RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-20 Thread Hunter, Lori


If it isn't in writing, I don't go there.  If there's a lawsuit, I have that
permission in writing.

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the
Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there
has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title.  As far as
accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems
them might be having?  We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems,
inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their
credentials 3 or 4 times a day.  We then ask them to change their password.
But all Mail Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and
their passwords, you can get into anybody's mailbox.  But does that mean you
should?  No.  I have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and
opened it to see what the contents were.  But I have worked with some people
who have done it.  There's where the trust has to come into play.  I even
showed management that they had logged into some very highly sensitive
mailboxes.  They then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network
and were eventually let go.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


 
>>there is implicit trust

That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not
touching it.

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to
call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to
be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the
CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents.
But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly
sensitive documents are passed through the mail system.  You are expected
not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager
has been sending emails out about.  It may not be written in some companies,
but it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay out of
people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive
documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He
has to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the news

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread William Lefkovics
 
As a landlord as well, I pay a management company to take care of those
things.

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Way back when I was an administrator, I never opened a mailbox unless I
was on the phone with the person and asked for permission first.  I'm
also a landlord.  I'd never let myself into one of my tenant's
apartments without first asking permission unless it was on fire or
water was running out of it.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


 
I disagree with you.  As an Exchange Administrator, granted specific
permissions, I have that ability.

I for one, NEVER access users' mailboxes.  Ever.  Should there be such a
need the manager of the person requesting access is granted access.

Such access is not a 'right'.  

William Lefkovics
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I disagree with you.  As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your
job to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a
problem, or if asked to by their manager/supervisor.  As any Mail
Administrator should tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the
right to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down
simply because I am an Exchange Administrator?  I don't think so.  The
company has that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility
to you, I would be carefull.  However, if it is something you would see
in the course of doing your daily job, then that is different.

Dennis 

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Ed Crowley
So act when all hell breaks loose.  Or ask the CEO if he wants you to
act as censor.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this
far. As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are
eye opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce
the policy.  Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some
employee gets bent about seeing a picture or reading something
offensive.  Then all hell breaks loose.  And indeed as with any job
there are ethics of behavior.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the
Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows
there has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title.
As far as accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot
what problems them might be having?  We open Users' mailboxes that are
having problems, inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox
with their credentials 3 or 4 times a day.  We then ask them to change
their password. But all Mail Administrators know that if you know
certain AD accounts and their passwords, you can get into anybody's
mailbox.  But does that mean you should?  No.  I have never just
randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what the
contents were.  But I have worked with some people who have done it.
There's where the trust has to come into play.  I even showed management
that they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes.  They
then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were
eventually let go.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


 
>>there is implicit trust

That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not
touching it.

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want
to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your
power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality
of, oh say, the CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and
accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of
high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail
system.  You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what
your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about.  It
may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others.  And
I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they
will trust you not to look at sensitive documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.
He has to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exce

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Ed Crowley
Way back when I was an administrator, I never opened a mailbox unless I
was on the phone with the person and asked for permission first.  I'm
also a landlord.  I'd never let myself into one of my tenant's
apartments without first asking permission unless it was on fire or
water was running out of it.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


 
I disagree with you.  As an Exchange Administrator, granted specific
permissions, I have that ability.

I for one, NEVER access users' mailboxes.  Ever.  Should there be such a
need the manager of the person requesting access is granted access.

Such access is not a 'right'.  

William Lefkovics
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I disagree with you.  As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your
job to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a
problem, or if asked to by their manager/supervisor.  As any Mail
Administrator should tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the
right to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down
simply because I am an Exchange Administrator?  I don't think so.  The
company has that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility
to you, I would be carefull.  However, if it is something you would see
in the course of doing your daily job, then that is different.

Dennis 

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Ed Crowley
Perhaps you should add "Babysitter" to your job title!

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Management knows I run scanmail with emanager and have the filter to
catch profanity among other things.  When a message meets the criteria
it is archived and I look at the messages only then.  I have already
made the decision to make no exceptions and expect everyone to follow
the AUP.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Jackson, Siobhan (ATG)
"Now come on Father, what would you say to a nice cup of tea?"

-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


If you don't like it, then do like Father Jack and yell, "DRINK! GIRLS!
FECK!" a lot. Sure makes the day fly by.

(:=

[snip]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
If it violates policy, let HR send out the order to block the specific word
in emails. If someone's mailbox needs to be browsed and ripped through, let
the C*O do it and the IT guy stay out of the way.

In other words, there is no technical solution. It's up to a given company
to determine what it wants its level of liability to be.

If you don't like it, then do like Father Jack and yell, "DRINK! GIRLS!
FECK!" a lot. Sure makes the day fly by.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Yea but the question is the word "f^uck" really something that violates
a company policy? I know here that in that case it wouldn't be. But if
it was used in a violent or s^xual context then it would be.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread B. van Ouwerkerk
It's not up to you to tell what is or is not against a company policy.
You don't have to understand it..



--B.

There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of the law.
No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer interprets the truth.
-- Jean Giradoux



At 13:37 18-12-2002 -0800, you wrote:

Yea but the question is the word "f^uck" really something that violates
a company policy? I know here that in that case it wouldn't be. But if
it was used in a violent or s^xual context then it would be.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this
far. As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are
eye opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce
the policy.  Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some
employee gets bent about seeing a picture or reading something
offensive.  Then all hell breaks loose.  And indeed as with any job
there are ethics of behavior.

Jim



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
Yea but the question is the word "f^uck" really something that violates
a company policy? I know here that in that case it wouldn't be. But if
it was used in a violent or s^xual context then it would be.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this
far. As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are
eye opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce
the policy.  Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some
employee gets bent about seeing a picture or reading something
offensive.  Then all hell breaks loose.  And indeed as with any job
there are ethics of behavior.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the
Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows
there has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title.
As far as accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot
what problems them might be having?  We open Users' mailboxes that are
having problems, inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox
with their credentials 3 or 4 times a day.  We then ask them to change
their password. But all Mail Administrators know that if you know
certain AD accounts and their passwords, you can get into anybody's
mailbox.  But does that mean you should?  No.  I have never just
randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what the
contents were.  But I have worked with some people who have done it.
There's where the trust has to come into play.  I even showed management
that they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes.  They
then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were
eventually let go.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


 
>>there is implicit trust

That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not
touching it.

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want
to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your
power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality
of, oh say, the CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and
accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of
high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail
system.  You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what
your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about.  It
may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others.  And
I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they
will trust you not to look at sensitive documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.
He has to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
except

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Johansson Patrick

Well, in Finland working for a telecommunications operator (little known
fact :) and asp, just starting to look at logs, who sent what to whom would
get me jailed up for up to 3 years without the appropriate permissions from
the people involved  :-P . It's like you were tapping somebodys phone but
graver since you have the control you do when managing the systems.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18. joulukuuta 2002 23:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


IANAL, but I do know that the legality of accessing mail in a mailbox varies
greatly depending on the jurisdiction. And since IANAL, I know better than
to try and figure out whether it may or may not be legal for myself or
someone else to do so. I leave that determination to the blood sucking ogres
we pay to know such things.

On 12/18/02 13:47, "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:



Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's 
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in 
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember -- 
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS. 

Gèoff... 


-Original Message- 
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter 


>From my point of view: 
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, 
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get 
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is 
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an 
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that 
will be used and abused by everyone. 

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, 
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it 
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers 
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. 
Sincerly, 

Rachel 

-Original Message- 
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Blocking a newsletter 


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other 
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?

My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then 
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a 
work address. 

Jim Liddil 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread James Liddil
Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this far.
As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are eye
opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce the
policy.  Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some employee
gets bent about seeing a picture or reading something offensive.  Then all
hell breaks loose.  And indeed as with any job there are ethics of behavior.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the Mail
Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there has to
be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title.  As far as
accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems
them might be having?  We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems,
inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their credentials
3 or 4 times a day.  We then ask them to change their password. But all Mail
Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and their passwords,
you can get into anybody's mailbox.  But does that mean you should?  No.  I
have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what
the contents were.  But I have worked with some people who have done it.
There's where the trust has to come into play.  I even showed management that
they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes.  They then asked
me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were eventually let go.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


 
>>there is implicit trust

That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not
touching it.

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to
call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to
be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the
CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But
as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly
sensitive documents are passed through the mail system.  You are expected not
to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has
been sending emails out about.  It may not be written in some companies, but
it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay out of
people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive
documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has
to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what
are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you
fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally
enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and
that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and
abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel


Re: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Chris Scharff
IANAL, but I do know that the legality of accessing mail in a mailbox varies
greatly depending on the jurisdiction. And since IANAL, I know better than
to try and figure out whether it may or may not be legal for myself or
someone else to do so. I leave that determination to the blood sucking ogres
we pay to know such things.

On 12/18/02 13:47, "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:



Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's 
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in 
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember -- 
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS. 

Gèoff... 


-Original Message- 
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter 


>From my point of view: 
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, 
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get 
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is 
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an 
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that 
will be used and abused by everyone. 

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, 
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it 
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers 
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. 
Sincerly, 

Rachel 

-Original Message- 
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Blocking a newsletter 


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other 
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?

My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then 
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a 
work address. 

Jim Liddil 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Funny.  My dictionary doesn't have the word Exchange Administrator in it.
Oh well, guess everything I said before you can forget.  LOL

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


I think you need to check the Dictionary.com site again.  

<>

That implies not only the ability, but the sanction.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


That's what I said in the beginning.  You may the "rights" to do it, but
that doesn't mean you should.  I don't go anywhere that a manager or
supervisor tells me to.  We get User requests all the time asking for access
to a User's mailbox that has left the Company.  We bounce it back to them
and tell them they need managerial approval.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Um, no.  Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been
given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's
email.  I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff
when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts.
The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given.  Since my
boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of
newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be
fired.

If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied.  there is a
difference.  www.dictionary.com?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Drew Nicholson
I think you need to check the Dictionary.com site again.  

<>

That implies not only the ability, but the sanction.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


That's what I said in the beginning.  You may the "rights" to do it, but that doesn't 
mean you should.  I don't go anywhere that a manager or supervisor tells me to.  We 
get User requests all the time asking for access to a User's mailbox that has left the 
Company.  We bounce it back to them and tell them they need managerial approval.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Um, no.  Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given 
permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email.  I have the 
ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made 
an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts. The only tasks I do are ones that I 
have been specifically given.  Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' 
mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I 
could (rightly) be fired.

If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied.  there is a difference.  
www.dictionary.com?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
That's what I said in the beginning.  You may the "rights" to do it, but
that doesn't mean you should.  I don't go anywhere that a manager or
supervisor tells me to.  We get User requests all the time asking for access
to a User's mailbox that has left the Company.  We bounce it back to them
and tell them they need managerial approval.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Um, no.  Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been
given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's
email.  I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff
when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts.
The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given.  Since my
boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of
newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be
fired.

If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied.  there is a
difference.  www.dictionary.com?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to
call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to
be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the
CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents.
But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity.  Highly
sensitive documents are passed through the mail system.  You are expected
not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager
has been sending emails out about.  It may not be written in some companies,
but it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay out of
people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive
documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.  He
has to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the
Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there
has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title.  As far as
accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems
them might be having?  We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems,
inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their
credentials 3 or 4 times a day.  We then ask them to change their password.
But all Mail Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and
their passwords, you can get into anybody's mailbox.  But does that mean you
should?  No.  I have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and
opened it to see what the contents were.  But I have worked with some people
who have done it.  There's where the trust has to come into play.  I even
showed management that they had logged into some very highly sensitive
mailboxes.  They then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network
and were eventually let go.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


 
>>there is implicit trust

That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not
touching it.

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to
call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to
be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the
CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents.
But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly
sensitive documents are passed through the mail system.  You are expected
not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager
has been sending emails out about.  It may not be written in some companies,
but it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay out of
people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive
documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He
has to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting 

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Drew Nicholson
Um, no.  Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given 
permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email.  I have the 
ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made 
an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts.  The only tasks I do are ones that I 
have been specifically given.  Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' 
mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I 
could (rightly) be fired.

If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied.  there is a difference.  
www.dictionary.com?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call 
yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to 
view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO.  You 
have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, 
it is a position of high sensitivity.  Highly sensitive documents are passed through 
the mail system.  You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your 
boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about.  It may not be written 
in some companies, but it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay 
out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive 
documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he 
has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.  He has to be tasked with 
it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail.  That 
mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser 
would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's 
equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you 
doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have 
been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end 
user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink 
in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking 
advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says 
so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to 
scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the 
newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask 
the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not 
have this kind of thing sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread William Lefkovics
 
>>there is implicit trust

That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not
touching it.

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want
to
call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your
power to
be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say,
the
CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and accounting
documents.
But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity.
Highly
sensitive documents are passed through the mail system.  You are
expected
not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other
manager
has been sending emails out about.  It may not be written in some
companies,
but it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay out
of
people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive
documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.
He
has to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything
in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to
a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread William Lefkovics
 
Of course they know... they made the decision to run it, right?

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Management knows I run scanmail with emanager and have the filter to
catch
profanity among other things.  When a message meets the criteria it is
archived and I look at the messages only then.  I have already made the
decision to make no exceptions and expect everyone to follow the AUP.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what
are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you
fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally
enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception,
and
that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used
and
abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread William Lefkovics
 
I disagree with you.  As an Exchange Administrator, granted specific
permissions, I have that ability.

I for one, NEVER access users' mailboxes.  Ever.  Should there be such a
need the manager of the person requesting access is granted access.

Such access is not a 'right'.  

William Lefkovics
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I disagree with you.  As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your
job
to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a problem,
or
if asked to by their manager/supervisor.  As any Mail Administrator
should
tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the
right
to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down
simply
because I am an Exchange Administrator?  I don't think so.  The company
has
that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility to you, I
would
be carefull.  However, if it is something you would see in the course of
doing your daily job, then that is different.

Dennis 

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything
in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember
--
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to
a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   htt

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Roger Seielstad
My gut reaction to taking a hit of Diet Pepsi would be to hurl. 

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
> 
> 
> My gut reaction would be to take a hit of diet pepsi and ask 
> myself why I felt so threatened by this newsletter. If i 
> still felt this way after i finished the whole can, I'd 
> probably go and ask them why, and if it were not for work 
> purposes I'd ask them to consider unsubbing. 
>  
> But then by the time I drunk a whole tin of pepsi I would 
> probably have remembered something else more important to the 
> running of the network to do instead.
> 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Wed 18/12/2002 16:14 
>   To: Exchange Discussions 
>   Cc: 
>   Subject: Blocking a newsletter
>   
>   
> 
>   Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or 
> appears to be) to the
>   f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name 
> there is other
>   profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company 
> policy or let it slide?
>   My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are 
> subscribed and then politely
>   ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing 
> sent to a work
>   address.
>   
>   Jim Liddil
>   
>   
> _
>   List posting FAQ:   
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


.+--xm,)瑳r(ﺷ\bಽ!豶0꧑&zǚì°±rí¥¬:.˛
m隊[hy⽴\z[,睰)r≄Z Zvh䲧+-i٢2૞G(

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to
call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to
be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the
CEO or CFO.  You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents.
But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity.  Highly
sensitive documents are passed through the mail system.  You are expected
not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager
has been sending emails out about.  It may not be written in some companies,
but it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay out of
people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive
documents.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it
appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.  He
has to be tasked with it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Roger Seielstad
No, no they don't.

In fact, I know of multiple occasions in which people (including coworkers
of mine) were fired for accessing someone else's mailbox without prior
approval.

Yes, the email is the company's property. That does not imply, however, that
the admins can look through it at their leisure. In most companies,
including every one in which I have worked, its an instantly terminatable
offense.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
> 
> 
> Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to 
> browse ANYONE's
> mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't 
> be anything in
> there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. 
>  Remember --
> the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.
> 
> Gèoff...
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
> 
> 
> From my point of view:
> If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a 
> written order,
> what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, 
> and can get
> you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
> normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
> exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your 
> armour that
> will be used and abused by everyone.
> 
> I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I 
> must tell you,
> taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
> because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places 
> Hummert considers
> normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
> Sincerly,
> 
> Rachel
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Blocking a newsletter
> 
> 
> Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to 
> be) to the
> f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
> profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy 
> or let it slide?
> My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
> politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of 
> thing sent to a
> work address.
> 
> Jim Liddil
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Drew Nicholson
that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he 
has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.  He has to be tasked with 
it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail.  That 
mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser 
would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's 
equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you 
doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have 
been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end 
user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink 
in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking 
advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says 
so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to 
scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the 
newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask 
the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not 
have this kind of thing sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Robert Moir
My gut reaction would be to take a hit of diet pepsi and ask myself why I felt so 
threatened by this newsletter. If i still felt this way after i finished the whole 
can, I'd probably go and ask them why, and if it were not for work purposes I'd ask 
them to consider unsubbing. 
 
But then by the time I drunk a whole tin of pepsi I would probably have remembered 
something else more important to the running of the network to do instead.

-Original Message- 
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wed 18/12/2002 16:14 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: Blocking a newsletter



Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work
address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


ŠËi¢Ëbž@Bm§ÿðÃ0Šw¢oëzÊ.­Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ŸÿÃ
,Ã)är‰¿²+^±æ«rìyªÜ…«)N‹§²æìr¸›zf¢–Ú%y«Þ{!jx–Ë0Êy¢a1r§ââ²Öš)åŠËZvh§³§‘Ê&


RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
I disagree with you.  As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your job
to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a problem, or
if asked to by their manager/supervisor.  As any Mail Administrator should
tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right
to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply
because I am an Exchange Administrator?  I don't think so.  The company has
that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility to you, I would
be carefull.  However, if it is something you would see in the course of
doing your daily job, then that is different.

Dennis 

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
I hate those guys

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


Damn Hummerts keep posting.

- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Damn liberals keep screwing everything up

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


  Well, that opens an entirely different discussion.  We drafted a
consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and
all information coming in or out of the company's communications
avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file.
  In this day and age, with "human rights" litigation running rampant, a
company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy
issues.

Alex


- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.
It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Depp, Dennis M.
While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right to review 
anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply because I am an 
Exchange Administrator?  I don't think so.  The company has that privlege, but unless 
they transfer that responsibility to you, I would be carefull.  However, if it is 
something you would see in the course of doing your daily job, then that is different.

Dennis 

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail.  That 
mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser 
would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's 
equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you 
doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have 
been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end 
user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink 
in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking 
advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says 
so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to 
scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the 
newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask 
the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not 
have this kind of thing sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
We just went through the same thing pertaining strictly to emails.  No
personal emails that you wouldn't want the Company to see and access at all
times to anyone's mailbox.  In this day and age, too many lawsuits are
swayed by emails that documented an employee or employer's actions.

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Alexander Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


  Well, that opens an entirely different discussion.  We drafted a consent
form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all
information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and
it's kept in the employee's file.
  In this day and age, with "human rights" litigation running rampant, a
company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues.

Alex


- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Rachel Pickens
No need to shout. 
Yes he has the right, but it should be excercised with caution and the boss backing 
you 100%.
But the way it the original message read to me ( and that perception has been cleared 
up) He  have been randomly sampling for his own amusement. He wasn't. I have 
known very ignorant or un-ethical admins. that would and do. Don't look at the clients 
email without a reason. He had reason and policy backing him, and he chose to stick 
with policy. Very ethical of him.

rachel

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Andy David
Damn Hummerts keep posting.

- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Damn liberals keep screwing everything up

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


  Well, that opens an entirely different discussion.  We drafted a
consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and
all information coming in or out of the company's communications
avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file.
  In this day and age, with "human rights" litigation running rampant, a
company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy
issues.

Alex


- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.
It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Mellott, Bill
block it all...

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Damn liberals keep screwing everything up

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


  Well, that opens an entirely different discussion.  We drafted a
consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and
all information coming in or out of the company's communications
avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file.
  In this day and age, with "human rights" litigation running rampant, a
company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy
issues.

Alex


- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.
It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
Damn liberals keep screwing everything up

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


  Well, that opens an entirely different discussion.  We drafted a
consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and
all information coming in or out of the company's communications
avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file.
  In this day and age, with "human rights" litigation running rampant, a
company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy
issues.

Alex


- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse
ANYONE's mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be
anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else
seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.
It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Alexander Wall
  Well, that opens an entirely different discussion.  We drafted a consent form that 
every employee must sign, giving us access to
any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and 
it's kept in the employee's file.
  In this day and age, with "human rights" litigation running rampant, a company can 
no longer count on the common-sense approach to
privacy issues.

Alex


- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail.  That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

Gèoff...


-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get
you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is
normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that
will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a
work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread James Liddil
Management knows I run scanmail with emanager and have the filter to catch
profanity among other things.  When a message meets the criteria it is
archived and I look at the messages only then.  I have already made the
decision to make no exceptions and expect everyone to follow the AUP.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what
are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you
fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally
enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and
that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and
abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you,
taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it
because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers
normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work
address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
Forums.somethingawful.com come join us in FYAD..you'll love it there
:)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order,
what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can
get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what
is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an
exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour
that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell
you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do
it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert
considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of
my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Rachel Pickens
>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you 
doing browsing someone else' mail?
Its bad form, and can get you fired.
If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced.
Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception 
will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking 
advice from Hummert is a bad idea.
Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places 
Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin.
Sincerly,

Rachel

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work
address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Tom Meunier
Jim,

Phytoceutica is a big company that makes really complex medicine-thingies.  You have 
access to brilliant lawyers.  WTF are you talking to a bunch of techno-weenies for?  
Print out your AUP and go walk into your general counsel's office.

-tom

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:24 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Blocking a newsletter
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped?  Sure
it is a fine line.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work
address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Alexander Wall
  I just figure out whether I like the person or not, and base it on my personal 
opinion.  It's good to be king!

  ;-)

Alex

- Original Message - 
From: "Drew Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 09:43
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


If they forward that email, and someone gets offended, it's a different
issue.  But simply subscribing to it?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped?
Sure it is a fine line.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Drew Nicholson
If they forward that email, and someone gets offended, it's a different
issue.  But simply subscribing to it?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped?
Sure it is a fine line.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Andy David
Check with HR. Put the ball in their court.

- Original Message -
From: "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped?  Sure
it is a fine line.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work
address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
Yea but there's a difference between the context of @ss-raped (which is
a description of a violent act upon another person) and f^ckedcompany
(which describes a company). Seems like 2 different lines to me

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped?
Sure it is a fine line.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread James Liddil
I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped?  Sure
it is a fine line.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work
address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Martin Blackstone
I agree. The only thing that hurts them is the name.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


One could argue that the newsletter is similar to subscribing to the WSJ
newsletter or a Motley Fool newsletter, since it provides insight into
companies which may be in your industry or which the user might be invested.
I browse the f-kedcompany.com website once a month at least to see what's
going on in the industry... I've even forwarded content to my boss.  Not
knowing what the company policy is though.. Not sure I can offer guidance.

On 12/18/02 10:14, "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other 
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?

My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely 
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work 
address. 

Jim Liddil 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
You could also argue that the content on that website leads to better
business decisions within your own company, by pointing out the
stupidity of others

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter


One could argue that the newsletter is similar to subscribing to the WSJ
newsletter or a Motley Fool newsletter, since it provides insight into
companies which may be in your industry or which the user might be
invested. I browse the f-kedcompany.com website once a month at least to
see what's going on in the industry... I've even forwarded content to my
boss.  Not knowing what the company policy is though.. Not sure I can
offer guidance.

On 12/18/02 10:14, "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other 
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide?

My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely 
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work 
address. 

Jim Liddil 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Drew Nicholson
Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Chris Scharff
One could argue that the newsletter is similar to subscribing to the WSJ
newsletter or a Motley Fool newsletter, since it provides insight into
companies which may be in your industry or which the user might be invested.
I browse the f-kedcompany.com website once a month at least to see what's
going on in the industry... I've even forwarded content to my boss.  Not
knowing what the company policy is though.. Not sure I can offer guidance.

On 12/18/02 10:14, "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other 
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide?

My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then
politely 
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work 
address. 

Jim Liddil 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
Oh here's an interesting story about Robin Wolaner who worked for Cnet
and blocked access to f^uckedcompany.com. She was harassed and
humiliated by the people that checked out that site that she actually
quit her job

http://www.internalmemos.com/memos/memodetails.php?memo_id=7
http://www.internalmemos.com/memos/memodetails.php?memo_id=1164

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking a newsletter

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
No you should let it go. It's a pretty good news letter. Check out the
site and see what I mean, they basically talk about how screwed up some
company policies are and they have good stories on them. Thus the name

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it
slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and
then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing
sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]