RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification
Does anyone know whether you still need this patch if you already applied the September Post SP3 Rollup? I mentioned last week that the files appears to be the same. But didn't see any response to that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:38 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: patch MS03-046 update clarification Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification that is what I thought ... just making sure I didn't need new glasses thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification The patch was not redone. Just the wording of the alert. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario, W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ... (snippet from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms03-046.asp ) V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published. V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from "Deployment" in the "Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4" section of "Security Patch Information." Comments? Clarifications? mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot off the Fixes....
It appears that MS03-046 (829436) is a duplicate of September Post SP3 Rollup. I have checked several files to have the same date, size and version. SPMSG.DLL and SPUNINST.EXE is missing from the \Bin directory however. Should I reinstall it nonetheless? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 5:13 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Hot off the Fixes Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes Thank you very much for all your information! Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes The newsfeed is http://www.thundermain.com/rss/ I use NewsGator which integrates with Outlook -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes Hi Martin Can you tell me how you did this? I just downloaded a RSS newsreader and I don't know how to get it to work with MS.. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes I have an RSS newsfeed that tells me anytime MS makes a new download available -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes How did you hear about this (MS046)? I'm subscribed to MS's security bulletin service but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this patch. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes MS03-046 is listed as "critical" and involves somebody sending bogus data to your smtp port. In our case, the smtp port of our exchange server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus gateway and then to the exchange machine. In this scenario, the bogus smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server. If your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a hurry to load that patch. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hot off the Fixes Anyone applied these yet? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECT
Track missing email
Hi, I am lost and need your advise. We have two users and a PF that is subscribed to a list. One user would periodically report that he does not receive an email. I set up the PF just so he can easily compare with his own. I have enabled message tracking, but not sure where the problem sits at the moment. And for troubleshooting sake, I also have requested him to turn off all his rules. Where can I start to identify the problem? Our environement is E2K-SP3 and W2K-SP4 and post SP4, no post SP3 roll-up for E2K. Thanks in advance. ~justin PS... How do I get a complete message header, especially those that is posted to the Public Folder? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re[2]: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to exchange Mail
Can you also run Activesync thru t-mobile? -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:18 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Re[2]: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to exchange Mail Subject: RE: Re[2]: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to exchange Mail I use t-mobile vpn imap to exchange works like a champ. T-mobile pocket pc -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re[2]: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to exchange Mail Hello Brian, Tuesday, March 4, 2003, 3:11:00 PM, you wrote: BK> 1. Thera phone does work. Work well??? I think so. BK> 2. You need an Expansion pack for HP IPaq in order to use the BK> AirCard. I think Thera might be a better option since you may not be BK> very happy with IPaq battery life. BK> 3. VPN - Tried it but did not pursue it. You can use MIS 2002, BK> Infowave (www.infowave.com), www.Wirelessknowledge.com BK> Brian BK> -Original Message- BK> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BK> Jean-Francois Bourdeau BK> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:52 AM BK> To: Exchange Discussions BK> Subject: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to exchange Mail BK> Hi (THANKS FOR YOUR HELP ) BK> My customer want to buy a PocketPc or Cell/PocketPC (Audiovox Thera BK> Cell/Pocket BK> http://www.audiovox.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ExecMacro/catalog_pocketP BK> C.d2 BK> w/in BK> put?cat=874323) to access his MS exchange eMail from everywhere (vpn, BK> web, BK> messenger etc) BK> Our phone company Bell, has 2 options to access the internet BK> The Thera Pocket PC Phone ? BK> Or an Airdcard 555 card for Pocket PC BK> My question are : BK> 1) Did anyone try the Thera phone ? Work well ? BK> 2) What does a PocketPC need to use a AirCard 555 card ? it fit BK> where in the ipaq ? wich ipaq model are more suitable for that ? BK> 3) did anyone tried to VPN an server to read oulook mail (exchange BK> server) ? Possible ? Or it's better to go pop3 ? (do we need extra BK> software ? ) BK> Thanks a lot BK> JF BK> _ BK> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm BK> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp BK> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BK> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BK> _ BK> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm BK> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp BK> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BK> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks a lot Brian for your answers JF -- Best regards, Jean-Francoismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full-text indexing gone!
Did the link Tom included help with your problem? What was the solution? -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:22 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Full-text indexing gone! Subject: RE: Full-text indexing gone! Sorry, I was a bonehead with the message below... Not enough info. Win2K Cluster, E2K SP2... Full-Text Indexing is working fine on the Public store. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:54 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Full-text indexing gone! Subject: RE: Full-text indexing gone! My initial guess as to "What happened" is to say "Exchange 2000 SP3 happened (all of a sudden)." If so, read the following link. <http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/sp3/Rnotes_US.htm#CI> So... What version & SP? > -----Original Message- > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 02:10 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Full-text indexing gone! > Subject: RE: Full-text indexing gone! > > > Hi, > > All of a sudden, our Full-Text Indexing is gone. Public > project is still up and running. But no option to recreate, > delete nor propagate. What happened? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DELL PowerVault 220S (RAID) configuration and PERC3/DC
Transaction logs had been accounted for with a smaller size mirror drives. Our issue is with the quorum disk. OS likes to see it as a separate hard disk... So if one were to configure the RAID volume as large as possible and then use the OS to partition the logical drives, we would not maximize the diskspace. However, if there is not a strong argument against using the RAID BIOS to create the logical drives, we essentially tricked the OS to think that it's a physical drive when it's essentially a logical. I guess to paint a better picture, we have a PowerVault 220S, two 36Gb drives to be mirrored and ten 73Gb drives. From the ten 73Gb set, we like to have three physical drives (from OS standpoint... Don't ask me, it's cluster)... What is the best practice to achieve the most diskspace with f/t intact? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 6:38 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: DELL PowerVault 220S (RAID) configuration and PERC3/DC Subject: RE: DELL PowerVault 220S (RAID) configuration and PERC3/DC It depends. How do you plan to use this array? If this array will store the Logs and the Store, then I would configure the logs on a mirrored pair and create a RAID5 array with the remaining files. (This is assuming your are only planning one storage group on this 220s.) Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DELL PowerVault 220S (RAID) configuration and PERC3/DC I hear conflicting information from Dell support on how to configure logical drives. Like to hear from fields... Do you create the logical partitions with hardware (selection drives for the array and partition size) OR you create a RAID with the total usable space and using the OS to partition it? Is there a preference? Running AMI version of PERC3/DC in PowerEdge 2500 in a W2K cluster environment. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DELL PowerVault 220S (RAID) configuration and PERC3/DC
I hear conflicting information from Dell support on how to configure logical drives. Like to hear from fields... Do you create the logical partitions with hardware (selection drives for the array and partition size) OR you create a RAID with the total usable space and using the OS to partition it? Is there a preference? Running AMI version of PERC3/DC in PowerEdge 2500 in a W2K cluster environment. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full-text indexing gone!
Sorry, I was a bonehead with the message below... Not enough info. Win2K Cluster, E2K SP2... Full-Text Indexing is working fine on the Public store. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:54 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Full-text indexing gone! Subject: RE: Full-text indexing gone! My initial guess as to "What happened" is to say "Exchange 2000 SP3 happened (all of a sudden)." If so, read the following link. <http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/sp3/Rnotes_US.htm#CI> So... What version & SP? > -----Original Message- > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 02:10 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Full-text indexing gone! > Subject: RE: Full-text indexing gone! > > > Hi, > > All of a sudden, our Full-Text Indexing is gone. Public > project is still up and running. But no option to recreate, > delete nor propagate. What happened? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full-text indexing gone!
Hi, All of a sudden, our Full-Text Indexing is gone. Public project is still up and running. But no option to recreate, delete nor propagate. What happened? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public folder permission
A resource calendar was created and permission was assigned to a group. But it didn't propagate correctly as a result of deleting the Distribution List and creating a new Security Group with the same name or shortly after. I deleted that group over the weekend, waited about 20 minutes and then recreated it... Permission now do appears to pass in the public folder... However, I get NT Users: ## account in those public folders client permission tab. Furthermore, I am unable to modify the folder from neither OL nor ESM. I get 80040102 with ESM and Modified permisson cannot be saved in OL... Q31 appears to be pointing me towards the right direction, but we didn't modify any ExIFS... The only permission modification we did was either via OL or ESM. Anyone else with a better solution? Suggestion? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving exchange stores
Good morning, We have added a new storage box in our E2K cluster environment. We have relocated the Information Stores (priv, pub.edb/stm), transaction logs and system path... The one thing that we have not done is to move the MTA database. According to Q259896, it's pretty much straight forward. Has anyone done it before that runs E2K Cluster? Are there anything else that I need to move before I can extract the old storage box? Thanks in advance. ~justin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event: 2081
Anyone has any idea why this event is popping up every minutes? Thanks in advance. Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDSAccess Event Category: Topology Event ID: 2081 Date: 6/24/2002 Time: 12:11:13 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Process WINMGMT.EXE (PID=920). DSAccess will use the servers from the following list: Domain Controllers: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu Global Catalogs: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu The Configuration Domain Controller is set to dc2.ats.ucla.edu. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Block Size
Block size or file size? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 9:37 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Block Size Subject: Re: Block Size I made a mistake. EDB files are a set of 4K byte pages/files. Log files are 5K files. As far as the OS goes the default should be fine. The info comes from various sources. One is Q314917 and the Disaster Recovery for Exchange 2000 article. Both are on MS's website. Also some books on Exchange go into this in detail. Also Application log files can be adjusted and is usually based on number of mailboxes.Both articles should help you. - Original Message - From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: RE: Block Size Tony Thanks for your response. Do you know where you got the information on Block size from? I am trying to get something in writing that explicitly says what the best block size should be for the database and the transaction logs. Regards -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 June 2002 03:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Block Size 1 Yes log files should be put on a separate disk Not if you use multiple storage groups you will need separate physical disks. Raid 0+1 is best. Obviously this is in a perfect world. The block size is 4K As far as the other this link may help you further. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/tips/StorageTip1.asp - Original Message - From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:38 AM Subject: Block Size User Group We are using Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Can someone please point me to a document that will give me definitive answers to my questions below or can respond with positive answers: 1. What should the block size be for the Transaction logs (assuming that I have placed then on a different disk volume) 2. What should the block size be for the database taking into consideration that you have edb and stm files on the same volume. 3. What should the block size be for the operating system. 4. Can you please give an explanation as to why you would use the recommended block size for the above 3 questions. 5. Can anyone recommend a good TechNet article that covers this topic. Note I have looked on TechNet but have not really found anything concrete and on the user group archives. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT **
Uninstall E2K
I like to uninstall Exchange patch, Q303451... But it's complaining about iisproto.dll not being the right version. Does anyone know a way around it? I'm at 6.0.5762.3 and it's expecting 6.0.4720.42. ... And this is all because I want to have a clean Add/Remove Program ... Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring application for Exchange
Is it... Good product, good product? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:22 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Monitoring application for Exchange Subject: RE: Monitoring application for Exchange Good Answer. Good Answer. > -Original Message- > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Monitoring application for Exchange > > MessageOne maybe. > > Geoff > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Monitoring application for Exchange > > > Is there is a product out there that will monitor the > application/system/security NT logs on exchange servers and e-mail certain > errors? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Suburban versus Honda Civic, collision Where you want to sit? Please join Ralph Nader The conspiracy theory UFO coming! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:15 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Haiku Friday Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Refs get together And decide: What should we do: Free Whoppers / call fouls? > -Original Message- > From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > > > Each time Shaq touches > The round ball in the paint > An Offensive foul > > Kobe is quite good > With Shaq somewhat better, still > They don't equal Mike > > > -----Original Message- > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:48 AM > Posted To: Exchange List > Conversation: Haiku Friday > Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > > > L.A. Lakers, YEAH!!! > We are the champions!!! > Quapeat or 4-peat > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:41 AM > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > Conversation: Haiku Friday > Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > > > Damnit... I can't spell either. > > -Original Message- > From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > > > recommended site for you Michael > http://www.hearingplanet.com/hearstyle1.html > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > > > Portugal, Poland. They sound the dame. Sorry, had them backwards. > Thanks. > > -Original Message- > From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:23 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > > > USA lost to Poland. USA beat Portugal. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, > Michael > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > > > USA lost to Portugal > Portugal Sucks > USA still advancing though:-) > > -Original Message- > From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Haiku Friday > > > The Wings won last night > Stanley is home in Detroit > Now I can get sleep. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > personalmail > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > A
RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package
Not all files listed with the article are the same nor has the same version. I am going to apply April Post SP2 Rollup then Q320436. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:01 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package I don't know how large Q319743 is but usually QFEs include all debug symbols which are not included with a public hotfix AFAIK. The MSKB for Q320436 only mentions the CPU usage issue but it definitely fixes a whole lot other bugs. If you have both in front of you, unpack them and compare files + date/time stamps. > -Original Message- > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package > > Q319743 is ~32MB while Q320436 is ~15MB... Isn't Q320436 only address > the CPU usage issue? > > -Original Message- > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:45 AM > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > Conversation: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package > > > Q319743 indeed has been superseded by Microsoft Security Bulletin > MS02-025 (Q320436) even if it is not (yet?) mentioned anywhere. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:22 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package > > > > User Group > > > > > > We have been trying to get hold of the hot fix but my understanding is > > that Microsoft withdrew it (I stand to be corrected). > > > > Can you please confirm that it is available with you? > > > > > > There is also no reference to the Q article on June issue of TechNet. > > > > Regards > > > > Marc Mearns > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 14 June 2002 05:03 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package > > > > > > Hi, > > Has anyone applied this E2K Post SP2 Rollup? (Q319743) > > > > Please share your experience... Thanks. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** > > > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by > > MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > > > ** > > ** > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > > the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). > > > > The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > > MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > > > J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) > > Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) > > > > Registered Offices: > > 33 Holborn > > London > > EC1N 2HT > > > > ** > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package
Q319743 is ~32MB while Q320436 is ~15MB... Isn't Q320436 only address the CPU usage issue? -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:45 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package Q319743 indeed has been superseded by Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 (Q320436) even if it is not (yet?) mentioned anywhere. > -Original Message- > From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package > > User Group > > > We have been trying to get hold of the hot fix but my understanding is > that Microsoft withdrew it (I stand to be corrected). > > Can you please confirm that it is available with you? > > > There is also no reference to the Q article on June issue of TechNet. > > Regards > > Marc Mearns > > > -Original Message- > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 14 June 2002 05:03 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package > > > Hi, > Has anyone applied this E2K Post SP2 Rollup? (Q319743) > > Please share your experience... Thanks. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by > MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > ** > ** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). > > The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) > Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) > > Registered Offices: > 33 Holborn > London > EC1N 2HT > > ** > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
L.A. Lakers, YEAH!!! We are the champions!!! Quapeat or 4-peat -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:41 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Haiku Friday Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Damnit... I can't spell either. -Original Message- From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday recommended site for you Michael http://www.hearingplanet.com/hearstyle1.html -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Portugal, Poland. They sound the dame. Sorry, had them backwards. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday USA lost to Poland. USA beat Portugal. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday USA lost to Portugal Portugal Sucks USA still advancing though:-) -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday The Wings won last night Stanley is home in Detroit Now I can get sleep. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package
The article exists on the web but you have to call to get password and ftp info. I doubt they have retracted it as the gentleman I spoke with did not mention anything of that sort. I have installed it on our test machine and all appears to be running fine. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q319743 I lost track of which hotfix had been applied to the server. Add/Remove Program does not reveal all. Does anyone have a good way of finding out and tracking hotfixes, etc? Would Q319743 + Q320436 considered up-to-date patched or I'm missing anything? thx -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:22 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package User Group We have been trying to get hold of the hot fix but my understanding is that Microsoft withdrew it (I stand to be corrected). Can you please confirm that it is available with you? There is also no reference to the Q article on June issue of TechNet. Regards Marc Mearns -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 June 2002 05:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package Hi, Has anyone applied this E2K Post SP2 Rollup? (Q319743) Please share your experience... Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Post SP2 Hotfix Rollup Package
Hi, Has anyone applied this E2K Post SP2 Rollup? (Q319743) Please share your experience... Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline
We do have a cross-over cable for heart beat. Both of our public NIC is connected to the same switch. When the switch is taken down for whatever reason for more than 30 minutes, Exchange services will be stucked in the lala-land. Both Ed and Brian's response resulted in a bunch of Q articles to follow-up. Thanks!!! BTW: Has anyone replaced a new cluster node? We have a box to replace the passive node... Any pointers? ~justin -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, June 03, 2002 6:50 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline I'm not 100% sure but, I don't think teamed adapters are supported in a cluster. I'd have two unteamed adapters (+ an additional 1 for the heartbeat) going to different switches. Or just don't cluster I firmly believe that this will increase your availability or at least your saneness. Also make sure there is a DC as close as possible on the network. Brian -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline Seems to be a waste of money having a cluster when your network isn't redundant. Each node ought to have two "teamed" (to use HP ProLiant terminology) NICs, each of which is connected to as separate a network as possible. (Clustering seems a waste of money in most cases anyway.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline Hi, When network connection become unavailable for an extend period of time (like working on switches, etc...) our clustered Exchanges services goes offline and have a hard time coming back to reality. Manual procedure does bring it back online, however, this defeats the purpose of cluster. In a non-cluster Exchange environment, it is not as dependent on the networking and all Exchange services does not go offline... Does anyone know how to set up the virtual services to not depend on connection state as much? Vitals: Exchange 2K Cluster (Active/Passive), Win 2K, all patched. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline
Hi, When network connection become unavailable for an extend period of time (like working on switches, etc...) our clustered Exchanges services goes offline and have a hard time coming back to reality. Manual procedure does bring it back online, however, this defeats the purpose of cluster. In a non-cluster Exchange environment, it is not as dependent on the networking and all Exchange services does not go offline... Does anyone know how to set up the virtual services to not depend on connection state as much? Vitals: Exchange 2K Cluster (Active/Passive), Win 2K, all patched. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
C is more like S (Storage Works) and D (DEC) added together kinda C? I can name plenty of C words that would get me in trouble... Kings gonna Choke tonite Lakers play like Champs! -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:15 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I meant the company whose name starts with C and rhymes with Compaq. Can we use full names, I see most of you don't do this. I slipped up once in my last email. --Felicity > Now what starts with the letter C? > Cookie starts with C > Let's think of other things > That starts with C > Oh, who cares about the other things? > > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie starts with C > > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie starts with C > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D and > rhymes with Hell. > > I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error messages > in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the disk drive. > So I called the D company and every support engineer told me it was > something different. Eventually after I complained enough they started > sending me replacement drives through a vendor. I plugged these in same > message, they said oops, we sent you another bad drive, so their vendor > sent me another. Oops, it was the same one I originally sent out. > > So the D company eventually sent me a drive from their real warehouse, and > - we still got the error. Then they started saying that our application > had caused the hard drive error message, and we were to rebuild the drive > array from a backup. I asked them how is it that an application is > causing hard drive error's. > > They didn't have an answer. We eventually migrated to a different server > and we were able to sweet talk them into getting a replacement. > > I hated working on the innards of these servers as well. I mean have you > seen how they are laid out. The memory array card's have to be the most > bizzare thing I have ever seen. > > I broke a nail taking one of these out. > > Give me the C word any day. > > --Felicity > > > > Maybe it's time to go with D or I! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM > > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > > Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they = > > were > > not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a > > competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like > > servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I = > > think > > Ed is also from the C side, right? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed > > Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. =20 > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > I apologise for the OT question... > > > > Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? > > (hardware RAID) > > > > I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the = > > array it > > is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error = > > right? > > > > When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on t
RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
Maybe it's time to go with D or I! -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they were not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I think Ed is also from the C side, right? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I apologise for the OT question... Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? (hardware RAID) I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the array it is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error right? When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually corrupts) the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents backups from completing. hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't handle the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in the process of rebuilding itself... The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from scratch and restoring from backup Any thoughts? sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday afternoon Haiku for good measure: Friday afternoon gotta get going home server is cactus Thanks, MP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad amil folder management
Missy, I like the way you think! Felicity, I'm whacking my user right now GO LAKERS!!! Please don't get whacked tonite! -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:58 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Bad amil folder management Subject: RE: Bad amil folder management Actually there are other folders where you can whack (technical term, not that totally disgusting context you are thinking of missy) contents willy nilly (another technical term). For instance the nntp root folders. I was looking into importing\exporting newsgroup messages from one server to another and would whack (technical term), selected files and could occasionally get nntp to think the postings were its own. But it would send a lot of them to the badmail folder in nntp (which I would whack). --Felicity > So this is one place where you can do stuff outside of Exchange without > causing something to be corrupted? > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:37 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management > >=20 > >=20 > > Dang, it there I go again, forgetting to check the quote=20 > > reply check box. > >=20 > > I was suggesting that you just open up a command prompt=20 > > navigate to the bad mail folder and delete all the contents. > >=20 > > --Felicity > > > Speaking of perverse... > > >=20 > > > Or were you replying to something? > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Felicity Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:04 PM > > > Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > can't you just whack them? > > >=20 > > > --Felicity > > >=20 > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >=20 > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating a DL from a Contacts folder
Add that contact folder to Outlook Address book, then I think the shift key will do it. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:25 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Creating a DL from a Contacts folder Subject: Creating a DL from a Contacts folder Hi-- I have a user who has put a subset (roughly 300) of her Contacts into a subfolder. She now wants to create a personal DL from that subfolder. Is there a way she can do this without pointing and clicking 300 times? I tried exporting them, but couldn't figure out how to import them into a DL. I've tried searching the MS Outlook site, but had no luck. She's using Outlook 2000. Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore, MCSE American Friends Service Committee IT Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025
Nope, I installed onto our test server directly... Got two messages and then prompted to reboot... After reboot, all appears to be well. Reboot - my best troubleshooting tool! -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:11 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 To the best of my knowledge, if you install using Terminal Services, a reboot is required. From the console, it should not be required. Tom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Mine asked for a reboot. -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 May 2002 14:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 It wasn't required for my server, but I did it just in case. Chuck -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Microsoft is probably scanning this mailing list now for everyone's experiences :) They want to know too if the reboot is required. -Original Message- From: Mikael Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Microsoft have written in their Security Bulletin MS02-25 that no reboot is needed. Anyone who have succeed to apply the patch with no reboot? -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 30 maj 2002 02:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 In my case I did apply to a test server first. I got could not stop msexchangesa and could not restart iisadmin services. Not a problem, I stopped the Exchange services manually, it requires a reboot anyway so restarting at time of install is not important. I've had similar services stopping and starting issues with every Exchange patch for E2k. That's why I test first. So far, 4 hours into it, no performance problems or loss of services on the test box. That's the important part. If it continues to be ok under load then I will apply it to a production server, after stopping all services manually first (something I learned to do as far back as 4.0). The important part is that I know what to expect when I apply the patch in production and that makes for a smooth transition and minimum downtime. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 17:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Hoooya! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:06 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 "Customers are advised to review the bulletin and *test* and deploy the patch in their environments, if applicable" -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Patch was unable to restart 'msexchangesa' and 'msexchangeis' automatically. Rebooted and all appears to be fine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:13 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Subject: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Title: Malformed Mail Attribute can Cause Exchange 2000 to Exhaust CPU Resources (Q320436) Date: May 29, 2002 Software: Microsoft Exchange 2000 Impact: Denial of Service Maximum Severity Rating: Critical Bulletin: MS02-025 The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 What Is It? The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 which concerns a vulnerability found in Microsoft Exchange 2000. Customers are advised to review the bulletin and test and deploy the patch in their environments, if applicable More information is now available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-025.
RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025
Hoooya! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:06 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 "Customers are advised to review the bulletin and *test* and deploy the patch in their environments, if applicable" -Original Message----- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Patch was unable to restart 'msexchangesa' and 'msexchangeis' automatically. Rebooted and all appears to be fine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:13 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Subject: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Title: Malformed Mail Attribute can Cause Exchange 2000 to Exhaust CPU Resources (Q320436) Date: May 29, 2002 Software: Microsoft Exchange 2000 Impact: Denial of Service Maximum Severity Rating: Critical Bulletin: MS02-025 The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 What Is It? The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 which concerns a vulnerability found in Microsoft Exchange 2000. Customers are advised to review the bulletin and test and deploy the patch in their environments, if applicable More information is now available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-025.asp <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-025.asp> If you have any questions regarding the patch or its implementation after reading the above listed bulletin you should contact Product Support Services in the United States at 1-866-PCSafety (1-866-727-2338). International customers should contact their local subsidiary. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--> Save 30% on Web addresses! Get with the times, get a web site. Share information, pictures, your hobby, or start a business. Great names are still available- get yours before someone else does! http://us.click.yahoo.com/XmK3jA/nFGEAA/sXBHAA/8vOslB/TM -~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025
Patch was unable to restart 'msexchangesa' and 'msexchangeis' automatically. Rebooted and all appears to be fine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:13 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Subject: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Title: Malformed Mail Attribute can Cause Exchange 2000 to Exhaust CPU Resources (Q320436) Date: May 29, 2002 Software: Microsoft Exchange 2000 Impact: Denial of Service Maximum Severity Rating: Critical Bulletin: MS02-025 The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 What Is It? The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 which concerns a vulnerability found in Microsoft Exchange 2000. Customers are advised to review the bulletin and test and deploy the patch in their environments, if applicable More information is now available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-025.asp <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-025.asp> If you have any questions regarding the patch or its implementation after reading the above listed bulletin you should contact Product Support Services in the United States at 1-866-PCSafety (1-866-727-2338). International customers should contact their local subsidiary. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--> Save 30% on Web addresses! Get with the times, get a web site. Share information, pictures, your hobby, or start a business. Great names are still available- get yours before someone else does! http://us.click.yahoo.com/XmK3jA/nFGEAA/sXBHAA/8vOslB/TM -~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
Same as yours but Active/Passive. How do you test the failover? I manually moved the resource and it was okay... Though I must admit, the fact that there's no sync utility for the configuration setting in SMMC is pretty weak. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:09 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? Subject: RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? Exchange 2000 SP2 a 2 node active/active cluster. Scanmail version is 6.0 This product is causing the cluster not to failover. What environment do you have? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? What version of Exchange, OS and ScanMail? -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:01 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? Subject: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? If so, are you experiencing any problems with this software not allowing the cluster to failover. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
What version of Exchange, OS and ScanMail? -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:01 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? Subject: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? If so, are you experiencing any problems with this software not allowing the cluster to failover. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ResolveP2
Unfortunately, when doing so, you'll have double email address appearing when sending to the people outside your organization. To complicate the matter more, Outlook that uses a LDAP server to look up user; resolve to friendly name as well. At the moment, I don't think there's an easy solution. Has anyone else experience this or am I taking too many puffs? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 3:36 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: ResolveP2 Subject: RE: ResolveP2 If you want it to be like that for everyone all the time, why not just set their display names to that? > -Original Message- > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: ResolveP2 > > > Does anyone know the value to unresolve address in Exchange > 2000? The format I would like to achieve is > > Frist_name Last_name [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > for the entire organization including those in the GAL and > LDAP. I have visited Q288635 and related articles to no > avail. Thanks for your insights. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ResolveP2 issue
Okay, let me rephrase it this way. How can I achieve this format, "First_name Last_name [ first_name . last_name @ domain .com]" globally, including those sitting in the same store in the From/To/CC fields? The value is resolve and E2K resolves everything. What I want is to 'UNRESOLVE' in E2K... ..man, there was major lagging this morning... ~justin -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 3:22 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: ResolveP2 issue Subject: RE: ResolveP2 issue Well, it's on Q288635. Don't know how you could miss it. = Use the following flags to determine which value to use: Field Value ---- FROM: 2 TO: and CC:16 REPLY TO: 32 To determine the value that you want to use, add the values for all of the elements that you want to be resolved. For example, to resolve all of the fields except the sender, type 48 (16+32=48). To resolve only the recipients, type only 16. By default, Exchange 2000 resolves everything (you can specify this behavior either by removing the key or by setting the value with this formula: 2+16+32=50). = In your case you want to resolve nothing, so your value should be 0. The example given in the q-article shows you how to do it with virtual server #2. If you're doing it on virtual server #1, you'll need to change ../parameters/2 to ../parameters/1. etc. > -----Original Message- > From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 01:35 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: ResolveP2 issue > Subject: ResolveP2 issue > > > Sorry for the duplicate if any... Didn't see my original post > as public folder. > > > > Does anyone know the value to unresolve address in Exchange > 2000? The format I would like to achieve is > > Frist_name Last_name [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > for the entire organization including those in the GAL and > LDAP. I have visited Q288635 and related articles to no > avail. Thanks for your insights. > > > > ~justin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ResolveP2 issue
Sorry for the duplicate if any... Didn't see my original post as public folder. Does anyone know the value to unresolve address in Exchange 2000? The format I would like to achieve is Frist_name Last_name [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] for the entire organization including those in the GAL and LDAP. I have visited Q288635 and related articles to no avail. Thanks for your insights. ~justin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ResolveP2
Does anyone know the value to unresolve address in Exchange 2000? The format I would like to achieve is Frist_name Last_name [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] for the entire organization including those in the GAL and LDAP. I have visited Q288635 and related articles to no avail. Thanks for your insights. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
