from:"PRamatowski"

RE: OWA cannot change password

2002-08-15 Thread PRamatowski



Archives *rock*

-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA cannot change password


That was indeed the problem, thank you very much for your answer.  I
followed the instructions in Q301428  and it works fine now.

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA cannot change password



Do you have the iisadmpwd virtual in your IIS configured?  IIS5.0 does not
install this virtual by default afaik.

S.

-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA cannot change password


OWA for Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on separate Windows 2000 box with
service pack 2 Using SSL to access OWA
Error: HTTP 500 Internal server error

I've set this up for testing and so far everything is working well except
you cannot change your password through the change password button under
options.

I found an article on how to setup the change password for Exchange 2000 but
none on 5.5

Thank you in advance,
Teresa 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OOF Messages to the Internet

2002-07-31 Thread PRamatowski

Last week, someone here *really* wanted this, so I pulled out my nifty
Exchange Mailing List CD, set the WayBack Machine for Feb 4, 2002 and found
this thread- "RE: Help with OOA"  I used bits of that thread to start a
pretty sweet discussion ;)

USer- "I want Automatic Replies and OOF"

Me-
No, and here's why:
[1] "I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please
 put me on your "A" list for resale to other spammers."
[2] "I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've
 just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax
 assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence.  Help
 yourself."
[3] "Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting 
 someone else in  my firm who wants your business.  The onus is, however,
 all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while
away.
 Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send
you
 an ascii answering machine message like this."
[4] "Why do you insist on letting thousands of listserv members everywhere
know you aren't
 at work?  The vast majority (all of us, really) couldn't care less."
[5] Mail loop- your server runs out of space and shuts down.

Given all that, is this a viable alternative-
Use a rule to forward relevant messages to a replacement or other delegate
who can then manually reply to select messages using a template?

User-
We have a business to run and would like to use this software feature to
help us, not continually get in the way.  I appreciate your opinions but
they are just that, your opinions.  What happened to trying to help our
business units get their jobs done?  I want to know what we can do to help.
If you can't help me then just say so.  I'll gladly take it to the next
level.

Me-
I am not trying to get in the way of your, or anyone else's business needs.
I simply presented to you the reasons why we (and may I add most of the
email community) are set up this way.  
"If you can't help me just say so". 
I won't take the above personally; this decision was not made by me alone.
Please feel free to take up this matter with whomever you would like.  

Oh, It got taken up all right... After the dust cleared, we aren't friggin'
doing Automatic Replies and OOF (*especially* Automatic Replies*)!

Paul

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOF Messages to the Internet

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, at 3:09pm, Sandhya Pai wrote:
>  Could someone give me specific examples or pointers on how can I
> justify not doing it or your opinions on why it's safe or not?

  One of our customers insisted we turn it on.  We did so.  Then @Home went
out of business, but someone with OOO turned on still managed to get a
message from someone @home.net.  OOO sent to @home.net, but got a bounce
message back.  That bounce message trigger the OOO again.  The system looped
like that until over 50,000 messages had been processed and 2+ GB of disk
space had been consumed by transaction log files, at which point the IS
crashed.  It took several hours to clean up the mess.

  OOO is turned off, now.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
| not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, 
| entity or  | organization.  All information is provided without 
| warranty of any kind.  |

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING

2002-07-12 Thread PRamatowski




Just f@rting around, I tried using Trend's eManager and hit a gotcha because
we host some listservs inside our firewall.

Outside addressees:
Listserver->Outbound IMS->Firewall-> addressee
outside addressees pass through the firewall and the message is delivered.

Inside addressees:
Listserver->Outbound IMS-> Firewall->bounces back to eManager(poof) 
Inside addressees , the firewall bounces the message back to the Trend box
where it's dropped :(

If both IMS's were inbound/outbound, my guess is this would work, but I'm
thinking there's a few more things to think about- like having to create a
rule for each one of 60+ domains, and I haven't thought about it to know
what else yet.

Sure not gonna fool with it on a Friday afternoon, but later...
Paul



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING


One could install an SMTP gateway application which refused inbound SMTP
mail FROM your domain.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING
> 
> The only way I can think of is to disconnect your server from the
> Internet.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING
> 
> 
> Halo GuRus,
> 
> Any best solution to stop the mail from spoofing? Recently i have
> received mails that always send to me with other sender name.This sender
> did not send the mails. The sender name is INTERNAL USER but the mail
> was coming from outside smtp address.
> 
> We can't block the sender to send mail, we cant stop the spoofing,what
> can i do?
> 
> This actual sender is from "240.039.039.2" FOR EXAMPLE ONLY. His address
> book have my internal user's email address. He take from it and put it
> in the "FROM" Column. and send to me.
> 
> Anyone out therethanks a lot
> 
> Poor
> Fioon
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Help in Deciphering . . .

2002-06-25 Thread PRamatowski




http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q284204

Numerical Code: 4.4.7 
Possible Cause: The message in the queue has expired. The sending server
tried to relay or deliver the message but the action was not completed
before the message expiration time occurred. This message can also indicate
that a message header limit has been reached on a remote server or some
other protocol timeout occurred while communicating with the remote server. 
Troubleshooting: This message usually indicates an issue on the receiving
server. Check the validity of the recipient address, and determine if the
receiving server is configured to receive messages correctly. It may be
necessary to reduce the number of recipients in the header of the message
for the host to which you are receiving this error. If you resend the
message, it is placed in the queue again. If the receiving server is up, the
message is delivered. 

Who won the bet?

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . .


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Help in Deciphering . . .
> 
> 
> Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the 
> recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? 
> I need to settle a bet! ;)
> 
> Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET
> Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com
> Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500
> 
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Action: delayed
> Status: 4.4.7
> Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500
> 

Server can't hand off. It's a 'temporary' error telling you it can't deliver
the message to the server. If it could contact the server and exchange
messages with it, but the receiving server couldn't find the mailbox in the
address you'd see something different.

-- 
Robert Moir, MSMVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer, 
Luton Sixth Form College
"And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're
here."
- apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe
salesman.

-- 
This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information
that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or
unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited.

The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or
policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mail Limits ????

2002-06-25 Thread PRamatowski


them i'd wager

-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Limits 



> All
> 
> As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just
> received an NDR in the postmaster account. Any ideas ???
> 
> Ex 5.5 Sp4 NT4 Sp6a
> 
> ***
> 
> A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error.
> 
>   4421643 bytes exceeds server limit of 300
> 
> 
> 
Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
London Road  Henley Road 
Teynham  Paddock Wood 
Kent Kent 
ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 

Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 
Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 

All business is conducted in accordance with the company's 
terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on 
request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated 
by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of 
this company.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: V5.5 SP3 to SP4

2002-06-24 Thread PRamatowski



Chris,


Not quite as many- We've got 50 sites and two dedicated bridgehead servers,
r 100 connectors on each bridgehead.   
It's been a while but I don't recall any issues when we went from SP3 to
SP4.

This is probably the hacks Nate was talking about...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q200259

Cheers,
Paul


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: V5.5 SP3 to SP4


Chris,

The only thing I remember hearing is that there is some reghack you need in
order to have over - I think the number was 20 - X.400 connectors.  You are,
however, way over that number so have probably already implemented that. 

The main thing I can forsee here is that the more X.400 connectors you have
on a single server the more resources you chew up and the bigger the
Administrative nightmare in your troubleshooting efforts.

Regards.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: Chris Jordan
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 06:08
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  V5.5 SP3 to SP4
> 
> We have a concern with an Exchange V5.5 SP3 to SP4 upgrade issue.
> 
> The issue we have is:
>  - We have over 300 X.400 connectors coming into a central hub site
> consisting of 4 servers. (150 remote sites, each with two connectors to
> different servers).
>  - At present we need to stop and restart the hub MTAs "a number of times"
> each week.
>  - SP4 is supposed to prevent this need for a restart on the MTAs.
>  - BUT we have heard rumours [1] that say it might introduce worse
> problems
> because we have that number of connectors.
> 
> Can anyone confirm, or deny, the rumours?
> 
> Cheers, Chris
> 
> [1] Someone installed SP4. The server crashed[2]. It had to be
> re-configured[3] from scratch.
> [2] It might or might not have been SP4 that caused the crash.
> [3] The "Someone" is no longer available, as he didn't take appropriate
> steps before the upgrade to allow a smooth recovery.
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: very OT

2002-06-14 Thread PRamatowski


Winston Cup?

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: very OT


WC?  Water closet?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: very OT


Hi, 
where can I find live feed of the WC?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq

2002-06-13 Thread PRamatowski



Put *that* in your[1] blb and smoke it!

[1] metaphorically speaking of course.


paul

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq


Exactly. In Exchange, if I email a 1MB file to 100 people in the company,
that file use 1MB of disk space.
If I do the same email, yet everyone is using PST files, It now consumes
100MB of disk space.

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq


I would bet that on that (4x) .pst file, you have a lots of messages that
refers to the same attachments.  Exchange server will take care of it with
SIS, but .pst breaks that.

Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA 

> -Original Message-
> From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:14 AM
> Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
> Conversation: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
> Subject: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
> 
> 
> In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is "Messages take up more
> space in a PST than in an Exchange store." I seem to be 
> finding that that is true but I am finding some of them 
> taking up something like 4 times as much space which seems 
> overboard to me. Others only seem to be increasing by about 
> 30% not 300% so I'm thinking there must be something odd 
> going on. Does anyone know what the range of "more space" is? 
> Or why some folders would be that much worse than others? Or 
> do I have screwed up folders in some fashion? Searching the 
> FAQ didn't find anything specific enough and searching 
> Technet I didn't find anything that gave me any quantitative 
> information. Even the qualitative information was not as 
> helpful as it seems it could have been. Which is to say I 
> couldn't find any indication of what the causes might be so 
> that I could see if they applied more in one case than 
> another. If any one knows one way or another if a 4x factor 
> is not atypical I would appreciate the tip. Ditto any tips on 
> the range of "more space". Or any suggestions at all really.
> 
> Thanks all,
> 
> Ronni
> 
> 
> P.S. To save time let me make clear that I am aware that
> "disk space costs are the same". Actually they are not, in 
> that CDs per MB are still cheaper than SCSI disk per MB even 
> with a 4x size factor on the pst file. And I know pst=bad for 
> many reasons not just number 7, but we are only using them 
> for archival (FAQ: PST=Good#2) purposes (many messages with 
> deliverable documents or what-have-you creates a large 
> mailbox fairly easily) so the users have what they sent 
> clients and also what the clients sent us for when questions 
> come up again. As they often do. And this is way cheaper for 
> us than upgrading to the Enterprise version of Exchange 2000 
> would be in order to get an unlimited store even if disk 
> space weren't an issue.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Wal-Mart

2002-06-12 Thread PRamatowski


erm...I'll bite.

Wal-Mart sells both?

paul

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Wal-Mart


What's that mean? Indoor plumbing and double glaized windows?[1]

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA

[1] Beer at MEC from me for the first person to get the reference.


> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Wal-Mart
> 
> 
> Jeez where as this thread gone? Had the interview yesterday 
> went well. They
> are hiring for 3 Exchange positions. When I asked him what is 
> Bentonville is
> like, all he said was it has all the modern amenities.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Baker, Jennifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:01 PM
> Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
> 
> 
> > That and my own personal feather fan boy.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:31 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
> >
> >
> > Doesn't decent pay in Arkansas equate to being enough to afford the
> Learjet
> > to commute home to a real state every night?
> >
> > --
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Peregrine Systems
> > Atlanta, GA
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
> > >
> > >
> > > They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago.  The pay was
> > > decent...but it's still in Arkansas.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Re: Wal-Mart
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone
> > > else worked there
> > > and what they thought about the working environment. They are
> > > switching from
> > > 5.5 to 2000.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hmm, yes.  Anyone, please spill all the details about their
> > > infrastructure.
> > > > Juuust curious.
> > > >
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: OT: Wal-Mart
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in
> > > Bentonville on their
> > > email
> > > > system?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:   
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > 
> _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:   
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:   
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:

RE: Searching the archives

2002-06-07 Thread PRamatowski





 It's all about the archives...

and

flunky- " The server just went south and so did the internet connection!
How we going to research this?" 
me-  [2] "Like this."

[1] Now.
[2] On or about July 3rd, that's when Aaron(sp?) says to expect the latest
and greatest ArchiveCD. Technically we'd have to lose three servers for me
to lose my replicas going back to Q1 1999, but wtf. I could burn my own CD,
but wtf again.


I didn't ask for Lisa, because Aaron was so nice :)


Paul


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching the archives


OK is this a "Its Friday and you are not reading the FAQ response?  You guys
can't be serious?  Buy a CD that is going to be out of date instantly.

Jim  

> -Original Message-
> From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Searching the archives
> 
> 
> typical response for that is "buy the cd"
> Oh yes - this information is also in archives :=)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:31 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Searching the archives
> 
> 
> I have never been able to search the archives at swynk.com 
> specifically for discussions from this list.  Can someone 
> help me out here?  I go to the site search and never am able 
> to search only the listserv archives. 
> 
> Jim Liddil
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

2002-06-06 Thread PRamatowski


Mmmm..Spew

good thread though.  Reading it and looking at our setup, I like it. 

Adult beverages of choice all around!

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


It's cool.  I spose if I would have looked it up in a book or on the
internet I could have quoted specifics, but this is all in my head so I just
spew it out.

Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


Humble pie time, I got the book out you are right, I am wrong, you learn
something new everyday. (like how to look like a fool)

S.

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 June 2002 01:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


Don't know much about firewalls do you?  Even "if" a SYN attack were to
occur because the firewall was a piece of shit, the only damage it will do
is on port 25.  A SYN attack hits all available ports.  If I am blocking all
ports except for port 25 as I "should" be doing anyway, you aren't doing
shit to my server.  SYN attacks go after all available ports.  You aren't
taking my server to the ground merely off of port 25.

Thanks for playing, please try again.

-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


A SYN attack renders the IP stack useless (if not the server), so unless
your internal users talk to it with IPX or something they will be denied.

I mentioned this as an example of why not to directly expose your mailbox
server to the world. As many people have rightly mentioned, this particular
attack is pretty much isolated by any decent firewall, and I think NT4
service pack 4 or 5  did something towards mitigating it also. However,
there are many "Un-documented Features" in operating systems, so the next
one could be just around the corner.

I wish I had never started talking about this, it is way OT now. Shall we
move on?

Symon

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 June 2002 00:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


I'm fully aware of what a SYN attack is.  That's still not going to kill
internal access though it will render external access useless.  A SYN attack
is a DoS and as Mr Scharff mentioned, if your firewall doesn't block it, you
have more troubles to worry about than that.

So... It will deny external service, but it will not deny internal. Unless
of course, your users are sitting on the public internet of course...

-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


No, a successful SYN attack will kill network connectivity totally, not just
on TCP port 25. Sure it _may_ not cause the server to crash, but it will
deny service to users.

Good explanation here:

http://www.networkcomputing.com/unixworld/security/004/004.txt.html

Symon

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 06 June 2002 21:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


That's still not going to take the server itself down...  Just the receipt
of email...

Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


 I am no expert on this, but what about a syn attack to port 25? If it
worked, it would knock out your Exchange server for anyone who has a mailbox
on it, and it is pretty easy to do.

Symon

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 06 June 2002 21:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


You're still missing the point...

If you performed what you propose, port 25 is the least of your problems.
That would wack your entire external network. 

That being the case, DMS, no DMZ, firewall, no firewall...  If something
like that happened the entire network is DoS'd not just port 25.  Your
theory is not a DoS on port 25, it is a DoS on the network itself. Unless of
course, one is lucky enough to have a OC48 or something to the internet...
:P

Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


Whoa...Don, take it easy.  You asked a question, "How can you DoS a
mailserver on

RE: Outlook question

2002-06-06 Thread PRamatowski




Russell,

What rule are you using?  If you use the rule that looks for specific words
(aaa, bbb)in the message header it should work;  I just did that and it
worked for me... I'm using OL2K.

Paul



-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook question


Hi everyone

I have an unusual request that I cannot find an answer to.  Here is my
question:

I have two SMTP addresses, [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I want to
set a rule in Outlook (both 2000 and XP) that says if an email comes in for
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
send the email to folder a.  If the email comes in for [EMAIL PROTECTED], send
the email to folder b.  So far, I can't seem to get this to work.  I tried
the rules wizard in Outlook, saying that if you see aaa in the recipient's
address, then move the mail to folder a.  No good - the email still goes to
the "in" box.  Does anyone have any ideas??  Is this really possible??

Thanks

Russell


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Determine Mail Server Version

2002-06-06 Thread PRamatowski



Tony,

I'm guessing you mean external mail, so Internet headers?

X-Originating-IP: [12.87.132.216]
From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: This is a screwed up
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:24:10 -0400 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

Received: from SONXP ([192.168.123.2]) by wolfpack.homedom.trinity.mensa.net
with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2655.55)

Subject: RE: Public Folder - drag/drop
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3

Or did I miss the mark completely?
Paul

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Determine Mail Server Version


Is there a way to determine by looking at the Message Source/Details of an
email message as to the type of email server that sent the message? In other
words was it a Exchange 5.5 or 2000. I think it is possible but looking to
prove it.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?

2002-06-05 Thread PRamatowski



Very well done!

Paul
:)

-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?


[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes;

> Maybe a faq link should be put at the bottom of all list 
> posts instead of...Huh?...what's that?...Oh, I see... Never 
> mind then...

... Aha! but then it has to slip in between the most recent post and all
the other long posts alluding to, but not actually saying, "READ THE
FAQ".

... or we have to snip the other posts and then get flamed for
overzealoussnippingtypebehaviour 'cause one can't see at a glance what
we're answering (as I have just done).

Getting back to the original question:

Type
append text to outgoing messages exchange 5.5
Into Google and hit the "I feel lucky" button.
-> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q262097

It will give you a good idea of the limitations of the built in MS
stuff.

or Type
append html to outgoing messages exchange 5.5
Into Google and hit the "I feel lucky" button.
-> http://www.slipstick.com/addins/content_control.htm

Which should sort out the question.

All the best,

Andy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?

2002-06-05 Thread PRamatowski



Andy sez...

>I remember seeing evidence somewhere that people are more likely to
>click on a link positioned at the bottom of a mail, because that is
>where they end up after they've read it.  Even a CEO should understand
>that logic? 


Maybe a faq link should be put at the bottom of all list posts instead
of...Huh?...what's that?...Oh, I see... Never mind then...

<:P)


-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?


> Out CEO wants us to add some HTML to the top of all outbound 
> messages. It is a graphic with a hotlink to our website. 10K 
> total size.

How about telling them that the in-flight magazine was wrong, and it
can't be done cheaply?  It may be the future, but the future will upset
a lot of people in the present.

How about asking him/her to compromise with a non-html link to the
website, at the bottom of the message?

I remember seeing evidence somewhere that people are more likely to
click on a link positioned at the bottom of a mail, because that is
where they end up after they've read it.  Even a CEO should understand
that logic?  

Oops ... used both "CEO" and "logic" in one sentence.

All the best,

Andy
http://google.com
(nothing to do with me : just demonstrating)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

2002-05-23 Thread PRamatowski



Must be, cuz he said not "an-ion".

-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Are you 'positive' about that?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 16:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Im not an ion, but I am a charged particle.


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b
eing used


You are right Lori.  I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new.
But I am new
compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years
and ions.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Except you're not new Mike.  You've been asking questions of this caliber
for over a year.  I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read.

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


You all are my friends here.  Thanks...

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers.

Google is your friend here.  :^)

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Yeah really...  I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[E

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-04 Thread PRamatowski



Actually, they ran out of Coors and Coors Lite..

;)

-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


Plenty of beer there.

Tech Ed this year they ran out.  Pissed a lot of folks off.



Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


A beer at MEC will be fine. :)

-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP

OK, I applied that patch...all I can say..

YESMUCH BETTER.

Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have)


Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


Well it's pretty much all around slow.  Slow opening attachments, slow
selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening
other users folders is slow even on same server.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow
connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments
after OL is already up?

If it's attachments, try Q300904.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook XP

Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to
the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k.  Whats the deal?  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000?

2002-04-24 Thread PRamatowski



Mike,  What's wrong with it?


With ~sixty-five hundred mailboxes we reject over four thousand pieces of
garbage a day. We still get grief because Trend doesn't catch *everything*.



Never mind that the user has  
[a] subscribed to all the 'jokes of the day',
[b] subscribed to 'recipes direct to your mailbox',
[c] tried to unsubscribe/remove to every piece of spam that *did* get
through,
[d] forwarded every chain letter and 'tell to everyone you know' piece of
cr@p since the beginning of time, and
[e]ETC.

Never mind the user has been told repeatedly what to do and what *not* to
do.  No matter how much you try to dumb it down and explain in terms a ten
year old can understand [1], the concepts of a changed From: account or a
changed filter string remains totally foreign to most.  The biggest
complainers don't know about, or know how to use, the Delete key...



Whatever you do, *don't* get pulled into creating server side filters for
everyone

Paul

[1] I shouldn't pick on ten year olds; they know better than to do the
stupid stuff in [a-f] !

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange
2000?


User education.

That's it.



-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000?


I have Scanmail but the content scanning service, to put it in plain
english sucks.

Any suggestions would be great.

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP

2002-02-18 Thread PRamatowski



Kim,

Chris wanted a hack to minimize OL2002 to the systray- I searched on Google
and found the link. My statement was kind of a disclaimer; I couldn't tell
by the conversation if the hack worked or not.

Here's the bit I was looking at-

[quote[ Heel mooi die Outlook functie... Ik had al een ander proggie
gedowned ervoor [/quote[ 
Euh.. Proggie? 
Dat is gewoon een registry entry 

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Preferences] 
"MinToTray"=dword:0001 

sim-pel

 Gepost door mbvisiontt Woensdag 12 December 2001 - 19:43 Score: 1
(Gemodereerd)
Ja juist ja, en dat werkt niet omdat er bij mij onder 10.0 geen outlook
staat... 


Paul

I know I'm a terrible American illiterate :(  Have some good friends in
Sittard, we are lucky enough to see them almost every year.  They are fluent
in four languages and can get by in at least three more!


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


what do you want to know?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362

Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to
minimize
it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link?

Much Thanks!

"Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
   it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved."
   William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP

2002-02-18 Thread PRamatowski

http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362

Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP

I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to minimize
it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link?

Much Thanks!

"Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
   it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved."
   William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-02-15 Thread PRamatowski


There you go assuming things  :)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


I missed that, but E

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


missed that... So what did you think of the seven shirtless Canadians on the
other side spelling out C-U-R-L-I-N-G ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


How about that guy throwing hot dogs in section 12. WOW!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday



Friggin Bob Costas!  During the opening ceremonies I literally yelled at the
tv, wishing he could hear me:
*shut_the_hell_up*

Friggin opening nite producers-  They changed cameras so much, you could
never focus on anything long enough for it to make sense...


At the end- The guy with flares strapped everywhere, spinning across the ice
and lighting the Olympic rings was pretty cool!

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


That'd be cool. Except here in the state, NBC would be most of the time
talking about the competitors backgrounds and history of the sport rather
than actually showing it.Come to think of it, they do that now.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


How interesting
To have broad sword Biathlon
Now that's a sport, eh?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday


Full contact Biathlon should be interesting as well.

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message - 
From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


> Great idea Ed!
> Full contact figure skating
> No silver or bronze.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> It's not the judges
> It's the whole screwed up system
> Nobody's impartial
> 
> Better idea
> Eliminates all bias:
> Battle to the death
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Winzenz
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> What a big joke
> Canadiens really got robbed
> Sack the bad judges!
> 
> And give a second
> Gold medal to the great pair
> To whom it belongs
> 
> Jamie Sale and
> David Pelletier are
> The real winners here!
> 
> James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
> Associate Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems, Inc.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> In figure skating
> A judging controversy
> Who'd have imagined?
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. 
> Christensen
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> Watch the Olympics
> Drink plenty of beer, and cheer
> Glad Friday is here!
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-02-15 Thread PRamatowski


missed that... So what did you think of the seven shirtless Canadians on the
other side spelling out C-U-R-L-I-N-G ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


How about that guy throwing hot dogs in section 12. WOW!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday



Friggin Bob Costas!  During the opening ceremonies I literally yelled at the
tv, wishing he could hear me:
*shut_the_hell_up*

Friggin opening nite producers-  They changed cameras so much, you could
never focus on anything long enough for it to make sense...


At the end- The guy with flares strapped everywhere, spinning across the ice
and lighting the Olympic rings was pretty cool!

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


That'd be cool. Except here in the state, NBC would be most of the time
talking about the competitors backgrounds and history of the sport rather
than actually showing it.Come to think of it, they do that now.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


How interesting
To have broad sword Biathlon
Now that's a sport, eh?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday


Full contact Biathlon should be interesting as well.

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message - 
From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


> Great idea Ed!
> Full contact figure skating
> No silver or bronze.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> It's not the judges
> It's the whole screwed up system
> Nobody's impartial
> 
> Better idea
> Eliminates all bias:
> Battle to the death
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Winzenz
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> What a big joke
> Canadiens really got robbed
> Sack the bad judges!
> 
> And give a second
> Gold medal to the great pair
> To whom it belongs
> 
> Jamie Sale and
> David Pelletier are
> The real winners here!
> 
> James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
> Associate Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems, Inc.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> In figure skating
> A judging controversy
> Who'd have imagined?
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A.
> Christensen
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> Watch the Olympics
> Drink plenty of beer, and cheer
> Glad Friday is here!
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk

RE: spam

2002-02-15 Thread PRamatowski


Clicked your hyperlink
Why is it all Japanese?
Answer my question!

Click Here to Remove?
Began getting lots of spam
Someone tell me why!

My IS blew up
disaster recovery
Oh NO Arg-Serve-IT!




-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: spam


even better just before the weekend ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 February, 2002 4:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: spam


No, but I just got this

ÅóÓÑ£º

ÄúºÃÂð£¿×î½üÎÒºÜºÃ£¡Ã¿Ìì¶¼ÊÕµ½ºÜ¶àºÜ¶àÇ®£¬µÄÈ·¸Ð¾õºÃ¼«ÁË£¡£¡
÷ÈÁ¦ÎÞÏÞµÄinternetÏÖÔÚÓÐ»ú»áÊµÏÖÎÒÃÇ°Ù Íò¸» ÎÌµÄÃÎÏë£¡£¡

ÏÖÔÚÎÒÏòÄú½éÉÜÒ»¸ö¿ÆÑ§¡¢ÏÈ½ø¡¢°²È«µÄ×¬Ç®ÏµÍ³ÍøÕ¾¡°ÐÂ Ó®  Àû¡±¡£
¡°ÐÂ Ó®  Àû¡±£ºhttp://rich4all.yeah.net

ºÃ¶àÈËÍ¨¹ýÕâÖÖÊÀ½çÁ÷ÐÐµÄ¡°¶à²ã´ÎÍøÂçÓªÏú MLM¡±
³ÉÎªÁË°ÙÍò¸»  ÎÌ£¬Õâ¾ÍÊÇ Internet µÄÁ¦Á¿£¡

²»ÒªÁßØÄ¶Ì¶Ì5·ÖÖÓÊ±¼ä£¬¼¸·ÖÖÓÍùÍù»á¸Ä±äÈËÒ»ÉúµÄÃüÔË£¡¸Ï¿ì·ÃÎÊ°É£¡²»ÒªÓÌ
Ô¥£º
¡°ÐÂ Ó®  Àû¡±£ºhttp://rich4all.yeah.net

¸Ï¿ì¼ÓÈë°É£¡Ô½ÔçÔ½ºÃ£¡¹§Ï²·¢²Æ£¡

ÄúµÄÅóÓÑ£ºÌìºÍ
QQ:67262864

¡ï Ç§Íò±ð´í¹ý»ú»á£¡£¡£¡¡ï

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 6:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: spam


Did anyone receive something similar?


Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:32:17 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C1B574D242759002B7mailserver.intas"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

--9B095B5ADSN=_01C1B574D242759002B7mailserver.intas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7

--9B095B5ADSN=_01C1B574D242759002B7mailserver.intas
Content-Type: message/delivery-status

--9B095B5ADSN=_01C1B574D242759002B7mailserver.intas
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from xnode21.serverdienst.de ([212.168.31.2]) by
mailserver.intas.
be with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
 Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:32:17 +0100
Received: (from www305@localhost)
by xnode21.serverdienst.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA23646;
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:27:22 +0100
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:27:22 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: I THINK SOMEONE STOLE YOUR PASSWORD
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2002 14:32:17.0346 (UTC)
FILETIME=[91787A20:01C1B62D]


--9B095B5ADSN=_01C1B574D242759002B7mailserver.intas--

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-02-15 Thread PRamatowski



Friggin Bob Costas!  During the opening ceremonies I literally yelled at the
tv, wishing he could hear me:
*shut_the_hell_up*

Friggin opening nite producers-  They changed cameras so much, you could
never focus on anything long enough for it to make sense...


At the end- The guy with flares strapped everywhere, spinning across the ice
and lighting the Olympic rings was pretty cool!

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


That'd be cool. Except here in the state, NBC would be most of the time
talking about the competitors backgrounds and history of the sport rather
than actually showing it.Come to think of it, they do that now.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


How interesting
To have broad sword Biathlon
Now that's a sport, eh?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday


Full contact Biathlon should be interesting as well.

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message - 
From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


> Great idea Ed!
> Full contact figure skating
> No silver or bronze.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> It's not the judges
> It's the whole screwed up system
> Nobody's impartial
> 
> Better idea
> Eliminates all bias:
> Battle to the death
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Winzenz
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> What a big joke
> Canadiens really got robbed
> Sack the bad judges!
> 
> And give a second
> Gold medal to the great pair
> To whom it belongs
> 
> Jamie Sale and
> David Pelletier are
> The real winners here!
> 
> James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
> Associate Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems, Inc.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> In figure skating
> A judging controversy
> Who'd have imagined?
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. 
> Christensen
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Haiku Friday
> 
> 
> Watch the Olympics
> Drink plenty of beer, and cheer
> Glad Friday is here!
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:

RE: Uninstall Exchange

2002-02-15 Thread PRamatowski




the Q does clean up a couple leftovers and loose ends that "Remove All"
alone never seems to catch.

IIRC a guy from PSS told me that if you follow the article, deleting
directories and the registry keys, you didn't really have to do the "Remove
all".  

I could be wrong; that was a year or so ago and we were several hours into a
*huge* Cluster-fsck that had several hours remaining.  Maybe what he really
said was "It must suck to be you right now". :)

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Uninstall Exchange


Handy article. Thanks for that.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 February 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Uninstall Exchange


>From your 5.5 cd. Run install, and the uninstall option is in there
somewhere.

Also have a look at Q259158

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Uninstall Exchange


I want to uninstall Exchange 5.5 from my test server so I can start again.
Thing is, I cant see where I can have the option to uninstall. Or is it a
case of start from scratch and rebuild the whole thing?

Any ideas?

Many thanks

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Uninstall Exchange

2002-02-15 Thread PRamatowski


>From your 5.5 cd. Run install, and the uninstall option is in there
somewhere.

Also have a look at Q259158

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Uninstall Exchange


I want to uninstall Exchange 5.5 from my test server so I can start again.
Thing is, I cant see where I can have the option to uninstall. Or is it a
case of start from scratch and rebuild the whole thing?

Any ideas?

Many thanks

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS = mailbox store

2002-02-14 Thread PRamatowski


But he might-probably-could if he were an ant.

http://www.didyouknow.com/animals/ants.htm

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS = mailbox store


It's not a question of where he grips it, it's a simple question of
weight ratios!  A five-ounce bird could not carry a one-pound coconut.


-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IS = mailbox store


What is the difference between a mailbox store and the Information Store in
E2K.

- Jason

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger

2002-01-31 Thread PRamatowski



As long as someone hasn't provided the dim-bulb with an Electro-magnetic
hat...

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger


StIcK 2.0 or the StIcK 2.2 (comes with 9" nail add-on package and mop-up
set) will solve  your problem veeery quickly.  

Alternatively, since he's not very bright, you can leave a large fork on his
table with a large label on it that reads "Don't poke your eye with this".  

S.

-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger


I dont have a lot of time for this, so it will probably get pushed to one
side now seeing as there is no "quick fix". In answer to your question 
How bright is he?   Answer - NOT VERY !

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Meline [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:31 PM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> 
> OK, Darren, it's reality time.
> 
> My questions are:
> 1. How concerned are you to relieve him of his use of MSN messenger ? 
> 2. How devious are you ? 3. What lengths are you willing to go to in 
> clipping his wings ? 4. What pull do you have over him [photos, 
> evidence, etc.] ? 5. How fast can you get savvy on GP and AD and 
> permissions ?
> 
> There are ways to put not-too-savvy people in boxes it will take them 
> months to figure their way out of.  By then, maybe he'll get promoted 
> to Marketing or Sales.  Like say to the Devil's Island office.
> 
> [And by the way, that's another question: How bright is he ?]
> 
> LOL.
> 
> 
> Brian J. Meline, MCSE, 2000MCP
> Network Support, Exchange Administrator
> Resolution, Inc.
> 
> Murphy..was an optimist.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
London Road  Henley Road 
Teynham  Paddock Wood 
Kent Kent 
ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 

Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 
Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 

All business is conducted in accordance with the company's 
terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on 
request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated 
by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of 
this company.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: average lifespan server

2002-01-24 Thread PRamatowski



I remember someone around here not too long ago was speccing for 10 yrs...
 :)

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: average lifespan server


> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 24 January 2002 10:00
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: average lifespan server
> 
> 
> how do you deal with your accounting department?  They can't 
> grasp it that a machine is worthless as a server after three years...

They don't? As much as I hate our whiny beancounters, they are actually
pretty good here at understanding computers depreciate in value to the point
of probably needing replacement after 3 years.

-- 
This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information
that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or
unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited.

The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or
policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article

2002-01-24 Thread PRamatowski


I'm surprised that no one who read the aricle ha said 

mm
Honey-pot

Would have been worth another half-point imho

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article


That was a good comeback and was easy to read. I give it a 90.


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article


If you're going to make fun of AB, you at least ought to get it right.

It had a good beat and was easy to dance to.  I give it an 85.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article


It had a good beat.
I give it an 8.



-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article


Yeah, but it says the bug is fixed with a patch from Trend.  I assume
everybody will be keeping their AV products up-to-date.

Still good article.

-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article


good article, but it appears to only affect Office Scan...I wonder if Scan
Mail has the same vulnerabilities?

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article


Hi there

If you're using Trend Micro, take a look at this article.

Thanks

Russell


http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-819807.html

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==

RE: MDBDATA Log Files

2002-01-16 Thread PRamatowski




I've seen Michèle use this in other posts, not I kinda know what it means...

::shudder::

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files


You could, in an emergency, compress some of the log files with NTFS
compression.  They compress fairly well.

This should not be the practice though.

William 


-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files


Thanks for the vote of confidence.  I planned on using PerfWiz to make the
move, circular logging is Not enabled and I schedule a full backup every
night.  I missed one day of backing up due to a failed tape causing the
drive to fill. I don't have much room for error because of the small
partition. 

Thanks,

Skip Taylor, MCSE
Network Administrator
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding


-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files


Good point.  I forgot about perfwiz.  Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a
full backup before running perfwiz.

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:42 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files


If you use perfwiz to move them, it will be ok [1].  Especially since when
perfwiz shuts down Exchange services to run, all logs will be committed to
the database anyways.  

But yes, a backup ASAP is in good order.  I don't recommend deleting the
logfiles until a good backup [2].

S.

[1] I give Skip enough credit to assume that when he meant "move the
logfiles" he was indeed talking about PerfWiz. [2] Unless Skip is using
circular logging [3], in which case it doesn't really matter. [3] *GASP*

-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files


I wouldn't move them.  Exchange expects to find them in the place they are.
Get a full backup done asap.  Do it now

-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:30 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files


I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not
get deleted and the server came to a halt.  I only have a 2gb partition for
these files.  I'll see about moving them to a different partition.  I just
did not know what was considered normal.

Thanks to all who replied,

Skip Taylor, MCSE
Network Administrator
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files


5-10 minutes?  That's terrible!  It should be every 12 minutes!

Those are transaction logs.  They are created as email traffic is created.
Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!)
then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that...

William 


-Original Message-
From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MDBDATA Log Files


How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files?  Our Exchange server
appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes.  I searched the
FAQs and Archives but did find an answer.  Here's our system.
 
Single Server
Exchange  5.5 SP 3
NT 4.0 SP 5
550 users
 
Is this normal?
Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it?  
Is some one relaying mail off my server?  If so how can I stop it?
 
Thanks, 

Skip Taylor, MCSE 
Network Administrator 
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.n

Trend and Yahoo

2002-01-14 Thread PRamatowski




Just curious if anyone else has seen this:

We all of a sudden stopped getting mail from personal Yahoo accounts, saw
this string in an antispam rule.  Not sure when it updated but the first we
heard of a problem was January 10th.  We're using E-Manager V3.5.0 build
1346.

http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

This text seems to be in any mail sent from a Yahoo personal account,
removed the text from Spam rule and we are back in business.. 

Paul

 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

2002-01-11 Thread PRamatowski



Exchange Stores on 10 year old spindles 

::SHUDDER::

Thinking about MTBF, you probably would have replaced the drives before the
got that old.
Thinking about replacing drives, I wonder about the odds of getting a *new*
drive for a five year old server.  eBay refurbished maybe...


-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


Yes Exchange is critical and it the money is given accordingly. To spec a
machine for 10(!) years would probably require us to either reduce services
elsewhere or lose a member of staff as there is a finite budget. If I need
something and can justify it with sensible business sense, I normally will
get it.

A server to last 10 years can simply not be justified.



Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems & Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 11 January 2002 15:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

I guess it depends on your situation.  If policy dictates that Exchange
Server is classified as a critical system I would think you would want to
spec the system appropriately.

Secondly, getting what you want from upper management is a skill and
requires good salesmanship and good political tactics.  I would think you
guys and gals would consider this an asset.  

If I can get a nice, big, powerful server...I'm going to do it.  

-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


Don - lack of experience - ouch!

The real world has to adapt. I could spend far too much money on a server
that should last 5-8 years. But then I would rather spend money on a server
that suits the company needs now and for the next 3-4 years and replace it
with one after that time. And if I ask for silly money now, I am not going
to get it for anything else that may need it (you never know what's around
the corner).

Its experience that is showing all of us that we don't need a server with a
spec that high. If a change occurs that should suddenly change your user
base or policies, then use it for some more money to upgrade/replace your
server. 


Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems & Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 11 January 2002 15:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

So because you cannot afford to spec a server appropriately you decide it's
best to flame everyone else that can.

If your read the original post correctly you would have seen that I was
making a recommendation.  The recommendation allows for future growth of the
database and the least amount of hardware problems.  The fact that you
consider the hardware to be overkill shows you lack of experience.  I
recommended a system that should last 5-8 years.  What good does it do to
spec a system that barely meets your current needs?  

In addition, you are chastising me for convincing higher ups to purchase a
system that is in your opinion an overkillWouldn't this be considered an
asset?  Maybe you should evaluate your own tactics with upper management. 

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec a server like that.
I guess we're the unfortunate bunch with actual "real" world budgets to work
with...  ;o)

D


-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


Ha ha ha ha LOL.

Crack pipe. Nice one Don.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


What crack pipe are you smoking out of?  Those specs are way beyond what's
necessary!

D

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right.  Your primary problem
is hardware.

This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements.

Dual Pentium III 550 +
Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config.  (2 partitions logical) 2
Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run optimizer and
move the databases and log

RE: remember server freezing

2002-01-11 Thread PRamatowski


KISS
do the nt backup.
No errors at all, or just no errors pertaining to the backup?
What about warnings?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remeber server freezing


I havent ried backing up with nt backup yet
I am doing a full backup of all the hard drives + registry + exchange dir
and IS
I was able to stop the registry backup that was scheduled after the full
backup of the hardrives and exchange.  In Event viewer it showed that I
cancelled that job otherwise I didnt see any other errors in the log.  

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remeber server freezing


Then what do you mean by "It seemed to finish one drive"? 
What are you backing up?
What the errors in the event logs?
Can you do a backup with NTBACKUP?


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remeber server freezing


yup

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remeber server freezing


Are we talking about an Exchange online backup here?


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: remeber server freezing



Ok  I think I found out why my server is freezing in the morning.  I came in
today the backup (backup Exec 8.0) was still running it seemed to finish one
drive but the other did not finish.  So  I attempted to cancel the job that
was running but it wouldnt cancel.  Then I tried to stop the backup exec
services and thats when my server locked up.  I couldnt do anything wasnt
able to log on to exchange or even log off the server.  Has anyone ever had
a problem like this with their backup software?

Thanks 
Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-09 Thread PRamatowski



Hey Ben,

Maybe some folks could use your help in cleaning out an entry from their
browser history ...

P is for Paul

-Original Message-
From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


How meaty!! Im Buying Sybari now

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Hey Kelly, nice stems!

Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: Jerry W. Hubbard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Is this pictures of you Kelly? http://kellyborndale.homestead.com/photo.html

Jerry W. Hubbard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: fix monitor
> 
> 
> 
> Who, me?  I belly dance, and that is generally done barefoot. 
> ~
> -K.Borndale
> Network Administrator
> Sybari Software
> 631.630.8569 -direct dial
> 631.439.0689 -fax
> http://www.sybari.com
> "One man's ceiling is another man's floor"
> 
> 
> |+--->
> ||  John Matteson|
> ||  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
> ||  Sent by: |
> ||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
> ||  .swynk.com   |
> ||   |
> ||   |
> ||  01/08/2002 01:17 PM  |
> ||  Please respond to|
> ||  "Exchange Discussions"   |
> ||   |
> |+--->
>   
> >-
> |
>   |   
>   
> |
>   |  To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   
>   
> |
>   |  cc:  
>   
> |
>   |  Subject: RE: fix monitor 
>   
> |
>   
> >-
> |
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Roger:
> 
>Has she flamencos danced on you with her high heels?
> 
> John Matteson; Exchange Manager
> Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
> (404) 239 - 2981
> Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing 
> because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious
> doctrine. Believe
> it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: fix monitor
> 
> 
> Dude - Ms. Baker can take you. Trust me.
> 
> And please know from experience you don't want to be on her
> "special" list.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> http://www.peregrine.com
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:18 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: fix monitor
> >
> >
> > Sorry, but you forgot to add your "Kelly Only" disclaimer, so you 
> > can't make any threats.
> >
> > If, in the future, you want to send messages for only Kelly to read, 
> > you should add the following:
> >
> > Warning: This message was intended for Kelly only. Anyone else 
> > reading this message will die.
> >
> > Of course, you should probably run it by legal and have them punch 
> > it up a bit. But then you wouldn't have to worry about anyone else 
> > on the list reading your messages for Kelly. 8-{)>
> >
> > ...Joel
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:43 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: fix monitor
> >
> >
> > That was for Kelly only...now you must die.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:39 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: f

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-08 Thread PRamatowski




  

Film at Eleven.

  


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions


I'm not wearing pants.


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions


You are absolutely right.  From now on, no more jokes.  For the rest of my
career, I promise to become a serious and prudish Exchange citizen.  I also
vow not to go postal from the lack of humor while working in the wee hours
of the morning. Thank you for setting me straight.  Let's hope others
follow.  Together we can make this list the most solemn Exchange List in the
world.

Continued success.

Jennifer Baker

-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions


Man, try to help people out and you get slammed. I thought this was supposed
to be an Exchange question and answer group and not a group that has to
knock
down or create a joke about everything that is being thrown out here. These
are real world scenarios and you obviously have way too much time on your
hands to reply to this.

Mike

- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:35 AM
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions


> What does this have to do with the Honeymooners?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> What you need to do is add the Total Ops column to your Exchange admin
> program. This will show you what mailbox is doing the most amount of
> operations on your exchange server. It is most likely a rule that is
> forwarding to the internet so you will need to login to that mailbox and
> see what is going on.
>
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> Bang!  Zoom!
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> One of these days, Alice.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: Baker, Jennifer
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> Is that an auotresponse?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> 
> I was being sarcastic.
> 
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> I know but it is a potential cause of this problem
>
>
>
>
>
> PROFITLAB
> Network Engineer
> PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> Nobody on this list does that.  If they do, I hope they don't admit it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> Also Mailbox Level Backups
>
>
>
>
>
> PROFITLAB
> Network Engineer
> PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> >I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it
> >quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT
> >Acccount.
>
> Virus scanning would cause this.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
>
> Hi,
>
> (Exchange 5.5/ SP4)
>
> my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly.
> I checked the integrit

RE: MAPI Client Problems

2002-01-08 Thread PRamatowski



I so needed that mental image first thing the morning :)

Stop thinking of the Beverly Hillbillies, *now*


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


Ponch released his Speedo around 1982 when he could no longer hold his gut
in.


-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


When was it released?

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 January 2002 13:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit
into those 28 inch waist Speedos.


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a
suggestion.

-Original Message-
From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped.  Is there anyway to see
if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ?


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox
might create that error about turning off the reminder.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work.  I
couldn't.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client

-Original Message-
From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I
mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...)

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems


My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients.  That one has been out
for about five years...
- Original Message -
From: "MATTSON, Winston AJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


Sorry Exchange Client 5.0

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


What is Outlook 5.0?  Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages
you are describing.

-Original Message-
From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I
can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the
same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open.  Other users on
the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3
or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox.

Winston

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems


And you have already tried recreating the profile?

-Original Message-
From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MAPI Client Problems


Hello All,

I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am
having with one user.  I have checked the permissions and everything
works fine through Outlook Web Access.  When they are using Outlook 5.0
/ Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are
displayed when they try to use a any of there secondary mailboxes, the
error "Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be
opened. The operation failed

RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?

2002-01-04 Thread PRamatowski



I agree 100% with the second paragraph and 99% with the third.  

That 1% comes because we are a communications company and have no choice but
to plaster many of our email addresses on TV screens or bylines on magazine
articles, newspaper stories, and so on.  We're having a big conference call
next week to try and explain paragraphs two and three to some people
throughout the company...


We use the Trend suite (3.5x for av and content management), no major
complaints.  We're just starting to look at Interscan MSS for SMTP. If
anyone using this new package would care to comment in fifty words or less,
I'd sure appreciate it!

Paul

An aside...
There's a huge diatribe here [1]
http://www.ernieshouseofwhoopass.com/nospam.html on the subject of spam and
uce. Some of it is good and some of it is bad; I used it as very rough
outline and cleaned it up a little(ok, a *lot*) it is now the lead-in for
our response to complaints.

[1] Warning before you click- some of what you see and read is the kind of
stuff that sets some people off when it appears in their inbox.  It could
also be the kind of stuff that sets some people off when it doesn't!
ymmv




-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?



I have evaluated Trend's E-Manager at one point in time.  It works ok, but
not as comprehensive or flexible as MailSweeper.  Take a look at Praetor as
well.

Content filtering is a losing battle in my opinion.  You will be chasing an
ever so mobile optimum point where you block the most amount of spam while
blocking the least amount of non-spam mail.  

The whole thing boils down to user education.  The ONLY way you can reduce
spam is to tell your users NOT to use their email accounts anywhere outside
the organization.  This means no comments to stories on CNN.com, no
forwarding of chainmails, not using their corporate email id to bid on
auctions on eBay etc. etc.  Content filtering will buy you only so much.
Without user education it'll just make spam a bigger headache for you.  Your
users will become triple frustrated when they receive spam when they know
you have a content filtering package in place, and let me reassure you that
no content filter is 100% accurate.  Your users WILL receive uce even if you
have the most aggressive filter in place.

S.



-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?


Hello all,

We are looking at getting Trend's E-Manager content filter as an add on to
our Scanmail a/v product to start screening out spam. If you have or are
using E-Manager for Scanmail could you let me know if you would recommend
for or against it and if there are any caveats I need to be aware of? I have
searched my archives of this list for E-Manager and not found much other
than some people who use it and one person who noted an issue but never
mentioned what it turned out to be due to. I also searched just on content
filtering and spam filtering among others but still didn't see all the info
I am after.

We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and ScanMail 3.5 on WinNT4 in a single
domain. Although this quarter I plan to get the domain up to Win2k so if
there are issues with Win2k I'd like to know that too. The price for
E-Manager is in our range whereas Mailsweeper etc appear not to be and I am
very happy with our Scanmail product but want to get a feel for any issues
with E-Manager.

I also am curious as to the time it takes to baby sit this. If those of you
using content scanning software (particularly E-Manager but it's probably
similar for all of them) could estimate how much time is required to sort
out the non-spam mail that gets caught in the filters and see that it is
forwarded on to the user it was intended for that would be a big help. I'm
guessing that it takes a bit of tuning of the filters to minimize that but
I've no idea if I'm talking about adding a 5 minutes a week task to my job
or a 5 hours a week (or more) task.

Thanks very much,

Ronni

*
"The pursuit of truth and beauty is a sphere of activity in which we are
permitted to remain children all our lives." -Albert Einstein
-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PR

RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think

2002-01-04 Thread PRamatowski



Yes, or even a LART. 

Whatever you call it, I'd bet it could seriously FDISK a user...

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Some Problem Someplace, I think


Would that be the new and improved STiCK?

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think


>
> Sure, with this !
>
>
http://www.airborne.net/eready/janette/store/compdetail.asp?sku=AB-SP-RD-300
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:54 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
>
>
> Is one allowed to FDISK a user?
>
> John Matteson; Exchange Manager
> Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
> (404) 239 - 2981
>
> With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
>
>
> FDISK both. Don't reinstall any OS.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 6:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Some Problem Someplace, I think
>
>
> hi list..
>
> i have a problem with either the server or the client..
> how do i fix it..?
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

2002-01-04 Thread PRamatowski

Someone hogging the can again?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

Are we there yet? I have to use the bathroom.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

I don't like it when mommy and daddy fight.

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Baker, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

This coming from a person who dresses in black every day and listens to Goth
Music.

Keep a lid on it Batman.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions

-Original Message-
From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 January 2002 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

You should see him in his nice powder blue top.  Very fetching.
JDE

 -Original Message-
From:   Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, January 04, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

For someone who has a feminine first *and* last name, I would be careful...

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

Someone explain to her about the birds and the bees.

:)

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 January 2002 13:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

And why couldn't the male carry the egg?

I'm calling HR.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

Is it a male or a female bird? That way you should keep in mind that the
female bird could carry an egg.

Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 Listowner
www.exchange-mail.org

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

It's a contained environment with no crosswinds.

No more honey for you if you stomp on my parade!!
Now, back to the show.

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

Pretty much as I understand the latest theory of bee flight but put much
better than I could have done. But it does prove that the formula
presented by Jennifer may not hold true for everything that flies.
However, is a deflated bird flying or just a projectile being shot from
some device?

Coming back to bees it is with great sadness to know that at least the
humble bumble bee in Britain is reducing in numbers, no more honey for
us!

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 January 2002 13:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

Obviously bumble bees do fly but no fixed wing study in a conventional
wind tunnel has shown how enough lift can be generated to lift the huge
mass of a bumble bee (compared to its wing size). A wide range of
studies have been done in recent years to try to understand the bee's
unique method of flying. 

Insects like the bee do not flap their wings up and down as one might
think. The movement of their wings is forward and backward. Lay your
right hand on the table (palm down) and move it to the left. That is
what the bee does as the first part of its wing beat. This movement
produces lift because your hand produces the same effect as an airplane
wing. Air moving over the top produces a low pressure because of the
greater curvature, a principal known as Bernoulli's principal. Now flip
your hand over (palm up) and return it to its original position. 

Computer studies shown that the timing of the flip is critical. The wake
of the forward stroke allows the wing to recapture energy as the wing is
moved back. There is a surge of forces on the wing as this happens which
provides great lift at minimal energy. Dr. Adrian Thomas of Oxford
University says, "The whole system is a lot more complicated than we
thought." A lot rema

RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think

2002-01-04 Thread PRamatowski



Sure, with this !

http://www.airborne.net/eready/janette/store/compdetail.asp?sku=AB-SP-RD-300

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think


Is one allowed to FDISK a user?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think


FDISK both. Don't reinstall any OS.

-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 6:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Some Problem Someplace, I think


hi list..

i have a problem with either the server or the client..
how do i fix it..?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from a troll to a Yoda

2002-01-03 Thread PRamatowski



...those. Those what, for ghods sake?

Paul
http://trollalert.com/TheHand/ [1]

[1] Found on a Google search on Trolls :)

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question from a troll to a Yoda


no I have always been like this you just have to get to know me first.  Im
one of those

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question from a troll to a Yoda


We just need to all stop answering his troll questions, and he will go away.
I'm about 99% convinced that Richard is another Hanji.  Feed a troll, he
will keep asking questions.  Ignore a troll, he will go away.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question from a troll to a Yoda

um... is it really not obvious?

1) There are too many recipients in the email (that's the TO: line)

2) The email is larger than the message limit (that means it's too big)

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
"Each time a person stands up for an idea, or acts to improve the lot of
others,
or strikes out against injustice, (s)he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope,
and
crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring,
those
ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of
oppression
and resistance." --Robert F. Kennedy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from a troll to a Yoda


Can any Yoda tell me what this error or NDR means. I have seen about 8 of
them today.

1.) A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error.

553 Too many recipients in the mail, should less than 100
The message that caused this notification was:


2.) A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error.

12107454 bytes exceeds server limit of 512

The message that caused this notification was:




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: recipients

2002-01-03 Thread PRamatowski


It depends.

http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&q=exchange+%22maximum+number+of+re
cipients%22


Paul
Oooh, Titanium! A New StIcK, thanks to William's Lefkovics' sig...
http://www.airborne.net/eready/janette/store/compdetail.asp?sku=AB-SP-RD-300



-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recipients


Is there a max amount of recipients you can send to through exchange or is
it unlimited.  My impression is that the max is 254 is this true.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-03 Thread PRamatowski





or he might fry his testicals...

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Your A+ teacher probably doesn't know, never having seen it in the book.

However, had he ever, ever, even ONCE opened any product with a CRT made in
the last 30 years, he would have seen the "Warning: Stuff in here will KILL
you." label - it's tough to miss.

And yeah, there are user serviceable parts in there; depending on the user.
But if you've been able to fool him into asking you for technical advice, I
would probably suggest he put those child safety plugs in his household
electrical recepticals.

> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:36 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: fix monitor
> Subject: RE: fix monitor
> 
> 
> I did learn one thing 
> 1. I really didnt know that you could get shocked by a 
> monitor after its
> unpluged.  My A+ teacher never taught us that I guess thats 
> why we never
> really opened a monitor to fix one.  
> 
> Now Im going to tell my cousin to fix his own 21 inch dell 
> monitor at his
> own risk.
> 
> Oh yeah now I know why its so damn hard to open the damn 
> monitor as well.
> 
> lol 
> Thanks
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: fix monitor
> 
> 
> I realize I am late to this discussion, as I have read many catapult
> references, however I don't think it was addressed. I am 
> relatively new
> To the Exchange World, only a year and a half working with 
> it. But I have
> Been involved with Networking and Computers in general for the last 12
> years. I got my start (as probably did everyone here) working 
> on hardware.
> 
> Richard, I can tell you there are most certainly no user 
> serviceable parts
> In a monitor. And Opening one up can be Fatal. The Flyback 
> Capacitor Can
> hold a charge of several thousand volts for years. There is 
> more than enough
> Voltage there to severely burn you, if not kill you. Like 
> everyone one else
> Here has said, it's cheaper to buy a new one, then get an old 
> one fixed.
> Unless.You live near a High School that has a Vocational Education
> Program that specializes in Electronics. These kinds of 
> schools Will usually
> Fix the equipment at no charge save for parts.
> 
> Just An idea.
> 
> Ken
> 
> Kenneth Davis
> IT Manager
> American Wood Moulding, LLC
> 
> "For a moment, nothing happened. 
> Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: fix monitor
> 
> 
> 
> for all u hardware/monitor geniuses out there do u know a 
> good place on the
> web to tell me how to open/fix a monitor?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-03 Thread PRamatowski


http://www.cranknet.com/dumb.html

-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Can you post that somewhere (or EMail it to me) - I'd like to see it...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Tullis
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: ExchangeList@swynk
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Ahem I happen to have a copy sitting right here in front of me 

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


What of the live ones?  Gah - I still remember that from a couple years
ago.
Movie floating around that showed 2 guys that tempted a squirrel onto a
clay
pidgeon catapult.  When the squirrel climbed on, Zingo.  They let him
go.
Flew quite a ways.  Cruel, but it was funny to see.  I wonder if I still
have that movie around somewhere.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor

I prefer frozen squirrels for catapult ammo.


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Here we use broken monitors for catapult ammo.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: fix monitor


I used to have them fixed by an outfit for my customers. The firm was in
Texas. Start up north and start driving south. They are somewhere in
between.

- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: RE: fix monitor


> I was going to tell him to draw a bath first.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
> problems."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin 
> Blackstone
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: fix monitor
>
>
> Keep your hands out. The voltage is real high in there. It usually 
> costs more to fix, than to replace. What kind of monitor is it?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: fix monitor
>
>
>
>
> for all u hardware/monitor geniuses out there do u know a good place 
> on
the
> web to tell me how to open/fix a monitor?
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Incomin

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-03 Thread PRamatowski


A fish taco?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


If everything taste like chicken, what does chicken taste like?

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Tastes just like chicken when you cook them correctly...err...from what I
hear.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


I prefer frozen squirrels for catapult ammo.


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor


Here we use broken monitors for catapult ammo.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: fix monitor


I used to have them fixed by an outfit for my customers. The firm was in
Texas. Start up north and start driving south. They are somewhere in
between.

- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: RE: fix monitor


> I was going to tell him to draw a bath first.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> problems."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
> Blackstone
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: fix monitor
>
>
> Keep your hands out. The voltage is real high in there. It usually
> costs more to fix, than to replace. What kind of monitor is it?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: fix monitor
>
>
>
>
> for all u hardware/monitor geniuses out there do u know a good place
> on
the
> web to tell me how to open/fix a monitor?
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: suppressing R e a d r e c e i p t s

2002-01-02 Thread PRamatowski



At our office, that was tried (once). Right about here though,


 since a lot of them are simply revisions of earlier attachments that
the manager won't care about.


something bad happened

That one user really has that much impact on the whole system?

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: suppressing R e a d r e c e i p t s


Thanks, David.  Grinningshark will almost certainly solve our problem.  What
a great product.


Serdar, I didn't know that.  Thanks.  Unfortunately, O2K2 is not on the
horizon for us.  As for your Exch question, yes it's worthwhile.  We can
move all the attachments to low-cost storage (our SAN has a bunch of cheap
4x73GB disk arrays for file shares versus faster 4x18GB arrays for
Exchange).  Also, by getting the attachments out of the way we're improving
Exchange's performance.  The nightly database cleanup already takes about
eight hours.  Plus, we expect that the assistant will be able to delete at
least 40% of the attachments she finds, since a lot of them are simply
revisions of earlier attachments that the manager won't care about.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)

2001-12-14 Thread PRamatowski




Well, the reason I'm drinking yours is cuz you aren't here. If y'all ever do
show up around here, I'd treat you to your own...

India Pale Ale
http://www.legendbrewing.com/about_us.html

Was (and will be again) a decent webpage; unfortunately under major
construction :(

Whups, after quittin' time and nothings broke  See Ya!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


um, thanks, I think


ps.  what's an IPA?

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial. 
-


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


You'll feel better after I drink your IPA...

$60 for beer and $40 for the cabs (my treat tonight)
;)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


IC.  I plead Friday.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Things a Mother Learns:  VCR's do not eject Peanut Butter & Jelly sandwiches
even though TV commercials show that they do. 
-


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


Like so?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


??  

5.1 Q: Where's the rest of the FAQ?

A: The other 90% of this version of the FAQ is under development - We will
accept submissions as long as you put "FAQ" in the subject line.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise my hands 
-

I think the "Martin Blackstone Attachment Nazi List" needs to be added
to the FAQ.  Who here can make that happen?


> Basics
> vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB;exe
> 
> Full List VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;
> HLP;HTA;INF;INS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;
> PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)

2001-12-14 Thread PRamatowski



oIc...



-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


No, like send it to SWINC with the word FAQ in the title.

Or send it to me off-list with your credit card information, and I'll
hand it to them across a table full of chili, beer, and um... well,
it doesn't just matter after that, does it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Posted At: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:14 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)
Subject: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


Like so?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


??  

5.1 Q: Where's the rest of the FAQ?

A: The other 90% of this version of the FAQ is under development - We
will accept submissions as long as you put "FAQ" in the subject line.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise my hands 
-

I think the "Martin Blackstone Attachment Nazi List" needs to be added
to the FAQ.  Who here can make that happen?


> Basics
> vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB;exe
> 
> Full List VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;
> HLP;HTA;INF;INS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;
> PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)

2001-12-14 Thread PRamatowski


You'll feel better after I drink your IPA...

$60 for beer and $40 for the cabs (my treat tonight)
;)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


IC.  I plead Friday.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Things a Mother Learns:  VCR's do not eject Peanut Butter & Jelly sandwiches
even though TV commercials show that they do. 
-


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)


Like so?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


??  

5.1 Q: Where's the rest of the FAQ?

A: The other 90% of this version of the FAQ is under development - We will
accept submissions as long as you put "FAQ" in the subject line.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise my hands 
-

I think the "Martin Blackstone Attachment Nazi List" needs to be added
to the FAQ.  Who here can make that happen?


> Basics
> vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB;exe
> 
> Full List VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;
> HLP;HTA;INF;INS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;
> PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FAQ (Was Attachment Nazi)

2001-12-14 Thread PRamatowski


Like so?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


??  

5.1 Q: Where's the rest of the FAQ?

A: The other 90% of this version of the FAQ is under development - We will
accept submissions as long as you put "FAQ" in the subject line.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise my hands 
-

I think the "Martin Blackstone Attachment Nazi List" needs to be added
to the FAQ.  Who here can make that happen?


> Basics
> vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB;exe
> 
> Full List VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;
> HLP;HTA;INF;INS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;
> PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Attachment Nazi

2001-12-14 Thread PRamatowski



Well yeah but why u no answer my question? 
Two IPA toasts coming up!

Paul
---
Christmas Carols for the Psychiatrically Challenged
SCHIZOPHRENIA: Do you Hear What I Hear?
MULTIPLE PERSONALITY DISORDER: We Three Queens Disoriented Are
---

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


Exactly!!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


How's this:  

ADE Possible virus
ADP Possible virus
ASX Possible virus
BAS Possible virus
BAT Possible virus
...   etc.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Beware of geeks bearing gifts. 
-


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi



Regarding this most excellent list-

I've found the following info (some of the file types are associated with
more than one application; I've listed only the one(s) that would seem to be
problematic.

If someone could correct errors and fill in the blanks I'll gladly hoist an
IPA in their honor next chance I get (about 2 hours from now).

Cheers,
Paul


ADE MS access Project extension
ADP Faxworks modemsetup file
ASX Windows media stream redirector file or video file
BAS Basic
BAT Batch file
BIN Binary file
CHM Compiled HTML Help
CMD Command file
COM Command file
CPL Control Panel
CRT Certificate file, 
DLL Dynamic link library
EML MS outlook Express mail
EXE executeable
HIV 
HLP MS Help file
HTA Hypertext Application
INF Setup file
IPL 
ISP Internet communication settings
JS  Java script source code
JSE jscript encoded script file
JTD Ichitaro (Japanese word procesor)
MSC ms "C" makefile
MSG Mail message file
MSI Windows installer file
MSP Windows installer patch
MST Windows SDK setup script
NS  
OCX MS OLE control extension
OFT MS Outlook item template
OVL Programfile- overlay
PCD p-code compiled test scripts
PIF Windows program information file
PLX 
SCR Screen Saver
SCT Windows script component
SH  Unix shell script
SHB Document shortcut filel
SHS Shell scrap object file
SYS System Configuration file
VB  Visual Basic
VBE Visual Basic
VBS Visual Basic
VSS Visio Stencil
VST Visio Template
VXD Virtual Device Driver
WSC Windows Script Component
WSF Windows Script File
WSH Windows script Host Settings file




-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Attachment Nazi


>From you .. I save these kinda things ;)

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--

- Original Message - 
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


> Nice list!! Where did you get that??
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Attachment Nazi
> 
> 
> I suggest as a start:
> 
> Basics
> vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB;exe
> 
> Full List VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;
> HLP;HTA;INF;INS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;
> PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;
> 
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP Exchange
> Exchange2000 List owner
> www.exchange-mail.org
> www.sharepointserver.com
> --
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:28 PM
> Subject: Attachment Nazi
> 
> 
> > I will only be allowing these attachment types through our gateway
> starting
> > the end of January.
> >
> > No attachment for you!
> >
> > BMP;DOC;GIF;GZ;JPEG;JPG:HTM;HTML;MSG;PDF;PPT;RTF;TAR;TXT;XLS;Z;ZIP;
> >
> > Any comments from "The List"?  (Except for Mr. Seielstad...)
> >
> > Jennifer Baker
> > http://www.fluke.com
> > http://www.flukenetworks.com
> > "Keeping your world up and running."
> >
> > _
> > List

RE: Attachment Nazi

2001-12-14 Thread PRamatowski



Regarding this most excellent list-

I've found the following info (some of the file types are associated with
more than one application; I've listed only the one(s) that would seem to be
problematic.

If someone could correct errors and fill in the blanks I'll gladly hoist an
IPA in their honor next chance I get (about 2 hours from now).

Cheers,
Paul


ADE MS access Project extension
ADP Faxworks modemsetup file
ASX Windows media stream redirector file or video file
BAS Basic
BAT Batch file
BIN Binary file
CHM Compiled HTML Help
CMD Command file
COM Command file
CPL Control Panel
CRT Certificate file, 
DLL Dynamic link library
EML MS outlook Express mail
EXE executeable
HIV 
HLP MS Help file
HTA Hypertext Application
INF Setup file
IPL 
ISP Internet communication settings
JS  Java script source code
JSE jscript encoded script file
JTD Ichitaro (Japanese word procesor)
MSC ms "C" makefile
MSG Mail message file
MSI Windows installer file
MSP Windows installer patch
MST Windows SDK setup script
NS  
OCX MS OLE control extension
OFT MS Outlook item template
OVL Programfile- overlay
PCD p-code compiled test scripts
PIF Windows program information file
PLX 
SCR Screen Saver
SCT Windows script component
SH  Unix shell script
SHB Document shortcut filel
SHS Shell scrap object file
SYS System Configuration file
VB  Visual Basic
VBE Visual Basic
VBS Visual Basic
VSS Visio Stencil
VST Visio Template
VXD Virtual Device Driver
WSC Windows Script Component
WSF Windows Script File
WSH Windows script Host Settings file




-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Attachment Nazi


>From you .. I save these kinda things ;)

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--

- Original Message - 
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi


> Nice list!! Where did you get that??
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Attachment Nazi
> 
> 
> I suggest as a start:
> 
> Basics
> vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB;exe
> 
> Full List VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;
> HLP;HTA;INF;INS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;
> PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;
> 
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP Exchange
> Exchange2000 List owner
> www.exchange-mail.org
> www.sharepointserver.com
> --
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:28 PM
> Subject: Attachment Nazi
> 
> 
> > I will only be allowing these attachment types through our gateway
> starting
> > the end of January.
> >
> > No attachment for you!
> >
> > BMP;DOC;GIF;GZ;JPEG;JPG:HTM;HTML;MSG;PDF;PPT;RTF;TAR;TXT;XLS;Z;ZIP;
> >
> > Any comments from "The List"?  (Except for Mr. Seielstad...)
> >
> > Jennifer Baker
> > http://www.fluke.com
> > http://www.flukenetworks.com
> > "Keeping your world up and running."
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesea

RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig

2001-12-14 Thread PRamatowski



Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool [1]



Regards,
Me;)
http://www.dangerousdaze.com/faq/images/dickhead.gif [2]

[1] ThE sTiCk, etc.
[2] The only one I could find that I would post in a public forum.[3]
[3] This one anyway 


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig


What is a LART? Is that like a whipping post?
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig


> Mike,
>
> If you want to disrespect me, that's fine. Bring it on. I've got your LART
> right here pal.
>
> But you'd be well advised to treat a lady, such as Mrs. Hunter with proper
> deference.
>
> Chris
> --
> Chris Scharff
> Senior Sales Engineer
> MessageOne
> If you can't measure, you can't manage!
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:22 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
> >
> >
> > That's funny seeing how you are commenting on this.  It looks
> > as if you have been called everything already.  I'm sorry did
> > I hurt your feelings?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:17 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
> >
> >
> > Mike, friendly advice.  Do yourself a big favor and read the
> > list for a few weeks before you decide who is a smartass, a
> > wiseass, a dickhead, a moron, a troll, a goddess, etc.  Some
> > of the people you may define as smartass, the rest of us
> > might define as guru with an edge.  I'll take the edge as
> > long as I get the guru knowledge along with it.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:08 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
> >
> >
> > Not long.  I actually joined to get some useful information
> > and aslo give some.  I didn't join to compete with certain
> > people on right answers.
> >
> > Michael Woodruff
> > System Administrator
> > inChord Communications Inc.
> > A group of communications companies providing clients
> > unlimited visibility
> > 614.543.6405
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:55 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
> >
> >
> > Mike, exactly how long have you been on the list?
> >
> > Tom.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:47 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
> >
> > This guy sure is a smart ass.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:35 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
> >
> >
> > Hmmm. I think I covered that in my review of Antigen 6.0. ;)
> >
> > Chris
> > --
> > Chris Scharff
> > Senior Sales Engineer
> > MessageOne
> > If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:52 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You can use the Sophos engine with Antigen.
> > > ~
> > > -K.Borndale
> > > Network Administrator
> > > Sybari Software
> > > 631.630.8569 -direct dial
> > > 631.439.0689 -fax
> > > http://www.sybari.com
> > > "One man's ceiling is another man's floor"
> > >
> > >
> > > |+--->
> > > ||  Chris Scharff|
> > > ||   > > ||  .com>|
> > > ||  Sent by: |
> > > ||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
> > > ||  .swynk.com   |
> > > ||   |
> > > ||   |
> > > ||  12/14/2001 11:22 AM  |
> > > ||  Please respond to|
> > > ||  "Exchange Discussions"   |
> > > ||   |
> > > |+--->
> > >
> > > >-
> > > --
> > > --

RE: Free/Busy & Performance

2001-12-05 Thread PRamatowski



 We publish 12 months and update every 15 minutes and never really noticed
any difference after changing.

 ymmv.  



-Original Message-
From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Free/Busy & Performance


We are considering implementing implementing a policy to globally increase
the amount of Calendar free/busy data published by Outlook.  The problem is
that we require our resources (meeting rooms etc) and those who directly
book them to have this setting at 12 months so our only option for a global
setting would be 12 months as well.  I have read articles in the past
indicating that boosting the Publish Free/Busy Info setting too high may
have perforance impacts but I am not sure how real this potential is.  

Has anyone else globally increased this number to 10 or 12 months and seen a
real performance hit or are the warnings in the articles purely based on a
theoretical performance impact?

Thanks
Dan Ferneyhough 
Capital Health Region 
Information Systems 
Phone: (250) 370-8012 
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: disaster debriefing

2001-11-30 Thread PRamatowski



Kevin Shoots, Kevin scores :)



-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing


MSKB's main site in s Redmond WA, and googles is in mountain View CA.

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 6:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing




anyone know where MSKB and Google are?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing


anyone know what event viewer id # 4093 is?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: disaster debriefing

2001-11-30 Thread PRamatowski




anyone know where MSKB and Google are?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing


anyone know what event viewer id # 4093 is?


-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing


Well it was a 10G file, which is about 81920 megabits.  Let's say you're
getting 60MBps transfer rate on your 100Mbps LAN (since it's nighttime,
things are pretty quiet), that should take about 25 minutes.  Lemme know if
my math is wrong.

-Yanek.


> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> 
> 
> Which means nothing. Try it out yourself - cut and paste, 
> drag and drop,
> xcopy, whatever - a large file, and while its copying, look 
> at the byte
> count on the destination drive. That's the FIRST thing done 
> in the copy
> process.
> 
> You ever time doing a copy of a 20GB file across a LAN??? It 
> takes a while.
> A LONG while.
> 
> There is no need for retraining this person - even my 3 year 
> old can say
> "Would you like fries with that?"
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> http://www.peregrine.com
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:10 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> > 
> > 
> > He did wait an hour...  And he's confident the copy was 
> > complete - same byte
> > count on both the network drive and the local drive.
> > 
> > -Yanek.
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:42 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sounds like he got impatient and didn't wait for the database 
> > > to finish
> > > being copied back to exchsrvr\mdbdata from the network share 
> > > - which needs
> > > to complete before you get your dos prompt back.
> > > 
> > > After he killed ESEutil, he could've also copied it back 
> > manually and
> > > renamed back to priv.edb instead of tape restore.  Then, the 
> > > defrag effort
> > > would not have been in vain.
> > > 
> > > Louise
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:27 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> > > 
> > > He followed the KB article, whatever it was.  Services were 
> > > down.  I think
> > > he followed all the "right" procedures.  The temp file was on 
> > > a network
> > > drive that had plenty of room.  The defragged temp database 
> > > exists on the
> > > temp drive and is whole.  That's how he figures it freed 3.5 gigs.
> > > 
> > > -Yanek.
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The utility is dangerous in the wrong hands.  It can take a 
> > > > very, very, very
> > > > long time to run.  It also gets very snitty when you don't 
> > > > have enough room
> > > > on the HD (or network share) to create the temp file that is 
> > > > part of the
> > > > defrag processWhere did he attempt to create the temp 
> > > > fileon the
> > > > same drive that is almost full?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > And how is he enjoying his time at home these days?
> > > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: disaster debriefing
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, so we had a disaster the other day.  Co-Worker of mine 
> > > ran eseutil
> > > > against the private IS to free up some disk space.  We were 
> > > > at about 95%
> > > > capacity on the drive, and it would creep up to about 98% 
> > > > before the nightly
> > > > incrementals, which brought it back down.  Now, I'm not 
> > > positive what
> > > > command he ran, but apparently it cleared about 3.5 gigs out 
> > > > of the IS.
> > > > Right before eseutil exited, however, it apparently "hung" 
> > > > waiting for a
> > > > command prompt.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm a little fuzzy as to what happened after this.  I think 
> > > > he tried to
> > > > reboot, and then the IS didn't come up -- he got some errors, 
> > > > looked them up
> > > > in the KB to very little avail.  So when I got in at 9 the 
> > > > next morning,
> > > > mail was down.  He was still there.
> >

RE: Aborted Backup Procedure

2001-11-15 Thread PRamatowski



John,

The stop/start usually takes care of it, though we had to reboot last
Wednesday...
Only happens maybe once every 3-4 months so we haven't really worried about
it.  


I had gone to EX Admin->Server Properties->Services and added the Omniback
II Inet service to the list of Monitored Services so maybe we'd get an alert
or something, but the service is never stopped, just gone screwy
There's never anything in the event logs, I can't think of what logging to
turn up to even catch anything.


Paul

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Aborted Backup Procedure


It was either the stop and restart of the OmniNet II service, or the reboot
of the Exchange server that cleared the problem.

The registry key was only set if a restore was in progress, not a backup.

Thanks to those of you who responded.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral;
begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil,
it multiplies it... Through violence you may murder the hater, but you do
not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate...Returning
violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night
already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out hate; only love can do
that. -- Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Aborted Backup Procedure



Have you tried stopping/starting the Omninet service on the exchange server?

Paul

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Aborted Backup Procedure


I am using HP's OmniBack backup process on the company's Exchange server.
The process hung and the backup system had to be rebooted.

When we tried restarting the job, the Exchange server blocked the attempt
with these error messages:

[Major] From: OB2BAR@"MSExchange"  Time: 11/14/01 1:25:02 PM
[153:9] Connect to Exchange Server failed.

[Critical] From: OB2BAR@ "MSExchange"  Time: 11/14/01 1:25:02 PM
A system or BackOffice error has occurred.
Exchange Server reported error number: 0xc80001f9.
Message: 'Backup is already active.'.

[Critical] From: BSM@"EXG02 - Daily"  Time: 11/14/01 13:26:11
None of the Disk Agents completed successfully.
Session has failed.



Does anyone know if there is a flag in the registry that gets set while a
backup is in progress, or a KB articles that tells me how to fix it?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Aborted Backup Procedure

2001-11-14 Thread PRamatowski

Have you tried stopping/starting the Omninet service on the exchange server?

Paul

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Aborted Backup Procedure

I am using HP's OmniBack backup process on the company's Exchange server.
The process hung and the backup system had to be rebooted.

When we tried restarting the job, the Exchange server blocked the attempt
with these error messages:

[Major] From: OB2BAR@"MSExchange"  Time: 11/14/01 1:25:02 PM
[153:9] Connect to Exchange Server failed.

[Critical] From: OB2BAR@ "MSExchange"  Time: 11/14/01 1:25:02 PM
A system or BackOffice error has occurred.
Exchange Server reported error number: 0xc80001f9.
Message: 'Backup is already active.'.

[Critical] From: BSM@"EXG02 - Daily"  Time: 11/14/01 13:26:11
None of the Disk Agents completed successfully.
Session has failed.

Does anyone know if there is a flag in the registry that gets set while a
backup is in progress, or a KB articles that tells me how to fix it?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook name completion question

2001-10-31 Thread PRamatowski

only 8 hours?

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook name completion question

open the address book and go to tools > options. You could disable the name
checking/autocomplete *features*. It's in the advanced email options
somewhere under tools > options.  Just remember to have an 8 hour brown-bag
session for your end users that covers the ALT+k function.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook name completion question

I have a users that has upgraded from Office 2000 to XP.  No problems but
now he has an issue where we have a "Joel User1" in our GAL and a "Joel
User2" in his contact folder.  When creating a new e-mail he enters "Joel"
and then heads over and composes the rest of the e-mail.  Outlook will
auto-complete the rest of the e-mail address with "Joel User2" from his
contact folder.  After hitting send he notices that it went to the wrong
Joel as he wanted the Joel from our GAL and not from his contact folder.
He's asked if there is a way to set Outlook to check the GAL then his
Contact folder for names (currently it checks the contacts folder then the
GAL).  In Outlook 2000 you could do this under Tools|Services|Addressing
Tab.  I can no longer find this in the latest Outlook.  Does anybody know
where Microsoft moved this feature?

Jeremy Newell
Systems Technician

Inscriber Technology Corporation
T.519.570.9111
F.519.570.9140 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic Kinda

2001-10-31 Thread PRamatowski



http://www.netgain.co.nz/egypt.htm
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/close/gi45/egypt/papyrus.htm

Main Entry: sta·tio·nery 
Pronunciation: 'stA-sh&-"ner-E
Function: noun
Etymology: stationer
Date: circa 1688
1 : materials (as paper, pens, and ink) for writing or typing
2 : letter paper usually accompanied with matching envelopes 



-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic Kinda




Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for
outlook 2000.  I want to make some fancy email BABY!!

Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NTBackup

2001-10-26 Thread PRamatowski



sixty servers plus
only one acted this way
i'm so happy now

Mike you are the man
difference excapes me now
but I'll reason why
 
Ahhh screw the haiku,[1]
It worked like a friggin champ
I can ditch CA![2]


[1] I'm not in Japan so for now it's two syllables :-P
[2]
 Woo-Hoo!
   

   
 Excellent...
   


Thanks *lots*[2]
Paul


-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NTBackup


Holy Haiku, Batman! Excellent job! And very nice footnote, too!

In your batch file, try separating out each of the drive letters on their
own line and using the /a switch to append to the same tape.

Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NTBackup

2001-10-26 Thread PRamatowski



new bat file in place
thank you mike for the reply
scheduled time awaits



Iron Chef Haiku [1],[2] 
Subtle textures not seen here [3],[4]
And no steeenking rhymes [5]

[1] *Was* going to be "Iron Chef Crap Haiku"  
[2] in Japanese, the word "haiku" has 3 syllables = ha-i-ku  deal with it
 -Michèle Sharik, October 26, 2001

[3] Now that all you would-be poets are mastering the simpler aspects (for
the
most part) of the haiku form, perhaps it's time to introduce the more subtle
textures that differentiate an actual haiku from merely a pithy 17 syllable
sentence with a couple of internal carriage returns. 
  -Andy Webb, October 16, 2001

[4] My haiku is full of pith.  I need work adding subtle textures to my
footnotes as well. 
  Paul Ramatowski, October 26, 2001

[5] A Japanese lyric verse form having three unrhymed lines
  -Richard Tener, October 16, 2001
 



Going to see an ape
Known as India Pale Ale
Just coincidence?



-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NTBackup


Holy Haiku, Batman! Excellent job! And very nice footnote, too!

In your batch file, try separating out each of the drive letters on their
own line and using the /a switch to append to the same tape.

Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NTBackup


Iron Chef Haiku [1] 
Subtle textures not seen here
And no steeenking rhymes

ntbackup rules
I should say in most cases
Small vexing problem

on just one server
all drives don't go on one tape
space not the issue

when each drive is done
wants new tape for the next drive
command line follows

ntbackup backup c: d: e: ds \\server is \\server /v /r /b /e /l
"d:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal

/v verify
/r restricts access
/b backs up local registry
/e log includes exceptions only
/l backup log filename
/hc:on Hardware compression on
/t normal (full) backup



not using the slash-a
backup acts like it is there
three drives specified


/a
Causes backup sets to be added or appended after the last backup set on the
tape. When /a is not specified, the program  overwrites previous data. When
more than one drive is specified but /a is not, the program overwrites the
contents of the  tape with the information from the first drive selected and
then appends the backup sets for the remaining drives.


Exchange alone works
Combination doesn't work
Drives alone bite too

NTSP6
Ex55Sp4
hotfixes as well


makes no difference
running comand line or bat
any help out there?

Thanks,
Paul

[1] in Japanese, the word "haiku" has 3 syllables = ha-i-ku  deal with it
 -Michèle Sharik, October 26, 2001

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NTBackup

2001-10-26 Thread PRamatowski


Iron Chef Haiku [1] 
Subtle textures not seen here
And no steeenking rhymes

ntbackup rules
I should say in most cases
Small vexing problem

on just one server
all drives don't go on one tape
space not the issue

when each drive is done
wants new tape for the next drive
command line follows

ntbackup backup c: d: e: ds \\server is \\server /v /r /b /e /l
"d:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal

/v verify
/r restricts access
/b backs up local registry
/e log includes exceptions only
/l backup log filename
/hc:on Hardware compression on
/t normal (full) backup



not using the slash-a
backup acts like it is there
three drives specified


/a
Causes backup sets to be added or appended after the last backup set on the
tape. When /a is not specified, the program  overwrites previous data. When
more than one drive is specified but /a is not, the program overwrites the
contents of the  tape with the information from the first drive selected and
then appends the backup sets for the remaining drives.


Exchange alone works
Combination doesn't work
Drives alone bite too

NTSP6
Ex55Sp4
hotfixes as well


makes no difference
running comand line or bat
any help out there?

Thanks,
Paul

[1] in Japanese, the word "haiku" has 3 syllables = ha-i-ku  deal with it
 -Michèle Sharik, October 26, 2001

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Warning labels-Was RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseuti l

2001-10-24 Thread PRamatowski

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~laura/humor/warning_labels.html

http://www.mlaw.org/news4.htm (eww)

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil

I think warning labels are useful.  I'm thinking about getting a fork and
putting the warning "don't stick this in your eye" on it and giving it to
people I don't like.

S.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil

Yes. Those are the same people for whom the warning labels are placed on
EVERYTHING. Those that don't make it out of the house alive in the
morning thin the heard. Though I must admit it's not been working as
well as it did before the warning labels. 

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil

Ahhh. But many people out there follow the "If I shouldn't run them then
they wouldn't have included them" school of thought on things like that.

-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil

Not to pile on or anything, but I distinctly remember a session at
MEC2001
that stated "do not" run them old utils. (it's.. in.. one.. of.. these..
slides.. here.. someplace..  oh pooh, I can never find anything in this
purse..). Their still included, of course. But they are not to be run
without the strict guidance of PSS.

-Original Message-
From: Antony Pautz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil

Help !

Has anybody managed  to recover an information store after Eseutil has
crashed.

I was busy defragging the private information store and the whole
process
went perfectly until the point where it copies the temp files over the
existing files. It copied priv1.edb over succesfully and then crashed
leaving me with the undefragmented priv1.stm.

I tried to copy the temp .stm across manually and then renamed it and
performed a whole host of checks with eseutil and isinteg but the server
just doesn't want to know about it.

And of course, who didn't check to see that they had a full backup
before
starting the defrag ?

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Antony

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Opinion on Backups

2001-10-19 Thread PRamatowski



BE 8.6  (What we started with, no previous BE to compare)...
Quantum DLT8000   (40/80)

Backup completed on 10/18/2001 at 9:50:35 PM.
Backed up 1 Exchange Server store(s)
Processed 20,532,446,196 bytes in  49 minutes and  53 seconds.
Throughput rate: 392.5 MB/min

different days give different rates, but is always between 390-400MB/Min

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups


My exchange backups got much faster when I upgraded to BE 8.6.

-Original Message-
From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Opinion on Backups


Backup exec 7 something to local 35/70 Dlt tape drive.

Backup completed on 10/18/01 at 12:55:01 AM.
Backed up 1 Exchange Server store(s)
Processed 25,858,966,324 bytes in  1 hour,  23 minutes, and  18 seconds.
Throughput rate: 296.051 MB/min


Michael Semiglia



-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups


15 hours doesnt suprise me in the least.  Ours was 22, it was getting ugly,
and backup exec is ugly.  Its probably great for one server or two but not
much more in my opinion.

So you liking that LTO SAN combo?  you using the IBM shark by chance?  We
piloted that hardware, it was really nice but about 100k$ more then we
wanted to spend.  We ended up going with commvault/spectralogic combo.  We
will probably add SAN next budget year.

> 15 hours?! Holy crap! You do realise that it is likely going to take 
> that long to restore as well right?
> 
> We are using a local 35/70gb DLT library from IBM and it takes us 
> about 2 hours max to backup a 35gb store. Using out new SAN with the 
> same 35/70gb DLT library it takes us about 2 hours to backup any 
> server on the SAN. Using the LTO library we're testing from IBM it 
> takes us about 30 minutes to backup that 30gb store.
> 
> The software we are using is BackupExec 8.5.
> 
> Phil
> 
> > Our backup media is 35/70GB DLT and HP Ultrium. At our
> > current 60GB, full
> > backups of our servers require over 15 hours; and we're 
> > planning substantial
> > increases in array size at all sites. How are those of you 
> > who have storage
> > in excess of 100GB assuring that you have reliable backups? 
> > Do you have the
> > tapes running all the time?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-18 Thread PRamatowski



Mebbe these?

from http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q280/1/32.ASP
XCCC: Exchange 2000 Windows 2000 Connectivity Through Firewalls

NOTE: For the server inside the firewall to communicate back through the
firewall to the external server, you also need to have ports 1024 through
65535 configured for outbound communications. Computers that initiate the
communication through the firewall use a client-side port that is
dynamically assigned and cannot be configured

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q259/2/40.ASP
XWEB: How to Configure OWA to Connect to Exchange Through a Firewall
NOTE: For the Exchange Server to communicate back through the firewall to
the OWA server it is also necessary to have the ephemeral ports 1024 through
65535 configured for outbound communications from the Exchange server to the
OWA server. Although you can specify what ports Exchange listens on for RPC
traffic, you can not specify what RPC ports the OWA application uses for RPC
communications.


Paul

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.


Hmmm...  I'll see if I can find the Q article.  I've known the range for a
few years now.



-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.


Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range.
Found the articles on how to make it static, but no range.  Also posted that
question on the list asking about the range and I don't recall anyone
stating what it was.  The MS tech I talked to had to place me on hold 3
times to get the answer. -Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.


You could have searched the MSKB and figured that out.  There's plenty of
documentation out there...

-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.


Just a note to everyone.  We called Microsoft and inquired what the range
for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it
connects to a socket.  According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to
64,000.

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.


No security consultant I know is going to open holes in the network from the
DMZ to the Internal network.  Being proficient in both Exchange and
Security, I feel sorry for your clients if you suggest the model you propose
below to them.

I think you ought to study up on security some more...

If you open holes from the DMZ to the internal LAN, why in the hell do you
have a DMZ.  You've made the DMZ virtually pointless.  Or did your teacher
or book you read say something different.  If it were a book that told you
to configure things this way, please send me the ISBN number, I really wanna
read that book.  Apparently, I've been taking the wrong approach for years
now.

I happen to know of a company who has the same model you describe.  After I
showed them the security issues, they were desiring a change for the better
immediately.

-Original Message-
From: Frank Knobbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:55 PM
> 
> Don't bother.  Use a proxy server and publish OWA.  Or require SSL and
> open port 443.  Or implement a VPN.  I still think putting an
> Exchange front-end
> server in a DMZ is kind of silly.  Not as silly with Exchange 
> 2000 as with
> Exchange 5.5, but silly nonetheless.

Ed, 

I don't find this silly at all. Let me try to clarify:

Scenario A:

You have an Internet connection coming to a firewall. Behind the firewall in
your internal network you have an Exchange server. You also have a web
server (maybe on the same box, maybe different box). You allow HTTPS traffic
through the firewall to the web server in the LAN.

Scenario B:

You have an Internet connection coming to a firewall. Behind the firewall in
your internal network you have an Exchange server. In a DMZ segment (which
can be a third network card in the firewall, or a segment between two
firewalls) you have a web server. HTTPS traffic is allowed to the web
server, and required ports (say, RPC, NetBIOS, InfoStore, Directory) are
allowed from the web server through the firewall to the Exchange server.


Scenario A has fol

RE: Internet LAGGING

2001-09-30 Thread PRamatowski



Someone probably didn't apply SP's correctly

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 6:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet LAGGING


We need everyone offline at midnight PST.
We are rebooting the internet then.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Putley
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet LAGGING


Seems fine to me

-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet LAGGING



Has anyone else noticed how lagged the whole web is, try some
traceroutes and see bogged some of these backbone routers are.


-Tony

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-26 Thread PRamatowski




Iron Chef Meat?
:-0

-Original Message-
From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Thats what I do all the time.. I even managed to spoil a meal of  "Instant
noodls" few days a go.

and Its funny that I can cook any type of meat better than most of my
friends.. 


Kuminda Chandimith
Sr. Technical Consultant
Ducont.com FZ-LLC
Tel:  + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237
Fax: +971-4-3913001
http://www.ducont.com



-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 September 2001 18:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Kuminda's definition of cooking has three components[1]
1. Heating
2. Boiling
3. Mixing

[1] If you have to do more than one for the same foodstuff, put the
stuff back and find a restaurant.  :)

> -Original Message-
> From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, September 24, 2001 08:59 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: MS Easybake Oven
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> hmm thats too much of cookin for me ... My definition of 
> cooking is much
> simpler than that.
> 
> Kuminda Chandimith
> Sr. Technical Consultant
> Ducont.com FZ-LLC
> Tel:  + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237
> Fax: +971-4-3913001
> http://www.ducont.com
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 September 2001 17:21
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> You must like soggy crust.
> 
> Warm the oven to 350. Take the pizza out of the box and place 
> on a cookie
> sheet and warm inside the oven for 10-12 minutes.
> 
> A warmed baking stone would be better than a cookie sheet, but more
> difficult to come by.
> 
> ...Joel
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When 
> the Reader Is
> Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or 
> Will Exist Only
> in a Vague and Undetermined State.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 4:29 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> I know how to cook Pizza...
> You buy a big pizza.. Eat half today. Cook next half in the microwave
> tomorrow..
> 
> 
> Kuminda Chandimith
> Sr. Technical Consultant
> Ducont.com FZ-LLC
> Tel:  + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237
> Fax: +971-4-3913001
> http://www.ducont.com
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 September 2001 23:36
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Ay-men!
> My brother will never let me forget the time years ago I was 
> boiling hotdogs
> on the stove (ew!) and let the water run out (EW!) 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Ah! Just because all the best chefs are men, does not mean 
> that all men are
> the best chefs. It's a subset thing. 
> 
> ...Joel
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:02 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Would someone please let my husband know this?  He hasn't 
> caught onto the
> idea yet, and I'm sick of coming up with dinner ideas...
> - Original Message -
> From: "Doug Hampshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:48 AM
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Everyone knows all the best chefs are men.
> 
> Doug Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Anyone who thinks that thinks cooking is only for girls 
> should watch Emeril
> on FoodTV!
> 
> ...Joel
> 
> --
> Rate this email:
> 1. It was useful
> 2. Not necessary but informative
> 3. Snort cheese bloody moron
> 4. Thanks, now I'm sending you a virus
> 5. All your base AAAH
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bauer, Mr. Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:29 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Wasn't that line from "Everything is Beautiful" by Ray Stevens?
> 
> My dad wouldn't let me play with my sister's easybake oven. 6 years of
> therapy and I still can't get in touch with my feminine side.
> 
> Rick Bauer
> The Hill School
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:26 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Has the list made that unmarked left turn into the Twilight Zone?
> 
> John Matteson; Exchange Manager
> Geac Corp

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-20 Thread PRamatowski


Ay-men!
My brother will never let me forget the time years ago I was boiling hotdogs
on the stove (ew!) and let the water run out (EW!) 

-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Ah! Just because all the best chefs are men, does not mean that all men are
the best chefs. It's a subset thing. 

...Joel

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MS Easybake Oven


Would someone please let my husband know this?  He hasn't caught onto the
idea yet, and I'm sick of coming up with dinner ideas...
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Hampshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Everyone knows all the best chefs are men.

Doug Hampshire
Iron Chef Hanji

-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Anyone who thinks that thinks cooking is only for girls should watch Emeril
on FoodTV!

...Joel

--
Rate this email:
1. It was useful
2. Not necessary but informative
3. Snort cheese bloody moron
4. Thanks, now I'm sending you a virus
5. All your base AAAH



-Original Message-
From: Bauer, Mr. Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Wasn't that line from "Everything is Beautiful" by Ray Stevens?

My dad wouldn't let me play with my sister's easybake oven. 6 years of
therapy and I still can't get in touch with my feminine side.

Rick Bauer
The Hill School

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Has the list made that unmarked left turn into the Twilight Zone?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that
there are none so blind as those who will not see --The Moody Blues
(I know you're out there)


-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


> "I'm trying to bake a cake and it keeps burning it"
> "Yes, you will need to install MSEO SP1 for that to stop"

my MS Easybake is on SP4. This morning I found that I was unable to make
any bagels with SP4 installed and had to wipe the oven's disk,
re-install the OS and appy SP1 thru SP3 to restore this functionality.
As we all know, SP3 is missing the latest security patches, and someone
was able to telnet in through the fridge and insert raisins into my
bagels.

give me strength...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubsc

RE: Rejected Message

2001-09-12 Thread PRamatowski



We've about 6100 mailboxes...

August- 
Rejected on general principals- 754
Rejected attachments-1262
Rejected Exe files- 1029
Rejected Spam- 18235
Virus-8368

July-
Rejected on general principals- 2841
Rejected attachments-1003
Rejected Exe files 748
Rejected Spam- 23445
Virus-6032 

June-


Well, y'all get the idea... 


Trend *rocks*!




-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rejected Message


I agree with your sentiment, but the 150+ pieces of spam and junk that
gather in my MAILSweeper filters on an almost daily basis say otherwise.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:19 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Rejected Message
> 
> 
> Basic attachment type filtering might be somewhat useful, but 
> set up any 'legitimate' text content filtering solution you'd 
> like and my 5th grader could get around it. Much like the 
> locks on my car doors, text filtering is purely an ornamental 
> deterrent.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Deward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:46 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Rejected Message
> > 
> > 
> > This is why improperly configured content filtering is a
> > waste of time.
> > 
> > Dan Deward
> > http://www.cmsconnect.com
> > 
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:07 PM
> > >To: Exchange Discussions
> > >Subject: RE: Rejected Message
> > >
> > >
> > >Amazing... This is why content filtering is a waste of time.
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Ed Crowley
> > >To: Exchange Discussions
> > >Sent: 9/10/2001 8:36 PM
> > >Subject: FW: Rejected Message
> > >
> > >For your amusement.  Of course the admin whose system does 
> this won't 
> > >get this.
> > >
> > >Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > >Tech Consultant
> > >Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> > >All your base are belong to us.
> > >
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:27 PM
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Rejected Message
> > >
> > >
> > >The attached mail message has been rejected for the 
> following reason:
> > >
> > >Body contains word(s)/phrase(s) 'joke'
> > >
> > >_
> > >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > 
> >_
> > >This message has been checked for all known viruses by 
> Star Internet 
> > >delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. 
> For further 
> > >information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or 
> alternatively 
> > >call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > The information in this communication and any attachments is
> > confidential
> > and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
> > addressee. If
> > you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination,
> > distribution or copying of this information is strictly 
> > prohibited. If you
> > have received this communication in error please notify us 
> > immediately on
> > 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. 
> > 
> > Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this
> > message that do not
> > relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend & 
> > Gilbert are neither
> > given nor endorsed by the firm. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> _
> > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star 
> Internet 
> > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. 
> For further 
> > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively 
> > call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: User Friendly Exchange List

2001-08-29 Thread PRamatowski


just turned it on! :-P



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Hey!  You don't have an OOO setup do you?  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Sorry, I'm getting ready to go on vacation in 10 minutes (going to ride
my motorcycle around until next Tuesday or until my butt falls off
(whichever comes first)

Just getting jumpy about Bad Karma, Something_Breaking before I get
outta here, etc...

Plus, I hear this list can be tough sometimes :)

This was supposed to read "My apologies to anyone offended, Beer and
Fish Taco's are on me".  Maybe if I start saving now...

I do like Joel's networked pst idea...

 HA!



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Dude, we are just having some fun.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Oh, I just didn't put citation/permission/attribution in the in the body
of my post, it was (and still is in the subject...

My apologies to anyone offended, 

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


I'd hate to be the idiot who originally posted that question somewhere
and then had it copied here without citation or permission...

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> 
> 
> Looks vaguely familiar
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> 
> 
> Where'd you get that from?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using
> > Arcserve.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > Not without you there
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time
> there either.
> > Doesn't sound like it will be any fun.  ;o)
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy
> > koslosky
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a "Duncan, 
> > Larry" or a "Duncan, Lawrence" or a "Lawrence Duncan") in
> the archives
> 
> > that I currently have available.  But they only go back to February 
> > 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years.
> > 
> > Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was

> > on TV a week or so ago.  What's the whole answer here?  I don't
> > believe we're getting it.
> > 
> > You're free to start your own list.  I do hope it's a success.  I
> > don't think I'll be playing though.  If I tire of this list, I
> can go visit
> > the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the
> > newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information.
> > 
> > Missy
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > See inline comments.
> > Besides, Larry;  Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment.
> > Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than
> one person.
> > >
> > > 
> > > Have you even posted to this list?
> > Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned
> > off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings
> > to webbased
> > only and I now only refer to

RE: User Friendly Exchange List

2001-08-29 Thread PRamatowski


Sorry, I'm getting ready to go on vacation in 10 minutes (going to ride my
motorcycle around until next Tuesday or until my butt falls off (whichever
comes first)

Just getting jumpy about Bad Karma, Something_Breaking before I get outta
here, etc...

Plus, I hear this list can be tough sometimes :)

This was supposed to read "My apologies to anyone offended, Beer and Fish
Taco's are on me".  Maybe if I start saving now...

I do like Joel's networked pst idea...

 HA!



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Dude, we are just having some fun.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Oh, I just didn't put citation/permission/attribution in the in the body
of my post, it was (and still is in the subject...

My apologies to anyone offended, 

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


I'd hate to be the idiot who originally posted that question somewhere
and then had it copied here without citation or permission...

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> 
> 
> Looks vaguely familiar
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> 
> 
> Where'd you get that from?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using 
> > Arcserve.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > Not without you there
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time
> there either.
> > Doesn't sound like it will be any fun.  ;o)
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy 
> > koslosky
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a "Duncan,
> > Larry" or a "Duncan, Lawrence" or a "Lawrence Duncan") in 
> the archives
> 
> > that I currently have available.  But they only go back to February
> > 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years.
> > 
> > Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was

> > on TV a week or so ago.  What's the whole answer here?  I don't 
> > believe we're getting it.
> > 
> > You're free to start your own list.  I do hope it's a success.  I 
> > don't think I'll be playing though.  If I tire of this list, I
> can go visit
> > the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the 
> > newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information.
> > 
> > Missy
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > See inline comments.
> > Besides, Larry;  Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. 
> > Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than
> one person.
> > >
> > > 
> > > Have you even posted to this list?
> > Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned 
> > off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings
> > to webbased
> > only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis.
> > 
> > You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are 
> > you? Steal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? 
> > The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm

> > now providing a more user friendly environment for passing 
> > information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their

> > choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent 
> > without attitude

RE: I need to block messages from a spammer

2001-08-29 Thread PRamatowski



Admin->IMS->Connections Tab->Message Filtering->Add
Enter the domain you would like to block

Remember to stop/start the IMS

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Karen Swart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I need to block messages from a spammer


Using Exchange 5.5, how do I block all messages from a specific domain?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: User Friendly Exchange List

2001-08-29 Thread PRamatowski


Oh, I just didn't put citation/permission/attribution in the in the body of
my post, it was (and still is in the subject...

My apologies to anyone offended, 

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


I'd hate to be the idiot who originally posted that question somewhere and
then had it copied here without citation or permission...

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> 
> 
> Looks vaguely familiar
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> 
> 
> Where'd you get that from?  
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using
> > Arcserve.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > Not without you there
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time 
> there either. 
> > Doesn't sound like it will be any fun.  ;o)
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > missy koslosky
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a "Duncan, 
> > Larry" or a "Duncan, Lawrence" or a "Lawrence Duncan") in 
> the archives
> 
> > that I currently have available.  But they only go back to February 
> > 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years.
> > 
> > Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman
> > who was on
> > TV a week or so ago.  What's the whole answer here?  I don't believe
> > we're getting it.
> > 
> > You're free to start your own list.  I do hope it's a
> > success.  I don't
> > think I'll be playing though.  If I tire of this list, I 
> can go visit
> > the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the
> > newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information.
> > 
> > Missy
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > 
> > 
> > See inline comments.
> > Besides, Larry;  Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the
> > compliment. Yes,
> > SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than 
> one person.
> > >
> > > 
> > > Have you even posted to this list?
> > Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is
> > turned off
> > by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings 
> > to webbased
> > only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis.
> > 
> > You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing
> > service, are you?
> > Steal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The
> > Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now
> > providing a more user friendly environment for passing information
> > regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and
> > perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without
> > attitude.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 
> > > >list, just  request a refund of your subscription fee. =20
> > > > -Mich=E8le
> > > > Immigration site:  
> > > > Our new 2001 Miata:  
> > > > Tiggercam:  
> > > > -
> > > > Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1:  You can=20
> > > > never tell
> > > > which way the train went by looking at the track.=20
> > > > -
> > >

RE: User Friendly Exchange List

2001-08-29 Thread PRamatowski



Outlook?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Do you use Outlook? 

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
"Remember you're never too old to hold your father's hand." - Molly, age 11 
-


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List




How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using 
Arcserve.

Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Not without you there

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either.
Doesn't sound like it will be any fun.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List


Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a "Duncan,
Larry" or a "Duncan, Lawrence" or a "Lawrence Duncan") in the archives
that I currently have available.  But they only go back to February
2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years.

Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on
TV a week or so ago.  What's the whole answer here?  I don't believe
we're getting it.

You're free to start your own list.  I do hope it's a success.  I don't
think I'll be playing though.  If I tire of this list, I can go visit
the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the
newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information.

Missy

- Original Message -
From: "Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


See inline comments.
Besides, Larry;  Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes,
SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person.
>
> 
> Have you even posted to this list?
Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off
by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased
only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis.

You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you?
Steal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The
Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now
providing a more user friendly environment for passing information
regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and
perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without
attitude.


> 
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> >=20
> >=20
> > I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20
> >list, just  request a refund of your subscription fee.
> >=20
> > -Mich=E8le
> > Immigration site:  
> > Our new 2001 Miata:  
> > Tiggercam:  
> > -
> > Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1:  You can=20
> > never tell
> > which way the train went by looking at the track.=20
> > -
> >=20
> >=20
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List
> >=20
> >=20
> > I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone
=
> of
> > this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20
> >lists about  the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon 
> >myself=20  to create an
> > alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite
and
> > sensitive to new Admin needs.
> >=20
> > This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization
that
> > different people learn different ways and it's time to have an  
> >alternative. =20
> > I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20
> > do the same
> > for us.
>

RE: User Friendly Exchange List

2001-08-29 Thread PRamatowski




How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using 
Arcserve.

Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


Not without you there

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either.
Doesn't sound like it will be any fun.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List


Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a "Duncan,
Larry" or a "Duncan, Lawrence" or a "Lawrence Duncan") in the archives
that I currently have available.  But they only go back to February
2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years.

Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on
TV a week or so ago.  What's the whole answer here?  I don't believe
we're getting it.

You're free to start your own list.  I do hope it's a success.  I don't
think I'll be playing though.  If I tire of this list, I can go visit
the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the
newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information.

Missy

- Original Message -
From: "Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List


See inline comments.
Besides, Larry;  Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes,
SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person.
>
> 
> Have you even posted to this list?
Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off
by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased
only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis.

You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you?
Steal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The
Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now
providing a more user friendly environment for passing information
regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and
perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without
attitude.


> 
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
> >=20
> >=20
> > I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20
> >list, just  request a refund of your subscription fee.
> >=20
> > -Mich=E8le
> > Immigration site:  
> > Our new 2001 Miata:  
> > Tiggercam:  
> > -
> > Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1:  You can=20
> > never tell
> > which way the train went by looking at the track.=20
> > -
> >=20
> >=20
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List
> >=20
> >=20
> > I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone
=
> of
> > this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20
> >lists about  the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon 
> >myself=20  to create an
> > alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite
and
> > sensitive to new Admin needs.
> >=20
> > This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization
that
> > different people learn different ways and it's time to have an  
> >alternative. =20
> > I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20
> > do the same
> > for us.
> >=20
> > For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel=20
> > free to do so
> > at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >=20
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List adm

RE: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?

2001-08-29 Thread PRamatowski




And if that link doesn't work,

3.35 Q: How do I change the NDR, storage limit warnings and other system
generated warning or error messages generated by Exchange?

A1: In Exchange 2000, you can use Event Sinks to programmatically change
these. See MSDN.

A2: By contracting with Microsoft Consulting Services (MCS) [plain English:
"Get out your wallet."]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?


 

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Chadowboxing: Debating back- and-forth as to how to count a close election. 
-


-Original Message-
From: Marie Buckley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?


All,

Is there any way of customising the "Your mailbox is over its size limit"
message sent when mailbox storage limits are used (Exc 5.5 SP4).  As we do
not prohibit receiving mail we would like to change the text in the System
administrator message from "You may not be able to send or receive new
mail" to something more appropriate...

Thanks,
Marie

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account Passwo rd)

2001-08-27 Thread PRamatowski


Oh we got bdc's :)

We're trying to decide if it would be easier to lobotomize everyone[1]
rather than change the friggin'[2] thing.[3]

[1] Me first please! 
[2] Not for Lyris.
[3] Not really.

As we're in the process of domain migration/consolidation, and since we're
rebuilding/rotating servers as we go through each site, that will take care
of it. Maybe not as fast as we'd really like but...

Thanks
Paul


Drew,
Wonder maybe we can get a couple million monkeys typing on a couple million
keyboards on...
Nah, never get that one into the budget 


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account
Passwo rd)


You will have to do all sites that share the same service account at the
same time.  Follow the Q article.  The only thing you need to be careful
about is if you have multiple BDCs in remote locations for the domain that
the service account exists in.  You'll need to...

S>



-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account
Passwo rd)


you still ought to be able to just do it.  Make sure there's no replication
happening at that instant, shut down the services and type fast but
accurately. :P

Drew (MOS)

KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp
Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net

"Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted
whenever I am contradicted." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account
Passwo rd)


and if you have ~50 sites[1], using three different service accounts[2]?

[1] a lan/wan/political thing, this.
[2]A political thing, that.  It might have ~50 service accounts :(


Paul

bcctc

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account
Password)


Single site? No problem at all. Just do it.

- Original Message -
From: "Debysingh, Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account Password)


> Hello All,
>
> I need to change the Administrator password (service account) for my
> Exchange Organization. I searched the archives and FAQ and got good
> information. Most notable is Q157780: How to Change the Service Account
> Password. Please advise me on any other issues I should consider before
> making this change. I am not opposed to opening an incident with PSS if
you
> all believe it to be necessary.
>
> Exchange Org. Configuration:
> One Site
> Exchange 5.5 (SP3 on 3 servers and SP4 on 1 server)
> Mixture of Windows 2000 Advance (SP1) and Windows NT 4.0
> (SP5)
> McAfee Group Shield for Exchange (I open a support call with
> NAI support)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_

RE: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account Passwo rd)

2001-08-27 Thread PRamatowski


and if you have ~50 sites[1], using three different service accounts[2]?

[1] a lan/wan/political thing, this.
[2]A political thing, that.  It might have ~50 service accounts :(


Paul

bcctc

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account
Password)


Single site? No problem at all. Just do it.

- Original Message -
From: "Debysingh, Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account Password)


> Hello All,
>
> I need to change the Administrator password (service account) for my
> Exchange Organization. I searched the archives and FAQ and got good
> information. Most notable is Q157780: How to Change the Service Account
> Password. Please advise me on any other issues I should consider before
> making this change. I am not opposed to opening an incident with PSS if
you
> all believe it to be necessary.
>
> Exchange Org. Configuration:
> One Site
> Exchange 5.5 (SP3 on 3 servers and SP4 on 1 server)
> Mixture of Windows 2000 Advance (SP1) and Windows NT 4.0
> (SP5)
> McAfee Group Shield for Exchange (I open a support call with
> NAI support)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: oh, man what a mess

2001-08-23 Thread PRamatowski



*And*, it's available!  (for now)
:)

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: oh, man what a mess


LOL!!  Now that's a great domain name!  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: oh, man what a mess


I understand that the IMS was setup incorrectly in
this remote site.  My dilemma is that 3000 messages (some 3 years old,
some 5 months old) have apparently been sent after configuring the IMS
correctly, (all sent
outbound.)

If this is true:

>Setting an IMS to Inbound Only in Exchange 5.5 and earlier will not 
>keep  the MTAs from routing outbound SMTP mail to the IMS server.

then why did 3000 very old outbound messages get sent after setting the
IMS to Outbound Only?

I prefer ahfuku.com, that also works.

Charma, ED.

On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Ed Crowley wrote:

> Jennifer, please read the list!  This is discussed every so often!  
> Setting an IMS to Inbound Only in Exchange 5.5 and earlier will not 
> keep the MTAs from routing outbound SMTP mail to the IMS server.  The 
> way to keep that from happening is to change the Address Space so that

> it has but one entry of "clownpenis.fart".  (It has to be that exact 
> domain.  Don't ask me why.) Then the GWARTs won't try to route mail 
> bound to valid SMTP addresses to that server.  Microsoft would call 
> this behavior "by design".  If it is by design then it is a severe and

> longstanding design flaw.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> All your base are belong to us.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: oh, man what a mess
>
>
> After changing a remote IMS from send only Inbound to send Outbound 
> Only then back to Inbound only mode, many messages (3000) were sent 
> from as far back as 1999.  If the IMS is set to inbound only, would it

> not send undeliverables for refused connections or would it just queue

> the message? It seems that any other maildomain that is not hosted by 
> the org would be sent as undeliverable yet it got queued somewhere.  
> Anybody know where?  I have other remote IMS queues that could have 
> the same issue, but I cannot locate the queue directories on those 
> servers.
>
> I know test it and find out...which is what got me into this mess. 
> Also, whenever I would make the change it would tell me to restart the

> service. I hit ok, restarted the service, reopened the IMS properties 
> and the apply button would be highlighted as if it never took the 
> change. After going thru this motion several times, it would behave 
> the same way.
>
> Hope this makes a bit of sense, I am a bit frantic at the moment.
>
> Jennifer Baker
> Fluke Corporation
> http://www.fluke.com
> http://www.flukenetworks.com
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-22 Thread PRamatowski




>>We were lucky if we didn't drop them on our toes!
The tablets or the servers?

*stone* tablets?  LUXURY!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files



When I was a girl, we didn't HAVE any of this new-fangled "training"!  We
had to decipher the Sanskrit tablets our grandparents left us to figure out
how to run a server!
AND WE LIKED IT!


-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
I've learned that you can keep puking long after you think you're finished. 
-


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files


I would have killed for training
To date I have had 2 classes. Both were free

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files



Me too!  
<\aol mode>

What's friggin' training anyway?  Who needs it when y'all are just
sitting here waiting for my Urgent Questions anyway, eh?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files


ps.  most of us here have learned on the job

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be
changed regularly, and for the same reason. 
-


-Original Message-
From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files


Well, excuse me  I'm here trying to get help because I don't know
EVERYTHING.  In fact, I have not had the luxury of formal training. I've
had to learn everything on the job, on the fly and from books.  The
questions you are asking me don't make sense to me because I'm using the
terminology that is in Outlook.  If you look on the Outlook toolbar,
you'll see a picture of a rolodex and it's called Contacts. As you know,
it has a whole bunch of names and addresses in it.   You can create more
of those rolodex things (Contact lists?) and put them in the Public
Folder, as I'm sure you already know.  Maybe I created my "Contact list"
in the wrong place.  Maybe there's a permissions tab somewhere I don't
know about.  I don't know.  That's why I'm here.  

V. Ewart

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files


Do I use Outlook!?!?!  

Listen here knucklehead who has no clue.  I'm trying to help you out
here and you are using incorrect terms and have no clue what you are
doing.  I have no clue what the hell you are doing because you have no
clue how to word things nor use the proper terminology.

I do know WTF a contacts FOLDER is and I know how to use and configure
the stupid F'in thing.  Apparently you don't.

Now oddly enough when I setup the config you're trying to setup, it
works just fine for me.  No problems at all.  Of course, I know how to
configure my server.

Have you looked in Xadmin to make sure all the permissions are correct
there?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki
L.
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files


Do you use Outlook?  It is an address book, basically.  It has names,
addresses, phone number, email addresses.  The email addresses will come
up on your outlook addresses list if you check that box in the
properties.

ve

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files


OK, you're really confusing me with this "contacts file", is this an
actual file like a spreadsheet or is it a folder containing a bunch of
contacts?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki
L.
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files


Specifically, I created a contact file named "clients" and put it in the
public folder and set the default to "Editor".  It did not allow others
to edit the conte

RE: importing 2nd SMTP address

2001-08-22 Thread PRamatowski




Just to break up the subject column a little, I can't get the movie to load.
Cr@p :(

http://snlmm.net/video.phtml?video=snljtorg-commercial-bassomatic

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address


Do a search for "Bassomatic 76"!



-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address


Some of the over 30[1] crowd is, too...

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com

[1] Barely, but I am..


> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:47 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address
> 
> 
> That's great bass!
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> All your base are belong to us.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul 
> Ramatowski
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address
> 
> 
> Fish?
> Gimme an ulta-light, a beetle-spin, the James River, and a beer.
> (Bass-O-Matic jokes anyone?)
> 
> Exchange?
> Gimme details, MSKB, Google, the faq, archives and a few good 
> books. Then
> after it's over, a beer :)
> 
> Chris I'm sorry, thought I gave an answer that was short, 
> sweet and pretty
> much on the mark. Wasn't trying to crack wise, really!
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> The currently broken link shouldn't be required for the task 
> described. We
> prefer to think of the FAQ answers in question as brief 
> rather than vague.
> When combined with a search of the archives those two 
> questions yield a
> plethora of hits, which might be of amazing help to the industrious.
> 
> Teach a man to fish and all that.
> 
> *
> Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
> Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
> * 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:18 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: importing 2nd SMTP address
> > 
> > 
> > thanks. 3.21 and 3.22 couldnt be *more* vague . . . and the 
> > link doesnt work
> > anymore . . . for me at least.
> > 
> > -
> > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a 
> > whole lot more as
> > they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
> > finals...
> > -
> > - Original Message -
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:07 PM
> > Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address
> > 
> > 
> > > faq 3.21 and 3.22
> > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:03 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: importing 2nd SMTP address
> > >
> > >
> > > I need to import 2nd smtp address (same domain, different username
> > format).
> > > I exported the recipient info, and am going to add it back 
> > in and I get an
> > > error that an address of that type already exists. I am 
> using SMTP:
> > > So I need to use a different tag ? Isnt there also a switch 
> > when importing
> > > to tell it to do all fields?
> > >
> > > TIA!
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

__

RE: Server sizing

2001-08-20 Thread PRamatowski

What is your replication schedule to the other sites (not counting notes)?

-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server sizing

Dear anyone,

Our backbone server has had difficulties for the last two weeks. E-mail is
queuing up and eventually the MTA can't handle its load and stops. There
are 60 sites connected that are producing the necessary e-mail and
directory replication traffic. We've also set up a Connector for Lotus
Notes that replicates directory information from 18K+ Notes users into the
Exchange environment every day at midnight.
Personally I think our current hardware isn't good enough anymore and
needs to be replaced. But how can I convince my management?
Our current configuration:
Compaq Proliant 3000R M6/300-1 512 cache 64/1 (Pentium II/66/300Mhz)
Array-controller Compaq PCI smart-2/p, 32-bit incl
7 X 4.3Gb U&W-SCSI hot pluggable 1" C: partition Raid 0, D: partition Raid
5
2 X 64 Mb EDO (60-NS Dimm)
Does anyone know certain hardware specifications for dedicated connector
servers?
Any help would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Olivier

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: importing 2nd SMTP address

2001-08-20 Thread PRamatowski

faq 3.21 and 3.22
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: importing 2nd SMTP address

I need to import 2nd smtp address (same domain, different username format).
I exported the recipient info, and am going to add it back in and I get an
error that an address of that type already exists. I am using SMTP:
So I need to use a different tag ? Isnt there also a switch when importing
to tell it to do all fields?

TIA!

-
I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
finals...
-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IMS Limits incorrect?

2001-08-20 Thread PRamatowski

Man, that sounds ::painful::

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMS Limits incorrect?

The encoding process when sending attachments adds about a 25% overhead
to a file.
I'm not sure if the IMS takes that into account. You might try setting
the limit at 13MB and see if you can pass a 10MB file then.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Perley-TM
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMS Limits incorrect?

Hi All,

Have any of encountered issues where the limits through an IMS is
different than what is actually set?  We have a limit of 10MB (1Kb)
set on both our IMS boxes but we cannot send anything larger than 7.5
Mb.  If we bump up the limit to 20Mb we are able to send our 10Mb
messages.

I didn't find anything obvious in technet and wanted to check with you
all before calling MS support.  We are running Exchange 5.5 Enterprise
Edition with SP4.

Thanks,
Scott Perley
TELUS Mobility

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: distribution list

2001-08-16 Thread PRamatowski



http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q160/1/18.asp 

or

http://www.slipstick.com/contacts/print.htm  (Export Client Extension)

Throw this on the DL owner's pc and let *them* do it :) 



-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: distribution list


Tools, Directory Export from Exchange Admin, then import to Excel.

Check out the link to the FAQ below.

-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2001 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: distribution list


ex 5.5 sp 4 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: distribution list


Exchange version?

Kevinm
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandeep
Raghuraman , Gurgaon
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: distribution list



Hi all
   Can we have a print out of a DL . I have in my site quite a few
DLS's and need to track the the users in those DL's a hard copy can be
handy ..


thanks

 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread PRamatowski


Zing!

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Problems


Actually you type pretty good for a 2yr old.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Problems


Please disregard my previous email.  A two year old childs hands are
quicker than the eye !

- Original Message -
From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:16 PM
Subject: OWA Problems


> Apparently there were pieces to the puzzle that I was not aware of.
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread PRamatowski


since I'm done for the day...

http://www.seuss.org/seuss/seuss.purity.html (pg-13) 
http://www.tcfhe.com/foxkids/downloads/seuss_grneggs.mov (for Matt)

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: distribution list


Can I do it wearing sox?

(We're playing Dr. Seuss today, right?)

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: distribution list


Can I do it in a box?

- Original Message -
From: "Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: distribution list


> At work, at home, in the car, on a plane, I guess you could do it anywhere
> you have network connectivity..
> Note don't do it in the shower, you may experience undesired results.
>
> In Exchange Admin>F1> read the help file.
>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:07 PM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>Subject: distribution list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Exchange 5.5.
> >>>
> >>>I neeed to take someone off a distribution list. Where can I do This.
> >>>
> >>>TIA.
> >>>
> >>>_
> >>>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

89 matches

Mail list logo