Access to Public Folders
We have a just set up one of our customers as clients on our EX2K system. The problem we are having is that the globally available public folders for our staff are now also visilble to these new customers. I have tried creating a group and then via system manager adding this group to the security tab of properties of 'Public Folders' and setting to deny all, this didn't work. On each created public folder via system manager I have selected properties/permissions and then added the group to Directory rights and set deny all, this also didn't work. I don't want to have to go and setup individual client permissions as this will be very time consuming, so does anyone know how to deny access to Public Folders to a group of users. Thanks Andy Haigh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Thanks for that -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 that's your answer then - see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;273263 -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2002 07:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 No still in Mixed mode -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 December 2002 12:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Are you in Exchange 2000 Native Mode yet? -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2002 00:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Interesting I don't have that function available. These are Public folders I migrated over from a Exchange 5.5 server via a pst file. They show as having email addresses already but if you right click, all tasks you only get Mail Enable it's as if Exchange doesn't know about the email addresses. Yet it works perfectly. I may need to recreated the Folders and copy the contents over to fix up the problem. Though looking at the default Folder Tree, it is set to MAPI Clients so I expect it will always create Mail Enabled folders which cannot be changed. Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Andy, In ESM navigate to the public folder, right click, All Tasks, Mail Disable. Voila, Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 09:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Is there a way to un mail enable a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ
RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN
It's only if you are taking snapshots of running db's that you have the problems. OK I know there are a number of sites out there who will not allow even a minute of the air but the majority of us can live with a script that shuts down the db does the snapshot and then restarts the db all done in less than a minute. You can then kick off your backup which backs the snapshot up to tape. I have seen this form of snapshotting on EMC and NetApps and it works very well. I have also seen Oracle databases recovered from snapshots successfully. Listening to MS they have added support for snapshots in Windows.NET and they are also saying that there will be snapshotting available on the next version of Exchange, but lets wait and see. The snapshots in .NET is more of a complete copy followed by delta's for each subsequent snapshot. EMC and NetApps use technology that provides instant snapshots as all it does it take a snapshot of the block allocation table and only if a block is about to change does it create a second block to keep a copy of the block as at the time of the snapshot. This obviously saves on space but if you have a mutliple disk failure does mean you could lose all of the data for that snapshot, though in one of these modern SAN's with multiple spare drives is very unlikely. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 1:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN If you cant restore it, whats the point? Is it safe to assume the same with a SQL or Oracle db as well? What about a AD global directory? I'm getting the impression that its good for file systems and file servers and not much more. e- -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN You might be able to restore one if you're lucky. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN You can take snapshot backups of the database. You can't restore them, but you can take them. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN I've seen Exchange 2000 run on servers that use a Hitachi SAN. There really shouldn't be any problem running Exchange on any high-quality SAN system. Don't believe the hyperbole, however, that you can take snapshot backups of the Exchange databases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: More OT: Hitachi SAN 2nd verse, same as the first... :p Anyone running a Hitachi 9900 V Series SAN? Or maybe just the 9900 series? Normally I wouldn't ask such things of an exchange group, but the diversity and technical expertise here is very good. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
No still in Mixed mode -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 December 2002 12:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Are you in Exchange 2000 Native Mode yet? -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2002 00:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Interesting I don't have that function available. These are Public folders I migrated over from a Exchange 5.5 server via a pst file. They show as having email addresses already but if you right click, all tasks you only get Mail Enable it's as if Exchange doesn't know about the email addresses. Yet it works perfectly. I may need to recreated the Folders and copy the contents over to fix up the problem. Though looking at the default Folder Tree, it is set to MAPI Clients so I expect it will always create Mail Enabled folders which cannot be changed. Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Andy, In ESM navigate to the public folder, right click, All Tasks, Mail Disable. Voila, Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 09:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Is there a way to un mail enable a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: the IBM Shark
Be wary of the upfront pricing. Currently IBM is offering the kit at very low prices to win back market share from the likes of EMC, HDS and Compaq. You must nail them down to the costs of adding new storage arrays, the cost of additional drives and any tiering of licence prices as your storage grows, also any services you will require afterwards. Again, if you haven't already done so, I would advise to have a look the HDS 9570V or even the EMC CX600. If you are currently looking at the 9900V these units will give them a run for their money and be cheaper. Andy -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2002 1:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: the IBM Shark Other technologies being what?, cause the only other one I have seen in the backstore of a SAN is Fiber Channel Arbitrated Loop, SSA is not arbitrated. TO me this is a pro for multipathing across single ports. Although I have heard that IBM plans to go to FCAL when its throughput gets high enough that the arbitration no longer is a issue. So far it looks like it may be IBM cause of price, they are really coming in strong. And all our figures indicate that the performance between IBM and HDS is a wash. -Original Message- From: Exchange (Swynk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: the IBM Shark But token ring does blow chunks. :) I'm glad to hear you've had a successful implementation; ours was far from successful and has left a bad taste in our collective mouth about this product. I think the problem, more than anything, was that a number of different IBM people from different teams and areas of expertise came out here, and no one was able to provide a solution to our problems. The mantra of it should work, I don't know why it doesn't lost its humor after about the 27th time. Perhaps we just got a bad batch of guys, who knows. Cost aside, the maximum potential throughput of SSA does not come close to that of some other technologies ... And while blow chunks may not have been the best choice of words, I will stand by my lowly opinion of the technology. (Take that with a grain of salt of course, for my opinions rarely hold any value! :) Jon -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 12, 2002 4:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: the IBM Shark Subject: RE: the IBM Shark Hi this is Ben Thompson. I am the Sr. Network Engineer at the college that Liz is the Exchange Administrator. (I just also happen to dual as her husband.) We have had a Shark for several years now. The performance is great. You may want to look at NT related buffering issues when dealing with its performance, we did not have to modify anything to get it working though. We are a Compaq shop and the Compaq SANS just was not up to spec for Novell, NT/2000, and AIX/Linux. (Novell is not even supported with NT on the same unit at the same time.) Exchange has been working wonderfully, as well as Novell, Linux, DOS and 2000. (We are Exchange 5.5) We have been booting from the SANS since day one, something IBM does not like but will support. We also run our production Oracle database on the Shark. If that performance lagged for any reason I would have 3 major sites and 11 remote sites down my throat in a heartbeat. If anyone would care to look at our installation, feel free to e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I can set it up. As to SSA blowing chunks, most people thought the same of Token-Ring. Just because something is more complicated to understand and expensive does not make the architecture blow chunks, just cost prohibitive. Benjamin N. Thompson Senior Network Engineer/Manager CCBC - Catonsville Campus -Original Message- From: Exchange (Swynk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: the IBM Shark It's definitely related to the architecture -- SSA blows chunks. We've had several IBM guys out here to apply their expertise (read: blindly poke around) . plus, paying $30k x 2 for just a couple hundred gb is highway robbery! Can you tell I hate IBM? :) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:58 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: the IBM Shark Subject: RE: the IBM Shark While I know the Compaq stuff is some of the best out there, I'd be very interested to see if the performance issues you're seeing aren't more directly related to poor drive/array/LUN partitioning rather than issues with specific architecture - after all, once it leaves the HBA, FC is FC. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems
RE: Must be Fri 13th
As the error is being reported on the W2K Server and the error is and Exchange error I would say the SP should be added to the Server. Though as it is a fix in a SP rather than a hotfix why just apply the SP to both the server and the workstation. Also it wouldn't hurt to install Exchange SP3 either. Andy -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Must be Fri 13th To all: Is it me? Or is it my stupid head cold? I, for the life of me, by reading this KDB article, can not determine whether my server machine or client machine needs to be upgraded. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305596 The situation: Workstation: Windows 2000 SP1 running Outlook 2000 SR1 outside the network. Server: Windows 2000 Server SP2, Exchange 2000 SP2 I try to hook up to the server from outside the network (all traffic from specific IP is passed through the FW). I can connect but I get the following when Outlook runs: Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The information store could not be opened. I checked the above article and am not sure which to upgrade (DON'T want to upgrade the server as of yet). If you feel up to it, I appreciate your comments. Aloha, Don Couch Systems Administrator 808-891-7915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pacific Disaster Center/East West Center 590 Lipoa Parkway Suite 259 Kihei, HI. 96753 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
Nfuse as in Citrix -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk NFuse as in nfuse,com? Never heard of them, so I just spent five minutes on their web site and based on what I read there I have no idea of what they do. Nice new-age menu system, though. Jon -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Securing the OWA Kiosk What about pushing Outlook through NFuse ? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:07 PM Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk We use a VPN/terminal services combo, works good. -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk I do not believe that many of our users would opt for OWA via VPN if they have Outlook available on the VPNd client, although I would not care either way. The key thing in that scenario is that the VPN is doing its security thing. Jon -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk I don't support OWA via VPN - if you're VPN'ed in, use Outlook. In fact, I've IP-limited OWA to external users only. We provide Outlook for a reason - we expect it to be used. As I said before, we do secure OWA with a multi-factor one time use authentication system (RSA's SecurID) which works well. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Mark, Thanks - interesting audit. If we decide to go forward with allowing non-VPN clients access to Outlook we will take a closer look at the product. Is anyone aware of similar products? A question for the group on a related topic: is it common practice to allow non-VPN clients to access Outlook via OWA, or do most companies require at least a VPN connection? Jon -Original Message- From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Jon, You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who has unauthorized access to email can potentially: - Get people fired; - Get people arrested; - Get companies/people sued; - Cost companies/people money. Thanks . . . Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
OT: List for Thin Client
I was wondering is anyone new of a good Windows 2000 Terminal Server discussion list Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Is there a way to un mail enable a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Interesting I don't have that function available. These are Public folders I migrated over from a Exchange 5.5 server via a pst file. They show as having email addresses already but if you right click, all tasks you only get Mail Enable it's as if Exchange doesn't know about the email addresses. Yet it works perfectly. I may need to recreated the Folders and copy the contents over to fix up the problem. Though looking at the default Folder Tree, it is set to MAPI Clients so I expect it will always create Mail Enabled folders which cannot be changed. Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Andy, In ESM navigate to the public folder, right click, All Tasks, Mail Disable. Voila, Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 09:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Is there a way to un mail enable a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: the IBM Shark
We also have sharks down here in Aus. But seriously have a look at the new HDS 9570V it will probably do what you want at a lower price than the 9900V. Not heard many good things about IBM sharks. Andy -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 10 December 2002 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: the IBM Shark We have sharks here to - see http://www.blueplanetaquarium.com/blue/blue_sharks.html for details Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Exchange (Swynk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 December 2002 18:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: the IBM Shark We have a Shark here and found that it is CRAP when it comes to I/O intensive Win32 applications. Someone here got the bright idea to have an enterprise-wide SAN solution, instead of looking at it from the perspective of how each platform actually works the Shark works great for legacy (i.e. IBM) systems, and works marginally well for NT file servers, but try sticking a large SQL database on there and watch what happens. Of all the SANs out there (at least 18 months ago when ours was purchased), the Shark was one of the most expensive, and one of the slowest. It may not be the same with newer Sharks, but ours is a slow-as-hell drive technology that choked whenever we tested SQL databases and Exchange 5.5 on it. We have found that Compaq's SAN solution works well for our environment -- it's almost half the price of comparable storage on the Shark, and much much faster. Since we're an all-Compaq shop for our Win32 systems, that's what we're moving to now. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:29 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: the IBM Shark Subject: OT: the IBM Shark Is anyone here happen to be running a IBM shark or possibly a Hitachi 9900 series SAN? We are looking at both of these and I have heard rumors that the shark has a performance boundary of 3.36 TB. Just curious. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using a mail group as the destination address for NDR's
We have just recently migrated to Exchange 2000 and are experiencing a few problems when trying to send the NDR's to a team of people via a mail group. Can anyone tell me whether they have successfully implemented this approach or whether there are any known problems. We are currently on SP3. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Permissions within Exchange 2000
Having recently converted to Exchange 2000 I may ask some obvious questions so I apologise in advance. Currently have been setting up my Public Folders and need to change the permissions on a top level folder and then propogate the changes down to all other folders. Here is my problem the propogate permissions option doesn't seem to exist. I'm sure they wouldn't have removed such funtionality and it's my lack of knowledge of the product that means I don't know where to find the option. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Permissions within Exchange 2000
Please ignore I have now found it. Never thought to look in new under right click and then calling folder rights threw me a bit as well. A bit of experimentation and there was the answer. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Permissions within Exchange 2000 Having recently converted to Exchange 2000 I may ask some obvious questions so I apologise in advance. Currently have been setting up my Public Folders and need to change the permissions on a top level folder and then propogate the changes down to all other folders. Here is my problem the propogate permissions option doesn't seem to exist. I'm sure they wouldn't have removed such funtionality and it's my lack of knowledge of the product that means I don't know where to find the option. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting Calender Entries to Busy
We have set up a calender in our Public Folders and would like it to default to showing appointments as busy, at present it defaults to free. I have looked at all options but can't see how to set this. Thanks in advance. Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA on Exchange 2000
We are looking at upgrading to E2K and currently have OWA setup on a web server seperate to our Exchange Server 5.5 machine. One of my technical guys after researching this has said that this configuration is not possible in a E2K enviroment. Is this true. Surely you can have a scenario where web part is in the DMZ and the actual exchange server is on the inside network, although I do realise that OWA is more integrated in E2K but I would have thought the web part would be transportable. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
