RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
eManager is working great for me using the mapi version...only I don't like that the auto download can only be configured for one time a weekit seems like trend is updating the antispam file every day now. It is catching way more spam than I ever thought we were gettingonly problem is I wish It coul scan non deliverable mail but when it is sent to the postmaster, the headers are gone.any one know how to get around this?, cause I have a handful of users who don't work here anymore and they are spammed to death..filling my postmaster box every day.. Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Not the emanager component -Original Message- From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Is this included in their Neatsuite ? Similar to the gateway scanner included in NAV CE? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc). I have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server. The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1% example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP). I second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one). I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter when the subject contains the offensive language. So we switched to the MAPI version. This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to configure this product to scan incoming mail only. Users attempt to save contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word and they disappear. A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway instead. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?. I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified, not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see any notification. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Not the emanager component -Original Message- From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Is this included in their Neatsuite ? Similar to the gateway scanner included in NAV CE? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc). I have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server. The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1% example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP). I second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one). I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter when the subject contains the offensive language. So we switched to the MAPI version. This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to configure this product to scan incoming mail only. Users attempt to save contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word and they disappear. A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway instead. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?. I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified, not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see any notification. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Is this included in their Neatsuite ? Similar to the gateway scanner included in NAV CE? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc). I have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server. The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1% example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP). I second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one). I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter when the subject contains the offensive language. So we switched to the MAPI version. This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to configure this product to scan incoming mail only. Users attempt to save contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word and they disappear. A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway instead. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?. I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified, not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see any notification. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http:/
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Right, if it blocked messages with XXX in the message body, it might be important to know that if you work for the Texas Chili Parlor. But without access to those default rules o the ability to edit them, for some organizations that means not using them (which means more time manually building your own). > -Original Message- > From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > Oh, I forgot about that - you're talking about the anti-spam > rules which they provide in an encrypted file, right?? I'm > not sure what the point in preventing "us" from seeing this. > Trend sent me an unencrypted copy of the file (trend$rf) when > I asked them; but I'm not going to ask for a new copy every > time the file is updated, and it would be convenient to > verify what they are scanning for. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc). I have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server. The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1% example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP). I second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one). I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter when the subject contains the offensive language. So we switched to the MAPI version. This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to configure this product to scan incoming mail only. Users attempt to save contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word and they disappear. A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway instead. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?. I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified, not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see any notification. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Oh, I forgot about that - you're talking about the anti-spam rules which they provide in an encrypted file, right?? I'm not sure what the point in preventing "us" from seeing this. Trend sent me an unencrypted copy of the file (trend$rf) when I asked them; but I'm not going to ask for a new copy every time the file is updated, and it would be convenient to verify what they are scanning for. Tech support did provide me with a valuable shortcut to adding items to the Anti-Spam (header filter only). Instead of opening the eManager interface for each server, typing in the password 4 times, and modifying the anti-spam filter 4 times (one on each of my 4 servers), you can edit the spamrule.txt file on one server and copy this file to each server with a batch file. (saves me a ton of frustration, cause I was in the habit of clicking on OK after making a change on one server and this action abruptly exits eManager.) I had to turn off the content filter (which scans the entire message body) due to the extreme performance hit this took on my primary Exchange server. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in the top 10). > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > Hello all, > > Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block > SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter when the subject contains the offensive language. So we switched to the MAPI version. This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to configure this product to scan incoming mail only. Users attempt to save contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word and they disappear. A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway instead. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?. I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified, not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see any notification. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Depends entirely on your needs and budget. My placement of it was in terms of total features offered. If the eManager product has the right features and price for a given org, then it's certainly a valid choice. > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > What would you recommend? > > I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and > it works great. > > > Brian Dugas > MIS Director > Summit Technical Services, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.summit-technical.com > Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 > Fax: 401-738-9813 > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. > There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on > what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just > fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in > the top 10). > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block > SPAM? If > > you are, thoughts - positive/negative? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Antigen v6.5 by Sybari. Gold package coming out soon, which will have additional features. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What would you recommend? I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works great. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in the top 10). > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > Hello all, > > Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If > you are, thoughts - positive/negative? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
What would you recommend? I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works great. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in the top 10). > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > Hello all, > > Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block > SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?. I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified, not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see any notification. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in the top 10). > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this > > > Hello all, > > Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block > SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
