RE: Compact Exch 5.5 DB
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q192185; I think this document might lead you to the figures you need, again it will depend on the performance of your machine. Given the size of your database it could be tricky. Rgds Dominic. -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 07:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compact Exch 5.5 DB try the KB or technet. or better yet Andrews ultra KB. http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=Inventory.TXT Matt - Original Message - From: Rose, Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:13 PM Subject: RE: Compact Exch 5.5 DB Do you know where I could get some official Doco? -Original Message- From: Anshu Dhamija [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 3:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compact Exch 5.5 DB It may take a whole day. regards anshu -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Compact Exch 5.5 DB Hi, Has anybody got a rough estimate on how long it would take to compact an 88gb Priv on a PentiumIII 800 rgds, Adge This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs. ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Compact Exch 5.5 DB
Dependencies also include: Read write performance of your drives. Location of temp database (it rewrites the store to a temp location). Amount of white space within your database (Event ID 1221 is like a worst case scenario) William -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Compact Exch 5.5 DB Hi, Has anybody got a rough estimate on how long it would take to compact an 88gb Priv on a PentiumIII 800 rgds, Adge This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Compact Exch 5.5 DB
Thanks for your input everyone:) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 4:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compact Exch 5.5 DB Dependencies also include: Read write performance of your drives. Location of temp database (it rewrites the store to a temp location). Amount of white space within your database (Event ID 1221 is like a worst case scenario) William -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Compact Exch 5.5 DB Hi, Has anybody got a rough estimate on how long it would take to compact an 88gb Priv on a PentiumIII 800 rgds, Adge This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List
Title: Message I wrote a small script to do this. It can either export your existing turf list to a text file, or import a text file in. Also, Siegfried has written one here: http://www.cdolive.net/download/exchange2000messagefilterlist.zip But mine uses less lines of code.. :-) (only joking, Siegfried) Neil -Original Message-From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 22 July 2002 20:51Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: E2K: Importing Filtered Message ListSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List OK, here is what I want to do: I have a long list of email addresses that I want to block (filter)from being received by Exchange Server 2000 SP1. Exchange calls this "Filtering Message Delivery". In the Exchange System Manager | Global Settings | Message Delivery | Properties | Filtering tab, one can manually enter addresses one-at-a-time that one wants to block. I would rather not retype a hundred addresses using this process. I am looking for a process or tool that will allow me to enter (import) the list of addresses I want to block from a file (like a CSV or Excel file) into E2K so that I don't have to do the manual typing. Hope this clears things up. Best Regards,JMUJim Underwood -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 14:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List can you try again in very plain English? no clue what you are trying to do. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List
Title: Message Siegfried does not have good internet access this week. I was waiting for the Snookster to chime in. :o) Was your script done in Perl, VBScript, or ?? -Original Message-From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List I wrote a small script to do this. It can either export your existing turf list to a text file, or import a text file in. Also, Siegfried has written one here: http://www.cdolive.net/download/exchange2000messagefilterlist.zip But mine uses less lines of code.. :-) (only joking, Siegfried) Neil -Original Message-From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 22 July 2002 20:51Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: E2K: Importing Filtered Message ListSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List OK, here is what I want to do: I have a long list of email addresses that I want to block (filter)from being received by Exchange Server 2000 SP1. Exchange calls this "Filtering Message Delivery". In the Exchange System Manager | Global Settings | Message Delivery | Properties | Filtering tab, one can manually enter addresses one-at-a-time that one wants to block. I would rather not retype a hundred addresses using this process. I am looking for a process or tool that will allow me to enter (import) the list of addresses I want to block from a file (like a CSV or Excel file) into E2K so that I don't have to do the manual typing. Hope this clears things up. Best Regards,JMUJim Underwood -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 14:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List can you try again in very plain English? no clue what you are trying to do. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List
Title: Message VBScript. I used to do a bit of VB/Access coding years ago, so I'm resurrecting my code brain - the possibilites are endless when you get into it! Neil -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 09:40Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: E2K: Importing Filtered Message ListSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List Siegfried does not have good internet access this week. I was waiting for the Snookster to chime in. :o) Was your script done in Perl, VBScript, or ?? -Original Message-From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List I wrote a small script to do this. It can either export your existing turf list to a text file, or import a text file in. Also, Siegfried has written one here: http://www.cdolive.net/download/exchange2000messagefilterlist.zip But mine uses less lines of code.. :-) (only joking, Siegfried) Neil -Original Message-From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 22 July 2002 20:51Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: E2K: Importing Filtered Message ListSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List OK, here is what I want to do: I have a long list of email addresses that I want to block (filter)from being received by Exchange Server 2000 SP1. Exchange calls this "Filtering Message Delivery". In the Exchange System Manager | Global Settings | Message Delivery | Properties | Filtering tab, one can manually enter addresses one-at-a-time that one wants to block. I would rather not retype a hundred addresses using this process. I am looking for a process or tool that will allow me to enter (import) the list of addresses I want to block from a file (like a CSV or Excel file) into E2K so that I don't have to do the manual typing. Hope this clears things up. Best Regards,JMUJim Underwood -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 14:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List can you try again in very plain English? no clue what you are trying to do. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
Public Folder Replication between sites.
Exchange 5.5. Can I replicate Public Folders between two different domains with a one way trust, or would there need to be a two way trust enabled? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Public Folder Replication
In regards to replicating Public folders between two different domains, is this possible, even with a trust (one-way or two-way)? We have two domains, using Exchange 5.5, that we would like to consolidate to one Domain. Any suggestions for the best solution? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder Replication between sites.
Trusts are irrelevant, like when you have X.400 Connectors between the sites. Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: Public Folder Replication between sites. Exchange 5.5. Can I replicate Public Folders between two different domains with a one way trust, or would there need to be a two way trust enabled? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder Replication between sites.
These are completely two different domains though, with different Organization Names and Site names. Is there a best practice for moving data from an Exchange Server in Domain 2 to a completely separate Exchange Server in Domain one? Can it be done? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. Trusts are irrelevant, like when you have X.400 Connectors between the sites. Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: Public Folder Replication between sites. Exchange 5.5. Can I replicate Public Folders between two different domains with a one way trust, or would there need to be a two way trust enabled? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder Replication between sites.
You didn't mention different Orgs in your original post! That will require something like the Interorg tool, of which I am not an expert. :-( Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:50 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. These are completely two different domains though, with different Organization Names and Site names. Is there a best practice for moving data from an Exchange Server in Domain 2 to a completely separate Exchange Server in Domain one? Can it be done? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. Trusts are irrelevant, like when you have X.400 Connectors between the sites. Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: Public Folder Replication between sites. Exchange 5.5. Can I replicate Public Folders between two different domains with a one way trust, or would there need to be a two way trust enabled? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder Replication between sites.
Sorry about that sir! Has anybody used this Interorg Tool with success? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. You didn't mention different Orgs in your original post! That will require something like the Interorg tool, of which I am not an expert. :-( Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:50 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. These are completely two different domains though, with different Organization Names and Site names. Is there a best practice for moving data from an Exchange Server in Domain 2 to a completely separate Exchange Server in Domain one? Can it be done? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. Trusts are irrelevant, like when you have X.400 Connectors between the sites. Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: Public Folder Replication between sites. Exchange 5.5. Can I replicate Public Folders between two different domains with a one way trust, or would there need to be a two way trust enabled? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder Replication between sites.
If you want to *move* the server in it's entirety then the Move Server wizard. If you are talking about *replicating* data then InterOrg or MSMail. Kevin -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 13:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. These are completely two different domains though, with different Organization Names and Site names. Is there a best practice for moving data from an Exchange Server in Domain 2 to a completely separate Exchange Server in Domain one? Can it be done? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. Trusts are irrelevant, like when you have X.400 Connectors between the sites. Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: Public Folder Replication between sites. Exchange 5.5. Can I replicate Public Folders between two different domains with a one way trust, or would there need to be a two way trust enabled? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: I need feedback
Title: Message Do you remember the 1986movie "Short Circuit"? "#5 is alive, need input, more input." etc Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: I need feedback What's a Christian girl like yourself doing talking about more than 1 input? "Abercrombie, Sherry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:273544@exchangelist... Or would that beinput #5? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: I need feedback Please.. Anyone here ever use Max Compression's Compression server for thier exchange serversList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: I need feedback
Title: Message "Not disassemble!" -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 14:06To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Do you remember the 1986movie "Short Circuit"? "#5 is alive, need input, more input." etc Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: I need feedback What's a Christian girl like yourself doing talking about more than 1 input? "Abercrombie, Sherry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:273544@exchangelist... Or would that beinput #5? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: I need feedback Please.. Anyone here ever use Max Compression's Compression server for thier exchange serversList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend & Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: I need feedback
Title: Message Thanks Les, I'm glad someone remembers that movie :) Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback "Not disassemble!" -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 14:06To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Do you remember the 1986movie "Short Circuit"? "#5 is alive, need input, more input." etc Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: I need feedback What's a Christian girl like yourself doing talking about more than 1 input? "Abercrombie, Sherry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:273544@exchangelist... Or would that beinput #5? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: I need feedback Please.. Anyone here ever use Max Compression's Compression server for thier exchange serversList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. Theservice is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactiveanti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:http://www.star.net.ukList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: I need feedback
Title: Message 1986...mmm let me see.. I was bustin my butt in the armed forces.. no wonder I don't remember it.. B -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 23 July 2002 15:29To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Thanks Les, I'm glad someone remembers that movie :) Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback "Not disassemble!" -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 14:06To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Do you remember the 1986movie "Short Circuit"? "#5 is alive, need input, more input." etc Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: I need feedback What's a Christian girl like yourself doing talking about more than 1 input? "Abercrombie, Sherry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:273544@exchangelist... Or would that beinput #5? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: I need feedback Please.. Anyone here ever use Max Compression's Compression server for thier exchange serversList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. Theservice is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactiveanti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:http://www.star.net.ukList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: I need feedback
Title: Message LOL I was 7 years old, and yes I remember it. Number 5 is alive! -Original Message-From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback 1986...mmm let me see.. I was bustin my butt in the armed forces.. no wonder I don't remember it.. B -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 23 July 2002 15:29To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Thanks Les, I'm glad someone remembers that movie :) Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback "Not disassemble!" -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 14:06To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Do you remember the 1986movie "Short Circuit"? "#5 is alive, need input, more input." etc Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: I need feedback What's a Christian girl like yourself doing talking about more than 1 input? "Abercrombie, Sherry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:273544@exchangelist... Or would that beinput #5? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: I need feedback Please.. Anyone here ever use Max Compression's Compression server for thier exchange serversList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. Theservice is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactiveanti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:http://www.star.net.ukList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: I need feedback
Title: Message I seem to recall mucking around with VAX/VMS and Dbase III in those days... Neil -Original Message-From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 14:32Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: I need feedbackSubject: RE: I need feedback 1986...mmm let me see.. I was bustin my butt in the armed forces.. no wonder I don't remember it.. B -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 23 July 2002 15:29To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Thanks Les, I'm glad someone remembers that movie :) Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback "Not disassemble!" -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 14:06To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback Do you remember the 1986movie "Short Circuit"? "#5 is alive, need input, more input." etc Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: I need feedback What's a Christian girl like yourself doing talking about more than 1 input? "Abercrombie, Sherry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:273544@exchangelist... Or would that beinput #5? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: I need feedback Please.. Anyone here ever use Max Compression's Compression server for thier exchange serversList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. Theservice is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactiveanti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:http://www.star.net.ukList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email
RE: Public Folder Replication between sites.
InterOrg it is. Thanks gentlemen. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. If you want to *move* the server in it's entirety then the Move Server wizard. If you are talking about *replicating* data then InterOrg or MSMail. Kevin -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 13:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. These are completely two different domains though, with different Organization Names and Site names. Is there a best practice for moving data from an Exchange Server in Domain 2 to a completely separate Exchange Server in Domain one? Can it be done? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication between sites. Trusts are irrelevant, like when you have X.400 Connectors between the sites. Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 July 2002 13:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Public Folder Replication between sites. Subject: Public Folder Replication between sites. Exchange 5.5. Can I replicate Public Folders between two different domains with a one way trust, or would there need to be a two way trust enabled? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange behind PIX config
I have modified addresses to protect the innocent. I would be happy to take this topic off line: I have an Exchange 2000 server sitting behind a PIX 515. I want Internet e-mail bound for the Exchange server to pass through the PIX to the Exchange server. I have contacacted the ISP to have them change the MX record to 192.10.10.195. These are the lines I have added to the config: global (outside) 1 192.10.10.196-192.10.10.198 static (inside,outside) 192.10.10.196 10.16.0.2 access-list smtp_in permit tcp any host 192.10.10.196 eq smtp access-group smtp_in in interface outside no fixup protocol smtp 25 The Exchange 2000 Server is 10.16.0.2 , the Outside interface of the PIX is 192.10.10.195 Thanks for the help Chris Bodnar List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder Replication
Define better... 2 NT Domains, or 2 Exchange Organizations? We have a multi-domain, single Organization 5.5 setup here, so that is eminently possible (Service Account resides in a fully trusted, dedicated domain.) Not too sure about different Orgs, though. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 05:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public Folder Replication In regards to replicating Public folders between two different domains, is this possible, even with a trust (one-way or two-way)? We have two domains, using Exchange 5.5, that we would like to consolidate to one Domain. Any suggestions for the best solution? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange behind PIX config
Well your problem is with the static line You have the outside IP for the exchange server set to 192.10.10.196 You want to change the 196 to 195 because thats what your DNS record is pointing to. Or change your DNS record to point to 196. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange behind PIX config I have modified addresses to protect the innocent. I would be happy to take this topic off line: I have an Exchange 2000 server sitting behind a PIX 515. I want Internet e-mail bound for the Exchange server to pass through the PIX to the Exchange server. I have contacacted the ISP to have them change the MX record to 192.10.10.195. These are the lines I have added to the config: global (outside) 1 192.10.10.196-192.10.10.198 static (inside,outside) 192.10.10.196 10.16.0.2 access-list smtp_in permit tcp any host 192.10.10.196 eq smtp access-group smtp_in in interface outside no fixup protocol smtp 25 The Exchange 2000 Server is 10.16.0.2 , the Outside interface of the PIX is 192.10.10.195 Thanks for the help Chris Bodnar List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Outlook Exchange Server
This has probably been asked before but did not see it. Can Ms Outlook 2000 be configured to access to Exchange Servers from different domains with both accounts setup as Exchange Server? Thanks Garry Whitson Microcomputer Support Specialist Lincoln Land Community College [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Exchange Server
Profiles. -Original Message-From: Garry Whitson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 09:04To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Exchange Server This has probably been asked before but did not see it. Can Ms Outlook 2000 be configured to access to Exchange Servers from different domains with both accounts setup as Exchange Server? Thanks Garry Whitson Microcomputer Support Specialist Lincoln Land Community College [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MDBDATA Folder and Transaction logs
Ello Everyone, I seem to have a minor annoyance here and I was wondering if anyone could shed a little light on it for me. I understand that the MDBDATA folder keeps transaction logs and it is necessary for a rebuild. However, occasionally when I move mailboxes from the 5.5 server to the E2K server, the MDBDATA folder fills up and causes the mailbox store to dismount. I can go in delete the test files in the MDBDATA folder and remount the store with out any problem. Like I said, more than an annoyance than anything else. Although I have noticed, that this folder never seems to fill up and it usually only has a few megs of info in it. I just dont understand why it fills up and crashes the mounted mailbox store sometimes, and not others. Can anyone explain it to me? Thanks Garland Mac Neill Systems Administrator Solbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
What an issue!
I have a question/issue. Our legal dept. would like "read receipts" for all e-mails sent out, once they have been read by the recipient. This message originates from a web server and is sent with a program like "Sendmail" to virtually to every employee here. We have set up a mailbox within the Exchange org which is where they would like the read receipts to return to. They have a script they are using on the app server (see below) that supposedly is set up to send a read receipt but apparently it does not function. I didn't write it and I don't know much about it. It does send a delivery receipt however.In the CDO message object there is a return-receipt-to value to which can be assigned an e-mail address; and this, as far as I understand, should cause read receipt functionality to occur. However, when the web server sends off the message to the recipient, we get back a "delivery successful" notification (which I don't even really want), but then no subsequent "read receipt", even after the message has been opened and closed.I checked the Internet headers for the message (see bottom of message), and the Return-Receipt-To header is part of the message, but it seems to be acting like a delivery notification instead. 1) Am I incorrect on which header should cause the read receipt functionality to work? Or 2) Do I just have the wrong code? Or am I beating a dead horse? I was wondering if thereis a correlation in Exchange/Outlook for which Internet Header "maps" to the read receipt flag in the Outlook client (like it seems the Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Header "maps" to the Delivery Receipt Requested checkbox in an Outlook message). I did find an article on MSDN that might have something to do with this, assuming I am correct in #1 above. It is: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q253917 If you could help me out on this, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, David Kopec Electronic Messaging Specialist Technology Services Solutions Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Headers (By looking at View==Options on message sent from Appdev webserver): Received: from appdev (appdev.mfs.com [168.66.12.121]) by carina.mfs.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 3YSNZY5A; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: dkopec @mfs.com To: dkopec @mfs.com Subject: Test Email--Please Open Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Message-ID: 006201c22cdd$7b005890$[EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890" X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Thread-Index: AcIs3XsAXZwcwr+eQeWVlnFS6dSgng== Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890--
RE: Exchange behind PIX config
Thanks for the reply. The Global command is where I am getting confused. It was my understanding that I need it, and it couldn't be the IP address of the Outside interface. Is that correct? If it can be would this work: global (outside) 1 192.10.10.195 static (inside,outside) 192.10.10.195 10.16.0.2 access-list smtp_in permit tcp any host 192.10.10.195 eq smtp access-group smtp_in in interface outside no fixup protocol smtp 25 Thanks chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: What an issue!
Title: Message You will never get this working to their satisfaction. RR is a client based action and many email clients simply don't support it, or will allow the reader of said message to decline the receipt. As an example, I always decline them. -Original Message-From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: What an issue! I have a question/issue. Our legal dept. would like "read receipts" for all e-mails sent out, once they have been read by the recipient. This message originates from a web server and is sent with a program like "Sendmail" to virtually to every employee here. We have set up a mailbox within the Exchange org which is where they would like the read receipts to return to. They have a script they are using on the app server (see below) that supposedly is set up to send a read receipt but apparently it does not function. I didn't write it and I don't know much about it. It does send a delivery receipt however.In the CDO message object there is a return-receipt-to value to which can be assigned an e-mail address; and this, as far as I understand, should cause read receipt functionality to occur. However, when the web server sends off the message to the recipient, we get back a "delivery successful" notification (which I don't even really want), but then no subsequent "read receipt", even after the message has been opened and closed.I checked the Internet headers for the message (see bottom of message), and the Return-Receipt-To header is part of the message, but it seems to be acting like a delivery notification instead. 1) Am I incorrect on which header should cause the read receipt functionality to work? Or 2) Do I just have the wrong code? Or am I beating a dead horse? I was wondering if thereis a correlation in Exchange/Outlook for which Internet Header "maps" to the read receipt flag in the Outlook client (like it seems the Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Header "maps" to the Delivery Receipt Requested checkbox in an Outlook message). I did find an article on MSDN that might have something to do with this, assuming I am correct in #1 above. It is: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q253917 If you could help me out on this, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, David Kopec Electronic Messaging Specialist Technology Services Solutions Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Headers (By looking at View==Options on message sent from Appdev webserver): Received: from appdev (appdev.mfs.com [168.66.12.121]) by carina.mfs.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 3YSNZY5A; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: dkopec @mfs.com To: dkopec @mfs.com Subject: Test Email--Please Open Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Message-ID: 006201c22cdd$7b005890$[EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890" X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Thread-Index: AcIs3XsAXZwcwr+eQeWVlnFS6dSgng== Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890--
RE: What an issue!
Attorneys are great. A laugh a minute. It won't work anyway. 1. It doesn't always work. 2. Outlook 2002 and many, many other mail clients can throw them in the trash. 3. www.grinningshark.com People have been known to reply with several hundred read receipts. Sorry I couldn't help you. But I feel your pain, trust me. -Original Message- From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: What an issue! I have a question/issue. Our legal dept. would like read receipts for all e-mails sent out, once they have been read by the recipient. This message originates from a web server and is sent with a program like Sendmail to virtually to every employee here. We have set up a mailbox within the Exchange org which is where they would like the read receipts to return to. They have a script they are using on the app server (see below) that supposedly is set up to send a read receipt but apparently it does not function. I didn't write it and I don't know much about it. It does send a delivery receipt however. In the CDO message object there is a return-receipt-to value to which can be assigned an e-mail address; and this, as far as I understand, should cause read receipt functionality to occur. However, when the web server sends off the message to the recipient, we get back a delivery successful notification (which I don't even really want), but then no subsequent read receipt, even after the message has been opened and closed. I checked the Internet headers for the message (see bottom of message), and the Return-Receipt-To header is part of the message, but it seems to be acting like a delivery notification instead. 1) Am I incorrect on which header should cause the read receipt functionality to work? Or 2) Do I just have the wrong code? Or am I beating a dead horse? I was wondering if thereis a correlation in Exchange/Outlook for which Internet Header maps to the read receipt flag in the Outlook client (like it seems the Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Header maps to the Delivery Receipt Requested checkbox in an Outlook message). I did find an article on MSDN that might have something to do with this, assuming I am correct in #1 above. It is: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q253917 If you could help me out on this, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, David Kopec Electronic Messaging Specialist Technology Services Solutions Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Headers (By looking at View==Options on message sent from Appdev webserver): Received: from appdev (appdev.mfs.com [168.66.12.121]) by carina.mfs.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 3YSNZY5A; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: dkopec @mfs.com To: dkopec @mfs.com Subject: Test Email--Please Open Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Message-ID: 006201c22cdd$7b005890$[EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Thread-Index: AcIs3XsAXZwcwr+eQeWVlnFS6dSgng== Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890-- List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
IIS Metabase Issues
I rebooted our MS Exchange 2000 server too regain memory due to the memory leaks. Upon restart the MS Exchange and IIS and SMTP and WEB services would not start. I receive event errors 7001 and when trying to manually start these services we get general messages and access denied. This never occurred before upon a reboot and we haven't changed anything. MS states that the Metabase is corrupted an referred the Q article of Q304166. The first step is to remove and reinstall the Internet Information Service. This was attempted however the WWW service which was selected did not install. I reapplied SP2 and tried again. I am wondering if there is another underlying issue that is being overlooked. Please advise JR List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 2000 server trying to contact decommissioned 5.5 server
Hello All, I have recently installed a Exchange 2000 server and migrated all of the mailboxes, contacts, public folders over to this server from an Exchange 5.5 server. The 5.5 server has since been removed from the site organization and formatted for other usage. All has been well, I haven't had any issues with clients connecting or mail flow but I do get the following error within the event logs: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 164, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name NTSERVER [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) It seems as if the E2K server is trying to communicate with the removed e55 server. I followed all of the KB articles when I removed the e55 server so I am unsure why it is still trying to communicate with it. The closest articles i see to this issue has something to do with the e55 service account. The site has been converted to native mode so the tab that allows me to change the service account pswd isn't there any more. One thing I do notice is in the Public\System folders. In the System manager, Under Offline address book, I notice there are two entries. One is: /o=Playknits/cn=addrlists/cn=oabs/cn=Default Offline Address List the other is: EX:/o=Playknits/ou=PLAYKNITS Are there supposed to be two entries in this? The other thing I noticed was under the Events Root System Folder, there is an item called EventConfig_NTSERVER. NTSERVER was the name of the E55 server which has been decomissioned. Should I delete this entry. Any help with this issue would be greatly appreciated. I keep getting the error messages every 10 minutes. â²Ð¡j»^©Ý¶m§ÿðà .·¥¶Ê ·«yÊýì\ ©àzX¬µÈZ®×«Ù
FW: Exchange behind PIX config
No, the Global line is for NAT, the config you had previously would be correct but you would exclude the IP you set a static mapping from from the Global config. If you use a Global IP for a static mapping the config gets more complicated because within the Global command you would provide the ports. global (outside) 1 192.10.10.197-192.10.10.198 static (inside,outside) 192.10.10.196 10.16.0.2 access-list smtp_in permit tcp any host 192.10.10.196 eq smtp access-group smtp_in in interface outside no fixup protocol smtp 25 You would probably be better off using Conduits to do the port forwarding instead of the ACL's. -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 7/23/2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: Subject: RE: Exchange behind PIX config Thanks for the reply. The Global command is where I am getting confused. It was my understanding that I need it, and it couldn't be the IP address of the Outside interface. Is that correct? If it can be would this work: global (outside) 1 192.10.10.195 static (inside,outside) 192.10.10.195 10.16.0.2 access-list smtp_in permit tcp any host 192.10.10.195 eq smtp access-group smtp_in in interface outside no fixup protocol smtp 25 Thanks chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm .+- «µêÚÑ@A«a¶Úÿ 0²éÛz[l¡ûpj·¢oÞÅÈZ¥Ë\ ªíz¸m
Re: =====Instant messenger and archiveing
Whats NDA ? !!! - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:22 AM Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing You're not under NDA, eh? That's a pretty sweet deal. Microsoft makes everyone else sign one. -Original Message- From: Will Schmied [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing I recommend IMLog, check out http://msexchange.org/pages/articles.asp?art=585. You can get their contact information and some other information on the product for that article. As a note...this technology will be built into the next version of Exchange. _| |_ _| Will Schmied|_ _| BSET, MCSE, MCSA, Network+, A+ |_ _| http://www.netserverworld.com |_ _| http://www.soitslikethat.com|_ | | -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: =Instant messenger and archiveing Hi all Im using microsoft exchange server 2000 and Instant messageing service The company I work for want to archive messages that are send and recived from users , I didn`t find any option there , how can I do this ? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: =====Instant messenger and archiveing
Never Dine with Andy -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: =Instant messenger and archiveing Whats NDA ? !!! - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:22 AM Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing You're not under NDA, eh? That's a pretty sweet deal. Microsoft makes everyone else sign one. -Original Message- From: Will Schmied [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing I recommend IMLog, check out http://msexchange.org/pages/articles.asp?art=585. You can get their contact information and some other information on the product for that article. As a note...this technology will be built into the next version of Exchange. _| |_ _| Will Schmied|_ _| BSET, MCSE, MCSA, Network+, A+ |_ _| http://www.netserverworld.com |_ _| http://www.soitslikethat.com|_ | | -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: =Instant messenger and archiveing Hi all Im using microsoft exchange server 2000 and Instant messageing service The company I work for want to archive messages that are send and recived from users , I didn`t find any option there , how can I do this ? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: =====Instant messenger and archiveing
I can attest to that. NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement For the acronym impaired. [1] http://www.acronymfinder.com/ [1] Hi Missy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing Never Dine with Andy -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: =Instant messenger and archiveing Whats NDA ? !!! - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:22 AM Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing You're not under NDA, eh? That's a pretty sweet deal. Microsoft makes everyone else sign one. -Original Message- From: Will Schmied [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing I recommend IMLog, check out http://msexchange.org/pages/articles.asp?art=585. You can get their contact information and some other information on the product for that article. As a note...this technology will be built into the next version of Exchange. _| |_ _| Will Schmied|_ _| BSET, MCSE, MCSA, Network+, A+ |_ _| http://www.netserverworld.com |_ _| http://www.soitslikethat.com|_ | | -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: =Instant messenger and archiveing Hi all Im using microsoft exchange server 2000 and Instant messageing service The company I work for want to archive messages that are send and recived from users , I didn`t find any option there , how can I do this ? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: =====Instant messenger and archiveing
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exactAcronym=NDA -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 14:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: =Instant messenger and archiveing Whats NDA ? !!! - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:22 AM Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing You're not under NDA, eh? That's a pretty sweet deal. Microsoft makes everyone else sign one. -Original Message- From: Will Schmied [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: =Instant messenger and archiveing I recommend IMLog, check out http://msexchange.org/pages/articles.asp?art=585. You can get their contact information and some other information on the product for that article. As a note...this technology will be built into the next version of Exchange. _| |_ _| Will Schmied|_ _| BSET, MCSE, MCSA, Network+, A+ |_ _| http://www.netserverworld.com |_ _| http://www.soitslikethat.com|_ | | -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: =Instant messenger and archiveing Hi all Im using microsoft exchange server 2000 and Instant messageing service The company I work for want to archive messages that are send and recived from users , I didn`t find any option there , how can I do this ? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Exchange Server
Title: Message Yes. I have that setup in 2 profiles. One using a dialup to one Exchange and one using any connection to another Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Garry Whitson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:04To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Exchange Server This has probably been asked before but did not see it. Can Ms Outlook 2000 be configured to access to Exchange Servers from different domains with both accounts setup as Exchange Server? Thanks Garry Whitson Microcomputer Support Specialist Lincoln Land Community College [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange behind PIX config
You would probably be better off using Conduits to do the port forwarding instead of the ACL's. Not in version 6.x you wouldn't. Conduit statements were for 5.x and lower... -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: FW: Exchange behind PIX config No, the Global line is for NAT, the config you had previously would be correct but you would exclude the IP you set a static mapping from from the Global config. If you use a Global IP for a static mapping the config gets more complicated because within the Global command you would provide the ports. global (outside) 1 192.10.10.197-192.10.10.198 static (inside,outside) 192.10.10.196 10.16.0.2 access-list smtp_in permit tcp any host 192.10.10.196 eq smtp access-group smtp_in in interface outside no fixup protocol smtp 25 You would probably be better off using Conduits to do the port forwarding instead of the ACL's. -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 7/23/2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: Subject: RE: Exchange behind PIX config Thanks for the reply. The Global command is where I am getting confused. It was my understanding that I need it, and it couldn't be the IP address of the Outside interface. Is that correct? If it can be would this work: global (outside) 1 192.10.10.195 static (inside,outside) 192.10.10.195 10.16.0.2 access-list smtp_in permit tcp any host 192.10.10.195 eq smtp access-group smtp_in in interface outside no fixup protocol smtp 25 Thanks chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm .+- @A䳫aⰰ 0z[lpjoZ \ࠅzm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribution List
Is there an easy way to determine which users have been configured to have their inbound mail copied to a distribution list. In the past I added a distribution list to the alternate recipient field in Exchange Admin and I'd like to quickly determine the users I have configured this way. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank You, William R. Stehley Network Manager Delta Dental of Pennsylvania 717-766-8500x3112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: IIS Metabase Issues
I rebooted our MS Exchange 2000 server too regain memory due to the memory leaks. Memory leaks? Are you sure? You do know Exchange using all available memory if it needs it, right? Sure beats wasting it. I receive event errors 7001 What is the full text of these errors? The first step is to remove and reinstall the Internet Information Service. Or just reinstall. Not remove. Rename the metabase.bin file and reinstall IIS. When that is successful, you reapply the latest Windows2000 service pack. When that is successful, you use the reinstall option and reinstall Exchange2000. When that is successful you reapply the latest Exchange 2000 service pack. A different path than is outlined in Q304166 and Q290290 can result in restoring from backup. I am wondering if there is another underlying issue that is being overlooked. Could be. Like improper shutdown procedure or A/V scanning of the metabase.bin file. How often do you reboot? The answer shoud probably be something like... Only for service packs. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: IIS Metabase Issues I rebooted our MS Exchange 2000 server too regain memory due to the memory leaks. Upon restart the MS Exchange and IIS and SMTP and WEB services would not start. I receive event errors 7001 and when trying to manually start these services we get general messages and access denied. This never occurred before upon a reboot and we haven't changed anything. MS states that the Metabase is corrupted an referred the Q article of Q304166. The first step is to remove and reinstall the Internet Information Service. This was attempted however the WWW service which was selected did not install. I reapplied SP2 and tried again. I am wondering if there is another underlying issue that is being overlooked. Please advise JR List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List
You could create a csv header file containing alt-recipient as one of the headers, export the directory and sort on the alt-recipient column. I prefer ldp.exe (w2k resource kit). The ldap filter would look something like this: alt-recipient=cn=(alternaterecipientalias),cn=Recipients,ou=site,o=org -Original Message- From: William Stehley DDPPA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribution List Is there an easy way to determine which users have been configured to have their inbound mail copied to a distribution list. In the past I added a distribution list to the alternate recipient field in Exchange Admin and I'd like to quickly determine the users I have configured this way. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank You, William R. Stehley Network Manager Delta Dental of Pennsylvania 717-766-8500x3112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MDBDATA Folder and Transaction logs
Title: Message Move mailbox creates transaction logs. The bigger the mailbox to move, the greater the transaction logs. Is the partition holding this instnace of te MDBDATA folder sufficiently sized? -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MDBDATA Folder and Transaction logs Ello Everyone, I seem to have a minor annoyance here and I was wondering if anyone could shed a little light on it for me. I understand that the MDBDATA folder keeps transaction logs and it is necessary for a rebuild. However, occasionally when I move mailboxes from the 5.5 server to the E2K server, the MDBDATA folder fills up and causes the mailbox store to dismount. I can go in delete the test files in the MDBDATA folder and remount the store with out any problem. Like I said, more than an annoyance than anything else. Although I have noticed, that this folder never seems to fill up and it usually only has a few megs of info in it. I just dont understand why it fills up and crashes the mounted mailbox store sometimes, and not others. Can anyone explain it to me? Thanks Garland Mac Neill Systems Administrator Solbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
FW: Exchange 2000 server trying to contact decommissioned 5.5 server
Looks like I solved the issue. I removed the entry under the Events Root system folder (EventConfig_NTSERVER) but 10 minutes later the error reappear. I then restarted the MTA Stacks service and I have been monitoring the logs since, so far no errors. I will keep monitoring the logs to see if it reappaears, hopefully it wont. Thanks anyway! -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong Sent: Tue 7/23/2002 1:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Exchange 2000 server trying to contact decommissioned 5.5 server Hello All, I have recently installed a Exchange 2000 server and migrated all of the mailboxes, contacts, public folders over to this server from an Exchange 5.5 server. The 5.5 server has since been removed from the site organization and formatted for other usage. All has been well, I haven't had any issues with clients connecting or mail flow but I do get the following error within the event logs: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 164, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name NTSERVER [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) It seems as if the E2K server is trying to communicate with the removed e55 server. I followed all of the KB articles when I removed the e55 server so I am unsure why it is still trying to communicate with it. The closest articles i see to this issue has something to do with the e55 service account. The site has been converted to native mode so the tab that allows me to change the service account pswd isn't there any more. One thing I do notice is in the Public\System folders. In the System manager, Under Offline address book, I notice there are two entries. One is: /o=Playknits/cn=addrlists/cn=oabs/cn=Default Offline Address List the other is: EX:/o=Playknits/ou=PLAYKNITS Are there supposed to be two entries in this? The other thing I noticed was under the Events Root System Folder, there is an item called EventConfig_NTSERVER. NTSERVER was the name of the E55 server which has been decomissioned. Should I delete this entry. Any help with this issue would be greatly appreciated. I keep getting the error messages every 10 minutes. â²Ð¡j»^©Ý¶m§ÿðà .·¥¶Ê ·«yÊýì\ ©àzX¬µÈZ®×«Ù
RE: What an issue!
Title: Message Read receipts are a warm fuzzy client-side feature that just doesn't work. They do not belong in a corporate setting, in my opinion. False positives generated by the preview pane, short messages read in the preview pane and deleted prior to the preview pane changing message status to 'read', client side responses to not send a read receipt as capable in Outlook2002, and if you are talking for external use, well then it is a total crap shoot and even a successfully returned 'read receipt' holds little or no legal value. Because I'm too cheap for Watch Your Back, I use this one for my Outlook2000 clients: http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm Read receipts are just more crap on my servers. -Original Message-From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: What an issue! I have a question/issue. Our legal dept. would like "read receipts" for all e-mails sent out, once they have been read by the recipient. This message originates from a web server and is sent with a program like "Sendmail" to virtually to every employee here. We have set up a mailbox within the Exchange org which is where they would like the read receipts to return to. They have a script they are using on the app server (see below) that supposedly is set up to send a read receipt but apparently it does not function. I didn't write it and I don't know much about it. It does send a delivery receipt however.In the CDO message object there is a return-receipt-to value to which can be assigned an e-mail address; and this, as far as I understand, should cause read receipt functionality to occur. However, when the web server sends off the message to the recipient, we get back a "delivery successful" notification (which I don't even really want), but then no subsequent "read receipt", even after the message has been opened and closed.I checked the Internet headers for the message (see bottom of message), and the Return-Receipt-To header is part of the message, but it seems to be acting like a delivery notification instead. 1) Am I incorrect on which header should cause the read receipt functionality to work? Or 2) Do I just have the wrong code? Or am I beating a dead horse? I was wondering if thereis a correlation in Exchange/Outlook for which Internet Header "maps" to the read receipt flag in the Outlook client (like it seems the Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Header "maps" to the Delivery Receipt Requested checkbox in an Outlook message). I did find an article on MSDN that might have something to do with this, assuming I am correct in #1 above. It is: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q253917 If you could help me out on this, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, David Kopec Electronic Messaging Specialist Technology Services Solutions Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Headers (By looking at View==Options on message sent from Appdev webserver): Received: from appdev (appdev.mfs.com [168.66.12.121]) by carina.mfs.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 3YSNZY5A; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: dkopec @mfs.com To: dkopec @mfs.com Subject: Test Email--Please Open Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Message-ID: 006201c22cdd$7b005890$[EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890" X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Thread-Index: AcIs3XsAXZwcwr+eQeWVlnFS6dSgng== Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0063_01C22CBB.F3EEB890--
RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List
Pretty spiffy, n00b. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 01:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List You could create a csv header file containing alt-recipient as one of the headers, export the directory and sort on the alt-recipient column. I prefer ldp.exe (w2k resource kit). The ldap filter would look something like this: alt-recipient=cn=(alternaterecipientalias),cn=Recipients,ou=site,o=org -Original Message- From: William Stehley DDPPA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribution List Is there an easy way to determine which users have been configured to have their inbound mail copied to a distribution list. In the past I added a distribution list to the alternate recipient field in Exchange Admin and I'd like to quickly determine the users I have configured this way. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank You, William R. Stehley Network Manager Delta Dental of Pennsylvania 717-766-8500x3112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List
Isn't lpd useless if he'd on NT4 without LDAP enabled? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 01:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List You could create a csv header file containing alt-recipient as one of the headers, export the directory and sort on the alt-recipient column. I prefer ldp.exe (w2k resource kit). The ldap filter would look something like this: alt-recipient=cn=(alternaterecipientalias),cn=Recipients,ou=site,o=org -Original Message- From: William Stehley DDPPA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribution List Is there an easy way to determine which users have been configured to have their inbound mail copied to a distribution list. In the past I added a distribution list to the alternate recipient field in Exchange Admin and I'd like to quickly determine the users I have configured this way. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank You, William R. Stehley Network Manager Delta Dental of Pennsylvania 717-766-8500x3112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List
LPD is only useless if you don't have a printer. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List Isn't lpd useless if he'd on NT4 without LDAP enabled? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 01:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List You could create a csv header file containing alt-recipient as one of the headers, export the directory and sort on the alt-recipient column. I prefer ldp.exe (w2k resource kit). The ldap filter would look something like this: alt-recipient=cn=(alternaterecipientalias),cn=Recipients,ou=site,o=org -Original Message- From: William Stehley DDPPA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribution List Is there an easy way to determine which users have been configured to have their inbound mail copied to a distribution list. In the past I added a distribution list to the alternate recipient field in Exchange Admin and I'd like to quickly determine the users I have configured this way. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank You, William R. Stehley Network Manager Delta Dental of Pennsylvania 717-766-8500x3112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List
g -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List LPD is only useless if you don't have a printer. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List Isn't lpd useless if he'd on NT4 without LDAP enabled? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 01:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribu tion List You could create a csv header file containing alt-recipient as one of the headers, export the directory and sort on the alt-recipient column. I prefer ldp.exe (w2k resource kit). The ldap filter would look something like this: alt-recipient=cn=(alternaterecipientalias),cn=Recipients,ou=site,o=org -Original Message- From: William Stehley DDPPA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Determine Recipients who have their mail copied to a Distribution List Is there an easy way to determine which users have been configured to have their inbound mail copied to a distribution list. In the past I added a distribution list to the alternate recipient field in Exchange Admin and I'd like to quickly determine the users I have configured this way. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank You, William R. Stehley Network Manager Delta Dental of Pennsylvania 717-766-8500x3112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Flagged Items Not do not Bring Up Reminder
I've got one user who when she flags an email, does not get a reminder to follow up. The individual who receives the flagged item does get a reminder. I've used the repair option but she still does not get the reminder. My last hope is uninstall/reinstall. Before I do that, have I missed something as to activating this feature? MMF (:--) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Organizing Exchange Address Lists
Hello All, I have been working with a Exchange2k server which i recently migrated users from an Exchange 5.5 server. When the items were on the E55 server, there were several recipient containers that held only contacts (IE: microsoft container would hold all microsoft email contacts, etc). Before I installed the E2K server I created an AD OU called Contacts and under that OU I created OU for each company. The look within the AD Users Computers console looks similiar to how the containers looked under the Exchange 5.5 admin. The only issue now is that when you goto the address book, there are just the usual Global Address list, All Address Lists, All Contacts, etc. The OU's that I created to take the place of the E55 containers are represent in the address book. Is there a way that I can sort this out and have the contacts for each company that is contained within each OU properly represent within the Address Book. If not, would I have to create a sort of address book view, if so how is that done. I just experimented with creating an address list within the E2K sys manager but it doesn't do query based on OU, I can only do it via company name or custom attribute (just checked contacts dont have custom attributes). If that is the only route, I would have to edit all the contacts and add the company name to represent the OU that took the place of the E55 containers. Hope this makes sense, cause I know I would be confused. Any help would be appreciated. ËB ªíz¶§tPjØm¶ÿà ,ºvÞÛ(~Üç(÷±r§éb²×!j»^®f
Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 26163
Server Info: Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6a Cluster (microsoft) Multi server organization. All replications replicate to every other server but to and from this one. The error I get is Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 26163 Also states to call Microsoft. I read in other news groups Ms didn't help much. If anyone has ran into this before and has a resolve I would appreciated. This was all caused when 3 of the hdds in the raid5 shared scsi array died. (3 out of 5). So I had to restore from tape. HELP. Email flows fine to and from this server. It has around 500 mailboxes on it. Stopping and restarting service or server didn't help. The site where this happened stopped doing back ups.. I have no other dir.edb file to restore.. Is there a way to repair the adamage done? Thanks Shawn List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 261 63
What all did you restore from tape? Did you just restore the priv.edb and pub.edb or did you also restore the dir.edb? Have you consulted the MS Disaster Recovery Whitepapers? Following the methods they have outlined has not led me astray yet. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp Ben Winzenz Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Adams, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 26163 Server Info: Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6a Cluster (microsoft) Multi server organization. All replications replicate to every other server but to and from this one. The error I get is Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 26163 Also states to call Microsoft. I read in other news groups Ms didn't help much. If anyone has ran into this before and has a resolve I would appreciated. This was all caused when 3 of the hdds in the raid5 shared scsi array died. (3 out of 5). So I had to restore from tape. HELP. Email flows fine to and from this server. It has around 500 mailboxes on it. Stopping and restarting service or server didn't help. The site where this happened stopped doing back ups.. I have no other dir.edb file to restore.. Is there a way to repair the adamage done? Thanks Shawn List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Organizing Exchange Address Lists
You create separate address lists using Exchange System Manager as you said. Yes, they arent based on OU. The LDAP filters are still more granular than what you were doing in 5.5. An Address List requirement is also something that would be planned prior to migration, because access can be controlled with perms and policies. See: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q319213 www.swynk.com/friends/mbell/Exch2000-8-1.asp William -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Organizing Exchange Address Lists Hello All, I have been working with a Exchange2k server which i recently migrated users from an Exchange 5.5 server. When the items were on the E55 server, there were several recipient containers that held only contacts (IE: microsoft container would hold all microsoft email contacts, etc). Before I installed the E2K server I created an AD OU called Contacts and under that OU I created OU for each company. The look within the AD Users Computers console looks similiar to how the containers looked under the Exchange 5.5 admin. The only issue now is that when you goto the address book, there are just the usual Global Address list, All Address Lists, All Contacts, etc. The OU's that I created to take the place of the E55 containers are represent in the address book. Is there a way that I can sort this out and have the contacts for each company that is contained within each OU properly represent within the Address Book. If not, would I have to create a sort of address book view, if so how is that done. I just experimented with creating an address list within the E2K sys manager but it doesn't do query based on OU, I can only do it via company name or custom attribute (just checked contacts dont have custom attributes). If that is the only route, I would have to edit all the contacts and add the company name to represent the OU that took the place of the E55 containers. Hope this makes sense, cause I know I would be confused. Any help would be appreciated. .+ A z[ jo ˅z List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Flagged Items Not do not Bring Up Reminder
The repair option being to open outlook with the switch /cleanreminders? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q197180 William -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Flagged Items Not do not Bring Up Reminder I've got one user who when she flags an email, does not get a reminder to follow up. The individual who receives the flagged item does get a reminder. I've used the repair option but she still does not get the reminder. My last hope is uninstall/reinstall. Before I do that, have I missed something as to activating this feature? MMF (:--) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS
Title: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS I have a friend who is having a problem with his Exchange 5.5, SP2 server. The admin left and someone deleted his account instead of just disabling it and/or changing the password. Now only administrators can see the GAL. I think the problem is that the search permission is set, but when he goes into the administrator program to change it, he gets this error: You do not have the permissions required to complete this operation. DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS He's logged on as the Exchange service account admin and everything else is working except access to the GAL - can't see it can't resolve names. Any ideas on how to fix this? I've been looking on Google and MS and haven't really come up with anything. Also, I don't know if this makes any difference, but the Exchange server is also a BDC. TIA, MJ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS
Title: Message Service Account Admin? Is he logged using the Exchange Service Account? Plase don't say the admin account that was deleted was the servica account. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS I have a friend who is having a problem with his Exchange 5.5, SP2 server. The admin left and someone deleted his account instead of just disabling it and/or changing the password. Now only administrators can see the GAL. I think the problem is that the "search" permission is set, but when he goes into the administrator program to change it, he gets this error: You do not have the permissions required to complete this operation. DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS He's logged on as the Exchange service account admin and everything else is working except access to the GAL - can't see it can't resolve names. Any ideas on how to fix this? I've been looking on Google and MS and haven't really come up with anything. Also, I don't know if this makes any difference, but the Exchange server is also a BDC. TIA, MJ List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 2000 - Enterprise
I cant seem to find any upgrade paths from std server to enterprise. Don't tell me we have to start all over with pricing? Ugh, and the dreaded new S.A. schema heh List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 2000 - Enterprise
You mean run setup? I don't follow the pricing side very much. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 - Enterprise I cant seem to find any upgrade paths from std server to enterprise. Don't tell me we have to start all over with pricing? Ugh, and the dreaded new S.A. schema heh List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 2000 - Enterprise
No, I meant the pricing. Apparently I can run the enterprise edition right over the top. This is a single site single org, that just needs more space, so wasn't worried about that. But now I have to get another 6k for the version and toss out the old version. Oh well.. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 7:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 - Enterprise You mean run setup? I don't follow the pricing side very much. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 - Enterprise I cant seem to find any upgrade paths from std server to enterprise. Don't tell me we have to start all over with pricing? Ugh, and the dreaded new S.A. schema heh List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Default recipient????
I cannot for the life of me remember how to set an Exchange 5.5 server to accept mail addressed to the domain with misspellings in the username. I am trying to get the postmaster mailbox to accept miss-addressed messages, for rerouting. Tried google and MS KB, but I seem to have lost my touch on phrasing searches today. All I seem to get are links to keep from being an open relay...anyone got a Q# or any other pointer for me to continue my search? I swear I used to do this, but I may be confusing myself with Unix sendmail Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Default recipient????
In the IMS Properties you can enter a mailbox (or DL, or public folder address) and assign that as a destination for copies of NDR's. You can manually forward to intended recipients from there. There is no postmaster assigned by default. William -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Default recipient I cannot for the life of me remember how to set an Exchange 5.5 server to accept mail addressed to the domain with misspellings in the username. I am trying to get the postmaster mailbox to accept miss-addressed messages, for rerouting. Tried google and MS KB, but I seem to have lost my touch on phrasing searches today. All I seem to get are links to keep from being an open relay...anyone got a Q# or any other pointer for me to continue my search? I swear I used to do this, but I may be confusing myself with Unix sendmail Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Default recipient????
William, I created a mailbox as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was trying to get the messages to go there. I guess it must be send mail I was thinking of with a default or *@domain.com. I am trying to work out a nice way to deal with users who are not happy that their friends can't spell their names and don't use address books... I haven't done this in a long time, and it may have been before my exchange days...but sending copies of the NDRs to the Admin mailbox will work as well I suppose. It may have been using a send mailbox between Exchange and the Internet to forward anything not in the alias list to the postmaster mailbox on Exchange. Thanks for your suggestion, Not exactly what I wanted, but it will do. Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Default recipient In the IMS Properties you can enter a mailbox (or DL, or public folder address) and assign that as a destination for copies of NDR's. You can manually forward to intended recipients from there. There is no postmaster assigned by default. William -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Default recipient I cannot for the life of me remember how to set an Exchange 5.5 server to accept mail addressed to the domain with misspellings in the username. I am trying to get the postmaster mailbox to accept miss-addressed messages, for rerouting. Tried google and MS KB, but I seem to have lost my touch on phrasing searches today. All I seem to get are links to keep from being an open relay...anyone got a Q# or any other pointer for me to continue my search? I swear I used to do this, but I may be confusing myself with Unix sendmail Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 2000 coexisting with Groupwise 6
Hello, I've set up the Groupwise API gateway for Groupwise version 6 and the MS Novel Groupwise connector for Exchange 2000. After playing with it for a little bit, I've gotten them to exchange directory information, but I haven't gotten them to successfully route messages between the two systems. They both return NDR's with out much helpful information. On the Exchange 2000 side of things, the bounce message is being returned by the Groupwise connector, and the ID of the recipient is correct, but the messages just are making it across the connector. The purpose of this is to give us the time needed to do a migration. We will not be able to do a quick migration...so we will need the co-existance. Also, each system is using the same SMTP domain name. Thanks for the help. Garrett Thompson CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CNE, CCA Maximation, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Default recipient????
Their friends will still receive the NDR's as well for misspelled names indicating unknown recipient, but so will the postmaster. You do not need a separate mailbox necessarily. You can use any valid SMTP address in your org. There is no catch-all functionality in Exchange. William -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 7:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Default recipient William, I created a mailbox as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was trying to get the messages to go there. I guess it must be send mail I was thinking of with a default or *@domain.com. I am trying to work out a nice way to deal with users who are not happy that their friends can't spell their names and don't use address books... I haven't done this in a long time, and it may have been before my exchange days...but sending copies of the NDRs to the Admin mailbox will work as well I suppose. It may have been using a send mailbox between Exchange and the Internet to forward anything not in the alias list to the postmaster mailbox on Exchange. Thanks for your suggestion, Not exactly what I wanted, but it will do. Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Default recipient In the IMS Properties you can enter a mailbox (or DL, or public folder address) and assign that as a destination for copies of NDR's. You can manually forward to intended recipients from there. There is no postmaster assigned by default. William -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Default recipient I cannot for the life of me remember how to set an Exchange 5.5 server to accept mail addressed to the domain with misspellings in the username. I am trying to get the postmaster mailbox to accept miss-addressed messages, for rerouting. Tried google and MS KB, but I seem to have lost my touch on phrasing searches today. All I seem to get are links to keep from being an open relay...anyone got a Q# or any other pointer for me to continue my search? I swear I used to do this, but I may be confusing myself with Unix sendmail Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 2000 coexisting with Groupwise 6
What do the NDRs say from the Exchange side? Are these both in the same SMTP domain? -Original Message- From: Garrett Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 coexisting with Groupwise 6 Hello, I've set up the Groupwise API gateway for Groupwise version 6 and the MS Novel Groupwise connector for Exchange 2000. After playing with it for a little bit, I've gotten them to exchange directory information, but I haven't gotten them to successfully route messages between the two systems. They both return NDR's with out much helpful information. On the Exchange 2000 side of things, the bounce message is being returned by the Groupwise connector, and the ID of the recipient is correct, but the messages just are making it across the connector. The purpose of this is to give us the time needed to do a migration. We will not be able to do a quick migration...so we will need the co-existance. Also, each system is using the same SMTP domain name. Thanks for the help. Garrett Thompson CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CNE, CCA Maximation, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
FW: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS
Title: Message -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:39 PMTo: 'William Lefkovics 'Subject: RE: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS Exchange 5.5 SP2?? Why so old of a service pack? Why not SP4? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: 7/23/2002 5:55 PM Subject: RE: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS Service Account Admin? Is he logged using the Exchange Service Account? Plase don't say the admin account that was deleted was the servica account. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS I have a friend who is having a problem with his Exchange 5.5, SP2 server. The admin left and someone deleted his account instead of just disabling it and/or changing the password. Now only administrators can see the GAL. I think the problem is that the "search" permission is set, but when he goes into the administrator program to change it, he gets this error: You do not have the permissions required to complete this operation. DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS He's logged on as the Exchange service account admin and everything else is working except access to the GAL - can't see it can't resolve names. Any ideas on how to fix this? I've been looking on Google and MS and haven't really come up with anything. Also, I don't know if this makes any difference, but the Exchange server is also a BDC. TIA, MJ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
