Last I checked the Ximian connector did not work on Exchange 5.5 (it requires exchange 2000 or newer). -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to view/edit the calendar, tasks, etc... it's very similar in appearance to outlook. Quite a few of our Linux people use it. (it's really going through OWA to get to the additional folders (calendar, tasks)). Seems to work quit well here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5
If you use caching mode with outlook 2003 and exchange 5.5, then your cache is limited to 2gig (it cannot use the new enhanced unicode PST format. This means that if you have anywhere close to 2gig in your server mailbox it will not work (it will fill up the 2gig of an old style PST then give you an error). The only workaround is to stop using cache mode or trim your server storage to much less than 2g (like 1.5gig or less as the PST format is much less efficient than PSTs) Tom -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 No. You can use cache mode with any flavor of Exchange. I believe E2K3 is optimized for it, but it works with any flavor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 So what is the correct answer? To use caching mode do you have to be using both Outlook 2003 AND Exchange 2003?? -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Right. All mcary was saying is that he thought you HAD to be using Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2003 in order to use cached mode. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Camara, David Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I think what he meant was that he likes the caching mode. Not necessarily using outlook 2003 with exchange 2003. Jose David P. Camara II IT-NT Administration Credit Lyonnais (212)2613868 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Are you using Cached mode with Exchange 5.5? I was under the impression that you had to running both Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2003 for Cached mode to work. -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 This is being sent from Outlook 2003 through a 5.5 server also. It works fine. Cached mode is cool too. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I am using 2003 on XP to 5.5 right now and it works fine. -Original Message- From: Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Outlook 2003 on Windows 2000 works fine on Exchange v5.5 (I'm using it right now!). Yes, same here. Also, Outlook 2002 on Windows XP works great for me. It's just the combination of XP and Outlook 2003 that is causing me troubles. The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Credit Lyonnais This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion. Credit Lyonnais in the Americas: Credit Lyonnais Bank New York Branch, Credit Lyonnais Americas Services Inc., Credit Lyonnais Rouse (USA)
RE: exmerge? 5.5
Or export them to a pst? (Being careful to not get anywhere near the 2g pst limit). -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge? 5.5 Not to my knowledge. You have to manually copy the PF's to a PST from within Outlook. That is always how we have done it during our migrations. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 7:51 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: exmerge? 5.5 Subject: exmerge? 5.5 Is there a utility like exmerge that can export out the public folders. They have a ton of email with attachments and I would love to able to export out intact just in case. _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
I am running Mailbox Manager right now in audit mode and I am seeing this problem intermittantly. If you turn on attach detailed log file and look at the CSV file, I see that it is skipping all mailboxes when this happens. Not sure what the problem is. I stopped and restarted the mailbox manager service and I think that gets it to work again at least once. I am running exchange 5.5sp4 on win2k sp4 here. Tom -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Manager Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
I have been searching Google for a solution and so far have found many people with this problem, but no solutions. One person said that restarting the mailbox manager service fixes it temporarily. I thought this too as this got it to work once for me, but I just tried it again (restarting the service) and still it will not process any mailboxes (although it has several times). I am running exchange 5.5sp4 on win2k sp4 and have the mailbox manager from the sp4 download. I see in the knowledge base that there is a newer mailbox manager (post-sp4) but they do not mention this problem and it is not available for download (you must call PSS and beg for it). Tom -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Manager Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus with XP
One of those hosts file viruses relocates the hosts file to c:\windows\help (or c:\winnt\help). It does not overwrite your existing hosts file, but puts a bogus one in the help directory and modifies the registry so windows looks there instead. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP What is the name of this file and where is it location? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP Check to see if your local hosts file has a bunch of bogus entries. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus with XP My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean it. Now when I open my browser and go to www.google.com it take me to another website www.cpanel.net. Has anyone seen this before and I do I fix this? Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Destroy all backups after 60 days (or whatever they want the VM retention to be). -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Don't back anything up. :) -Original Message- From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Ed, I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion. A colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today. My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more and more of an audit train. Senior managers throughout the industry are over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road. Kelly -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Quit doing brick level backup! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to present options. Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know of a package with thie capability? Thanks in advance, Kelly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? - RESOLVED
I got a chance to stop and start the IS (and the IMC too for good measure) and the turftable changes finally took effect. Apparently most of the time restarting the IMC is all you need but sometimes the IS must be restarted too (this is exchange 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp3). Tom -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I tried your reg file and that didn't help either. I found (with google's help) a user on a forum somewhere that ran into the same problem. He had to restart the IS for the turftable changes to take. I can't restart the IS right now but will try that later. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Clean out the registry storage of TurfTable. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs]TurfTable An empty table is two zero byte values in a row. QuickFix: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs] TurfTable=hex(7):00,00 EndQuickFix: Put the above 4 lines into TurfTable.reg file. Stop the IMC. Import it into the registry. Start the IMC. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and it still rejects this message. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Check for @aa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message. You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out for other details. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and it still rejects this message. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Check for @aa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message. You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out for other details. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
I tried your reg file and that didn't help either. I found (with google's help) a user on a forum somewhere that ran into the same problem. He had to restart the IS for the turftable changes to take. I can't restart the IS right now but will try that later. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Clean out the registry storage of TurfTable. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs]TurfTable An empty table is two zero byte values in a row. QuickFix: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs] TurfTable=hex(7):00,00 EndQuickFix: Put the above 4 lines into TurfTable.reg file. Stop the IMC. Import it into the registry. Start the IMC. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and it still rejects this message. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Check for @aa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message. You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out for other details. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
Be advised that you cannot use the new biggie sized PST files (unicode) for cache mode one Exchange 5.5 (It won't let you). The result of this is that it will create a 2g limited pst file, and if your mailbox is over about 1.5g (pst's take more space to save the messages) it will die and you will have to disable cache mode until you get your mailbox on the server well below 2g. Tom -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode. I am advised that it works with back versions of Exchange, though I haven't personally verified it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 all maybe somebody out there is in a similar predicament. I have a user who is using Outlook XP/2002 and they are connecting to my Exchange server via a VPN connection. There is no way in He** that I am going to setup a pop3 or Imap connection point for them. Every so often this user starts getting slow response times. A dialog box pops up and tries to establish a connection with the exchange server. I have users who have a similar setup. But they are using Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 and they don't experience the same delays. This user lives out in California but when they came to Atlanta they were experiencing the same thing. Exchange 5.5 has the latest service pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for every email account you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop Microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? Exchange 5.5 has the lastest serivce pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exhchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for evey email acount you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions
Too bad they don't support Exchange 5.5 with these new versions. I read somewhere that 40% of exchange servers are still on 5.5. I am stuck on 2.18 here. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions 3.5 And I have version for in the lab - it has some amazing features. I think my favorite is still Sybari Antigen, but this SAV 4 is great in its own way. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Fyodorov, Andrey Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions What version of SAV is that? I don't think you can do anything like that with the Exchange 5.5 antivirus or the latest smtp gateway antivirus. Tom -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Never mind. Got it working. I was trying to stick the expression into the Subject Line filter. Instead I had to stick it into the Spam Rule/Subject Line. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Hello, I am trying to configure NAVEX to scan message subject lines with regular expressions but it is not quite understanding me (or am I doing something wrong?) I am trying to give it this expression: (\([Nn]ew \)|\([Ll]ast \)|\([Ll]atest \)|\([Nn]ewest \)|\([Cc]urrent \))(\([Mm]icrosoft \)|\([Nn]et \)|\([Ii]nternet \)|\([Nn]etwork \))*(\([Ss]ecurity \)|\([Cc]ritical \))*(\([Uu]pdate\)|\([Pp]atch\)|\([Pp]ack\)|\([Uu]pgrade\)) When I click Save, NAVEX breaks up this string into a bunch of smaller strings. Am I expecting too much from NAVEX? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions
What version of SAV is that? I don't think you can do anything like that with the Exchange 5.5 antivirus or the latest smtp gateway antivirus. Tom -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Never mind. Got it working. I was trying to stick the expression into the Subject Line filter. Instead I had to stick it into the Spam Rule/Subject Line. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Hello, I am trying to configure NAVEX to scan message subject lines with regular expressions but it is not quite understanding me (or am I doing something wrong?) I am trying to give it this expression: (\([Nn]ew \)|\([Ll]ast \)|\([Ll]atest \)|\([Nn]ewest \)|\([Cc]urrent \))(\([Mm]icrosoft \)|\([Nn]et \)|\([Ii]nternet \)|\([Nn]etwork \))*(\([Ss]ecurity \)|\([Cc]ritical \))*(\([Uu]pdate\)|\([Pp]atch\)|\([Pp]ack\)|\([Uu]pgrade\)) When I click Save, NAVEX breaks up this string into a bunch of smaller strings. Am I expecting too much from NAVEX? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003. I am using the final released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop Manager 3.6.0.54. I used to have an older version of the desktop manager which did NOT work with outlook 2003. Tom -Original Message- From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support. Ryan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on our client systems. My question is... Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. Thanks Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot off the Fixes....
MS03-046 is listed as critical and involves somebody sending bogus data to your smtp port. In our case, the smtp port of our exchange server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus gateway and then to the exchange machine. In this scenario, the bogus smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server. If your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a hurry to load that patch. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hot off the Fixes Anyone applied these yet? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions changing on pickup directory
What if you turn on security event logging? Maybe that will log the change in permissions and tell you when and what user account did it? Tom -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions changing on pickup directory Well, I kinda hacked a solution into place... Just running a cacls against it every few hours with scheduled tasks... Not the nicest way to do it... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions changing on pickup directory I have a couple of webpages using CDO to send mail. For them to work, I have to give IWAM_server write access to the pickup directory of my Exch2k-SP3 server. So I give IWAM those rights and the pages work fine. However, we try out the webpage again a few hours later, and we get an access denied error. So I look at the permissions on the pickup directory and see that IWAM has been removed. I assume Exchange has repermissioned pickup to be tighter. So I tried changing it again (and unchecking inherit permissions from parent..), and again it works for a while before breaking. Am I supposed to be doing this a different way? Thanks! There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who do not. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
Did you check out this article?? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;820852 Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1) I am a little too use to Veritas and Ex 5.5 so I am new to the 'STM' file and the backup procedures of Exchange2K3 (same as 2000 it appears). I am trying to backup using NTBackup to a disk, all the rest of the backup completes but I can not get the Exchange portion to backup correctly. It appears from the log, I get the volumes and (based on size) what appears to be the Public folders but I can't seem to get the Private store to backup. At the very bottom (pasted below) is where it fails. I've searched for the error in the 'Q' articles, I don't seem to find anything (looking in Exchange2000 kB's). Maybe it's just a RC bug... -Original Message- To: Finch Brett Subject: Full Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: File Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup (via shadow copy) of C: C_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:25. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 591 Files: 3588 Bytes: 182,742,183 Time: 3 minutes and 40 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of D: D_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 150 Files: 520 Bytes: 51,624,632 Time: 12 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of F: F_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #3 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Directories: 263 Files: 4262 Bytes: 407,445,513 Time: 1 minute and 40 seconds Backup of U: \\homeserver\homeshare$ Backup set #4 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 101 Files: 2706 Bytes: 116,742,999 Time: 1 minute and 7 seconds Backup of HOMESERVER\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group Backup set #5 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Backup is already active. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupSetup()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Functions called in an invalid sequence. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupClose()' additional data '-' The operation was ended. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 0 Files: 0 Bytes: 0 Time: 1 second -- The operation did not successfully complete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves completed, but....
I had this same problem moving from an NT4/EX55 server to a new WIN2k/EX55 server using move mailbox. After backing up the affected mailboxes with EXMERGE, I tried moving one back to the old server. If I remember correctly, the move mailbox function saw the bogus empty mailbox on the old server and deleted it (and then didn't bother moving it because of the error). This happened to about 5 mailboxes out of 250. Tom -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but First, even though these mailboxes are duplicated, is the user able to open it ok and access all their items? If so, maybe just run the Cleanup Agent on the old server. Another suggestion might be to try and move the mailbox back. It should error out, and may remove the orphaned item for you. If it works, then check the new server and see if it shows up. If not, move it back to the new server. Have you checked Technet (KB) at all? Orphaned Mailbox maybe? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:30 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Mailbox moves completed, but Subject: Mailbox moves completed, but Good afternoon, I have completed moving 1700+ mailboxes from one server to the other. We are using Outlook 98 Exchange Windows 2000. After the moves were completed I have a few stray mailboxes that are hanging around that are duplicated on the two servers. Under total K they show 0K, even though the mailbox on the correct server (the one moved to) show the correct space 58,098K. I am afraid if we delete the mailbox on the almost empty server, we will delete the real mailbox. So we don't want to do that. We could dump the mailbox to a PST, delete the mailbox and restore the mailbox, but that would cause problems because all communications to the old mailbox would be severed and people couldn't do replies to the eMAILs that are sitting in the mailbox. Meetings couldn't be canceled. What a quandary. What do we do? Just turn off the server and clean it off.. I don't think so. Thanks for any help you might have. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves completed, but....
Did you try moving one back? I think that will delete the empty one and just quit without moving it (and thus fixing the problem). Tom -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but We are on Exchange 5.5. I used the Exchange Administrator -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but That would be the Exchange System Manager. The same thing you probably used to move the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but I am sorry. What is ESM? I do not believe I have every used it? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but Go to ESM, browse to information store/Mailboxes, right click on the Maiboxes and select Run Cleanup Agent. Better now? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Duncan Scott Subject: Mailbox moves completed, but Good afternoon, I have completed moving 1700+ mailboxes from one server to the other. We are using Outlook 98 Exchange Windows 2000. After the moves were completed I have a few stray mailboxes that are hanging around that are duplicated on the two servers. Under total K they show 0K, even though the mailbox on the correct server (the one moved to) show the correct space 58,098K. I am afraid if we delete the mailbox on the almost empty server, we will delete the real mailbox. So we don't want to do that. We could dump the mailbox to a PST, delete the mailbox and restore the mailbox, but that would cause problems because all communications to the old mailbox would be severed and people couldn't do replies to the eMAILs that are sitting in the mailbox. Meetings couldn't be canceled. What a quandary. What do we do? Just turn off the server and clean it off.. I don't think so. Thanks for any help you might have. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
I just installed Office 2003 final from MSDN and was able to export my whole mailbox to a PST. It shows up as 1.8Gig on the exchange 5.5 server, and the PST file is 3.5Gig. Tom -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Everything will fail on a mailbox that's over two gbytes that pushes the data to a pst file. Outlook 11 is supposed to have fixed this, though. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:33 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Brick Level Backup Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge fails on mailboxes over 2gig... Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brick Level Backup Hi all What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores. Any advice welcome. Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
I always get errors in the exmerge log that I assume were due to antivirus (NAV for exchange 5.5) slowing things down. Do you have to stop AV to run this? Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup I don't do that. Here's the basics of what I do: Exmerge (with various command line switches that I'm too lazy to look up right now). Cd \exmergedata Del pst.9.zip Ren pst.8.zip pst.9.zip Ren pst.7.zip pst.8.zip .. Ren pst.zip pst.1.zip Zip -m -9 pst.zip *.pst This is in a batch file that gets run nightly via the scheduler. I keep 10 days of snapshots of select mailboxes. Customer is happy, it was easy to script, and it didn't cost anything other than a bit of disk space. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup But if you keep on dumping new data into the same PST, eventually it will grow quite large, even if your online mailbox limit is low. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup This is true. I've never worked with an Exchange system where the mailbox limits were set anywhere near 2GB, so it's never been an issue for me. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge fails on mailboxes over 2gig... Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brick Level Backup Hi all What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores. Any advice welcome. Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
We are running exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k sp3 server. I have been using
outlook 2003 beta for a long time (I now have the final version installed)
and apparently it has left some garbage in my inbox and the administrators
(which I also open with my profile).
I only found out about this when I installed BE 9.0 on the server (I had
been using NTBACKUP) and accidentally did a mailbox (BRICK) backup (bless me
father for I have sinned, my last full backup was yesterday). The
information store backup runs without problems, but the brick backup logs
these failures:
Backup - \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft
Exchange Mailboxes\Administrator [administrator]Top of Information
StoreFrom
AdminN
Notification: Inbound Mail Failure is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom
[toma]FinderUnread
Mail
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom [toma]Top of
Information
StoreInbox
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a
corrupt
file.
This file cannot verify.
I have tried emptying my inbox but it still finds the corrupt message
there. Short of deleting my account and recreating it (which will be my
last resort) does anyone have suggestions for how to delete these things?
OWA does not see them either.
Tom
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
RE: Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
That is a good possibility. I'll try to exmerge it and see if that
generates any errors. I did download the latest build from Veritas instead
of installing the older build off of the CD.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
So, the only thing that sees a bad message is the brick level backup? I's
just stop doing it. It's certainly possible that OL2003 has items that
BE9.0 doesn't understand.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
We are running exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k sp3 server. I have been using
outlook 2003 beta for a long time (I now have the final version installed)
and apparently it has left some garbage in my inbox and the administrators
(which I also open with my profile).
I only found out about this when I installed BE 9.0 on the server (I had
been using NTBACKUP) and accidentally did a mailbox (BRICK) backup (bless me
father for I have sinned, my last full backup was yesterday). The
information store backup runs without problems, but the brick backup logs
these failures:
Backup - \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft
Exchange Mailboxes\Administrator [administrator]Top of Information
StoreFrom
AdminN
Notification: Inbound Mail Failure is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom
[toma]FinderUnread
Mail
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom [toma]Top of
Information
StoreInbox
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a
corrupt
file.
This file cannot verify.
I have tried emptying my inbox but it still finds the corrupt message
there. Short of deleting my account and recreating it (which will be my
last resort) does anyone have suggestions for how to delete these things?
OWA does not see them either.
Tom
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S ^jZ 2G(L\xfyb))
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Extracting to pst
How much $ is this software?? -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Extracting to pst Nope, I think the number of mailboxes you can read is based on the licenses you purchased. It is a great piece of software. One of my 5.5 customers does snapshot backups to a NAS and they use it all the time. - Jim sends -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:20 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Extracting to pst Subject: RE: Extracting to pst I thought the software would only read mailbox stores of up to 250 users! Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 September 2003 12:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Extracting to pst Why not do increments of 250? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Extracting to pst Vitamin Fortified Power Control ? - Original Message - From: Aaron Shimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:20 AM Subject: Extracting to pst Hi all I have Power Control which I use to extract mailboxes when necessary. But my version only works up to 250 mailboxes. What would you recommend for 250+ mailboxes? Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
Exmerge fails on mailboxes over 2gig... Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brick Level Backup Hi all What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores. Any advice welcome. Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 0 items, 7 unread
I have 7 pink elephants in my cube, but nobody else can see them. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread User reports - that helped. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread If you right-click the folder and choose mark all as read, what happens? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Followup on OWA suddenly died thread
Last Friday I reported that all of the sudden our Exchange 5.5 OWA server started crashing with ASP 0115 errors. Andy David (the godlike one) immediately zeroed in on my usage of Outlook 2003 and it's effect. While researching the problem I found that it was only MY mailbox that would crash it, so I started to clean out my inbox (completely emptying it) and also emptying my deleted items folder which was pretty full. I then got the patch from MS by calling PSS and having them email it to me. I tried a before test but I could no longer crash OWA with my cleaned up inbox. I applied the CDO patch ONLY to my OWA server, not to the Exchange mail server. I did this because rebooting the OWA server is no big problem, but rebooting the exchange server should probably only be done after hours. So I can't verify that the patch works, but it probably does. I'm not going to load up my inbox again just to see. The OWA server has been running fine since Friday. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
There were 99 files in there and some were from 1999. Even though I had stopped web publishing in services, it could not delete the temp file from my session untill I killed inetinfo.exe with task manager. After restarting web publishing services, it started to come up but stalled with my inbox screen with frames set up but blank. I shut down and I'm running a low level disk diag (since I saw some atapi errors in the log from a few weeks ago) and then I'll try it again in case a full reboot is better than just restarting inetinfo. Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' - Get ting Wierder and Wierder
I have now determined that after cleaning out the webtemp directory and rebooting, I can access other peoples mailboxes without crashing OWA. Once I try to access mine, it (inetinfo.exe) dies trying to render my inbox. I think I will clean out my inbox and see what happens next. I have been searching google for related problams and have found several people with very similar problems and no solution ever posted. Microsoft suggested to one admin to just upgrade to Exchange 2000 and that would probably fix his problem. I guess if I upgraded my '89 Toyota Corolla to a '04 model that would probably fix the nasty carburettor problems it has too... Tom -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Ok, you got me... I am the bad user who crashes OWA when I access my own inbox, and I am running a beta (build 5329) of Outlook 2003. Is there a fix? (did I mention before that Andy David is God Like??) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Thanks. Looks like I need to call PSS to get the file. The weird thing is that I have been running Office beta for a long long time and this problem just cropped up 2 days ago. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;818709 Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Posted At: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:19 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Ok, you got me... I am the bad user who crashes OWA when I access my own inbox, and I am running a beta (build 5329) of Outlook 2003. Is there a fix? (did I mention before that Andy David is God Like??) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Once I have accessed my mailbox on the exchange server with outlook 2003 I have apparently infected it with the PR_FREEBUSY_ENTRYIDS property, a fourth field in something that previously had 3. I would have to delete my mailbox and create a new one to get rid of the 4th field. And once I do that, some other rogue user will install Outlook 2003 and crash it again. -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Don't you love it when, You tell the Doctor it hurts to do that, then he says Then don't do that!. Then have you try OL2000 or OL2002? Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Ok, you got me... I am the bad user who crashes OWA when I access my own inbox, and I am running a beta (build 5329) of Outlook 2003. Is there a fix? (did I mention before that Andy David is God Like??) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
We have 3 1/2 layers: 1- custom smap based linux box with spam filtering, attachment blocking, and some custom blocking of known bad stuff (this one is the 1/2 since it doesn't really scan for known viruses, just virus like emails) 2- Symantec Antivirus for SMTP Gateways: This is a separate machine that processes all inbound mail for our exchange server. 3- Symantec Antivirus for Exchange: Runs on the exchange server and scans everything (not just inbound from the internet). 4- Symantec Client Antivirus: All clients have this installed and if 1,2 and 3 fail this may save us. Tom -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
OK you win. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 3 Layers of Virus protection. 42. - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:40 AM Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. We use 3. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DEU Resume
I just gone one too. And the headers look legit: Received: from ops.xetron.com ([192.168.1.121]) by s3cin.xetron.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id RHLTYYTF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:08:21 -0400 Received: from fw.xetron.com ([192.168.1.1]) by ops.xetron.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2003081918073707859 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:37 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fw.xetron.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h7JM7aju024258 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:36 -0400 Received: from cpocwcp.hua.army.mil(138.27.195.254) by fw.xetron.com via smap (V2.1) id xma024249; Tue, 19 Aug 03 18:07:26 -0400 Received: by cpocwcp.hua.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id Q8GWXC9H; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: CPOCWCP DEU [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DEU Resume Received Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-Envfrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bayes: 0.00 0.370709 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I got the same thing!! Thought it might be the new email virus, but it had no attachment. Just got another as I write this!!! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DEU Resume Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you never sent to them? About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and the DD-214. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
There is no white list, only a black list. -Original Message- From: Cary, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Can you configure this (Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways) to only allow specific extensions? Basically block all by default except for the extensions you put on a white list? -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DEU Resume
Yes, I think you have figured it out. Every time I make a post to this list I get another email from the Army. Tom -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I think that maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to this list, and has an autoreply rule. It's probably not sobig related at all. -Peter -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I just gone one too. And the headers look legit: Received: from ops.xetron.com ([192.168.1.121]) by s3cin.xetron.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id RHLTYYTF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:08:21 -0400 Received: from fw.xetron.com ([192.168.1.1]) by ops.xetron.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2003081918073707859 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:37 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fw.xetron.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h7JM7aju024258 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:36 -0400 Received: from cpocwcp.hua.army.mil(138.27.195.254) by fw.xetron.com via smap (V2.1) id xma024249; Tue, 19 Aug 03 18:07:26 -0400 Received: by cpocwcp.hua.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id Q8GWXC9H; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: CPOCWCP DEU [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DEU Resume Received Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-Envfrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bayes: 0.00 0.370709 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I got the same thing!! Thought it might be the new email virus, but it had no attachment. Just got another as I write this!!! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DEU Resume Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you never sent to them? About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and the DD-214. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST version - revisited
I have had good luck repairing bad (over 2G) pst files by using ontrack's easyrecovery utility. I bought the version that does all types of office files (doc, xls, mdb, pst) as well as doing low level hard disk recovery and it was about $500. You can get the various pieces for less. I did try the Microsoft approved method, which was to run a utility that chops off the file at 2G (you have to experiment to find out how much). Chopped off data is lost forever. Then you run scanpst and it can recover some of the data, but in the one I tried it lost all the folder names (it had to make up new names). Using easyrecovery resulted in two good PST's (it was over 2g so the output couldn't fit into one). Everything looked fine in the recovered PST files. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST version - revisited Ok not quite figured out. PST's are on cd. Copied to hdd, yes I remembered to uncheck RO. Still not able to access them. Tried scanpst. Not working very well. Any other ideas? TIA, Ali -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:48 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: PST version Subject: RE: PST version Actually, I figured it out... I had opened them with ol2003beta a while back. I'll just wait til the audit is over and re-install officexp. b thanks... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:31 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: PST version Subject: Re: PST version Maybe it isn't? Did you try running scanpst against it. From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PST version Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:03:23 -0400 Had to rebuild... had office XP, now have office2k. Trying to open my .PST. When I try to add it to the service, a pop-up so thoughtfully informs me: Exchange.PST is not a personal folders store. No, it is not checked read-only. Ideas? TIA, Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any problems. Now the errors are occurring about every second while the NAV service is running. I stopped NAV for now and have not seen any errors in the event log for about 15 minutes now (including blackberry). Has anyone seen this or does anyone have suggestions for getting NAV running again?? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any problems. Now the errors are occurring about every second while the NAV service is running. I stopped NAV for now and have not seen any errors in the event log for about 15 minutes now (including blackberry). Has anyone seen this or does anyone have suggestions for getting NAV running again?? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
It's doing it again... After the below changes NAV ran for about 10 minutes and then gave me the error messages once. It then ran another 10 minutes and started giving me the errors about every 2 minutes. I shut down NAV again for a while. I guess I'll start it up again later tonight and see how it goes. Symantec will probably have newer definitions available by then. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any problems. Now the errors are occurring about every second while the NAV service is running. I stopped NAV for now and have not seen any errors in the event log for about 15 minutes now (including blackberry). Has anyone seen this or does anyone have suggestions for getting NAV running again?? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
Mapi/vapi -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions What mode are you running in? MAPI? MAPI/VAPI? Nate -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 12:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... It's doing it again... After the below changes NAV ran for about 10 minutes and then gave me the error messages once. It then ran another 10 minutes and started giving me the errors about every 2 minutes. I shut down NAV again for a while. I guess I'll start it up again later tonight and see how it goes. Symantec will probably have newer definitions available by then. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
I haven't run in mapi only mode since that was the only way it had. I did find one KB article on symantecs site and they blamed the memory allocation problem on exchange and just said to run perfwiz. I guess I'll run perfwiz tonight after everyone goes home and see if new definitions came out since then. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Have you tried it in MAPI only mode? Are there any other potentially related events in the App or Sys logs? Another possibility looming here is to uninstall and reinstall NAV for Exchange. -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 13:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... Mapi/vapi -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions What mode are you running in? MAPI? MAPI/VAPI? Nate -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 12:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... It's doing it again... After the below changes NAV ran for about 10 minutes and then gave me the error messages once. It then ran another 10 minutes and started giving me the errors about every 2 minutes. I shut down NAV again for a while. I guess I'll start it up again later tonight and see how it goes. Symantec will probably have newer definitions available by then. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running
RE: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth.
This could be done with a separate machine that receives mail for your domain and only relays valid addresses to you. In order to help with the bandwidth problem, this machine would have to be somewhere that did not have a bandwidth limitation. Tom -Original Message- From: IT1(SW) Biesecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi everyone. I'm new to this group so here's a quick introduction. I'm a network Administrator in the US NAVY, currently on board the USS DEYO. My organization contains about 350 people so it is actually a fairly small network. While we are underway (as we are now), my Internet connection bandwidth is approximately 14 Kbps. I manage everything on my network fairly well, but there are certain things with Exchange 5.5 that I just can't seem to figure out. That's _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black-hole mailbox
Does it explode or implode?? I think this might be in the FAQ or some Q article... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions You can't clean out a black hole. Stuff goes in and never comes out. But after too much stuff goes in, some theories go, the thing explodes. That's probably where all those messages that have as the sender come from. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nikki Peterson Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Black-hole mailbox Black Hole? Where does the message go? Does this Black hole need to be cleaned out? Nikki _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook connect problem with Exchange Server
If nothing else helps, try removing the TCP/IP protocol and then re-adding it. Even though you can ping OK this sometimes fixes outlook connection problems. Tom -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, I have problem with outlook to access an exchange server I do know how to set outlook up to access an exchange server. I have 30 workstations accessing it now, it is only this one that will not connect. Everytime I hit Check Name I get the error - Outlook could not log on. Check to make sure you are connected to the network and are using the proper server mailbox name. The Microsoft Exchange Address Bool was unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. Can ping the Exchange server by name and by IP. Try add winnt\system32\drivers\etc in the HOSTS file give a line for exchange: IP ADDRESSCOMPUTER_NAME Still can't connect System: Windows 2000 Workstation OutlookXP Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Anyone got another solution? Thanks Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX55: Message processing failed because there is not enough avail able memory
On an exchange 5.5 sp4 server running on win2k, the IMC shut down because the IS complained that: Message processing failed because there is not enough available memory (EVENT ID 12800). This was followed by events 4182 and 4102 (ims shutting down due to serious error i.e. 12800) There was one message in the inbound directory of the IMC and it would not start until I removed that message. There was nothing unusual about that message, it was one that BLAT had generated from a backup process I have scheduled. After that restart, it ran for a while and then choked on two other messages. One was another BLAT message and the third was a MPEG movie somebody had mailed in (probably a funny one, I haven't looked at it). All 3 messages were about 10k bytes in length. MS has a knowledgebase article about this problem: (or something very close) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q325939 Which says: If the Internet Mail Service receives a malformed inbound Internet message, the Internet Mail Service may log event ID 12800, 4182, 4102, and 1001 error messages in the Application event log, and then stop responding. RESOLUTION A supported fix is now available from Microsoft, but it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in this article. Apply it only to computers that are experiencing this specific problem. The fix is a new store.exe version 5.5.2656.60. I am currently running store.exe 5.5.2654.50 (a post sp4 fix). After zapping those 3 emails, the IMC has been running for about an hour now with no problems (and it has never had a problem before). Does anyone have any insight on this problem? If it happens again I will call MS and request the patch, as it is not available for download. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black-hole mailbox
In exchange 5.5, you can create a distribution list with no members that will act as a black hole. I suspect you might be able to do the same with 2000. Tom -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions In Exchange 5.5 it was easy to create a mailbox that was simply a black-hole. This was done by selecting to forward the mail for that mailbox to an alternate address, but leaving the address field blank. Is this possible in Exchange 2k? If I select the forwarding address option and don't select an address (contact) then it reverts the setting. Anyone know a way to create a black-hole for mail with Exch2K? Thanks, -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX55: problem routing by email domain to multiple mail hosts
On our Exchange 5.5 server we are using DNS for most outbound mail to determine where the message is routed to. We have a VPN link with another division that we use to encrypt emails over the internet. It appears that you can only specify a single address to route the mail to per domain. Is there some way to have it try multiple addresses in the event of a failure? The only thing I can think of is to have our DNS person hard code these special routes into the MX records so we do not end up using the MX records on the root servers. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server
Try removing and re-adding the TCP/IP protocol. We had a problem with outlook not being able to connect to our exchange 5.5 server on machines that had been ghosted and sysprepped. Everything else worked (except outlook/exchange) and I found a MS Knowledgebase article that suggested removing/reinstalling TCP/IP which solved the problem. Tom Alverson -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Win2K Adv Server, SP3 + patches Exchange 2000 SP3 -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server What OS is the Exch? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 February 2003 21:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server I have a customer who has been connecting to our Exchange servers just fine with MAPI Outlook, across the Internet. They have been receiving new PCs from Dell that are already preconfigured with Windows XP SP1. And for some reason users on those PCs cannot connect to Exchange anymore. I asked him to check the XP's built-in firewall. He says it is disabled. I did an RPC Ping test with him. From old PCs RPC Ping worked fine. But it failed on the new XP SP1 PCs. What else could there be wrong with XP SP1 that would kill RPCs? Thanks for any ideas! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PST over 2Gig repair notes...
We had a user try to clean up his server mailbox by dragging everything into his PST. He is using Outlook 2000, which was quite happy to stuff messages into the PST until it was destroyed. The error message you get is to try the inbox repair tool. I found the one that came with the office 11 beta (that was part of the free exchange 2003 cd pack) hoping it might be better than older versions. It was not. It could not do any good so I then used the 2Gig chop off tool (PST2gb.exe). This tool basically says try chopping off part of the file and see if scanpst will work. If it doesn't, they try chopping off a little more and repeat... Well once I chopped off enough for scanpst to work it came up with a repaired PST that looked pretty grim. There were some folders with made up folder names, and some subfolders that still had their original names. I googled around a little looking for pst repair and downloaded ONTRACK's file repair thing (demo). The demo worked its way through the PST and then claimed to have repaired a bunch of folders (with the correct names) on the original oversized PST (no chopping required). I then shelled out $500 for the full ONTRACK easyrecovery pro thing (could have just bought the file recovery part for $340) and let it work. It produced one 2G pst and one smaller pst that looked pretty good. I gave those back to the user and haven't heard any complaints yet about lost mail etc, so it looks like the utility is pretty good. Is there any way to prevent Outlook 2000 from overstuffing a PST?? I am pretty sure that Outlook 2002 pops up a warning or something when you are about to get into trouble. It seems like this huge flaw in outlook should have been addressed by a service pack. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blackberry still (partially) down?
We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving messages. Mine started working last night at about 8:00pm. A few were fixed today by doing a master reset (paperclip in the hole in the back) and then going to options/network settings and clicking the wheel and choosing register now. There are still 2 units that have messages pending. Aether tech support claims that some are still backlogged and we should just wait a while. They cannot even receive APB's or pin to pin messages (in addition to not receiving messages from the blackberry enterprise server). Maybe these two will fix themselves by Monday... Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 11 beta broke my Blackberry Intellisync???
I got the free CD set (paid for shipping) with exchange2003, server2003 and office2003 betas. I loaded the office beta on my desktop PC and now (maybe coincidentally or not) I can no longer sync in the cradle. When I go to the PIM settings it will not allow me to select outlook as a choice (the OK button is greyed out) for the notepad, mail or tasks. The calendar is still set to wireless sync which is working. Our BES server is 2.1 sp5 and I just loaded the 3.5a desktop on my pc to see if that helped (it did not). I did load the 3.5 desktop on another pc with office 2000 loaded and the unit will sync up fine on that machine. Can anyone confirm that the problem is between office 11 beta and the blackberry desktop?? I'm sure Aether would just tell me to uninstall the beta software. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry still (partially) down?
Aether is the provider and the units are 957's with wireless service provided by Cingular. Tom -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are those folks on Bell South? We have a user who just contacted me this morning to tell me her Blackberry isn't receiving; I'm pretty sure she's a Bell South connected customer. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving messages. Mine started working last night at about 8:00pm. A few were fixed today by doing a master reset (paperclip in the hole in the back) and then going to options/network settings and clicking the wheel and choosing register now. There are still 2 units that have messages pending. Aether tech support claims that some are still backlogged and we should just wait a while. They cannot even receive APB's or pin to pin messages (in addition to not receiving messages from the blackberry enterprise server). Maybe these two will fix themselves by Monday... Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connect to exchange over vpn
Maybe he has enabled the built in XP (software) firewall and that is interfering?? Tom -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I have problem with a user that is using vpn connection to read his email off our server. He can log into the vpn and access his email but when he tries to send he recieves the following message: Microsoft Outlook Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. The wierd thing is when I set him up here at my office it worked fine also it worked on his cable modem at home. Then when he went to his new office with a new dsl line he started to recieve this message. I looked up the error on google and one suggestion was to remove TCP/IP and add it again. This worked for about 5 hours and the next day he came to the office the same error popped up. I thought the problem might be the dsl line so I had him troubleshoot it with his service provider. They recommended that he upgrade his service to a faster speed. I didnt think this was the issue so I told him to test it out on another internet connection and he did and got the same error. I have about 25 users that connect to vpn and access their email and he is the only one having the problem. He uses windows xp pro and he is trying to connect to exchange server 5.5 sp4 on windows nt 4.0 sp6. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connect to exchange over vpn
It could also be an MTU problem (see recent discussion on the list). If it is MTU related, you keep pinging with some command line options (no frag and vary the ping packet size) and see how large you can make the packet before it fails. Then download and use doctor-tcp to set the MTU for that interface. Dr-tcp just makes it easy to set the registry for the custom MTU size. The MTU setting is in a registry tree below the name of the network interface (which varies from machine to machine) so you can't just merge a REG file to set the MTU. Tom -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Maybe he has enabled the built in XP (software) firewall and that is interfering?? Tom -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I have problem with a user that is using vpn connection to read his email off our server. He can log into the vpn and access his email but when he tries to send he recieves the following message: Microsoft Outlook Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. The wierd thing is when I set him up here at my office it worked fine also it worked on his cable modem at home. Then when he went to his new office with a new dsl line he started to recieve this message. I looked up the error on google and one suggestion was to remove TCP/IP and add it again. This worked for about 5 hours and the next day he came to the office the same error popped up. I thought the problem might be the dsl line so I had him troubleshoot it with his service provider. They recommended that he upgrade his service to a faster speed. I didnt think this was the issue so I told him to test it out on another internet connection and he did and got the same error. I have about 25 users that connect to vpn and access their email and he is the only one having the problem. He uses windows xp pro and he is trying to connect to exchange server 5.5 sp4 on windows nt 4.0 sp6. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blackberry/Cingular down
We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
You forgot to edit out where Tony Hlabse said B_st_rds (see below) Tom (trying not to offend Mr. Trend) -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange2003 Thanks, Tom. I realized that I sounded like a newb asking that, but I only recently began administering Windows and so never ordered anything from them. What did I say to offend the content filter at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Allison M. Wittstock Subject = Re: Exchange2003 Delivery Time = January 30, 2003 (Thursday) 06:44:31 Policy = Sexual Discrimination Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:12 pm, Alverson, Tom wrote: No catch, no survey. I just had to pay for the shipping (about $10 ??) with a credit card. Not sure if they ship everywhere. Check it out at: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/beta.asp where you can download Exchange 2003 but not Outlook http://microsoft.order-5.com/exchangetitaniumbeta/routing.asp?type=1 Link on the above page to order the CD with both exchange2003 and outlook 11 (link is not working right now). Tom -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange2003 Do you know if they will ship anywhere in the world? I am in Berlin. Also, is there a catch? Like having to fill out a survey, and if you don't they will charge you $100? On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:11 pm, you wrote: I just got an email that my free CD shipped yesterday with an Airborne tracking number. Tom -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bxstxrds -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
I just got an email that my free CD shipped yesterday with an Airborne tracking number. Tom -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bastards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
No catch, no survey. I just had to pay for the shipping (about $10 ??) with a credit card. Not sure if they ship everywhere. Check it out at: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/beta.asp where you can download Exchange 2003 but not Outlook http://microsoft.order-5.com/exchangetitaniumbeta/routing.asp?type=1 Link on the above page to order the CD with both exchange2003 and outlook 11 (link is not working right now). Tom -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange2003 Do you know if they will ship anywhere in the world? I am in Berlin. Also, is there a catch? Like having to fill out a survey, and if you don't they will charge you $100? On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:11 pm, you wrote: I just got an email that my free CD shipped yesterday with an Airborne tracking number. Tom -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bxstxrds -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BE 9
Be advised that the MSDE (Sql server) that ships with BE9 is the old unpatched vulnerable code. If you install BE9 you should immediately update the ssnetlib.dll file that they install or you could become part of the latest SQL virus party. I know this because I just installed the BE9 eval and then the next day I was scanning for the SQL vulnerability with EEYE's free utility and It found the machine with BE9 on it. There is an app note on the Veritas web site admitting the problem and telling you to go to Microsoft for the patches. Tom Alverson -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BE 9 I am using it now. It shaved about 20% off our typical enterprise backup times. I like the ability to modify the order in which my machines are backup up. If 8.6 had it - I never found it... I also like the interface better. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BE 9 Anyone upgrading to Backup Exec 9.0 It looks like it has some real good advantages and I am just looking for some opinions Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
Our PRIV.MDB is about 35Gig. On our old server we used Backup Exec 7.3 (w/exchange option) and a Sony AIT tape drive that stores 35/70G of data. On our new replacement server (same PRIV being moved over) we are using NTBACKUP to both tape and hard drive. I do the hard drive backup first, then back up to an HP Ultrium 100/200G drive. The hard drive is on the same machine and is about twice as fast as the tape backup. We are using the half-height HP drive which is theoretically slower than the full height one. Tom Alverson -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No originator mesages
Is there any limit to how many email addresses you can assign to the DL?? Tom -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No originator mesages You need a black hole DL. Create a hidden DL with no members and give it all the long dead SMTP addresses that are attracting all the spam. Then the messages won't bounce because the addresses will be valid, but because there are no list members the message won't be delivered to anyone. -Peter -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No originator mesages I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to keep no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue? I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here in 3 years. Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can even get that far. I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no originator. I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck. Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of these but can't. Any suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller E-Mail Administrator BSPMLAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No originator messages
Because I watch the yellow bar on the performance monitor (outbound IMC) to make sure it isn't too big. Sometimes it indicates a real problem sending normal mail and other times it just shows that some spammer just sent us a whole bunch of bad emails that it is trying to NDR. Tom -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Why do we need this? On 1/22/03 15:06, Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What we really need is a separate set of retry options for NDR's. Have it try an NDR once or twice and then give up without notifying your of its failure to deliver the NDR (instead of the normal retry sequence for real mail). TOm -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No originator messages Charles, I think what Chris is trying to say is, that's what an NDR is...REFUSING to accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED], because it doesn't exist, and trying to deliver notification of that fact to the original recipient. Exchange sends those notifications back to the originator with as the sender. What she's asking for is a way to eliminate sending NDRs to nonexistant return addresses, which is why she sees e-mail backed up in the outbound Q, addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], from . Many times, those SPAM e-mails are sent to what used to be legitimate SMTP addresses within the organization, but which have since been deleted, due to an employee leaving the company. Happens to me every day. So...Pete's initial suggestion to add the SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Blackhole DL when the employee leaves the company, is a legitimate and very good suggestion. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No originator messages and refuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what I think she was accepting. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Exchange accepts mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 1/22/03 13:51, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, am i missing something? I've been up all day. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Used Exchange much? On 1/22/03 13:13, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No originator mesages I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to keep no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue? I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here in 3 years. Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can even get that far. I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no originator. I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck. Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of these but can't. Any suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller E-Mail Administrator BSPMLAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX5.5: Move mailbox that is over 2Gig???
I have set up a new Exchange5.5 server to replace an aging 5.5 server. I have been using Exmerge to backup mailboxes to PST files (in addition to the daily backup) before moving mailboxes (just in case). We have a few mailboxes on the old server that are over 2gig in size. Exmerge will not put more than 2gig into the PST files, so I'm a little nervous about moving these biggies without a brick style backup. I will probably end up forcing those users to clean up their inboxes but I was wondering if Move Mailbox would have any issues with these big mailboxes? Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: Move mailbox that is over 2Gig???
Thanks for all the info. I wasn't sure if this was a don't cross the beams, dogs and cats living together(ghostbusters) sort of thing or not . I think I will give exmerge another shot and play with the options. Our 'worst' user has about 3.8gig and it is all in his inbox and sent items (and a lot of it unread). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: Move mailbox that is over 2Gig???
Exmerge was just for a safety backup of the mail. All mailboxes are being moved with the move mailbox function in the Exchange 5.5 admin program. Tom -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: Move mailbox that is over 2Gig??? Agreed. If the server is in the same site and org, always use the move mailbox method. You are blowing your SIS right out the window by using Exmerge. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: Move mailbox that is over 2Gig??? you should read the FAQ and use Ed's method. Then maybe send Ed a beverage of his choice for writing such a helpful tool. bill -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: Move mailbox that is over 2Gig??? I have set up a new Exchange5.5 server to replace an aging 5.5 server. I have been using Exmerge to backup mailboxes to PST files (in addition to the daily backup) before moving mailboxes (just in case). We have a few mailboxes on the old server that are over 2gig in size. Exmerge will not put more than 2gig into the PST files, so I'm a little nervous about moving these biggies without a brick style backup. I will probably end up forcing those users to clean up their inboxes but I was wondering if Move Mailbox would have any issues with these big mailboxes? Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
I have a file server with 8.6 on it and I did not see the feature (backup to disk) at first because you must first create a special file backup folder before it appears as a choice. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? nitpick I believe that only 8.6 supports that feature. - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:59 AM Subject: RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? The newer version of BE (8 onwards) you can backup to disc. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 18:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
Not an issue. The tape drive is an HP Ultrium 100/200G drive that can easily hold our 30G store. -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? The biggest fault I have found with Ntbackup is its lack of support for tape auto-stackers. If that is not a concer for you, I would go with Ntbackup. Dennis -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change to different organization without losing SIS??
From what I understand of the Move Server Wizard and exmerge we would lose SIS (Single Instance Storage) if we used the wizard (or any other method??) to change our organization. (??) We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and our parent company (which we may need to change our organization to someday) is also running 5.5 today. Maybe we need to force everyone to remove their mail from the server (to those robust PST files) before attempting a changeover? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ???
Thanks for all the help! I got the users created with CSVDE. They start life with no passwords and password must be changed at next logon checked. I found an easy way to set all the passwords the same. I downloaded a 30 day eval of Hyena which let me select all the test accounts and uncheck the next logon box in one operation. It also let me set all the passwords at once (all to the same password). Thanks again for all the help. Tom -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? Not true. To set passwords all you need is account administrator rights (or better). === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? To set the passwords, you would need to use impersonation. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? I think the tough point he brought up is he wanted to also set the passwords for each account. My understanding it is not straight forward using scripts for AD. Hence the need for some 3rd party App. - Original Message - From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:05 PM Subject: RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? You can't do it with a csv unless you also write the script that reads the csv. I know I have a script around here somewhere that does it. There's one on our web site that will create a single mailbox. easy to modify for lots. I'll see if I can dig up the one that does lots and post that too. (http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm) All my scripts use perl instead of VB. There are VB samples around too on MSDN and the Comp^h^h^h^hHP ActiveAnswers web site (actually a good little set of scripts is available there). === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:48 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? Subject: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? I have a test server that I am trying to create a bunch of mailboxes (user1, user2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to do some benchmarking on the server. All I want to do is create mailboxes with unique email addresses (which requires an accompanying AD user account I believe) and I would like to also give them some default password if possible. I have been experimenting with CSVDE but so far I have only created disabled accounts which have no exchange mailbox. Does anyone know what the minimum amount of info I can put in the CSV file to accomplish this? Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto
Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ???
I have a test server that I am trying to create a bunch of mailboxes (user1, user2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to do some benchmarking on the server. All I want to do is create mailboxes with unique email addresses (which requires an accompanying AD user account I believe) and I would like to also give them some default password if possible. I have been experimenting with CSVDE but so far I have only created disabled accounts which have no exchange mailbox. Does anyone know what the minimum amount of info I can put in the CSV file to accomplish this? Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ???
I'd hate to have to buy a 3rd party app (usually ) just to do some testing Tom -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? There may be a way via scripting but have found that there are many 3rd party apps. that do this very easily. the tough part was importing the password itself. The 3rd party apps. let you use csv files. But maybe someone else has done this. - Original Message - From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? I have a test server that I am trying to create a bunch of mailboxes (user1, user2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to do some benchmarking on the server. All I want to do is create mailboxes with unique email addresses (which requires an accompanying AD user account I believe) and I would like to also give them some default password if possible. I have been experimenting with CSVDE but so far I have only created disabled accounts which have no exchange mailbox. Does anyone know what the minimum amount of info I can put in the CSV file to accomplish this? Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ???
Loadsim?? Who knew it created accounts???! (Besides Ed). I'll check it out. I would like to create about 1000 accounts for testing. Thanks! Tom -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? When I've needed that, I've written VBScript to do that. You might also investigate LoadSim (Load Simulator). It'll create a whole slew of accounts for you too. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? I have a test server that I am trying to create a bunch of mailboxes (user1, user2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to do some benchmarking on the server. All I want to do is create mailboxes with unique email addresses (which requires an accompanying AD user account I believe) and I would like to also give them some default password if possible. I have been experimenting with CSVDE but so far I have only created disabled accounts which have no exchange mailbox. Does anyone know what the minimum amount of info I can put in the CSV file to accomplish this? Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Move Mailbox only works in one direction???
Same organization, same site, same domain, just different locations so the inbound and outbound internet mail can be controlled. Both exchange servers services are using the same logon (a domain account). No security events are being logged when this fails, and all security failures are set to log. I sucessfully moved all the accounts for the remote users last Friday by doing it from the first site. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5 Move Mailbox only works in one direction??? Tom, Sounds like a permissions issue, either NT or Exchange. Is the remote office in the same domain as you are? Is the remote office in a different site/organization? Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Move Mailbox only works in one direction??? I just added a second exchange 5.5 server to our organization. At first I had it in the lab and just moved my own mailbox to is as a guinea pig. They were both in this building. I then moved my mailbox back to the first server and shipped the second one to a remote office connected by a VPN. At first NAV for exchange wasn't starting due to the changed IP address (they are on a different subnet). I found the old IP in the registry and changed it and now NAV starts. I moved one user right away with no problems but forget which server I did the move on (I remote control the other server). Now today when I tried to move some more users, the progress screen would just flash on the screen for a second and go away. In the event log it just had an ID 1800 error (could not move user doe, john) and no other information or errors. I tried a couple of mailboxes and got the same result (this was on the remote server). I then tried it on the first server and it worked just fine there. Very strange... Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX5.5 Move Mailbox only works in one direction???
I just added a second exchange 5.5 server to our organization. At first I had it in the lab and just moved my own mailbox to is as a guinea pig. They were both in this building. I then moved my mailbox back to the first server and shipped the second one to a remote office connected by a VPN. At first NAV for exchange wasn't starting due to the changed IP address (they are on a different subnet). I found the old IP in the registry and changed it and now NAV starts. I moved one user right away with no problems but forget which server I did the move on (I remote control the other server). Now today when I tried to move some more users, the progress screen would just flash on the screen for a second and go away. In the event log it just had an ID 1800 error (could not move user doe, john) and no other information or errors. I tried a couple of mailboxes and got the same result (this was on the remote server). I then tried it on the first server and it worked just fine there. Very strange... Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
Thanks for your reply. I have not had any problems since making this big container. I did try one foolish thing - I tried to import all these addresses into a single outlook contacts folder. The import was going fine for a few minutes until outlook (2002) exploded (I hope they put me back on the office beta again). When I restarted outlook there were over 29000 addresses in the folder. I then found that there is a 32000ish limit. Seems like outlook should just say Folder Full or something else short of crashing. Tom -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? Not aware of any limit or recommendation for one. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? On an Exchange 5.5 server, what is the maximum number of addresses that can be placed (or are recommended) in a single container? I have set up a single container to put all of the external addresses of our parent company in (whose exchange servers are a separate organinization). Everything seems to be working fine (and pretty fast) with about 75,000 addresses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotmail problems?
Yes, we have a few outbound messages waiting for hotmail to accept them for the last few hours. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hotmail problems? Hi all. I am having intermittent problems sending to Hotmail. Some of the Hotmail servers seem to reject connections. If I send a message 3-4 times, eventually it hits a good Hotmail server and gets delivered. Has anyone else seen such behavior recently? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com Complex Hosting in a Global Environment _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
On an Exchange 5.5 server, what is the maximum number of addresses that can be placed (or are recommended) in a single container? I have set up a single container to put all of the external addresses of our parent company in (whose exchange servers are a separate organinization). Everything seems to be working fine (and pretty fast) with about 75,000 addresses. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
This is completely UN-automated. I manually get the foreign addresses by having a logon onto the parent company exchange network and using a shareware thing called GAL-Exporter (I think it was about $40). GAL exporter can either export individual containers (of which there are way too many to consider doing separately) or the Global list. The exported mailbox info is saved into an Access database file. From Access, I then export the file to a CSV (comma separated variable) file. Before reading this into EXCEL, I first had to split it into two parts because EXCEL can only handle 64000 rows. After reading it into excel, I deleted the columns I did not need, and put the appropriate header line at the top and re-saved it to CSV. I also had to add the string SMTP: to the beginning of each email address (or Target-Address in header-speak). After adding a column of SMTP:'s, I then used a text editor to replace SMTP:, with SMTP: which merged this to the address column. I then used the exchange administrator to import all of these into a single container that I had just created on the server. Tom -Original Message- From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? I'm interested in hearing what tool you're using to keep the external org addresses in sync -- is the the InterOrg tool? We're in discussions with our parent company about this very task. Thanks! Jon -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:39 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? Subject: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? On an Exchange 5.5 server, what is the maximum number of addresses that can be placed (or are recommended) in a single container? I have set up a single container to put all of the external addresses of our parent company in (whose exchange servers are a separate organinization). Everything seems to be working fine (and pretty fast) with about 75,000 addresses. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest NAV for Exchange 5.5 ??
I am running NAVMSE version 2.17 build 75 on my exchange 5.5 server. Are there any newer versions available for exchange 5.5? I have background scanning enabled (and combo mode) and still get errors (from outlook) when sending emails with attachments. Outlook tells me the delivery failed, and the message seems to disappear for a while (does not even show up in sent items) but after a few minutes it does get delivered OK (and then shows up in sent items). I probably just need a faster server as it seems that outlook is timing out while the server struggles to keep up with scanning. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
