RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Do you only have one Exchange Server? Are you in 5.5 or E2k? We have seen this when I User requests information from one of our other Servers (or the bandwidth is saturated). Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Set it to run in the middle of the night -- say 1:00 a.m. Block out the 1:00 a.m. for all days. That doesn't mean it will stop when 2:00 a.m. comes. It will complete the cycle. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dear Andy, Thank you. How much consecutive time should I give for this process? What are your settings (out of curiosity)? At the present (some of it will change), I have all 7 days looking the same, and each day has four hours total, given to this process. There are two two-hour blocks. The first taking place from 12:01 AM till 1:59 AM. The second taking place from 11:01 AM till 12:59 PM. If I only allocate one hour, and the process starts but does not finish, will it actually stop until the next selected block of time? I am led to think so. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
A little too much information there. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
We just went through the same thing pertaining strictly to emails. No personal emails that you wouldn't want the Company to see and access at all times to anyone's mailbox. In this day and age, too many lawsuits are swayed by emails that documented an employee or employer's actions. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Alexander Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file. In this day and age, with human rights litigation running rampant, a company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues. Alex - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
I disagree with you. As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your job to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a problem, or if asked to by their manager/supervisor. As any Mail Administrator should tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply because I am an Exchange Administrator? I don't think so. The company has that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility to you, I would be carefull. However, if it is something you would see in the course of doing your daily job, then that is different. Dennis -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title. As far as accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems them might be having? We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems, inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their credentials 3 or 4 times a day. We then ask them to change their password. But all Mail Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and their passwords, you can get into anybody's mailbox. But does that mean you should? No. I have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what the contents were. But I have worked with some people who have done it. There's where the trust has to come into play. I even showed management that they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes. They then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were eventually let go. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter there is implicit trust That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not touching it. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: Blocking a newsletter
That's what I said in the beginning. You may the rights to do it, but that doesn't mean you should. I don't go anywhere that a manager or supervisor tells me to. We get User requests all the time asking for access to a User's mailbox that has left the Company. We bounce it back to them and tell them they need managerial approval. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Um, no. Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email. I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts. The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given. Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be fired. If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied. there is a difference. www.dictionary.com? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Funny. My dictionary doesn't have the word Exchange Administrator in it. Oh well, guess everything I said before you can forget. LOL Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter I think you need to check the Dictionary.com site again. As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That implies not only the ability, but the sanction. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter That's what I said in the beginning. You may the rights to do it, but that doesn't mean you should. I don't go anywhere that a manager or supervisor tells me to. We get User requests all the time asking for access to a User's mailbox that has left the Company. We bounce it back to them and tell them they need managerial approval. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Um, no. Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email. I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts. The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given. Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be fired. If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied. there is a difference. www.dictionary.com? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID: 1174
Did you check 279509. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID: 1174 Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0. Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to end. I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message. Event ID: 1174 Source: MSExchangeDS Type: Information Category: Security Description: An unauthenticated logon was attempted. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold
IIRC, I thought it was somewhere around 60,000. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold I would like to know what is the maximum mailboxes that Exchange 5.5. Enterprise can hold. I heard it was 50, 000, but i am not sure _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold
Now that I did a little digging, I believe you are only limited by disk space availabilty. So the sky's the limit. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold Wow 50K plus on one server. I know there out there. But why would you want to put that much on one box. Not to mention the size of the IS DB size. - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:42 PM Subject: RE: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold IIRC, I thought it was somewhere around 60,000. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold I would like to know what is the maximum mailboxes that Exchange 5.5. Enterprise can hold. I heard it was 50, 000, but i am not sure _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client
I know with Verizon, it did not like PPPoe over TCP/IP. At least on a Win2k Professional machine. But once XP Professional was installed, it was as happy as a pig in s#%$. Gèeoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client If it's doing NAT I don't think it'll work. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 PM Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client Hi all. Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL service? I just got it installed and it is working great. However when I am on DSL, I can't connect to my corporate network with the MS VPN client. My setup at home is: Win ME or Win 2K Pro with MS VPN client BellSouth gave me Westell WireSpeed DSL modem I bought D-Link 614+ Wireless router. However my PC is wired. D-Link is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I have even tried to bypass D-Link and connected straight to the Westell modem. Still no luck. The Westell modem is actually a router with a firewall but as far as I can see it is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I can ping the external IP address of the VPN server. MS VPN client can see it too but it times out on Verifying username and password and gives error 650. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client
Yeah, but XPPro has that nifty little feature called restore/rollback, where is you screw your machine up with a piece of software, you could ro it back to a specific time, and your machine would be back to normal. (H, normal, there's that word again. Is there normalcy on a PC?) Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client Hehe, my OS of choice at home is WinME :) Not that I relly like it. But that's what came with my Dell PC when I bought it and I did not feel like replacing it. Plus it has some nifty Dell utilities that allow me to quickly restore the configuration in case I screw it up by installing something dangerous. Plus ME allows me to play Su-27 Flanker better than 2000 or XP. And AirWarrior3 too. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client I know with Verizon, it did not like PPPoe over TCP/IP. At least on a Win2k Professional machine. But once XP Professional was installed, it was as happy as a pig in s#%$. Gèeoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client If it's doing NAT I don't think it'll work. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 PM Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client Hi all. Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL service? I just got it installed and it is working great. However when I am on DSL, I can't connect to my corporate network with the MS VPN client. My setup at home is: Win ME or Win 2K Pro with MS VPN client BellSouth gave me Westell WireSpeed DSL modem I bought D-Link 614+ Wireless router. However my PC is wired. D-Link is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I have even tried to bypass D-Link and connected straight to the Westell modem. Still no luck. The Westell modem is actually a router with a firewall but as far as I can see it is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I can ping the external IP address of the VPN server. MS VPN client can see it too but it times out on Verifying username and password and gives error 650. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
Well, in my test, it looks like its somewhere up where the space station is! Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't delete email
Does it show up in OWA? And did you try deleting it through OWA? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't delete email I have an email which one of my users received from Omaha Steaks which cannot be deleted.Get an unknown error when trying to delete. I cannot find the message on my Server, message tracking is turned on. Exchange 2000 sp3. Any ideas? TIA Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail
Jim: Check your attitude at the door or get it adjusted! LOL Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail Well... The only thing worthwhile that I have to add is Learn to Spell. Yah...you're a die-hard fan, aren't ya? Having been a die-hard fan of the team myself, since 1976 and the Jack Lambert days, I can tell you that their name is spelled STEELERS, not STILLERS. Hey...it's Thanksgiving week...I'm bored, getting divorced and don't have anyone else to pick on! ;o) -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail Hi All, I'm being unsubscribed from a mailing list because of reported Probe Failure errors, and I'm having difficulty getting off square one with this issue. The mailing list is an L-Soft software, Le mot du Jour. The administrative messages come through fine, but regular mailings do not, and after about a week, I get an unsubscribe note telling me that they had 5 errors delivering mail and the error was Probe Failure. I am subscribed to a WIN-NT list that also complains from time to time about a Probe Failure, but I can usually just send it a confirm command back, and it resumes. I only seem to have this problem with the L-Soft type of mailing list. Other mailing lists and of course the Spammers and able to reach me 24x7. I have turned up the IMC logging, but I'm not seeing any errors. I do have some IP's blocked at the firewall as an anti-spam measure, but none of the addresses blocked are anywhere near IP of the administrative messages. Why would the return address of the mailing list email be different from the list's administrative e-mail anyway? I feel I must be missing something fundamental. Any clues appreciated. Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail
Perhaps they are thinking of recipient's digital ID to their contact list. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail Perhaps Kim has noticed the Outlook Express setting Tools Options Send - Automatically put people I reply to in my Address Book [1]. I don't believe there is a corresponding Outlook setting. Jim Helfer [1] I'm no grammarist,[2] but I think there's something incorrect about that sentence [2] Actually, I'm not even sure if this is a real word. ::-Original Message- ::From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ::Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:40 PM ::To: Exchange Discussions ::Subject: RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail :: :: ::Reference? :: :: -Original Message- :: From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] :: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:49 AM :: To: Exchange Discussions :: :: :: Hi there, :: :: According to technet it should be opossible to autmatically :: save the contact details of a recipient you reply to in the :: address book, I have XP, SP2 and can't find a bloody way to :: do this :: ::_ ::List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm ::Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp ::To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients
Sure. File/Import/Export/Export to DOS, etc., etc., Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients Is there anyway to change all contacts' internet format from rtf to plain text without having to change the properties of each individual one. I have a user who has 100's of contacts and wants to change them all to plain text. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Penguin
Sybari (Antigen) has this up on their archives. It dates back to 11/00. If you are blocking .exe files, you should be fine. If you want to take a look at it, here is the link: http://www.sybari.com/alerts/ Then do a search for The Penguin Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Penguin Weird. User had notepad popup and display this message. Hi, guess you have got the message. I have kept a list of files that I have infected under this. If you are smart enough just reverse back the process. i could have done far better damage, i could have even completely wiped your harddisk. Remember this is a warning get it sound and clear... - The Penguin Nothing I could find on Trend or Norton web sites about it. Any ideas? TIA Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Schema Update Questions
Maybe the Advanced Features on the View pulldown menu? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed. What I am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select Exchange Tasks. I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no errors, nothing. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools are installed. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our environment in the next week. It will coexist with our Exchange 5.5 server for a few months. I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD. We've run /forestprep and /domainprep and have created a two-way connection agreement, but I have not seen anything relating to Exchange reflected in the user's profiles, not even the Exchange features tab. Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its a permission issue with the account used for the updates? If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running /forestprep and /domainprep again? Dot Harris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC Delete
Environment: 1-E2k/SP3 on Win2k/SP3; 9-Exch. 5.5/SP4 on Win2k/SP3 Servers spread out around the USA. I just decommissioned a 5.5 Server, replicated it out of the 5.5 and E2k environment. I deleted the CAs in the ADC, but I cannot delete the ADC itself? It have also deleted the Exchange 5.5 server and its settings out of Sites and services. I have search the KB, Tech-Net and archives, but only find articles regarding deleting the CAs. I know this must be something simple that I am just overlooking. Must be having a brainfa#t this morning. Maybe need more coffee. Thanks for you help. Gèoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Delete
I have deleted all the Exchange Settings in site and services for this site. The only server that shows up under sites and services is the DC for that site. And there are no settings for that. The ADC for the site still shows up under the ADC Services, but it has no CAs. I need to delete the empty ADC. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active directory sites and services. Server, services, ADC server name, delete key. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Delete Environment: 1-E2k/SP3 on Win2k/SP3; 9-Exch. 5.5/SP4 on Win2k/SP3 Servers spread out around the USA. I just decommissioned a 5.5 Server, replicated it out of the 5.5 and E2k environment. I deleted the CAs in the ADC, but I cannot delete the ADC itself? It have also deleted the Exchange 5.5 server and its settings out of Sites and services. I have search the KB, Tech-Net and archives, but only find articles regarding deleting the CAs. I know this must be something simple that I am just overlooking. Must be having a brainfa#t this morning. Maybe need more coffee. Thanks for you help. Gèoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Delete
I did remove the 5.5 Server through the 5.5 Administrator. (It is not our last 5.5 server -- there are still eight (8) 5.5 Servers in this environment.) I removed the CAs from the ADC and the went to site and services and deleted the ADC under Exchange Settings. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete Your mistake was deleting the last Exchange 5.5 server using Sites and Services. You should have used the old Exchange 5.5 Administrator. (This process isn't exactly intuitive, I'll admit.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I have deleted all the Exchange Settings in site and services for this site. The only server that shows up under sites and services is the DC for that site. And there are no settings for that. The ADC for the site still shows up under the ADC Services, but it has no CAs. I need to delete the empty ADC. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active directory sites and services. Server, services, ADC server name, delete key. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Delete Environment: 1-E2k/SP3 on Win2k/SP3; 9-Exch. 5.5/SP4 on Win2k/SP3 Servers spread out around the USA. I just decommissioned a 5.5 Server, replicated it out of the 5.5 and E2k environment. I deleted the CAs in the ADC, but I cannot delete the ADC itself? It have also deleted the Exchange 5.5 server and its settings out of Sites and services. I have search the KB, Tech-Net and archives, but only find articles regarding deleting the CAs. I know this must be something simple that I am just overlooking. Must be having a brainfa#t this morning. Maybe need more coffee. Thanks for you help. Gèoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Delete
I deleted the ADC for the decommissioned Server in Sites and Services, which should have removed it from the ADC Services. So what remains is a shell for the ADC in ADC Services (not to be confused with ADC Sites and Services). Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete The last in the site is what matters. And I sure looks like in your first post you said you deleted it using AD Sites and Services, but the grammar is unclear so you must have meant something else. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I did remove the 5.5 Server through the 5.5 Administrator. (It is not our last 5.5 server -- there are still eight (8) 5.5 Servers in this environment.) I removed the CAs from the ADC and the went to site and services and deleted the ADC under Exchange Settings. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete Your mistake was deleting the last Exchange 5.5 server using Sites and Services. You should have used the old Exchange 5.5 Administrator. (This process isn't exactly intuitive, I'll admit.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I have deleted all the Exchange Settings in site and services for this site. The only server that shows up under sites and services is the DC for that site. And there are no settings for that. The ADC for the site still shows up under the ADC Services, but it has no CAs. I need to delete the empty ADC. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active directory sites and services. Server, services, ADC server name, delete key. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Delete Environment: 1-E2k/SP3 on Win2k/SP3; 9-Exch. 5.5/SP4 on Win2k/SP3 Servers spread out around the USA. I just decommissioned a 5.5 Server, replicated it out of the 5.5 and E2k environment. I deleted the CAs in the ADC, but I cannot delete the ADC itself? It have also deleted the Exchange 5.5 server and its settings out of Sites and services. I have search the KB, Tech-Net and archives, but only find articles regarding deleting the CAs. I know this must be something simple that I am just overlooking. Must be having a brainfa#t this morning. Maybe need more coffee. Thanks for you help. Gèoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: ADC Delete
No. I still have 8 other ADC running and one empty ADC with no CAs that I am now trying to remove from the ADC Services. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete Did you remove the ADC software? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I deleted the ADC for the decommissioned Server in Sites and Services, which should have removed it from the ADC Services. So what remains is a shell for the ADC in ADC Services (not to be confused with ADC Sites and Services). Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete The last in the site is what matters. And I sure looks like in your first post you said you deleted it using AD Sites and Services, but the grammar is unclear so you must have meant something else. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I did remove the 5.5 Server through the 5.5 Administrator. (It is not our last 5.5 server -- there are still eight (8) 5.5 Servers in this environment.) I removed the CAs from the ADC and the went to site and services and deleted the ADC under Exchange Settings. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete Your mistake was deleting the last Exchange 5.5 server using Sites and Services. You should have used the old Exchange 5.5 Administrator. (This process isn't exactly intuitive, I'll admit.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I have deleted all the Exchange Settings in site and services for this site. The only server that shows up under sites and services is the DC for that site. And there are no settings for that. The ADC for the site still shows up under the ADC Services, but it has no CAs. I need to delete the empty ADC. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active directory sites and services. Server, services, ADC server name, delete key. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Delete Environment: 1-E2k/SP3 on Win2k/SP3; 9-Exch. 5.5/SP4 on Win2k/SP3 Servers spread out around the USA. I just decommissioned a 5.5 Server, replicated it out of the 5.5 and E2k environment. I deleted the CAs in the ADC, but I cannot delete the ADC itself? It have also deleted the Exchange 5.5 server and its settings out of Sites and services. I have search the KB, Tech-Net and archives, but only find articles regarding deleting the CAs. I know this must be something simple that I am just overlooking. Must be having a brainfa#t this morning. Maybe need more coffee. Thanks for you help. Gèoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: ADC Delete
Ed: I did not understand what you were saying when I first read your post. However, I did finally realize what you were trying to say. I appreciate your help. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete Did you remove the ADC software? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I deleted the ADC for the decommissioned Server in Sites and Services, which should have removed it from the ADC Services. So what remains is a shell for the ADC in ADC Services (not to be confused with ADC Sites and Services). Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete The last in the site is what matters. And I sure looks like in your first post you said you deleted it using AD Sites and Services, but the grammar is unclear so you must have meant something else. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I did remove the 5.5 Server through the 5.5 Administrator. (It is not our last 5.5 server -- there are still eight (8) 5.5 Servers in this environment.) I removed the CAs from the ADC and the went to site and services and deleted the ADC under Exchange Settings. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete Your mistake was deleting the last Exchange 5.5 server using Sites and Services. You should have used the old Exchange 5.5 Administrator. (This process isn't exactly intuitive, I'll admit.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete I have deleted all the Exchange Settings in site and services for this site. The only server that shows up under sites and services is the DC for that site. And there are no settings for that. The ADC for the site still shows up under the ADC Services, but it has no CAs. I need to delete the empty ADC. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Delete IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active directory sites and services. Server, services, ADC server name, delete key. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Delete Environment: 1-E2k/SP3 on Win2k/SP3; 9-Exch. 5.5/SP4 on Win2k/SP3 Servers spread out around the USA. I just decommissioned a 5.5 Server, replicated it out of the 5.5 and E2k environment. I deleted the CAs in the ADC, but I cannot delete the ADC itself? It have also deleted the Exchange 5.5 server and its settings out of Sites and services. I have search the KB, Tech-Net and archives, but only find articles regarding deleting the CAs. I know this must be something simple that I am just overlooking. Must be having a brainfa#t this morning. Maybe need more coffee. Thanks for you help. Gèoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
RE: ESE97
IIRC, you will need 110% of free disk space of the size of your priv.edb, e.g., Priv=50GB, you would need 55GB. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ESE97 We are running Exchange5.5 with Arcserve2000. Have one try this before. I want to install a new 9.1GB drive and then restore the priv.edb on to the new drive. I would run eseutil.exe and Isinteg.exe for the priv.edb on the new drive. Have anyone try this? Thank -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ESE97 When was your last good backup. Hopefully you do not use circular logging. I take it you are getting database errors and mail is flowing, if I remember correctly. My guess is you had some hardware problem to cause the errors. I would take a good backup and restore it to a machine to see if isinteg finds any errors. If so repair them and then restore that clean database and let the log files backfill to make the repaired database current. I would also look at all logs to see if you are having any hardware problems as it seem this may be the case. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: RE: ESE97 Call PSS now. Don't shutdown the server. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ESE97 Has anyone encounter this error before and what are the step I need to take to fix this. I have read Q314917 and there a lots of information about -1018. Are they the same. Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Tony N. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Phenomena
You don't have Authentication set to None on these machines, perhaps? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Strange Phenomena Thanks to all your help, I successfully rebuilt an Exchange 2000 machine from scratch and migrated all my users from one an exchange box on one domain to the new one in the new domain. I am having one strange issue though. When a few users open their Outlook 2002 client, they are prompted for their password. They are all on the same domain so they shouldn't be prompted at all. Each clinet appears to be configured alike. The only way I was able to resolve this was to delete their accounts (email and Windows) recreate everything and migrate their mail back. Does anyone know what is going on? As usual, thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus software for exchange.
Antigen 7.0 for Exchange by Sybari -- period. Goff... -Original Message- From: Mustafa E. Senyuz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus software for exchange. Hi people, Which Antivirus for exchange programs would you advice? I tried Norton AV for exchange but i think it is not a good product at all. Mustafa E. Senyuz System Engineer Turk Nokta Net Sabanc Center 4.Levent 80745, stanbul - Turkey Phone : + 90 (212) 281 01 00 (ext:260) Fax : + 90 (212) 284 23 66 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
I thought it stood for Probably Simply Solution. Just my .02. And I don't give change. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation Patently Stupid Simpletons? - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Who is PSS again? -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:cvaglica;bckpc.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Call PSS -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018 Any info is helpful Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus software for exchange.
Quarantine the messages, Johnny, and then go in and read to your heart's content. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:jmartinez;tmi-la.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus software for exchange. I have used Norton AV for Exchange and liked it alot. What don't you like? It's easily configurable via a webbased UI and you can set it to update very often. The company I am at now is using Antigen which uses like six different AV scanners in one suite. The configuration interface isn't as simple as Norton AV for Exchange but it's no big deal once you get a little face time with it. I would recommend Antigen because of the multi AV scanners though. One thing I don't like is that it isn't able to report the intended recipients of viruses because it scans/cleans before it gets that far. This is good though but I would like the extra info on who the intended recipient was. Johnny -Original Message- From: Mustafa E. Senyuz [mailto:msenyuz;turk.net] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus software for exchange. Hi people, Which Antivirus for exchange programs would you advice? I tried Norton AV for exchange but i think it is not a good product at all. Mustafa E. Senyuz System Engineer Turk Nokta Net Sabanci Center 4.Levent 80745, Istanbul - Turkey Phone : + 90 (212) 281 01 00 (ext:260) Fax : + 90 (212) 284 23 66 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disappearing DL changes (5.5)...
Is she downloading the address list before she takes the laptop off the Network. Because if she isn't, when she came back in the next day and synched with the Server it would undo what she did, as her laptop would be different than what was up on the Server. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disappearing DL changes (5.5)... 5.5 sp4 and ex2ksp3 (mixed). User is on 5.5, uses a laptop with Office 2k. User does use laptop offline. (i.e. dial in from home and synch) While at work, on corporate LAN, user modifies membership of DL (of which user is the owner) in GAL. Changes appear in GAL. User goes home at night, logs in, comes to work next day, changes are gone/undone. But note also: User makes changes at work, doesn't log on from home that night, next day, changes still there. That night, takes laptop home, logs in, next day, changes are still there from before. So.. if she logs on from home the same day she makes changes, the changes dissapear. If she waits a day, the changes work. Any ideas. Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: forwarding and copying messages in exchange 2000
How about opening the ESM|Double click on Recipients|right-click on Recipient Policies|Create New Recipient Policy|tick off the E-mail address. Voila! Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern;baldhead.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: forwarding and copying messages in exchange 2000 I want to forward a copy of all messages to a mailbox to an outside email. I know this was possible in 5.5 but have 2000. In 5.5 you could set up a custom recipient and in 5.5 administrator and get it going that way. I can't find any such functionality in 2000! I know it must be there, what good would a mailserver be if you couldn't forward email to another external address at the server level? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot create a mailbox on E2K as Administrator
Unlike 5.5, E2k has to have certain permissions/rights on the AD account you are using to do things. Check the permissions/rights. I know it is in the KB of MS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cannot create a mailbox on E2K as Administrator Any ideas why? I have checked permissions in ADUC, checked permissions in ESM, checked permissions on the E2K server. Other admins can create mailboxes there, just not the domain administrator account.. Poooh! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT 4 resolution
And this relates to this discussion group and Exchange how? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:David.Lloyd;which.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT 4 resolution Hi Guys Was wondering if anyone is aware of a way of finding out all our hosts MAC addresses from NT4 server. I can get a list of host names to IP addresses from WINS/DHCP etc, Anyone know of a way? Thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
There are two (2) actually. Friend-Greeting.com and Friend-Greetings.com. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails to clients that are restricted
I really should have let someone else do this. Jeesh.. OS/SP/EX yada, yada, yada. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails to clients that are restricted We have a couple of system accounts that we send email to that no one has access to send back to via delivery restricts. Well someone actually sent back and it go through. Any idea's why? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Non-existent E2K size limits?
Did you check out Q326998? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Julian Nimmo [mailto:discussion-exchange;bbs.eu.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Non-existent E2K size limits? The message is sent from any Outlook 2000 client directly to the Exchange 2000 server, which then sends the NDR below to the sender. It doesn't get any further than a single step in the path! It allows large messages in, no problem. The NDR is definitely coming from the postmaster on the E2k server, and it has the server FQDN in the error at the bottom: mailserver.ourdomain.com #5.2.3 Any further ideas? Gary What is the exact path that message took? - Original Message - From: Gary Duckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:05 AM Subject: Non-existent E2K size limits? Hi Guys, I have an E2K single server that is not allowing messages over 6Mb to be sent out. I have checked the outbound limits in the SMTP protocol, the default limits on the main settings and the user's AD settings. I have searched Microsoft support for all 5.2.3 errors as well, and looked at all settings suggested there, but with no joy. The server can receive large emails, no problem. It is not the ISP. The message gets returned with the following error: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: large email test Sent: 21/10/02 09:02 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 21/10/02 09:02 The message was not delivered because it is larger than the current system limit. Create a shorter message body or remove attachments and try sending it again. I am obviously missing something obvious - anybody know of any other restriction or setting that might cause this error? Thanks, Gary Duckman BBS Gary Duckman Networking Manager Tel: +44 (0) 20 8663 0077 Fax: +44 (0) 870 1389349 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This Email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for the intended recipient only. Access to, disclosure of, copying, distribution of, or reliance on any part of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal offence. Please delete if obtained in error and Email confirmation to the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Beckenham Business Systems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution List
Perhaps the names are being hidden from the DL, so all they are supposed to see is the DL name. Check and see if that option is ticked. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:Thomas.Smith;pittsburgh.af.mil] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Distribution List I have some users who can't see inside a distrbution list. When they are in outlook and go to the distrbution list, they can se the list ,but not the people in them. any ideas thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing an internet mail connector
The IMC is installed with the Exchange Server, when you first install the Server. You then create the IMC once Exchange is installed (File/New Other/. . . . Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing an internet mail connector This is new to me so I was hoping for a few suggestions and some help. I have Exchange 5.5 in my organization. I currently have an internet mail connector. However the server is having problems and I am building a new one. My question is. How do I install the internet mail connector? I do not see it as part of the installation options. By having two internet mail connectors in the same site... will it cause any problems or can they co-exist until I can remove the original one? Any information would help. Thanks all. Ed *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
I'll second that topic. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Lets talk about something else like making it illegal to smoke in restaurants or bars -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Caution: Thread is hot. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's At no time have I said that companies can't choose to implement RBLs; simply that they should be cognizant of the complete ramifications of the technology. Obtaining this level of understanding is a much better example of risk management than some theoretical defense against a risk which appears to have no foundation in reality. Please don't use the McDonalds lawsuit as some type of example of the legal system gone bezerk. If you actually understood the history of the case, you'd find that the judgment itself was well within the bounds of reason, even if the monetary damages awarded appear to be a bit shocking. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:brett.finch;hrs.ualberta.ca] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Can you say 'risk management'. If someone can drive up to a window, order a coffee then take the lid off, drive over a speed bump and sue someone else, anything is possible :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 21:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's I've never heard of a single instance where a lawsuit was initiated against an organization based on incoming *spam*. Can you point to one? I can point to deals which didn't get done because of RBLs which resulted in real monetary loss, which would seem to make one more likely than the other unless you can point to a court case I'm not aware of. Matt's client side could technically be much different from a normal organization since his firm provides hosting to businesses (clients) who have their own users (another type of client). There are plenty of examples of server based filtering based on individual user settings which could potentially meet his objective and address your objection. Most of those solutions are poorly done IMNSHO. RBLs in general aren't content filtering solutions, they are connection filtering solutions. While they may at some level achieve similar results, their objectives are actually quite different. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:brett.finch;hrs.ualberta.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I've watched this thread for a while. I don't buy the argument that a ten million deal will fail because of a bounced email via RBL. It's just as likely that a dept. with predominant females could sue for fifteen million for sexual harassment in the fact the company with the ten million dollar deal didn't take reasonable steps to protect them from this spam. There also seems to be no argument about the value of email in the workplace and that a business may find they loose a ten thousand dollar deal but save fifteen thousand in the fact their people are actually doing what they were hired to do (as mentioned in other posts bandwidth costs, storage costs as well). As for the per client configuration, that works until they start adding their contacts to the junk list or they log into a Terminal Server or via wireless with a PDA. We also don't hire people based on their skills to manage their email. Finding a moderate RBL with reasonable rules and sending a nice e-mail back to a would be spammer seems to work as well as anything. -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Very true..We have hosted exchange for business and we get the sh-t spammed out of us. But we do not block any email! That may change as our customers are complaining bitterly. The best solution we would like is a filter on the client side and not the server side. MacAfee spam kill product looks nice but I do not know if it can talk to Exchange server. (not POP) I just felt we started something ugly on this list!!:) Wanted to clarify why we were interested. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's And in general, the business needs of a firm providing free web based e-mail, vs. the business needs of a Fortune 500
RE: Suppressing the envelope
Sure, Darcy. I am on 2002 but I believe it is the same in 2000. Tools/Options/E-Mail Options/Advanced E-Mail Option. Un-tick the Show envelope in System tray. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suppressing the envelope I've looked for this off and on an never had any luck finding it. Now we have an application server that is being shared, and folks are complaining that the envelop icon is appearing multiple times when they use Outlook via this server. Here's the question: Is there some way to suppress the envelope icon that shows up in the task bar when new mail comes in? Many thanks! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suppressing the envelope
Earlier versions you can only Briefly change the mouse cursor. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suppressing the envelope You can do this with OL2002 (XP). I don't think you can with any prior versions. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suppressing the envelope I've looked for this off and on an never had any luck finding it. Now we have an application server that is being shared, and folks are complaining that the envelop icon is appearing multiple times when they use Outlook via this server. Here's the question: Is there some way to suppress the envelope icon that shows up in the task bar when new mail comes in? Many thanks! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Import Address list
In Outlook, do a File/Import/choose from another program, etc., etc., etc., just as you would have done the export. Also the FAQs are very good for this. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Import Address list Once I Export from Outlook how do I import into Exchange 2000? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails
And Antigen will be coming out 1st Qtr. 2003 with anti-spam and message and attachment scanning. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:grant;fsna.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails I'm running Sybari's Antigen. As well as being an antivirus product you can filter out subject line words and sender domains. Steve -Original Message- From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [mailto:Clint.Kleciak;CIGNA.COM] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails Any such functionality or third product tool? thanks Clint -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This e-mail transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: field is empty
If I understand you correctly, which I believe I am a little confused, if you put all the names in the BCC field, no other person will know that someone got the same message. Is this what you are loosing for? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:exchangelist;ubl.com.pk] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: To: field is empty Is their a way that we block emails that does not contain any to header in To: and yet still managed to deliver to our users ? Thanks Regards. Irfan Malik. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Guess it is now! Check attitude at the door. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard;VISIONICS.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution How come no one has bothered to post a response to my question? Is that too stupid or trivial a question/topic to warrant a response?!! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard;VISIONICS.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Interesting EX2K migration solution Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations NT domains, as well as 2 separate locations. To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate to EX2K/W2K/AD in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other location there. The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however these users will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access EX2K, across a Frame Relay (1024kbps). I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for this work, but obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain. So I'm just wondering, will this work?! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook2000
Sounds like a bandwidth issue trying to access another Exchange Server for the information. Is the data housed on another Exchange Server or just your Exchange Server? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook2000 Sounds like a bandwidth issue more then an outlook/exchange issue then. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook2000 One user in my office keeps getting this window saying Outlook is requesting data from the exchange server when he makes changes to contacts. No one else in the office has made this 'complaint' and it appears to not be random. I tried closing Outlook and rebooting, but it's still doing it, and it's taking minutes to complete the request. Anyone have any suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA won't let Log on
We had this problem sometime last year. We figured out that if the User's password had expired or if you had the User must change password . . . . checked in NT, that is would do exactly what you say. We then did some adjustments on our IIS, to set it so you didn't have to type domain\username. Don't remember the whole scenario. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:JMorgan;SCSDB.k12.sc.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA won't let Log on I have just installed OWA and when I type in my alias it prompts me for my user name When I enter it Domain\Username and Password It asks me for my credentials again like I have typed the wrong info... After it times out from lack of authentication it just takes me to a blank screen I have installed OWA at least 2 dozen times and I have never experienced this does anyone have any ideas? Environment Exchange 5.5 SP4 OWA on Exchange Server Windows 2000 SP3 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind Phone: (864) 577-7548 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery failure to exlist@forcefields.com
Nope. No open relay here. Nothing has changed since yesterday when I posted a reply to the Board. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forcefields.com is rejecting because there rbl software is telling them too. Maybe your an open relay. - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:14 AM Subject: FW: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone ever seen this error message before. The strange thing is, my orignal message showed up in the Exchange Discussion Group? Geoff... -Original Message- From: TZO Mailer [mailto:mailer;tzo.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:59 AM To: Dale Geoffrey Edwards Subject: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery was attempted, but failed because: 550 This system is configured to reject mail from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (Host blacklisted - see http://maps.vix.com/rbl/) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Original Message: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- TZForward: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 216.91.57.132 by saf.tzo.com id 2002102509570968785 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:57:09 GMT This is where the Message-ID line would go, but I got an error message saying to remove it for delivery purposes. From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Setting up two profiles Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:44:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain List-Unsubscribe: mailto:%%email.unsub%% List-Subscribe: mailto:subscribe-exchange;ls.swynk.com X-URL: http://www.swynk.com/sysapps/ X-List-Host: swynk.com discussion lists http://www.swynk.com Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Message-Id: 37F3E678919F3A45A17EB82CB66A9F7C36AC18@servername.americantower.com Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Right-click on the Outlook Mail icon on the Desktop. Choose properties, the go to profiles. Make the new profile, making sure the name resolves against the Exchange Server and then click the box down below the profiles that says Prompt for a profile. In this matter, he will be able to choose which one he wants. Or show him how open the other mailbox inside his own. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:eve_12uk;yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting up two profiles I run exchange server 5.5 with outlook 2000 as client. However one of our new bosses wants to be able to view his mistrel mail Account in outlook 2000. This mails has to go to a different location from his default mailbox. That he wants two profiles one for mistrel mails account which is private and his usual mailbox in the organisation. I thought of configuring outlook express but he wants to be able to view the mails from his machine in the office and also on a networked laptop in his flat in the same building. Using outlook and not the browser. With exchange this is no problem but I am not sure how to make this possible for mistrel account. Any suggestions on how to configure outlook 2000 to support two profiles. The usual default account for the organisation and one for mistrel. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Delivery failure to exlist@forcefields.com
Sorry. Out of habit, I x out any IP Addresses that may belong to us. The one x'd out is 208.220.171.140. Now when I sent this and it shows up in the list, I will get another error message, saying the same thing. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:esojka;NBME.org] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the IP address you XXX'ed out? I got this message from a previous post, and the IP address wasn't mine... -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nope. No open relay here. Nothing has changed since yesterday when I posted a reply to the Board. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forcefields.com is rejecting because there rbl software is telling them too. Maybe your an open relay. - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:14 AM Subject: FW: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone ever seen this error message before. The strange thing is, my orignal message showed up in the Exchange Discussion Group? Geoff... -Original Message- From: TZO Mailer [mailto:mailer;tzo.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:59 AM To: Dale Geoffrey Edwards Subject: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery was attempted, but failed because: 550 This system is configured to reject mail from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (Host blacklisted - see http://maps.vix.com/rbl/) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Original Message: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- TZForward: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 216.91.57.132 by saf.tzo.com id 2002102509570968785 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:57:09 GMT This is where the Message-ID line would go, but I got an error message saying to remove it for delivery purposes. From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Setting up two profiles Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:44:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain List-Unsubscribe: mailto:%%email.unsub%% List-Subscribe: mailto:subscribe-exchange;ls.swynk.com X-URL: http://www.swynk.com/sysapps/ X-List-Host: swynk.com discussion lists http://www.swynk.com Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Message-Id: 37F3E678919F3A45A17EB82CB66A9F7C36AC18@servername.americantower.com Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Right-click on the Outlook Mail icon on the Desktop. Choose properties, the go to profiles. Make the new profile, making sure the name resolves against the Exchange Server and then click the box down below the profiles that says Prompt for a profile. In this matter, he will be able to choose which one he wants. Or show him how open the other mailbox inside his own. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:eve_12uk;yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting up two profiles I run exchange server 5.5 with outlook 2000 as client. However one of our new bosses wants to be able to view his mistrel mail Account in outlook 2000. This mails has to go to a different location from his default mailbox. That he wants two profiles one for mistrel mails account which is private and his usual mailbox in the organisation. I thought of configuring outlook express but he wants to be able to view the mails from his machine in the office and also on a networked laptop in his flat in the same building. Using outlook and not the browser. With exchange this is no problem but I am not sure how to make this possible for mistrel account. Any suggestions on how to configure outlook 2000 to support two profiles. The usual default account for the organisation and one for mistrel. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Viruses via email
Use Antigen for Exchange and NAV on the desktop. They seem very copasetic together. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Craig A. Mills [mailto:craigam;camnetwork.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Viruses via email use NAV for both Craig A. Mills Computer Aided Management, Inc. 371 Oak Pl., Ste. H Brea, Ca. 92821 (714) 257-0108 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-365265;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Greg Heywood Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unable to render this view error
Err, try searching the KB before posting. It can be very helpful. Try Q184304. Or do another search on :unable to render this view. Geoff... -Original Message- From: brenda [mailto:xp;myrealbox.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unable to render this view error we have an Exchange server 5.5 SP3 (my company is afraid to upgrade to SP4 - but I guess this is another story). and we use IIS on 2000 server for outlook webacess to that server one of our users while trying to read his mail via OWA is getting this error:unable to render this view other users don't report any problem. even this user don't have this problem all the time. most of the time everything works but every few days for few hours he is getting this error. and then it disappear again. any idea how can we fix it? thanks in advance Brenda _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar events
IIRC, if he was editing a calendar item already sent, and removed the Users he did not want to receive the updated item, it would send them a cancellation message. Like I said, IIRC. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events No he was actually just adding the users to the meeting in the scheduling tab. -Alex -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar events Did he by any chance remove the others users from the to and/or cc lists before he sent it? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar events I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a change to add users to a meeting but also sent a cancellation notice to other users. I checked it out and its true. Both messages went at the same time. He never sent a cancellation notice he only added a few users to the meeting and wanted to just send the update to them. An idea's? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEND TO - Mail Attachment lost
What has happened to the people who look things up in the KB or archives. Come on folks. What do you think they are there for? http://search.support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?Catalog=LCID%3D1033% 26CDID%3DEN-US-KB%26PRODLISTSRC%3DONProduct=KeywordType=ALLTitles=falsen umDays=maxResults=25withinResults=Queryl=%22unable+to+mail+attachment+in+ Word%22Query=%22unable+to+mail+attachment+in+Word%22QuerySource=gsfxSearch _Query Probably will wrap. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Paul Done [mailto:pdone;csusb.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEND TO - Mail Attachment lost I have a user who has lost the ability to send a MS Word document from within word by using FILE - SEND TO - MAIL RECIPIENT (As Attachment) Will someone tell me how this can be restored? Thanks, Paul P.S. I have a MAPI email client (Outlook 2k) that use to send this no changes or upgrades to the system or Exchange that I aware or have done. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum Recipients per Message Limit.
See Q265203, Q262145 and Q303759. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:kretchep;uwgb.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum Recipients per Message Limit. In the glory days of Exchange 5.5 there was a reg hack one could do to limit the total number of recipients in a message without having an adverse effect on Distribution Lists being in the message. Now with Exchange 2000 and AD, every recipient in a DL is counted towards the total recipient count. This is quite troublesome when we have several large distribution lists. Is there a workaround to this or is this something we have to live with? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Word as Email editor OutlookExpress
Why would you want to do that? It is not even a good idea to do it with the Outlook client. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:MicrosoftExchangeListServer;csi.exch.cgnet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Word as Email editor OutlookExpress Hi all Do we have anyway to configure OutlookExpress to use MicrosoftWord as email editor? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Word as Email editor OutlookExpress
Why would you want to do that? It is not even a good idea to do it with the Outlook client. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:MicrosoftExchangeListServer;csi.exch.cgnet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Word as Email editor OutlookExpress Hi all Do we have anyway to configure OutlookExpress to use MicrosoftWord as email editor? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum Recipients per Message Limit.
See Q265203, Q262145 and Q303759. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:kretchep;uwgb.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum Recipients per Message Limit. In the glory days of Exchange 5.5 there was a reg hack one could do to limit the total number of recipients in a message without having an adverse effect on Distribution Lists being in the message. Now with Exchange 2000 and AD, every recipient in a DL is counted towards the total recipient count. This is quite troublesome when we have several large distribution lists. Is there a workaround to this or is this something we have to live with? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message journaling
Can anyone recommend a solution? My company wants to keep of copy of every message sent/received. Gèoff... Here you go, Andrey. No. 3. LMAO. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Mail Servers
I think Exchange is intuitive enough to change the servername automagically, if you are talking about changing it in the profile for the User on their machines. At least Exchange 5.5 was intuitive enough to know that if I moved Users from Server A to Server B, the User did not have to do anything. The servername in the profile got changed on the fly. If I am way off the actual topic, I apologize. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Just thought of this one. If you moved people from one server to another then you will most likely have to touch each workstation. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Yes I can what? How should I change the name? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Yes you can. As long as all your workstations are the same. But you should have done it so it would have been transparent to the users. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Changing Mail Servers Thanks to all your help, my new Exchange 2000 email server is up and running pretty smoothly so far. When it is time to go live, what are your suggestion on how to change the server name on my clients? I thought there may be a registry entry that I can use regini with and change it, but I haven't been able to find it yet. There is the option of asking users to do it themselves. I am trying to avoid visiting each user. Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Shut them down in any order you would like. The order in which they are shutdown really only depends on if you are doing a manual shutdown from the command line. Otherwise, stop the DS first, which will take down a couple of others services and then do the rest of manually. It is best to shutdown the services FIRST when you are rebooting the Exchange machine. Takes less time then allowing NT to do it. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 That was not the cause of the shutdown; the dependencies make sure of the correct order. It had to do with the IS and how it was flushing buffers which was addressed, finally, in SP3. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
Also, if it is burned to a CD, you will have read only access to the .pst file. You will need to copy it to your hard drive or wherever, in order to do anything more than read. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've always preferred OWA myself. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge issue
What do you mean it failed. What specifically happened? You could have a corrupted mailbox. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge issue FAQ 3.5.A3 references 3.71 being current, I have found a reference for Exmerge 6 for Exchange 2000 is this the version you are referring to? I have also tried a straight export from OL2000 client to .pst, this failed also. Could I be looking at IS inconsistencies? Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exmerge issue Get the new version and run it on a 2000 machine that is on the same network. Works fine. The new version has better logging among other things. - Original Message - From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: exmerge issue I am trying to exmerge a dozen users on an Ex 5.5 (sp4) NT 4 (sp6a) and having trouble. The exmerge log is reporting many of the following items: Error copying message with subject 'Whatever subject is' in folder '\Inbox' (Whatever folder is). (MAPI_W_PARTIAL_COMPLETION) I have looked at Q174197 which was not very helpful. I am running Exmerge 3.71 with the same mapi32.dll that is in the winroot\system32 directory. I did not find any other relavent Q articles. The majority of dropped messages appear to have attachments (if that means anything to the price of tea in China). Example user A has 180mb reported Priv Information Store, exmerge estimates 350Mb pst, 45Mb PST is the result. Thanks for any help. Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge issue
However, I have run into a bug with ExMerge 2000. Not quite sure what it is, however, I am able to ExMerge the data from the Exchange Server into a .pst file. But, when I go to import the file into the new mailbox, it will hang and then give the error Exchange cannot yada, yada, yada connect to the information store. Then I go back and use ExMerge 3.71 to import the data back in. Yes, everything is on Win2k with all the appropriate SP, hotfixes, facelifts, etc. Curious, eh! Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exmerge issue Exmerge for 2000 only runs on a 2000 box workstation OK It has better error logging. But even better has explanations for common problem in the document that comes with it. Look there. It is in Exchange 2000 SP3 - Original Message - From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:44 AM Subject: RE: exmerge issue FAQ 3.5.A3 references 3.71 being current, I have found a reference for Exmerge 6 for Exchange 2000 is this the version you are referring to? I have also tried a straight export from OL2000 client to .pst, this failed also. Could I be looking at IS inconsistencies? Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exmerge issue Get the new version and run it on a 2000 machine that is on the same network. Works fine. The new version has better logging among other things. - Original Message - From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: exmerge issue I am trying to exmerge a dozen users on an Ex 5.5 (sp4) NT 4 (sp6a) and having trouble. The exmerge log is reporting many of the following items: Error copying message with subject 'Whatever subject is' in folder '\Inbox' (Whatever folder is). (MAPI_W_PARTIAL_COMPLETION) I have looked at Q174197 which was not very helpful. I am running Exmerge 3.71 with the same mapi32.dll that is in the winroot\system32 directory. I did not find any other relavent Q articles. The majority of dropped messages appear to have attachments (if that means anything to the price of tea in China). Example user A has 180mb reported Priv Information Store, exmerge estimates 350Mb pst, 45Mb PST is the result. Thanks for any help. Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nt event service won't start, corrupted event log files
Save them first, if you can, then whack em. You might want to increase the log file size also. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nt event service won't start, corrupted event log files Clear the logs? -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Nt event service won't start, corrupted event log files The event service will not start due to corrupted event logs. Does anyone have a solution or any idea. I am running NT 4.0 SP6a. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy .jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA service just quits...
Since you didn't provide your environment, I will speculate that maybe one of the drives is low on disk space. I would check the various drives and see. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA service just quits... What would cause the MTA service to just quit? Every so often it dies, then I restart it, and it dies a few days later... Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
A number of reasons: AOL frequently is down; AOL is being blocked at your IMC; message too large; attachment too large, etc. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution List
You already have the spreadsheet. Add the appropriate column headings and import them into Exchange with Exchange Administrator/Tools/Directory Import. Just make sure you have the correct column headings, or it will turn into a vicious nightmare (or daymare, depending on where you are). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Distribution List Ummm Im no guru with exchnage 55 or 2k But me thinks there is limit of addresses in 55. I seem to remember hitting like a little over 200 is all I could get into a DL. I tried about a year ago to add like 700 to a DL for faxing and remember getting a error from OL.. True this was not a server DL like you mention a Dl in OL2k for a user just 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Distribution List You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file
Automagically. No. But you can do a regular import, point it to the .csv file and just import the contact items. Do not import duplicates is an option. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange with 2 email address
Add the other domain to the Routing tab on the IMC. Then add the additional SMTP address to the first mailbox you created. (If this is what you were trying to accomplish -- I was unsure of what your email was trying to convey). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
No, it shouldn't be making it through your Antigen/Sophos or Worm AV. I have seen it, and Antigen purged it. Geoff... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Gulp! Either it's making it thru Sophos and Antigen or I'm not getting any. I sure hope it's the latter. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Content Filtering
Sybari Antigen for Exchange is an excellent package. We use it and are very happy with the automatic updates and the content filtering. Also you can create templates to distribute new changes (upgrades are free for the life of your contract). They are releasing their Gold Package at MEC, and were voted Best of Show for their Gold Package -- Antigen 7.0. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Excellent that works for me. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Not what, but who. I am the most reliable content filter for Exchange. For only $375k (plus 125k annual maint) I'll come filter your mail. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/2002 8:52 AM Subject: Content Filtering Hi all, I just had a quick question in regards to a content filter add on and which would be the best to use for Exchange 5.5. Currently we are using NEMX but I would like to explore other options. What do you all feel is the most reliable content filter? Thanks, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Content Filtering
Antigen has scanned the message body since the previous v6.5. Here is a direct quote from Sybari: Both Antigen 6.5 and 7.0 both provide the ability to scan the message body for viruses at both the SMTP/IMC and the Exchange Store. We have provided this as an option to enable/disable at the store for both realtime scanning and manual scanning for performance reasons. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Thanks, I haven't had the chance to check it out. I think we may roll our own SMTP content filter for the W2K SMTP Service that is modeled much like SPAM Assassin. Or I would like to get my hands on that RBL blocking script that Siegfried has been working on. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering OK. I just installed it and took a look. Content filtering seems to be the same as in version 6.5 First of all it only scans message subject lines. You give it a word to look for and it scans. If it finds a message with that word in the subject it can purge that message or quarantine it. Some of the leading content scanners like MimeSweeper scan the entire message, not just the subject. Also they use weighting. One can assign different weights to different words or expressions. Then if a message has enough of these words and/or expressions that the total weight is above the predefined threshold, an action could be taken against that message. And usually there is a bigger variety of actions (purge, quarantine, archive, forward, auto-reply, run custom script or executable, etc.) -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Yes you do. I expect a full report on my desk by 8am tomorrow. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I was going to but haven't had a chance yet. I guess I need to take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Have you installed or tested 7.0? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Antigen is great for virus scanning, but they have only recently gotten into content scanning. And their content scanning is very basic so far. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Sybari Antigen for Exchange is an excellent package. We use it and are very happy with the automatic updates and the content filtering. Also you can create templates to distribute new changes (upgrades are free for the life of your contract). They are releasing their Gold Package at MEC, and were voted Best of Show for their Gold Package -- Antigen 7.0. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Excellent that works for me. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Not what, but who. I am the most reliable content filter for Exchange. For only $375k (plus 125k annual maint) I'll come filter your mail. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/2002 8:52 AM Subject: Content Filtering Hi all, I just had a quick question in regards to a content filter add on and which would be the best to use for Exchange 5.5. Currently we are using NEMX but I would like to explore other options. What do you all feel is the most reliable content filter? Thanks, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Content Filtering
No, I am sorry that you are wrong. This applies to content filtering as well. I may have misread the first email, thinking they were talking about virus scanning, but Antigen does do CF on the subject line AND body of the emails and attachments. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering That's applies to virus scanning not content filtering. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Antigen has scanned the message body since the previous v6.5. Here is a direct quote from Sybari: Both Antigen 6.5 and 7.0 both provide the ability to scan the message body for viruses at both the SMTP/IMC and the Exchange Store. We have provided this as an option to enable/disable at the store for both realtime scanning and manual scanning for performance reasons. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Thanks, I haven't had the chance to check it out. I think we may roll our own SMTP content filter for the W2K SMTP Service that is modeled much like SPAM Assassin. Or I would like to get my hands on that RBL blocking script that Siegfried has been working on. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering OK. I just installed it and took a look. Content filtering seems to be the same as in version 6.5 First of all it only scans message subject lines. You give it a word to look for and it scans. If it finds a message with that word in the subject it can purge that message or quarantine it. Some of the leading content scanners like MimeSweeper scan the entire message, not just the subject. Also they use weighting. One can assign different weights to different words or expressions. Then if a message has enough of these words and/or expressions that the total weight is above the predefined threshold, an action could be taken against that message. And usually there is a bigger variety of actions (purge, quarantine, archive, forward, auto-reply, run custom script or executable, etc.) -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Yes you do. I expect a full report on my desk by 8am tomorrow. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I was going to but haven't had a chance yet. I guess I need to take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Have you installed or tested 7.0? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Antigen is great for virus scanning, but they have only recently gotten into content scanning. And their content scanning is very basic so far. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Sybari Antigen for Exchange is an excellent package. We use it and are very happy with the automatic updates and the content filtering. Also you can create templates to distribute new changes (upgrades are free for the life of your contract). They are releasing their Gold Package at MEC, and were voted Best of Show for their Gold Package -- Antigen 7.0. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Excellent that works for me. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Not what, but who. I am the most reliable content filter for Exchange. For only $375k (plus 125k annual maint) I'll come filter your mail. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/2002 8:52 AM Subject: Content Filtering Hi all, I just had a quick question in regards to a content filter add on and which would be the best to use for Exchange 5.5. Currently we are using NEMX but I would like to explore other options. What do you all feel is the most reliable content filter? Thanks, Brian
RE: ADC Synching
Right now, we have one DC for every ADC that the CAs replicate against. It's not like I am trying to pull from all thirteen (13) 5.5 Servers. I just want to be able to add a new User, say in 5.5, out West, and replicate that 5.5 against the DC allocated to it here in the NorthEast, and see the changes quickly in the GAL. This is not happening. What we have to do now, is log into a mailbox (or the Exchange Admin program) that exists on the 5.5 Server, and see that it was replicated. Any other thoughts? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Synching Do you have multiple domain controllers? Maybe they are not replicating well? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Synching Okay, with one answer, I will post the following: What could be causing the CAs in the ADC to take more than two (2) hours and sometimes longer to replicate from 5.5 to the AD. This is a big problem when an Administrator is on E2k and cannot see the new User that was created two (2) hours ago on the 5.5 server and needs to be able to put them in the proper DLs, etc. Anyone got any idea why it might take this long? TIA Geoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Synching a few seconds, maybe a minute -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Synching Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k, SP3 on Wink2k, SP2. Scenario: Add a new User to one of our other thirteen (13) 5.5 servers and replicate with the 5.5 bridgehead. Then go to ADC, find that CA between the site and AD, click on Schedule, tick off Replicate the entire directory, blah, blah blah, apply and the do a replicate now. How soon have others seen the changes flow from 5.5 to show up in the E2k Global Address List in the Outlook client? Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wrong address pops up in OL2k
Sure. Turn off auto-name checking. Type in the SMTP name (i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and let it resolve. It should stay that way from then on. Then, if you want, turn auto-name checking back on. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Wrong address pops up in OL2k Here's the situation: Mike (the user) wants to send an email to Heather (who is external to our organization). Heather is in Mike's Contacts list, and to email Heather he just types Heather in OL's To: field and everything is fine. Heather's email address has recently changed. Mike changed her entry in his Contacts to reflect the new address, but when he types Heather in the To: field now, it resolves to her old email address. I've confirmed that she is the only Heather in his Contacts, and that her email address as entered there is the current one. Any ideas? Thanks! ___ Chris Levis Applied Geographics, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC Synching
Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k, SP3 on Wink2k, SP2. Scenario: Add a new User to one of our other thirteen (13) 5.5 servers and replicate with the 5.5 bridgehead. Then go to ADC, find that CA between the site and AD, click on Schedule, tick off Replicate the entire directory, blah, blah blah, apply and the do a replicate now. How soon have others seen the changes flow from 5.5 to show up in the E2k Global Address List in the Outlook client? Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Synching
Okay, with one answer, I will post the following: What could be causing the CAs in the ADC to take more than two (2) hours and sometimes longer to replicate from 5.5 to the AD. This is a big problem when an Administrator is on E2k and cannot see the new User that was created two (2) hours ago on the 5.5 server and needs to be able to put them in the proper DLs, etc. Anyone got any idea why it might take this long? TIA Geoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Synching a few seconds, maybe a minute -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Synching Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k, SP3 on Wink2k, SP2. Scenario: Add a new User to one of our other thirteen (13) 5.5 servers and replicate with the 5.5 bridgehead. Then go to ADC, find that CA between the site and AD, click on Schedule, tick off Replicate the entire directory, blah, blah blah, apply and the do a replicate now. How soon have others seen the changes flow from 5.5 to show up in the E2k Global Address List in the Outlook client? Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: changing location of sent item in outlook 2000
How about New Message/Options/Save Sent Message To: wherever you want to save it. Works just fine. Thanks. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: changing location of sent item in outlook 2000 Hi people In outlook 2000 when I reply to a message in a shared mail box the copy of the sent message goes to my sent item folder, how do I change the location to the sent item of the shared mailbox. Is there a registry settings that I can modify. I was able to do it with the deleted item but not sent item. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch
Did you re-apply the same Exchange SP to your workstation as what is on the Exchange Server? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch How about http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q322051? Was posted as a possible answer by an MS guy in the newsgroups to a similar sounding issue. -Original Message- From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch Hi there. I applied the January Windows 2000 security rollup package to my laptop (W2K SP2) after which I could no longer connect to the 5.5 SP4 Server using the Admin app. I uninstalled the patch and Admin finds the server again. This happened on a desktop I tried also. Obviously I want my laptop secured. I'm presuming that W2K SP3 will produce the same results what with it being a cumulative SP. The error is as follows: Microsoft Exchange Directory ID no: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM I checked microsoft's site and found nothing. Any help would be much appreciated. Pete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
Except in Microsoft's Office Suites. Don't know about the new ones, but the old ones you could not jump to SP3 from SP1 without applying SP2. I remember doing this some years ago. Maybe 3 years. So maybe it was Office98??? IDR. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
OWA2000 looks like a striped down version of the Outlook client. We have used it extensively in my office here, and every likes the new interface and all the bells and whistles that go along with it. Of course, we added Outlook Plus Pak for OWA2000 which is a great product from MessageOne (a little plug for you, Chris!!). Geoff... -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Our users have complained about OWA (5.5)... Is OWA any better (more user friendly) in Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name 2 or use OWA -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Hi All, Is there a way to have Outlook NOT rename the Exchange Server after it resolved the server address? Our situation: Internally, the server is named MAIL It can be reached via the web at TEST.company.com When we configure Outlook, we enter TEST.company.com and it validates the user... Then it changes the server name to MAIL. Of course, Outlook will no longer work because the address MAIL is not valid on the net. We have 2 solutions, but we do not like either: 1) Add HOSTS table entry on remote machines (but then they fail internally) 2) Require VPN connection Of course, had I foreseen this issue, I would have named the Exchange server TEST.company.com to begin with (assuming that is even possible). Thanks for any ideas/insight, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
Jeesh. After all that and I typed in the wrong name. It is www.messageware.com. Sorry for the confusion. Geoff... -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name What is Outlook Plus Pak? And where can you find it? I checked www.messageone.com, and did not see any reference to it... Thanks! -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name OWA2000 looks like a striped down version of the Outlook client. We have used it extensively in my office here, and every likes the new interface and all the bells and whistles that go along with it. Of course, we added Outlook Plus Pak for OWA2000 which is a great product from MessageOne (a little plug for you, Chris!!). Geoff... -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Our users have complained about OWA (5.5)... Is OWA any better (more user friendly) in Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name 2 or use OWA -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Hi All, Is there a way to have Outlook NOT rename the Exchange Server after it resolved the server address? Our situation: Internally, the server is named MAIL It can be reached via the web at TEST.company.com When we configure Outlook, we enter TEST.company.com and it validates the user... Then it changes the server name to MAIL. Of course, Outlook will no longer work because the address MAIL is not valid on the net. We have 2 solutions, but we do not like either: 1) Add HOSTS table entry on remote machines (but then they fail internally) 2) Require VPN connection Of course, had I foreseen this issue, I would have named the Exchange server TEST.company.com to begin with (assuming that is even possible). Thanks for any ideas/insight, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: urgent backup problem
Remember to apply the same Exchange SP to your workstation that has been applied to Exchange. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04)
RE: BCC problems in Public Folders
Ahh, maybe look at the original sent message in his Sent Items folder? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has some BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there anyway to see the info in the BCC field? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
I can attest for Chris asking the odd technical questions in this forum and others[1] as I have answered them. I don't remember what it was he asked, but he was grateful.[1][2] Geoff... [1] Not remembering comes with age. :) [2] I an not even going to go anywhere near the spanking part! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) My conclusion is that you should work on your skills related to asking a technical question. No, one doesn't need to know the answer to a question to be able to formulate a question about it. Sometimes that even hinders the process. I'm still learning about Exchange daily, and still ask the odd technical question in this forum and others. Some of them could probably be phrased better, and on occasion I've even been spanked for one reason or another.[1] Since you asked, let's look at your question and see how it could have been improved: I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) My revised version: I've been looking on the web and the Exchange help files for documentation[2] of the different levels of logging related to the diagnostics tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5)[3]. Does anyone know if there is a document on the web[4] which details what is logged at the different levels? (Init Archival) If so, could you please provide a link?[6] /Some/ of what you are looking for is documented, but a complete and comprehensive document is not available. In response to the above question you might have gotten links to some of the information along with a suggestion to test for the rest. If /I/ were asking the question, I might have included information on why I was looking for the information. General curiosity isn't one of the reasons I generally do Exchange research though unfortunately. However, including that information would help prevent someone from pondering why you wanted it and perhaps presenting other peripheral (and incorrect) solutions based on assumptions the reader made. [1] I am still grateful to a firewall admin of mine who made me read RFC821 before he's answer anymore of my SMTP related questions. The bastard. [2] Shows what you have already done in this regard. Saves you (hopefully) from receiving an answer of STFW or RTFM in the event you simply missed it. [3] You included the Exchange version and specific tab which was nice. [4] A query for pre-existing documentation.[5] [5] Since I've seen people ask questions where the underlying assumption was someone will whip up a 12 page treatise on a subject, it's a nice touch. [6] Saves you from someone simply answering yes to the question Does anyone know.. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) So what is your conclusion Chris? Should I first learn everything I need to know before I ask a question so that my question can be accurately written? Wouldn't that mean that I wouldn't have to ask the question? I am confused. That question was properly phrase relative to my knowledge of Exchange. I can see how to you it would be poorly phrase but you don't seem to remember that we all start out as newbies to exchange, even you. How did you learn? Did you do everything on your own? If you did, I admire that. I am more likely to bet that you asked question along the way. Just because your knowledge of Exchange is where I want to get my knowledge level doesn't mean that you have to look down on the little people...or does it? I wouldn't know because I haven't got there yet... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCC problems in Public Folders
Maybe go to Recover Deleted Items, if he did not SHIFT Delete them? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders That's what I was hoping for but he's deleted those. Quite awhile ago -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders Ahh, maybe look at the original sent message in his Sent Items folder? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has some BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there anyway to see the info in the BCC field? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
I can attest for Chris asking *the odd technical questions in this forum and others*[1] as I have answered them. I don't remember what it was he asked, but he was grateful.[1][2] Geoff... [1] Not remembering comes with age. :) [2] I an not even going to go anywhere near the spanking part! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) My conclusion is that you should work on your skills related to asking a technical question. No, one doesn't need to know the answer to a question to be able to formulate a question about it. Sometimes that even hinders the process. I'm still learning about Exchange daily, and still ask the odd technical question in this forum and others. Some of them could probably be phrased better, and on occasion I've even been spanked for one reason or another.[1] Since you asked, let's look at your question and see how it could have been improved: I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) My revised version: I've been looking on the web and the Exchange help files for documentation[2] of the different levels of logging related to the diagnostics tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5)[3]. Does anyone know if there is a document on the web[4] which details what is logged at the different levels? (Init Archival) If so, could you please provide a link?[6] /Some/ of what you are looking for is documented, but a complete and comprehensive document is not available. In response to the above question you might have gotten links to some of the information along with a suggestion to test for the rest. If /I/ were asking the question, I might have included information on why I was looking for the information. General curiosity isn't one of the reasons I generally do Exchange research though unfortunately. However, including that information would help prevent someone from pondering why you wanted it and perhaps presenting other peripheral (and incorrect) solutions based on assumptions the reader made. [1] I am still grateful to a firewall admin of mine who made me read RFC821 before he's answer anymore of my SMTP related questions. The bastard. [2] Shows what you have already done in this regard. Saves you (hopefully) from receiving an answer of STFW or RTFM in the event you simply missed it. [3] You included the Exchange version and specific tab which was nice. [4] A query for pre-existing documentation.[5] [5] Since I've seen people ask questions where the underlying assumption was someone will whip up a 12 page treatise on a subject, it's a nice touch. [6] Saves you from someone simply answering yes to the question Does anyone know.. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) So what is your conclusion Chris? Should I first learn everything I need to know before I ask a question so that my question can be accurately written? Wouldn't that mean that I wouldn't have to ask the question? I am confused. That question was properly phrase relative to my knowledge of Exchange. I can see how to you it would be poorly phrase but you don't seem to remember that we all start out as newbies to exchange, even you. How did you learn? Did you do everything on your own? If you did, I admire that. I am more likely to bet that you asked question along the way. Just because your knowledge of Exchange is where I want to get my knowledge level doesn't mean that you have to look down on the little people...or does it? I wouldn't know because I haven't got there yet... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Password expiration
You might try Q262902. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Password expiration Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the users are getting the password will expire in 0 days message. I've searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this message? Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pop error?
Mmmm. Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and there was no success. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life to provide you with the right qb article. Sarcasm -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? um, not the right error - this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC Authentication Rich -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pop error? anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by googling... jeremy Event Type: Error Event Source: POP3SVC Event Category: Authentication Event ID: 1011 Date: 9/6/2002 Time: 6:32:23 PM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with error 0x426. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 49 02 4b 00 I.K. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pop error?
Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously. Did you notice that your email got there before mine? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? I gave him that one already it didnt work. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? Mmmm. Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and there was no success. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life to provide you with the right qb article. Sarcasm -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? um, not the right error - this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC Authentication Rich -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pop error? anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by googling... jeremy Event Type: Error Event Source: POP3SVC Event Category: Authentication Event ID: 1011 Date: 9/6/2002 Time: 6:32:23 PM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with error 0x426. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 49 02 4b 00 I.K. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Antigen v6.5 by Sybari. Gold package coming out soon, which will have additional features. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What would you recommend? I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works great. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in the top 10). -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Keep in mind that when you look in the Event Viewer, if the online defrag does not show an enormous amount of space regained (10GB+), I would not even do the offline defrag. Most of the time EV comes back with only MB of space recoverable. I think it is only feasible when you can reclaim a LARGE amount of disk space. The time and resources have to be taken into account also. Geoff... -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Then guess a defrag would be your way forward, or a move of one of the stores somewhere else. Unless u wait until an online defrag runs...to see if that makes any kind of impact. David -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete no we dont use retension. Thanks -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain according to your settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted items. -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Exchange Delete
You need at least 110% the size of your priv.edb file in order to do the offline defrag. One good (bad?) thing is you can redirect it to another server/workstation if you want to through the switches. I have done many with 5.5 and our timeframe is the Servers go offline at 8:00 p.m. EST (to give the West time to finish business), and are not available until 6:00 a.m., Monday morning. Believe me, sometimes you need all that time. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time. Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need temp space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites the info stor. Under Diaster Recovery Q article it will walk you thru using the offline defrag tool under eseutil isinteg. The online defrag that generally runs every evening will only get back space from your deleted items folders after they expire. In my case I have it set to 30 days before removing them from the server. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Sorry! Meant to say 8:00 p.m. EST, Friday night through 6:00 a.m. EST, Monday morning. If you meant your online defrag is only showing 72MB that will be freed, then FAI. It would take too much time and resources to do it. Just my .02¢ Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Oucch, Thanks for the info guys, by the way the online backup is freeing up about 72mb 2-3 times a day. RGDS Rich -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete You need at least 110% the size of your priv.edb file in order to do the offline defrag. One good (bad?) thing is you can redirect it to another server/workstation if you want to through the switches. I have done many with 5.5 and our timeframe is the Servers go offline at 8:00 p.m. EST (to give the West time to finish business), and are not available until 6:00 a.m., Monday morning. Believe me, sometimes you need all that time. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time. Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need temp space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites the info stor. Under Diaster Recovery Q article it will walk you thru using the offline defrag tool under eseutil isinteg. The online defrag that generally runs every evening will only get back space from your deleted items folders after they expire. In my case I have it set to 30 days before removing them from the server. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: need ammo
IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
I guess the best answer would be business-related. What is the standard size of attachments that are sent to a company? I would say that if your company were an advertising agency, then you would need larger limits, due to the graphic file, etc. If your company was a law firm, you would need even larger limits. But if your company only exchanges emails messages and rarely sends back and forth attachments, the default could be no limit. As I said at the beginning -- it is all related to the type of business, IMHO. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo At my last gig we routinely received e-mail messages which were 200MB+. 5-10MB limits would have been laughed at. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
