Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
Thanks for the reply Aaron. Do you happen to know what percentage of spam Postini is catching at your company? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the experience has been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet used technical support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very good job of detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't believe they offer an outbound solution. Aaron -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
Thanks for the reply, Raj. Are you letting your users control their own spam settings (I believe that Postini offers this), or do you control it company-wide? Thanks again, Steve -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. We have used Postini for a couple of months now. Looks good so far, we are only using it for spam control on inbound mail. I would highly recommend it, Tech support is good as well. Raj -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the experience has been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet used technical support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very good job of detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't believe they offer an outbound solution. Aaron -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
Tom, Messagelabs was right around $4500/yr for the services we've contracted for - antivirus, antispam and antiporn. The first two work well. The last one is worthless, IMHO. The users are happy with the spam levels we're seeing. Messagelabs also offers an outbound scanning service (comes with every account) and has not been reliable at all. We're getting sporadic 553 errors as well as bounces because one or more of their servers have found their way into SPEWS.ORG's lists. At this point, the appeal of SpamAssasin isn't lost on me. When we went with messagelabs, the goal was less administration which has turned out to be a myth with Messagelabs. I've used the Postfix in the past and will take a look at SpamAssasin again. Thanks for the reply! Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. I dunno how much you're paying for MessageLabs' service, but it's pretty much a customized front end for the open-source SpamAssassin. The only benefit I can see over a stock Postfix/Sendmail gateway using Spamassassin, perhaps with MailScanner or amavisd or Anomy Sanitizer for some more advanced content routing, is that it gives more granular per-user settings. That's a lot of money on a bet that they can do better than 99.5% with 0 false positives than I do with a server I had laying around gathering dust, and routing sensitive information through a third party. Not familiar with how much better Postini does than 99.5% catch with 0 FPs. My users are simply thrilled. But I haven't told them they *could* have individualized Bayesian databases rather than a monolithic domain-wide one. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
We have Messagelabs - NAV for Gateways - NAV for Exchange - NAV Corporate on the desktops. Seems to work well as we've never had a virus reach one of the desktops. Steve -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002
Chris, Thanks for the response. I checked, and no, the user doesn't have mail delivered to a PST. The only PST in use is ARCHIVE.PST. Mail goes straight to the users' mailbox on exchange. Steve -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002 Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file? On 07/25/03 14:39, Steve Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her User A) calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the scenario: 1) User A sends invitation to User B for a meeting. 2) User B accepts invitation. 3) A short while later (the time varies), User A will receive a meeting cancellation of that meeting. 4) A check of User B's Sent Items folder shows a cancellation even though they never issued the cancellation. This has happened to User A at least a half-dozen times, and is not with any specific recipient. Also, they have been able to send many other successful meeting requests. This is on Exchange 2000 SP3 with Outlook 2002 on an all Windows 2000 network. Also, this is not happening to other users. Here's some of what I've tried so far: 1) I've checked the recipients' workstations for any auto-cancel rules and found none. 2) I've scanned the workstation for viruses and found none. 3) Searched MS's knowledgebase and read anything I could find on canceled meetings. 4) Tried starting Outlook with the /celanfreebusy and /cleanreminders switches. Any ideas? Thanks in advance for any suggestions! Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =lang=e nglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002
Hello, We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her User A) calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the scenario: 1) User A sends invitation to User B for a meeting. 2) User B accepts invitation. 3) A short while later (the time varies), User A will receive a meeting cancellation of that meeting. 4) A check of User B's Sent Items folder shows a cancellation even though they never issued the cancellation. This has happened to User A at least a half-dozen times, and is not with any specific recipient. Also, they have been able to send many other successful meeting requests. This is on Exchange 2000 SP3 with Outlook 2002 on an all Windows 2000 network. Also, this is not happening to other users. Here's some of what I've tried so far: 1) I've checked the recipients' workstations for any auto-cancel rules and found none. 2) I've scanned the workstation for viruses and found none. 3) Searched MS's knowledgebase and read anything I could find on canceled meetings. 4) Tried starting Outlook with the /celanfreebusy and /cleanreminders switches. Any ideas? Thanks in advance for any suggestions! Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Pine as a client to E2k
Maybe IMAP? Steve -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am in the position of trying to figure out how to get Pine to work as a mail client for E2k. Has anyone done this before and if so could you provide some pointers (perhaps a link)? I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value
Can anyone tell me if it's possible to search an Exchange 2000 database for a particular text string(s)? I need to extract all messages meeting a certain criteria. We use Promodag for reporting basic email usage, but this will not search the message body. TIA, Steve This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value
I actually did try exmerge to see what its capabilities are, and as you said it will only scan by subject. I'll try Ontrack's website. Thanks to everyone for all the replies! Steve -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value Exmerge will not help nor this Q article. He wants to search the message body. The others mentioned only scan subject text and attachment name. I haven't tried it yet but you might want to look at Ontracks new tools. Although it may only do as Exmerge and IISscan do. This might help: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q224493 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sorenson Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value Can anyone tell me if it's possible to search an Exchange 2000 database for a particular text string(s)? I need to extract all messages meeting a certain criteria. We use Promodag for reporting basic email usage, but this will not search the message body. TIA, Steve _ __ _ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com _ ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ __ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com __ __ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global vs. individual Recipient Limits
Thanks Chris. That is indeed the case. Everything else I read seemed to imply that the defaults were just that, and that the user settings overrided the defaults. Thanks, Steve -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global vs. individual Recipient Limits Looking at Q262145 it says you can use one of the following methods and then describes the two methods you've mentioned. Based on the information you are seeing, it would appear that when they say you can use one of the following methods they mean one and only one. May have to do with how the categorizer does it's thing... dunno. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Global vs. individual Recipient Limits Hello all, Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2002. Trying to allow one individual to create a DL of 1000 users and send email to these individuals (no, it's really not spam, nor opt-out). In System Manager | Global Settings | Message Delivery | Defaults | Recipient Limits is set to Maximum = 125. In ADUC for this user, I've set their Delivery Options | Recipient Limits to 1000. However, when this user attempts to create a DL with more than the default of 125 users, they receive a warning stating that they have exceeded the system limit of 125 users. The DL is then truncated to only 125 users. Is their another setting I'm missing somewhere? Searching Google and MS's Knowledge base, it would seem that the user's limit should override the global default. TIA for any help! Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global vs. individual Recipient Limits
Hello all, Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2002. Trying to allow one individual to create a DL of 1000 users and send email to these individuals (no, it's really not spam, nor opt-out). In System Manager | Global Settings | Message Delivery | Defaults | Recipient Limits is set to Maximum = 125. In ADUC for this user, I've set their Delivery Options | Recipient Limits to 1000. However, when this user attempts to create a DL with more than the default of 125 users, they receive a warning stating that they have exceeded the system limit of 125 users. The DL is then truncated to only 125 users. Is their another setting I'm missing somewhere? Searching Google and MS's Knowledge base, it would seem that the user's limit should override the global default. TIA for any help! Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
You get what you pay for. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE Definitely some very inexpensive recreational pharmaceuticals. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE Are you on crack? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE To all the girls I've loved before Who traveled in and out my door I'm glad they came along I dedicate this song To all the girls I've loved before _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR
Well, you could create a distribution list with no members. Then add the SMTP email addresses of those layed off individuals to the list. HTH, Steve -Original Message- From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR Hope this isn't too duh! Is there a way to automatically purge undeliverable emails from an Exchange 5.5 server? We have no need for them and with major layoffs in our company .. We get a lot of them! Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
All this haiku stuff It is hard to make sense with Five seven seven -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to public mailing list? -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Silly me. Failed that test miserably, I did. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test So the public can ridicule him Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to public mailing list? -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gateway Virus Protection.
NAV Corporate has Anti Virus for Gateways that we're using here with great success. Steve -Original Message- From: John Shi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gateway Virus Protection. Hi Everyone, Has anyone know a good product that would block the virus and Active X, Java Applet on the gateway? Any life experience is appreciated. I heard about TrendMicro only. Thanks John Shi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
Half the fun is nailing the live ones to the catapult. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor I prefer frozen squirrels for catapult ammo. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Here we use broken monitors for catapult ammo. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I agree with Tom. We've been using NAV corporate (NAV for Gateways, NAV Exchange and NAV on the desktops) for a year and have no, none, nada, zippo outbreaks. It's performed flawlessy through bombardment of the many viruses of 2001. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a blue screen, etc. So far, you make a good case for moving off of your preferred solution. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
