RE: Exchange 2003 backups
Exchange 2003 pst files larger than 2gig are possible I believe. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups I have a PST larger than 2GB FWIW. Seems to work fine. Yes, I'm mostly just being difficult. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:47 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups Matthew, you will find that the PST=BAD has become religious dogma on this list. In reality, PST files are just another tool, and much like any other tool (inclined plane, fire, chainsaw, etc) they are neither inherently good nor evil. On the other hand, while PST files can serve a useful purpose, they are definitely in the chainsaw category of tools. They can be handy for some situations, but they need respect, and users of PST files must understand their limitations. PST files cannot hit the 2GB file size. If they do, you will corrupt the PST, and will need a special recovery tool to get back SOME of the data in the PST. I have heard rumors that the corruption can occur well before the 2GB mark, so we tell any of our PST users to stay below 1GB. PST files cannot be backed up while they are open. Any users we have with PST files run a startup script that zips their PST to a file server[1], then runs Outlook after the zip is done. You, as the email admin, have no visibility into these PST files. You cannot, for example, use exmerge to delete infected emails as you could if they were in the store. [1] The argument could be made here to remove disk space from the file server, add it to the exchange server, and don't use the PST file. This certainly should be done if possible, but isn't always practical. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Joyce Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups yes, this is my concern. The main part of my question was what to backup and how often. ...and retention setting for mailboxes and deleted items. I need to figure out a robust policy which won't need tobe changed 6 months because of store bloating. Import all those PSTs is just not something I'm prepared to do. I can see, that had I not used PSTs and used bigger mailboxes (not something I could have done, predecessor, etc) then staff would be forced to managed their mail better. Matt -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups Really big hard drives is how we do it. Our users keep the mail they need and are encouraged to dispose of the mail they don't need. Occasionally they do. Of course, we have the luxury of having an abundance of storage space on our Exchange servers the bigger challenge is the effect those large information stores can have on backups and restores. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups I'd recommend a public folder. That way, not only do you have access to email from years ago, but all users (with correct permissions) have access, instead of only the user who has it in a PST. Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Joyce Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they considered bad ? How else can I give users access to email from 2 years ago ? yes, they do need to access these. What do other organisations do ? Matt -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups PST = Bad. themolk. -Original Message- From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 backups Hi, I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. It is a single server setup. I used to use BackupExec+Exchange agent to backup to a DLT. The stores
RE: Best backup software for Exchange
I have used both veritas and CA and I must say while both are excellent I prefer the GFS rotation of CA. As far as the interface I have no problem with it. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange Have you seen a mental health professional lately? I had the decidedly unfortunate experience to have inherited ArcServe when I started here. And I'll freely admit that I was able to get it to both backup and restore both files and Exchange databases. It took 10 times longer to set up and administer than BackupExec had, and had one of the worst GUI concepts I've ever seen in a product. But it did work, if you beat it just right, in the right sequence, at the right times. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange Funny you should say that. I love my CA Arcserve. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange Anything not from CA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tigue Williams Posted At: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Best backup software for Exchange Subject: Best backup software for Exchange We are looking at Networker and NetBackup for enterprise backup solutions. We would like to so the usual mailbox backup and also snap backups from SAN BCV's. I would like to hear from the members about these two products before we actually go ahead with the purchase. We are using 5.5 and will likely go with 2000 or 2003. We are migrating to a SAN as well. Is there any way to do mailbox backup from the BCV itself? TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best backup software for Exchange
Funny you should say that. I love my CA Arcserve. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange Anything not from CA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tigue Williams Posted At: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Best backup software for Exchange Subject: Best backup software for Exchange We are looking at Networker and NetBackup for enterprise backup solutions. We would like to so the usual mailbox backup and also snap backups from SAN BCV's. I would like to hear from the members about these two products before we actually go ahead with the purchase. We are using 5.5 and will likely go with 2000 or 2003. We are migrating to a SAN as well. Is there any way to do mailbox backup from the BCV itself? TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
removal of first exchange 2000 server
I have had a mixed exch 2000/2003 site running for about a month. I have followed the Q article regarding removal of first exchange server in a site. Now some of my clients are having issues when accessing their mailbox's. outlook is set for their mailbox to point to the new server and outlook opens but clicking inbox locks outlook. I have tried repairing outlook and upgrading it to 2003 but nothing fix's it. Any info would be appreciated. Exchange 2003 on windows 2003 cluster. Removed server is exchange 2000 on windows 2000 non cluster Client outlook xp/2003 Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: removal of first exchange 2000 server
It turns out that the default gal wasn't re-homed. I had to fix that, change the expansion server of my distro lists and uninstall exchange from my old server. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: removal of first exchange 2000 server What happens when you generate them a new profile? Joshua Morgan AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: removal of first exchange 2000 server I have had a mixed exch 2000/2003 site running for about a month. I have followed the Q article regarding removal of first exchange server in a site. Now some of my clients are having issues when accessing their mailbox's. outlook is set for their mailbox to point to the new server and outlook opens but clicking inbox locks outlook. I have tried repairing outlook and upgrading it to 2003 but nothing fix's it. Any info would be appreciated. Exchange 2003 on windows 2003 cluster. Removed server is exchange 2000 on windows 2000 non cluster Client outlook xp/2003 Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange client or mapi
Links are dead off the site. I also noted that windows messaging is available form pss. $250 for a non y2k compliant piece of software. Lol. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nikki Peterson Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange client or mapi Sue Mosher's SlipStick site has the XCNG Client: http://www.slipstick.com/clients.htm#ex Nikki -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange client or mapi I sent the Exchange 4 client offline. - Original Message - From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:28 PM Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi Tried profman2. doesn't create a profile. I do NOT want outlook. Can't find the old exchange client anywhere. My exchange 200 server does not have any client installed and I can create a profile no problem. The e2k3 is the issue. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi He'll still need a profile however. Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure. http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profin st.exe -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server was not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is safe to use From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange client or mapi Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500 When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler. Is there a way to change this. I need a profile for Arcserves alert service. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange client or mapi
When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler. Is there a way to change this. I need a profile for Arcserves alert service. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange client or mapi
Tried profman2. doesn't create a profile. I do NOT want outlook. Can't find the old exchange client anywhere. My exchange 200 server does not have any client installed and I can create a profile no problem. The e2k3 is the issue. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi He'll still need a profile however. Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure. http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profin st.e xe -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server was not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is safe to use From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange client or mapi Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500 When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler. Is there a way to change this. I need a profile for Arcserves alert service. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shop online for kids' toys by age group, price range, and toy category at MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange client or mapi
Yeah my emails seem to be lagged. Thanks missy Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange client or mapi I sent the Exchange 4 client offline. - Original Message - From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:28 PM Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi Tried profman2. doesn't create a profile. I do NOT want outlook. Can't find the old exchange client anywhere. My exchange 200 server does not have any client installed and I can create a profile no problem. The e2k3 is the issue. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi He'll still need a profile however. Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure. http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profin st.e xe -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server was not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is safe to use From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange client or mapi Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500 When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler. Is there a way to change this. I need a profile for Arcserves alert service. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shop online for kids' toys by age group, price range, and toy category at MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
My workstations are the only place I can create mb's through ad from. My servers do not have any info in their ad uc's to create ANY exchange info. Yet my exchange operates fine. Any ideas. Or is this normal. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Oh, I dunno - useful ammunition if anyone wants to comment on whether or not EDS should be used for an outsourcing gig. It's going into _my_ save file. G. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the dirty wash here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different accounts as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Chris, Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the contract is being held to ransom. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. -Original Message- From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Mail mjgration Hi, I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some description they can pass on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
RE: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
I can create a user anywhere but theres no exchange tasks available. Also now ive noticed when I create a user no mailbox is created even though it says it is. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's Are you saying you don't have the ability to create a new user? Is advanced features viewing turned on? The next time you post use a fresh thread. - Original Message - From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's My workstations are the only place I can create mb's through ad from. My servers do not have any info in their ad uc's to create ANY exchange info. Yet my exchange operates fine. Any ideas. Or is this normal. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Native 2000 ad groups
Is it ok to move the ad admin groups for exchange after you have gone to native ex2k? Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Entire Domain's E-Mail into one Mailbox
Why couldn't you just set up the admin mailbox to retrieve any errors. I would think if exchange couldn't find a recipient it would default to the admin box. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 8:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Entire Domain's E-Mail into one Mailbox Is there a way to have a mailbox in Exchange 2000 to receive mail for a entire domain regardless of what is before the @domain.com. There is a good reason for this. I have a very good friend of mine that had a company. The company is going out of business, believe that or not. I have moved his domain over to my DNS servers, and setup my Exchange server to receive his domain's e-mail. His company had about 200 employees with e-mail addresses, which is way more than I care to sit and enter as aliases. Please tell me that there is a way to do this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro
Duh Uninstall the .net tools Install win2k Install esm Uninstall win2k tools Re-install .net tools Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro Thanks again but I originally installed the Win2k tools after I installed the .NET ones and they did not behave well together. I have since reinstalled the OS and was hoping to avoid that fun again. I guess TS it is. Oh Joy... Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Davis,Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro David, I have installed the ESM on XP. You must first install the Win2K administration tools. Just ignore the error that states they can't be installed. Once they are installed, you can then install ESM. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro According to Q312139 titled You Cannot Install Exchange System Manager on a Windows XP-Based Computer, MS tells you that you basically have to run Exchange tools on a different machine if you have an XP workstation. I was able to install the old 5.5 admin with no troubles but whenever I try to install E2k admin tools (we only purchased the E2k upgrade if that matters) I get the exact message mentioned in that article and it won't let me. Also, according to Q284224 you will not see the Exchange-related tasks in Active Directory Users Computers until you install the ESM. Herein lies my problem. If you can't add the ESM to an XP machine and you can't utilize Exchange tasks unless you install the ESM, you basically cannot use an XP workstation to administer Exchange? Lastly, I'm assuming that the Active Directory Connector MMC also falls under this same thought process? Any input would be appreciated. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LegacyExchangeDN
What I did was on my recovery server I ran forest prep then installed ONLY the exchange sys admin. You can then go into it and install your appropriate admin group that matches you prod net. It's easier than changing all those exchangelegacydn's Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LegacyExchangeDN I'm trying to recover my store to alternative (non-production) server. Does anyone know where I can find LegacyExchangeDN value in the active directory on my production servers. Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The day after superbowl
Any sport that you cant hit someone with a chair is garbage. :) Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Curling may not be as high speed or as violent as ice hockey, but it can be exciting none the less. Mike (former curler) -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 17:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl A good friend of mine has been a volunteer with the Salt Lake City olympic committee for years, and has been doing tons of work in preparation. Guess what he is assigned to do for the duration of the games...He gets to keep an eye on radio and TV communications at the curling event, which apparently is the longest event of the games (like 14 days or something). If for any reason there happens to be *ANY* TV or radio broadcast from the curling site, don't be suprised to hear giggling in the background from him as he watches grown men chase a big sinker down an ice runway desperately sweeping stuff out from in front of it. The giggling will be coming from a guy named Bob. If he isn't giggling, he'll be snoring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Levis Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:13 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: The day after superbowl I haven't seen a good curling match in years =) -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl actually, we very much understand baseball. it's almost identical to a traditional english sport called 'rounders' - except this is mainly played in school by girls. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 16:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl It's pretty popular in Latin America, Japan and Taiwan as well. Nobody expects you to understand it any more than we understand Cricket. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl A man convinced against his will, Is of the same opinion still. You're all right and you're all wrong. However, I still don't understand the world series baseball, or whatever it's called, that only has 1 country playing it (or is it 2 with Canada?) :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Kishore Vara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: The day after superbowl Subject: RE: The day after superbowl You might change your mind if you watch Manchester United play.. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday
Exch2k disable account
Has anyone experienced this. I disabled and employees account and now his mailbox is not accessible. I re enabled the account and the same thing cant access it. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
Changed the exchange iis website to anonymous now I get page can not be displayed even when I change it back I get nothing. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
RE: Help please
Woops. Thanks. OK I did that and it has the same result. Pops up the login box repeatedly. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Basic authentication. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:07 AM Subject: RE: Help please Changed the exchange iis website to anonymous now I get page can not be displayed even when I change it back I get nothing. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Help please
Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday
RE: Help please
Sorry PIX. And according to cisco and show ver I have 16mb. I would install it but cisco wont even let me dl it off their site. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message
RE: Help please
Version 5.3(5) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please What version are you on now? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That doesnt make any sense. Download the file to a server running tftp. Tftp the image to your router? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Help please
Yes I have a cco login that's where it blocks me. Pix 515 Web site says that it comes with 16mb but 6.0 requires 32mb I really appreciate all the help. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Which model of the PIX do you have? D Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun. -Don Marquis -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Version 5.3(5) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please What version are you on now? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That doesnt make any sense. Download the file to a server running tftp. Tftp the image to your router? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same
RE: Help please
Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL
RE: Help please
I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points
RE: Help please
When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461) tahoe is the internal exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman
RE: Help please
That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix are the prob not the exchange server. Yes that ip is a dialup client -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the logs when you try to pass authentication? D A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461) tahoe is the internal exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM
RE: Help please
Yes it is set to the server name -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Are you using an host headers on your IIS Server? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the logs when you try to pass authentication? D A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461) tahoe is the internal exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM
RE: Help please
I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the PIX is telling you to fsck off. That 172 address HAS to be routed to a routable IP address! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix are the prob not the exchange server. Yes that ip is a dialup client -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the logs when you try to pass authentication? D A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461) tahoe is the internal exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem
RE: Help please
Yes internal works fine. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, Can you login to OWA from your internal network ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:13 AM Subject: RE: Help please Yes it is set to the server name -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Are you using an host headers on your IIS Server? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the logs when you try to pass authentication? D A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461) tahoe is the internal exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please
RE: Help please
Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the PIX is telling you to fsck off. That 172 address HAS to be routed to a routable IP address! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix are the prob not the exchange server. Yes that ip is a dialup client -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the logs when you try to pass authentication? D A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461) tahoe is the internal exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Help please
Yes my bad sorry. I do and I just received ios 6.0. maybe ill do that tonight. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ronald, the 16MB you see is for the flash memory, not the RAM. I just looked on their site. You should have at least 32MB of RAM in there. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/fw.htm D Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun. -Don Marquis -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a Pix 515 that I run 6.1 on.. I thought they only shipper with 32mb as a minimum.. You should be able to download IOS versions with a valid cco, regardless of what PIX model you have.. ~John - -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes I have a cco login that's where it blocks me. Pix 515 Web site says that it comes with 16mb but 6.0 requires 32mb I really appreciate all the help. - -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Which model of the PIX do you have? D Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun. -Don Marquis - -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Version 5.3(5) - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please What version are you on now? - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That doesnt make any sense. Download the file to a server running tftp. Tftp the image to your router? - -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS - -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt - -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say
RE: Help please
No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get locked out with the bad login attempts? D May you have the foresight to know where you're going, the hindsight to know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far. -Irish Toast -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the PIX is telling you to fsck off. That 172 address HAS to be routed to a routable IP address! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix are the prob not the exchange server. Yes that ip is a dialup client -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the logs when you try to pass authentication? D A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461) tahoe is the internal exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From
RE: Help please
I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get locked out with the bad login attempts? D May you have the foresight to know where you're going, the hindsight to know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far. -Irish Toast -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the PIX is telling you to fsck off. That 172 address HAS to be routed to a routable IP address! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix are the prob not the exchange server. Yes that ip is a dialup client -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the logs when you try to pass authentication? D A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log 2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET /scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008
RE: Help please
Had to install kiwi enterprise syslog. Did everythin stated but no info is logged to the syslog server -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Logging is fairly straight forward. Telnet to device and add the following lines logging on logging timestamp logging trap errors logging history errors logging facility 7 logging host inside (internal_ip) Your logging host inside needs to be running compliant software. Complaint defined as listening on TCP Port 1468 and UDP 514. I can recommend the PIX Firewall Syslog Server. Download from Cisco Website. Install on a local machine. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please OK, let us know what you find. D DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up. As for proxy I am attempting that now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX. Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly... D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am beginning to think this is a proxy problem. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than 16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB. D Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option, brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb in my router. Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to 6.0 IOS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work. D The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Don, I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix , but never heard of any with http. Ronald, The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is working, call Ci$co. /Peter - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Help please That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always, but I've seen it. D Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help please Ronald, If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http. period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but Basic. If I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ? /Peter - Original
RE: Help please
Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) ftp (internal_ip2) ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 443 (internal_ip1) 443 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 90 (internal_ip3) 90 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get locked out with the bad login attempts? D May you have the foresight to know where you're going, the hindsight to know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far. -Irish Toast -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the PIX is telling you to fsck off. That 172 address HAS to be routed to a routable IP address! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto
RE: Help please
Yeah that's what I figured. Damn Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config. Aren't there issues with those. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You need more IP addresses. You're trying to do waay too much with waaay too little. D The most satisfying thing in life is to have been able to give a large part of one's self to others. -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) ftp (internal_ip2) ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 443 (internal_ip1) 443 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 90 (internal_ip3) 90 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get locked out with the bad login attempts? D May you have the foresight to know where you're going, the hindsight to know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far. -Irish Toast -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping
RE: Help please
1 ip was all uunet would give us at the time so I was told. I just contacted them about it and they are a pain in the arse to get ip's from apparently. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit statement... 1 IP address??? Might I ask why? D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get locked out with the bad login attempts? D May you have the foresight to know where you're going, the hindsight to know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far. -Irish Toast -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the PIX is telling you to fsck off. That 172 address HAS to be routed to a routable IP address! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix are the prob not the exchange server. Yes that ip is a dialup client -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday
RE: Help please
This is the only thing the syslog server got .226 looks like a vpn addy. Outside I have no idea. 12-18-2001 12:45:03News.Error 172.16.1.2 Dec 18 2001 09:57:13: %PIX-3-305006: regular translation creation failed for udp src inside:192.168.5.226/1350 dst outside:24.3.196.33/53 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit statement... 1 IP address??? Might I ask why? D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get locked out with the bad login attempts? D May you have the foresight to know where you're going, the hindsight to know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far. -Irish Toast -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the PIX is telling you to fsck off. That 172 address HAS to be routed to a routable IP address! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix
RE: Help please
I am going to look for info right now on the port change for owa. My 1 problem is if I add a statement static inside outside with port 90 will that interfere with my other statement that maps everything to my proxy server. It is DMZ capable BUT not set up. Here is a quick and dirty diag of the set up Router Pix Proxy --- internal network containing exchange Between the inside of the pix and the outside of the proxy is the 172.16.1.0 net and the internal network is 192.168.0.0 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You need to get additional IP addresses. You need one IP bound to the external interface as your PAT Address only. You need additional IP's for services with duplicate ports running on different servers. Or, you can do something sneaky like setup your owa site on a different http port like 100 or 90 then use the static commands to send port 100 or 90 traffic to the internal system. Then, just have your users append a :90 to the end of the url. Pretty simple idea but effective. I do find it strange that UUNet only supplied one IP addresses although this seems to be the direction were headed until implementation of IPv6. Is this a 3 port Pix 515? Running in a DMZ config. That would account for the two private IP networks. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh So you have wo different private IP schema's on your network? Are they aware of each other? D Cluelessness: There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Vpn dhcp ip for RAS -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please What is that 192.x.x.x address for? D There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please This is the only thing the syslog server got .226 looks like a vpn addy. Outside I have no idea. 12-18-2001 12:45:03News.Error 172.16.1.2 Dec 18 2001 09:57:13: %PIX-3-305006: regular translation creation failed for udp src inside:192.168.5.226/1350 dst outside:24.3.196.33/53 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit statement... 1 IP address??? Might I ask why? D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now
RE: Help please
Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns points to the single ip address I was using. What I will need to do is change the mx record to point to my extra ip and static map it. Also the fixups in my config on the pix does include port 25 and 80 but when I do a no fixup on them and write t they return. Weird. Guys you have been a big help I owe you all one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not need though... D The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first. (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Oh yea -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah that's what I figured. Damn Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config. Aren't there issues with those. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You need more IP addresses. You're trying to do waay too much with waaay too little. D The most satisfying thing in life is to have been able to give a large part of one's self to others. -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) ftp (internal_ip2) ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 443 (internal_ip1) 443 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 90 (internal_ip3) 90 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange
RE: Help please
Alrighty guys I have added a dns entry and an ip address for the owa. Also I added port 90 to the existing exchange owa server. Did the static commands. All left now is to wait for it to propagate and we'll see. This will still work right even though the outside ip static maps to the inside imp through another subnet. I would assume the proxy will just pass it along. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about? One query, got three responses... I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q194131 D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server. There is a knowldedge base article on this. Use www.google.com to search for it. I would not use M$ search site. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns points to the single ip address I was using. What I will need to do is change the mx record to point to my extra ip and static map it. Also the fixups in my config on the pix does include port 25 and 80 but when I do a no fixup on them and write t they return. Weird. Guys you have been a big help I owe you all one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not need though... D The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first. (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Oh yea -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah that's what I figured. Damn Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config. Aren't there issues with those. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You need more IP addresses. You're trying to do waay too much with waaay too little. D The most satisfying thing in life is to have been able to give a large part of one's self to others. -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) ftp (internal_ip2) ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 443 (internal_ip1) 443 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 90 (internal_ip3) 90 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions
RE: Help please
Well the solution I created is nto going to work. You can map inside out through the proxy to another net. It has no idea where to go.. figured this put because the pix can not ping the exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about? One query, got three responses... I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q194131 D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server. There is a knowldedge base article on this. Use www.google.com to search for it. I would not use M$ search site. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns points to the single ip address I was using. What I will need to do is change the mx record to point to my extra ip and static map it. Also the fixups in my config on the pix does include port 25 and 80 but when I do a no fixup on them and write t they return. Weird. Guys you have been a big help I owe you all one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not need though... D The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first. (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Oh yea -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah that's what I figured. Damn Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config. Aren't there issues with those. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You need more IP addresses. You're trying to do waay too much with waaay too little. D The most satisfying thing in life is to have been able to give a large part of one's self to others. -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) ftp (internal_ip2) ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 443 (internal_ip1) 443 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 90 (internal_ip3) 90 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different
RE: Help please
Not even when im using the pix itself to ping? I can ping the proxy that is on the same net as the pix. Prob cant ping through the proxy though huh. Do I need a route entry ie Route add inside 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 1 Internalproxy external -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You cannot ping through a pix. You would have to add a ICMP any any to your ACL. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Well the solution I created is nto going to work. You can map inside out through the proxy to another net. It has no idea where to go.. figured this put because the pix can not ping the exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about? One query, got three responses... I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q194131 D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server. There is a knowldedge base article on this. Use www.google.com to search for it. I would not use M$ search site. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns points to the single ip address I was using. What I will need to do is change the mx record to point to my extra ip and static map it. Also the fixups in my config on the pix does include port 25 and 80 but when I do a no fixup on them and write t they return. Weird. Guys you have been a big help I owe you all one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not need though... D The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first. (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Oh yea -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah that's what I figured. Damn Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config. Aren't there issues with those. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You need more IP addresses. You're trying to do waay too much with waaay too little. D The most satisfying thing in life is to have been able to give a large part of one's self to others. -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) ftp (internal_ip2) ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 443 (internal_ip1) 443 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 90 (internal_ip3) 90 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Original
RE: Help please
I think we are missing something. There is no possible way to not go through proxy. Hes is the only box that sees pix. Direct cable from pix internal to proxy external Proxy --Pix --router/internet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah. I specifically stated not to map to your proxy first. Send straight to the 192.168.x.x of the OWA Box. ALso, you need to modify a few things on this box. This box should have one nic. I'm assuming the pix is connected to your lan. The OWA box needs to point to the pix as it's default gateway. Assign the DNS from your ISP to the OWA Box. Use static routes for local routing issues. If you perform these steps as I'm telling you then it will work. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Well the solution I created is nto going to work. You can map inside out through the proxy to another net. It has no idea where to go.. figured this put because the pix can not ping the exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about? One query, got three responses... I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q194131 D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server. There is a knowldedge base article on this. Use www.google.com to search for it. I would not use M$ search site. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns points to the single ip address I was using. What I will need to do is change the mx record to point to my extra ip and static map it. Also the fixups in my config on the pix does include port 25 and 80 but when I do a no fixup on them and write t they return. Weird. Guys you have been a big help I owe you all one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not need though... D The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first. (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Oh yea -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah that's what I figured. Damn Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config. Aren't there issues with those. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please You need more IP addresses. You're trying to do waay too much with waaay too little. D The most satisfying thing in life is to have been able to give a large part of one's self to others. -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255
RE: Help please
mmm. proxy will not have to network cards just one huh. Ok that's something to think about. Pix goes straight to lan as an ip. Ok no big deal. But YES I am using proxy for access control and this is a must. Will this work in this situation. I don't know. Again I have to think about this. No the pix has no 192.168 ip associated with it. What about this though. Leave the proxy for access control and outgoing internet. Use the dmz interface to connect to the lan directly and re configure to have all mx and web sites go throught the dmz interface. Is this opening me up to the world though? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please It sounds like your PIX is configured wrong. Your proxy is configured wrong for this config too. The center point in this equation should be your PIX. It does not sound like your using the DMZ so use the following strategy. Your Proxy is currently multihomed. Disable the external interface (I'm assuming your using W2k). Your probably using the proxy to control internet access only. Dunno, you tell me. No reason to cache so turn that feature off. If your filtering ports you can turn that off too. One network card that has the PIX as the default gateway and dns supplied by your ISP. Make sure the PIX is connected to your LAN (192.168.x.x). Make the modifications as stated above and previous email to your owa and proxy server. You should not be able to ping from the pix to your servers assuming you have setup your route entries correctly on the PIX: EXAMPLE: Typical config route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (ISP_Gateway) 1 (Default Route for Outside Interface) The Internal interface knows to send 192.168.0.0 stuff to this network assuming you assigned a 192.168.0.0 address to the internal interface. Has this been done? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah. I specifically stated not to map to your proxy first. Send straight to the 192.168.x.x of the OWA Box. ALso, you need to modify a few things on this box. This box should have one nic. I'm assuming the pix is connected to your lan. The OWA box needs to point to the pix as it's default gateway. Assign the DNS from your ISP to the OWA Box. Use static routes for local routing issues. If you perform these steps as I'm telling you then it will work. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Well the solution I created is nto going to work. You can map inside out through the proxy to another net. It has no idea where to go.. figured this put because the pix can not ping the exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about? One query, got three responses... I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q194131 D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server. There is a knowldedge base article on this. Use www.google.com to search for it. I would not use M$ search site. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns points to the single ip address I was using. What I will need to do is change the mx record to point to my extra ip and static map it. Also the fixups in my config on the pix does include port 25 and 80 but when I do a no fixup on them and write t they return. Weird. Guys you have been a big help I owe you all one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not need though... D The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first. (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto
RE: Help please
No shit im sorry guys this has gotten way out of hand. I think I have a hundred directions to go off in. now I need to put in on paper and decide what the best way to go is. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please VBG I've given up. I feel like charging him now. What he really needs is a consultant. ;o) D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Your making this harder then it needs to be. The PIX is your Firewall...not the proxy. Proxy is basically being used to Authenticate Internet Access to internal users. Your Proxy, Exchange Server, and OWA server, etc should be pointing directly to your PIX Firewall. The PIX Firewall should be connected to the LAN and Internet... You have options for DMZ zone but that is irrelevant. Access to your internal systems using the port redirection remains the same whether your using dmz zone or not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please That's a problem. Read previous mail. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think we are missing something. There is no possible way to not go through proxy. Hes is the only box that sees pix. Direct cable from pix internal to proxy external Proxy --Pix --router/internet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah. I specifically stated not to map to your proxy first. Send straight to the 192.168.x.x of the OWA Box. ALso, you need to modify a few things on this box. This box should have one nic. I'm assuming the pix is connected to your lan. The OWA box needs to point to the pix as it's default gateway. Assign the DNS from your ISP to the OWA Box. Use static routes for local routing issues. If you perform these steps as I'm telling you then it will work. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Well the solution I created is nto going to work. You can map inside out through the proxy to another net. It has no idea where to go.. figured this put because the pix can not ping the exchange server. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about? One query, got three responses... I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q194131 D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server. There is a knowldedge base article on this. Use www.google.com to search for it. I would not use M$ search site. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns points to the single ip address I was using. What I will need to do is change the mx record to point to my extra ip and static map it. Also the fixups in my config on the pix does include port 25 and 80 but when I do a no fixup on them and write t they return. Weird. Guys you have been a big help I owe you all one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not need though... D The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first. (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Oh yea -Original Message- From: Ronald
Help please
I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
Yes I forgot to say if they do that internally it works Also I have open tcp and udp any any on the firewall to se if it was a port issue and it had the same result. Thanks so much guys. I'm almost ready to cal M$ but then, no one learns anything. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please If they do http://server/exchange internally it works though? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
Authenticated users have log on locally. Domain users do not. -Original Message- From: Alex Tillett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please check to see if they have logon locally rights -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please If they do http://server/exchange internally it works though? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
I think I said that I tried opening tcp and udp any any on the pix and it had no effect. I would believe this would eliminate the pix. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in there. D It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something. -Ornette Coleman -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly frustrating. It SHOULD work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please 1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if that's how you're doing it) points. 2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed Q276388 to the letter. Whether OWA 5.5 works through proxy has nothing to do with whether OWA 2000 does; they are nowhere NEAR being the same product. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help please Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: no go-a !!
Are you looking under you exchange iis or your web server iis. You should be looking on your exchange server. You can redirect a url from your web server to exchange. Unless they are the same box then ignore me. :) -Original Message- From: Em [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA: no go-a !! I upgraded from NT 4/Exch 5.5 a week ago to Win2K server/Exchange 2000 and I have no OWA - The HTTP virtual server appears correct in ESM, but there is only Administration Web Site under IIS - no Default Web Site - I've been able to determine that I should have a Default Web Site and that it should contain exchange, public, exchadmin and exchweb, but I don't know if I can just go build my own website and create what I need myself... I have reinstalled Exchange entirely and also reapplied SP2, but to no avail - Anyone have any information on this type of scenario ??- Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 M: drive
I thought the M: drive on exchange 2000 clients was not supposed to be backed up directly. I believe I saw a technet article on this. It's funny because my learnkey cd's for exch2k show them backing up the m: drive directly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 M: drive
Yeah well I wasn't really relying on the cd's for training anyway just a way to kill time here. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 M: drive So it's apparently time to ask learnkey for a refund or a proofreader's discount. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 M: drive I thought the M: drive on exchange 2000 clients was not supposed to be backed up directly. I believe I saw a technet article on this. It's funny because my learnkey cd's for exch2k show them backing up the m: drive directly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 M: drive
True im pretty good at pissing people off -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 M: drive Yeah well, no better way to kill time than harassing vendors is there? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 M: drive Yeah well I wasn't really relying on the cd's for training anyway just a way to kill time here. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 M: drive So it's apparently time to ask learnkey for a refund or a proofreader's discount. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 M: drive I thought the M: drive on exchange 2000 clients was not supposed to be backed up directly. I believe I saw a technet article on this. It's funny because my learnkey cd's for exch2k show them backing up the m: drive directly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pop3 settings
I am trying to test internal pop3 settings for a fax machine. I pass all the tests in outlook except logging on to the server. I have pop3 enabled but I keep getting user password or email address errors. I have tried every possible username here. Are there other settings that need to be changed. Any help would be appreciated. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Exchange can handle a lot more than that. My two lousy Exchange gateways pass about 100,000 emails everyday. If you get the box you're talking about, it would be more than enough. What everybody's trying to say is even though Exchange can handle the load, you're better off obtaining software that's specifically designed for the task at hand. S. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server PuhLease... The MTA and IMC can easily handle that on even a lesser machine. I'd have a GB of RAM though... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brent Miller Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server We were thinking about bring up a new Exchange Org. There would be one server in the site and it would be a dual Giga Hertz processors - Half gig of ram. I still don't believe that exchange's imc and mta can handle 3 messages. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Perhaps. But Lyris can integrate right into a SQL DB and carry the load. Pumping 30K messages through your standard Exchange server would probably bring it to it's knees. I suppose if you had a large cluster you could probably pull it off. Brent, what is the config of your Exch server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Martin I have seen GroupWise clusters handle that load easily. I would think that Exchange Enterprise would be able to as well properly configured. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: October 1, 2001 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Dude, for 30K emails, your company is gonna need to spend some money PERIOD. Exchange isn't gonna do it and it shouldn't be expected too. Tell management to get out their checkbook and call Lyris. www.lyris.com It integrates very well with a SQL back end. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brent Miller Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server How can I configure Exchange to be a mass email server. My company wants to send out the same email to 3 recipients external to the company. These recipients will come from web based front end and a SQL back end. What is the maximum recipients a Distribution list can have? Does any have any idea how to implement a solution for this scenario? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Pop3 settings
Yeah I got that. It does not accept that either. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop3 settings Archives correct format for username for POP3 is domain\nt_id\mailbox_alias. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pop3 settings I am trying to test internal pop3 settings for a fax machine. I pass all the tests in outlook except logging on to the server. I have pop3 enabled but I keep getting user password or email address errors. I have tried every possible username here. Are there other settings that need to be changed. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pop3 settings
No event log message on client. Event log on server has event 13003: Logon attempt from 192.168.5.44 to sssnt/rmazzotta has failed: HrLookupCredentials() call failed with error A required privilege is not held by the client.. This is coming from my workstation. Office XP. Happens on any machine. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop3 settings Is it unique and unambiguous? What is the error message you receive? Are you trying it on the server where the user's mailbox resides? Errors in the event log? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop3 settings Yeah I got that. It does not accept that either. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop3 settings Archives correct format for username for POP3 is domain\nt_id\mailbox_alias. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pop3 settings I am trying to test internal pop3 settings for a fax machine. I pass all the tests in outlook except logging on to the server. I have pop3 enabled but I keep getting user password or email address errors. I have tried every possible username here. Are there other settings that need to be changed. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird Problem w/OWA
I -Original Message- Maybe someone else has experienced this. I have 1 user that can not log into OWA. His box has the right username associated to it. And all the spelling is right. When he logs into OWA to his mailbox it says can not connect to server. I can log in as me to his box so it CAN find the server. I did change his username in AD but there are other who have had username changes and they work. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird Problem w/OWA
Not sure this message made it. Maybe someone else has experienced this. I have 1 user that can not log into OWA. His box has the right username associated to it. And all the spelling is right. When he logs into OWA to his mailbox it says can not connect to server. I can log in as me to his box so it CAN find the server. I did change his username in AD but there are other who have had username changes and they work. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird Problem w/OWA
That does nothing. Same result. This is so annoying. Thanks though -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA Have him use his SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the username box, instead of his username (jsmith). -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird Problem w/OWA Not sure this message made it. Maybe someone else has experienced this. I have 1 user that can not log into OWA. His box has the right username associated to it. And all the spelling is right. When he logs into OWA to his mailbox it says can not connect to server. I can log in as me to his box so it CAN find the server. I did change his username in AD but there are other who have had username changes and they work. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird Problem w/OWA
Yes as are all other users. -Original Message- From: Herrick, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA Is his alias the same as his username? Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA That does nothing. Same result. This is so annoying. Thanks though -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA Have him use his SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the username box, instead of his username (jsmith). -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird Problem w/OWA Not sure this message made it. Maybe someone else has experienced this. I have 1 user that can not log into OWA. His box has the right username associated to it. And all the spelling is right. When he logs into OWA to his mailbox it says can not connect to server. I can log in as me to his box so it CAN find the server. I did change his username in AD but there are other who have had username changes and they work. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Easybake Oven
This is getting old -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Like I said, it was the tip of the iceberg. I also left out Rotate your tires because I didn't think he was ready for that secret. Is ice a drink? I say no. Once melted, you can drink it. If it sublimates, you go thirsty. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Easybake Oven You forgot don't chew ice; it's bad for your teeth. Or is ice considered a drink? After all, it's made from water... - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven They usually recommend you brush after every meal, get plenty of rest, and chew 20 times before swallowing food. But you don't have to chew your drinks. They have said lots of things, that's just the tip of the iceberg. Please contact my associate Andy David (I believe you already have his email address) for further assistance in these matters. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven what did they recommend exactly? -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Because if they had put the actual requirements for win2k on the win2k boxes nobody would have bought it! In the past I've just double the box recommendations, for win2k it seems best to quad them! Tom Gray, CCNA, CBE Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is essentially the same as 2K with a new gui? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements for anything named XP. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware. Seen the minimum requirements for anything named 2000? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bauer, Mr. Rick Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Must be a COMPAQ server guy--always solve problems with bigger hardware. Rick Bauer The Hill School _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: MS Easybake Oven
Yeah I meant cold. Look at the monkey, Look at the silly monkey. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Useless facts no. 104: Actually tyre (habitual spelling, sorry) rotation was first discovered in Milton Keynes, UK. Due to the ridiculous number of roundabouts, tyres wear out on one side faster than on the other. Is it true? Dunno, but sounds feasible. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 September 2001 15:07 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: MS Easybake Oven Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven confused Don't tires rotate with the wheels? /confused -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Like I said, it was the tip of the iceberg. I also left out Rotate your tires because I didn't think he was ready for that secret. Is ice a drink? I say no. Once melted, you can drink it. If it sublimates, you go thirsty. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Easybake Oven You forgot don't chew ice; it's bad for your teeth. Or is ice considered a drink? After all, it's made from water... - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven They usually recommend you brush after every meal, get plenty of rest, and chew 20 times before swallowing food. But you don't have to chew your drinks. They have said lots of things, that's just the tip of the iceberg. Please contact my associate Andy David (I believe you already have his email address) for further assistance in these matters. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven what did they recommend exactly? -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Because if they had put the actual requirements for win2k on the win2k boxes nobody would have bought it! In the past I've just double the box recommendations, for win2k it seems best to quad them! Tom Gray, CCNA, CBE Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is essentially the same as 2K with a new gui? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements for anything named XP. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware. Seen the minimum requirements for anything named 2000? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bauer, Mr. Rick Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Must be a COMPAQ server guy--always solve problems with bigger hardware. Rick Bauer The Hill School _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: MS Easybake Oven
Ok piss off then. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I *AM* old, buddy. I'm a Great Old One with all the trimmin's. Sort by subject and delete everything in the MS Easybake Oven thread. It's not likely anything here is on topic. Now leave me be. I haven't seen Les in a long time and it's fun to thrash him a little. We like making a spectacle of ourselves. So there. Go punish yourself. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven This is getting old -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Like I said, it was the tip of the iceberg. I also left out Rotate your tires because I didn't think he was ready for that secret. Is ice a drink? I say no. Once melted, you can drink it. If it sublimates, you go thirsty. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Easybake Oven You forgot don't chew ice; it's bad for your teeth. Or is ice considered a drink? After all, it's made from water... - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven They usually recommend you brush after every meal, get plenty of rest, and chew 20 times before swallowing food. But you don't have to chew your drinks. They have said lots of things, that's just the tip of the iceberg. Please contact my associate Andy David (I believe you already have his email address) for further assistance in these matters. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven what did they recommend exactly? -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Because if they had put the actual requirements for win2k on the win2k boxes nobody would have bought it! In the past I've just double the box recommendations, for win2k it seems best to quad them! Tom Gray, CCNA, CBE Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is essentially the same as 2K with a new gui? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements for anything named XP. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware. Seen the minimum requirements for anything named 2000? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bauer, Mr. Rick Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Must be a COMPAQ server guy--always solve problems with bigger hardware. Rick Bauer The Hill School _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Nimda
Ooo thanks -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda Try here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nimda.shtml Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 September 2001 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda Searched cisco for nimba returned 0 results. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda You asked and answered your own question. It contains its own smtp host. It uses the local machine's address book and default DNS server. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:17 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Nimda Subject: RE: Nimda While we are on the subject, does anyone know how nimda finds an SMTP host for it's attempts to propagate itself SMTP? I've read all the reports I can find, all mention it's internal SMTP engine, but none tell how he finds an SMTP host to connect to. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Easybake Oven
Hehe true true -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Consider it done. Now would be an appropriate time for someone to say, Be careful what you wish for... you just might get it! (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Ok piss off then. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I *AM* old, buddy. I'm a Great Old One with all the trimmin's. Sort by subject and delete everything in the MS Easybake Oven thread. It's not likely anything here is on topic. Now leave me be. I haven't seen Les in a long time and it's fun to thrash him a little. We like making a spectacle of ourselves. So there. Go punish yourself. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven This is getting old -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Like I said, it was the tip of the iceberg. I also left out Rotate your tires because I didn't think he was ready for that secret. Is ice a drink? I say no. Once melted, you can drink it. If it sublimates, you go thirsty. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Easybake Oven You forgot don't chew ice; it's bad for your teeth. Or is ice considered a drink? After all, it's made from water... - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven They usually recommend you brush after every meal, get plenty of rest, and chew 20 times before swallowing food. But you don't have to chew your drinks. They have said lots of things, that's just the tip of the iceberg. Please contact my associate Andy David (I believe you already have his email address) for further assistance in these matters. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven what did they recommend exactly? -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Because if they had put the actual requirements for win2k on the win2k boxes nobody would have bought it! In the past I've just double the box recommendations, for win2k it seems best to quad them! Tom Gray, CCNA, CBE Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is essentially the same as 2K with a new gui? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements for anything named XP. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware. Seen the minimum requirements for anything named 2000? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bauer
RE: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3:
5. All your base. HEHE -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: And Lincoln has 2 l's that, if you put side by side, almost looks like... ...11 gasp ...Joel -- Rate this email: 1. It was useful 2. Not necessary but informative 3. Snort cheese bloody moron 4. Thanks, now I'm sending you a virus 5. All your base AAAH -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: And Kennedy and Lincoln both have seven letters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Hankins Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: I'm sure many of you have seen this already, but I thought it was a little interesting. Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: In the year of the new century and nine months, From the sky will come a great King of Terror... The sky will burn at forty-five degrees. Fire approaches the great new city... In the city of York there will be a great collapse, 2 twin brothers torn apart by chaos while the fortress falls the great leader will succumb third big war will begin when the big city is burning - NOSTRADAMUS He said this will be bigger than the previous two. 2001 is the first year of the new century and this is the 9th month. New York is located at the 41st degree Latitude. Bill Hankins Senior Network Engineer iCorps Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
For all the brains to show off maybe hehe -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDP.exe
Does anyone know where the utility ldp.exe is located. MS refers to it but does not give a location of the file. Figures. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
