RE: CCR Replication error Event ID 2147
Every time I see issues with CCRs I usually just end up replacing the SG. If you create a new SG, replicate it, then move the mailboxes you can control the bandwidth used. Very little else works. I wouldn't have bothered with eseutil myself, just recreated the SG and moved the mailboxes. Zero downtime, zero risk. Simon. From: Fergal O'Connell1 [mailto:foconn...@ie.ibm.com] Sent: 31 May 2012 10:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CCR Replication error Event ID 2147 Bump! I wont get the finance to open a PSS call with Microsoft. Anyway - I created a new mailstore moved all the mailboxes to the new store. Dismounted the faulty mailstore and did a eseutil /d - to remove all the whitespace and free up disk space eseutil /p eseutil /mh I am still getting the same error message. Any thoughts on resolving this? Can I delete this Storage group and still restore the mailstore etc From:Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com To:MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com, Date:24/05/2012 13:45 Subject:RE: CCR Replication error Event ID 2147 Then I'd open a CSS call. This isn't common enough that I've seen it. Perhaps simonB or stevieG or someone else has? From: Fergal O'Connell1 [mailto:foconn...@ie.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 7:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CCR Replication error Event ID 2147 I just don't understand why it works for 2 Storage groups but not this one! Is there a work around that I could try implement? Like moving all the users on that mail store to another mail store and then deleting the problematic storage group - but I would rather not have to do that if at all possible. I am also in the middle of restoring mailboxes to that mail store due to a legal issue - if I delete this mail store now will this affect the restores using an RSG Regards Fergal O'Connell ICT Network Support Cúram Software an IBM company From:Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com To:MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com, Date:24/05/2012 12:36 Subject:RE: CCR Replication error Event ID 2147 SMB2 caching is not a problem on Windows 2003. There are some fileserver tuning values that you can adjust on 2003, but I don't know if they'll help or not. See: http://forum.team-mediaportal.com/threads/fix-for-stuttering-corrupted-streaming-of-live-tv.91214/page-24 Windows 2003 and Exchange 2007 are a fairly rare combination in 2012. It's entirely possible you've run into an edge-case bug. -Original Message- From: foconn...@ie.ibm.commailto:foconn...@ie.ibm.com [mailto:foconn...@ie.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: CCR Replication error Event ID 2147 Hi I have a Windows 2003 CCR on Exchange 2007 SP3 R6. On one of the 3 Storage groups I have a failed copy status. And the following events are logged Log file action LogCopy failed for storage group MailSrv\MailStore4. Reason: Access to the path '\\cms1\30ecd310-0116-4031-b730-2fc8b28dcd8d$' is denied. There was a problem with 'cms1', which is an alternate name for 'CMS1'. The list of aliases is now 'cms1', and the alias 'was' removed from the list. The specific problem is 'Access to the path '\\cms1\30ecd310-0116-4031-b730-2fc8b28dcd8d$' is denied.'. The other storage groups are fine. I have tried to stop the replication service - delete the logs and the mail stores for the passive node and reseed the database. This has not fixed the issue. I have seen a lot of suggested fixes which should be fixed in SP2 and SP3 - also relatd articles in Windows 2008. Can somebody suggest a fix for this? Is this applicable to Windows 2003? http://problemgone.blogspot.com/2010/12/msexchange-repl-2104-logcopy-failed.html --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe
RE: dag issue?
Does anyone use circular logging on their primary dag node? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 16:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Huh. I've been using this in Win 2012. Didn't realize it was available in Win 2008 R2. Be aware: if you use this in a DAG situation, you then become responsible for all quorum management issues. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Very interesting, thanks. From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]mailto:[mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 15:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? I believe this will work for you. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2494036 Chuck Robinson ___ Sr. Solutions Architect Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010 MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008 EMC Consulting Mobile: 973-865-0394 chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting Transforming Information Into Business Results From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Do you know if there is a way to have a two node multisite Dag that cannot failover unless I want to. I don't mean -Activateonly where the DB on the remote site cannot come up, I mean where the primary node can have its witness get rebooted or itself and the DBs in the Primary will always come up with out the remote node stealing quorum? Regards Paul. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 12:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? What I don't understand is why it effected all databases on the server when there was only one DB in the dag, it doesn't sound right because what if I wanted to have an active active? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 09:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? If it's multi-site yep Steve From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 08:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? This does sound like what happened, I was a bit surprised as I only had one test DB in the Dag, I didn't expect it to effect all databases. Would you still go with having DAC mode on? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 07:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: dag issue? As a first point of call I would look at increasing the cluster timeout settings. I've heard similar things about Veeam before during backup - mainly nodes failing over and IIRC there is some threads on the Veeam Community site about the issue. Steve Sent from my iPhone On 27 May 2012, at 11:07, Paul Cookman paul.cook...@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote: I had an issue Friday morning I wanted to run past someone. I have created a two node Dag multisite with witness in the primary site, DAC enabled. I am testing as I go so I only had a test DB as part of the DAG. (Servers are Virtualised and use Veeam for backups) While committing the snapshot the primary server momentarily lost communication to all servers and all the (LIVE) databases dismounted and wouldn't remount. In a state of panic I removed the Dag to get users working again. I think from going through the logs that possibly the remote site node got quorum of the witness and then it believed that the databases were up on the remote site (set to Activate only and not automatic by the way). Possibly if I had rebooted the remote server the primary would of got quorum again and allowed me to mount databases? Any thoughts on this as I need to be able to reboot the primary server if needed without the databases not being able to mount. I don't mind my failover being completely a manual process. What do you think on what happened and a solution to my problem? Kindest regards, Paul. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to
RE: dag issue?
Lots of people. If you aren't doing backups, there is no need to retain logfiles... From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 3:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Does anyone use circular logging on their primary dag node? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 16:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Huh. I've been using this in Win 2012. Didn't realize it was available in Win 2008 R2. Be aware: if you use this in a DAG situation, you then become responsible for all quorum management issues. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Very interesting, thanks. From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]mailto:[mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 15:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? I believe this will work for you. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2494036 Chuck Robinson ___ Sr. Solutions Architect Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010 MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008 EMC Consulting Mobile: 973-865-0394 chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting Transforming Information Into Business Results From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Do you know if there is a way to have a two node multisite Dag that cannot failover unless I want to. I don't mean -Activateonly where the DB on the remote site cannot come up, I mean where the primary node can have its witness get rebooted or itself and the DBs in the Primary will always come up with out the remote node stealing quorum? Regards Paul. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 12:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? What I don't understand is why it effected all databases on the server when there was only one DB in the dag, it doesn't sound right because what if I wanted to have an active active? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 09:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? If it's multi-site yep Steve From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 08:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? This does sound like what happened, I was a bit surprised as I only had one test DB in the Dag, I didn't expect it to effect all databases. Would you still go with having DAC mode on? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 07:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: dag issue? As a first point of call I would look at increasing the cluster timeout settings. I've heard similar things about Veeam before during backup - mainly nodes failing over and IIRC there is some threads on the Veeam Community site about the issue. Steve Sent from my iPhone On 27 May 2012, at 11:07, Paul Cookman paul.cook...@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote: I had an issue Friday morning I wanted to run past someone. I have created a two node Dag multisite with witness in the primary site, DAC enabled. I am testing as I go so I only had a test DB as part of the DAG. (Servers are Virtualised and use Veeam for backups) While committing the snapshot the primary server momentarily lost communication to all servers and all the (LIVE) databases dismounted and wouldn't remount. In a state of panic I removed the Dag to get users working again. I think from going through the logs that possibly the remote site node got quorum of the witness and then it believed that the databases were up on the remote site (set to Activate only and not automatic by the way). Possibly if I had rebooted the remote server the primary would of got quorum again and allowed me to mount databases? Any thoughts on this as I need to be able to reboot the primary server if needed without the databases not being able to mount. I don't mind my failover being completely a manual process. What do you think on what happened and a solution to my problem? Kindest regards, Paul. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to
RE: dag issue?
I do backups, I am just finding that Veeam is not committing the logs when any of the databases are set to replicate. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 01 June 2012 09:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Lots of people. If you aren't doing backups, there is no need to retain logfiles... From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 3:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Does anyone use circular logging on their primary dag node? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 16:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Huh. I've been using this in Win 2012. Didn't realize it was available in Win 2008 R2. Be aware: if you use this in a DAG situation, you then become responsible for all quorum management issues. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Very interesting, thanks. From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]mailto:[mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 15:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? I believe this will work for you. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2494036 Chuck Robinson ___ Sr. Solutions Architect Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010 MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008 EMC Consulting Mobile: 973-865-0394 chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting Transforming Information Into Business Results From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Do you know if there is a way to have a two node multisite Dag that cannot failover unless I want to. I don't mean -Activateonly where the DB on the remote site cannot come up, I mean where the primary node can have its witness get rebooted or itself and the DBs in the Primary will always come up with out the remote node stealing quorum? Regards Paul. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 12:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? What I don't understand is why it effected all databases on the server when there was only one DB in the dag, it doesn't sound right because what if I wanted to have an active active? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 09:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? If it's multi-site yep Steve From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 08:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? This does sound like what happened, I was a bit surprised as I only had one test DB in the Dag, I didn't expect it to effect all databases. Would you still go with having DAC mode on? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 07:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: dag issue? As a first point of call I would look at increasing the cluster timeout settings. I've heard similar things about Veeam before during backup - mainly nodes failing over and IIRC there is some threads on the Veeam Community site about the issue. Steve Sent from my iPhone On 27 May 2012, at 11:07, Paul Cookman paul.cook...@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote: I had an issue Friday morning I wanted to run past someone. I have created a two node Dag multisite with witness in the primary site, DAC enabled. I am testing as I go so I only had a test DB as part of the DAG. (Servers are Virtualised and use Veeam for backups) While committing the snapshot the primary server momentarily lost communication to all servers and all the (LIVE) databases dismounted and wouldn't remount. In a state of panic I removed the Dag to get users working again. I think from going through the logs that possibly the remote site node got quorum of the witness and then it believed that the databases were up on the remote site (set to Activate only and not automatic by the way). Possibly if I had rebooted the remote server the primary would of got quorum again and allowed me to mount databases? Any thoughts on this as I need to be able to reboot the primary server if needed without the databases not being able to mount. I don't mind my failover being completely a manual process. What do you think on what happened and a solution to my problem? Kindest regards, Paul. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email
RE: dag issue?
Ah. Well, circular logging eliminates the possibility of point-in-time recovery (just like simple logging in SQL). If that's ok with you, then turn it on. But I'd personally get Veeam to fix their problem. VSS is really not that hard. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 5:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? I do backups, I am just finding that Veeam is not committing the logs when any of the databases are set to replicate. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 01 June 2012 09:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Lots of people. If you aren't doing backups, there is no need to retain logfiles... From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 3:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Does anyone use circular logging on their primary dag node? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 16:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Huh. I've been using this in Win 2012. Didn't realize it was available in Win 2008 R2. Be aware: if you use this in a DAG situation, you then become responsible for all quorum management issues. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Very interesting, thanks. From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]mailto:[mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 15:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? I believe this will work for you. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2494036 Chuck Robinson ___ Sr. Solutions Architect Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010 MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008 EMC Consulting Mobile: 973-865-0394 chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting Transforming Information Into Business Results From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Do you know if there is a way to have a two node multisite Dag that cannot failover unless I want to. I don't mean -Activateonly where the DB on the remote site cannot come up, I mean where the primary node can have its witness get rebooted or itself and the DBs in the Primary will always come up with out the remote node stealing quorum? Regards Paul. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 12:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? What I don't understand is why it effected all databases on the server when there was only one DB in the dag, it doesn't sound right because what if I wanted to have an active active? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 09:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? If it's multi-site yep Steve From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 08:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? This does sound like what happened, I was a bit surprised as I only had one test DB in the Dag, I didn't expect it to effect all databases. Would you still go with having DAC mode on? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 07:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: dag issue? As a first point of call I would look at increasing the cluster timeout settings. I've heard similar things about Veeam before during backup - mainly nodes failing over and IIRC there is some threads on the Veeam Community site about the issue. Steve Sent from my iPhone On 27 May 2012, at 11:07, Paul Cookman paul.cook...@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote: I had an issue Friday morning I wanted to run past someone. I have created a two node Dag multisite with witness in the primary site, DAC enabled. I am testing as I go so I only had a test DB as part of the DAG. (Servers are Virtualised and use Veeam for backups) While committing the snapshot the primary server momentarily lost communication to all servers and all the (LIVE) databases dismounted and wouldn't remount. In a state of panic I removed the Dag to get users working again. I think from going through the logs that possibly the remote site node got quorum of the witness and then it believed that the databases were up on the remote site (set to Activate only and not automatic by the way). Possibly if I had rebooted the remote server the primary would of got quorum again and
RE: dag issue?
Ok, thanks for the advice as always. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 01 June 2012 10:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Ah. Well, circular logging eliminates the possibility of point-in-time recovery (just like simple logging in SQL). If that's ok with you, then turn it on. But I'd personally get Veeam to fix their problem. VSS is really not that hard. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 5:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? I do backups, I am just finding that Veeam is not committing the logs when any of the databases are set to replicate. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 01 June 2012 09:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Lots of people. If you aren't doing backups, there is no need to retain logfiles... From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 3:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Does anyone use circular logging on their primary dag node? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 16:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Huh. I've been using this in Win 2012. Didn't realize it was available in Win 2008 R2. Be aware: if you use this in a DAG situation, you then become responsible for all quorum management issues. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Very interesting, thanks. From: Robinson, Chuck [mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com]mailto:[mailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com] Sent: 30 May 2012 15:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? I believe this will work for you. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2494036 Chuck Robinson ___ Sr. Solutions Architect Microsoft Certified Master: Exchange 2010 MCITP: EA Windows Server 2008 EMC Consulting Mobile: 973-865-0394 chuck.robin...@emc.commailto:chuck.robin...@emc.com www.emc.com/consultinghttp://www.emc.com/consulting Transforming Information Into Business Results From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? Do you know if there is a way to have a two node multisite Dag that cannot failover unless I want to. I don't mean -Activateonly where the DB on the remote site cannot come up, I mean where the primary node can have its witness get rebooted or itself and the DBs in the Primary will always come up with out the remote node stealing quorum? Regards Paul. From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 12:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? What I don't understand is why it effected all databases on the server when there was only one DB in the dag, it doesn't sound right because what if I wanted to have an active active? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 09:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? If it's multi-site yep Steve From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2012 08:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: dag issue? This does sound like what happened, I was a bit surprised as I only had one test DB in the Dag, I didn't expect it to effect all databases. Would you still go with having DAC mode on? From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: 28 May 2012 07:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: dag issue? As a first point of call I would look at increasing the cluster timeout settings. I've heard similar things about Veeam before during backup - mainly nodes failing over and IIRC there is some threads on the Veeam Community site about the issue. Steve Sent from my iPhone On 27 May 2012, at 11:07, Paul Cookman paul.cook...@selection.co.ukmailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote: I had an issue Friday morning I wanted to run past someone. I have created a two node Dag multisite with witness in the primary site, DAC enabled. I am testing as I go so I only had a test DB as part of the DAG. (Servers are Virtualised and use Veeam for backups) While committing the snapshot the primary server momentarily lost communication to all servers and all the (LIVE) databases dismounted and wouldn't remount. In a state of panic I removed the Dag to get users working again. I think from going through the logs that possibly the remote site node got quorum of the
RE: Distribution lists in GUI tree view?
Gonna need a 3rd party app for that. We're currently looking for the same tool (plus admin capabilities): http://www.stealthbits.com/directory-services/active-directory http://www.adutils.com/jiji-active-directory-reports.aspx?index=0 http://www.ldapsoft.com/activedirectoryreports/adreports.html http://www.varonis.com/products/datadvantage/directory-services/index.html Quest (old ScriptLogic) has one also. Regards, Don Guyer Catholic Health East - Information Technology Enterprise Directory Messaging Services 3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073 email: dgu...@che.orgmailto:dgu...@che.org Office: 610.550.3595 | Cell: 610.955.6528 | Fax: 610.271.9440 For immediate assistance, please open a HEAT ticket or call the helpdesk @ 610-492-3839. [cid:image001.jpg@01CD3FDD.AA922840] From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 8:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Distribution lists in GUI tree view? I would like to see nested distribution lists and members without opening the properties of each distribution list. -Andy From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 7:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Distribution lists in GUI tree view? Help me help you. What's wrong with AD Users Computers or the AD Administrative Center? From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]mailto:[mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 7:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Distribution lists in GUI tree view? Does anyone know of application that display all an origination's distribution lists and possibly security groups in a tree style view? We have a ton of distro lists and security groups, many of which were here before I started and I would like to map them all out so that I can do a clean up. Thanks, Andy Leedy ** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - The information transmitted in this message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank you. Butler Schein Animal Health ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Catholic Health East and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender regarding the error in a separate email. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.jpg
Need some help with a Beta Test
HI All, Know anyone that can jump on this and help out? Please forward to anyone you know. Make 30 Bucks In 30 Minutes!: Beta Test We need immediate Beta Testers for our Internet Security Awareness Training! This is a THIS WEEKEND thing. We need your feedback before Sunday night. You can make 30 bucks in 30 minutes. Do the training, fill out the survey and the first 10 people to respond get a $30 Amazon Gift Cert sent to them on Monday. Anyone else still gets a very nice surprise reward. Help keep the Internet safe and please do this immediately!? Thanks so much in advance. http://blog.knowbe4.com/make-30-bucks-in-30-minutes-beta-test/ Warm regards, Stu --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
