RE: Recurring Calendar Error
Get the outlook autoaccept script from www.exchangecode.com and lose the accounts for the resource mailboxes. Follow the instructions for setting the permissions correctly for the mailboxes and you will not have any problems in setting up recurring meeting requests. Just make sure that the users are inviting the conference room as a resource and not a mandatory or optional attendee. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Nikki, Let me take a look. I haven't logged in under that account in quite some time. I'll let you know. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error Wild guess here, the client acting as a resource, has the Outlook options set to AUTOMATICALLY DECLINE RECURRING MEETING REQUESTS? Look in calendar options for resources. Nikki Bowles, John L. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] All, What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't ask me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a recurring meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the error of: The Conference Room declined your meeting because it's recurring. You must book each meeting separately with this resource. Does anyone have any idea why I can't book a recurring meeting? The user who is trying to do this has Full Access to this mailbox. TIA, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recurring Calendar Error
Don't know on that one. We have mailboxes for our resources, but no longer have accounts specifically for the mailboxes. Using the autoaccept scripts works very nicely for us. If you already have the mailboxes, you might as well use them. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error What about just removing them as accounts and mailboxes all together and just make it a calendar item as a public folder? They'd still have the same functionality correct? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Get the outlook autoaccept script from www.exchangecode.com and lose the accounts for the resource mailboxes. Follow the instructions for setting the permissions correctly for the mailboxes and you will not have any problems in setting up recurring meeting requests. Just make sure that the users are inviting the conference room as a resource and not a mandatory or optional attendee. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Nikki, Let me take a look. I haven't logged in under that account in quite some time. I'll let you know. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error Wild guess here, the client acting as a resource, has the Outlook options set to AUTOMATICALLY DECLINE RECURRING MEETING REQUESTS? Look in calendar options for resources. Nikki Bowles, John L. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] All, What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't ask me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a recurring meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the error of: The Conference Room declined your meeting because it's recurring. You must book each meeting separately with this resource. Does anyone have any idea why I can't book a recurring meeting? The user who is trying to do this has Full Access to this mailbox. TIA, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Sent Item
I think the whole point is to keep from having to do unnecessary restores. Would you want to restore, say, an email that contained a joke? It's a way of getting a user to examine their priorities - how important is the email. Is it important company data that needs to be recovered, or is it just convenience. I certainly wouldn't be willing to restore an exchange backup unless the customer/user can justify the worth of the email as being critical or necessary business data. I'm not saying that we would charge our users' cost centers for restores (we don't) - but then again, we also have deleted items retention set at 30 days so that we don't have to worry about this kind of thing. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator
RE: Sent Item
Unfortunately . . . VBG James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Backups are done primarily for business continuance. They are not done because someone's too stupid to think twice before deleting a 50mb spreadsheet without making sure that its not needed anymore. If our job was to pick up after morons all day long, we'd never get anything done. Although, our company doesn't do chargebacks for IT at this point, though. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item
RE: Sent Item
1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Working Offline
1) yes, they have to mark that folder as being synchronized/made available offline. Even if you designate all folders to be made available offline, you will have to go in and modify that synchronization group whenever new folders or subfolders are created. 2) no, you will not have access to other users' folders when working offline, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to other users' folders, they will have to work online. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline ...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround thanks -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to mark that folder to be synchronized? Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in synchronization Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Working Offline
If they are connected using ADSL (how fast?) there is no reason why they can't continue to work online. My office currently does not have enough user to warrant an exchange server, so we connect remotely to our corp HQ. We are connecting over a 384K pipe, and we all work online. Even if the DSL line is only a 768K line, there should be no issues with your users working online if they want to. If you have enough users in the remote offices to be concerned about the bandwidth, then perhaps the idea of having a centralized exchange server should be rethought. We have about 20 users in this office, though, and there are no significant performance issues with outlook and exchange. I recommend forgetting the PF idea with calendars and let those users who need to open other users' calendars just work online. I really don't think they will see a performance hit, and if so, it should be minimal. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline Ok thanks, we have remote sites that used to have local exchange servers, and they worked online. We've now moved all mailboxes to our central server, seperated from our remote offices via ADSL, and remote users now work offline, with automatic synchs every 10 mins. They basically open each others calenders, so I'm thinking we could achieve the same by them using public folders instead -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: 01 November 2002 14:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline 1) yes, they have to mark that folder as being synchronized/made available offline. Even if you designate all folders to be made available offline, you will have to go in and modify that synchronization group whenever new folders or subfolders are created. 2) no, you will not have access to other users' folders when working offline, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to other users' folders, they will have to work online. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline ...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround thanks -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to mark that folder to be synchronized? Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in synchronization Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Working Offline
So if you, say, have 20 users in a remote office, using a high estimate, they would need a total of 160K for outlook. In that scenario, why bother with offline folders and forcing users to synchronize? Even our remote dialup users still use outlook online for the added functionality. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Working Offline This issue has come up a few times regarding bandwidth needed for Outlook. Seems most here agree 4K range per user. I have seen some say as high as 8K though. - Original Message - From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Working Offline If they are connected using ADSL (how fast?) there is no reason why they can't continue to work online. My office currently does not have enough user to warrant an exchange server, so we connect remotely to our corp HQ. We are connecting over a 384K pipe, and we all work online. Even if the DSL line is only a 768K line, there should be no issues with your users working online if they want to. If you have enough users in the remote offices to be concerned about the bandwidth, then perhaps the idea of having a centralized exchange server should be rethought. We have about 20 users in this office, though, and there are no significant performance issues with outlook and exchange. I recommend forgetting the PF idea with calendars and let those users who need to open other users' calendars just work online. I really don't think they will see a performance hit, and if so, it should be minimal. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline Ok thanks, we have remote sites that used to have local exchange servers, and they worked online. We've now moved all mailboxes to our central server, seperated from our remote offices via ADSL, and remote users now work offline, with automatic synchs every 10 mins. They basically open each others calenders, so I'm thinking we could achieve the same by them using public folders instead -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: 01 November 2002 14:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline 1) yes, they have to mark that folder as being synchronized/made available offline. Even if you designate all folders to be made available offline, you will have to go in and modify that synchronization group whenever new folders or subfolders are created. 2) no, you will not have access to other users' folders when working offline, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to other users' folders, they will have to work online. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline ...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround thanks -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to mark that folder to be synchronized? Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in synchronization Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
Latest service pack in Office 2000? Affected users possibly using Word as their email editor? I don't remember seeing either of these 2 things being mentioned, although I could be wrong . . . James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hopefully Andy will see this too Ok I have checked the machines in Question... 1. CPU jumps pretty High and stays there when doing anything in Outlook related 2. This problem seems to be just with a few people and not everyone 3. There is no Excessive Memory usage and besides what I mention above CPU seems ok 4. I have set all Nics to be 100/full on both the server and workstations 5. I have turned off Virus Scanner 6. I have Defragged Hard Drives 7. I have Sacrificed a Chicken to appease the Gods (I was unable to find a Virgin) I'm just not sure what else to look at End Users who have the problem are running Windows XP Pro with Office 2000, but so is everyone else. Any other Ideas? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone What have you done to fix it? What's changed lately? Has it always done this? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an e-mail without an attachment. Currently everyone is running Windows XP and Office 2000 Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 Its got me stumped because some people do not have any problems... Any Help Appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Senior Network Engineer Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Cell: (864) 449-9912 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info The greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fall. -- Confucius _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting up two profiles
This will have to be done on both PC's, as well, and if he wants to see the same email on both PC's for his mistrel mail (assuming it is POP3 here), he will need to specify that it doesn't remove the mail from the server for x amount of days, or until he deletes them from his deleted items folder. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Setting up two profiles Right-click on the Outlook Mail icon on the Desktop. Choose properties, the go to profiles. Make the new profile, making sure the name resolves against the Exchange Server and then click the box down below the profiles that says Prompt for a profile. In this matter, he will be able to choose which one he wants. Or show him how open the other mailbox inside his own. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:eve_12uk;yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting up two profiles I run exchange server 5.5 with outlook 2000 as client. However one of our new bosses wants to be able to view his mistrel mail Account in outlook 2000. This mails has to go to a different location from his default mailbox. That he wants two profiles one for mistrel mails account which is private and his usual mailbox in the organisation. I thought of configuring outlook express but he wants to be able to view the mails from his machine in the office and also on a networked laptop in his flat in the same building. Using outlook and not the browser. With exchange this is no problem but I am not sure how to make this possible for mistrel account. Any suggestions on how to configure outlook 2000 to support two profiles. The usual default account for the organisation and one for mistrel. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
How about doing a repair of office, or uninstalling and reinstalling? Also see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q241425 And http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q255259 For starters . . . James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone I deleted the Profiles and set up new ones and the problem is still there Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone How about recreating the Outlook profiles in question? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hopefully Andy will see this too Ok I have checked the machines in Question... 1. CPU jumps pretty High and stays there when doing anything in Outlook related 2. This problem seems to be just with a few people and not everyone 3. There is no Excessive Memory usage and besides what I mention above CPU seems ok 4. I have set all Nics to be 100/full on both the server and workstations 5. I have turned off Virus Scanner 6. I have Defragged Hard Drives 7. I have Sacrificed a Chicken to appease the Gods (I was unable to find a Virgin) I'm just not sure what else to look at End Users who have the problem are running Windows XP Pro with Office 2000, but so is everyone else. Any other Ideas? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone What have you done to fix it? What's changed lately? Has it always done this? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an e-mail without an attachment. Currently everyone is running Windows XP and Office 2000 Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 Its got me stumped because some people do not have any problems... Any Help Appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Senior Network Engineer Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Cell: (864) 449-9912 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info The greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fall. -- Confucius _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
Have you checked to verify that the clients are resolving the addresses they type in? Ctrl+K? I have seen this happen (granted with Ex5.5, but with OL2k) when the client has multiple versions of the GAL in their OL Address Book and OL can't resolve the email address, so it hangs for about 5 minutes. Worth checking. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal;akbank.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, WMS spooler not reponding. Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
Any errors in the client event logs or on the exchange event logs? James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal;akbank.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button On the server side it is win2k sp2 and exchange2k sp3. on the client, it is olk2k sp2. 1. They are all on the same subnet connected to the same switch. just abt 30 users. Overloading can be ruled out. 2. They are all pentium III/VI machines with loads of memory and disk space 3. Will be reinstalling the outlook and see if it solves the problem. 4. There is no user error. Even if they pick up somebody from the address book and send it internally thye are getting this error. Will look in to any fixes for the office 2000 post sp2 fixes. The clients are able to resolve the names with CTRL K. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button EX2k... on Win2k server... what sp levels? What have you done to troubleshoot the clients, i.e. network connectivity, hardware, software. 1. Are they all on the same hub/segment/etc, possibly overused/failing? 2. Do the client pc's have enough resources (i.e. these are older/crappier than the others that work) 3. Have you re-installed outlook on these clients? 4. Have you ruled out all user error? etc -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal;akbank.nl] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Outlook Rules Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, WMS spooler not reponding. Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This inbound message from KPN has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit: http://www.veiliginternet.nl _ Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable
RE: Word as Email editor OutlookExpress
LOL! I don't know why, but that just seemed insanely funny to me today . . . Maybe lack of sleep? I gotta agree tho, I have yet to see a stable email environment with word as the email editor (although I think OXP is a *little* better). Just fuhgetaboutit. If you want a *real* mail client with lots of configurable options, including (at your own risk) Word as an email editor, then move to outlook. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Word as Email editor OutlookExpress Sure. I believe that is the standard configuration in Hell. -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:MicrosoftExchangeListServer;csi.exch.cgnet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Word as Email editor OutlookExpress Hi all Do we have anyway to configure OutlookExpress to use MicrosoftWord as email editor? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player
Here's a better idea: get the patch from MS that fixes the vulnerability - see Q290108. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player As you will notice the virus only opens on windows media player 7. To stop the html imbedded code from opening windows media player you can do two things. 1. go to internet options and put your security on high. 2. you can go to windows media player 7 options then go to extensions tab and disable windows media player from opening all extensions. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player try the virus removal tool on his PC !!! -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player Hi all My boss was asking a question I'm not too sure about. If the virus is being stripped, how is it able to open Windows Media Player?? I can't seem to find an answer with either McAfee or Symantec. Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to send emails as another ....
We have AMS notifications if any managed client on our AV server gets infected with a virus, and it doesn't even require that to send me notifications . . . 10 bucks says the Exchange Admin slaps him around and says fuhget about it! Not on MY exchange server . . . No way, now how, not ever. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another Unless it is AV or backup. Or something like that -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another Then use MS SMTP Server. Use something like CDONTS to create an email and send it that way. There is no excuse for a product to need that kind of access to an Exchange server. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another Depending on why your doing this/how. If you are writing an application the user does some action to send this e-mail. Which I hope is why your sending e-mails on behalf of someone else. Use the ShellExecute shell32.dll which will call the default e-mail program. From there you can have it fill in all the necessary info. Subject, body, attachment. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another If this is for an application, I hope you've got very strong management/legal support for what you're doing. Your users probably won't like the idea of some automated process sending out emails impersonating them. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another If you are developing an Outlook application, then I have two pieces of advice for you. 1. Discard anything Tener says out of hand and 2. Go join the Outlook Developers list on slipstick.com -Original Message- From: Culebro, Enrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another Rich: Thanks for your input, I'll try this with my Exchange Admins Thanks again Enrique -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another if it was me i would go to the exchange admin and open that users mailbox and then give myself permissions to send as. Also you might have to wait 45 mins for it to take effect. Rich -Original Message- From: Culebro, Enrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to send emails as another Hello everyone: I need to send emails as another (not on behalf of) from my personal Outlook account, is this possible?. Also, the other person should not be accessible when users create an email. Thanks for your help... Enrique _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
RE: WORM_KLEZ.G
It's not supposed to do that! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G CDW has the lowest prices! Promotional magic 8-balls. man. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G You refer to your virus software as him and you think that he talks to you? Now take your Magic 8-Ball and shake it up again and let's see what is tells us. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:01 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: WORM_KLEZ.G Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Thats the virus softwares job we pay him good money to do this. He told me that no one is infected. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Why you no answer my question?? Quack! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Dont you get paid to find out if anyone is infected or not? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I dont know if I anyone is infected or not we just keep receiving a ton of emails with viruses in them. -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen that happen here too. We block the files and antigen catches it but the media player/real player does start. Nothing bad happens after that which is a good thing. Sandhya -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I'm afraid you've gone and mystified me. If you're blocking all those filetypes, how can Klez get through to open Windows Media Player? -Peter -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G how do you stop it from opening windows media player even if i am blocking scr exe pif bat vbs js and com. I am using scanmail for exchange verson 3.52 -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen some klez-g messages with bat and scr attachments. Of course there may be disagreement on exactly what constitutes the G variant. -Peter -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If I am reading this article correctly, then it will have a random extension if it is a earlier variation of KLEZ. This particular version has either .exe or a double extension. Please correct me if I'm wrong. http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.html?id=4292 Jessica -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I was under the impression that the extension is random. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Block .exe -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WORM_KLEZ.G DOES ANYONE KNOW OF THE BEST WAY TO BLOCK THIS VIRUS WORM_KLEZ.G RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged
RE: WORM_KLEZ.G
It's a beta, what did you expect? James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It worked when I did it -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It's not supposed to do that! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G CDW has the lowest prices! Promotional magic 8-balls. man. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G You refer to your virus software as him and you think that he talks to you? Now take your Magic 8-Ball and shake it up again and let's see what is tells us. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:01 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: WORM_KLEZ.G Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Thats the virus softwares job we pay him good money to do this. He told me that no one is infected. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Why you no answer my question?? Quack! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Dont you get paid to find out if anyone is infected or not? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I dont know if I anyone is infected or not we just keep receiving a ton of emails with viruses in them. -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen that happen here too. We block the files and antigen catches it but the media player/real player does start. Nothing bad happens after that which is a good thing. Sandhya -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I'm afraid you've gone and mystified me. If you're blocking all those filetypes, how can Klez get through to open Windows Media Player? -Peter -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G how do you stop it from opening windows media player even if i am blocking scr exe pif bat vbs js and com. I am using scanmail for exchange verson 3.52 -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen some klez-g messages with bat and scr attachments. Of course there may be disagreement on exactly what constitutes the G variant. -Peter -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If I am reading this article correctly, then it will have a random extension if it is a earlier variation of KLEZ. This particular version has either .exe or a double extension. Please correct me if I'm wrong. http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.html?id=4292 Jessica -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I was under the impression that the extension is random. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Block .exe -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WORM_KLEZ.G DOES ANYONE KNOW OF THE BEST WAY TO BLOCK THIS VIRUS WORM_KLEZ.G RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: WORM_KLEZ.G
tastes like . . . Burning - courtesy of Ralph on the Simpsons (Lord of the Flies spoofing episode) And one of my favorites: I want to go to Bovine University - also courtesy of Ralph. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It burns when I pee -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It worked when I did it -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It's not supposed to do that! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G CDW has the lowest prices! Promotional magic 8-balls. man. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G You refer to your virus software as him and you think that he talks to you? Now take your Magic 8-Ball and shake it up again and let's see what is tells us. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:01 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: WORM_KLEZ.G Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Thats the virus softwares job we pay him good money to do this. He told me that no one is infected. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Why you no answer my question?? Quack! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Dont you get paid to find out if anyone is infected or not? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I dont know if I anyone is infected or not we just keep receiving a ton of emails with viruses in them. -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen that happen here too. We block the files and antigen catches it but the media player/real player does start. Nothing bad happens after that which is a good thing. Sandhya -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I'm afraid you've gone and mystified me. If you're blocking all those filetypes, how can Klez get through to open Windows Media Player? -Peter -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G how do you stop it from opening windows media player even if i am blocking scr exe pif bat vbs js and com. I am using scanmail for exchange verson 3.52 -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen some klez-g messages with bat and scr attachments. Of course there may be disagreement on exactly what constitutes the G variant. -Peter -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If I am reading this article correctly, then it will have a random extension if it is a earlier variation of KLEZ. This particular version has either .exe or a double extension. Please correct me if I'm wrong. http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.html?id=4292 Jessica -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I was under the impression that the extension is random. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Block .exe -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WORM_KLEZ.G DOES ANYONE KNOW
RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000
Hope you're not trying to imply that an NT 4.0 client can't be part of a native mode domain . . . Pardon me if I misread your comment. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 Recommend reading description of what NATIVE MODE means From: John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/17 Wed PM 04:26:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 I have NO IDEA why...my NT workstation clients cannot connect to Exchange 2000. I have name resolution for both WINS and DNS and even got so desperate as to put entries in the LMHOSTS and HOSTS files! Win2k Machines connect no problem. I am in native mode. Any help would be greatly appreciated Thanks John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify...
Stop it, Ben, you're confusing these poor souls (thinks: he took the words right outta my mouth) - they probably think I'm you, or you're just posting under a different name :) must be that twin stuff mom keeps mentioning . . . James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... Did you even take a look at the FAQ's? it took me all of about 30 seconds to look through the Technical Stuff and find FAQ 3.58. How freakin' hard can that be? It is pretty self explanatory when you read the description of what each section is about. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... My ? was where in the FAQ do I find these things? Is there a search engine built in? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... You gotta wait 2 hours for the permissions to update. If you don't want to wait read the FAQ to find out what you need to do. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... thank you for that pat on the back. I am not stupid but I need hands on training. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... You have failed Grasshopper. Original message Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 11:07:20 -0500 From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But where does a person begin to look? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... I believe permissions propagation is covered in the FAQ link below. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Needing to open a mailbox to verify... Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 We have mailboxes on two servers. Sometimes for no reason at all people cannot get into one or the other server. There are no errors on the logs and we can't figure out what is going on. We would like to build a mailbox on each server that will allow us to test if the server is working when people call into the Help Desk stating that they cannot access the server. I have built the mailbox and am trying to test this new procedure out. I have given the help desk people USER permission on the mailbox. I have created a new profile on the help desk workstation. When the Help desk person signs on, they use their userid and password, they get the 'Unable to open your default e-mail folders. You do not have permissions to sign on.' message. I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong. I went to the knowledge database and get The logon credentials of the Exchange Client or Outlook are different from the logon credentials of the user logged into the workstation. But what exactly does that mean? Please help me. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Haiku Friday
Three day weekend! Happy for president's day No work on Monday James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Watch the Olympics Drink plenty of beer, and cheer Glad Friday is here! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
What a big joke Canadiens really got robbed Sack the bad judges! And give a second Gold medal to the great pair To whom it belongs Jamie Sale and David Pelletier are The real winners here! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday In figure skating A judging controversy Who'd have imagined? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Christensen Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Watch the Olympics Drink plenty of beer, and cheer Glad Friday is here! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Things are OK now, Canadians got gold too Good call IOC! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What a big joke Canadiens really got robbed Sack the bad judges! And give a second Gold medal to the great pair To whom it belongs Jamie Sale and David Pelletier are The real winners here! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday In figure skating A judging controversy Who'd have imagined? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Christensen Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Watch the Olympics Drink plenty of beer, and cheer Glad Friday is here! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Hey, are you dissing ballroom dancing? Ballroom dancing is totally awesome, if you can get good instruction. I went to a school where they have the best ballroom dance program in the world. It's actually a lot of fun - especially the latin stuff. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Steve Aldred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday No worse than ice dance Ballroom dancing is not part of Summer Olympics Steve -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Curling's not a sport. Sweeping up the ice? What's next - Gold for Shoveling? -Original Message- From: Steve Aldred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Canada will get revenge during curling when we kick Russians butts Steve -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What a big joke Canadiens really got robbed Sack the bad judges! And give a second Gold medal to the great pair To whom it belongs Jamie Sale and David Pelletier are The real winners here! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday In figure skating A judging controversy Who'd have imagined? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Christensen Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Watch the Olympics Drink plenty of beer, and cheer Glad Friday is here! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
::dances around Martin's futile punches and kicks:: BG Dude, you don't know what you're missing until you've tried it. Just watch some of the top-notch competitors, and you will see what I mean. Believe me, ballroom dancing is NOT a girly-man thing. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday ::beats up James:: -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Hey, are you dissing ballroom dancing? Ballroom dancing is totally awesome, if you can get good instruction. I went to a school where they have the best ballroom dance program in the world. It's actually a lot of fun - especially the latin stuff. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Steve Aldred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday No worse than ice dance Ballroom dancing is not part of Summer Olympics Steve -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Curling's not a sport. Sweeping up the ice? What's next - Gold for Shoveling? -Original Message- From: Steve Aldred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Canada will get revenge during curling when we kick Russians butts Steve -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What a big joke Canadiens really got robbed Sack the bad judges! And give a second Gold medal to the great pair To whom it belongs Jamie Sale and David Pelletier are The real winners here! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday In figure skating A judging controversy Who'd have imagined? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Christensen Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Watch the Olympics Drink plenty of beer, and cheer Glad Friday is here! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: sharing a mailbox
Give them permissions in exchange admin - you can add them as a user to the mailbox, assuming that the user in question has requested this person be able to access their inbox, or has at least approved this. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sharing a mailbox if a user needs access to someones inbox or calender,how do i do that? Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
Are there any rules set to permanently delete any items? I have noticed that when I upgraded to OL 2002 that if I tried to implement a rule to permananently delete an item, it automatically stopped processing other rules. Just a thought. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002 I am having a failure on a client's system in which Outlook 2002 refuses to activate new rules. The error reports that there are options used which prevent the rule from being activated or there is not enough room to store all the rules. There are only 26 simple rules and it is refusing the 27th rule. I have deleted some rules 'to make room' and still get the same failure. The rule that is failing this time is a simple rule to move all traffic from this list to a specified folder; nothing elaborate. This has happened before but went away. Suggestions? Thanks .. Dean M. Dorman Systems Administrator Putnam Company / Acorn Markets http://www.acornmarkets.com PGP Key fingerprint: 6ABF BAF4 7784 1F54 18A6 C8A6 C788 4C14 22C2 5A75 .. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: password protected PST files
I believe one utility you can use is PST19UPG. Although its main purpose is to upgrade the .pst to version 19, it also can strip out .pst passwords. Not officially supported by Microsoft, but do a search on yahoo for pst19upg, and you can find it. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: password protected PST files Afternoon all I once had a password recovery tool for PST files but now I can't find it. Anyone point me in the right direction please? Thanks Dom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
Mm, whipping up :) James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. No, but I can whip you up. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. While you are at it, can you whip me up a sandwich and chips as well? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. Yes, that would be relevant wouldn't it? I would need to find the solution and test it to answer that question. It's probably something that an exchange developer just whipped up to help out with the Melissa virus. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. Did that block future messages with attachments or did that just kill the attachments already in the store? (or both) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. I recall a former tech lead removing all attachments on an Exchange server because he put a wrong value in the registry (he just want to remove the I love you attachments). I had to restore that server, which is why I remember. I don't remember where exactly this was set, but if I come across it later this evening I will post it. -Original Message- From: adam voorhies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Filtering virus file extensions. I know there is a way to filter virus file extensions on an exchange server by adding keys tot he registry. I cannot remember the exact keys and syntax needed to do this. If any of you Exchange Gurus out there may know what I am talking about, I would really appreciate the memory refresh. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook hangs up
We have, on occasion had users with this problem - multiple versions of Outlook. As I recall, the problem always appeared to be related to having multiple copies of the outlook address book. If you check the properties for your outlook address book, you may find more than one. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook hangs up Good Morning, Outlook 98 and NT 5.5 SP4 Windows 95. It seems that everyday, once a day, my Outlook hoses up. It is usually when I am creating (replying to) a message. I put the name in the TO: field and tab down to enter my message and the name does not resolve. If I don't notice the name has not resolved and send the message Outlook sits there and does nothing. I have to Ctrl Alt Delete to get my Outlook back. I also have to get rid of the Wfcrun32 task or my tabbing capabilities doesn't work. Has anyone experienced similar problems? Happy New Year. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR for Calender meeting
Actually, I have been having the same problem here - with our VP. We have actually checked in his Outlook for any delegates, and there are none. There are absolutely no references at all to this former employee. Yet, whenever a calendar request is sent to this VP the sender gets an NDR back, just like is mentioned in here. The only other thing that we could think of was to delete the mailbox and recreate it (which we haven't done yet). If anybody else has any better ideas, please let us know. Looks like there are lots of us with this problem . . . James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: NDR for Calender meeting You won't find it on the Delegates tab in Exchange Administrator. The *real* recipient still has the former employee defined as a delegate in Outlook. The user (AKA *real* recipient) must remove it. -Original Message- From: Berquam, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR for Calender meeting I'm actually having this exact problem. The NDR is for the former employee. I have gone into the delegates section and removed the name, but the error is still there. Any suggestions on how to get rid of this 'phantom' delegate entry? Thanks -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR for Calender meeting Destination user may have a delegate specified who is no longer with the company. -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR for Calender meeting Brothers en Sisters, Env. Exchange 5.5 sp 4, Outlook 98, Problem: When users try to make an appointment via Calander they get an NDR but the destination user recieves the invitation. An a few seconds later the sender recieves a delivered message also. It is only for 5 recepients. Has someone an idea about this problem? gr m _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Hello neighbors too I still live in Ann Arbor Work in Novi now We relocated Our office further away Now I must commute James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Haiku Friday Well, hello neighbor! Used to be in Ann Arbor Now in Belleville though -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Your from Ann Arbor? Me Too! I work there at night And live in Howell Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday MI is relaxed For example Ann Arbor Has drive through beer shop S. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Beer from a Grocer ? You Can't do that in P A ! Against antique laws. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Wish I had some beer Ran out of six packs at home Must run to Kroger. -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's Friday at three I've had four pints of beer I'm a happy boy -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday weekend here we go tonight i will be drunken then play ps2 -Original Message- From: Antony Slatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 13:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Wow, a night alone Gin, wine, TV and more Gin gonna regret it -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 13:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Friday is now here Got Car Trouble Work Trouble Servers still run though Denis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of SchlumbergerSema. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the SchlumbergerSema Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 121 627 5600. ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Haiku Friday
For the second time In only about two months His wife must miss him :) James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Haiku Friday It could still be worse He could be in Germany Just like his brother -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Hello neighbors too I still live in Ann Arbor Work in Novi now We relocated Our office further away Now I must commute James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Haiku Friday Well, hello neighbor! Used to be in Ann Arbor Now in Belleville though -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Your from Ann Arbor? Me Too! I work there at night And live in Howell Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday MI is relaxed For example Ann Arbor Has drive through beer shop S. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Beer from a Grocer ? You Can't do that in P A ! Against antique laws. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Wish I had some beer Ran out of six packs at home Must run to Kroger. -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's Friday at three I've had four pints of beer I'm a happy boy -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday weekend here we go tonight i will be drunken then play ps2 -Original Message- From: Antony Slatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 13:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Wow, a night alone Gin, wine, TV and more Gin gonna regret it -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 13:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Friday is now here Got Car Trouble Work Trouble Servers still run though Denis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of SchlumbergerSema. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the SchlumbergerSema Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 121 627 5600. ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: New Virus outbreak
Just got released officially about 20 minutes ago. Definition is from 12/4, version 31204p. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: New Virus outbreak I've been hitting live update on Norton AV 2001 on my desktop every hour today. Nothing past 28 Nov. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Stop plate Tectonics! -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Ooops.. insert foot in mouth). We use Symantec and Trend here. I know Trend has been picking it up all day with the new defs, but Norton must not have a new def out yet. I just checked again and it looks like Nov. 28th is the latest for Norton. Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Network Issues Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Where did you find the defs? I am unable to download it from Symantec's site as it still as the defs dated 28Nov2001 and LiveUpdate says that we have the current defs. -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Yep. Has been available for a few hours, I believe. Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Network Issues Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Does anyone know if Symantec has come out with a def update for this virus? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak I concur. I don't think there is a way. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak No.. not that I have found. The attachment gets stripped out and the mail goes on it's merry way to the user. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Alright, but even if it blocks the attachment it still sends mail to the user. Is there anyway to stop that? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak It will block the attachments first. So it never gets scanned, just deleted. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak After updating to pattern file 177 is anyone getting the email alerts Virus Found? All I'm still getting is attachment blocking alerts? Doesn't seem like the pattern file has kicked in. Has anyone experienced this?? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Probably some user that has hotmail or something. I just sent an email to all my users begging them not to use it today. -Original Message- From: Schneider, Rudy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Even though we were blocking .scr we still had the virus explode within...BUMMER!!! Trend 177 catches it...have updated...now to get the PCs infected... rudy ;-) Network Engineer/E-Mail Administrator VLC, an Anchor Gaming Company 2311 South 7th Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak We have been blocking .scr's for a LONG
RE: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook!
By chance, are you dealing with someone who also has Lotus Notes installed? James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook! Does anyone know how to reset the application that handles mailto links, and which application handles this? thanks -TOny -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Today is meet the moron day: http://www.vna1.com/sjvn.html -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Not at all. Look over his articles and I will bet that he's pumping the praise for NetScreen and Norton.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Anyone else think it's extremely funny that the guy writing this article has all of that equipment in his house. ...as I sit in my home in the Blue Ridge Mountains, looking over my NetScreen-10 Firewall Appliance log, I can see the number of attacks on my network rise above twenty--and that's just for today. Norton Anti-Virus for Gateways reports that three Nimda-infected messages have been blasted so far as they tried to reach my Ipswitch mail server. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? I prefer Outlook. I use a policy to keep it locked down on the client side. I don't believe that the problem stems from the creation of Outlook. The problem is that some admins are not pro-active. Others are simply too busy or overworked. I think most engineers know what to do they just have a hard time keeping up with everything. Especially when you a one man/woman (person?) shop! (I'll use myself as an example). -Original Message- From: Dean, Nathaniel, V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? This has been talked about before. Whatever is the dominant application will see the dominant hacks, security holes and have viruses written just for them. If your users are satisfied with the free products that are out then use them. We used pegasus mail back in the early 90's... -Original Message- From: Steve Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ban Outlook? Anyone care to comment? http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,28 14683,00.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
