RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages
Are you sure it's not an inbox assistant rule creating a copy? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages We turned it off but she is still getting duplicates. She has had two in the last hour since we turned it off. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages The SMPT Fixup is part of the PIX. It is well documented that for the BAS (c) syndrome and cause freaky problems such as the one you're experiencing now. I suggest you disable it and use an SMTP relay of some kind. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages Why would only one person in our company be getting duplicates? I'll be honest. I have no idea what SMTP Fixup even is. Ya gotta learn somewhere. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages My money says yes and they have the SMTP Fixup Enabled -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages are you behind a PIX Firewall? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Receiving Duplicate Messages Hello All, I have a W2k box with Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user who is getting duplicate messages from 1 specific person. This person says she is able to send email to other people and they are not getting duplicates. I really think that there is a problem on their side, but I will investigate things here. Do you have ideas as to why MY email server would be duplicating email messages for one user only? Here comes the newbie questionIs there a way I can monitor or check if a piece of email is being duplicated by exchange? Thanks for any help. I don't know the person sending the mail, so I have no information on their setup. I will be trying to call their LAN administrator and figure it all out. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS QUESTION
Webtrends can simply retrieve the log files, you don't need to write a batch file. You might also want to move this discussion over to http://www.15seconds.com/listserv.htm, an IIS5 list where it is more on topic. Also, if this is a public website, I would not have them as member servers of your internal domain -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION i cannot take that risk that comes along with the odbc logging i thought about it, these are highly visible websites in my organisation and a lot of traffic. I am thinking of just writing them to the local disk and then copy them to the logfile server every night with a batch file before the webtrends prog runs to analyse the logs. thx -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS QUESTION Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS QUESTION
DUDE - I did read the whole thread. What it appears you are trying to accomplish is getting IIS to log everything to a mapped drive or UNC path - if your web sites are so high traffic as you claim, you wouldn't want to incur the network overhead of doing that. So then YOU SAID, and I quote I am thinking of just writing them to the local disk and then copy them to the logfile server every night with a batch file before the webtrends prog runs to analyse the logs. I just pointed out that you don't need to write a batch file - which if you knew you didn't need to write a batch file, why did you say you would write a batch file. Yes, I have ideas. -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION dude read thw whole message before answering..not trying to be rude.i know i dont need a batch file for web trends..if you read my entire problem you would have known what i was trying to accomplish, if you have any ideas for my problem i will appreciate it. thx -Original Message- From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION Webtrends can simply retrieve the log files, you don't need to write a batch file. You might also want to move this discussion over to http://www.15seconds.com/listserv.htm, an IIS5 list where it is more on topic. Also, if this is a public website, I would not have them as member servers of your internal domain -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION i cannot take that risk that comes along with the odbc logging i thought about it, these are highly visible websites in my organisation and a lot of traffic. I am thinking of just writing them to the local disk and then copy them to the logfile server every night with a batch file before the webtrends prog runs to analyse the logs. thx -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS QUESTION Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: clustering wireless
Remember, with MS clustering, you will need a shared storage array. That most likely means you would need fiber between the buildings. There are also 3rd party packages that claim to do clustering over a WAN without a shared array. Maybe you should take a step back and really decide if you need true failover. I think most people on this list will tell you that clusters aren't worth the effort - there are better ways to ensure availability. Remember also with a cluster, if you corrupt the database, you corrupt the database :-) Having a cluster doesn't protect you against the corruption. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless no im not trying to set it up i want to get a solution on how we are going to connect the two buildings wireless with failover -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Sounds like a cluster fsck -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline Address Book Generation
Q237866 -Original Message- From: Sabre A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 4:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline Address Book Generation Greetings, some time ago I posted this question but never got a response. I was just wondering if anyone had any ideas in relation to this matter. Thanks. Hi, we have an Exchange Server 5.5 SP3 environment configured with Australia as a single site with a server in each branch office as part of this site. Recently we have been having offline address book issues with laptop users, as they attempt to synchronize their PC with one particular Exchange Server's offline address book. They recieve the error message an error occured while opening the microsoft exchange offline address book files on the microsoft exchange server. When we attempt to regenerate an offline address book on this server, the operation fails, and the event log contains Event ID 5004. None of the other exchange servers in the Australian site are experiencing this issue. We have already searched through the Microsoft Knowledgebase looking for solutions but at this point have been unable to find anything which resolves the matter. Has anyone had a similar experience and sucessfully resolved the problem? Regards, Luke Cassar Technical Consultant = Dare to be indifferent -Sabre- __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Admins - Heads Up
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2001/01-021.htm -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Admins - Heads Up Follow-up: another admin reported his servers are being scanned and his inbound traffic is spiking bad right now. H _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
From local radio news in DC, yes -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
Local DC radio reporting it was a small Cessna hitting the Pentagon -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! Something got hit in DC apperantly a Army Helicopter was 'involved' - Original Message - From: Robert Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: RE: Urgent! Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
God Bless America! Has anyone heard any reports of any related cyber attacks that we should be watching out for? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! Importance: High Seems that one of the towers collapsed ... man this is sickening :( Martin - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: Urgent! Something got hit in DC apperantly a Army Helicopter was 'involved' - Original Message - From: Robert Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: RE: Urgent! Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you belive this crap?
It was a small executive jet that was in the air when the shut down was enacted. After significant in-air interrogation, it was determined that the jet was legitimately headed to DC and was escorted to the airport. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can you belive this crap? Anyone heard any reports about the Plane that was headed for Washington DC, that military jets intercepted. They reported that the military forced it to land. Anyone heard anything else on this. I hope they can apprehend one of the terroists on this plane if the reports turn out to be true. I am sure we have some very talented CIA agents who live to interrogate through painful torchure. My prayers and Sorrows go out to all effected. -Tony -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can you belive this crap? Hmm, I guess we can rule out the spoofing theory. Peter -- From: John Allhiser Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can you belive this crap? Uh, go to their site http://www.coffeecup.com/ They have a pop up ad- -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can you belive this crap? This email could have been spoofed...I seriously doubt the CEO of any company would do something like this. I am guessing that it's a disgruntled employee. John -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can you belive this crap? I supposed if they find out that people in France were responsible for the terrorist attack that we should massacre all the men women and children there that had nothing to do with it. Nice company coffee crap -Original Message- From: CoffeeCup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 11, 2001 10:29 AM To: Loyal User Subject: The Attacks on the US Hello everyone, This is Nicholas Longo, the CEO of CoffeeCup Software. As you may have heard the World Trade Center and Pentagon were attacked about 45 minutes ago. The Team at CoffeeCup would like to send our heart felt sorrow to those that perished in these attacks. We would like to also say on record that if any country is found responsible for these attacks, we call for that country's complete destruction and annihilation. Do not let terrorism which is designed to create fear and stop production, halt your life or work. Stay focused and do not stop what you are doing. -May God bless us all and the decisions we must make. Nick- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
