RE: RE : It's Friday!!
35 with 11 children (i have a pic to prove it) now lets move on. -Original Message- From: Adams, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!! 32 and 2 children (7yr old born on 4th of July and a 2yr old). I am a twin. -Original Message- From: Gérard Dumazet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE : It's Friday!! 63 and 6 children ! -Message d'origine- De : Bart Southworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2002 04:50 À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : Re: It's Friday!! 40. 7, 5, 2.5 Get over it. ;-) - Original Message - From: Wayne Hanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 8:50 PM Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 38 with 2 boys, 3 and 8months (try surviving for 3 years with very limited sleep, It makes you realise why people can go postal over the dummest things:-) ) -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2002 5:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I am 53, and have 2 boys 23 and 20, and a 19 year old daughter. The 23 year old got his Netware Admin Cert in HS. But I sure feel older than 53.. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 48 and I'll see your 4 + 6 year old and raise you two daughters 15 + 18 and an 11 year old son. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! How about 50 with a 4 and 6 year old boy. Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation Tel: 1-877-GO-AMICO http://www.amico.com/ www.amico.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 16:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Thank God, somebody on here is older than me! 44 (with a 16 and a 2 yr old boy) -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Byte me! 46 -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I am so freaking old I'm thinking about arguing for early acceptance for Kroger's Seniors discount... 26 -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Has anyone noticed that most of the responses are from the 20 somethings? lol -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Ripe age of 22 :-) -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! i just turned 24 -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 14:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! i just turned 22 haha ;) -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:21 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: It's Friday!! Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Man how old are you guys??? Lol My daughter makes me feel old, but YOU guys keep me young! -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Hey Martin congrats, My two girls have grown and moved on but keep coming back with grandkids. Enjoy it really does go quick. I will have a beer in Vegas next for you. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Very Nice! You be the MAN! Cheerish the moments as they seem to go by so fast. MJ 3 sons, all gone. -Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! http://216.39.101.68/martin/index.htm http://216.39.101.68/martin/index.htm -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I don't get it
RE: RE : It's Friday!!
one wife (and one ex) combined family I carry two loaded 9mm with 13 round clips to work everyday.everyone will know why when I snap ticktick...tick. Jeff (yes I am kidding about the gunsthey have 10 round clips...lol) -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!! Dear gods how did this get started again. Hey Jeff are you that guy from Dateline that has 8 wives in Utah? -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!! 35 with 11 children (i have a pic to prove it) now lets move on. -Original Message- From: Adams, Shawn [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!! 32 and 2 children (7yr old born on 4th of July and a 2yr old). I am a twin. -Original Message- From: Gérard Dumazet [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE : It's Friday!! 63 and 6 children ! -Message d'origine- De : Bart Southworth [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2002 04:50 À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : Re: It's Friday!! 40. 7, 5, 2.5 Get over it. ;-) - Original Message - From: Wayne Hanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 8:50 PM Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 38 with 2 boys, 3 and 8months (try surviving for 3 years with very limited sleep, It makes you realise why people can go postal over the dummest things:-) ) -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2002 5:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I am 53, and have 2 boys 23 and 20, and a 19 year old daughter. The 23 year old got his Netware Admin Cert in HS. But I sure feel older than 53.. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 48 and I'll see your 4 + 6 year old and raise you two daughters 15 + 18 and an 11 year old son. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! How about 50 with a 4 and 6 year old boy. Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation Tel: 1-877-GO-AMICO http://www.amico.com/ www.amico.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 16:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Thank God, somebody on here is older than me! 44 (with a 16 and a 2 yr old boy) -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Byte me! 46 -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I am so freaking old I'm thinking about arguing for early acceptance for Kroger's Seniors discount... 26 -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Has anyone noticed that most of the responses are from the 20 somethings? lol -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Ripe age of 22 :-) -Original Message- From: Precht, David [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! i just turned 24 -Original Message- From: Paul Green [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 14:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! i just turned 22 haha ;) -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:21 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: It's Friday!! Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Man how old are you guys??? Lol My daughter makes me feel old, but YOU guys keep me young! -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Hey
Double-take failover
Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
both PDC and BDC are running nt server 4.0 SP 6 when failover occurs, I can see the #2 server lose all connections(ie red x over the 4 servers running double-take) from the PDC server manager...network path cannot be found(both #1 and #2 servers) when I try to reboot the #2 server with the #1 server off of the network, I no longer can access the domain, and the only way I have found to get back in is to remove it and re-enter the domain. Jeff -Original Message- From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover I concur there are no issues with using it in my test lab what so ever. The issue looks to be that the #2 server doesn't have a user account for the domain? Is the issue that when you reboot the 2nd machine and go to do an admin login? -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 17:00 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Double-Take works fine with Exchange 5.5, although I admit I do not know the cause of this particular problem, I don't think it is specific to Double-Take. Our list host (Sunbelt Software) sells this fine product. http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/product.cfm?id=111 and NSI includes Exchange-specific configuration details. I may be wrong, but I thought I read at one point where it had been tested with Exchange by Microsoft. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
umm, ok (note to self) but since in this instance I am stuck with itanyone have any advice? Jeff -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
I have a dedicated PDC (well exchange isn't on it anyway). and yes one exchange server fails over to another exchange sever. so it works good for you? any issues with domain login after failover? are you using WINS? Thanks, Jeff -Original Message- From: Todd Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do you have a dedicated PDC or is it one of the Exchange Servers? On the double-take configuration are you failing one exchange server over to another or do the exchange servers failover to a dedicated target server? I don't know if Microsoft certified double-take or not but I know it works very well. todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 08:34AM Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
I am suspecting something is up with the WINS database. I am cetainly no expert and its time to RTFM on WINS. any advice on what to look for in there? my maintenance agreement (NSI) ran out long ago and its $1195 per server to reinstate them. I'll be trying to fix it on my own for now. Thanks, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover There certainly is a spot to change the failover time! I have it set to 15 minutes on my Exchange server, that gives me time for the occasional reboot. I believe Sunbelt was also supporting Double-Take, but I would imagine that to be the case only if you purchased it through them. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: unhold
HOLDING on the offense... 10 yard penalty from the spot of the foulFIRST DOWN! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: unhold I wasn't holding in the first place... ;o) D -Original Message- From: gary gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: unhold List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: unhold
it was actually holding on the defense after the interception(change of possession, so maybe its now offense) umm...so first down. heh J -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: unhold Isn't that repeat First Down ? ;o) Or was that Holding on the kicking team? D -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: unhold HOLDING on the offense... 10 yard penalty from the spot of the foulFIRST DOWN! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: unhold I wasn't holding in the first place... ;o) D -Original Message- From: gary gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: unhold List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
pop3 and port 25
Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
I don't know?? is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!? how do I tell and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever, client or both? Jeff -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients? Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
NEVER!!! and you can't make me!!! I got mah peeps feeding me info and I'll figger it out. I only have 2 machines I am working with and I believe I have one of the done rightonce I get the other one I'll be home free! under tools services, the one says Microsoft Exchange Server the other one doesn't..yet Jeff psthanks Rob! -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Time to call in a consulting firm kiddo. Since you can send and receive mail it is more then likely not the IMS. My hunch is that Outlook is the outlook client thinks it is looking for internet when it should be set for corporate. It is also probably not even connect to the server. Look at Tools, Services, . Does it say Microsoft Exchange Server on the services tab? Under delivery does it say mailbox with person name? -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 I don't know?? is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!? how do I tell and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever, client or both? Jeff -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients? Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
peeps are synonymous with homies -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 BTW what is a peeps -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 NEVER!!! and you can't make me!!! I got mah peeps feeding me info and I'll figger it out. I only have 2 machines I am working with and I believe I have one of the done rightonce I get the other one I'll be home free! under tools services, the one says Microsoft Exchange Server the other one doesn't..yet Jeff psthanks Rob! -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Time to call in a consulting firm kiddo. Since you can send and receive mail it is more then likely not the IMS. My hunch is that Outlook is the outlook client thinks it is looking for internet when it should be set for corporate. It is also probably not even connect to the server. Look at Tools, Services, . Does it say Microsoft Exchange Server on the services tab? Under delivery does it say mailbox with person name? -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 I don't know?? is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!? how do I tell and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever, client or both? Jeff -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients? Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
ahhh fooey someone had internet mail only selected on the other boxahhh so I kicked my own A$$ for thatthen outlook was corrupt, had to reinstall...blah bottom line...got mail flowing:) yay! Jeff -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 more power to you? Tools - Services - Properties Put in the name of the exchange server Put in the persons mailbox name (not always the log on name) then try it again -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 NEVER!!! and you can't make me!!! I got mah peeps feeding me info and I'll figger it out. I only have 2 machines I am working with and I believe I have one of the done rightonce I get the other one I'll be home free! under tools services, the one says Microsoft Exchange Server the other one doesn't..yet Jeff psthanks Rob! -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Time to call in a consulting firm kiddo. Since you can send and receive mail it is more then likely not the IMS. My hunch is that Outlook is the outlook client thinks it is looking for internet when it should be set for corporate. It is also probably not even connect to the server. Look at Tools, Services, . Does it say Microsoft Exchange Server on the services tab? Under delivery does it say mailbox with person name? -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 I don't know?? is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!? how do I tell and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever, client or both? Jeff -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients? Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
oh, and thanks for your help :) -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 ahhh fooey someone had internet mail only selected on the other boxahhh so I kicked my own A$$ for thatthen outlook was corrupt, had to reinstall...blah bottom line...got mail flowing:) yay! Jeff -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 more power to you? Tools - Services - Properties Put in the name of the exchange server Put in the persons mailbox name (not always the log on name) then try it again -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 NEVER!!! and you can't make me!!! I got mah peeps feeding me info and I'll figger it out. I only have 2 machines I am working with and I believe I have one of the done rightonce I get the other one I'll be home free! under tools services, the one says Microsoft Exchange Server the other one doesn't..yet Jeff psthanks Rob! -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Time to call in a consulting firm kiddo. Since you can send and receive mail it is more then likely not the IMS. My hunch is that Outlook is the outlook client thinks it is looking for internet when it should be set for corporate. It is also probably not even connect to the server. Look at Tools, Services, . Does it say Microsoft Exchange Server on the services tab? Under delivery does it say mailbox with person name? -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 I don't know?? is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!? how do I tell and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever, client or both? Jeff -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients? Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: WAKE UP!!!!
brings new meaning to carry on baggage -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WAKE UP Fly Naked! -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WAKE UP The intel failed, the metal detectors failed, the x-ray machines failed, and the baggage inspections failed. Ultimately the last line of defense, and the only one that worked at all was the passengers. Maybe we should be looking at developing that last line of defense, rather than trying to find ways to disarm it. -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WAKE UP No need to bother, I already know how easy it would be. I think it is a fine analogy. Security is security. If you don't change/update it, the bad guys will find the holes in it. -Original Message- From: Andrew Baker [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
