RE: Guys, I really need your help with this one, I am totally baffled
I had this same problem just this week. In the Event Viewer (not sure which log, system,application,etc..) I had a lot of errors saying that the exchange server did not belong to the Exchange Domain Servers group. Exchange kept trying to add the computer account to the group but failed. What I did was reinstall SP2 and restarted and that fixed it for me. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Guys, I really need your help with this one, I am totally baffled It's Saturday, and my previous experience of posts on the weekends is that they understandably end up in the Monday morning recycle bin, so I am hoping that somebody picks up on the topic here :-) E2K Enterprise SP2, W2K SP2 Last week I created 3 new user accounts, and when prompted to create a mailbox, specified the server I wanted them on, etc. When I looked at the properties for the user, they indicated the mailbox resides on the server I specified. However, on the email addresses tab it was blank, nada, nothing, and the mailboxes did not show on the store on the server, and the users were not in the GAL. I posted this, but did not get too far. Normally, my default recipient policy will apply about 15 SMTP addresses to any new user or contact I create. Today, I created about 6 new contacts in the AD, and entered SMTP addresses for each of them. Again the email address tab for each contact is blank, and the contact does not show in the GAL. Then, add to this, that sometimes my display name appends a GDY to the end, when there are no such policies, entries on my account properties for alias or display name. I am thinking there is a problem in the AD itself, but to be fair, I moved to Enterprise a few weeks back, and I cannot recall adding a user or contact until now, so it may be to do with that. (But I did re-apply SP2 after the upgrade!) I am really quite baffled (as stated), and a bit frustrated as the contacts I added were for Western Union, so kinda useful for us. Anyhow, any insights will be totally appreciated! Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + IGameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
AW: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs?
...didn't go throught in the 1st place... Some books to read, perhaps? http://www.abuse.net/books.html and http://spam.abuse.net/ Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2002 19:27 An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Betreff: RE: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs? I tried that once, but Milton's $250/hour was too pricey for me. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs? Milton, please contact me offline. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The best solution to not get unwanted email, is to become a beach bum in > some third world country that has no phone lines. > > By the way, you have anonymous LDAP access on your server, Even if your > users don=92t give out there email addresses. A bored Spammer could = > leach > your entire address book and sell the addresses.=20 > > Milton R Dogg > Of The Dogg Foundation.. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:59 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs? > > > Alright. We do not have any content filtering software on our Exchange > server at this time. As most Exchange admins are aware, content > filtering software can cause just as many headaches after it's been > installed prior to it being installed at all. > > The best way to prevent unwanted spam seems to be for users NOT to give > out their email address over the web (surveys, etc.), not to sign up for > newsletters, not to do online ordering, and other obvious things. I'm > wondering if there's a document out there that someone has used that > explains these things in detail? Basically a "How to prevent unwanted > email - faq" or something like that that I can send out to our users... > > Any idea? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Guys, I really need your help with this one, I am totally baffled
it looks like as a default in the replication between exch2000 servers ans DNS1 Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Clayton To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 10:19 PM Subject: Guys, I really need your help with this one, I am totally baffled It's Saturday, and my previous experience of posts on the weekends is that they understandably end up in the Monday morning recycle bin, so I am hoping that somebody picks up on the topic here :-) E2K Enterprise SP2, W2K SP2 Last week I created 3 new user accounts, and when prompted to create a mailbox, specified the server I wanted them on, etc. When I looked at the properties for the user, they indicated the mailbox resides on the server I specified. However, on the email addresses tab it was blank, nada, nothing, and the mailboxes did not show on the store on the server, and the users were not in the GAL. I posted this, but did not get too far. Normally, my default recipient policy will apply about 15 SMTP addresses to any new user or contact I create. Today, I created about 6 new contacts in the AD, and entered SMTP addresses for each of them. Again the email address tab for each contact is blank, and the contact does not show in the GAL. Then, add to this, that sometimes my display name appends a GDY to the end, when there are no such policies, entries on my account properties for alias or display name. I am thinking there is a problem in the AD itself, but to be fair, I moved to Enterprise a few weeks back, and I cannot recall adding a user or contact until now, so it may be to do with that. (But I did re-apply SP2 after the upgrade!) I am really quite baffled (as stated), and a bit frustrated as the contacts I added were for Western Union, so kinda useful for us. Anyhow, any insights will be totally appreciated! Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + IGameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Guys, I really need your help with this one, I am totally baffled
It's Saturday, and my previous experience of posts on the weekends is that they understandably end up in the Monday morning recycle bin, so I am hoping that somebody picks up on the topic here :-) E2K Enterprise SP2, W2K SP2 Last week I created 3 new user accounts, and when prompted to create a mailbox, specified the server I wanted them on, etc. When I looked at the properties for the user, they indicated the mailbox resides on the server I specified. However, on the email addresses tab it was blank, nada, nothing, and the mailboxes did not show on the store on the server, and the users were not in the GAL. I posted this, but did not get too far. Normally, my default recipient policy will apply about 15 SMTP addresses to any new user or contact I create. Today, I created about 6 new contacts in the AD, and entered SMTP addresses for each of them. Again the email address tab for each contact is blank, and the contact does not show in the GAL. Then, add to this, that sometimes my display name appends a GDY to the end, when there are no such policies, entries on my account properties for alias or display name. I am thinking there is a problem in the AD itself, but to be fair, I moved to Enterprise a few weeks back, and I cannot recall adding a user or contact until now, so it may be to do with that. (But I did re-apply SP2 after the upgrade!) I am really quite baffled (as stated), and a bit frustrated as the contacts I added were for Western Union, so kinda useful for us. Anyhow, any insights will be totally appreciated! Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + IGameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly
I have seen this too, though not as frequently. Event messages seem to be non existent as to when or why, although I haven't had it happen recently, and it did definitely happen more prior to ESP1. Currently running W2K+SP2+E2K+ESP1. Right now, more often then the exchange store dismounting unexpectedly, we are instead seeing the groupshield stops running for no reason. The only thing I did notice when either happens, is that although restarting the store (or GS) will work, it would fail again in a couple of days or less. Rebooting the entire server it will run for many weeks without incident... Lately there has been enough critical updates from Microsoft's update site that the exchange servers haven't been up more then a month at a time anyways after we put ESP1 on several months ago... Windows does make our Novell and Unix servers look good with very few required updates requiring a reboot... > -Original Message- > From: Sonny Meza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:55 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Cc: Michael Hoelscher; Dan Reed; John Moreland; Bill Brown > Subject: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly > > > We've had problems with our Exchange store dismounting > unexpectedly. This happens quite often - sometimes two or > three times a week. We are using GroupShield anti-virus > software. Other than that, we have nothing else running on > that server. Has anyone experienced this problem? Would > appreciate any thoughts or ideas we could get. Thanks. > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-> software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and > FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-> software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and > FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: wow
Title: Message I think I misread. Sounds messy though. -Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Actually Michael is correct, we have this solution already in place, no third party products. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and m
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
What do you mean? Arcserv backs up great! It's the restore that doesn't work! :) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups While ArcCrap might follow the DR whitepapers, it has the problem of say... "NOT WORKING" ever. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Still doesn't answer the original question. Arcserve is a running joke on this list, and yet it follows the DR Whitepapers requirements. I used BE, with a Travan Tape drive, which sucks, but it also follows the DR Whitepaper requirements. Hopefully the DR Whitepaper will continue to be a "living document". It wasn't all that long ago that Antigen wasn't exactly a recommended MS solution, and therefore not "accepted" by a whole bunch of Exchange experts. And now look. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of us were to call PSS (god forbid), they would most likely tell us "DUDE, You are so NOT supported". The DR Whitepapers are pretty specific. There are many ways to backup an Exchange server. There are right ways and there are wrong ways. However, in order to best ensure that you are always able to recover your exchange server without losing any email, one should follow the DR steps that MS outlines and one should practice test restores. I do online backups of my exchange server with NT Backup right now. Mostly because my soon to be ex-boss uses ArcCrap to backup the network. When I migrated them from Send Mail to Exchange I specifically noted that they will NOT install ArcCrap on my Exchange server that I'll use plain old vanilla NT Backup. Do I like using NT Backup, no, not really, but I am re-evaluating our backup solution now so I can put something more reliable to me in place that backups the entire enterprise... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's "current" environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it "is" or "is not" a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... "No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk." He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say "No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange." but don't go on to say as to why?... so
RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly
Crystal ball broke. -Original Message- From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly really? Pat "Ray Zorz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" et> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: 01/11/2002 07:23 Subject: RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly PM Please respond to "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" Versions and event messages would be helpful. -Original Message- From: Sonny Meza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: Michael Hoelscher; Dan Reed; John Moreland; Bill Brown Subject: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly We've had problems with our Exchange store dismounting unexpectedly. This happens quite often - sometimes two or three times a week. We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. Other than that, we have nothing else running on that server. Has anyone experienced this problem? Would appreciate any thoughts or ideas we could get. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server
Thanks a lot : it works perfectly! Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:10 PM Subject: RE: several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server Make sure the second domain new.com has MX records pointing to your Exchange 2000 server, and then create a recipient policy in Exchange System Manager for new.com. This new recipient policy should be configured to give your users the new.com SMTP address. Make sure you create a new recipient policy and don't modify the default one. Neil -Original Message- From: SERAFINI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 January 2002 16:35 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server Subject: several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server I have exchange 2K installed with 2 DNS servers all included in Active Directory + NT2K SP2 + EXCH-SP1 Ther is only one Domain working : abc.net and email are of the type [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to install other domains like new.com to have other mail adresses of the type [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do I have to do actually? : add the domain area in A.D.as a primary and secondary area and a SMTP container in the Single Exchange Server 2000? Could You explain exactly the steps to install this? Thanks a lot in advance Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: /3GB switch
Andrew, Check the links below for some more info on the /3GB switch. It is intended for W2K Advanced Server and W2K Datacenter Server, except for some special circumstances. User mode is still limited to 2 GB when this switch is used on W2K Server. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q291988 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q298064 http://www.microsoft.com/hwdev/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.asp http://www.dell.com/downloads/us/pedge/exchange2000.doc Anthony. -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: /3GB switch imho, the /3GB switch causes problems on standard Win2000 servers. Someone sent me a MS doc talking about why you wouldn't want to run this switch on a production box - I could probably find it if anyone is interested. /3Gb seems to be much happier on Win2000 Advanced server though, it actually does something. Has anyone persuaded any version of Windows to use more than 3.1Gb of memory? Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 5:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: /3GB switch Hey all, I have a simple question: Does anyone know if running without the '/3GB' switch in the boot.ini on an Exchange 2000 server with 2GB of RAM could cause message delivery problems? The Virtual memory error is showing up every hour in the event log. The Server is E2k SP1, with about 800 users. We had a few issues with messages that got delayed in sending out to the internet, it looks like they were getting stuck in the SMTP connector. Thanks for any help! Andrew K Sharicz List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly
really? Pat "Ray Zorz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" et> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: 01/11/2002 07:23 Subject: RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly PM Please respond to "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" Versions and event messages would be helpful. -Original Message- From: Sonny Meza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: Michael Hoelscher; Dan Reed; John Moreland; Bill Brown Subject: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly We've had problems with our Exchange store dismounting unexpectedly. This happens quite often - sometimes two or three times a week. We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. Other than that, we have nothing else running on that server. Has anyone experienced this problem? Would appreciate any thoughts or ideas we could get. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
