RE: Retention Policy
Objective The Email Creation Retention Policy requires all users of company email to manage and protect email communications as company records. The intent of this policy implies that most email should be retained for 3 years or less. This requirement includes email on company servers, laptop or desktop hard drives and any other electronic media or peripheral device such as a CD, memory stick or thumb drive. It also includes paper versions. In an effort to measure compliance with this direction, Corporate Compliance has been conducting a monthly analysis of the volume and age of Outlook calendar and email items on company email servers. These items are categorized into: * Items that are 1 -3 years old * Items that are 3 years old As a result of this analysis, Corporate Compliance has initiated an effort to reduce the number of calendar and email items to ensure compliance with email retention requirements. To give you a better understanding of these requirements, here are some highlights from the Email Creation Retention Policy. 1. Email should only be retained on company equipment. 2. Email should be deleted as soon as it is no longer required. 3. Email should be retained based on its content, consistent with the company retention policies. Email should be disposed of when the retention period is complete. 4. If an email does not appear to be covered by a company record retention policy, then the following retention applies. See the Email Creation Retention policy for more examples. * Email in the Sent and Deleted items folders is automatically deleted after 30 days from the date the items were created in the folder. * Email of an informational nature, such as announcements, requiring no follow-up or acknowledgement should be retained no more than 30 days. * Email regarding day-to-day activities should be retained for no more than a year. Many of these emails can be disposed of in less than a year when the activity is completed. This type of email does not establish policy, guidelines, or procedures or certify transaction. * Email having potentially more value should be retained for no more than three (3) years. Examples include general correspondence, monthly and weekly reports, documents advising supervisors of various events, issues or status of ongoing projects. * 5. Destruction or disposal of email must cease when a non-destruction notice is issued by the Law Department. Benefits You may be asking yourself Why should this matter to me? Here are some reasons why this initiative is important: 1. Reduce resources and costs for email storage and backup 2. Enable SOX Compliance 3. Reduce discovery time and risks associated with legal matters 4. Comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by enforcing consistent disposal practices Some records are required to be kept for a certain time period based on legal and governmental requirements. Once the time period is satisfied, the records must be deleted. The basic guideline is that if a record is not needed, delete it! However, a non-destruct order from Legal supersedes the above rules. Jay Reische Enterprise Exchange Administrator Messaging, AD and DNS Phone: 309-748-9422 reische...@johndeere.com From: Mike Tellson [mailto:micha...@colonialsavings.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Retention Policy Management is considering changing what the current email retention policy parameters are.Our current policy is to purge all messages older than X days, but we do not restrict the use of PST files. This policy has encouraged most employees create PST files. This effectively has made the retention policy irrelevant. We are considering importing all PST data into an email archive product (yet to be purchased) and disabling the ability to use PST files. Because so many users do not comply with the existing policy we will probably change the policy to something that the user base is more apt to adhere to. What are your retention policies set to? What is the reason why you chose the settings you have in place?
RE: [M] [MARKETING] RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?
I know, and that's what we've been telling them. But the fact we are going to prevent relaying is a limitation. It doesn't have to be a limitation; the mail submission port can be used (port 587). You relay for authenticated users only. It sounds like there are several disparate organizations so the hurdle will be to figure out where/how the authentication occurs and who is going to take care of the user accounts. If you're not going to provide the feature that would be a great way to justify why you can't (too much cost). More and more ISP's are filtering port 25 on consumer connections so this remote relaying just becomes a larger and larger thing to deal with over time. ~JasonG
RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?
You could limit those allowed to relay to only your internal IP address ranges. Then you would appease your users and not get your email server listed on open relay blacklists. That would still not be the best solution for the reasons others have mentioned, but it would be an easily workable one. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? We haven't had any issue with that so far.. Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.be http://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.be mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] Sent: woensdag 28 april 2010 21:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? Wouldn't that cause you to be tagged on the Internet ? CFee From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is an internal open relay allowed? Hello all, Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email? Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains? The reason I'm asking it is an internal discussion we have here. We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be shut down in a few months. So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system. Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue? Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.be http://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.be mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be image001.gif
RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?
Can't speak for the laws where you are but here there could be legal issues involved. For example we have some pretty strict Public Record laws so we would have to add their personal emails sent with that address to our archival system. I would ask them what business use or educational use this home email thing provides. That is always the final test for us. If it does not server educational needs we are not likely to support it. If their home ISP uses SPF (Sender Permitted From) records then their email might bounce. SPF is an addition to your DNS records that says only these servers are allowed to send email for our domain. Not used a lot but often enough I am surprised you have not had issues with that. But let's change your terminology. You are not (I hope) running an open relay. You are allowing authorized users/IP addresses to send email with any from address they want. That is not an open relay, it is a controlled relay and that is allowable. It can be a good solution for traveling people for example. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is an internal open relay allowed? Hello all, Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email? Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains? The reason I'm asking it is an internal discussion we have here. We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be shut down in a few months. So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system. Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue? Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be inline: image001.gif
RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?
Jim, sorry to disappoint you but internally we do have an open relay. :( All users (students, teachers, staff, ...) are able to send mail It's an old machine that has been setup many years ago, but it still works. Moving from postfix to exchange is easy to explain if you point the users to the extra advantages they are going to experience. However, telling them that sending mails over our internal relay while using their home address is going to be discontinued is not easy to convince them. Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: donderdag 29 april 2010 15:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? Can't speak for the laws where you are but here there could be legal issues involved. For example we have some pretty strict Public Record laws so we would have to add their personal emails sent with that address to our archival system. I would ask them what business use or educational use this home email thing provides. That is always the final test for us. If it does not server educational needs we are not likely to support it. If their home ISP uses SPF (Sender Permitted From) records then their email might bounce. SPF is an addition to your DNS records that says only these servers are allowed to send email for our domain. Not used a lot but often enough I am surprised you have not had issues with that. But let's change your terminology. You are not (I hope) running an open relay. You are allowing authorized users/IP addresses to send email with any from address they want. That is not an open relay, it is a controlled relay and that is allowable. It can be a good solution for traveling people for example. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is an internal open relay allowed? Hello all, Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email? Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains? The reason I'm asking it is an internal discussion we have here. We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be shut down in a few months. So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system. Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue? Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be inline: image001.gif
RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?
Not disappointed at all. You are only allowing internal users to use it. That isn't an open relay by my definition. I would define that as open to anyonelike open to the whole world/internet. What you are doing is very common. Back in the old days before outlook over https we had a bunch of traveling employees that used a specific ISP when on the road. When they were on the road they used that ISP's email server to send our work domain's email, and that ISP was not the one we used at the office. Perfectly acceptable. You don't have an issue with internet 'rules' here at all, you are following them just fine. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? Jim, sorry to disappoint you but internally we do have an open relay. :( All users (students, teachers, staff, ...) are able to send mail It's an old machine that has been setup many years ago, but it still works. Moving from postfix to exchange is easy to explain if you point the users to the extra advantages they are going to experience. However, telling them that sending mails over our internal relay while using their home address is going to be discontinued is not easy to convince them. Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: donderdag 29 april 2010 15:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? Can't speak for the laws where you are but here there could be legal issues involved. For example we have some pretty strict Public Record laws so we would have to add their personal emails sent with that address to our archival system. I would ask them what business use or educational use this home email thing provides. That is always the final test for us. If it does not server educational needs we are not likely to support it. If their home ISP uses SPF (Sender Permitted From) records then their email might bounce. SPF is an addition to your DNS records that says only these servers are allowed to send email for our domain. Not used a lot but often enough I am surprised you have not had issues with that. But let's change your terminology. You are not (I hope) running an open relay. You are allowing authorized users/IP addresses to send email with any from address they want. That is not an open relay, it is a controlled relay and that is allowable. It can be a good solution for traveling people for example. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is an internal open relay allowed? Hello all, Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email? Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains? The reason I'm asking it is an internal discussion we have here. We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be shut down in a few months. So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system. Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue? Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be inline: image001.gif
RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?
I think if you do allow it, it's going to come back and bite you. The domains they're sending from won't have your servers in their SPF records, and more domains are starting to check those for spam filtering. If you haven't yet, I think you're eventually going to run into delivery problems with those relay emails and they're going to want you to fix it. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? Can't speak for the laws where you are but here there could be legal issues involved. For example we have some pretty strict Public Record laws so we would have to add their personal emails sent with that address to our archival system. I would ask them what business use or educational use this home email thing provides. That is always the final test for us. If it does not server educational needs we are not likely to support it. If their home ISP uses SPF (Sender Permitted From) records then their email might bounce. SPF is an addition to your DNS records that says only these servers are allowed to send email for our domain. Not used a lot but often enough I am surprised you have not had issues with that. But let's change your terminology. You are not (I hope) running an open relay. You are allowing authorized users/IP addresses to send email with any from address they want. That is not an open relay, it is a controlled relay and that is allowable. It can be a good solution for traveling people for example. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is an internal open relay allowed? Hello all, Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email? Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains? The reason I'm asking it is an internal discussion we have here. We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be shut down in a few months. So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system. Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue? Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** inline: image001.gif
Re: Webster is now employed
Well done sir. Good luck with the new position. On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 19:05, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote: Webster is now employed by LPS Integration in Nashville, TN as Sr. Citrix Technical Architect. I start Friday May 7th. http://www.lpsintegration.com/ Carl Webster Citrix Technology Professional http://dabcc.com/Webster
RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?
I'm thinking all you need to do is find the best way to explain to them that the world has changed since that was acceptable practice - I don't believe it is acceptable any longer. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? Jim, sorry to disappoint you but internally we do have an open relay. :( All users (students, teachers, staff, ...) are able to send mail It's an old machine that has been setup many years ago, but it still works. Moving from postfix to exchange is easy to explain if you point the users to the extra advantages they are going to experience. However, telling them that sending mails over our internal relay while using their home address is going to be discontinued is not easy to convince them. Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: donderdag 29 april 2010 15:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is an internal open relay allowed? Can't speak for the laws where you are but here there could be legal issues involved. For example we have some pretty strict Public Record laws so we would have to add their personal emails sent with that address to our archival system. I would ask them what business use or educational use this home email thing provides. That is always the final test for us. If it does not server educational needs we are not likely to support it. If their home ISP uses SPF (Sender Permitted From) records then their email might bounce. SPF is an addition to your DNS records that says only these servers are allowed to send email for our domain. Not used a lot but often enough I am surprised you have not had issues with that. But let's change your terminology. You are not (I hope) running an open relay. You are allowing authorized users/IP addresses to send email with any from address they want. That is not an open relay, it is a controlled relay and that is allowable. It can be a good solution for traveling people for example. From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is an internal open relay allowed? Hello all, Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email? Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains? The reason I'm asking it is an internal discussion we have here. We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be shut down in a few months. So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system. Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue? Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be inline: image001.gif
Re: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters
Has anyone had any experience with OutlookSpy, someone suggested that this utility would give the exact portion of an email that has been flagged. Thanks On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Robert Smith exch...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any way to determine which links in an email triggered the anti phishing filters in Outlook? We have had several emails coming in from consultants that have been flagged as suspicious therefore disabling all links. Being that there are multiple links in these emails, it would be nice to know which link(s) are triggering the filter. Thanks, Bob
RE: Spiceworks?
Agreed - we'd just refuse connections from their IP(s) and perhaps nominate them to our DNSBL provider. -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? Any org that continues to send mail after an unsubscribe is spamming. Full stop. I would be interested in header details from these emails. There are ways of getting these type of people's attention. One would hope it's just a mis-configuration and not malice on their part. der are veys ;) ~JasonG -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 20:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? I have a rule made that just deletes all those e-mails from them, permanently. \\Steve// From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? My experience with SW is that I tried it out and didn't really care for it and removed it. I continue to receive emails from them even though I have unsubscribed myself numerous times. IMO Spiceworks = Spammer From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Spiceworks? Hello all... I'm looking at Spiceworks for a pc inventory tool. Can anyone comment on it or make other recommendations? Thanks! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 ConcuityLogoSmall3-29-10 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you.
Re: Is an internal open relay allowed?
There are no rules for email; however, there are agreed upon standards. Spam filters check for violations against those standards, and block or tag where deemed applicable. Spoofing a domain is a standards violation. However, there are mechanisms for dealing with legitimately spoofed domains. This is handled primarily with rDNS and SPF/SenderID. I would recommend you first identify exactly what it is this discussion wants to accomplish. Then, in accordance with your own mail domain documentation, ascertain what is accomplishable with your current configuration, and if mechanisms like SPF or SenderID could help you accomplish those objectives without getting your domain blacklisted. But, by all means, don't rush this. You could very easily incur a large loss of email if you do this improperly. -- ME2 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Vandael Tim tim.vand...@khlim.be wrote: Hello all, Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email? Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains? The reason I’m asking it is an internal discussion we have here. We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be shut down in a few months. So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system. Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue? Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, *KHLim* Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.be/http://www.khlim.be *Tim Vandael* ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.be [image: bar] image001.gif
RE: Spiceworks?
OK, so I set up Spiceworks, and I set up the Helpdesk, I now have a ticket, anyone know how I open the ticket? Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 i...@sonomatilemakers.com -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 8:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? Agreed - we'd just refuse connections from their IP(s) and perhaps nominate them to our DNSBL provider. -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? Any org that continues to send mail after an unsubscribe is spamming. Full stop. I would be interested in header details from these emails. There are ways of getting these type of people's attention. One would hope it's just a mis-configuration and not malice on their part. der are veys ;) ~JasonG -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 20:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? I have a rule made that just deletes all those e-mails from them, permanently. \\Steve// From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? My experience with SW is that I tried it out and didn't really care for it and removed it. I continue to receive emails from them even though I have unsubscribed myself numerous times. IMO Spiceworks = Spammer From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Spiceworks? Hello all... I'm looking at Spiceworks for a pc inventory tool. Can anyone comment on it or make other recommendations? Thanks! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 ConcuityLogoSmall3-29-10 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you.
RE: DAG Creation
You don't touch it. Please make sure that the FSW is in the same AD site as the DAG. If not, you can run into replication delays - which is what this appears to be. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DAG Creation Now when I creat the members of the DAG I get the following error: E2K10 Server Failed Error: The file share witness path '\\SERVERNAME.COMPANY.ORG\DAG01.COMPANY.ORGexists, but its permissions are not set correctly. The account 'DAG01$' needs to have Full Access. How do I give this account the appropriate permissions when I do not see it anywhere in AD? Thankyou, John Bowles From: John Bowles [john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DAG Creation In Henrik's article it only discusses how to create a DAG on the same subnet. How would I setup the DAG when the IP addresses for the replication network are on seperate networks? John Bowles From: John Bowles [john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DAG Creation If I wasn't switching jobs I would be :) John Bowles From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DAG Creation Are you coming to my HA workshop at TEC'2010 in LA next week? :-) I cover this. :-) Henrik Walther has a really good series on setting up DAGs at msexchange.org. He covers all the steps and most of the considerations. Recommended. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DAG Creation All- I'm just a bit confused on the process of setting up a DAG within E2K10. After I create the DAG (DAG1). Once that is created, what is the process of finishing the DAG setup? - Create DAG -Create DAG Network (assign subnet(s) where each member resides) -Assign IP addresses to DAG -Create DB Copy Am I on point with this so far? Are there any other steps that I have left out? Thanks. John Bowles
Re: Meeting appointments in Outlook do not get synchronized on mobile devices
Tell them to pick ONE delegate and only that delegate manages things. The rest are merely there in case that one goes on vacation. There is a KB article on the problems that can occur but the only method we've found is eduction and more education until it sticks. On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Daniele Bartoli danielebart...@gmail.com wrote: We are on Exchange 2003. Anyone found a solution? On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Robert Peterson robert.peter...@prin.edu wrote: I think we have seen this issue too. Occurs with a mailbox with multiple delegates… usually a reoccurring event is changed, an “invitee” sees the change within their Outlook client and OWA, but the change is never seen on their PDA. We are currently on Exchange 2003 Enterprise… hoping Exchange 2010 may clear this issue. What version of Exchange are other’s using that are seeing this problem? Thanks, Robert From: Dan Cooper [mailto:d...@180amsterdam.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 9:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Meeting appointments in Outlook do not get synchronized on mobile devices We have, Multiple Delegates using Outlook, managing multiple Bosses most of whom most are on Entourage! and have a mix of smart phones and Iphones. It's a COMPLETE joy to keep on top of! We have huge issues with entourage Database Corruption, Calendar, contact and Email duplication. Its AWSOME! Keeping the last of my hair for Outlook for mac due this year. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 28 april 2010 15:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Meeting appointments in Outlook do not get synchronized on mobile devices Yes, good point Dave, I concur with you on that. Delegates on calendars can wreck havoc for your users. On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:44 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: We see similar meeting request weirdness, in our case 100% of the time it's exec's who 1) have delegates handle their meetings requests AND 2) use one machine in the office, another laptop to travel with, and at least one smartphone. Most of the time it's recurring appointments, but not always. It seems the other times it's a meetign that is alter modified by somebody. We have 300-ish users, the only ones seeing calednar weirdness are execs and their assistants who manage their meetings, etc. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Meeting appointments in Outlook do not get synchronized on mobile devices What kind of meeting is it? Recurring? There is an issue with recurring appointments on mobile devices, especially iPhones, with recurring appts that have no ending date. Give it an end date of less than 2yrs. But in my experience, appointments and mobile devices don't always sync and generally are flaky. On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Daniele Bartoli danielebart...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone seen this? User Bob goes and creates a meeting request on their desktop in Microsoft Outlook. The recipient receives and accepts the meeting request. The recipient later decides to look for this meeting on their mobile device; it is not there. Further, if the recipient logs onto OWA to review this meeting in question, it is corrupted and can't be viewed. This is a random problem. A first we suspected it was an Apple iPhone issue, however this is also happening with Microsoft mobile devices. Any suggestions? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke DISCLAIMER 4/28/2010 This communication is intended only for use by MS-Exchange Admin Issues. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this communication unintentionally, please inform us immediately. Thank you. 180 has registered companies in the United States and in the Netherlands. 180 Los Angeles LLC . (180) 1424 Second Street, Suite 200 and 300, Santa Monica, California 90401, is registered with the trade register in the US in Delaware under file number 4260284 and the corporation's FEIN is 20-5982098. 180 Amsterdam BV (180) Herengracht 506, 1017 CB, Amsterdam is registered with the trade register in the Netherlands under number 34253037 and VAT number NL8161.54.673.B.01. The content of this communications is not legally binding unless confirmed by letter or telefax. Please note that 180 is neither liable for the proper transmission nor for the complete transmission of the information contained in this communication or for any delay in its receipt. Also please note that the confidentiality of email communication is not warranted. All services and other work provided by 180 are subject to
RE: Spiceworks?
I prefer Spiceworks over Lansweeper for the capability of customizing reports. But I really don't care for their helpdesk. We use Web+ Center by Internet Software Sciences for our helpdesk. It is free for one to two techs. http://www.inet-sciences.com/ From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? So, is there ANY documentation for Spiceworks, or is everything the forums? I cannot figure out how to make a change on the Helpdesk page or even how to open tickets once created. Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 i...@sonomatilemakers.com From: Scott Schneider [mailto:sschnei...@inscapesolutions.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? Spiceworks plays nice with Firefox but is slow on IE. We also had problems with remote scans which has been correctly with the recent updates. From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: April-28-10 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? I've used Spiceworks and mostly liked it, but I seemed to continuously have problems where it wouldn't finish a network scan, especially when it is scanning remote office computers. I also found in the past that the web interface was painfully slow, but that may have improved. Currently I use the free version of Lansweeper, which I like a lot. They just released a new version with a lot of useful looking improvements, but I haven't tried it yet. From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Spiceworks? Hello all... I'm looking at Spiceworks for a pc inventory tool. Can anyone comment on it or make other recommendations? Thanks! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. Confidentiality Notice: ** This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. *This email message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately by reply email or telephone and delete or destroy all copies of the original message image001.jpg
RE: Spiceworks?
Spiceworks does have a nice report builder, but since Lansweeper is SQL based its easy to create custom reports in any number of ways. Also true of Spiceworks with the ODBC driver for SQLite. I may have to give Spiceworks another look because I really want to like it, but 2 years ago I just found it too frustrating with stuck scans, slow response, missing devices and unreliable monitors. From: Dean E. Lahodny [mailto:dlaho...@harrisranch.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? I prefer Spiceworks over Lansweeper for the capability of customizing reports. But I really don't care for their helpdesk. We use Web+ Center by Internet Software Sciences for our helpdesk. It is free for one to two techs. http://www.inet-sciences.com/ From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? So, is there ANY documentation for Spiceworks, or is everything the forums? I cannot figure out how to make a change on the Helpdesk page or even how to open tickets once created. Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 i...@sonomatilemakers.com From: Scott Schneider [mailto:sschnei...@inscapesolutions.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? Spiceworks plays nice with Firefox but is slow on IE. We also had problems with remote scans which has been correctly with the recent updates. From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: April-28-10 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spiceworks? I've used Spiceworks and mostly liked it, but I seemed to continuously have problems where it wouldn't finish a network scan, especially when it is scanning remote office computers. I also found in the past that the web interface was painfully slow, but that may have improved. Currently I use the free version of Lansweeper, which I like a lot. They just released a new version with a lot of useful looking improvements, but I haven't tried it yet. From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Spiceworks? Hello all... I'm looking at Spiceworks for a pc inventory tool. Can anyone comment on it or make other recommendations? Thanks! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. Confidentiality Notice: ** This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. *This email message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If your are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately by reply email or telephone and delete or destroy all copies of the original message. Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. image001.jpg
RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters
I loaded it, but had to remove it. Although it comes highly recommended, it caused me all kinds of grief with Outlook. I have Outlook 2007 running on Windows XP and Exchange 2007 on SBS 2008. \\Steve// -Original Message- From: Robert Smith [mailto:exch...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters Has anyone had any experience with OutlookSpy, someone suggested that this utility would give the exact portion of an email that has been flagged. Thanks On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Robert Smith exch...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any way to determine which links in an email triggered the anti phishing filters in Outlook? We have had several emails coming in from consultants that have been flagged as suspicious therefore disabling all links. Being that there are multiple links in these emails, it would be nice to know which link(s) are triggering the filter. Thanks, Bob
