Delivery Options vs Delegates
Dear DL Members, What do each of the following mean, and what is the difference / subtle difference? Exchange 5.5 Exchange Admin Program Delivery Options (tab) Give Send On Behalf Of permission to My Name Here Outlook 2000 Tools Options Delegates (tab) My Name Here Thank you. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
Dear Trevor, In addition, you will experience a port conflict. Active Directory, on the Domain Controller, and Exchange 2000 will both want to use the same port number. I do not remember what the port number is, but I believe that it is the port used for LDAP by Exchange. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC There are good and bad reasons to do most anything. The # of mailboxes on a server, by itself, is not all that indicative of hardware requirements for many reasons. However, for what passes for normal requirements in my experience you have way more server than you need so it will probably perform well, all things being equal. You need at least 2 DCs in each domain and in small environments one being an Exchange Server is not unusual. DCs in small shops don't need to be high performance boxes but I would hardware mirror the OS on each. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trevor Porter Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Dear Paul, Back on Thursday, April 12, 2001, I wrote a Haiku memorializing Windows Messaging. Windows Messaging, more than a utility, powerful, simple. Able to resolve, Administrator's best friend, Never forgotten!! For those who need more, there is the following Q Article. Q254458 It is found on the November 1998 MS Select Server CD. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 09:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Paul, It is either available on 5.0 CD or Select CD's (could be elsewhere) but that's where I get mine. If haven't got it wait until after 18:00 GMT then you will ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online Defragmentation
Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Dear Andy, Thank you. How much consecutive time should I give for this process? What are your settings (out of curiosity)? At the present (some of it will change), I have all 7 days looking the same, and each day has four hours total, given to this process. There are two two-hour blocks. The first taking place from 12:01 AM till 1:59 AM. The second taking place from 11:01 AM till 12:59 PM. If I only allocate one hour, and the process starts but does not finish, will it actually stop until the next selected block of time? I am led to think so. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
Dear Chris, The next time you are in the Greater Wawa Area, let me know. Nobody does it better than Wawa. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 03:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku In all my travels Still there remains no contest To Dunkins' crullers -Original Message- From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku My first Kreme a treat then reality hits must run to bathroom Jason Rader From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:48:53 -0800 A Krispy Kreme fix? More like Krispy Kreme broken. Lotus Domino. (telnet mail.krispykreme.com 25) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Couch Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Maui No Ka Oi Krispy Kreme is on it's way Up ten pounds I'll go. We no longer need To fly to Las Vegas to Get our Krispy fix. Aloha, Don Couch Systems Administrator/Facilities Manager 808-891-7915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pacific Disaster Center/East West Center 590 Lipoa Parkway Suite 259 Kihei, HI. 96753 -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku This is intriguing The fuss about Krispy Kreme None in Hawaii. Some clamour for An island Krispy Kreme shop. In-N-Out first, please. (http://www.inandout.com/) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am very sad For it seems to be that you have misspelt Krappy When in search of an elliptical dough then please Make mine a bagel. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions I noted that recently there's been a lack of Friday Haiku, thus since Im a poor writter myself I have these few from a recent thread from some friends...As we just got a Krispy Kreme down the roadI pass along these writting from the thread... to you and others .. .. In dark ages past We were denied Krispy Kremes Now we are redeemed! ( That first line of yours Not five beats by a long shot You should try again ) Donuts tempt me. I yield like Homer Simpson. Diet tomorrow. Bane of my diet My sugary tormentor Krispy Kremes defeat me Jeans are getting tight. Krispy Kremes taste good, but no... I'll have a carrot Bodacious carb rings Some filled, all dipped in sugar Enhance my fatness Krispy Kremes are fried. They plug up my arteries. Oops...a heart attack. Less than a week left Oh ... the doughnuts will be hot I want them all now! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your
W32/Bugbear@MM - No File Attachment
Dear DL Members, At Wawa, on the Exchange Servers, we are running GroupShield 4.0.4. The Scan Engine (4160) and DAT files (4227) are up to date. GroupShield is detecting and quarantining the W32/Bugbear@MM virus, as long as the infected e-mail message has an actual file attachment. If the infected e-mail message does not have a file attachment, GroupShield is not detecting it, thus we have some PCs and Laptops that get infected, and our Network Printers and Shared Printers print off over 100 pages of garbled text. Common to these e-mail messages with not files attachments is, they are all HTML (as opposed to Rich Text or Plain Text). Is anyone else with GroupShield experiencing this problem? What are you doing, to the Exchange Servers, to fix this? I can open these e-mail messages from my Laptop, which has the latest version of the Scan Engine and DAT files, without getting infected. Having the client Scan Engine and DAT files is a solution, and we are working on it. Let me know. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA service just quits...
Dear Dustin, On what Drive does your MTA exist? Are you running out of Disk Space on that Drive? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 01:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA service just quits... What would cause the MTA service to just quit? Every so often it dies, then I restart it, and it dies a few days later... Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Client
Dear Yanek, Back on Thursday, April 12, 2001, I wrote a Haiku memorializing Windows Messaging. Windows Messaging, more than a utility, powerful, simple. Able to resolve, Administrator's best friend, Never forgotten!! For those who need more, there is the following Q Article. Q254458 It is found on the November 1998 MS Select Server CD. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 04:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Client We may be working with a client who needs to test their software on a system with the old Exchange Client installed. I know nothing about this client. Where can we get it? Does it cost? More info appreciated... -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Dear Dot, Virtual Private Network. I have Verizon DSL at home. Wawa has a VPN. It is not as good as sitting at my desk, but it is way better than 56k RAS. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 08:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Dear Martin and Don, If you are that good, I could get both of you jobs on the Network and Communications Team here at Wawa. The VPN Project at Wawa was (and is) not easy. Think about it, you could drink all of the Wawa brand drinks for free, all work day long, and have access to all the Scrapple you could eat Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 02:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Putting the rack mount brackets on -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Friday afternoon fun
Dear List Members, There were two links given below. Most of you have commented on the helicopter game. I prefer the gun shooting game. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 02:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Mine was 20 but that was when I first started and didn't have a clue how to play and didn't feel like reading any further than Click to start. After three times of 20 I figured I better read further. -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 27 -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:20 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Friday afternoon fun Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 890 What uppp what is the worst score anyone has gotten? anyone less then 50? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 646 here - Just call me ROOKIE! -- From: Tener, Richard Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1493 I gotta stop playing this thing -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1176 so far.. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:46 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 576 ... more practise needed ! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 950 HA ha!!! the simple games are always the most addictive. jeremy -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I got a distance of 798 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5
Dear Jeff, Are you sure it is the Store that is growing, or are you noticing less and less available disk space? Check to see if you are archiving your Internet e-mail messages, both inbound and outbound. d:\exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive etc. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 09:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5 The space was freed up within the database. The database won't reduce in size without compacting it. You might want to review the list archives. We've covered this at least two times in the last week. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jeff Toates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5 My exchange database seems to keep growing and growing. We moved some users from one server to another thinking that this would free up some space on the original server. Once we moved users it didn't free up any additional space. How do I free up that space? Thanks, Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: open relay
Dear Kim, Q153119 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 09:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: open relay I haven't done any testing, don't know how to... the hostmaster at our ISP has done a test and was able to send mail via our server... How do I test it myself? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: open relay Why do you say it seems to be an open relay? What testing have you done? - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:24 AM Subject: open relay Hi, I followed the steps described in http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/mail/excrelay.asp but still my server seems to be an open relay... Help! Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Supporting Outlook as an Exchange Admin - Poll
Dear Ron, I am third level support for Outlook 2000. First Level = PC Hotline (help desk) Second Level = PC and Laptop Technicians (I teach / train them regularly) Third Level = Exchange Admin (me) Any time a new client issue shows up, I document the fix and place the MS Word document into an Exchange Public Folder. The PC Hotline and the Technicians have reviewer access to this folder. If a call gets escalated to me, it is either a new issue (and un-documented) or the Call Taker is in trouble (with me). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 02:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Supporting Outlook as an Exchange Admin - Poll What is the general consensus on supporting the client as an Exchange admin. To me it would seem helpful to know all the toys/options/features in exchange's clients to test, and to implement new options to the users... but what if users call about client issues? would that be a helpdesk function? I'm just curious if your jobs combine supporting the client side as well as the server side. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA Problems?
Dear Tim, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q296879 (link may wrap) Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Kalligonis, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 02:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems? NT4 SP6a, Exch 5.5 SP4, GSE4.5 SP1 HF7 I am having an odd problem with the MTA on the bridgehead of my central site. The MTA is working sometimes. It works fine for awhile then the messages will start backing up in the queues going to the servers in the same site (same network segment as well) and other sites. They will move very slowly about 1-3 every minute. They messages will build up to anywhere from 200-500 in a queue, then all of a sudden they will fly out of the queue within 30 seconds. This is after about 30-45 minutes of backing up in the queue. Another thing I noticed is the queues from the other servers in this site to the problem server are NOT backing up. This is what I have done: Turned up diag logging levels to max for everything in the MTA. Did not receive any error or warning messages. Just info. MTACHECK multiple times and came back with no problems. For connectivity... telnet from problem server to other server in site on port 110...no problem Rebooted the server... didn't help I have my network guys looking at the sniffer watching the packs to and from this server, but they don't see anything unusual. Any thoughts? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Administration Advice
Dear Mike, 01. Create an Exchange mailbox on each of your Exchange Servers. 02. Create two Inbox Rules in each mailbox. Rule 01 will send you a reply Rule 02 will send the Help Desk a reply 03. Create a System Distribution List containing all of the mailboxes. 04. Hide the mailboxes. Send an e-mail message to the SDL every morning and just before leaving every day. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 04:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Administration Advice Hello, Myself being relatively new to Exchange 2000 Server Administration, am looking for some very brief advice as to what the top 10 things are to stay on top of, in order to ensure a smooth running system. You can read all the books you want, but there is no better information than hearing first hand from real-world Exchange Administrators. Would some of you be so kind as to reply with a few tips as to what I need to keep my eyes on? For example, log files growing out of control, security issues that I not be aware of, etc. ALSO, there is one thing I am trying to figure out - and that is under a Mailbox Store I created, there is a Mailbox called SystemMailbox with 826 'Total Items' in there. How can I view the contents of that Mailbox? Is this possibly bounced mail messages, or something else? Thank you all VERY much for your replies, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Host Unreachable and Network Error During Host Resolution
Dear DL Members, On any given business day, we have e-mail messages queued at the Internet Mail Service (Outbound messages awaiting delivery). Normally, there is one of two error categories associated with these queued up e-mail messages. 01. Host Unreachable 02. Network Error During Host Resolution The following is a document that I would like to give to Wawa's Help Desk, to help them with handling these sorts of calls (our End Users receive notification messages once every 4 hours, up till 48 hours). I am not sure that I fully understand these two error categories. Let me know what you think about the document below. = E-mail messages queued at the Internet Mail Service. This document has been created to assist the PC Hotline with resolving issues when an e-mail message is queued at the Internet Mail Service on an Exchange Server. 01. Open a call in the Applix Database. 02. Ask the Outlook User to forward the Notification message to the PC Hotline. 03. Forward the Notification message to the NT Team. Include the Call Number in the subject line. 04. The NT Team needs to check the Outbound Queues and find the error category. Host Unreachable MX Record is known by Wawa's ISP (Verio). Fire Wall (of Intended Recipient) may be down. IMC Service (of Intended Recipient) may be stopped (due to virus, etc.). Intended Recipient's Personal ISP may be experiencing problems. Network Error During Host Resolution MX Record is unknown by Wawa's ISP (Verio). Intended Recipient's Start of Authority (SOA) is not reaching Wawa's ISP (Verio). 05. The NT Team needs to report back to the PC Hotline. 06. The PC Hotline contacts the Outlook User, providing the appropriate information. Test One Ask the Intended Recipient to send a test e-mail message to the Original Sender, and see if the Original Sender can successfully reply to the message, without the reply getting queued up. If the test fails, have the Original Sender contact the Intended Recipient with the following information, based on the appropriate error category. Host Unreachable A. The Intended Recipient should contact his or her Help Desk and ask them to bring the following information to the attention of the System Administrator. B. Inquire about any problems related to their e-mail servers or Fire Wall. Network Error During Host Resolution A. The Intended Recipient should contact his or her Help Desk and ask them to bring the following information to the attention of the System Administrator. B. Wawa's ISP, Verio, does not have an MX Record for the Intended Recipient's e-mail domain in their DNS tables. C. Please check with your Start of Authority (SOA) to make sure that they are properly replicating your MX Record across the Internet. = Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Upgrade
Dear Jeff, I think that the jump in your plan is too much in one step. When we swapped out our hardware for bigger and better, we stopped the Exchange Services and disabled them, rebooted, then performed a special tape backup. Took the (old) Exchange Server off of the network. Performed a tape restore onto a generic NT 4.0 build. Then, rebooted the (new) Exchange Server and performed an NT 4.0 install upon boot up. This way, we used all of the old files (even the operating system) and installed the different drivers as appropriate. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 01:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server Upgrade I am upgrading our current e-mail system hardware, for many many different reasons the new system has to have the same system name as the old system. This is usually not a problem, I just do it as a Disaster Recovery and restore exchange to the new H/W, however I am trying to through my own wrench into the equation this time. Current Config is: NT 4.0 w/sp6a Exch 5.5 w/sp4 Purposed new configuration: Win 2000svr (member) w/sp2 Exch 5.5 w/sp4 I have not been able to find any documentation on this, and didn't know if any of you had tried this. I am doing this getting ready for our AD conversion and would like all my member servers to be 2000 as prior to going to AD. I can't upgrade the current server to 2000 as it is a BDC (I know...not my choice). I know I could always do the new one as a NT4.0 member then do a OS upgrade, however I am very wary of doing OS upgrades, I prefer to have them done as fresh installs. TIA Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download?
Dear Paul, Back on Thursday, April 12, 2001, I wrote a Haiku memorializing Windows Messaging. Windows Messaging, more than a utility, powerful, simple. Able to resolve, Administrator's best friend, Never forgotten!! For those who need more, there is the following Q Article. Q254458 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 08:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? Don't have one (a Client directory). The CD is a Nov 98 MS Select Server CD. rgds Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 12:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? look in the client directory on your Exchange Server CD. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? I'd rather not put Outlook on a server, however I can't find the 32-bit Exchange Client for NT anywhere, Technet has plenty of updates but not the base installation. Can anyone provide a link, or a means of getting the file? Thanks in advance, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: relay
Dear Joshua, Exchange Admin Program Organization / Site / Configuration / Connections Internet Mail Service (ExchangeServer) Routing tab Routing Restrictions http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q196626 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 09:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: relay How do I prevent my server from being an open relay but still allow my internal machines use it as a smarthost? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Book Purchase - Tony Redmond
Dear DL Members, All I need is a part number and I am getting the book. What is the part number for Tony's book (see history below)? Publisher / ISBN Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bommelyn, Jeff R. Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 02:04 PM To: Garrish, Robert B. Subject: RE: Request - Book Purchase do you have a number of any kind part ref what ever... -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:15 PM To: Bommelyn, Jeff R. Subject: Request - Book Purchase Dear Jeff, I would like to order the following resource. It is a book. Let me know if you need any further information. Thanks. Microsoft Exchange Server for Windows 2000 by Tony Redmond Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steps toward Exchange Server 2000
Dear DL Members, I am not getting very far with my own research on this particular matter, and thought that I would run it past all of you. Wawa has four Exchange Servers, constituting one Exchange Site, in one NT Domain. I need to prepare the Exchange Servers for each of the following steps / phases. 01. Current Environment Two Domain Controllers PDC is NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a BDC is NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a Four Exchange Servers (stand alone servers) NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a Exchange Server 5.5 with SP 4 02. Domain Controllers From NT Server 4.0 to Windows 2000 Server 03. Exchange Servers From NT Server 4.0 to Windows 2000 Server 04. Exchange Servers From Exchange Server 5.5 to Exchange Server 2000 I am able to find documents (white papers) to describe the change (step) from 03 to 04, but I am not able to find anything about the changes from 01 to 02, or 02 to 03. In particular, my questions are: 05. Does the Domain Controller upgrade to Windows 2000 (02) impact the Exchange Servers at all? 06. Is the Active Directory Connector installed during 02? 07. If so, how does it impact Exchange 5.5? 08. How does upgrading the Exchange Servers to Windows 2000 impact Exchange 5.5? Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Dear Martin, It is the stuff that Wawa uses to make scrapple. Any left overs, we send to Ben and Jerry's. Do not ask me what they use them for. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 ৑zÇšä ±r鮬:.Ë› m隊[hyæ„ \z[,æ½¥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-iÙ¢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Dear Andy, Yes. After installing SP4, each of the four Servers were rebooted, then I ran Performance Optimizer, then rebooted. I may run Performance Optimizer again, after the reboot at 2:00 AM on Tuesday. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 01:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Have you run the Performance Optimizer? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Dear Martin, I was not clear enough. E-mail is flowing and being delivered. Users can access their mailboxes. I am not able to open a mailbox using the Exchange Admin Program from the fourth Exchange Server. I can open any mailbox, using the Exchange Admin Program, from any of the other three Exchange Servers, and it does not matter what Server is the Home Server for the mailbox. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 01:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Good answer!! If nobody can access anything, why wait until the middle of the night? Do it now! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Have you run the Performance Optimizer? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members, What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of Year 2001? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: inbox repair tool
Dear Sandeep, First of all, 51% or better of the members of this List Server believe that PST files are bad. So, you will probably receive a handful of flame messages. I, however, like PST files and see their purpose in business. I would copy the 2 GB PST file to another PC and then run SCANPST from that PC. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Dear Bob, Eric mentioned that he had 1300 users. I am wondering, How many NT Servers, or Total Servers?. How many Laptops and PCs? Wawa has one NT Server and one NT Workstation in each Store (525 Stores, and growing). The Server Farm at HQ has just over 90 NT Servers. We have 500 Laptop Users and 400 PC Users. The NT Servers are running NetShield 4.5, and are updated once a week. The Exchange Servers are running GroupShield 4.0.4 and are also updated once a week. I perform manual updates during virus alerts, but that is not a full time position. The Client configuration is part of the standard build (both Windows 95 and Windows 2000) for a weekly update. Once setup, what else needs to be done? What else warrants another full time employee? By the way, this is not a commercial for Network Associates. I recognize that other anti virus software applications are just as easily administrated. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 09:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I disagree. Personally I think if you are a large organization you should have at least 2 people solely dedicated to keeping up with AV. It's a tough job to always be on top, and would require constant attention. Someone should be in place to be able to send emails and warn others of the hazards of virii on the horizon. If you are in such a large organization and you can afford to hire someone, I suggest you do so. In fact, I would gladly leave my position to take on an AV position in your company for 65K a year, full med and dental benefits, 5 weeks vacation, a free to use mobile phone, and sodas and snacks provided in office. Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **Please note, if you do not understand what SARCASM is, please be assured the above is a wonderful example of such** -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting Permissions on Public Folders
Dear Pete, Use System Distribution Lists for administering the permissions on your Public Folders. Then it is a matter of SDL membership. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 09:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting Permissions on Public Folders Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of such, but never had a need to do so for public folders. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Alert - W32/Zoher@MM
Dear DL Members, Wawa received about six infected messages. NAI has an extra.dat for it. http://vil.nai.com/VIL/newly-discovered-viruses.asp http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99287 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook name not resolving
Dear Mike, The name should be resolved if you use the Directory Name or the Alias. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook name not resolving Good afternoon group, Happy Holidays OUTLOOK 98 NT 5.5 SP4 I have a mailbox name that does not resolve when it is typed in its completed name: Kelli Kappus When I key in Kell Kap or anything similar it resolves. The problem I see is the directory name is Kelly.Kappus We found out the real name was Kelli so we changed it on the general tab. Is this why the name does not resolve? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Preventing Hacks
Dear Desmond, Is hermes.metro.org an open relay? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 02:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Preventing Hacks A) Turn off the box. That always resolves file is inaccessible problems. B) Provide some actual detail on the list server, platform/OS/version/etc. C) Securing a specific software item is never a broad question, it's very specific. Find the resources that are dedicated to that software be it mailing list or newsgroup or vendor. -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Preventing Hacks I know this is a broad question but I just want a general overview. How would you go about securing a list server from outside malicious attacks. 'I'm almost certain that I found how they got in but the file is inaccessible because its in use. I need help, bad!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail boxes and GAL
Dear Raj, How about hiding the mailboxes, then inform the select users what the associated SMTP Address is. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 04:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail boxes and GAL Is it possible (in Exchange 5.5,sp4, Windows NT sp6) to create Mailbox accounts but keep them off GAL ? Hiding the Mailboxes will not do, as select users need to be able to send these accounts emails. Thanks for any help. Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Late delivery of mail
Dear Calvin, In Wawa's case, the properties of the NIC on the Exchange Server needed to be modified. Let me describe with more detail. From a mailbox on a different Exchange Server, I would send a test message to the mailbox on the problem Exchange Server. Using Windows Messaging on the problem Exchange Server, I could open the recipient mailbox and see that the message was in the Inbox. However, at the Client PC, Outlook did not show the new e-mail message in the Inbox. The NIC buffer on the problem Exchange Server did not reach its limit, thus the New Mail Notification was not sent to the Client PC. Before we modified the NIC buffer, the Client PC would have to click on another Outlook folder for the new message to come down to the Client PC. I do not think that modifying the NIC properties on the Client side will help you. I vaguely remember reading other Tech Net articles that were close to Wawa's situation, but not of help. They may help you. Perform a Tech Net search on the following words. UDP MTU Size New Mail Notification Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions'; 'Garrish, Robert B.' Subject: RE: Late delivery of mail Your answer might do the trick. Was the NIC on the server or the workstation. If it was on the server, I doubt that your answer is the one because it is a high volume server. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Late delivery of mail Dear Calvin, I had a similar problem over a year ago. The resolution here at Wawa was that my SA needed to adjust a setting on the NIC. Some buffer in the NIC needed to reach a top limit, before the NIC would interrupt the Processor, and thus return the New Mail Notification message. There were very few mailboxes on this Exchange Server at that time. Thus, not a lot of constant traffic. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 07:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Late delivery of mail Thank you for the suggestion of the FAQ. I looked up FAQ 3.24 as you suggested and found this: The push notification of new mail uses a dynamically assigned port in the range UDP 1024-UDP 65535. This is also controlled by the RPC Portmapper service. There is no known way to fix this port. The workstation and server are on the same network, (i.e. there is no firewall between them). Usually there is no delay in the notice of new mail, that is, the problem is intermittent. I have made another search of the knowledge base pertaining to high ports and Exchange and find nothing relating to delayed mail notification. Does anybody have any other leads that I might follow? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Late delivery of mail FAQ on new mail notification - Original Message - From: Smith, Calvin C [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: Late delivery of mail What could cause Outlook to not see new mail until several hours after the recorded receipt data? All the messages arrived in the inbox close to the same time. Some messages came in through the Internet Mail Service and some are internal to the Exchange site. All the messages show that the Sent date and the Received date are within a few minutes of each other. The Received date shows a time that is several hours before the message could be seen in the inbox with Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.3812. Server is running Exchange 5.5 SR4 on NT SR6a. The workstation running Outlook did not record any network outages. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: new virus out!
Dear Dave and Others, NAI knows about it and another new virus. http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99285 http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99286 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 03:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: new virus out! This one has not physically hit our servers yet, and we are blocking .exe anyways...but be on the lookout...This is copied from Trend's site: A new worm/virus has been reported in the wild named WORM_MALDAL.C. It propagates via email using Microsoft Outlook. The e-mail message will contain the following information: Subject: Happy New Year Message Body: Hii I can't describe my feelings But all i can say is Happy New Year :) Bye Attachment: CHRISTMAS.EXE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Dear Robert, Q254921 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q254921 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 04:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit 552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for? (This is a test message to an aol address) Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:TEST Sent: 12/18/01 3:08 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 12/18/01 3:30 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Blistex;l=BLISTEXEXC-011218212354Z-27729 MSEXCH:IMS:Blistex:BlistexInc:BLISTEXEXC 3552 (000B09AA) 552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pointer
Dear Louis, Search the archives on the Subject Line of Haiku on Windows Messaging. = Back on Thursday, April 12, 2001, I wrote a Haiku memorializing Windows Messaging. Windows Messaging, more than a utility, powerful, simple. Able to resolve, Administrator's best friend, Never forgotten!! For those who need more, there is the following Q Article. Q254458 = Rob Garrish (a k a scrapple boy) Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pointer Hi, does anyone have a link to the KB article on why it is a bad idea to install OL2000 on the exchange server? Ive mislaid mine and im having no luck finding it again. Ta. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URL as a malicious code.
Dear DL Members, Network Associates http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99284 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 02:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: URL as a malicius code. Bad... very bad... http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.asp?pid=36sid=1A2=ind0112L=ntbugtraqF=P S P=3038 ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Romero, Eric | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/18/2001 12:29 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: URL as a malicius code. | --- ---| Hi all Are you receiving emails with subjects www.celebxtr.cgb.net that creates url links in the desktop and start to send massive messages? Rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Early Virus Warning by Symantec - December 18. 2001
Dear DL Members, Network Associates http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99284 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 04:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Early Virus Warning by Symantec - December 18. 2001 Trend has a new pattern out since 05:00 EST this morning. New pattern number is 185. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Early Virus Warning by Symantec - December 18. 2001 http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/early.alert.for.an.unconfirmed.ne w.worm.html BE CAREFUL! Symantec Security Response is currently investigating reports of a mass mailing worm spreading via email. The email arrives with the following: Subject line: HI !! Body: http:// celebxx.cjb.net Hi. I found cool site. It's really cool. Symantec Security Response strongly suggests users not visit the Web site. Additionally, users should block access to celebxx.cjb.net to help protect themselves. The email message is not believed to contain an attachment. However, final determination is pending. It is also being reported that after accessing the Web site, the original email message was forwarded to everyone in their Microsoft global address book. Symantec Security Response has not received any submissions or samples yet. Additional information will be posted to the Symantec Secuirty Response Web site as soon as it is available. Darryl Harris AltaVista _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Dear DL Members, D S L at home I connected it last night Thank you Verizon Anxious to leave work So that I can get high speed Five P M come soon Bye Bye Fifty Six Welcome V P N et al Christmas came early I will tell you this, it is not easy to keep the 5 7 5 thing. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 09:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Exchange keeps humming Everything is damn groovy Livejournal awaits Denis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Late delivery of mail
Dear Calvin, I had a similar problem over a year ago. The resolution here at Wawa was that my SA needed to adjust a setting on the NIC. Some buffer in the NIC needed to reach a top limit, before the NIC would interrupt the Processor, and thus return the New Mail Notification message. There were very few mailboxes on this Exchange Server at that time. Thus, not a lot of constant traffic. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 07:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Late delivery of mail Thank you for the suggestion of the FAQ. I looked up FAQ 3.24 as you suggested and found this: The push notification of new mail uses a dynamically assigned port in the range UDP 1024-UDP 65535. This is also controlled by the RPC Portmapper service. There is no known way to fix this port. The workstation and server are on the same network, (i.e. there is no firewall between them). Usually there is no delay in the notice of new mail, that is, the problem is intermittent. I have made another search of the knowledge base pertaining to high ports and Exchange and find nothing relating to delayed mail notification. Does anybody have any other leads that I might follow? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Late delivery of mail FAQ on new mail notification - Original Message - From: Smith, Calvin C [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: Late delivery of mail What could cause Outlook to not see new mail until several hours after the recorded receipt data? All the messages arrived in the inbox close to the same time. Some messages came in through the Internet Mail Service and some are internal to the Exchange site. All the messages show that the Sent date and the Received date are within a few minutes of each other. The Received date shows a time that is several hours before the message could be seen in the inbox with Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.3812. Server is running Exchange 5.5 SR4 on NT SR6a. The workstation running Outlook did not record any network outages. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge
Dear Andy, How would you compare that to scrapple? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 08:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge m wrapped sausage links... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge watch the word wrap on that link! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2001 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=FH;EN-US;offer11AFR=0SD=GN; LN=EN-US Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2001 12:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge How much? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2001 11:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge With your wallett. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2001 12:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exmerge Dear group, Has anyone downloaded v3.71 or later version of Exmerge.exe from Microsoft web page before? The Technet article says I need to approach PSS but how? BY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q300048 MTA Event ID 57 on Bridgehead Servers
Dear DL Members, Has anyone made this change to their IMC Exchange Servers? Did it work for you? Did you change it to 8 or some other value? Not always, but when we receive Event 57, this normally results in . 01. The IMC Exchange Servers stops communicating with the other Exchange Servers (MTA). 02. I can successfully stop the Information Store Service, but I can not stop the MTA Service. NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a Exchange 5.5 with SP 3 Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 on Exchange 2000 Server
Dear Tony, Back on Thursday, April 12, 2001, I wrote a Haiku memorializing Windows Messaging. Windows Messaging, more than a utility, powerful, simple. Able to resolve, Administrator's best friend, Never forgotten!! For those who need more, there is the following Q Article. Q254458 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 03:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2000 on Exchange 2000 Server A while back I heard it was a no no to install Outlook 2000 on a 2000 server running GC and Exchange 2000. Was told it screwed up stuff. Does anybody no if this has been resolved or is this a old wifes tale. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Listers: Thanks for the help!
Dear Rick, Wawa knows and loves Pottstown. Store 48 Rt 724 Schuykill Rd Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bauer, Mr. Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 08:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Listers: Thanks for the help! A note of gratitude: We fixed a problem with our Exchange 2000 server 2 nights ago, and we did it without spending any additional money. We are a school that doesn't have a lot of cash to spend on incident calls to Redmond, and we would prefer to spend our money on our students and faculty. I got great information from the folks on the listserve, delivered with speed, accuracy, and it was a wonderful experience. I checked the FAQ before I posted, but still couldn't find the exact solution to my problem. To think what I would have had to pay to get this solution (or the horror in having to report to my community that the problem could not be fixed) still frightens me. We're not brilliant, but we're not idiots, either. I will gladly take the slings and sarcasms and witticisms (and occasional flashes of literary greatness--not you Martin--and concern) to wade into this source of knowledge and genuine (when you filter out all the posing and kvetching) professional pride in running a top-flight messaging operation for our companies. We know a bargain when we see one. So thanks, guys (oops, gals, too--Missy, I worship the ground you walk on!). We don't get out much, but if events ever bring you near Philly, please come by and we'll buy as many rounds as necessary to let you know how much we appreciate all the folks who contribute, who inform, and who challenge us to do better, be more proactive, be more self-managing and knowledgeable about these communication tools that so many depend on. Last time I checked, this wasn't a pay-for-play site, but it sure could be. Thanks again for all the help (okay, cue the music, grab the marshmallows, and let's all hold hands and sing Kumbaya). (shit, I knew I couldn't get this into a haiku for Friday) Rick Bauer The Hill School _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Level 1 category files
Dear DL Members, We are testing Outlook 2000 and the different e-mail security updates. Our Exchange Servers are NT 4.0 with SP6a and Exchange 5.5 with SP3. I have read some Tech Net articles which make me think that I, the Exchange Administrator, can change Level 1 files into Level 2 files, and that this task is performed on the Exchange Servers, not on the client side. Q262631 Q259228 Q259514 When the Outlook 2000 client is SR-1 9.0.0.3821, we are pleased with how it handles exe and com files. When the Outlook 2000 client is SR-1 9.0.0.5414, we are not pleased with how it handles exe and com files. Under Tools, Options, Security tab, we lost the Attachment Security button when we applied the 5414 patch. How can we get this back via GUI or Registry Setting? The only method that I read was to uninstall Office 2000 (not just Outlook, but all of Office, since that is how Outlook was installed), and then reinstall Office 2000, and then not apply the 5414 patch. How can I modify the official Level 1 and Level 2 file lists? If I could move files from the Level 1 list to the Level 2 list, this would meet our expectations. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
Dear Steven, Wawa uses NAI for both NetShield and GroupShield. To get to your issue, we have set up exclusions in NetShield Any drive letter:\exchsrvr\ and subfolders This works fine for us. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steven Plender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 09:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os We are currently using Antigen Anti-virus software on all of our Exchange servers. We have not used any other anti-virus software to protect the server or operating system itself. Three years ago when the Exchange systems were being installed it was known that file scanning anti-virus software could or would corrupt information store files and perhaps log files as well. The architect recommended that no anti-virus software be installed at that time. Desktops and other servers are protected with file scanning anti-virus software which is updated nightly. We have been asked / directed to install server file scanning software (NAI) on our Exchange servers. This weekend I have been running it in the lab on an Exchange server and have excluded the partition with the information store and the partition with the log files. Can you tell me what the consensus is on this issue and do you run server anti-virus software along with Exchange aware anti-virus software. Thanks. Steve Plender RBC DS __ Sent with PAWSoft MiniMail Download MiniMail for FREE now! http://www.pawsoft.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ims queues
Dear Richard, Host unreachable may mean that the other company's e-mail server is down. network error during host resolution may mean that your Exchange Server does not recognize the e-mail domain. In the Exchange Admin program, on the IMC, on the Connections tab, Message Delivery is set to use DNS. If this is correct, and there is no Internal MX Record for this particular e-mail domain (and there should not be), then you are at the mercy of your ISP's DNS. In this case, when you run nslookup, you ought to change your default Server. When you run nslookup, it uses information from your Internal DNS Server and then from your ISP's DNS Server. Somebody else's DNS Server may contain an MX Record for the e-mail domain your are attempting to send to. Then, contact your company's ISP, and inform them that a particular MX Record has not been propagated to their DNS Server. Let them see if there is something that they can do. For about a month and a half, I was unable to send posts to this list, because Wawa changed ISPs, and the new ISP had no idea (no MX Record) who @ls.swynk.com was. Oddly enough, no one from the list even noticed that I was not posting or replying. Go figure. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 09:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ims queues ok so I did a MX record lookup and it returned a SERVER: www.theircompany.com IP ADDRESS: 127.0.0.1 DNS: REQUEST TIMED OUT. REQUEST TIMED OUT FOR 2 SECONDS DNS REQUEST TO WWW.THEIRCOMPANY.COM TIMED OUT I also did a telnet to port 25 but it returned somthing like esmtp sendmail 8.9.1a/8.9.1: then the date at a specific time (met DST) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ims queues Start, Run, CMD, NSLookup, Set Type=MX, type in the domain name and see what you get. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ims queues Yes the outbound messages are the ones that seem to get stuck. I looked at details of the messages and most of them said (host unreachable) but there were two other ones that said (network error during host resolution). Im not sure what that means but I think its on their side. (hopefully) Also if you can let me know how to do a MX Record lookup. Is this just looking up a web site or do I do it through my dns. I thank you for your response and appreciate it so much. Thank you Richard Tener [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 7:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ims queues Richard, THERE IS NO NEED TO YELL. You haven't said with it is the inbound or outbound queue. I will assume outbound since it would be rare for inbound messages to be stuck. If you are not relaying to another server it is very common to have messages stuck in the outbound delivery queue. If you click on the Details button it will tell you why the message has not been delivered. The most common reason will be Host Unavailable or Host Undeliverable. That means that for any number of reasons your server could not initiate a TCP session with the recipients mailhost. If most of your messages are going through then there is a probably nothing wrong. Especially if the messages in question go after awhile. You can test a connection by doing an MX record lookup for the host in question and then initiate a telnet session to port 25 to that host from your Exchange server. If that fails, then your IMS will be unable to send the message. Scott. -Original Message- From: Richard Tener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ims queues Hello, I HAVE EXCHANGE SERVER 5.5 SP4 RUNNING ON WINDOWS NT 4.0 SP6. EVERYDAY I CHECK THE IMS QUEUES AND IT SHOWS SOME MESSAGES ARE STUCK IN THE QUEUES FOR A LONG TIME. THE MESSAGE WILL KEEP TRYING FOR SOMETIME BUT WILL STAY IN THERE FOR EVER. ALSO OTHER MESSAGES ARE GOING OUT AND WE ALSO RECEIVE ALOT OF MESSAGES WITH NO PROBLEM. I ALSO NOTICED THAT THERE IS ONE COMPANY THAT ALWAYS GET STUCK IN THE QUEUE. I DONT HAVE MESSAGE TRACKING ON BECAUSE I DONT KNOW HOW TO SET THAT UP. ALSO IF ITS THE OTHER COMPANYS SERVER PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHY IT WOULD BE THEIR SERVER. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. RICHARD TENER [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Disable ability to reply
Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to a System Distribution List, and prevent the recipients from being able to reply to the message they receive. I did not think that this was possible. I used the help in Outlook 2000 and performed a couple of searches in Tech Net on the Web. Our user community has both Outlook 97 and 2000, and we are Exchange 5.5 with SP3. Please help or point in the correct direction. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable ability to reply
Dear DL Members, We have presented a couple of alternate options, such as creating a generic mailbox to use to send the message from, so that any reply would not go to a mailbox belonging to a human being. We even mentioned Steve Hanna's idea of stating it at the beginning of the message, and at the end of the message!! We have restrictions set up on the SDLs. The concern is that the person from HR who needs to be the Original Sender does not want to get any replies at all. Thus, we are trying to figure out a way to prevent the recipients from being able to reply to the Original Sender. Thanks for all the replies. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disable ability to reply Are you wishing to keep them from replying to all, replying to the sender, or both? If you want to keep them from replying to all you can go about it a couple of ways. First, on the Delivery Restrictions tab of the System DL, only allow yourself (and any others necessary) to address mail to it. Second, you can address System DL messages using BCC. Finally - and this is what I would ALSO do (all 3), only send System DL messages from a specific mailbox - as in one designated for System messages, Corporate Communication, etc. Only allow that mailbox to address the System DL. Some of these are business policy issues. I believe just trying to limit replies to specific messages will cause you much more pain than doing it this way. Eric On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:21:33 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to a System Distribution List, and prevent the recipients from being able to reply to the message they receive. I did not think that this was possible. I used the help in Outlook 2000 and performed a couple of searches in Tech Net on the Web. Our user community has both Outlook 97 and 2000, and we are Exchange 5.5 with SP3. Please help or point in the correct direction. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: responding from an exchange group
Dear Luke, You have a couple of options. 01. When replying to one of these e-mail messages, have the 12 members add the From line to their new (compose) messages, and then enter the name of the SDL onto the From line. The weakness with this is that the Reply ends up in their own Sent Items folder. 02. Replace the SDL with one generic mailbox by the same Display Name and SMTP Address. Permit each of the 12 to open this new mailbox as an additional mailbox. This way, each of the 12 knows when someone else has opened a new message. It is no longer bold print. Teach them to Reply from the generic mailbox (see 01 above). 03. In the Exchange Admin program, go to the SDL, Permissions tab, add the 12 mailboxes, and give them send as permissions. Hope this helps. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 03:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: responding from an exchange group I am running windows 2k sp2 with Exchange 5.5 Enterprise sp3 what we currently have is a Techsupport group with about 12 members and whenever someone emails [EMAIL PROTECTED] all 12 get it, but when the techsupport engineer answers the question the client sees their SMTP address and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] it says they do not have permissions to send on behalf of this user how do I set permissions on an exchange group to be able to send emails on behalf thanks, Luke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
