Active Synch strange behavior
Hi All, we are in a process of migrating from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007. On Exchange 2003 side we have a SSL certificate to access mails from outside and synch mobile phones. On Exchange 2007 side we have only a self signed certificate. Some migrated users can now synchronize the mobile phone although there is no SSL certificate installed on Exchange 2007. Does someone of you know how this is possible ? Thanks Sascha ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: list down?
-Original Message- From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For some reason our list server got listed in spamcop. I run a Lyris server, too. Twice in the past year and a half it's been listed for 24 hours in a UK-based blacklist. The reason has been either the please confirm that you're a human who really does want to subscribe message or the sorry, you aren't a member of the list so you can't post to it message. A couple of the forged addresses being used by spammers are -- surprise, surprise -- spamtrap addresses. So when Lyris does its we don't put you on unless you confirm and we don't let lists be sent to by non-members thing, every once in a while the resulting message goes to a spamtrap address. Examining the message would show that it's not spam (although obviously it's unsolicited). But a couple of the blacklist outfits figure that anything at all that's unsolicited and to a spamtrap address is reason to blacklist. They say that receipt is proof that a list is NOT opt-in, because there's not even an existing person at that address who ever could opt in. Granted, receiving a substantive message to such an address would be proof. But receiving a please confirm message is the opposite. Still, I haven't bothered arguing with the two times it happened to our server, because the blacklist was in the UK, so few of our members were likely to use it. If it starts happening too often, maybe it'll become worth arguing. Don't know if that's what happened here, but it's possible. Michael Trittipo Minnesota State Bar Association [EMAIL PROTECTED] (612) 278-6339 direct dial (612) 333-1183 receptionist ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: list down?
I would say its extremely likely. Thanks for posting your experiences. I'm sure it shed some like on the confusing problem for a lot of people who arent familiar with the way many spam trap-based DNSBLs operate. Spamcop will require multiple reports. But if a spammer decides to hit an address via repeatedly-sent multiple-faked senders (a common tactic), inclusion can be easy to achieve. The problem stems from the truly amazing way some of the upper-echelon spammers operate. They employ tactics that not only tell when a message they try to send is rejected from a particular target, but they will have that same message sent from another host IP with a different sender address, to see if it will get through that way. I occasionally monitor my spam trap, and I see this targeted systematic approach happen more and more. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Mike Trittipo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For some reason our list server got listed in spamcop. I run a Lyris server, too. Twice in the past year and a half it's been listed for 24 hours in a UK-based blacklist. The reason has been either the please confirm that you're a human who really does want to subscribe message or the sorry, you aren't a member of the list so you can't post to it message. A couple of the forged addresses being used by spammers are -- surprise, surprise -- spamtrap addresses. So when Lyris does its we don't put you on unless you confirm and we don't let lists be sent to by non-members thing, every once in a while the resulting message goes to a spamtrap address. Examining the message would show that it's not spam (although obviously it's unsolicited). But a couple of the blacklist outfits figure that anything at all that's unsolicited and to a spamtrap address is reason to blacklist. They say that receipt is proof that a list is NOT opt-in, because there's not even an existing person at that address who ever could opt in. Granted, receiving a substantive message to such an address would be proof. But receiving a please confirm message is the opposite. Still, I haven't bothered arguing with the two times it happened to our server, because the blacklist was in the UK, so few of our members were likely to use it. If it starts happening too often, maybe it'll become worth arguing. Don't know if that's what happened here, but it's possible. Michael Trittipo Minnesota State Bar Association [EMAIL PROTECTED] (612) 278-6339 direct dial (612) 333-1183 receptionist ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
looking for a good book on exchange 2003 to 2007 migration
Looking to upgrade next year and was curious if anyone had any good books with info on this? Chris Drobny Network/Systems Administrator LMS Intellibound, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770.724.0562 Office 404.797.9710 Cell ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: looking for a good book on exchange 2003 to 2007 migration
From: Chris Drobny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: looking for a good book on exchange 2003 to 2007 migration Looking to upgrade next year and was curious if anyone had any good books with info on this? I used the various articles on MSExchange.org. http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Transitioning-Exchange-2000-2003-Exchang e-Server-2007-Part1.html http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Transitioning-Exchange-2000-2003-Exchang e-Server-2007-Part2.html http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Transitioning-Exchange-2000-2003-Exchang e-Server-2007-Part3.html http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/migration- deployment/removing-last-exchange-2003-server-exchange-2007-part1.html http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/migration- deployment/removing-last-exchange-2003-server-exchange-2007-part2.html http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/migration- deployment/removing-last-exchange-2003-server-exchange-2007-part3.html http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/migration- deployment/removing-last-exchange-2003-server-exchange-2007-part4.html http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Removing-First-Exchange-2003-Server-Part 1.html http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Removing-First-Exchange-2003-Server-Part 2.html Webster ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Backup Solutions
Hello - I am re-evaluating my backup options to replace my current tape solution as it is rapidly running out of space. In my situation i am trying to backup 150GB-200GB. Is everyone using tape still or have some made the jump to disk-to-disk? Maybe using an off-site backup like iron mountain? I am curious to here other people's solutions and what their experiences have been or possible recommendations. As always your input is much appreciated. Regards, David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Backup Solutions
Using nothing but 2 TB external USB drives for backup storage. Very inexpensive, easy to grow and reconfigure. Simple script to copy the backups to a remote building once a week. If we didn't have remote buildings I would copy them to an Iron Mountain. From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Backup Solutions Hello - I am re-evaluating my backup options to replace my current tape solution as it is rapidly running out of space. In my situation i am trying to backup 150GB-200GB. Is everyone using tape still or have some made the jump to disk-to-disk? Maybe using an off-site backup like iron mountain? I am curious to here other people's solutions and what their experiences have been or possible recommendations. As always your input is much appreciated. Regards, David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Backup Solutions
We have been selling a bunch of these systems to our clients. Works really well. Onsite and offsite solution. http://www.maxsp.com/ Brian Chase Office: (408) 260-1601 Fax: (408) 260-1611 Do we monitor your network 24/7? Call us for details! To receive Tech Tips Updates Sign up for Our Monthly newsletter at www.intelligentns.com http://www.intelligentns.com/ About Intelligent Network Services We pride ourselves in being a complete business solutions provider for all your computing needs. Our goal is to save our clients money by focusing on preventative maintenance and intelligent network designs. We listen to our client's challenges and offer a range of custom options that fit their specific needs and budgets so they can make the best decisions. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Backup Solutions Using nothing but 2 TB external USB drives for backup storage. Very inexpensive, easy to grow and reconfigure. Simple script to copy the backups to a remote building once a week. If we didn't have remote buildings I would copy them to an Iron Mountain. From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Backup Solutions Hello - I am re-evaluating my backup options to replace my current tape solution as it is rapidly running out of space. In my situation i am trying to backup 150GB-200GB. Is everyone using tape still or have some made the jump to disk-to-disk? Maybe using an off-site backup like iron mountain? I am curious to here other people's solutions and what their experiences have been or possible recommendations. As always your input is much appreciated. Regards, David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.gif
RE: Backup Solutions
We've been talking about disaster recovery (e.g., what if our office burns down) and what we need to do to be sure we have offsite backups. We've considered two options: 1) digital vaulting using a service like Vault Logix and 2) putting a backup device in our colo and backing up to that location. I like Vault Logix because it's a simple install on one central PC and it's agentless. It also supports all the different variety of server OS's we have (Windows, Linux, Solaris). Vault Logix uses the Asigra software package which compresses and encrypts before sending it out. We've also looked at EMC which bought Avamar. Their software is similar to Asigra. EMC bundles it with one of their storage systems for a turnkey solution. Each solution is expensive. Vault Logix charges by the GBs stored. Jon From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Backup Solutions Hello - I am re-evaluating my backup options to replace my current tape solution as it is rapidly running out of space. In my situation i am trying to backup 150GB-200GB. Is everyone using tape still or have some made the jump to disk-to-disk? Maybe using an off-site backup like iron mountain? I am curious to here other people's solutions and what their experiences have been or possible recommendations. As always your input is much appreciated. Regards, David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Backup Solutions
Tivoli in use here, with Disk2Disk2Tape - LTO3 on the back end. However, Exchange is by far not our largest backup, at only about 70gbytes. Our file server at over 2tbytes is the kingpin. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, David Baca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello - I am re-evaluating my backup options to replace my current tape solution as it is rapidly running out of space. In my situation i am trying to backup 150GB-200GB. Is everyone using tape still or have some made the jump to disk-to-disk? Maybe using an off-site backup like iron mountain? I am curious to here other people's solutions and what their experiences have been or possible recommendations. As always your input is much appreciated. Regards, David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded
Has anyone else run in to this issue? Internal external mails are being dropped because we have apparently filled up the Quota for Named Properties or Replica Identifiers for one of our DB’s? The solutions we are finding say to either raise the limits with a reg hack and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers; or move all users to a new DB and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495(EXCHG.80).aspx Does upgrading E2007 to SP1 fix the issue? ,550 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service reported an error. The following information should help identify the cause of this error: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded:16.18969:5E00, And Event Type: Error Event Source:MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date:9/30/2008 Time:2:03:33 PM User:N/A Computer: CCRservername Description: Failed to create a new named property for database SG7\MDB7 because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: hubtransportservername$ Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: x-onestopbaitshop.com-msgid For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Data: : 5b 44 49 41 47 5f 43 54 [DIAG_CT 0008: 58 5d 00 00 6e 00 00 00 X]..n... 0010: ff 14 18 00 00 00 00 00 ÿ... 0018: 00 02 60 00 00 00 3a 67 ..`...:g 0020: f0 1f 56 00 00 00 db 18 ð.V...Û. 0028: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 fd 79 @ýy 0030: 20 10 00 00 00 00 db 18.Û. 0038: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 bd 44 @½D 0040: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0048: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0050: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ad 59.Y 0058: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ed 4c.íL 0060: 20 10 00 00 00 00 fd 45.ýE 0068: 20 10 00 00 00 00 cd 6a.Íj 0070: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0078: 20 10 00 00 00 00 . Larry C. Brown LAN/WAN CS Support Dayton Power Light (937)-331-4922 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.
I've got a user who's mailbox was migrated from 2k3 to 2k7 while his Out of Office was set, and now he can't turn it off. Anyone seen this before? ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.
try running a /cleanrules (after exporting the existing ones). We've had issues where the rules got corrupted after the 07 migration. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Campbell, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a user who's mailbox was migrated from 2k3 to 2k7 while his Out of Office was set, and now he can't turn it off. Anyone seen this before? ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.
What about via OWA or WM6 ? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Campbell, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a user who's mailbox was migrated from 2k3 to 2k7 while his Out of Office was set, and now he can't turn it off. Anyone seen this before? ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.
+1 use owa or make sure you are using a Outlook 2007 client. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration. What about via OWA or WM6 ? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Campbell, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a user who's mailbox was migrated from 2k3 to 2k7 while his Out of Office was set, and now he can't turn it off. Anyone seen this before? ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded
2007 and 2003 have the same default quotas for named props. I recommend the reg hack; we did years ago, as part of our standard build, from 16K to 24K. You’ll want to figure out where all the headers are coming, from too… Onestopbaitshop… nice… looks like you may need to improve your antispam solution to eliminate the issue. From: Brown, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: McCready, Rob Subject: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded Has anyone else run in to this issue? Internal external mails are being dropped because we have apparently filled up the Quota for Named Properties or Replica Identifiers for one of our DB’s? The solutions we are finding say to either raise the limits with a reg hack and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers; or move all users to a new DB and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495(EXCHG.80).aspx Does upgrading E2007 to SP1 fix the issue? ,550 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service reported an error. The following information should help identify the cause of this error: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded:16.18969:5E00, And Event Type: Error Event Source:MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date:9/30/2008 Time:2:03:33 PM User:N/A Computer: CCRservername Description: Failed to create a new named property for database SG7\MDB7 because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: hubtransportservername$ Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: x-onestopbaitshop.com-msgid For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Data: : 5b 44 49 41 47 5f 43 54 [DIAG_CT 0008: 58 5d 00 00 6e 00 00 00 X]..n... 0010: ff 14 18 00 00 00 00 00 ÿ... 0018: 00 02 60 00 00 00 3a 67 ..`...:g 0020: f0 1f 56 00 00 00 db 18 ð.V...Û. 0028: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 fd 79 @ýy 0030: 20 10 00 00 00 00 db 18.Û. 0038: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 bd 44 @½D 0040: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0048: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0050: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ad 59.Y 0058: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ed 4c.íL 0060: 20 10 00 00 00 00 fd 45.ýE 0068: 20 10 00 00 00 00 cd 6a.Íj 0070: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0078: 20 10 00 00 00 00 . Larry C. Brown LAN/WAN CS Support Dayton Power Light (937)-331-4922 This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded
There is a transport sink on codeplex for Exchange Server 2007 which can strip the headers. If you can’t locate it, let me know. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded 2007 and 2003 have the same default quotas for named props. I recommend the reg hack; we did years ago, as part of our standard build, from 16K to 24K. You’ll want to figure out where all the headers are coming, from too… Onestopbaitshop… nice… looks like you may need to improve your antispam solution to eliminate the issue. From: Brown, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: McCready, Rob Subject: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded Has anyone else run in to this issue? Internal external mails are being dropped because we have apparently filled up the Quota for Named Properties or Replica Identifiers for one of our DB’s? The solutions we are finding say to either raise the limits with a reg hack and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers; or move all users to a new DB and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495(EXCHG.80).aspx Does upgrading E2007 to SP1 fix the issue? ,550 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service reported an error. The following information should help identify the cause of this error: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded:16.18969:5E00, And Event Type: Error Event Source:MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date:9/30/2008 Time:2:03:33 PM User:N/A Computer: CCRservername Description: Failed to create a new named property for database SG7\MDB7 because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: hubtransportservername$ Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: x-onestopbaitshop.com-msgid For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Data: : 5b 44 49 41 47 5f 43 54 [DIAG_CT 0008: 58 5d 00 00 6e 00 00 00 X]..n... 0010: ff 14 18 00 00 00 00 00 ÿ... 0018: 00 02 60 00 00 00 3a 67 ..`...:g 0020: f0 1f 56 00 00 00 db 18 ð.V...Û. 0028: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 fd 79 @€ýy 0030: 20 10 00 00 00 00 db 18.Û. 0038: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 bd 44 @€½D 0040: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0048: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0050: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ad 59.Y 0058: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ed 4c.íL 0060: 20 10 00 00 00 00 fd 45.ýE 0068: 20 10 00 00 00 00 cd 6a.Íj 0070: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0078: 20 10 00 00 00 00 . Larry C. Brown LAN/WAN CS Support Dayton Power Light (937)-331-4922 _ This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded
named props are handled better in sp1 than previous versions you can use mfcmapi to dump the named props table and try and see where they are coming from On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a transport sink on codeplex for Exchange Server 2007 which can strip the headers. If you can't locate it, let me know. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded 2007 and 2003 have the same default quotas for named props. I recommend the reg hack; we did years ago, as part of our standard build, from 16K to 24K. You'll want to figure out where all the headers are coming, from too… Onestopbaitshop… nice… looks like you may need to improve your antispam solution to eliminate the issue. From: Brown, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: McCready, Rob Subject: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded Has anyone else run in to this issue? Internal external mails are being dropped because we have apparently filled up the Quota for Named Properties or Replica Identifiers for one of our DB's? The solutions we are finding say to either raise the limits with a reg hack and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers; or move all users to a new DB and figure out what app or domain is sending emails with unique x-headers. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495(EXCHG.80).aspx Does upgrading E2007 to SP1 fix the issue? ,550 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service reported an error. The following information should help identify the cause of this error: MapiExceptionNamedPropsQuotaExceeded:16.18969:5E00, And Event Type: Error Event Source:MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date:9/30/2008 Time:2:03:33 PM User:N/A Computer: CCRservername Description: Failed to create a new named property for database SG7\MDB7 because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: hubtransportservername$ Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: x-onestopbaitshop.com-msgid For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Data: : 5b 44 49 41 47 5f 43 54 [DIAG_CT 0008: 58 5d 00 00 6e 00 00 00 X]..n... 0010: ff 14 18 00 00 00 00 00 ÿ... 0018: 00 02 60 00 00 00 3a 67 ..`...:g 0020: f0 1f 56 00 00 00 db 18 ð.V...Û. 0028: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 fd 79 @€ýy 0030: 20 10 00 00 00 00 db 18.Û. 0038: 40 10 0f 01 04 80 bd 44 @€½D 0040: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0048: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0050: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ad 59.Y 0058: 20 10 00 00 00 00 ed 4c.íL 0060: 20 10 00 00 00 00 fd 45.ýE 0068: 20 10 00 00 00 00 cd 6a.Íj 0070: 20 10 00 00 00 00 03 59..Y 0078: 20 10 00 00 00 00 . Larry C. Brown LAN/WAN CS Support Dayton Power Light (937)-331-4922 This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Upgrade 2000 to 2003 server
Dear All we have a 2000 server box. application installed; 1.main DC 2.Exchange 2000 server we want to upgarde from 2000 to win2003 server. So please guide me how to do upgrade. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003 server
Wow, where to begin... You have two migrations there. AD and Exchange. R U using a new box and moving over to it and retiring the old? Do you have any temporary hardware to get a good online AD server running. How much experience do you have on managing servers in an AD environment? Anyone here will tell you that every migration has it glitches and you must plan and analyze your environment, research potential issues (AV Software, backup software, Exchange Migration research) I doubt you will find anyone that will do a step by step for you without you coming to us with a migration plan and then the group will comment and make suggestions, help you avoid potential pitfalls, and be there as you do the migration itself. Depending on your level of knowledge find a local IT guy with migration experience and have the contract with you to either develop the plan or do it and allow you to be there while they do it. Good luck Greg -Original Message- From: Nirav Doshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Upgrade 2000 to 2003 server Dear All we have a 2000 server box. application installed; 1.main DC 2.Exchange 2000 server we want to upgarde from 2000 to win2003 server. So please guide me how to do upgrade. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
