OWA question
Here's a question with probably a very simple answer: Why can't you access personal distribution lists from OWA? Is this a feature or a bug? Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Robert Moore, MCSE Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Login?
Maybe she told IE to save her password? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Login? By "re-did her home computer", what do you mean? Sounds like some pass-through authentication going on... -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Login? Morning, I have an interesting dilemma. Running E2k. One of my employees recently redid her home computer. Now when she goes to check her email from home using OWA, she is not prompted for username / password - it takes her straight to her inbox. She has DSL/Cable. I thought perhaps she had 'saved' her username and password, but on my home computer, the login box still appears - just filled out. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. If you checks her email at a different machine - she is prompted. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
Oh, yeah? I see "Clayton GDY"... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And "Clayton GDY" is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem solved
Hello all-- Sometime back I emailed the group about a Mailbox Manager (on E2K) problem. No one in the group was able to help me solve it, but now that I've got it fixed, I thought I'd pass along the info in case it helps anyone else. Specifically, Mailbox Manager quit working after I applied the Information Store patch Q303451engi386.exe. I called MS, and, after checking into a lot of things they suggested applying E2K SP2. After I got an update to keep my AV software working with SP2, I updated. Now Mailbox Manager is working again. Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Robert Moore, MCSE Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K on a DC
When you open AD Users and Computers, go to the View menu and choose Advanced Features. Rob -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K on a DC I have a system that is a 2K DC and the only system in the domain that also has E2K on it. Here is the issue, when I go into users properties in AD I do not have the "Exchange Advanced" tab. I know why I think, cvause you can manage a Account from the exchange server. But how do I get this funcionality? I have found nothing no MS site, any ideas? -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greetings All
People ask questions about all versions of Exchange. We rarely see questions from anything before 5.5. Most of the questions are, indeed, about 5.5. But there are also some about 2000. Rob -Original Message- From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Greetings All Hello, I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for several years now, on the Swynk website. Since this Listserver is named "Exchange" - that tells me that I can ask questions about ALL versions of Exchange? Is that true, or are there any specific Listservers for Exchange 2K? Thanks in advance, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSL and Outlook Web Access
I think it was called Secure Server, but I'm not certain. The list price
may have been higher than the $175 I paid--I think we got a discount
'cause we're a school. I think it also was the lowest end
certificate--we're not doing any e-commerce or anything.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Grewal, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 12/19/2001 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: SSL and Outlook Web Access
Robert,
Do you have an exact product name for the Verisign Certificate
that your
company is using?? I am trying to explain what we need from to
our vendor,
but they are not understanding.
Thanks again for your help,
Raj Grewal
MCSE Win2000, MCSE NT 4.0, CNE5, CNA5, CNA4.11, Network+
Senior Network Analyst
Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
(312) 751-8000 Ext. 2084
"We Will Meet Again, I Don't Know Where, I Don't Know Why."
-----Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SSL and Outlook Web Access
Verisign, $175.
-Original Message-
From: Grewal, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SSL and Outlook Web Access
Hello,
Right now we have SSL on our Outlook Web Access Server with a CA
that I made
in Windows 2000. There is one issue with it; it is not
compatible with the
latest version of IE for the MAC. Which SSL's do you all use
for your
Outlook Web Access Servers??? I know Verisign makes them.
Could you also
give me an idea for price???
Thank You all in Advance,
Raj Grewal
MCSE Win2000, MCSE NT 4.0, CNE5, CNA5, CNA4.11, Network+
Senior Network Analyst
Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
(312) 751-8000
"All of your dreams are made of strawberry-lemonade."
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.rá
bï½½!බ 0 á§&zÇà±±r欬:.Ë
mé[hy \z[,t)räZZvh맧+-iÙ¢2íG(
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê&
RE: Exchange CALs
Outlook is essentially free. You get it when you buy Exchange. You need CALs for Exchange, though. Rob -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange CALs How exactly does the Exchange 2000 CALs work? If all my clients will be using Outlook, will I need to buy CALs for them also or does Outlook give me the CAL for the user? Thanks, Mike .rí½¶à³zrmyzræ vi â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌ"Ç(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®&Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\ ©àx¸¬µ§fyb²Ö)ìÃ)är
RE: SSL and Outlook Web Access
Verisign, $175. -Original Message- From: Grewal, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SSL and Outlook Web Access Hello, Right now we have SSL on our Outlook Web Access Server with a CA that I made in Windows 2000. There is one issue with it; it is not compatible with the latest version of IE for the MAC. Which SSL's do you all use for your Outlook Web Access Servers??? I know Verisign makes them. Could you also give me an idea for price??? Thank You all in Advance, Raj Grewal MCSE Win2000, MCSE NT 4.0, CNE5, CNA5, CNA4.11, Network+ Senior Network Analyst Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (312) 751-8000 "All of your dreams are made of strawberry-lemonade." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suspicious files
You guys better watch it. This guy might think you're serious. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files But, isn't that how you should keep the size of the IS within reason? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files That's where I'm going wrong. I've always scanned it with my scanner set to delete infected files. > -Original Message- > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 December 2001 20:06 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Suspicious files > > > With the AutoClean option turned on. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:04 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Suspicious files > > > What happens when you scan the priv.edb file? > > > -Original Message- > From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Suspicious files > > > Hi all, > My anti virus just reported a couple of infected files that I > don't recognize. > > WSPFT2TW > WSPFT2TV > > They were both infected and quarantined. They were sitting in > \EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\ > > I'm running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. Can anyone shed some > light as to if they were system files or attachments or ? > Thanks in advance. > > Johnny > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > -- > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & > Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete the > message. Thank you. > > == > == > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
The test is easy Study Transcender exams For about a month -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Good going, Robert! Yesterday, I rescheduled my test for later was originally supposed to be on the 7th; rescheduled for the 20th. -Michèle Immigration site: <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> The Miata: <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> Tiggercam: <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> - "Even though you choose to be ignorant, you shouldn't presume that your employers wish the same." Ed Crowley, June 12, 2000 - -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Accelerated Passed it yesterday at 2 On to the hard stuff -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Sircam and BadTrans Hundreds of Attempts this week Thank The Gods for Trend Denis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Accelerated Passed it yesterday at 2 On to the hard stuff -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Sircam and BadTrans Hundreds of Attempts this week Thank The Gods for Trend Denis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2
No, you can't manage the mailboxes from the Exchange server, it has to be done from within AD U & C. (Unless your Exchange server is a DC--then you can use AD U & C on it.) Rob -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2 You say I must manage it from the PDC emulator not the Exchange server it will appear thanks, VERY tired. Long migration! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:23 AM Subject: RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2 > View - Advanced features > > Simon Butler > Merrill Lynch HSBC > > > -Original Message- > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2 > > > GREAT, thank you! Now if am missing that TAb in AD U&C but have the other > three Xchange tabs any suggestions? > > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:19 AM > Subject: RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > > > > Exchange advanced tab on object in AD U&C's, mailbox permissions > > button. > > > > Regards, > > > > Rob Ellis > > Messaging Consultant > > Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes > > IBM Global Services > > DDI: 01256 752845 > > Mobile: 07974 111867 > > Fax: 01256 754899 > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:17 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > > > > I did put that question forward fairly poorly, let me start again . . > > . . I need to allow multiple AD accounts have access to one mailbox on > Exchange > > 2K. Sp1. > > How do I do this? > > > > =John Q > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Robert Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:12 AM > > Subject: RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > > > > > > I'm not sure exactly what you have in mind. But to view the > > permissions on a mailbox, you go into AD Users and Computers. Then you > > open up the individual in question, click on the Exchange Advanced > > tab, then click the Mailbox Rights button. > > > > Rob > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > > > > > > How do I manage individual mailboxes in E2K? I see no permissions on > > each mailbox only the IS. > > Just migrated from 5.5 to 2K and forgot to read all of the > > Administrating > > part of the manual, I am reading but any help is appreciated. > > > > Thanks as always, > > -John Q > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the > > personal > attention > > of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the > intended > > addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any > attachments is > > unauthorised - please notify the send
RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K
I'm not sure exactly what you have in mind. But to view the permissions on a mailbox, you go into AD Users and Computers. Then you open up the individual in question, click on the Exchange Advanced tab, then click the Mailbox Rights button. Rob -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K How do I manage individual mailboxes in E2K? I see no permissions on each mailbox only the IS. Just migrated from 5.5 to 2K and forgot to read all of the Administrating part of the manual, I am reading but any help is appreciated. Thanks as always, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: turkey
Amen! My favorite days are when everyone else goes home early. Well, except for the ones I go home early. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: turkey Today is the best Nobody here to support Drool all over desk -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: turkey Not us poor slobs... We are always the last to go. Our building is pretty empty today too. And the boss is gone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: turkey Everyone has probably already left on vacation. Have a nice thanksgiving everyone. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Tape Storage
Here's a somewhat off-topic question. How do you store your tapes? We have a small network, and a lot of backup tapes. I know many of you have larger networks than we do, so must have a sh*tpile of tapes. How do you store them? Right now ours are just laying on a table (except for the off-site ones). It'd be nice to have some kind of wall-mounted shelf that allowed for some organization, yet would still keep them handy. Does anybody have a good source? Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
For receiving faxes, consider jfax (http://www.j2.com/index.asp). Receiving is free, you get your own fax number, faxes get emailed to you. They do sending, too, for a minor fee--something like $4.95 a month, plus per minute charges. The free fax receive works great--I've used it for the last year or two, no problem. I haven't used their send fax service, so I can't tell you about that. It's not integrated with Exchange, but you do get faxes via email, and it really really works! Doesn't sound like you really need integration, anyway. Rob -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I am not looking for anything fancy. I just want the ability to fax out of Outlook and receive faxes. I get about 2 per year and I send about 5 per year. I was hoping to not spend any money if I dont have to. I may have to look to something like WinFax. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Fax Oh, one other thing. If someone on the outside of your company is sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental DTMF addressing to cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server to be properly routed, then that person will have access to a digital route, which basically means that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is ever going to use it. You can buy the technology, but that does not make it worthwhile. Inbound will have to be manually forwarded. Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably less useful than an Underwood. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would be sad. So it is hard to imagine a scenario in which someone would want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in which you have a requirement for a small number of users to send or receive Faxes, but can't cost justify the incremental cost of something like OmTool for Exchange over the cost of some personal modems. Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. Most good enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal modem to link to an external connection while at the same time being connected to the enterprise network. Obviously, something like OmTool solves this problem, but that does not make the cost story any prettier.
RE: Appending Text to outbound email in Exchange 2000
Something to do with Jim Jones in Guyana, if I'm not mistaken. -Original Message- From: Dominic Lanza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appending Text to outbound email in Exchange 2000 What's that supposed to mean? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appending Text to outbound email in Exchange 2000 Please, everyone line up in an orderly fashion. There is plenty of Kool-Aid for all of us. -Original Message- From: Dominic Lanza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appending Text to outbound email in Exchange 2000 Is there any way to append a text message to all outbound email messages in Exchange 2000? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
I sort on the rule if "http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm"; appears in the body, then send it to my Exchange List folder. That works. Rob -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules? Subscribe a public folder. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Witherspoon Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2000 Rules? Hey all, I'm trying to set some rules so that the emails from this list gets diverted to the appropriate folder. Which is great (in theory) the problem is that none of the rules seem to work. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Mailbox Manager Question
I've been running the E2K Mailbox Manager for the last few weeks, using it to delete all email older than 30 days. Suddenly, it has stopped working. (Or at least it has stopped notifying me that it's working.) I've tried setting it up again, to no avail. Anybody know why it might have stopped working? Or what I could monitor to figure it out? There's nothing in Event Viewer about it. The only change I've made to the server since it stopped working was applying the information store patch (Q30451engi386.exe). Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding attachment utilities
This came across the W2KNews email letter this morning. I've never seen or used the product, but it sounds like it might do what you want. Rob * Powerful New Exchange Mailbox Management Tool Released CAMEO Recon is an extremely powerful tool for Microsoft Exchange that permits you to easily manage the content of user mailboxes in a way that simple was not possible before. Product Features CAMEO Recon allows you to can scan your entire Exchange Information Store including all your users' folders (Inbox, Deleted Items, Sent Items, Calendar, Notes, etc.) looking for matches you specify. That can either be a directly entered word or phrase, or you can create a detailed Critical Word List of up to 200 words and phrases. Best of all, you can initiate actions on matches messages in mail boxes and you can either delete these messages, or copy the message for review , or strip off the attachment that was included with the matched message or any combination. All actions are invisible to users. Cameo Recon works with Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000. You can perform Advanced policy operations but also on-demand searches to handle unique problems. It searches the entire Information Store. This means every folder in every mailbox: Inbox, Outbox, Sent Items, Drafts and Deleted Items. CAMEO Recon even searches the Calendar, Contacts, Journal, Notes, and Tasks. CAMEO Recon even searches any user created subfolders. Searching can be based upon an individual mailbox, a distribution list, an organizational unit, a server, or the entire organization. Any individual component of messages can be searched (To, From, Subject, Body, Attachment Name, cc, etc.) or all components can be searched. CAMEO Recon is licensed on a per-administrative console and per mailbox basis. You can already see the benefits of course. Cleaning out mailboxes for a new virus that made it through the filter, yanking a disparaging email that was sent to everyone by a fired employee, killing a chain email letter that is being forwarded to everyone, you name it. Performance is optimized yielding scans of 30,000 - 60,000 messages per hour. CAMEO Recon was built with Visual Basic and Visual C++ in additional to substantial use of Assembly Language for maximum performance. If you are running Exchange, this is a utility you really want in your toolkit, because you may never know when the $#!+ hits the fan. List price starts at just $995 for 1 admin license and 500 mailboxes. Get your 30-day eval over here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=102901-3PCameoRecon -Original Message- From: Treacy, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question regarding attachment utilities Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment - search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their size Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mad at My Exchange Server
Do you want to find them? Or do you just want to delete them? Run Mailbox Manager and delete them, if that's all you need. Rob -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mad at My Exchange Server I cannot find where my users deleted items are and it still shows that there is 256,000 k in the Private information store under the deleted items K column. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover a Public Folder
Dang, I thought it was a fish burrito. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder Would that be a "fish" taco? -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder We could compromise and say it's a taco... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Give to the world the best you have, and the best will come back to you. --Madeline S. Bridges -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder That's not a wrap, that's a friggin burrito! -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder a quick search of http://support.microsoft.com with the term "dumpsteralwayson" (no quotes) resulted in: http://search.support.microsoft.com/kb/psssearch.asp?SPR=msall&T=B&KT=AL L&T1 =7d&LQ=dumpsteralwayson&PQ=PastQuery&S=F&A=T&DU=C&FR=0&D=support&LPR=&LN G=EN G&VR=http%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.com%2Fsupport%3Bhttp%3A%2F%2Fsupport .mic rosoft.com%2Fservicedesks%2Fwebcasts%3Bhttp%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.co m%2F highlights&CAT=Support&VRL=ENG&SA=GN Link may wrap. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved... the ones who never yawn and say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars." - Jack Kerouac -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder Thanks to all MS say that Retension time is not functionnal for Public Folder. I didn't knew netiher. What is dumsteralwayson hack? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: 24 octobre, 2001 15:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder Depends. Was deleted item retention turned on? How about applying the dumsteralwayson hack? -- Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover a Public Folder
It's not a fish burrito, is it? -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder Mmmm...burritos! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder That's not a wrap, that's a friggin burrito! -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder a quick search of http://support.microsoft.com with the term "dumpsteralwayson" (no quotes) resulted in: http://search.support.microsoft.com/kb/psssearch.asp?SPR=msall&T=B&KT=AL L&T1 =7d&LQ=dumpsteralwayson&PQ=PastQuery&S=F&A=T&DU=C&FR=0&D=support&LPR=&LN G=EN G&VR=http%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.com%2Fsupport%3Bhttp%3A%2F%2Fsupport .mic rosoft.com%2Fservicedesks%2Fwebcasts%3Bhttp%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.co m%2F highlights&CAT=Support&VRL=ENG&SA=GN Link may wrap. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved... the ones who never yawn and say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars." - Jack Kerouac -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder Thanks to all MS say that Retension time is not functionnal for Public Folder. I didn't knew netiher. What is dumsteralwayson hack? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: 24 octobre, 2001 15:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder Depends. Was deleted item retention turned on? How about applying the dumsteralwayson hack? -- Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover a Public Folder
I think DIR means Deleted Item Retention. -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder Don't understand Andy. JF -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: 24 octobre, 2001 15:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover a Public Folder DIR in place? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AntiVirus Change
Is that kind of like a Vulcan Private Network? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change No, but for a small fee of $29.95, Doug would be happy to do a Vulcan Mind Meld with you. -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change I was hoping you could send your pictures out to the list. Oh, I suppose they don't allow attachments, do they? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change ph Pictures, how old fashioned... -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change And I have pictures proving said fact (no Andy, not those kind of pictures). -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change You're assuming that troll's have a concept of gender. I don't make such assumptions. I do, however, have it on good authority that you most certainly are not male. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change > > > > And, he called me a "he". I am so not a he. > ~ > -K.Borndale > Network Administrator > Sybari Software > 631.630.8569 -direct dial > 631.439.0689 -fax > http://www.sybari.com > "One man's ceiling is another man's floor" > > > |+---> > || Roger Seielstad | > || || e.com> | > || Sent by: | > || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| > || .swynk.com | > || | > || | > || 10/24/2001 10:36 AM | > || Please respond to| > || "Exchange Discussions" | > || | > |+---> > > >- > -- > -| > | > >| > | To: "Exchange Discussions" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > | cc: > >| > | Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change > >| > > >- > -- > -| > > > > > Because in your message, you asked Kelly, a Sybari employee, for > information > comparing two of her company's competitors products to each other. > > I would suggest going to Norton and Trend Micro and asking them the > question. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT > Senior Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems > Atlanta, GA > http://www.peregrine.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change > > > > > > The reason Microsoft Will have a doc comparing birds to ants. > > > > > > What your Q has to do with my request > > Kelly said he have documents comparing two antivirus products. > > I assume he made some research on this subject in the past. > > Maybe he also has a table to compare Norton to Trend. > > I asked him. That's all. > >
RE: AntiVirus Change
I was hoping you could send your pictures out to the list. Oh, I suppose they don't allow attachments, do they? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change ph Pictures, how old fashioned... -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change And I have pictures proving said fact (no Andy, not those kind of pictures). -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change You're assuming that troll's have a concept of gender. I don't make such assumptions. I do, however, have it on good authority that you most certainly are not male. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change > > > > And, he called me a "he". I am so not a he. > ~ > -K.Borndale > Network Administrator > Sybari Software > 631.630.8569 -direct dial > 631.439.0689 -fax > http://www.sybari.com > "One man's ceiling is another man's floor" > > > |+---> > || Roger Seielstad | > || || e.com> | > || Sent by: | > || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| > || .swynk.com | > || | > || | > || 10/24/2001 10:36 AM | > || Please respond to| > || "Exchange Discussions" | > || | > |+---> > > >- > -- > -| > | > >| > | To: "Exchange Discussions" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > | cc: > >| > | Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change > >| > > >- > -- > -| > > > > > Because in your message, you asked Kelly, a Sybari employee, for > information > comparing two of her company's competitors products to each other. > > I would suggest going to Norton and Trend Micro and asking them the > question. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT > Senior Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems > Atlanta, GA > http://www.peregrine.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change > > > > > > The reason Microsoft Will have a doc comparing birds to ants. > > > > > > What your Q has to do with my request > > Kelly said he have documents comparing two antivirus products. > > I assume he made some research on this subject in the past. > > Maybe he also has a table to compare Norton to Trend. > > I asked him. That's all. > > > > I hope you are not confused now. Feel free to email me offline > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday-Oct-01 21:13 > > Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change > > > > > > > Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to > > Trend? *confused* > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 1:48 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16 > > > > Subject: Re
RE: Freebusy?
Thanks. I'll do my reading now. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy? It's an Outlook command line switch. Q156982 Q182112 Q197180 Q296192 Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message----- > From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Freebusy? > > > Seriously, I have a question about cleanfreebusy. At the risk > of exposing my inexperienced status, what exactly is this > utility? Is it Exchange 5.5, 2K, or both? What does it do? > Where can I get it? I don't find it in the indices of any of > my books, never heard about it in my Official Microsoft > Curriculum class, either. > > Thanks, > Rob > > -Original Message- > From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:02 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Freebusy? > > > That's right! I forgot about that... > > I usually run delpart myself. ;o) > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Freebusy? > > > I thought you supposed to run fdisk when something odd happens? > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Freebusy? > > > > How does know when to run the cleanfreebusy? > > Something odd happens in a calendar and you say, "I have no > idea... Maybe running cleanfreebusy will help." > > Chris > -- > Chris Scharff > Senior Sales Engineer > MessageOne > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Freebusy?
Seriously, I have a question about cleanfreebusy. At the risk of exposing my inexperienced status, what exactly is this utility? Is it Exchange 5.5, 2K, or both? What does it do? Where can I get it? I don't find it in the indices of any of my books, never heard about it in my Official Microsoft Curriculum class, either. Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy? That's right! I forgot about that... I usually run delpart myself. ;o) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy? I thought you supposed to run fdisk when something odd happens? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy? > How does know when to run the cleanfreebusy? Something odd happens in a calendar and you say, "I have no idea... Maybe running cleanfreebusy will help." Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinion on Backups
It seems like there's NO backup software anybody likes. Everytime someone mentions a brand, they get toasted. We use ArcServe (foisted on me by others). I'm not real wild about it, but I don't hate it either. But then I haven't had to do a major recovery with it yet. Their support is pretty poor, but so far the software has done the job for us (like I said, no disaster recoveries yet). I don't know that I'd go so far as to recommend it, but I wouldn't totally dis it either. Rob -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Do you always bet on the losing horse? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -Original Message- > From: Govindaraj Rangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18 October 2001 13:39 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups > > > I would bet on ArcServe. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Opinion on Backups > > > I've been looking at Backup software for out NT/2000/Exchange servers. > Right now we run Veritas Backup Exec but because of the poor > support (Pay > support sucks) and horriable Customer Service (They didn't have any > information on file about my company or purchases). I've > decided to choose > another brand of tape software. What I'd like to know is what you're > opinion is on the best software (Other then BE) to use with NT/2000 > including Exchange support. > > Thanks > -- > Craig Manske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > IS Manager > Stanek Tool > New Berlin, WI > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Joke
Do you like cement? Cement is pretty good stuff. Wish it ran faster. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Joke It's not an exchange joke or in haiku, so should we assume you accidentally sent it to this list instead of to the recycle bin? > -Original Message- > From: Usachev Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Joke > > > > > What's the name of future version of MS Windows? > > > > Maybe: > > > > Windows CE > > + > > Windows ME > > + > > Windows NT > > + > > ... > > -- > > Windows CEMENT > > > It will be FINE > > > Oleg > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Question
Hello all-- Is it possible to add a "Cancel" button to a dialog box in Outlook? Specifically, when a user accidentally clicks the close box for Outlook--thinking he's closing a message, but instead closing the whole program--Outlook asks if he wants to delete everything from his Deleted Items folder, with "Yes" or "No" being the only responses. Whichever one he clicks on, the program quits. So, can I add a "Cancel" button that would allow him to resume the program without quitting? Thanks, Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
Beat that! -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K TS-1000 (2k RAM, membrane keyboard, RF converter for BW TV) Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Well My first was a small computer called Lazar (I am not sure whether it is a major brand At that time) something which had a 64 KB of memory and GWBasic in its ROM. I Was damn Illiterate those days I did not knew how to find the configuration Of that "Toy" Then not to mention the Commodore ant ARC computer with 256 memory And no hard disk - 51/2 floppies. And that first floppy diskette of mine.. What trouble I went through to own that.. Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: Utegaard, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 22:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Yes, but I have all my enterprise data stored on cassettes via TRS-80. We have a storage warehouse just for them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Litton 4k drum memory all program loaded via paper tape. Don't drop the roll. - Original Message - From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:46 PM Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > HP 2100 > > 4K words of *core* memory, and a model 33 teletype w/ paper tape for program > storage. > > Have you ever loaded an OS at 110 baud? > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > PDP-11. > > Ed Crowley > Compaq Computer > > --- "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Man I remember the first computer I wrote my first > > Pascal program on. It > > was an 8086 PC with no hard disk and 256K of RAM. > > The code had different > > procedures for about 10 sorting algorithms and it > > was intended to be a tool > > for comparing how different algorithms performed > > with certain data sets. It > > had overwhelmed the CPU when I tried to compile it > > in Turbo pascal. Aah, > > the good old days... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Shields, Anthony > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:21 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > > > As sarcastic as it is. It is interesting, if one > > presumes, that the > > very machines we're mentioning were in fact our > > first 'computers'. For > > me, reading your emails is like walking down memory lane...TRS-80's > > , TI-99a? Or 994a?, TRS-80's with 384K of RAM, etc... > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:41 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > Ooh! Ooh! > > Can I get Colour Display for my TRS-80s? I've got a > > killer ap that I > > wrote in basic that draws these neato boxes on the > > screen and I have > > been aching to see it in full 8 bit colour! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Soysal, Serdar > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: 10/1/01 8:46 AM > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > You've got COLOR DISPLAY When did THAT come > > out? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rocky Stefano > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:31 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > > > You all lose. I've clustered 25 Atari 2600's and can > > now play Mission > > Impossible in 8bit color > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier > > Sent: October 1, 2001 8:29 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > > > Man, you're way too cutting-edge for me. I just use > > my VIC-20 and post > > to the local BBSs. And I can just copy my new > > software onto tapes... > > far more convenient than disks or CDs. > > > > Stephen > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Soysal, Serdar > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: 10/1/01 6:17 AM > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > That's too futuristic for me. I'm on Windows 3.0 > > and have a separate > > unix t
RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
I think you can buy one at your bank. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K What is a CD? -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Man, you're way too cutting-edge for me. I just use my VIC-20 and post to the local BBSs. And I can just copy my new software onto tapes... far more convenient than disks or CDs. Stephen -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/01 6:17 AM Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K That's too futuristic for me. I'm on Windows 3.0 and have a separate unix terminal running pine for email. Works great. Hardware costs are also low. You don't need no stinkin i386 class machines either. S. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K nope, I'm sticking with the tried and true Windows for workgroups and ms mail. it's great! :) -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Has anyone used these products? Any Problems Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird Problem w/OWA
Have him use his SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the username box, instead of his username (jsmith). -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird Problem w/OWA Not sure this message made it. Maybe someone else has experienced this. I have 1 user that can not log into OWA. His box has the right username associated to it. And all the spelling is right. When he logs into OWA to his mailbox it says can not connect to server. I can log in as me to his box so it CAN find the server. I did change his username in AD but there are other who have had username changes and they work. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager Question
Sure. If you've got E2K SP1 going, Mailbox Manager is already installed. Just no policies have been created. Open Exchange System Manager. Open Recipients. Right click Recipient Policies and choose New, Recipient Policy. Click the checkbox for Mailbox Manager Settings and then OK. On the General tab, be sure to Modify the Filter rules. (This is the step I omitted before.) I just left all the defaults. On the Mailbox Manager Settings tab, uncheck the items you don't want to process. Notice that the age and size limits are ANDed together. So if you want to delete anything older than 30 days, set the age for 30 days and the size for Any. For the first run it's a good idea to move things to the Deleted Items folder rather than delete them immediately. Then if things don't go right, you can get stuff back. Finally, go into Administrative Groups, your organization name, find your server (you have to set it up for every server separately) and right click it. Then choose Properties. Go to Mailbox Management tab and set the schedule, set what kind of report you want to get, and who will get it. That should do it. Rob -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question Rob, actually this article is about 5.5. Do you have the instructions for 2000? I should subscibe to Exchange 2000, if for nothing else to unlock those articles. Thanks Nathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert Moore Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question I guess I don't need to reply with instructions. I found that the thing I didn't do was set the Filter Rules to indicate what I wanted Mailbox Manager to process. I don't think that was in the article I originally read. Either that, or I just missed it. In any case, it all ran correctly lastnight. Rob -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question Thanks, no I have not read this. I'll have a look. Cheers Nathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question Did you read "Control Mailbox Size with Mailbox Manager" by Tony Redmond? The article is available in TechNet. Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 >>>-Original Message- >>>From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:28 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question >>> >>> >>>Rob, how did you set up the mailbox manager? >>> >>>I looked on Microsoft site and I did not find directions to setup. >>> >>>I am not subscribed to Exchange 2000 mag just windows 2000. >>> >>>Thanks >>> >>>Nathan >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert >>>Moore >>>Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:50 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: Mailbox Manager Question >>> >>> >>>We're running a single Exchange 2000 SP1 server. A couple of weeks >>>ago I enabled Mailbox Manager on it. Following the directions in the >>>July issue of Exchange Administrator Magazine, I set it up to run >>>on Saturday >>>at midnight, and told it to delete anything in the Inbox, Sent Items, >>>and Deleted Items folders that is older than 30 days. I also >>>set it to >>>send me a detailed report. >>> >>>Everytime it runs, though, all I get is this: >>>The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed >>>processing >>>mailboxes >>>Started at: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:31:02 AM >>>Completed at:Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:31:05 AM >>>Mailboxes processed: 0 >>>Messages moved: 0 >>>Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB >>>Deleted messages:0 >>>Size of deleted messages:0.00 KB >>> >>>
RE: Mailbox Manager Question
I guess I don't need to reply with instructions. I found that the thing I didn't do was set the Filter Rules to indicate what I wanted Mailbox Manager to process. I don't think that was in the article I originally read. Either that, or I just missed it. In any case, it all ran correctly lastnight. Rob -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question Thanks, no I have not read this. I'll have a look. Cheers Nathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question Did you read "Control Mailbox Size with Mailbox Manager" by Tony Redmond? The article is available in TechNet. Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 >>>-Original Message- >>>From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:28 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Question >>> >>> >>>Rob, how did you set up the mailbox manager? >>> >>>I looked on Microsoft site and I did not find directions to setup. >>> >>>I am not subscribed to Exchange 2000 mag just windows 2000. >>> >>>Thanks >>> >>>Nathan >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >>>Robert Moore >>>Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:50 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: Mailbox Manager Question >>> >>> >>>We're running a single Exchange 2000 SP1 server. A couple of >>>weeks ago I >>>enabled Mailbox Manager on it. Following the directions in the July >>>issue of Exchange Administrator Magazine, I set it up to run >>>on Saturday >>>at midnight, and told it to delete anything in the Inbox, Sent Items, >>>and Deleted Items folders that is older than 30 days. I also >>>set it to >>>send me a detailed report. >>> >>>Everytime it runs, though, all I get is this: >>>The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed >>>processing >>>mailboxes >>>Started at: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:31:02 AM >>>Completed at:Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:31:05 AM >>>Mailboxes processed: 0 >>>Messages moved: 0 >>>Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB >>>Deleted messages:0 >>>Size of deleted messages:0.00 KB >>> >>> >>> >>>Any ideas where I might have gone wrong? >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Rob >>>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>>Rob Moore >>>Network Administrator >>>The Agnes Irwin School >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?
No problem--at least not getting to it. I'm not an AOL user, so I can't log in. Rob -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE? Subject line says it all! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Manager Question
We're running a single Exchange 2000 SP1 server. A couple of weeks ago I enabled Mailbox Manager on it. Following the directions in the July issue of Exchange Administrator Magazine, I set it up to run on Saturday at midnight, and told it to delete anything in the Inbox, Sent Items, and Deleted Items folders that is older than 30 days. I also set it to send me a detailed report. Everytime it runs, though, all I get is this: The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:31:02 AM Completed at: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:31:05 AM Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB Any ideas where I might have gone wrong? Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSN
I haven't noticed anything yet with MSN, but the Yahoo site is extremely slow today. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSN I just heard on CNN that MSN is under cyber attack by hackers from the Middle East. [1] [1] Please note, the statement just made is completely fabricated and totally devoid of any truth. However, based on the level of validation checking that the current news agencies are exhibiting [2], I'm fully expecting to have this bit of "news" appear on one of the cable channels within the next 4 hours. [2] If Peter Jennings reported it, it must be true. [3] [3] Hi Sherry -Original Message- From: Barry Horner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSN Their server[s] = out of disk space. Or so states the error messages returned from them. Barry -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:MSN Is anyone else having problems sending mail to msn.com today? An MX lookup for msn.com returns: cpimssmtpa12.msn.com smtp-gw-4.msn.com I can't seem to establish an SMTP connection to either. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable ability to reply
Does everyone need to be able to send to the DL (but not reply to the sent message)? Or just the select few? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable ability to reply Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to a System Distribution List, and prevent the recipients from being able to reply to the message they receive. I did not think that this was possible. I used the "help" in Outlook 2000 and performed a couple of searches in Tech Net on the Web. Our user community has both Outlook 97 and 2000, and we are Exchange 5.5 with SP3. Please help or point in the correct direction. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: "Woodrick, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: XCH 2000 OWA
Your other alternative (which is what we do, as a very small institution) is to run E2K and OWA access on one box. Be sure to use SSL. Rob -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA There is no OWA 2000 "component" per se. Its not optional, its part of any E2k install. To create the Front End server, you would need to install Exch 2k EE, then check the "Front-End Server" box under properties. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 09:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA okay, bear with me here . . . assuming it installs in roughly the same way xch 5.5 owa does, I only install that owa component on the front-end iis server or do you have to do an "exchange 2k" install now + xch 2k owa? Or do you simply have to blow a XCH 2k EE license for any machine running owa in a front-end/back-end "enterprise strength" configuration? - Original Message - From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:13 AM Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA No, but to put OWA 2000 on a stand-alone Server you need to implement a Frontend/Backend solution which requires at least one Enterprise Edition for the Frontend server machine. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA > > OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition? > > - Original Message - > From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:57 AM > Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA > > > 1. To "put" OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an > Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition > 2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: XCH 2000 OWA > > > > Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K > OWA > > on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend? > > > > TIA . . . > > Chris > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS Front End to OWA 2000?
My understanding is that you must do a Front End/Back End arrangement, and you have to use the Enterprise version of Exchange 2000. The Front End box doesn't have to have much on it--no mailboxes, that is--but it has to have E2K on it. Rob -Original Message- From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Front End to OWA 2000? I'm currently in the early planning phase of an enterprise messaging rollout for a smallish company. I'm well-experienced with Exchange 5.5 and OWA and I've done my share of reading and research on Exchange 2000. The problem is that I've got a client with a pre-existing "fearofExchangeintheDMZ" disease. Since I obviously need to host whatever WWW service for OWA in the DMZ, I need some advice on the front end. Can a vanilla IIS 5.0 installation support the web services for OWA inside the corporate LAN? I've found plenty of info on doing OWA Front End/Back End configurations, but none on IIS-->OWA ones. Is this possible, or does IIS have problems authenticating? or are there ISAPI problems, etc? If this can't be done, I have no problems telling the client that I'm going to put Exchange in his DMZ and do a standard F/E B/E config but I'm going to have to convince him and his cronies that their AD and message store is still safe. Thanks. Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP question
That was pretty much my plan. But I thought I'd see if anybody had any other ideas first. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP question My answer to him would be "Sorry, we only support the company email system. You will need to work this out with Yahoo" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert Moore Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP question I have a user who, for some strange reason, likes to have his Yahoo account check his email on our Exchange server. (We offer OWA for our users when they're off site.) It was all working fine for him until recently when we upgraded from 5.5 to E2K SP1. Now his Yahoo account will only check for his mail if he tells it to check for all messages (as opposed to only new messages). Otherwise he gets an error message to the effect that the command (from Yahoo) to Retrieve New Messages Only was not recognized by our server. Any idea what might have caused this change and how to fix it? My books are unenlightening regarding POP issues. Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP question
I have a user who, for some strange reason, likes to have his Yahoo account check his email on our Exchange server. (We offer OWA for our users when they're off site.) It was all working fine for him until recently when we upgraded from 5.5 to E2K SP1. Now his Yahoo account will only check for his mail if he tells it to check for all messages (as opposed to only new messages). Otherwise he gets an error message to the effect that the command (from Yahoo) to Retrieve New Messages Only was not recognized by our server. Any idea what might have caused this change and how to fix it? My books are unenlightening regarding POP issues. Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Quirkiness
Where does that NT group "Everyone" exist, though? (I can't find it in
any of my OUs.) And if it's mail enabled, why can't I email to it?
-Original Message-
From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K Quirkiness
the NT group "everyone" has probably become mail-enabled and is now your
"everyone" distribution list
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Quirkiness
On Friday we did a successful upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP3 to Exchange
2000 SP1. (Thanks, those of you who chipped in with advice.) One
quirkiness has surfaced, though. We had a distribution list ("Everyone")
that included everyone at the school. That list was not replicated to
the new server. However, when I tried to re-create it from scratch, I
get the message that it already exists. You can't mail to it, but
somehow Exchange thinks it does exist.
In any case, I just created a new one and called it "Everybody." So I'm
mostly just curious to know if anyone has any idea about where
"Everyone" has gone.
Thanks,
Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rob Moore
Network Administrator
The Agnes Irwin School
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Quirkiness
On Friday we did a successful upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP3 to Exchange
2000 SP1. (Thanks, those of you who chipped in with advice.) One
quirkiness has surfaced, though. We had a distribution list ("Everyone")
that included everyone at the school. That list was not replicated to
the new server. However, when I tried to re-create it from scratch, I
get the message that it already exists. You can't mail to it, but
somehow Exchange thinks it does exist.
In any case, I just created a new one and called it "Everybody." So I'm
mostly just curious to know if anyone has any idea about where
"Everyone" has gone.
Thanks,
Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rob Moore
Network Administrator
The Agnes Irwin School
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector setup
What we decided to do (just now) is create a folder for all the contacts (we have a lot of them--our students who do not have Exchange accounts, but are just Custom Recipients) and groups, and then let it run. It worked perfectly. Thanks for your input. I may have more questions as the day goes by. Rob -Original Message- From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector setup You can't have multiple user accounts with the same ID no matter how many OU's you have and no matter what OU you setup for ADC replication. If you are talking about an E2k upgrade after a Win2k migration then you could definitely make use of the temp OU as a sort of staging area for sorting out where all the id's go. The temp OU just doesn't make much sense for an on going administration type setup. Phil > That (the one way connection) seems fine for when the > conversion is already > done. But what about during the upgrade process (from 5.5 to > 2000) when we > have to get all the info off the Exchange 5.5 server into AD? > > When Exchange replicates with AD, does it search all of AD > regardless of the > default OU for the corresponding user account? And if it does > not find a > user account, does it then create a new account in the > specified default OU? > > If this is right, then a temporary OU makes a lot of sense. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector setup
That (the one way connection) seems fine for when the conversion is already done. But what about during the upgrade process (from 5.5 to 2000) when we have to get all the info off the Exchange 5.5 server into AD? When Exchange replicates with AD, does it search all of AD regardless of the default OU for the corresponding user account? And if it does not find a user account, does it then create a new account in the specified default OU? If this is right, then a temporary OU makes a lot of sense. Rob -Original Message- From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector setup I'm not really sure. It is pretty easy to setup the Windows->Exchange connection to go from multiple OU's into one Recipient Container, but I don't see any way to determine what OU to put accounts in if you are coming from one Recipient Container to Multiple OU's. A work around would be to create a temp OU where new accounts from Exchange get created and manually move them to the appropriate OU. Not a great solution though. Personally I wouldn't bother with a two-way, I'd just create the accounts in AD and have the ADC create the Mailbox. Anyone else here have any ideas? > We have one Exchange 5.5 Recipients container, and multiple > AD OUs. How do > we do a two-way replication? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector setup
We have one Exchange 5.5 Recipients container, and multiple AD OUs. How do we do a two-way replication? Rob -Original Message- From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector setup The connection agreement goes from one Exchange Recipient container to one Win2k OU. We are likely going to setup our system as a one way from Win2k->Exchange that way no matter what OU it comes from it will get created in the right Exchange Recipient container. For a bulk load (ie: if you are using the ADC to populate your AD with users) create a temporary import OU and then move the users into the right OU as you go along your migration. Phil > I'm in the middle of setting up my first Recipient Connection > Agreement, and > I'm still a bit confused. On the "From Exchange" tab, you > have to choose a > "Default destination." Since we have multiple OUs in our AD, > do I choose our > site, instead of an individual OU? Or is the "Default > destination" just > where it creates accounts it doesn't know what else to do > with? (In which > case I would just choose a convenient OU.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC connector setup
I'm in the middle of setting up my first Recipient Connection Agreement, and I'm still a bit confused. On the "From Exchange" tab, you have to choose a "Default destination." Since we have multiple OUs in our AD, do I choose our site, instead of an individual OU? Or is the "Default destination" just where it creates accounts it doesn't know what else to do with? (In which case I would just choose a convenient OU.) Thanks, Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC Question
Once you've upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to 2000, do you leave the ADC in place? Or, once the upgrade is complete, has it outlived its usefulness? Thanks, Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid E2K upgrade question
Ah. I knew it was a stupid question. I'm just trying to head off problems before I actually do the upgrade. Thanks. Rob -Original Message- From: Brent Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Stupid E2K upgrade question You can add multiple containers in both the "from Exchange" and "from Windows" tabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid E2K upgrade question
In the Exchange Server "In-Place Upgrade from Microsoft Exchange 5.5 to Microsoft Exchange 2000" white paper, there's a section (page 10) that talks about creating ADC connection agreements. It talks about setting up a Recipient Connection Agreement and whatnot. It says "On the From Exchange and From Windows tabs, enter the name of the Exchange recipients container that contains your recipients." Now here's my question. I don't understand the next sentence in the paper. It says, "Also enter the Organizational Unit that contains your Active Directory users." What does this mean? We have six OUs. The bulk of our Exchange users are in two of them. Which one do I pick? Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
