RE: More questions on associate account to exch2k3
Not sure I understand the question. They log in as themselves. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: More questions on associate account to exch2k3 I want to associate account of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a trusted domain to a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox in the original domain. After disabling userA and adjusting mailbox rights for userB how userB accesses OWA ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changing Servers
Thanks for the answers, everyone. Sounds like this will be slightly less painful. Can't say I'm looking forward to it, still! -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changing Servers As I mentioned in a previous post, I'm getting a new server this summer to replace our existing Exchange server. We're currently running Exchange 2003 on a Server 2003 machine. I'm going to be moving us to an Exchange 2007 server running on Server 2008. So, how to I direct all of my users (Outlook 2003 and 2007) to the new server? Is there a quick/painless method? John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changing Servers
Slam dunk! We got your back. M -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing Servers Thanks for the answers, everyone. Sounds like this will be slightly less painful. Can't say I'm looking forward to it, still! -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changing Servers As I mentioned in a previous post, I'm getting a new server this summer to replace our existing Exchange server. We're currently running Exchange 2003 on a Server 2003 machine. I'm going to be moving us to an Exchange 2007 server running on Server 2008. So, how to I direct all of my users (Outlook 2003 and 2007) to the new server? Is there a quick/painless method? John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
R: More questions on associate account to exch2k3
Thanks. But I read also about to a hotfix (kb 909737) that should be applied GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: giovedì 15 maggio 2008 14.48 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: More questions on associate account to exch2k3 Not sure I understand the question. They log in as themselves. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: More questions on associate account to exch2k3 I want to associate account of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a trusted domain to a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox in the original domain. After disabling userA and adjusting mailbox rights for userB how userB accesses OWA ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt
It got rid of the prompts for our OWA users, internally and externally. I had to add their intermediary certificate for my Active-Sync users but even that's working well now. I suggest a two-year cert so you don't have the issue every 12 months. Roger -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt And with the recognized certificate, the prompt will not appear? Or will it be replaced by a The site certificate is right yadda yadda ? I´d rather have no messages or prompts that could confuse the user... Thanks for the link. - Original Message - From: Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:17 AM Subject: RE: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt Spend the $25-30 for a recognized certificate: www.certificatesforexchange.com Roger Wright -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 7:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt Hello, Having configured OWA to use https, configured its publication in the ISA Server and etc, one problem still persists : When users connect to the site, even in the internal network, IE complains that the user has not chosen to trust in the site specified in the certificate. I have tried adding the certificate in the Certificates configuration of IE, but it didn´t work It´s not that the site will not work, but it is another thing that needs to be explained to users, and that someone is bound to click No in the message... The certificate is internally created in the win2k3 server. How could I make the message disappear ( GPO ou direct IE configuration, it´s just 20 machines, we can walk to them ). Thanks. Silvio. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
R: More questions on associate account to exch2k3
Sorry the Kb was 916783 related to msExchMasterAccountSid GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: giovedì 15 maggio 2008 16.50 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: R: More questions on associate account to exch2k3 Thanks. But I read also about to a hotfix (kb 909737) that should be applied GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: giovedì 15 maggio 2008 14.48 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: More questions on associate account to exch2k3 Not sure I understand the question. They log in as themselves. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: More questions on associate account to exch2k3 I want to associate account of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a trusted domain to a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox in the original domain. After disabling userA and adjusting mailbox rights for userB how userB accesses OWA ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Adding new email address to 200 users
What is your update interval in RUS set to? We found that if the update interval was set to always run, it would not update existing accounts. However, if the update interval was set to 15 minutes, it would update existing accounts. James Winzenz Infrastructure Engineer - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:56 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: Adding new email address to 200 users Subject: RE: Adding new email address to 200 users It actually will modify existing users, but it's not instantaneous. Make sure your filters are correct and try this doc: http://www.msexchange.org/articles/Troubleshooting-Exchange-Recipient-Up date-Service-RUS.html Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980 You rely on Exchange. We keep it running. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 5:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Adding new email address to 200 users Kevan, I think the recipient policy will apply to new users but will not modify existing users. Lynne From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 May 2008 12:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Adding new email address to 200 users Hi Thank you for your replies. I have looked up Recipient Policies and read all about them and tried to apply a new policy to a couple of test users in a test OU. I found the users via the LDAP query tool and correctly identified them. In the policy I left the original address unchanged and added the new one as an SMTP address so I have 2 SMTP addresses in this policy. However I am still not seeing the new address being added to these users when I view them in Active Directory Users and computers. At the moment under Recipient policies I am seeing 3 policies. 2 of them are the same apart from the LDAP Query. They are Default with the priority at lowest and Checkmate with priority highest which both seem to have been created when exchange was first installed and my new policy that has a priority of 1. Any ideas why my addresses might not be updating? Regards Kevan From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 May 2008 18:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Adding new email address to 200 users Kevan, Lookup Recipient Policies in Exchange 2003. What you're looking to do can be accomplished in there. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/249299 _ John Bowles - Original Message From: Kevan Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:01:38 PM Subject: Adding new email address to 200 users Hi We have recently merged with another company and are being requested to accept email at the new company name. What is the easiest way to alias the the new address to our current mailboxes? We are using exchange 2003 SP2 and windows Server 2003. Regards. Kevan Dickinson Network Manager CMi plc 23 Hanborough Business Park, Long Hanborough, Oxfordshire. OX29 8SG. Direct Tel: +(44)1993 885661 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cmi-plc.com http://www.cmi-plc.com/ ***Disclaimer*** The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, CMi plc and its subsidiaries are unable to guarantee the security of Email content outside of our own computer systems. This footnote also confirms that this Email message has been checked by MailMarshal for the presence of computer viruses. Whilst we run anti-virus software, you are solely responsible for ensuring that any Email or attachment you receive is virus free. We disclaim any liability for any damage you suffer as a consequence of receiving any virus. Checkmate International plc (CMi) Registered in England No: 1899857 Registered Office 4th Floor, 35 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6BW ** Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62 sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20 ***Disclaimer*** The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
Message Tracking
This may not be for this group but I thought i would throw it out there anyway. Is there a way to track a pdf document after it's sent out by exchange (outside your organization) so people that it's not meant for cannot see it or if they can see it we could some how be notified? I am looking for options besides passwords on the doc. thanks in advance. David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Message Tracking
Rights Management Services are the closest thing; but it requires you to establish a PKI and federate it with remote organizations that you want to be able to see the documents. In my personal opinion - it's all moot. If somebody wants to copy something, they can take a screen print. Or use their phone camera. Whatever. Once it's out, it's gone. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Message Tracking This may not be for this group but I thought i would throw it out there anyway. Is there a way to track a pdf document after it's sent out by exchange (outside your organization) so people that it's not meant for cannot see it or if they can see it we could some how be notified? I am looking for options besides passwords on the doc. thanks in advance. David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Message Tracking
My rule of thumb is never email anything that you don't want to see on the front page of the local newspaper. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message Tracking Rights Management Services are the closest thing; but it requires you to establish a PKI and federate it with remote organizations that you want to be able to see the documents. In my personal opinion - it's all moot. If somebody wants to copy something, they can take a screen print. Or use their phone camera. Whatever. Once it's out, it's gone. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Message Tracking This may not be for this group but I thought i would throw it out there anyway. Is there a way to track a pdf document after it's sent out by exchange (outside your organization) so people that it's not meant for cannot see it or if they can see it we could some how be notified? I am looking for options besides passwords on the doc. thanks in advance. David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Do you still need archiving in 2007?
Hi we have Exchange 2003 and Enterprise Vault 6. About 700 mailboxes. Our EV is installed on a backup server and due to increasing capacity issues needs to be moved, and upgraded to 2007. It has been suggested that if we upgrade to Exhange 2007 and do away with online message archive which will simplify our environment. Reasoning: We implemented EV to archive messages out of the database for DB size and performance, backup time etc. However with Exchange 2007 x64, the DB size issue goes away, we would still have quotes :-), X64 performance is much better and the much quicker backups under Exch2007 are very attractive. Has anyone looked or gone down this path? Is my logic flawed? Cheers Michael ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Do you still need archiving in 2007?
It sounds like only you can really answer that question. If you don't have any regulatory compliance issues to consider in regards to e-mail retention, than you can probably get by without an archiving solution. Sounds like you might be starting a bit of a battle with your end-users though. If you plan on using quotas with no means of archiving, is their only option to delete messages? If they have don't have to worry about storage limitations now because you are using Enterprise Vault, I'd be willing to bet your users won't want to give that up. -Sean On 5/15/08, Michael Pears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi we have Exchange 2003 and Enterprise Vault 6. About 700 mailboxes. Our EV is installed on a backup server and due to increasing capacity issues needs to be moved, and upgraded to 2007. It has been suggested that if we upgrade to Exhange 2007 and do away with online message archive which will simplify our environment. Reasoning: We implemented EV to archive messages out of the database for DB size and performance, backup time etc. However with Exchange 2007 x64, the DB size issue goes away, we would still have quotes :-), X64 performance is much better and the much quicker backups under Exch2007 are very attractive. Has anyone looked or gone down this path? Is my logic flawed? Cheers Michael ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Do you still need archiving in 2007?
Add HR business process for disputes, etc. If you have delegated read rights to a different department then you will again assume ownership of that drudge work. Steven On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Sean Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sounds like only you can really answer that question. If you don't have any regulatory compliance issues to consider in regards to e-mail retention, than you can probably get by without an archiving solution. Sounds like you might be starting a bit of a battle with your end-users though. If you plan on using quotas with no means of archiving, is their only option to delete messages? If they have don't have to worry about storage limitations now because you are using Enterprise Vault, I'd be willing to bet your users won't want to give that up. -Sean On 5/15/08, Michael Pears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi we have Exchange 2003 and Enterprise Vault 6. About 700 mailboxes. Our EV is installed on a backup server and due to increasing capacity issues needs to be moved, and upgraded to 2007. It has been suggested that if we upgrade to Exhange 2007 and do away with online message archive which will simplify our environment. Reasoning: We implemented EV to archive messages out of the database for DB size and performance, backup time etc. However with Exchange 2007 x64, the DB size issue goes away, we would still have quotes :-), X64 performance is much better and the much quicker backups under Exch2007 are very attractive. Has anyone looked or gone down this path? Is my logic flawed? Cheers Michael ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use
OK. Easy. Remove the Ms-Exch-Send-Headers-Routing allow permission for NT AUTHORITY\Anonymous Logon from the send connector. Done. :-) Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use With the fact that application headers like with Exchange will advertise the internal FQDN, it should be retracted. Because without understanding the requirements of the SMTP specification, many Exchange administrators unknowingly set themselves up to fail by not having a valid response in their HELO. I fear this issue will only increase as anti-spam practices become more specific. On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wouldn't say that it was retracted, but it is not considered best practice anymore; no more than empty forest roots; or the presumption that a domain is a security boundary. http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/4bb9f469-df87-4830-9 6a8-b28ec71bafa91033.mspx?mfr=true The original guidance is still available at a number of 3rd party sites, but not on any Microsoft site, as far as I can find. However, there are plenty of MSFT whitepapers and KB articles that use .local as a forest root suffix. I'll raise it on the next Supportability call with the PG. I don't know if it'll make the cut at this point in the cycle though. In regards to the SBS recommendations, I know just who to talk to. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use I don't that it was ever official Subscribed, or retracted. Michael b., can you bring this up in the MVP forums and see we can have Nino make a blog post, or get someone to make one? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Not very well though, since it has lingered for years - evn to this day. Was the an official retraction? I see .local in my spam filters HELO log all the time. I reject the sessions. On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Somewhere, but we retracted that after a short period of time... ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Wasn't it in early MS guidance for 2000 or perhaps it was 2003, that you use .local? The concept of split DNS was relatively new, if I remember correctly. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Interestingly, I just installed SBS 2003 R2 for a new customer yesterday, and the SBS installation wizard actually suggested .local! I was surprised. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Why .local? On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We looked at a wildcard cert but that wont work as our internal domain is a .local and externally we are a .com. The users connection settings are pre-filled by Outlook 2007. Is this editable in AD so that we are able to change the server FQDN they connect to? From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2008 16:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Another way might be a 'wildcard certificate'. One that handles *.domain.com, www.domain.com, domain.com, mail.domain.com, etc. A little more spendy though... From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Split DNS On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi chaps, I have an Exchange 2007 server here on which we have setup an SSL certificate (in the name of mail.mydomain.com). This works
Re: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt
ok, thanks. - Original Message - From: Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:31 AM Subject: RE: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt It got rid of the prompts for our OWA users, internally and externally. I had to add their intermediary certificate for my Active-Sync users but even that's working well now. I suggest a two-year cert so you don't have the issue every 12 months. Roger -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt And with the recognized certificate, the prompt will not appear? Or will it be replaced by a The site certificate is right yadda yadda ? I´d rather have no messages or prompts that could confuse the user... Thanks for the link. - Original Message - From: Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:17 AM Subject: RE: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt Spend the $25-30 for a recognized certificate: www.certificatesforexchange.com Roger Wright -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 7:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: HTTPS OWA Certificate prompt Hello, Having configured OWA to use https, configured its publication in the ISA Server and etc, one problem still persists : When users connect to the site, even in the internal network, IE complains that the user has not chosen to trust in the site specified in the certificate. I have tried adding the certificate in the Certificates configuration of IE, but it didn´t work It´s not that the site will not work, but it is another thing that needs to be explained to users, and that someone is bound to click No in the message... The certificate is internally created in the win2k3 server. How could I make the message disappear ( GPO ou direct IE configuration, it´s just 20 machines, we can walk to them ). Thanks. Silvio. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: ActiveSync on WM driving me nuts (fwd)
[ resending, as the original apparently never made it ] MBS Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:30:07 -0400 MBS From: Michael B. Smith MBS Did you look on MY blog? We have a winner! What fixed it for me: Tell the default site to listen on all IP addresses. I never would have guessed... Wow. Many thanks! Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
