Exchange 2010 Internet facing multiple site Outlook Anywhere
Hi, I have an AD my mydom.local that contains 2 sites connected over ISA 2006 VPN tunnel. I have installed E2K10 SP1 on W2K8R2 in Site A Site B. Site A is in production. Site B is on its way to production. Both the sites are internet facing with different URL's. I am confused on how to tackle Outlook Anywhere? I prefer to have the users in Site A mailbox server connects to Site A server users of Site B mailbox server connects to Site B server directly. I don't prefer to proxying from Site A to Site B over the tunnel for users that are from Site B server. How can I achieve this? How can I achieve OOO, Calendaring etc.? Is there anything that I should take care of Autodiscover URL? I read so much info that I am lost. Any other info is much appreciated. Regards Liby Philip Mathew Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units
I have a situation were the parent company (A.com) is running Exchange 2007 and has multiple BU’s units that are COMPLETELY separate A/D Forests (b.com, c.com, d.com, etc). Most of these Business units are running email systems other then Exchange (Mostly Lotus Notes) and are currently receiving emails via u...@a.com. All is good as I have 1 internal relay connector set up that if it doesn’t match on the exchange server it relays the message to a notes server and it handles the delivery to all of the other business units. Now the challenge comes that several of the BU’s are being forced to switch to exchange 2010 (new CRM solution requires it) and they want to keep using u...@a.com as their primary addresses. (I will still have 10 to 12 bu’s running Notes). So this brings up at least 2 questions. 1. Since these are completely separate A/D forests how do I get all of the users into my A/D so a.com at least knows how to accept mail for these users (way too many users and groups to consider doing it manually). 2. is it even possible to route a.com to multiple internal relays without causing a massive routing headaches for all involved? Any thoughts or suggestions on how to make this work would be appreciated. -Mike --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units
[1] ILM/FIM are the automated solutions that MSFT has. Quest and NetWrix both sell others. I would suggest that you need a requirements analysis to determine exactly WHAT you need. ☺ [2] If Exchange or something like postfix are the “masters of all domains” then yes, it’s pretty easy to do. I can’t speak for Notes/Groupwise. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Mike Tavares [mailto:miketava...@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units I have a situation were the parent company (A.com) is running Exchange 2007 and has multiple BU’s units that are COMPLETELY separate A/D Forests (b.com, c.com, d.com, etc). Most of these Business units are running email systems other then Exchange (Mostly Lotus Notes) and are currently receiving emails via u...@a.commailto:u...@a.com. All is good as I have 1 internal relay connector set up that if it doesn’t match on the exchange server it relays the message to a notes server and it handles the delivery to all of the other business units. Now the challenge comes that several of the BU’s are being forced to switch to exchange 2010 (new CRM solution requires it) and they want to keep using u...@a.commailto:u...@a.com as their primary addresses. (I will still have 10 to 12 bu’s running Notes). So this brings up at least 2 questions. 1. Since these are completely separate A/D forests how do I get all of the users into my A/D so a.com at least knows how to accept mail for these users (way too many users and groups to consider doing it manually). 2. is it even possible to route a.com to multiple internal relays without causing a massive routing headaches for all involved? Any thoughts or suggestions on how to make this work would be appreciated. -Mike --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units
Thanks 1. Doesn’t surprise me. I already have ILM and Quest implemented for other A/D sync related activities for some other domain related stuff (just not mail routing) 2. So I would like to keep it native to Exchange if possible. My mail routing is way to complex as it is so I am looking to make it easier if possible. I just can’t figure out how to do it. What I would like it to do is this. All inbound mail to a.com is Handled by MAILServerA. There are local user on MailserverA. But if an email comes into us...@a.com and his/her mailbox is on Mailserverb, I want the mail to go directly to B, the same for us...@a.com if they are on MailserverC, etc, etc, and then of course there are the us...@a.com that will remain on different mail platforms, so routing should be able to determine that as well and send it via the correct connector to the relay server for them. Routing the Namespace to 1 different relay server is easy enough to accomplish, going to multiples has not been any fun. See I was spoiled by Domino. I have all the users in one addressbook, they all have their primary mail server listed, and notes just hands the message off to that mail server (regardless of the A/D they are a member of). -Mike From: Michael B. Smith Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 5:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units [1] ILM/FIM are the automated solutions that MSFT has. Quest and NetWrix both sell others. I would suggest that you need a requirements analysis to determine exactly WHAT you need. J [2] If Exchange or something like postfix are the “masters of all domains” then yes, it’s pretty easy to do. I can’t speak for Notes/Groupwise. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Mike Tavares [mailto:miketava...@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units I have a situation were the parent company (A.com) is running Exchange 2007 and has multiple BU’s units that are COMPLETELY separate A/D Forests (b.com, c.com, d.com, etc). Most of these Business units are running email systems other then Exchange (Mostly Lotus Notes) and are currently receiving emails via u...@a.com. All is good as I have 1 internal relay connector set up that if it doesn’t match on the exchange server it relays the message to a notes server and it handles the delivery to all of the other business units. Now the challenge comes that several of the BU’s are being forced to switch to exchange 2010 (new CRM solution requires it) and they want to keep using u...@a.com as their primary addresses. (I will still have 10 to 12 bu’s running Notes). So this brings up at least 2 questions. 1. Since these are completely separate A/D forests how do I get all of the users into my A/D so a.com at least knows how to accept mail for these users (way too many users and groups to consider doing it manually). 2. is it even possible to route a.com to multiple internal relays without causing a massive routing headaches for all involved? Any thoughts or suggestions on how to make this work would be appreciated. -Mike --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange 2010 design
Sent from my LG phone pramatow...@mediageneral.com pramatow...@mediageneral.com wrote: We went WNLB for a couple of reasons- $ and it was supported happily for our size/needs. Pretty sure it still is but MS doesn't seem to like it nearly as much as they used to-I'd guess based on real world experience? Today, those size/needs would steer towards HLB. IIRC it was a pain for us to set up and get going properly- whether that was WNLB, me, or just all the #$^! that was going on at the time, I dunno. Once it was going I guess it LB's well enough as long as all the boxes were up. not that it was a regular occurrence by any means but if we lost/had to reboot a box it did screw with all the connections on that box. Had to fiddle with patching too (drainstopping etc) but so it goes. Also unless we missed something obvious, the only health checking you have is basically a ping test, HLB goes past that. Stuff I've done resulting in 0 client complaints- Pulled power on the active Kemp Rebooted a CAS Powered down CAS My other response in this thread I rated at .0002 Paul Cents. This one I'll rate at a full .02 PC- Given you're going there anyway, get the network guys to make their decision and skip WNLB altogether:) Paul From: sms adm [sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 design How reliable was your WNLB? We're planning to do the same ... start with WNLB and move to HW NLB when our network guys decide what they will buy and when. Thx in advance On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:58 PM, pramatow...@mediageneral.commailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com wrote: Been running E2010 for a year now- We’re getting rid of WNLB, putting four Kemp loadmaster 2200’s into place, a high availability pair in each AD site Did one site yesterday, the other is planned for next week.We’re ~7K mailboxes with 2 real mbx/hub and 3 virtual cas in each site. ~1400 BB’s, few hundred EAS devs. Are you stuck on F5 for some reason? Not that I have any long experience with Kemp or anything but they seem to be pretty nice boxes for a very reasonable price… From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.commailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: neil.hob...@microsoft.commailto:neil.hob...@microsoft.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 design I need to do something very similar I need to decide if we want to use hardware from F5 or use NLB for an Exchange 2010 deployment. Thank you for the helpful links. Cheers Ryan From: Neil Hobson [mailto:neil.hob...@microsoft.commailto:neil.hob...@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 design In addition to what Phil said in his reply, for a good overview of the load balancing options I’d recommend reading this topic : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff625247.aspx FYI, if you go down the hardware load balancer route, here’s the page that lists the hardware load balancers that have completed solution testing with Exchange 2010 : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/gg176682.aspx HTH, Neil From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:l...@cem.dur.ac.ukmailto:l...@cem.dur.ac.uk] Sent: 13 June 2011 13:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 design Hi Everyone, I'm a bit new to this so my apologies if I've not understood something correctly. I'm trying to plan new hardware to deploy Exchange 2010 (100 users, average mailbox size 500MB) and am looking at using two servers with CAS, HT and Mailbox roles installed on both and using DAG for high availability. I was thinking of using Windows NLB for load balancing,but have read that this can't be used with DAG (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979781.aspx). My question is, if I set up two additional servers with NLB installed and moved the CAS and HT roles to them, would this solution then provide the load balancing I'm looking for? Alternatively, would I be better off with two highly redundant servers and use one for Mailbox and one for CAS and HT? Thanks for any advice! Laurence --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions
RE: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units
Sent from my LG phone Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: [1] ILM/FIM are the automated solutions that MSFT has. Quest and NetWrix both sell others. I would suggest that you need a requirements analysis to determine exactly WHAT you need. ☺ [2] If Exchange or something like postfix are the “masters of all domains” then yes, it’s pretty easy to do. I can’t speak for Notes/Groupwise. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Mike Tavares [mailto:miketava...@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units I have a situation were the parent company (A.com) is running Exchange 2007 and has multiple BU’s units that are COMPLETELY separate A/D Forests (b.com, c.com, d.com, etc). Most of these Business units are running email systems other then Exchange (Mostly Lotus Notes) and are currently receiving emails via u...@a.commailto:u...@a.com. All is good as I have 1 internal relay connector set up that if it doesn’t match on the exchange server it relays the message to a notes server and it handles the delivery to all of the other business units. Now the challenge comes that several of the BU’s are being forced to switch to exchange 2010 (new CRM solution requires it) and they want to keep using u...@a.commailto:u...@a.com as their primary addresses. (I will still have 10 to 12 bu’s running Notes). So this brings up at least 2 questions. 1. Since these are completely separate A/D forests how do I get all of the users into my A/D so a.com at least knows how to accept mail for these users (way too many users and groups to consider doing it manually). 2. is it even possible to route a.com to multiple internal relays without causing a massive routing headaches for all involved? Any thoughts or suggestions on how to make this work would be appreciated. -Mike --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
