RE: Backup
it sounds like you are backing up individual mailboxes, this is not a good idea, see the archives for why, is it also true that if you select the brick backup then you are unable to make incremental backups.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steck, Steffen M. Sent: 10 January 2002 07:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hi there, I am having probs with the backup of my XCNG 5.5 Sp4 on NT4Sp6. I have a priv.edb of approximately 23 GB size. Besides is only the OS and little more (antivirus etc) on the machine. The machine itself is a P3 Xeon with 500 Mhz and 512 MB RAM. It has an DLT 80 and uses backup software Veritas Backup Exec Multiserver 7.3. The problem: The backup of the Exchange Mailboxes lasts 12 hours, the whole filesystem (27 GB) is being taped in half an hour. Why does take so long to read out the mailboxes of the information store? Anybody seen this or any idea? Thx in advance Steffen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GWART
Are both your IMC's inbound and outbound or is 1 in and 1 out? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: 11 January 2002 21:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GWART I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon. What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow for IMS traffic? > -Original Message- > From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: GWART > > > I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem > is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other > bridgehead. I decided to look into the routing table to see > why this is. However, I decided it would be easier to review > the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and read > through it. I discovered that there is no entry for the new > site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. Does anyone > out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file? I > am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw > a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any > help would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Steps toward Exchange Server 2000
Here is what you do my friend. 1) forget about your weekend 2) browse to http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp 3) Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read. There is no easy way (other than to pay someone). Good luck. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert B. Sent: 11 January 2002 20:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Steps toward Exchange Server 2000 Dear DL Members, I am not getting very far with my own research on this particular matter, and thought that I would run it past all of you. Wawa has four Exchange Servers, constituting one Exchange Site, in one NT Domain. I need to prepare the Exchange Servers for each of the following steps / phases. 01. Current Environment Two Domain Controllers PDC is NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a BDC is NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a Four Exchange Servers (stand alone servers) NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a Exchange Server 5.5 with SP 4 02. Domain Controllers From NT Server 4.0 to Windows 2000 Server 03. Exchange Servers From NT Server 4.0 to Windows 2000 Server 04. Exchange Servers From Exchange Server 5.5 to Exchange Server 2000 I am able to find documents (white papers) to describe the change (step) from 03 to 04, but I am not able to find anything about the changes from 01 to 02, or 02 to 03. In particular, my questions are: 05. Does the Domain Controller upgrade to Windows 2000 (02) impact the Exchange Servers at all? 06. Is the Active Directory Connector installed during 02? 07. If so, how does it impact Exchange 5.5? 08. How does upgrading the Exchange Servers to Windows 2000 impact Exchange 5.5? Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS Maintenance
The view we have is "dont fix it if it isnt broken." Although, if you have recently migrated a lot of data off the server it may be worthwhile running ESEUTIL to defrag the database, daily IS maintenance should take care of defragmenting the databases though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chad Gibson Sent: 15 January 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS Maintenance What is the best practice for IS maintenance?? Do you have it run everyday, twice a week? Also do you switch the view to 15 minute and just add a block to the time you want IS maintenace to start?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS Maintenance
Apologies, misread the question, yes we run IS maintenance in the early hours every morning. Use whichever view you are comfortable with. G -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chad Gibson Sent: 15 January 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS Maintenance What is the best practice for IS maintenance?? Do you have it run everyday, twice a week? Also do you switch the view to 15 minute and just add a block to the time you want IS maintenace to start?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Domain Controller?
Q1 - http://www.swynk.com/friends/janssen/Articles/Install_DS_or_MS.asp#InstallOn DSOrMS Q2 - a GC is a Domain controller, but it also holds a replica of selected attributes from all objects in the forest. Have a look at the Microsoft site - Exchange section. Jam packed with answers to this type of question, I feel that if you are asking this type of question, then it will benefit you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Putley Sent: 15 January 2002 16:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Domain Controller? Hi Could someone clarify the arguements for and against making a E2000 server into a domain controller? Also, if an E2000 server was to become a 2nd Global Catalogue server, does that force my hand into making it a DC anyway? Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 & ISDN...
It's all here...(link may wrap) http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Love Sent: 21 January 2002 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 & ISDN... Just a quick one, we have an exchange 5.5. sp3 Server running on W2k sp2, just installed an ISND Ta, and are abou to configure the connetions tab in Exchange to use this. The ISP mentioned we would have to change or alter some setting to enable the exchange server to collect mail each time there is an internet connection ? Does anyone know how or what there on about ? TIA Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange to Notes Replication Problems
Exchange5.5 SP4 NT4 SP6a I have a problem where our Notes connector to a subsidiary is playing silly buggers. Mail delivery is fine in both directions but the daily scheduled dir sync at 01:30 does not seem to have the desired effect, some mailboxes were deleted recently from the exchange GAL but no changes are showing on the downstream notes address book. I have looked at the logs using connectivity admin and they do show that the sync. process starts at 01:30. TIA Gary _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forms administrator permissions
I would assume owner? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Condron Sent: 25 January 2002 09:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forms administrator permissions All, I have created an area on the forms administrator (EX5.5 sp4) called 'WCVA organisational forms' I have given myself owner permissions to this folder, this allows me to publish designed forms to this folder. However when I try to delete a test form >MS Outlook XP>tools>forms>choose form>advanced>delete the box is greyed out. I would be grateful if someone could point me in the right direction to which permissions control usage of this command. TIA Mark Condron ICT Officer Wales Council for Voluntary Action -- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. -- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically stated. -- Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH Telephone: 029 2043 1700 Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote exchange administration
Do you mean the Exchange Administrator program?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rama Arumugam Sent: 25 January 2002 16:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote exchange administration Can some one please tell me what/where is the name of the file that is in the exchange CD that allows you to administer (i.e. create mailboxes and stuff) exchange server from your NT box? Thanks everyone! rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS
Message size increases due to conversion...set the limit a little higher than your maximum message size. eg, for a 10Mb limit, set it to 14Mb -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester Sent: 24 January 2002 15:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS I'm having a extrange problem I'm running Exchange Server 5.5 service pack 4 I have a 2Mg limit set on the IMS.. some users are getting messages back with the error 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size limit I check the particular messages and they are way below the limit... If I send a 1.5Mg file..I get the same error message.. I have search Microsofts support site and I can't find anything on this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: event 7024 on is/ds consistency check
Have a look, and add this site to favs. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7024&source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon, Josh Sent: 25 January 2002 17:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: event 7024 on is/ds consistency check Is 7024 event an expected event on the IS/DS consistency check for unknown usernames on: system configuration Schedule + Free Busy Offline Address book OAB 2 It reads: Public Folder System Configuration does not have any Owners in its access control list. It's just an informational event, and it sounds like that would be right to me... but I didn't find the event listed on the MSKB and thought I would just see if anyone else knew for sure. Thanks, Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outhouse email
Check your IMS settings for allowing forwarding to the Internet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of louis Sent: 24 January 2002 21:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outhouse email Scenario: A rule specifies to forward all emails to an outside account, however only "inhouse," emails get forwarded. Mail from outside the organization does not get forwarded. How can we correct this problem??? Louis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Electronic forms designer
Dunno if this is any good to you. http://developer.grup.com.tr/misc/mapi/ch5.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Condron Sent: 24 January 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Electronic forms designer All, I have looked on the Internet, slipstick, help files etc. I cannot find a comprehensive source for the electronic forms designer within exchange 5.5. Does anyone know of a good resource/book on the electronic forms designer? I want to automatically add e-mailed forms to a database for monitoring enquiries, running queries etc. I also need to delete some incorrect organisational forms, but the 'delete' button under design form - advanced is greyed out I cannot find where the permissions are for this. I have also noticed that when using the Tab key when moving around the forms it moves around the forms in the order they were created not a logical downward left>right order. Any help much appreciated TIA Mark Condron ICT Manager Wales Council for Voluntary Action -- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. -- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically stated. -- Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH Telephone: 029 2043 1700 Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Profile Maker???
Whats wrong with good old profgenit's free too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: 25 January 2002 18:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Profile Maker??? Guys and Gals, Has anyone ever used a product called Profile Maker 6.1.8? Our Help Desk wants to save 15 minutes here and there and use this product. From a quick review, it looks like a total time wasting snafu and could possibly pose a few security problems. http://www.autoprof.com/ TIA for your responses, Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Norton AV installation
What does your manual say? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Boettcher, Keith Sent: 24 January 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Norton AV installation MS Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT Server 4.0 SP6 I want to install Norton Anti-Virus for Exchange on my Exchange Server. Should I do so while logged on as the MS-Exchange Service Account or should I not use that account for installation of NAV? Keith Boettcher San Joaquin Valley Library System Fresno, California Ph: 559-262-4859 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopped Relaying, but now internal LAN user has problem (Exch 5.5)
On the routing restrictions tab enter the IP address of the server/client which connects to the exchange IMS to deliver your newsletter. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of S Verne Sent: 24 January 2002 21:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stopped Relaying, but now internal LAN user has problem (Exch 5.5) I made the changes to my Exchange 5.5 (SP3) server to prevent it acting as a relay. It worked fine and passed the test. The problem is some software we use internally for sending our newsletter to customers. The software requires us to put in a mail server to send the mail through. When specifying our Exchange server, our Exchange server thinks we are trying to relay and stops the program from working. So, I need to know where to change in the Internet Mail Service to allow internal IPs (10.10.10.x) to relay and still prevent the outside world. I changed the following to prevent relaying: Routing tab has Reroute selected and our domain specified as Inbound. Routing Restrictions button has only "host and clients with these IP addresses" selected and no IPs entered. What would I change? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Norton AV installation
Does this do it for ya? (from Cambridge International Dictionary of English) manual (BOOK) noun [C] a book which gives you practical instructions on how to do something or how to use something, such as a machine He learned how to mend a leaking pipe by reading a DIY manual. The computer comes with a 600-page instruction manual. .. .. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: 25 January 2002 18:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Norton AV installation The what??? -Original Message- From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Norton AV installation What does your manual say? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Boettcher, Keith Sent: 24 January 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Norton AV installation MS Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT Server 4.0 SP6 I want to install Norton Anti-Virus for Exchange on my Exchange Server. Should I do so while logged on as the MS-Exchange Service Account or should I not use that account for installation of NAV? Keith Boettcher San Joaquin Valley Library System Fresno, California Ph: 559-262-4859 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations
cynic :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: 25 January 2002 20:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations What's the FAQ? Why u no answer my question! -Original Message- From: Boettcher, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations You are referring to the FAQ (indicated at the bottoms of these messages) Section 4.6, right? Keith Boettcher -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations LOL! Clearly you haven't been here as long as those of us who are now thoroughly jaded. Why do you think we revel in being sarcastic smartasses?!? At least it's a skill we can hone while typing out the same answers over and over again. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:[idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations I think once a week we need to post a list of links to the faq that answer: AV, Backup, moving a server, upgrading, and why not to run eseutil. Then we could have more time to answer real questions that don't get asked 3 times a day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus Suite recommendations You're not buying the product. You get a term license for its use. Same with Antigen. - Original Message - From: "Matt Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations > I'm noting that CDW does have the NeaTSuite package for 250 users > listed at > under $8000. This is certainly a bit cheaper than NAI's package, > however, what is Trend's licensing like? NAI wants you to re-license > every two years. How about Trend? Is it similar? Maybe I'll get > lucky and they only > want you to buy it ONCE? > > -Original Message- > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations > > > ...and they do have the funniest radio ads. > > I sympathize on your situation with NAI. We saw a similar price > increase from them while actually reducing the number of nodes. I > looked at it as a good excuse to get some good software, Antigen in > our case. > > -Peter > > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:50 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations > > > So far CDW has been pretty good to me. I've usually received product > from them within a couple days of submitting a PO to them. Again, not > necessarily the cheapest place around, but ease of ordering and > service are > still a big part of why I decide to purchase from them. > > -Original Message- > From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations > > > And they have gotten parts to me next day even when I ordered at 5. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations > > > CDW...Not exactly the low cost specialists, but they always have what > I am searching for on a moments notice. > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations > > > Most of the time, yes. The quotes I got for NAI's suite were > "supposedly" at a 42% discount, but wre still winding up at around $86 > a pop. That's far > too much for us to be paying. I've been told that using one set of > products > on the desktop and anotehr on the servers is a good idea, as one product > may > catch things that anothr does not. That seems like a sound idea. So, > maybe > my solution ought to be to look at Trend for the servers and keep things > simple for my users and stick with McAfee on the desktops (so they won't > freak out, which they so often do with anything "new"). BTW, where did > you > find that cost estimate? > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations > > > I found 150 Users, $4500 > >
RE: How do you send a recurring message
Yup -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: 25 January 2002 17:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How do you send a recurring message Does tasks send you a reminder each recurring time? -Original Message- From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How do you send a recurring message Why not use Tasks in outlook? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users lost email between certain dates
Any rules/views? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric Sent: 25 January 2002 20:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Users lost email between certain dates Sent items and some user created folders. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Users lost email between certain dates I can think of a number of user based causes, but very few system related ones. What folder are we talking about? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Users lost email between certain dates > > > Has anyone ever seen where users lost email in certain > folders in specific date range, they are saying they haven't > delete the messages. We have deleted retentation time set to > 15 days but non of these > messages show up. There are saying that it is a system > problem. But > in our event logs which get monitored daily shows no problems with the > information store. Can certain mailboxes become corrupt within a > store. > > The server is running Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange 2000 SP1, we > have one store informational store on this server. > > Eric Sabo > NT Administrator > Computing Services Center > California University of Pennsylvania > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Profile Maker???
We have to keep certain e-mails for a period of 75 yearsyes, I guess so you can jail all your long deceased 100+ year old staff when the FBI/IRS/CIA/whoever audits your archive :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: 25 January 2002 20:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Profile Maker??? True. But several things come into play with my complaint: 1. We don't use "user share areas" or roaming profiles. 2. We do use .pst files (I know, I know...PST=BAD, but for regulatory purposes, we have to keep certain e-mails for a period of 75 years.). These PST files are all over the network on group shares, instead of in one central repository. 3. From what I gathered from a quick read of Profile Maker, it doesn't cover anything about adding a PST file location to the profile does it? I KNOW I'm being an idiot here, but what other functionality do you lose, using OWA vs. Outlook? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Profile Maker??? Because OWA <> Outlook. > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Profile Maker??? > > > See...now this was one of my gripes with having to use this product. > > If a user can walk up to any computer in the company, logon, > then double-click the link on the desktop to the OWA, why go > thru the hassle of setting up a third-party product to create > profiles on the fly? > > My $.02. > > -Original Message- > From: Desjardins, Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Profile Maker??? > > > We use it in our lab environment. We are using an > older version, but it has worked well for us. Also use it > where there are many users of a single computer. Creates > profiles on the fly and has been very useful for us. > > Ray Desjardins MCSE NT4.0/Win2k > Manager of Systems Services > Bridgewater State College > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Profile Maker??? > > > Guys and Gals, > > Has anyone ever used a product called Profile Maker 6.1.8? > Our Help Desk wants to save 15 minutes here and there and use > this product. From a quick review, it looks like a total time > wasting snafu and could possibly pose a few security problems. > http://www.autoprof.com/ TIA for your responses, Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: View Internet Headers
Someone once said... "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fred Sent: 25 January 2002 21:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: View Internet Headers Anyone know how I can view the internet header in a message without having to go to view options, in any version of outlook? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: View Internet Headers
Ok Tom, when you remove your face from the monitor and manage to sit yourself back down, count up how much time you save by pressing your imaginary "toggle" button as opposed to right clicking and selecting options on a message. I guess it gives you so much more time to do stuff am I right. If you want it stop writing 5 line replies and use the time to write yourself some code and design a custom custom form with your "toggle" button on. Anyone who has as much experience with UNIX mailers as you shouldn't have a problem. I am not disagreeing that it would be a good idea, I just cannot see what heartache a single click and press is? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: 25 January 2002 21:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: View Internet Headers Wanting to quickly view Internet headers is a behavioral problem? Puhleez. It's a feature that should be available by toggle. They have a toggle on the preview pane for "header information", after all, don't they? They give me all this RTF and HTML and vCard and background stationery crap, and I have a behavioral problem if I want a basic feature that has been available in every mail client since ELM? Get off it. What's next? Forcing you to send to only people listed in the address book, and if you want a one-time shot to [EMAIL PROTECTED] you have to go put him into contacts before you can send it? Same thing, in my eyes. > -Original Message- > From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, January 25, 2002 03:15 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: View Internet Headers > Subject: RE: View Internet Headers > > > Someone once said... > > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral > problems." > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fred > Sent: 25 January 2002 21:10 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: View Internet Headers > > > Anyone know how I can view the internet header in a message > without having > to go to view options, in any version of outlook? > Thanks > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: View Internet Headers
Ben, You win a cigar my friend. I shall be copying and pasting that post for future reference (unless you are claiming intellectual property rights) ;-) Thank crunchie its Friday -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: 25 January 2002 21:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: View Internet Headers It means that the solutions based in some form of technology, that exist to correct problems that are essentially caused by the behavior of one or more persons, are rarely satisfactory. Put more simply: It's easier to stop sticking a fork in your ear than it is to try and construct some kind of electro-magnetic hat. In the context of your question I can only assume that the original respondant was intimating that View | Options (or right-click | Options) is already very nearly as simple a solution as there can be, thus any attempts to improve upon it are likely just academic exercise. But I could be mistaken. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: View Internet Headers > > > > What is this suppose to mean? > > > Someone once said... > > > > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral > > problems." > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fred > > Sent: 25 January 2002 21:10 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: View Internet Headers > > > > > > Anyone know how I can view the internet header in a message without > > having to go to view options, in any version of outlook? Thanks > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Upgrade
You CANNOT upgrade to E2K without AD. AD is the DS for E2K. You CAN run E2K in "mixed mode" (a combination of W2k and NT4 DC's). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Sent: 25 January 2002 23:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Upgrade Upgrade process to Exchange 2000. What is the best path for us to take in the upgrade. Can we upgrade to Exchange 2000 and leave it on NT 4.? Than upgrade to active directory when necessary. We would like the added features of Exchange 2000 but our IT Manager doesn't want to upgrade the domain to 2000 unless absolutely necessary. thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: distribution list not working
Any NRs's we can see? Exc version O/S version, more info. please. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: 26 January 2002 00:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: distribution list not working Hi All, I've just discovered that I cannot get email to one of my distribution lists even though others work !?! I've checked everything I can think of but exchange rejects mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but doesn't say why. I've compared the group to other groups that work and it looks fine. Internally email is forwarded to the group. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - "Guaranteed B2B Purchases" _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange to Notes Replication Problems
Glad I sorted this.obviously no-one else employs the Notes connector...damn table files... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: 25 January 2002 17:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange to Notes Replication Problems Exchange5.5 SP4 NT4 SP6a I have a problem where our Notes connector to a subsidiary is playing silly buggers. Mail delivery is fine in both directions but the daily scheduled dir sync at 01:30 does not seem to have the desired effect, some mailboxes were deleted recently from the exchange GAL but no changes are showing on the downstream notes address book. I have looked at the logs using connectivity admin and they do show that the sync. process starts at 01:30. TIA Gary _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Access Violation
Can you please supply information describing the error (event log entries etc). You changed the service account...more info please. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of GJ Sent: 31 January 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: IMC Access Violation My exchange 5.5(SP3) IMS will not start with access violation. I've changed the service account, removed and reinstalled IMS all in vain. Any information on day-to-day exchange maintenance please? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Connector: not updating -- please offer advice
Q165914, hope that does it for ya. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DEBYSINGH Bruce Sent: 31 January 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Connector: not updating -- please offer advice Hello All, I am having difficulties with the Schedule + Free/Busy Connector. If any of you are familiar with this particular issue or can point me to a particular resource, it would be greatly appreciated. Please note that I have checked the list archive, but did not find any resolution. I am new to this Exchange organization, so I am still trying to understand the layout of the system. Problem: In this multi-site (9 sites) Exchange 5.5 (SP4) organization, the free/busy (f/b) information is not being updated. For example, some users only see a shaded area (hash marks) when they look at others f/b, while others may see f/b data up to a specific date followed by these hash marks for the rest of the calendar. --- I hope this is making sense. This behavior is occurring both inter-site and intra-site. What I have tries: - Update free/busy info. by creating new meeting requests - no change - Run /cleanfreebusy option at the client - no change What Next: Call PSS - they have not been very helpful in the past regarding free/busy connector issues Use the MDBVUE utility to clean out and f/b data (first site issues) Environment Configuration: EX5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6a Site Connectors MS - Mail Connectors (not sure if these are still valid) GroupWise Connectors Free/Busy Connector - age limits set to default (100) Thanks, Bruce _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Autoforwarding Rules.
why not use the 1st rule to forward on to the other mailbox instead of to another folder? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: 04 February 2002 21:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Autoforwarding Rules. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5. I have a user who has a rule setup to deliver specific mail to a particular folder. The question is, can another rule be setup to automatically forward any mail coming into this folder only, to be forwarded to another user? This user says that somebody else had it setup, but I can't find a rule like that anywhere. The only rules I see are ones to deliver mail to a particular folder, not to automatically forward mail onto another user. The alternate recipient thing won't work because then ALL the users E-mail would be forwarded, not just mail from the specified folder. Has anybody else done this? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need to export Ex Org info
exmap -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 08 February 2002 20:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need to export Ex Org info Sorry if this is a repeat post, I tried using the web based tool and I don't think it worked. I am looking for a quick way to export Org information...Org, Sites, and servers to start with and more granular later if possible. I have multiple Orgs with hundreds of Sites and Servers and want to document everything before I proceed with a full blown application assessment before we migrate to Ex2k. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Logfiles
troll.com by the sounds of it... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 28 February 2002 22:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Logfiles May I ask what company this is? - Original Message - From: "NetStar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:02 PM Subject: RE: Logfiles > Exactly, We are in process of planning for E2k with a > test lab setup. This is why I am joining this list. > --- "Webb, Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm also partial to Jim McBee's book in addition to > > Paul's. Scott Schnoll's > > book also deserves a plug, but I'm not sure how many > > 1000 page tomes anyone > > can get through. There are likely little subtleties > > of each that make them > > all valuable to have on the bookshelf for handy > > reference. > > > > > === > > Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.swinc.com > > Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX > > 512-322-0071 > > -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 > > -- > > > === > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Chenault > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:46 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Logfiles > > > > > > Yes. > > > > May I suggest any book appropraite to your version > > written by Tony Redmond > > or Paul Robichaux. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Mike Tonazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:17 PM > > Subject: AW: Logfiles > > > > > > Right now it's a test server that's coming > > productive. We will back it > > up with BackupExec Exchange Agent. If I understand > > you right: The > > logfiles will be commited and deleted as soon as we > > back it up - and > > Exchange will understand that we are backing it up? > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Martin Blackstone > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2002 20:50 > > An: Exchange Discussions > > Betreff: RE: Logfiles > > > > > > Those are the logfiles. Do not delete them. You need > > to run an Exchange > > aware backup program. That will commit the logs and > > then flush them > > after > > the backup. > > > > What are you using now to backup, and is it Exchange > > aware? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tonazzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:08 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Logfiles > > > > > > I have a Xchange2000 Server running on a W2K Server > > SP2. > > > > I have found in the program folder under .\MDBDATA > > dozens of logfiles > > named > > Exx.log. They use a huge amount of my Disk. I > > cannot find any > > explanaiton for these logfiles in MS's > > knowledgebase. What are they for > > and > > how can I remove them or make them smaller? > > > > Thanks for any help > > Mike > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! > http://greetings.yahoo.com > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe:
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Are you running win2k adv srvr with >= 1Gb RAM? Are you using /3GB switch in boot.ini? XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of Physical RAM (Q266096) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: 24 June 2002 20:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an "auto reply" for our HR dept to use when they receive "resumes" from outside the company. I've setup the "out of office reply" which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD field "forwardingAddress"
As in forwarding address for a mail enabled contact? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 25 June 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD field "forwardingAddress" Just wondering if this field could be used for any practical reasons in Exchange _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and Active Directory Native Mode
Here's another. The ADC replicates all Exch5.5 DLs to the AD as universal distribution groups (UDG's), these can exist in either a mixed or native mode AD. But, if you plan to use the E2K equivalent DL object for access to PF's, E2K will need to convert the UDG to a Universal Security Group (USG) because a UDG is not a security principal for ACL'ing PF's etc. USGs can only exist in Native-mode domains. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew Woodworth Sent: 27 June 2002 14:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Active Directory Native Mode I have an Exchange 5.5 server in a Windows 2000 Active Directory running in mixed mode. I've been trying to determine the impact of switching AD to "Native" mode instead of "Mixed" mode. Anyone know if it is OK to switch to Native Mode, or are there issues I need to be concerned about? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: After mailbox move from 5.5 to 2k Administrators can't open users mailboxes?
That depends what you used to migrate the mailbox, one migration tool may retain more or less information than another e.g. permissions, calendar, contacts, alternate recipient etc. etc. To add new permissions you will need to open the ad users and computers snap in, ensure view\advanced features is selected, find the w2k user object, right click it, select properties, i think its under the exchange advanced tab, then mailbox rights, someone correct me if i am wrong please, i cant remember, its late, i'm tired and i've ran out of bud. goodnight! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Brown Sent: 27 June 2002 18:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: After mailbox move from 5.5 to 2k Administrators can't open users mailboxes? Shouldn't these permissions remain after a mailbox move? If not, where do I setup the new permissions for access? Thanks, Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2nd Exchange server
It all depends on what spec. the server is. If the server is low spec. and you are experiencing performance problems then by all means build a new server on nice new hardware, follow william's instructions and then move mailboxes, if you intend decommisioning the old server and it is the first server in the site be sure to follow the steps in this article - Q152959. GOOD LUCK !! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Smith Sent: 13 July 2002 04:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 2nd Exchange server I have inherited a 2000 users Exchange 5.5 / NT4 server. I think it makes sense to set up a 2nd server for any new user mailboxes and / or move some existing user mailboxes to the new server as well. Is this a daunting undertaking? Does it makes sense? Thanks from a newbie! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
