RE: Outlook 2003 - Bookmark Not Valid

[Ward, Stuart]

I have the same problem using 2003 Server, 2003 Exchange but with no 5.5's
in the mix.  Does not appear to have anything to do with Outlook  version -
tried 2000 and 2003.  I'm using XP as my client machine.

I have the above plus a DC in a test environment and posted the info a while
back.  Unfortunately there were no responses, so  have been trying to
troubleshoot for a while now on-and-off.

Stu

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003 - Bookmark Not Valid


I was wondering if anyone had seen this before:

This is a new 2003 Server with Exchange 2003 - setup with the ADC to an
Exchange 5.5 SP4 - NT 4.0 SP6a server for migration.

When you migrate an account or create one onto the new server (E2003)
outlook complains that the "bookmark is not valid" when you try and create
the profile in outlook. Also, when you migrate someone you may not see
that error unless you try and access the GAL. Is this an AD problem? I am
not sure where to begin troubleshooting it.

Any help is appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: site connector question.

[Ward, Stuart]

ah the wonders of technology... apologies for the resend - was rejected the
first time:


remove the Directory Replication Connector, then the site connector

-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: site connector question.


Happy New Year All.

Just a quick question for the new year.  I am running exchange 5.5 on an NT
Server , i know i am upgrading soon 8-)

Ok, I have 2 offices A and B, A being head office. Both are connected via
site connector. Now Office B has been shut down and the server is now
offline. I have one member of staff from office B moving to Office A, but my
problem is, exchange in office A can still see all the accounts that was in
office B.  I am unable to modify or delete these accounts becuase exchange
that was in office b is down.

Is there any way i can delete the acconts that were in office B from being
shown and used on the exchange server at head office.

thanks for your time

vas

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk

[Ward, Stuart]

Keep the old drives in the system if you can and put the logs on them
through the same process.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk


Do you have 2 spare slots to put those drives in? If so do that. Then use
the performance optimizer to move the stores. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk

Hi guys,
 
   Will be gratefull if you can contribute to this please. 
 
I have an Exchange 5.5, sp4 server on win 2k with sp4.
 
In my Dell Power Edge 2400, i have two scsi disks
(0&1) within this exchange server. Disk 1 has 3 18g hds with a logical drive
of G.
 
G contains Exchsrvr folder which hosts priv.edb and pub.edb.  its like
g:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ and the two edb files.
 
Now, G is near capacity and would like to upgrade it to bigger space.
 
I have purchased two 36gb hd from Dell (based on Dell's advise), and ready
to be backing up the G drive and the rest.
 
I would like you to feel free to suggest any tips and tricks that u know
off, or any advise.
 
Thanking you



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2003 test scenario

[Ward, Stuart]

E2k3 W2k3 DC AD XPClient Outlook2003

Hi all

Trying to test all this out, and running into problem when trying to set up
mail under outlook.  When trying to resolve mailbox, receive error:

Unable to resolve name; Bookmark is invalid

Any ideas?

Thanks

Stu



Steps

setup W2k3 DC and DNS on same machine
setup W2k3  and exchange 2K3 member server
run dcdiag
run forestprep
run domainprep
setup XP box as client
setup test user
on exchange box, set up mailbox (does not show in store - until mail sent or
logon as I understand)
tried to create account on Outlook2003
when trying to resolve name receive error above.






Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: lost in relay problem

[Ward, Stuart]

Do you accept email for "12.10.133.30"?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: lost in relay problem



exch 5.5 w/sp4

First let me say i am sorry, cause i keep comming back and asking this.  I
MUST be missing something or just plai stupid, time to quit and go flip
burgers.  We have a mail server that is 5.5 smtp bridgehead ( 12.10.133.30 )
and in routing restrictions have hosts and clients checked.  

Using the following test http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ when i
send it to myself [EMAIL PROTECTED] it WORKS and the email gets to me with
the following...


<<< 220 postoffice02.aruplab.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready 
 HELO staff.iinet.net.au 
<<< 250 OK 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
 RCPT TO: 
<<< 250 OK - Recipient 
 DATA 
<<< 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 
 MESSAGE
<<< 250 OK 
SUCCESS

Relay Accepted - final response code 250


Now if i change the TO address to a generic [EMAIL PROTECTED] address that I
have setup, some other smtp recipent then my own it fails 5 times then
suddenly works on the 6th, however the mail doesnt ever deliver.  per the
follwing...

+5 of these

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<< 250 OK - Reset 
 MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
 RCPT TO: 
<<< 550 Relaying is prohibited

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<< 250 OK - Reset 
 MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
 RCPT TO: 
<<< 250 OK - Recipient 
 DATA 
<<< 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 
 MESSAGE
<<< 250 OK 
SUCCESS



In senario 2 I dont see how it can do a RCPT TO: and 550 - to - RCPT TO: 250
OK - Recipent.  SO I AM CONFUSED ALL TO HELL.  Is it like "try this five
times and on six it will work?  And even if in senario 2 sending it to
another server it never delivers doesnt it still sit on my server and eat up
cpu/memory/disk?  

In senario 1 if the message is "relayed" to my server and to my clients it
works right off the bat??!!  i dont see how that is denying relaying?
Doesnt that just open a huge window for asia-pacifica to spam my clients?
Is there a way to plug this?

sorry but i've made this so complex in my head it hurts.

much thanks
e-  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

[Ward, Stuart]

Recently done exactly that with same previous exposure to Linux as you Matt.
Works well, but still tweaking...

All config information gathered from web - Linux downloaded from RedHat.

Stu



-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget


We've been using Spamassassin for several months now. For being free it
really does help out. We haven't updated to the latest version and I'm sure
that has limited its effectiveness. It really isn't hard to configure and
there is some excellent documentation available on the web.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget

Hello list,
I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm
having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not
going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about
100 users.  The products that I have found that are reasonably priced
are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with
SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's
out of the question.  Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few
more to compare.  My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00.
What cheep products are you using.  Good/Bad experiences.  Any help with
my product search would be great.  

Thanks

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation

[Ward, Stuart]

Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary
folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct?

Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the same
result?

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation


Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if
you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website.
This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is
retrospective.

Regards,

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation


Ex5.5

I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from
inbox that there is no way to recover said item.  The item does not appear
as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'.  I have no
backups whilst the item existed.

Thanks

Stu



Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation

[Ward, Stuart]

Ex5.5

I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from
inbox that there is no way to recover said item.  The item does not appear
as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'.  I have no
backups whilst the item existed.

Thanks

Stu



Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: GAL Question

[Ward, Stuart]

Exchange - 'advanced' tab - 'hide from address book'

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GAL Question


I want to create permissions on a calendar.  I want to create a group
instead of granting rights to individual users.  Where should the groups be
created?  Should I setup NT groups or Exchange groups?  And if I set up
Exchange groups, how can I hide them from the GAL but still use them for
permissions?

Hope this makes sense.  

Samantha 

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: GAL Question


absolutely

- Original Message - 
From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: GAL Question


> Hello All.
>
> If you hide a mailbox from the Address book in the Exchange Administrator,
> can messages still be sent to it if you know the address?
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: attachement overload

[Ward, Stuart]

Doesn't work like that...SIS

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: attachement overload


Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our
company where people need to mail files to each other
on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of
500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better.
We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do
not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file
to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the
exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items).
This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. 

IS there any way to manage this better? We tried
public folders but this just moves the files from one
database to another in Exchange 5.5.

TIA

__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I've been searching Usenet and MSTechnet with no reference to this problem

[Ward, Stuart]

screen resolution...

-Original Message-
From: REED, JOHN D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I've been searching Usenet and MSTechnet with no reference to
this problem


I'm new to the list, so I apologize if this problem has been a topic of
discussion before. I've searched everywhere and haven't found anything.



Ok, here's the deal!
Problem: certain users cannot see any more than 15 or so "all Day" items
in
a specific Public Calendar.

I have a Public Calendar (calendar folder in the public folders)

Several users who cannot see more than 15 "all day" items on any given
day
in this calendar.

Exchange2k
Outlook2000 & 2002
windows2k
current service packs


They can, however, see all items if they use OWA

I can, from my laptop using Outlook2002 create a profile for the user
with
the problem, log on with them using their userID and their Password, and
see
all of the items.


What I have done so far on the troubled users computer:

upgraded client from outlook2000 - 2002
ran outlook /cleanfreebusy /cleanreminders /cleanviews
removed and recreated the profile
tried using different views to view the calendar
changed the screen resolution


What I have done on the back end:
Moved users mailbox from one Exchange server to another
removed any replicas that existed with other servers



I am completely out of ideas

Please help

John Reed


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: W2KSP4 v. Exchange

[Ward, Stuart]

reapply exchange sp?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2KSP4 v. Exchange


I put SP4 on my W2K/E2K Exchange box last night, and it seems to have
broken some functionality, remote users who connect via VPN are unable
to connect, and some users cannot view HTML messages.  Anyone come
across similar behavior?

David


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DL for internal use only

[Ward, Stuart]

We're doing this soon - why so?

Thanks

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL for internal use only


Yes, but it makes upgrading to E2K a bit more problematic.

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: DL for internal use only
Subject: RE: DL for internal use only


Can't you just remove the SMTP address?

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL for internal use only


Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: DL for internal use only
Subject: DL for internal use only


Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for
people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world?
My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside
source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the
people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the
outside. Thanks,

b

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and
any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are
not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments
immediately.  You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any
attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents
to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DL for internal use only

[Ward, Stuart]

Can't you just remove the SMTP address?

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL for internal use only


Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: DL for internal use only
Subject: DL for internal use only


Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for
people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world?
My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside
source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the
people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the
outside. Thanks,

b

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1

[Ward, Stuart]

Fat fingers I think...

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart 
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1


OK everyone here it is...the fix.

As you veteran networkers probably detected right of the bat is...it is a
DNS problem.

Seems the ISP has not delgated our DNS to the gaining ISP.

So, when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] my local sever thought
the mail was a relay, hence the " cannot relay through this machine"
message.

To fix the problem, I have to add an email address to my user on the
exchange 2k server that looked like this [EMAIL PROTECTED] (however, I
think I can replace that with the dns name and be just fine).  This allowed
the mail to come straight into my server from public.

Does this concern anyone?

We will have to wait until I get all of the users "forwarded" to their new
@ipaddress before we can delegate to the ISP and then I can forward all of
their mail back to them from the old account.  Unless someone knows of a way
to make unix send mail pit this all out automatcally.

Thanks for all of the replies to help sovle this.  Especially to Ben for the
"think it again" posting.

Christian

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:23 pm
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1

> First I'll set the stage:
> 
> We are currntly using an ISP for our mail we use either IMAP or 
> POP# toget it from them and bring it home to the client.  However, 
> this is getting costly.  So, the exchange server.  Currently the 
> isp still has the dns, but will be delegating it shortly.
> 
> Here are the specs of my situation
> 
> Domain name is: hillsboro.k12.wi.us
> DNS name is mail2.hillsboro.k12.wi.us (this is pointing to my server)
> 
> Server setup:
> E2K SP3 on W2K SP3
> 
> Global settings in xch mngr:
> Internet Message format:
> Default - SMTP domain=*
> all else is default
> 
> Recipeint policies:
> default policy - Email addresses (Policy) = SMTP (checked) = 
> @hillsboro.k12.wi.us   
>X400 (Checked) = appropriate paths
> 
> Default SMTP Virtual Server:
> General tab= IP Address: (all unassigned)
> Access tab:
> Authentication= all boxes (except "require TLS encryption) are checked
> Certificates = None used
> Connection control = "all except the list below" checked
> Relaying = "Only the list below" and "allow all computers which 
> successfully authenticate regardless of the list above." checked
> 
> The rest of the SMTP virtual server tabs are in default.
> 
> 
> 
> Connector:
> General = lists my exchange server as the virtual server
> Address space = type:SMTP  Address:*  Cost:1
> Connector scope = entire organization 
> 
> Deivery restriction = none
> 
> IF you guys can help, I will be VERY grateful.
> 
> Thanks
> Christian
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Ben Winzenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:46 am
> Subject: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> 
> > "All looks good according to the MS documentation" still doesn't 
> > say HOW
> > your server is set up.
> > Please detail how you are set up, including authentication 
> > methods, what
> > the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc.  Also, what is your
> > domain name that is having problems?
> > -
> > 
> > Ben Winzenz
> > Network Engineer
> > Gardner & White
> > (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> > 
> > Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM
> > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> > Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> > Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, my policy is correct.
> > 
> > I can seem to get my finger on this.
> > 
> > Christian
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am
> > Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> > 
> > > you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name?
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> >

RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1

[Ward, Stuart]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1


OK everyone here it is...the fix.

As you veteran networkers probably detected right of the bat is...it is a
DNS problem.

Seems the ISP has not delgated our DNS to the gaining ISP.

So, when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] my local sever thought
the mail was a relay, hence the " cannot relay through this machine"
message.

To fix the problem, I have to add an email address to my user on the
exchange 2k server that looked like this [EMAIL PROTECTED] (however, I
think I can replace that with the dns name and be just fine).  This allowed
the mail to come straight into my server from public.

Does this concern anyone?

We will have to wait until I get all of the users "forwarded" to their new
@ipaddress before we can delegate to the ISP and then I can forward all of
their mail back to them from the old account.  Unless someone knows of a way
to make unix send mail pit this all out automatcally.

Thanks for all of the replies to help sovle this.  Especially to Ben for the
"think it again" posting.

Christian

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:23 pm
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1

> First I'll set the stage:
> 
> We are currntly using an ISP for our mail we use either IMAP or 
> POP# toget it from them and bring it home to the client.  However, 
> this is getting costly.  So, the exchange server.  Currently the 
> isp still has the dns, but will be delegating it shortly.
> 
> Here are the specs of my situation
> 
> Domain name is: hillsboro.k12.wi.us
> DNS name is mail2.hillsboro.k12.wi.us (this is pointing to my server)
> 
> Server setup:
> E2K SP3 on W2K SP3
> 
> Global settings in xch mngr:
> Internet Message format:
> Default - SMTP domain=*
> all else is default
> 
> Recipeint policies:
> default policy - Email addresses (Policy) = SMTP (checked) = 
> @hillsboro.k12.wi.us   
>X400 (Checked) = appropriate paths
> 
> Default SMTP Virtual Server:
> General tab= IP Address: (all unassigned)
> Access tab:
> Authentication= all boxes (except "require TLS encryption) are checked
> Certificates = None used
> Connection control = "all except the list below" checked
> Relaying = "Only the list below" and "allow all computers which 
> successfully authenticate regardless of the list above." checked
> 
> The rest of the SMTP virtual server tabs are in default.
> 
> 
> 
> Connector:
> General = lists my exchange server as the virtual server
> Address space = type:SMTP  Address:*  Cost:1
> Connector scope = entire organization 
> 
> Deivery restriction = none
> 
> IF you guys can help, I will be VERY grateful.
> 
> Thanks
> Christian
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Ben Winzenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:46 am
> Subject: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> 
> > "All looks good according to the MS documentation" still doesn't 
> > say HOW
> > your server is set up.
> > Please detail how you are set up, including authentication 
> > methods, what
> > the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc.  Also, what is your
> > domain name that is having problems?
> > -
> > 
> > Ben Winzenz
> > Network Engineer
> > Gardner & White
> > (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> > 
> > Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM
> > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> > Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> > Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, my policy is correct.
> > 
> > I can seem to get my finger on this.
> > 
> > Christian
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am
> > Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> > 
> > > you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name?
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
> > > 
> > > 
> > > All:
> > > 
> > > I am receiving the following error when sending into my system 
> from> > outside:
> > > 
> > > Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email 
> address)> > 
> > > Does anyone have a clue about this one?
> > > 
> > > I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP 
> > Connector 
> > > properties for correct access and relaying information.
> > > 
> > > All looks good according to newest MS documentation.
> > > 
> > > I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine.
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > CV
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   ht

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

[Ward, Stuart]

Have them 'zipped' up...

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks?


Sometimes users get sent legitimate executables, they get blocked because of
the extention, so I have to copy it to a share for them to retrieve it - I'm
then reliant on the AV on my desktop, what I'd prefer is for the virus
checker to say "is it infected" before it looks at whether it should
quarantine that sort of file.

Maybe I'm looking at it the wrong way, but that's just how I'd like it to
work - in fairness with 3.81 they're most of the way there with the
integrated quarantine manager section.

regards
paul
- Original Message - 
From: "Ward, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?


> Why would it need to?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
>
>
> No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan
> attachments blocked by extention blocking - we've had loads of bugbears
> quarantined for being .exe's , but it doesn't seem to actually scan them
as
> well.
>
> regards,
> Paul
> --
> Paul Hutchings
> Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
> Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 06 June 2003 15:46
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
> >
> >
> > You might want to consider upgrading to Scanmail 3.81. I believe it
> > functions a LOT better.
> >
> > --
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis Inc.
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:25 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: ScanMail missing tricks?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A user got an infected attachment right to her Inbox, which
> > > doesn't ever happen here since we started using ScanMail.  I
> > > have ScanMail 3.52 (Exch 5.5
> > > SP4) blocking all the attachments on the List of Danger, and
> > > yet this BUGBEAR.B file - QABACKUP.EXE.SCR - got through to
> > > the Inbox.  A Manual scan showed up six other virus-infected
> > > attachments which had apparently got through.  But the manual
> > > scan does not pick up the file I just mentioned, which is now
> > > in my Deleted Items.  A copy is on my hard drive and Sophos
> > > AntiVirus also doesn't detect it.
> > >
> > > Is it possible that ScanMail misses out on some messages if
> > > several arrive at once, or is there another more likely
> > > solution?  I have sent the file to Trend and Sophos to see
> > > what they say, but the attachment blocking was, I thought,
> > > non-negotiable and always works.  Luckily I badger my users
> > > about the danger of attachments on a fairly regular basis.
> > >
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > -- 
> > > Tim Gowen
> > > RAF Museum
> > > IT Dept.
> > >
> > >
> > > Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended
> > > for the above named only and may be confidential. If they
> > > have come to you in error you must take no action based on
> > > them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply
> > > to this e-mail and highlight the error.
> > >
> > > Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been
> > > created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100%
> > > secure communications medium. We advise that you understand
> > > and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.
> > >
> > > Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this
> > > e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
> > > that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient
> > > should take steps to confirm that they are actually virus free.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting F

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

[Ward, Stuart]

Why would it need to?

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?


No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan
attachments blocked by extention blocking - we've had loads of bugbears
quarantined for being .exe's , but it doesn't seem to actually scan them as
well.

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 June 2003 15:46
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
> 
> 
> You might want to consider upgrading to Scanmail 3.81. I believe it
> functions a LOT better.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:25 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: ScanMail missing tricks?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > A user got an infected attachment right to her Inbox, which 
> > doesn't ever happen here since we started using ScanMail.  I 
> > have ScanMail 3.52 (Exch 5.5
> > SP4) blocking all the attachments on the List of Danger, and 
> > yet this BUGBEAR.B file - QABACKUP.EXE.SCR - got through to 
> > the Inbox.  A Manual scan showed up six other virus-infected 
> > attachments which had apparently got through.  But the manual 
> > scan does not pick up the file I just mentioned, which is now 
> > in my Deleted Items.  A copy is on my hard drive and Sophos 
> > AntiVirus also doesn't detect it.
> > 
> > Is it possible that ScanMail misses out on some messages if 
> > several arrive at once, or is there another more likely 
> > solution?  I have sent the file to Trend and Sophos to see 
> > what they say, but the attachment blocking was, I thought, 
> > non-negotiable and always works.  Luckily I badger my users 
> > about the danger of attachments on a fairly regular basis.
> > 
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > -- 
> > Tim Gowen  
> > RAF Museum
> > IT Dept.
> >  
> > 
> > Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended 
> > for the above named only and may be confidential. If they 
> > have come to you in error you must take no action based on 
> > them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply 
> > to this e-mail and highlight the error.
> > 
> > Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been 
> > created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% 
> > secure communications medium. We advise that you understand 
> > and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.
> > 
> > Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this 
> > e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise 
> > that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient 
> > should take steps to confirm that they are actually virus free.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Bandwidth Help

[Ward, Stuart]

Nimda comes to mind...

-Original Message-
From: Jason E. Sommers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bandwidth Help


Group,
 
I am having some problem with my Exchange server using way too much
bandwidth. I have been using Exchange 5.5 sp4 with my Windows 2000
server, I just recently upgraded to Exchange server 2000. Now my other
computers on the network cannot download anything. They can still surf
the web but all download go so long and the stop. I have a 512
connection to the internet via cable. I have tried several routers with
the same problems. The cable company told me that my connection was fine
and they could not support me any further since I am using a router.
 
I have set the exchange server to only relay from the five computers on
my LAN and they user would have to be authenticated by there server
before they could relay to the SMTP VS. Any other thoughts would be
greatly appreciated.
 
Thanks,
 
Jason
 
P.S. Does anyone know what it means to get Outlook Express messages in
all of their shared folders on the networkthanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be legally privileged and confidential.  If you are not an
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently
delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately.  You should not retain,
copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all
or any part of the contents to any other person.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Win32.chiracdance.trojan

[Ward, Stuart]

Does anyone have any information on the following virus:

Win32.chiracdance.trojan

None of the Antivirus vendors appear to have anything other than CA which
only show detection for their product but no information.

I have searched Google and am continuing to look around

TIA for any help.

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:mark.harford@;bbc.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Delete Exchange Attributes" Option on ADU&C SNAP IN


Do all the workstations/servers you run this from have Exchange System
Manager installed?

-Original Message-
From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [mailto:Clint.Kleciak@;CIGNA.COM] 
Sent: 12 November 2002 18:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Delete Exchange Attributes" Option on ADU&C SNAP IN


Greetings:

I am having some inconsistencies in the option to "Delete Exchange
Attributes" showing up in ADU&C snap in, sometimes it does, sometimes it
doesn't.

I am running WIN2K SP2 and E2KSP2 and making sure that the "Advance
Features" is selected under view as described at
"http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;307350";.

Anyone have any suggestions or has run into the same issue.

Thanks


Clint


--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.
This e-mail transmission may contain confidential information.  This
information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity
to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly.  Please delete it
from your files if you are not the intended recipient.  Thank you for
your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically 
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do 
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the 
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will 
signify your consent to this.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mailing Lists

[Ward, Stuart]

Do what you're doing but create a hidden distribution list with no
recipients with alias as appropriate.  Add the 'Billings Update' SMTP
address to it.



-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:mustafa.ibrahim@;broadcastingdata.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailing Lists



Hi all

We send out lots of documents and emails to clients. Many of these are
constructed in the form of Distribution Lists. I am want to make sure that
none of the clients is aware of who else is receiving these emails at the
sametime as its sent to them. Many of these clients are competitors and
would rather others are not aware when they recieve there documents and so
on.

And so I have been sending the mail recently by just putting the DL alias
name into BCC and sending messages that way. This works fine. However, I was
just wodering if there is another way to do this. Another way that will
allow you to have a generic message group name displayed in the TO: field
when the clients receive their emails. Something like like "Billings Update"
for instance. Much like what you get when you receive a message from this
forum.

Right now when I BCC the DL list nothing is shown in the To field. Any
ideas?. Any feedback is much appreciated. 

Mustafa

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: netsvc to stop SA

[Ward, Stuart]

Tried to stop them by stopping System Attendant or by dependent services in
order, so:

Event
IMS
News
IS
MTA
Dir
SA

Doing it manually on the server with 'net' works both ways.  The logged in
account on the remote NT4 box is in Domain Admins and Domain Admins is in
local admin group of the Exchange server.

I get no error messages, it just doesn't stop them - The Event, IMS and News
do stop then nothing else.  Is there a timeout issue here waiting for the
dependent service to stop?

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 7:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: netsvc to stop SA


How is it failing? 
Any error messages? DO you have the necessary rights?


-Original Message-----
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: netsvc to stop SA


All

Ex5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6

Pointers to relevant FAQ's appreciated - can't seem to find any

What am I missing?  I am trying to use netsvc to stop Exchange services from
a remote NT4 server.  I can stop some but not all, whether I try to shutdown
the services in order or use just MSExchangeSA.

syntax is simple as far as I can see:

netsvc MSExchangeSA \\servername /stop

or

netsvc "Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service" \\servername /stop



Any help is appreciated.

TIA

Stu 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

netsvc to stop SA

[Ward, Stuart]

All

Ex5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6

Pointers to relevant FAQ's appreciated - can't seem to find any

What am I missing?  I am trying to use netsvc to stop Exchange services from
a remote NT4 server.  I can stop some but not all, whether I try to shutdown
the services in order or use just MSExchangeSA.

syntax is simple as far as I can see:

netsvc MSExchangeSA \\servername /stop

or

netsvc "Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service" \\servername /stop



Any help is appreciated.

TIA

Stu 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: A mistake was made...

[Ward, Stuart]

exmerge

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A mistake was made...


Outlook 98.  exchange 5.5 sp4

User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake.  The Recall
Message action feature did not work very well on this.
This was very sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before
too many people read it.  What can I do?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4

[Ward, Stuart]

It's the same question just clarified further...

To restate "I want to set up an internal user to only be able to send email
to a single internal distribution list."



-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4


first there was a "restricting outbound email from a user"
now there is "an internal user" to "send email to a single internal
distribution list"
Make up your mind and re-state the question please.

Jerzy



-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4


I don't believe that achieves what I am after.  I want to set up an internal
user to only be able to send email to a single internal distribution list.

-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4


create custom recipient and set restrictions on it

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4


Can't seem to get into the archives right now...

How do I go about restricting outbound email from a user to only particular
internal recipients?

I see how to stop the receipt of messages unless from specifics, but not how
to restrict outbound.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4

[Ward, Stuart]

I don't believe that achieves what I am after.  I want to set up an internal
user to only be able to send email to a single internal distribution list.

-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4


create custom recipient and set restrictions on it

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4


Can't seem to get into the archives right now...

How do I go about restricting outbound email from a user to only particular
internal recipients?

I see how to stop the receipt of messages unless from specifics, but not how
to restrict outbound.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4

[Ward, Stuart]

Can't seem to get into the archives right now...

How do I go about restricting outbound email from a user to only particular
internal recipients?

I see how to stop the receipt of messages unless from specifics, but not how
to restrict outbound.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 97 Notification

[Ward, Stuart]

I wonder what the 'Oxford English Dictionary' might say...

-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification


Not according to Webster Dictionary

"One entry found for authorise.
 British variant of AUTHORIZE"


As opposed to "authorize" - which does not refer to "authorise" at all.
Must be some sort of British slang or something :=) 


Jerzy

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification


Surely 'authorize' is the variant and the true English spelling is
'authorise'

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification


Boy this list is educational.
Now I know that "authorise" is a British variant of AUTHORIZE.
Very cool.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification


Sure. What's your budget?

> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook 97 Notification
> 
> 
> I have users that look at 2 mailboxes. They have ol set up to 
> display a message when new mail arrives however, this does 
> not work on the secondary mailbox ??? I guess this is the way 
> it is supposed to work but does anyone know how to make it 
> work on both  NT4 Sp6a, Ex 5.5 SP4, OL97
> 
> 
> 
> Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
> London Road  Henley Road 
> Teynham  Paddock Wood 
> Kent Kent 
> ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 
> 
> Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 
> Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 
> 
> All business is conducted in accordance with the company's 
> terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on 
> request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated 
> by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of 
> this company.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 97 Notification

[Ward, Stuart]

Surely 'authorize' is the variant and the true English spelling is
'authorise'

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification


Boy this list is educational.
Now I know that "authorise" is a British variant of AUTHORIZE.
Very cool.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification


Sure. What's your budget?

> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook 97 Notification
> 
> 
> I have users that look at 2 mailboxes. They have ol set up to 
> display a message when new mail arrives however, this does 
> not work on the secondary mailbox ??? I guess this is the way 
> it is supposed to work but does anyone know how to make it 
> work on both  NT4 Sp6a, Ex 5.5 SP4, OL97
> 
> 
> 
> Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
> London Road  Henley Road 
> Teynham  Paddock Wood 
> Kent Kent 
> ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 
> 
> Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 
> Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 
> 
> All business is conducted in accordance with the company's 
> terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on 
> request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated 
> by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of 
> this company.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Where is everyone?

[Ward, Stuart]

I think Italy...

England messed up their chances over the weekend...

Stu
ExPat Brit

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?



Mmm... World Cup.  Sleepless nights...

Lot of people think Argentina will get this one.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


Off celebrating the World Cup?

Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Where is everyone?


Where is everyone?  Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I
wasn't invited to?  Or is everyone hung over from the weekend?  Or am I
getting the silent treatment yet again?

Sigh!

-Felicity

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

[Ward, Stuart]

We had a similar issue last year with our Dell box not recreating the array
correctly after corruption/death of hard disk - all sorts of issues with
firmware level etc.  Had to kill it, recreate and restore...fine since.

Stu

Senegal for the Cup... :o)


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server


Mark my 2 cent's is It would seem to me that you have some type of problem
with the hardware it self either controller or possibly hard drives, likely
the raid controller.

(I had this happen)
For example/usually.. if say your had 3 disks in a raid5. 
One dies/dead gone the two are left running (critical mode) 
so you know which is dead, assume hot swap here, you pull it.
You put in new "identical" drive.
NowDepending on how your particular hardware works and the way it was
setup.
the raid controller will likely (if setup this way) start the rebuild
process on the new drive thus in a matter of time the new drive is back in
the array, thus you are now back to being fault tolerant. It should be
transparent.

Now in my case I have setup my raid 5 arrays, to automatically rebuild, AND
it my controllers case it can prioritize how quickly it does this, thus
determining to "drag" on the system during rebuild.

Thus I can pull the old dead drive, put in the new one and it does all the
rebuild in the background.
How long? depends on lot of things.

I had a similar hardware issues once, it ended up being a over heating
issues on the drives, dues to poor case design. Moved HD's to better case
with proper cooling, has run like charm ever since.

2cents

bill

-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server


I apologise for the OT question...

Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array?
(hardware RAID)

I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the array it
is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error right?

When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical
disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually corrupts)
the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents backups
from completing.

hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't handle
the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in the
process of rebuilding itself...

The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from scratch
and restoring from backup

Any thoughts?

sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday afternoon
Haiku for good measure:

Friday afternoon
gotta get going home 
server is cactus

Thanks,
MP



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Multiple messages

[Ward, Stuart]

yup...

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Multiple messages



Anyone else getting the same group of messages sent to them over and
over and over again?  This is the only list I seem to be having this
problem with.





N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.xrite.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Multiple messages

[Ward, Stuart]

yup...

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Multiple messages



Anyone else getting the same group of messages sent to them over and
over and over again?  This is the only list I seem to be having this
problem with.





N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.xrite.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Dead Letter Mailbox

[Ward, Stuart]

Appropriate NDR's forward to Admin Mailbox

-Original Message-
From: Hawkins, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Dead Letter Mailbox


Hi there

Does anyone know of a solution for handling incoming messages that are going
to NDR because the recipient doesn't exist? I would like the NDRs to happen
normally, but also the mail to be forwarded to a 'Dead Letter Office' for
manual processing.

Thanks

Stuart Hawkins
Network Systems Manager
Bovis Homes Limited
Cheltenham, UK
Tel: 01242 662635
Fax: 01242 662667
www.bovishomes.co.uk





The information in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it is
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance
on its contents is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Any files attached to this email have been checked with virus detection
software before transmission. However, you should carry out your own virus
check before opening any attachment. Bovis Homes Limited accepts no
liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses.

If you have received this e-mail in error please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Slow open of messages with attachments

[Ward, Stuart]

All

We are experiencing some issues with opening emails containing attachments
with the size of attachment not appearing to make a difference.  When a user
clicks on the message to open it or even preview it on machines that we
allow preview pane, it can take 5 seconds or more to actually bring up the
message.

I do not appear to be able to find anything in the archives or on TechNet
and would appreciate it if anyone has seen anything similar and is able to
shed any light on the matter.

Ex5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6a, Outlook 2000

Any help is appreciated

Stu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: AV! a full time job?

[Ward, Stuart]

Who has the ultimate responsibility for the overall functionality of the
network? If it's you, you're the boss  - change the passwords and tell them
to stick it!

-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?


Other departments who have the rights to do it.  We have argued this to the
Nth degree, trust me its beyond all hope.  If we change passwords we get
chewed out and told to change them back.

-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?

How are they joining machines w/o your knowledge? Time to change some
passwords.

-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: AV! a full time job?
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?


Symantec Corporate, 7.5.  Waiting for 7.6 to arrive.  We also will be
purchasing a Mcafee e500.

A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several
departments that are in charge of their own equipment.  Just yesterday
we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't
know about.  All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?

What are you using for your AV solution?

-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?


At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that
does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be
appropriate.

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?

How big is your company?

Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job?  100,000 users?

It varies from org to org.

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the
survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?


I don't think this is a full time job.   If you have a full time
position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses
do not take any vacation.   Instead of having full time position, pay
A/V vendor to notify you (& other support staffs) when there's new virus
via pager, cell phone, email, etc.  If you want to have closer
relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like
Technical Account Manager, TAM.  Once you have those communcation method
established, you have to have software that can distribute updates
automatically and fast.

My two cents...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AV! a full time job?



Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think.  Would you consider
Antivirus a full time job?  I speak for both email and network/desktop.


Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be
getting neglected.  We are around 1300 users right now.

e-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://w

RE: URL as a malicius code.

[Ward, Stuart]

-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: URL as a malicius code.


Can't get that link to work...


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: URL as a malicius code.



Bad... very bad...
http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.asp?pid=36&sid=1&A2=ind0112&L=ntbugtraq&F=P
&S

&P=3038

~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor"


|+--->
||  "Romero, Eric"   |
||  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
||  Sent by: |
||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
||  .swynk.com   |
||   |
||   |
||  12/18/2001 12:29 PM  |
||  Please respond to|
||  "Exchange Discussions"   |
||   |
|+--->
 
>---
---|
  |
|
  |   To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
  |   cc:
|
  |   Subject: URL as a malicius code.
|
 
>---
---|





Hi all

Are you receiving emails with subjects www.celebxtr.cgb.net that creates
url
links in the desktop and start to send massive messages?

Rgds,
-er




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Policing the Police...

[Ward, Stuart]

I agree, unfortunately it is a manager... I need a way to log mailbox access
using another Exchange site's administrative account, my site's admin
account and to log permission changes on my site's recipients.  Is there
something better than trawling through the NT event log?

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Policing the Police...


There are seldom good technological solutions to
behavioral problems.

There's no substitute for mangerial oversight.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

--- "Ward, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all...
> 
> I have been put in a situation where I have to
> monitor activity on my
> exchange box due to some potential dishonesty by a
> colleague.  Have any of
> you implemented any kind of logging either by user
> account or through
> Exchange itself, and if so, what things should I be
> looking for and setting
> up so that I can monitor this activity.
> 
> We run Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT4 SP6 box.
> 
> Any help you can offer would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Stu
> 
>
_
> List posting FAQ:  
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:  
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Policing the Police

[Ward, Stuart]

Sorry... activity such as permission changes on mailboxes and access to
mailboxes when not the owner (aside from system or AV access)

Stu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Policing the Police...

[Ward, Stuart]

Hi all...

I have been put in a situation where I have to monitor activity on my
exchange box due to some potential dishonesty by a colleague.  Have any of
you implemented any kind of logging either by user account or through
Exchange itself, and if so, what things should I be looking for and setting
up so that I can monitor this activity.

We run Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT4 SP6 box.

Any help you can offer would be appreciated.

Thanks

Stu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline Folders Unavailable

[Ward, Stuart]

Recreate profile and ensure 'user travels' is selected

-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline Folders Unavailable


Hi All,

I have a user who converted to Exchange and is using Outlook 2000.  He
wishes to use Offline Folders, but the option is greyed out. 

He's also got Internet email enabled. 

What could cause the Offline folders to be unavailable?   Even in the
Options under Mail Services the option is unavailable.

I've only got 2 hours to figure this out !

Thanks in advance,
Fred

Fred Macondray
Systems Administrator
Virtual Purchase Card, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com

-   "Guaranteed B2B Purchases"


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Repeating Emails

[Ward, Stuart]

We run the IBM eNetwork firewall software and the SMTP mail is passed off
directly to it - the problem only occurs for external mail.

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Repeating Emails


Stu:

Is the message being re-delivered to an internal or external user?

If external, how is your mail relayed:  direct to the firewall or through
another relay server?  What kind of firewall/what kind of relay?

Regards,
Louise

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Repeating Emails

The recipient is not common to all and it happens a few times a month - as
far as I can tell when I get notified!

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Repeating Emails


How often does this happen and is it a different recipient each time or
always the same recipient?



-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Repeating Emails


Hi all

We run an Exchange 5.5 box with SP4

Periodically and without any indication as to the cause we seem to produce
multiple emails to the same SMTP recipient - sometimes up to 100!!

Has anyone else experienced this?  If so, please help as we are unable to
track down the root cause.

Stu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Repeating Emails

[Ward, Stuart]

The recipient is not common to all and it happens a few times a month - as
far as I can tell when I get notified!

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Repeating Emails


How often does this happen and is it a different recipient each time or
always the same recipient?



-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Repeating Emails


Hi all

We run an Exchange 5.5 box with SP4

Periodically and without any indication as to the cause we seem to produce
multiple emails to the same SMTP recipient - sometimes up to 100!!

Has anyone else experienced this?  If so, please help as we are unable to
track down the root cause.

Stu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Repeating Emails

[Ward, Stuart]

Hi all

We run an Exchange 5.5 box with SP4

Periodically and without any indication as to the cause we seem to produce
multiple emails to the same SMTP recipient - sometimes up to 100!!

Has anyone else experienced this?  If so, please help as we are unable to
track down the root cause.

Stu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]