RE: The recipient was detected looping within the message transfe r service
version? SP? Q185024? Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-4501 1120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 -Original Message- From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: The recipient was detected looping within the message transfer service Hi All, When a user sends a message to a bunch of distribution lists (all users in the list are internal users) and he CCs an external user, he gets an NDR for the external user with the error message The recipient was detected looping within the message transfer service. Has anyone seen this? Any ideas? Thanks, Rodney Li List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: team calendar
Title: Message I think William posted this link some time back. I hope this is what you are looking for. http://www.slipstick.com/addins/calendar.htm Mal -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: team calendar i think i have that, but how do i use it.. i installed it, but I dont see much more.. if its useful only for pst files, or net folders.. we dont use those. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: team calendar there is an awesome one that MS made, and its free...search the msdn for "Outlook Team Calendars" i believe its version 2.0d Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: team calendar Please help me out.. ive just gotten my first request for a team calendar.. how can i set this up with e 5.5 sp4 and outlook 2000 ?List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Compacting
He knows what he is talking. He can take care of himself I guess :) Mal -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Ready and waiting... -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Be careful Andy. be prepared to be harassed.. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Im not convinced. -Original Message- From: Lambert, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Only if you need to recover the disk space. In the application log, a 1221 event is generated after the automatic online defrag completes that indicates the amount of disk space that can be recovered. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Never? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting DON'T DEFRAG!!! - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Compacting 2000, 5.5, all versions? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Has it been a month already? Since it is a bright relational database, it runs an online maintenance process nightly by default that defrags the contents of the databases. It takes care of itself. William -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Compacting Friends and astute members of the exchange list. Please forgive such basic questions but I am new to exchange. (came from lotus notes) Since exchange is essentially a database, I would assume this database gets fragmented. Is there a tool that can be used to unfragment? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
RE: Compacting
Pay attention in class, else you will learn only half. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting That freak was the one holding you down while I beat you until you understood. He's trolling for fresh fish out of boredom perhaps. Pay attention in class. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting Yes I know. It is a learning process!!! I have never stated that I know everything, unlike this FREAK just did. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Yeah, it took me 5 or 6 e-mail to beat that into YOUR head. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting O crap. Are you nutz? You are trying to defend running ESEUTIL AND BLBs?? Do you have a death wish? That has never been done successfully. Not individually, nor collectively. All hard core Exchange Admins who have been doing this for years have both of those items on the black list. We have gone round and round here for months on both issues. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Compacting thats why I do BLB. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this person means don't compact the store. Running eseutil can be a dangerous thing. Running either of the utilities that will change the structure of the store, can be a dangerous thing and should only be done in extreme measures (like if the IS wont start and you don't have a decent-recent backup of the store, or if you have a huge priv.edb file are running out of diskspace and know that compacting would free up a lot of space an have cheap managers who wont spend money on either more disk space or another server to offload folks to). As you will see, many folks in here are weary (with good reason) about running eseutil against the store. About the only util people tend to run is isinteg just to check the integrity of the store. Even if it needs to be fixed, most folks will just build another server and move mailboxes off of the server with a store that may have a lot of errors or is too big for its own good. Bottom line again, is to only use eseutil as a last ditch effort or isinteg -fix if the store is not accessible. FWIW - these are the reasons you keep impeccable backups of your stores and transaction logs - just like Wilford Brimley says check your blood sugar and check it often, exchange admins say check your backups and check them daily. Once you have a good base of backups, a couple weeks to a month, you will want to test and document your disaster recovery methods 1) to make sure it works and b) to get it down packed so you can do it in a minimal amount of time. Also, I recommend never letting your stores (mostly the priv.edb) get out of hand (getting too big) because it becomes harder to manage it (longer to back it up, longer to restore it, etc.) If it does get too big, either implement strict or more strict mailbox storage policies or simply build another exchange server and move users off of it - if it is e2k, of course, storage groups are a god send for thing like this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:10 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Compacting Never? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting DON'T DEFRAG!!! - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Compacting 2000, 5.5, all versions? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Has it been a month already? Since it is a bright relational database, it runs an online maintenance process nightly by default that defrags the contents of the databases. It takes care of itself. William -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Compacting Friends and astute members of the exchange list. Please forgive such basic questions but I
RE: Compacting
Zen master (not me) says talk less, listen more and me says Read more, type less. Mal -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting I thought I recognized that name. Oh well. It is Monday. I can only half pay attention Zen master. - Original Message - From: Mal Sasalu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Pay attention in class, else you will learn only half. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting That freak was the one holding you down while I beat you until you understood. He's trolling for fresh fish out of boredom perhaps. Pay attention in class. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting Yes I know. It is a learning process!!! I have never stated that I know everything, unlike this FREAK just did. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Yeah, it took me 5 or 6 e-mail to beat that into YOUR head. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting O crap. Are you nutz? You are trying to defend running ESEUTIL AND BLBs?? Do you have a death wish? That has never been done successfully. Not individually, nor collectively. All hard core Exchange Admins who have been doing this for years have both of those items on the black list. We have gone round and round here for months on both issues. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Compacting thats why I do BLB. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this person means don't compact the store. Running eseutil can be a dangerous thing. Running either of the utilities that will change the structure of the store, can be a dangerous thing and should only be done in extreme measures (like if the IS wont start and you don't have a decent-recent backup of the store, or if you have a huge priv.edb file are running out of diskspace and know that compacting would free up a lot of space an have cheap managers who wont spend money on either more disk space or another server to offload folks to). As you will see, many folks in here are weary (with good reason) about running eseutil against the store. About the only util people tend to run is isinteg just to check the integrity of the store. Even if it needs to be fixed, most folks will just build another server and move mailboxes off of the server with a store that may have a lot of errors or is too big for its own good. Bottom line again, is to only use eseutil as a last ditch effort or isinteg -fix if the store is not accessible. FWIW - these are the reasons you keep impeccable backups of your stores and transaction logs - just like Wilford Brimley says check your blood sugar and check it often, exchange admins say check your backups and check them daily. Once you have a good base of backups, a couple weeks to a month, you will want to test and document your disaster recovery methods 1) to make sure it works and b) to get it down packed so you can do it in a minimal amount of time. Also, I recommend never letting your stores (mostly the priv.edb) get out of hand (getting too big) because it becomes harder to manage it (longer to back it up, longer to restore it, etc.) If it does get too big, either implement strict or more strict mailbox storage policies or simply build another exchange server and move users off of it - if it is e2k, of course, storage groups are a god send for thing like this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:10 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Compacting Never? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting DON'T DEFRAG!!! - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Compacting 2000, 5.5, all versions? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24
RE: Compacting
I respect your opinion. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Zen master? I listen to others and in no way claim to be a master in Exchange. I pay particular attention to what certain people have to say based on what they've done, not read about. William and Missy are two people that I will always respect the opinion of. It doesn't mean that I think they are always right, but most of the time they probably are. It all depends on what the person is talking about and how I can relate that to my environment. I do like the read more, type less statement. What OS and SP is that? -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Zen master (not me) says talk less, listen more and me says Read more, type less. Mal -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting I thought I recognized that name. Oh well. It is Monday. I can only half pay attention Zen master. - Original Message - From: Mal Sasalu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Pay attention in class, else you will learn only half. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting That freak was the one holding you down while I beat you until you understood. He's trolling for fresh fish out of boredom perhaps. Pay attention in class. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting Yes I know. It is a learning process!!! I have never stated that I know everything, unlike this FREAK just did. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Yeah, it took me 5 or 6 e-mail to beat that into YOUR head. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting O crap. Are you nutz? You are trying to defend running ESEUTIL AND BLBs?? Do you have a death wish? That has never been done successfully. Not individually, nor collectively. All hard core Exchange Admins who have been doing this for years have both of those items on the black list. We have gone round and round here for months on both issues. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Compacting thats why I do BLB. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this person means don't compact the store. Running eseutil can be a dangerous thing. Running either of the utilities that will change the structure of the store, can be a dangerous thing and should only be done in extreme measures (like if the IS wont start and you don't have a decent-recent backup of the store, or if you have a huge priv.edb file are running out of diskspace and know that compacting would free up a lot of space an have cheap managers who wont spend money on either more disk space or another server to offload folks to). As you will see, many folks in here are weary (with good reason) about running eseutil against the store. About the only util people tend to run is isinteg just to check the integrity of the store. Even if it needs to be fixed, most folks will just build another server and move mailboxes off of the server with a store that may have a lot of errors or is too big for its own good. Bottom line again, is to only use eseutil as a last ditch effort or isinteg -fix if the store is not accessible. FWIW - these are the reasons you keep impeccable backups of your stores and transaction logs - just like Wilford Brimley says check your blood sugar and check it often, exchange admins say check your backups and check them daily. Once you have a good base of backups, a couple weeks to a month, you will want to test and document your disaster recovery methods 1) to make sure it works and b) to get it down packed so you can do it in a minimal amount of time. Also, I recommend never letting your stores (mostly the priv.edb) get out of hand (getting too big) because it becomes harder to manage it (longer to back it up, longer to restore it, etc.) If it does get too big, either implement
RE: Compacting
m but markets are filled with that pattern though :) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting This doesn't mean that we'll be picking out china patterns. ;-) -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting I respect your opinion. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Zen master? I listen to others and in no way claim to be a master in Exchange. I pay particular attention to what certain people have to say based on what they've done, not read about. William and Missy are two people that I will always respect the opinion of. It doesn't mean that I think they are always right, but most of the time they probably are. It all depends on what the person is talking about and how I can relate that to my environment. I do like the read more, type less statement. What OS and SP is that? -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Zen master (not me) says talk less, listen more and me says Read more, type less. Mal -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting I thought I recognized that name. Oh well. It is Monday. I can only half pay attention Zen master. - Original Message - From: Mal Sasalu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Pay attention in class, else you will learn only half. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting That freak was the one holding you down while I beat you until you understood. He's trolling for fresh fish out of boredom perhaps. Pay attention in class. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting Yes I know. It is a learning process!!! I have never stated that I know everything, unlike this FREAK just did. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Yeah, it took me 5 or 6 e-mail to beat that into YOUR head. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting O crap. Are you nutz? You are trying to defend running ESEUTIL AND BLBs?? Do you have a death wish? That has never been done successfully. Not individually, nor collectively. All hard core Exchange Admins who have been doing this for years have both of those items on the black list. We have gone round and round here for months on both issues. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Compacting thats why I do BLB. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this person means don't compact the store. Running eseutil can be a dangerous thing. Running either of the utilities that will change the structure of the store, can be a dangerous thing and should only be done in extreme measures (like if the IS wont start and you don't have a decent-recent backup of the store, or if you have a huge priv.edb file are running out of diskspace and know that compacting would free up a lot of space an have cheap managers who wont spend money on either more disk space or another server to offload folks to). As you will see, many folks in here are weary (with good reason) about running eseutil against the store. About the only util people tend to run is isinteg just to check the integrity of the store. Even if it needs to be fixed, most folks will just build another server and move mailboxes off of the server with a store that may have a lot of errors or is too big for its own good. Bottom line again, is to only use eseutil as a last ditch effort or isinteg -fix if the store is not accessible. FWIW - these are the reasons you keep impeccable backups of your stores and transaction logs - just like Wilford Brimley says check your blood sugar and check it often, exchange admins say check your backups and check them daily. Once you have
RE: vpn and exchange
I would follow this route - Ping the exchange server from the client by the IP address Ping the exchange by name. In the exchange server properties on outlook change the sever name to FQDN (As steven stated). You can also add an entry in the host file for the exchange server. Then try having the client run the command net use \\Domainname\servername\IPC$ /user:domainname\username Also check weather the client can map any other drive on other servers. Just my thoughts! Mal -Original Message- From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: vpn and exchange Attaching To An Exchange Server Through Windows XP Submitted By: BrienPosey, Posted On: 6/4/2002 7:09:27 AM Description: This week, someone posted a question in the discussion forum stating that they had recently added two Windows XP machines to their network, and that the users were unable to access their Exchange mail through Outlook on these machines. He went on to say that the problem wasn't related to insufficient permissions because the same users were able to login and check E-mail on other machines. I've actually heard about quite a few people having this and similar problems with Windows XP. The good news is that the problem isn't linked to any type of known bug. I've been all over the Internet and have been unable to locate anything related to a Windows XP / Outlook / Exchange bug. Instead, the problem is usually related to either a permissions problem or a configuration problem. The real trick to making Windows XP be able to access Exchange successfully is to verify that the network settings are configured correctly. If you're having trouble connecting to an Exchange server on a machine that you believe to be working correctly, then you should begin the troubleshooting process by opening a Command Prompt window and using the PING command to verify that TCP/IP is working correctly. Begin by pinging your own IP address and the IP address of the Exchange server. If you receive a Destination Path Unreachable message, then it means that TCP/IP is configured incorrectly. Often it means that the machine hasn't acquired an IP address from a DHCP server. If the ping times out, then there is no valid network path between the machine and the Exchange server. Perhaps the network cable is loose. If you can successfully ping the Exchange server by IP address, try pinging it by host name. If this ping fails, then the workstation in question is unaware of the server's host name. You can correct this problem by verifying that the machine is configured to use the same DNS server (or WINS server) as the Exchange server is. If you're still having trouble communicating with the Exchange server and the tests have all been successful up to this point, then its possible that the Windows XP machine may not be a part of the correct domain. Unless the Windows XP machine is a part of a domain that has permissions to the Exchange Server, then the machine will be unable to access the Exchange Server. You can verify domain membership by opening the Control Panel and selecting the Performance and Maintenance link, followed by the System link.When you do, Windows will open the System Properties sheet. Select the Computer Name tab to view the system's computer name and domain membership. If the computer isn't a domain member or if it's part of an incorrect domain, you can use the Change button to change the system's domain membership. Keep in mind that Windows XP is a little bit different than Windows 9x. Windows 9x had minimal security, and it was possible to simply tell Windows to use a specific domain. Windows XP, on the other hand, requires you to create a computer account within the domain before the machine can participate in the domain. Creating a computer account is no big deal, and the wizard that walks you through the domain changing process will help you to set up the computer account. The only catch is that you must have administrative privileges within the domain before you can create a computer account. After joining a domain, you should be able to access your Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: vpn and exchange I have noticed that XP is real picky about that. Recent one, a vender laptop setup and as his domain was not the same as mine, for the exchange server he had to enter'exchange.company.com' instead of just 'exchange'. (We have a DNS entry aliasing 'exchange' to our bridgehead server) See if you can ping the server by name, if you can't, then add it in a HOSTS or LMHOSTS file. -sp -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: vpn and exchange Yes it has to be from the same
RE: Admin for the list?
I hope he is not complaining on you Steve :) -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Admin for the list? Look where you subscribed and you'll find all sorts of contacts. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Admin for the list? Is there an actual admin addy for this address? I can not find anything on the site as to who actually maintains this. I need to talk to someone about a particular issue. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OALGen encountered error [0x8004010f] while calculating the O ALs.
Zetafax? This article suits your problem. Check it out. http://www.equisys.com/teknotes/ztn1167.htm Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-4501 1120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 -Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OALGen encountered error [0x8004010f] while calculating the OALs. Has anybody seen this error message? OALGen encountered error [0x8004010f] while calculating the OALs. For some reason my E2K server is unable to generate the Offline Address List and as a result none of my laptop users with offline folders can download the list, which is causing them grief. I ready a Q article about public folder permissions, but that did not do anything for my problem. Any input would be welcome. Mike List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: For Kevin Miller
Title: Message Please contact Jim Schwartz J -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Well, where are these high paying jobs at. I'm underpaid! I want some of that cheese! :o) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Like I said. I've seen contracts for a whole hell of a lot more than that. I think the largest I've seen was $525 an hour plus expenses. If you were talking salary then 150hrx hours x 52 weeks = $312,000.00. Add in about 45% for benefits and taxes = $452,400.00 in salary costs. Not worth that. No offense to Don or anyone else. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I am not cheap. I wasn't talking about Don's worth. I was talking about your authority to hire him or somebody like him. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller You're cheap. [1] [2] [1] Chorus: But not easy! [2] For someone like Don, who I KNOW has the experience $150 an hour would be a bargain. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Something wrong with charging $150 an hour? That's my usual going rate... :o) -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Then you must be having authority to pay $150/hour as well. That's what Kevin said, he will be charging J -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller And those of us with hiring authority do make it a practice to look into these lists and decide who is an idiot, who is new and trying to learn and who knows how to fix broke a$$ sh!t. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I have a great sense of humour provided someone works for a cert instead of this cramming crap, taking a test, and calling yourself certified. Too many paper MCSE's out there and those paper MCSE's don't know their a$$ from a hole in the ground. -Original Message- From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller someone leave their sense of humor at home today? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller You can keep thinking that... Just pray you never apply for a job that I'm hiring for. Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller It never matters HOW you get certified, as long as you ARE certified. Sheesh -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller We, unlike you, didn't/don't use CRAM sites. We actually use real world knowledge that we've learned over the years... -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller what cram site did you guys use ;) ? -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 13:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I got him certified in UCC+WCA. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:08 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: For Kevin Miller Subject: For Kevin Miller Would you mind enlightening us on what all that crap is after your name? Is that just a jab at the certified world, or are those real? I can not find anything on them in Google. (I had 2 minutes to spare to look) TIA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: a mistake was made
ISSCAN? May not happen before everybody reads though! Check it out for yourself. http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q224493 -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:a mistake was made Outlook 98. exchange 5.5 sp4 User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake. The Recall Message action feature did not work very well on this. This was very sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before too many people read it. What can I do? Thanks in advance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: a mistake was made
http://www.mvps.org/exchange/Exmerge.htm -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: a mistake was made where do I find exmerge. we have never used it? -Original Message- From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 05 June, 2002 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: a mistake was made exmerge to pull it out of internal mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: a mistake was made Outlook 98. exchange 5.5 sp4 User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake. The Recall Message action feature did not work very well on this. This was very sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before too many people read it. What can I do? Thanks in advance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: a mistake was made
http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch55/utility/q224493/nt4alpha/en-us/ilo veyouhlpi.zip -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: a mistake was made where do I find exmerge. we have never used it? -Original Message- From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 05 June, 2002 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: a mistake was made exmerge to pull it out of internal mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: a mistake was made Outlook 98. exchange 5.5 sp4 User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake. The Recall Message action feature did not work very well on this. This was very sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before too many people read it. What can I do? Thanks in advance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: For Kevin Miller
Title: Message Then you must be having authority to pay $150/hour as well. Thats what Kevin said, he will be charging J -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller And those of us with hiring authority do make it a practice to look into these lists and decide who is an idiot, who is new and trying to learn and who knows how to fix broke a$$ sh!t. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I have a great sense of humour provided someone works for a cert instead of this cramming crap, taking a test, and calling yourself certified. Too many paper MCSE's out there and those paper MCSE's don't know their a$$ from a hole in the ground. -Original Message- From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller someone leave their sense of humor at home today? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller You can keep thinking that... Just pray you never apply for a job that I'm hiring for. Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller It never matters HOW you get certified, as long as you ARE certified. Sheesh -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller We, unlike you, didn't/don't use CRAM sites. We actually use real world knowledge that we've learned over the years... -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller what cram site did you guys use ;) ? -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 13:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I got him certified in UCC+WCA. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:08 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: For Kevin Miller Subject: For Kevin Miller Would you mind enlightening us on what all that crap is after your name? Is that just a jab at the certified world, or are those real? I can not find anything on them in Google. (I had 2 minutes to spare to look) TIA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. ==
RE: For Kevin Miller
Title: Message I am not cheap. I wasnt talking about Dons worth. I was talking about your authority to hire him or somebody like him. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller You're cheap. [1] [2] [1] Chorus: But not easy! [2] For someone like Don, who I KNOW has the experience $150 an hour would be a bargain. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Something wrong with charging $150 an hour? That's my usual going rate... :o) -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Then you must be having authority to pay $150/hour as well. That's what Kevin said, he will be charging J -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller And those of us with hiring authority do make it a practice to look into these lists and decide who is an idiot, who is new and trying to learn and who knows how to fix broke a$$ sh!t. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I have a great sense of humour provided someone works for a cert instead of this cramming crap, taking a test, and calling yourself certified. Too many paper MCSE's out there and those paper MCSE's don't know their a$$ from a hole in the ground. -Original Message- From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller someone leave their sense of humor at home today? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller You can keep thinking that... Just pray you never apply for a job that I'm hiring for. Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller It never matters HOW you get certified, as long as you ARE certified. Sheesh -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller We, unlike you, didn't/don't use CRAM sites. We actually use real world knowledge that we've learned over the years... -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller what cram site did you guys use ;) ? -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 13:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I got him certified in UCC+WCA. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:08 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: For Kevin Miller Subject: For Kevin Miller Would you mind enlightening us on what all that crap is after your name? Is that just a jab at the certified world, or are those real? I can not find anything on them in Google. (I had 2 minutes to spare to look) TIA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Archives
Archive your email to a .pst file on to your local hard disk. Then File -open-personal folders file and you will see the archived mails on your outlook. -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:PST Archives Ok, so I have 5000 emails in my exchange mailbox on the server. I want to cut this down. In fact I want to take 90% of it, and archive it. But the thing is, I reference back to these emails every now and then, and to unarchive it and import it everytime would be a pain to access an email. Is there a way to create another folder/mailbox within the exchange client, that would hold the emails of the arvhive, but locally so they didn't take up space on the server? Archive folders? How do you do this? Thanks, paul green seattle --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Backup
I guess so. Yes! your question is loaded. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Backup Hmmm, sounds a little skeptic...are you implying easier said than done? (Being far from an exchange expert here) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Backup You'll want to join the existing site. I'd love to hear your overall plan. :o) William -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Backup Server in case of failure on the main exchange server -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Backup Depends on your needs. Wait... A backup server? Like a recovery server? -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Backup If installing a backup exchange server, should I place in same site or create a different site? (exch 5.5) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oh man you are kidding...
My grand old man never used Outlook. His machine got infected with KLEZ. Let's not bark at the same tree, just because we like to bark at it! -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Oh man you are kidding... I agree with you in all points. I just don't see a reason why tossing Outlook now that it, as you mentioned, has been greatly improved to stop such automated script execution attacks. Interesting enough KLEZ uses a completely new algorithm to spread itself. It harvests e-mail addresses out of the browser local temporary Internet file cache and sends e-mails with faked originator addresses using it's own SMTP engine. How would it help to toss Outlook to get around KLEZ? I am just awaiting the first .EXE viruses designed to infect a *NIX machine by using the same algorithm KLEZ uses (harvesting e-mail addresses from temporary files) and send them via it's own SMTP engine. Anybody knows how to program that? Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oh man you are kidding... And once again the convenience vs. security debate is launched. The downside of Outlook was it's ability to execute some script attacks from the preview pane. This is solved somewhat in later versions and patches. And is defeated through a percentage of end-users inability to control their double-click. ANY OS that has file execution associations can be hit by a virus. Both KDE and GNOME are building this functionality into their interface and as such will also be subject to this kind of attack. It is more effectively solved by preventing the executable type files from passing through your server in the first place. If someone wants to email an executable, they can zip it. At least then it is a two stage process for infection and the local desktop anti-virus sw has a shot at the new virus that your Exchange servers anti-virus missed. Even if an end user is infected (floppy, etc) they mail bomb's their own email box as the server refuses to send those attachment types internally as well. I have yet to see a legitimate reason to email an scr file in a corporate environment. :) If it is vbs or js, then the developer can rename it as txt and assume that the recipient can rename it to vbs or js. As to alternative's to Outlook in asked about in another message. You can use Eudora, Netscape Mail, Pine, etc (POP3 or IMAP).. You just LOSE the Email/Calendaring integration function which is the primary appeal of the Exchange server in a business environment. Of course, I am aware of a company that has an Exchange server and uses Outlook Express!? -sp -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oh man you are kidding... It is what happens when people insist on using Outlook as their MUA. BS! You can get any type of virus if you open a mail and execute an attached file. Siegfried / List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
If you have any health problems after that, please contact Dr.Milton R. Dogg of Dogg foundation!!. Kevin knows who it is! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Great, there goes my budget for the month Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? I am a Technology Whore. Add that to all my Bio's. Unless here I am just slut, as these lists are for free. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? We'll, someone last week said all consultants were prostitutes so somebody better bring lots of quarters ;) Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Hookers and beer for everyone!! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? I've got you all beat - I'll bring live entertainment. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Not mine... I give them live demonstrations... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man, is that just typical for the execs? -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: 16 GB Limit? It did at a company I used to work for...They approved a P.O. for Enterprise that that they had been sitting on for 3 months right away :) Jay Personette -Original Message- From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I understand before a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a screeching halt? Yes or no? Thanks, Sherry I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan. There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private information store and public information store in the Exchange Standard version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? MSExchangeIS Private? Storage Limits? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? GB, not MB. There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the
RE: 16 GB Limit?
Title: Message William, You wouldn't forget anything eh? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Mgmt is real big on my being able to run off-line defrag regularly Yes, we've already discussed at length the complete waste of time this is. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB Limit? He he. I'm actually going to enjoy this meeting.I'm going to enjoy saying "I been telling you this was going to happen, na na na na na". Okay, I probably won't say it exactly like that, but I will enjoy it! My off-line defrag this past weekend gained me nada, zippo, zilch, zero. The stripe set it's on is a total of 25 GB, the IS is @ 12.6 growing, if I can get drives for this server is a big IF, so far I've found none (Compaq 1850R), Exchange Enterprise 5.5 is unavailable that I've found for purchase. Looks like I get a new/second Exchange server out of this deal. Mgmt is real big on my being able to run off-line defrag regularly and/or isinteg if there is database corruption, I'm at the point that I can't do that easily or quickly, of course that's the other part of what they want, it must be quick. Sooo, I've configured a nice little Compaq ML530 with dual processors, 2 GB ram 6 18 GB drives.I'm going to enjoy playing with my new server :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Yes. Absolutely. From Paul Robichaux's Managing Exchange Server 5.5: "If you're running the Standard Edition of Exchange, and your public or private IS is very close to the 16GB limit, the IS will shut down instead of growing beyond that limit. If this happens, do an off-line defragmentation of the database (see Chapter 17 for details) to reclaim the database whitespace, then restart the IS. If the database is already compacted, then you may have to consider upgrading to Enterprise Edition to get the store to start." -Original Message- From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I understand before a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a screeching halt? Yes or no? Thanks, Sherry I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan. There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private information store and public information store in the Exchange Standard version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?MSExchangeIS Private? Storage Limits? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? GB, not MB. There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the priv.edb and pub.edb. The online maintenance that runs each night will report the database information to the application event log. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?It is agreed that the limit is 16MB. How is that determined? Through the aggregate size of the mailboxes and private folders? Or the size of the Priv and Pub? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 16 GB Limit?Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. Am I right? If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5? John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: 16 GB Limit?
I don't see this gentleman Scott Shnoll on this list any more. But he posted this some time back. I have printed this and stuck it on my exchange server, so that I don't miss any of these! This has kept me trouble free so far. Mal There is a lot more to maintaining Exchange than applying service packs. You should also regularly review your event logs (daily, if not more frequently). There are some good tools out there that can automate this for you. You should also regularly collect and monitor performance data. You also need to watch mail queues for build-up, verify that your Exchange-aware antivirus software is working and keeping up-to-date, monitor disk space, and perform a whole other slew of tasks that combine to form your Exchange maintenance practices. Don't think for a minute that applying service packs is all you need to do to keep your servers up longer. There are lots of other factors that affect uptime and availability and they should not be overlooked. My $.02. -Scott -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? No. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry for highjacking the thread, but is there any maintenance other than backups, event log, and IS size monitoring that really needs to be done on a regular basis? John Majetic -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Mgmt is real big on my being able to run off-line defrag regularly Yes, we've already discussed at length the complete waste of time this is. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? He he. I'm actually going to enjoy this meeting.I'm going to enjoy saying I been telling you this was going to happen, na na na na na. Okay, I probably won't say it exactly like that, but I will enjoy it! My off-line defrag this past weekend gained me nada, zippo, zilch, zero. The stripe set it's on is a total of 25 GB, the IS is @ 12.6 growing, if I can get drives for this server is a big IF, so far I've found none (Compaq 1850R), Exchange Enterprise 5.5 is unavailable that I've found for purchase. Looks like I get a new/second Exchange server out of this deal. Mgmt is real big on my being able to run off-line defrag regularly and/or isinteg if there is database corruption, I'm at the point that I can't do that easily or quickly, of course that's the other part of what they want, it must be quick. Sooo, I've configured a nice little Compaq ML530 with dual processors, 2 GB ram 6 18 GB drives.I'm going to enjoy playing with my new server :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Yes. Absolutely. From Paul Robichaux's Managing Exchange Server 5.5: If you're running the Standard Edition of Exchange, and your public or private IS is very close to the 16GB limit, the IS will shut down instead of growing beyond that limit. If this happens, do an off-line defragmentation of the database (see Chapter 17 for details) to reclaim the database whitespace, then restart the IS. If the database is already compacted, then you may have to consider upgrading to Enterprise Edition to get the store to start. -Original Message- From: Sherry Abercrombie [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I understand before a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a screeching halt? Yes or no? Thanks, Sherry I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan. There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private information store and public information store in the Exchange Standard version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? MSExchangeIS Private? Storage Limits? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin
RE: RE : Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of C alend ars)
or 100,000 Afghani which is roughly a dollar. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE : Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of C alend ars) or 12 Euros. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE : Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of C alend ars) 0 francs. 0 pounds. 0 dollars. -Original Message- From: Gerard Dumazet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 09:38 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE : Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of Calend ars) How much you sell it ? (Calsync) -Message d'origine- De : Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoye : jeudi 16 mai 2002 10:51 A : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : RE: Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of Calend ars) John, There is a product from MS which allows you to view multiple Calendars on a web page - that's what William was alluding to. Look here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?url=/downloads/sample.as p?ur l=/msdn-files/027/001/831/msdncompositedoc.xml I've also developed something called Calsync which allows you to put all Calendars that you want to view into a Public Folder. Kevin -Original Message- From: John Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 08:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of Calend ars) Hi William Many thanks for your reply. We probably are adverse to 3rd Party products but we would like to what might be available especially if you could point us at an example web site or send a screen-dump - but please don't spend any time on this matter. Thanks again John -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 05:48 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of Calendars) I have seen the results of this rendered to a webpage (like the free/busy info), but still administered in Outlook with multiple accounts. The coders among us might have a solution or two. Are you adverse to third party products? William -Original Message- From: John Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calendar of Calendars) Hello Exchange Group Many thanks for all your contributions and responses in such a varied group of activities! We have a question regarding the practical application of Exchange 5.5 in 'viewing of multiple calendars' Scenario: We have 7 members of Staff each with their own account in Exchange. Each of the 7 want to be able to view the other 6 diaries plus their own, in one consolidated window in the format of a 'diary of diaries'. We can share diaries of course, but that means clicking each diary in turn, rather than seeing one over-all schedule for the office. We could use the meeting request format, but we are looking at a day by day (or more granular) availability and that would dramatically increase traffic overhead, with no real solution. We can create a public diary where either only available dates / times are held or not-available dates / times are held. But neither of these really work and by the time 7, 8, 9 users names are added the whole window becomes very congested. We can't believe that corporations with 100+ department people who have colleagues scheduling their dates for them would only use individual Exchange accounts... Has anyone come across any form of a solution that might assist? Regards, John Armstrong Edinburgh, Scotland. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward to external email account
Title: Message CRprperties advanced and hide. [Mal Sasalu] -Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward to external email account Thanks to both of you. Can the CR be hidden fron the GAL? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward to external email account Do not use the Outlook rule. Rather go into Exchange Admin, open the properties of this mailbox and under delivery options select the CR as an alternate recipient. William -Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Forward to external email account Ok know this has been covered here in the past but I cannot find it today. I have: Set up a Custom Recipient with the address of my personal account. Set up a rule in Outlook 2000 to forward all messages to the CR. Message does not arrive in personal account. If I send directly to the CR the message does go through. Until know I have bee able to resist doing this but now have been told that I need to set it up for a user and I'm using myself to test first. Exch 5.5 SP4 NT4 sp6 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
look in the outlook tools-options-prferences-email options-when forwarding a message and when reply toa messge- - - - - - -settings. Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4501 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-4914 1120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 -Original Message-From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Question Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they "appear" to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Keeping large PST's open
Title: Message He is roaring Kevin. Allow him to be what he is just for today! seems to be his day! Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4501 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-4914 1120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Keeping large PST's open Are you ok?? --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Keeping large PST's open Ummm... PST's burned to a CD are not accessible due to the "Read Only" attribute. As for your 5 year storage requirement, that is what tape backups are for. We're required to keep 7 years worth of mail for the FDA and SEC, we don't nor will we ever use PST's, not to mention, I won't support them. That's what a backup strategy is for. 30mb for a storage limit might work for you, but it certainly doesn't work for every one. The other side of this coin is SIS, otherwise known as Single Instance Storage. Exchange works wonders with this feature, you should read up on it. In addition, disk space is cheap, feed your Exchange server some of that disk space on the SAN and you'll be a happier admin. 5GB is definitely not the norm for mailboxes, Kevin is a case in his own there. My mailbox is a whoppin 500mb, but it doesn't even compare to the 2GB my CFO has and I'm not going to complain to him about it since I have a rather large RAID array that will support larger mailboxes. PST's actually use more disk space than the Exchange IS. I believe the ratio is something like 1.2:1. In addition to that, PST's can degrade PC performance dramatically due to memory usage. In short, what's good for the goose is not good for the gander. While your solution might work for you, it is not one I would ever advocate nor would I find it acceptable... Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Keeping large PST's open Working at a college, I see a wide range of users. Some users are required by the state or grant institiution to hold onto all correspondese for a "project" for 5 years. We estiblished "reseanable" (30 meg) limits on their mailboxes (IS) and expect them to keep them clean. This means that they can't hold e-mail there for 5 years. (who would want to anyway?) While PSTs and OSTs may not be the best idea (yes I know all about their issues), they are a storage type we can provide. Opening the limits on the IS for 5 gig folders like Kevins would be impossible. Our people just will abuse that sort of limit. they would never delete anything! My bosses, andI agree, that a 30 meg limit is more then acceptable limit for amailbox via Exchange. We store the PSTs on the file server (which is on a SANS) and they are backed up. When the psts get around 650 megs in size, I burn it to a cd and have them start a new one. I copy the cd version on to the hdd but leave it in read-only attribute so they can't add to it but can access the info. (remember in our case, the e-mails and attachments may need to be "held" for several years) They use the "new" PST on the server for storing info. I actually only have 2 usuers who have required this. A few have gotten to 300 megs then clean it up on their own because they find they can't find anything. We only allow 1 PST on the server per user at a time... Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Keeping large PST's open
Title: Message He says pst's are in her home directory. So it should be on the network. It is a valid concern. It would have been better if it was on local machie. Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4501 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-4914 1120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 -Original Message-From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Keeping large PST's open This does not use up network resources assuming the pst is on her local hard drive. As long as the user understands that local drives are not backed up, and that if the file is lost its gone forever, it should not be a problem. -Original Message-From: Bill Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Keeping large PST's open I have a user that keeps her mail in seevral large pst's in her home directory then open's them as personal folders in Outllook. I looked at her files and she has almost 350 Mb of PST's. In the past users have been allowed to have a 100mb limit on thier exchange mailbox, which should be plenty if it is not used as a filling system. As a new administrator I feel un-easy about her doing this, and she is showing evryone she runs into how to do it also. It seems to me like this will eat a huge amount of Network resources. Any opnions?List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Keeping large PST's open
By putting it on CD's she will loose the ability to read the mails. She will have to save it to the disk before reading it. Mal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Keeping large PST's open Why not put those large PST's on a CD for her ? Seems like the best solution to me. - Mark S. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 22, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Keeping large PST's open She is opening them across the network? I think opening them locally is much better. Helps minimize corruption potential and of course uses less network resources. I prefer to keep them local and back them up to the network as needed. They are archives and dashboard development files mostly. -Original Message- From: Bill Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Keeping large PST's open I have a user that keeps her mail in seevral large pst's in her home directory then open's them as personal folders in Outllook. I looked at her files and she has almost 350 Mb of PST's. In the past users have been allowed to have a 100mb limit on thier exchange mailbox, which should be plenty if it is not used as a filling system. As a new administrator I feel un-easy about her doing this, and she is showing evryone she runs into how to do it also. It seems to me like this will eat a huge amount of Network resources. Any opnions? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Esutil/Isinteg
Here are excerpts of postings from people who know exchange very well. Print this out and give it to the guys who are pestering you with the idea of using eseutil on a regular basis. Mal If you are running out of disk space AND there is no whitespace in the database, as indicated by Event ID 1221 in the application event log, then running eseutil will net you NOTHING. If he stops the online maintenance that runs at night by default, I would remove him from the duties of administering the Exchange Server at least until he reads all the whitepapers again. I am not kidding. He is right that we don't want maintenance during primary periods of usage. Allowing online maintenance its nightly window is best. NTBackup does back up the whitespace. The additional time is negligible. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP Use it only when it's needed. It is run regularly only by misinformed admins that: 1) consider their email content and server non-critical. 2) do not need email to be available to their users 24/7. 3) enjoy playing with the cleaning people on the IT chesterfield. William I run it because that is the ONLY way to regain space in the Exchange DB that has been freed up by messages being deleted etc. If I did not do this on a regular basis I would hit the Exchange 5.5 IS limit. 1) That logic is so flawed I can smell it from here. (Forgive me if I'm wrong, Sherry, but aren't you the one that recovers the SAME 450MB every month or was that someone else?) That might have been someone else. It is simply NOT correct. The database doesn't perpetually grow if there is unused whitespace. it doesn't work in 5.5 when you try to redirect the temp database, it must run on the same physical drive that it is stored. 2) That is also incorrect. Have a look at eseutil /? (which in my opinion is the only switch you should be running eseutil with). Do be aware that the speed of this process over the network will be significantly slower than if the temp database was local. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ Only use it if you are directed to by PSS, or if you are using the standard edition of Exchange 5.5 and are running into the 16GB limit. Exchange handles online defrag quite well so there should be no need to run and offline defrag unless you are running into the 16GB limit on Standard Edition. Not to use! Don ely -Original Message- From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Eseutil So what is the best practice with defragmentation? MS says that ESEUITL is not considered a tool for regular maintenance and should only be used in case of emergency after contacting Microsoft Technical Support. On the other hand, there're people here that use it on monthly basis! So, to use or not to use? most the people here who use it on a monthly basis would have a very difficult time explaining what the log files are, what they are used for, and why they are there. don't go by them. Listen to people who know what they are talking about. DON'T TOUCH eseutil unless you are on the phone with PSS or know what you are doing and have a very good backup. The best maintance for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done. The longer a server is up the better. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes In 5.5 priv.edb will not decrease in size unless you run the ESEUTIL. On a small drive like mine that's a major issue, and we run ESEUTIL once a month to recover space. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes Read the event log, See what the online defrags tell you you have for white space. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Douglas Hull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes I have built a 2nd Exchange server for my site as my primary server is running out of disk space. I have been moving mailboxes across to the new server as well as getting users to delete and archive as much as possible, however the size of my PRIV.edb file on primary server does not seem to be decreasing! It is approaching 16GB
RE: Esutil/Isinteg
Thank you. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg WOW! Thanks very much. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Here are excerpts of postings from people who know exchange very well. Print this out and give it to the guys who are pestering you with the idea of using eseutil on a regular basis. Mal If you are running out of disk space AND there is no whitespace in the database, as indicated by Event ID 1221 in the application event log, then running eseutil will net you NOTHING. If he stops the online maintenance that runs at night by default, I would remove him from the duties of administering the Exchange Server at least until he reads all the whitepapers again. I am not kidding. He is right that we don't want maintenance during primary periods of usage. Allowing online maintenance its nightly window is best. NTBackup does back up the whitespace. The additional time is negligible. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP Use it only when it's needed. It is run regularly only by misinformed admins that: 1) consider their email content and server non-critical. 2) do not need email to be available to their users 24/7. 3) enjoy playing with the cleaning people on the IT chesterfield. William I run it because that is the ONLY way to regain space in the Exchange DB that has been freed up by messages being deleted etc. If I did not do this on a regular basis I would hit the Exchange 5.5 IS limit. 1) That logic is so flawed I can smell it from here. (Forgive me if I'm wrong, Sherry, but aren't you the one that recovers the SAME 450MB every month or was that someone else?) That might have been someone else. It is simply NOT correct. The database doesn't perpetually grow if there is unused whitespace. it doesn't work in 5.5 when you try to redirect the temp database, it must run on the same physical drive that it is stored. 2) That is also incorrect. Have a look at eseutil /? (which in my opinion is the only switch you should be running eseutil with). Do be aware that the speed of this process over the network will be significantly slower than if the temp database was local. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ Only use it if you are directed to by PSS, or if you are using the standard edition of Exchange 5.5 and are running into the 16GB limit. Exchange handles online defrag quite well so there should be no need to run and offline defrag unless you are running into the 16GB limit on Standard Edition. Not to use! Don ely -Original Message- From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Eseutil So what is the best practice with defragmentation? MS says that ESEUITL is not considered a tool for regular maintenance and should only be used in case of emergency after contacting Microsoft Technical Support. On the other hand, there're people here that use it on monthly basis! So, to use or not to use? most the people here who use it on a monthly basis would have a very difficult time explaining what the log files are, what they are used for, and why they are there. don't go by them. Listen to people who know what they are talking about. DON'T TOUCH eseutil unless you are on the phone with PSS or know what you are doing and have a very good backup. The best maintance for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done. The longer a server is up the better. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes In 5.5 priv.edb will not decrease in size unless you run the ESEUTIL. On a small drive like mine that's a major issue, and we run ESEUTIL once a month to recover space. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes Read the event log, See what the online defrags tell you you have for white space. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Douglas Hull [mailto
RE: Esutil/Isinteg
She heard it Kevin- - - loud and clear :). Mal -Original Message- From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Okay I will quote you on that -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Just tell them Mal, William, Kevin and Don say it is a bad idea. What more do they need? Look at me I have 70 gigs of white space in my priv and I fear running eseutil so much I am not going to run it. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Thanks for everyone's response, now if I can just convince the powers that be. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Thank you. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg WOW! Thanks very much. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Here are excerpts of postings from people who know exchange very well. Print this out and give it to the guys who are pestering you with the idea of using eseutil on a regular basis. Mal If you are running out of disk space AND there is no whitespace in the database, as indicated by Event ID 1221 in the application event log, then running eseutil will net you NOTHING. If he stops the online maintenance that runs at night by default, I would remove him from the duties of administering the Exchange Server at least until he reads all the whitepapers again. I am not kidding. He is right that we don't want maintenance during primary periods of usage. Allowing online maintenance its nightly window is best. NTBackup does back up the whitespace. The additional time is negligible. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP Use it only when it's needed. It is run regularly only by misinformed admins that: 1) consider their email content and server non-critical. 2) do not need email to be available to their users 24/7. 3) enjoy playing with the cleaning people on the IT chesterfield. William I run it because that is the ONLY way to regain space in the Exchange DB that has been freed up by messages being deleted etc. If I did not do this on a regular basis I would hit the Exchange 5.5 IS limit. 1) That logic is so flawed I can smell it from here. (Forgive me if I'm wrong, Sherry, but aren't you the one that recovers the SAME 450MB every month or was that someone else?) That might have been someone else. It is simply NOT correct. The database doesn't perpetually grow if there is unused whitespace. it doesn't work in 5.5 when you try to redirect the temp database, it must run on the same physical drive that it is stored. 2) That is also incorrect. Have a look at eseutil /? (which in my opinion is the only switch you should be running eseutil with). Do be aware that the speed of this process over the network will be significantly slower than if the temp database was local. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ Only use it if you are directed to by PSS, or if you are using the standard edition of Exchange 5.5 and are running into the 16GB limit. Exchange handles online defrag quite well so there should be no need to run and offline defrag unless you are running into the 16GB limit on Standard Edition. Not to use! Don ely -Original Message- From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Eseutil So what is the best practice with defragmentation? MS says that ESEUITL is not considered a tool for regular maintenance and should only be used in case of emergency after contacting Microsoft Technical Support. On the other hand, there're people here that use it on monthly basis! So, to use or not to use? most the people here who use it on a monthly basis would have a very difficult time explaining what the log files are, what they are used for, and why they are there. don't go by them. Listen to people who know what they are talking about. DON'T TOUCH eseutil unless you are on the phone with PSS or know what you are doing and have a very good backup. The best maintance for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done. The longer a server is up the better
RE: Esutil/Isinteg
Why do you want to use those tools? Any particular reason? -Original Message- From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Sorry I must have missed that message, guess I'll be using scripts. I was hoping for more feedback on not using Eseutil and Isinteg regularly. Anyone have any good references on these topics? Julie -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Esutil/Isinteg Siegfried Weber posted earlier today with an example of coding a store dismount: Right to the point and as it turns out I wrote a little demo script back in Sept 2001 which shows how to mount/dismount stores with CDOEXM which is avail at http://www.cdolive.net/download/cdoutilities.zip; Siegfried / As with 5.5, running those utilities do little to nothing to benefit a healthy exchange server installation. William -Original Message- From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Esutil/Isinteg Testing Win2K SP2 /E2K SP2. Routinely ran the Eseutil /d and Isinteg -fix -alltests on my Exchange 5.5 server. (long story) Does anyone have suggestions or comments about doing the same with Exchange 2000, from research I have done this doesn't appear to be a good idea but I need more to go on. Also is there a command to dismount a store from the command line? Thanks Julie Lienemann Information Services Colorado School of Mines [EMAIL PROTECTED] (303) 273-3877 (303) 324-2881 Cell List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox
you need to set up the server side rule from the Rules wizard. It is pretty straight forward Mal -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox Group, I need to have mail recieved from a specific e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent to a specific user mailbox in my organization. Is this possible and if so any guidance would be much appreciated. Scott Oliver Liz Claiborne Shoes Computer Operations Supervisor Microsoft Exchange Administrator (904) 279-8367 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox
Title: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox Probably he means to say, irrespective of recepient to whom it is addressed in the organization,mail should be redirected to a particular mailbox. which means the mail may be sent to several addresses from one particular address, but it should still be redirected to the particular mailbox. May be - - - -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox This is accomplished through the Outlook. Go to tools, rules wizard. Jacqueline -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox I assume this would be done through Exchange Admin. I am not sure where the rules wizrd is found here. What I need is for the server to deliver all of these e-mail to the specified mailbox. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox you need to set up the server side rule from the Rules wizard. It is pretty straight forward Mal -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox Group, I need to have mail recieved from a specific e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent to a specific user mailbox in my organization. Is this possible and if so any guidance would be much appreciated. Scott Oliver Liz Claiborne Shoes Computer Operations Supervisor Microsoft Exchange Administrator (904) 279-8367 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox
Title: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox It is simpler thanI thought. Add a contact in outlook with that vendor's email address. use rule wizard and select " mails when they arrive" and next select "from people or distribution list". when it prompts you with the select name dialog box, select the vendor's name from contacts. Add whatever rule you want over and above - -- there you go - Mal -Original Message-From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox Actually, here is the situation. User was let go, mailbox kept active for business purposes. Mail is beeing forwarded to the head hancho for review andI need to have the server catch particular messages from one of our vendors (specified address)and deliver it to the user who needs this.I hope this makes sense. I attempted to do this through Outlook and got an error. -Original Message-From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox Probably he means to say, irrespective of recepient to whom it is addressed in the organization,mail should be redirected to a particular mailbox. which means the mail may be sent to several addresses from one particular address, but it should still be redirected to the particular mailbox. May be - - - -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox This is accomplished through the Outlook. Go to tools, rules wizard. Jacqueline -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox I assume this would be done through Exchange Admin. I am not sure where the rules wizrd is found here. What I need is for the server to deliver all of these e-mail to the specified mailbox. -Original Message----- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox you need to set up the server side rule from the Rules wizard. It is pretty straight forward Mal -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Delivering mail to specified user mailbox Group, I need to have mail recieved from a specific e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent to a specific user mailbox in my organization. Is this possible and if so any guidance would be much appreciated. Scott Oliver Liz Claiborne Shoes Computer Operations Supervisor Microsoft Exchange Administrator (904) 279-8367 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Content Filtering Software - Cameo?
Yesterday William gave us a free software!! Didn't you get one? And just for him: http://www.mailwasher.net/ -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Content Filtering I use Mail Marshal www.marshalsoftware.com and love it. There are also Mail Essentials and Mime Sweeper. cheers Simon -Original Message- From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2002 11:06 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Content Filtering Hi guys, list newbie here. 1st Question - Our CEO has recently asked me to check into content filtering software. Is there an obvious product of choice? Were running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0 with Antigen 6.2 Thanks, Steve --- Steve Hart MCSE, A+ MIS Manager List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -Original Message- From: Matt Dodge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Content Filtering Software - Cameo? We are currently running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and have been having problems with questionable e-mails. I would appreciate any of your thoughts/experiences with content filtering software. We currently own MicroData's Melia Exchange reporting product and I was wondering if anyone had used another product of theirs - Cameo. Cameo is their content filtering software. I am grateful for any information/help. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
all minus one
Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list all but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
Thank you sirs. I got it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one If it is a one time thing, quickly remove the folks from the DL, send the mail, then put em back... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That would be a neat feature, but I've never seen it on Exchange. :o| -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: all minus one Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list all but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
That was cool. Thanks John. Mal -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Never even thought of that - cool! Plus, you could add them as bcc's so that people wouldn't see the other recipients, if required. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: all minus one Wow! Cool!!! -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Thank you sirs. I got it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one If it is a one time thing, quickly remove the folks from the DL, send the mail, then put em back... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That would be a neat feature, but I've never seen it on Exchange. :o| -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: all minus one Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list all but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
I have an other question attached to this. I understand when a mail is sent to a DL, it will be a single instance storage. When you select so many users, will this still be a single instance storage? Thanks Mal -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Never even thought of that - cool! Plus, you could add them as bcc's so that people wouldn't see the other recipients, if required. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: all minus one Wow! Cool!!! -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Thank you sirs. I got it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one If it is a one time thing, quickly remove the folks from the DL, send the mail, then put em back... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That would be a neat feature, but I've never seen it on Exchange. :o| -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: all minus one Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list all but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
Thank you all. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one SIS is retained regardless of the presence of a DL. The DL gets expanded to its individual receipients at the server. William -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one I have an other question attached to this. I understand when a mail is sent to a DL, it will be a single instance storage. When you select so many users, will this still be a single instance storage? Thanks Mal -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Never even thought of that - cool! Plus, you could add them as bcc's so that people wouldn't see the other recipients, if required. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: all minus one Wow! Cool!!! -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
I am glad, you are so nice to me today :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one ::hugs:: -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Thank you all. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one SIS is retained regardless of the presence of a DL. The DL gets expanded to its individual receipients at the server. William -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one I have an other question attached to this. I understand when a mail is sent to a DL, it will be a single instance storage. When you select so many users, will this still be a single instance storage? Thanks Mal -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Never even thought of that - cool! Plus, you could add them as bcc's so that people wouldn't see the other recipients, if required. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: all minus one Wow! Cool!!! -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
Title: Message If you have chosen" modify members " and have enough permissions on the exchange server then you would be removing the users permanently. Instead you should be chosing "Add to" button at the lower level. Also you should check the properties by right clicking of the DL before you move it to Message recepients. I hope I didn't confuse you guys. Mal -Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: all minus one You are not actually removing the names from the list. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: all minus one But, if you remove names from the DL, they are removed from the DL permanently. -Original Message- From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Actually this does work as described but at that point you are not sending to the list anymore. You are using the list to add names to your message. It's a pretty cool trick that I had not tried before. Always cool to learn new things! Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one I don't think so... -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That works? -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Thank you sirs. I got it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one If it is a one time thing, quickly remove the folks from the DL, send the mail, then put em back... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That would be a neat feature, but I've never seen it on Exchange. :o| -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: all minus one Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list "all" but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Huh?
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q190/4/33.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q238/4/44.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q236/9/09.ASP -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA Huh? Does anyone know what this "Your password is set to expire in 0 days" message is? I get it EVERY time a user logs in. How can I get rid of it? TIA List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pst troubles, please help
did you check the attributes on the file? -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help It's not my file, a user who needs his mail(and created his personal folder local rather than to the network share, so there's no backup), I was brought in yesterday when all of a sudden his PC kept locking up when going into Outlook. The pst itself crashes anything that tries to touch it. I've run Scanpst with no luck, it gives me an error 25 minutes after I start it saying I don't have proper permissions on the file. I'm currently seeing what I can do with a backup/restore/redirect. Thanks much for everyone's suggestions. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help Compacted the file recently? Did ScanPST do anything ? -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 22:46 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help Windows Explorer. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help Where do you see the 584megs, inside of Outlook or Windows Explorer ? -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 16:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pst troubles, please help I've got an evil .pst file that won't open now that I've reformatted the PC and recreated the Outlook account. This .pst file is approx. 584MB, not exceeding the 2GB limit... But, it's crashing everything that tries to get to it. When I open the mailbox, after approx. 7 minutes of cranking away at 100%CPU utilization, then I try to open this Personal Folders file, I get a message that I don't have permission to open it. What? I wonder if there's a way to get into this file? I've searched TechNet, Google, my archive of messages from this list. Anyone have a suggestion? Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pst troubles, please help
Might have restored from a CD and forgot to take off the read only. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help If its read only, you should get an error message. -Original Message- From: Tim Boswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help My guess is it's set as read only, or in a folder where the user doesn't have modify access. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 April 2002 18:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help did you check the attributes on the file? -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help It's not my file, a user who needs his mail(and created his personal folder local rather than to the network share, so there's no backup), I was brought in yesterday when all of a sudden his PC kept locking up when going into Outlook. The pst itself crashes anything that tries to touch it. I've run Scanpst with no luck, it gives me an error 25 minutes after I start it saying I don't have proper permissions on the file. I'm currently seeing what I can do with a backup/restore/redirect. Thanks much for everyone's suggestions. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help Compacted the file recently? Did ScanPST do anything ? -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 22:46 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help Windows Explorer. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help Where do you see the 584megs, inside of Outlook or Windows Explorer ? -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 16:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pst troubles, please help I've got an evil .pst file that won't open now that I've reformatted the PC and recreated the Outlook account. This .pst file is approx. 584MB, not exceeding the 2GB limit... But, it's crashing everything that tries to get to it. When I open the mailbox, after approx. 7 minutes of cranking away at 100%CPU utilization, then I try to open this Personal Folders file, I get a message that I don't have permission to open it. What? I wonder if there's a way to get into this file? I've searched TechNet, Google, my archive of messages from this list. Anyone have a suggestion? Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
exchange backup failure
Title: Message Hello All, My exchange backup fails (has happened twice)on a particular mail, with following error. I checked the users mailbox and the particular mail. everything seems to be alright with the mail. It has a word attachment. I checked the history of the file. It exists for last two years and being backed up without fail. I have 54 gigs of mailboxes to backup. it fails after 20 gigs or so. I can get that particular mail deleted and then backup, if that helps. However, it would get ugly if the error points toanothermail fornext failure! we useVeritas netbackup3.4, exhcnage5.5 onNT4.0. Any help is appreciated. 04/02/2002 21:59:20 xena ntsrv004 from client ntsrv004: ERR - failure reading Exchange Mailbox object: Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes:\Sarah Grieve\Top of Information Store\Inbox\mine\I am Scottish) 0xFE2D:FS_OBJECT_CORRUPT 04/02/2002 22:08:57 xena ntsrv004 system call failed - Connection reset by peer (at child.c.863) 04/02/2002 22:08:57 xena ntsrv004 socket read failed: errno = 232 - Connection reset by peer 04/02/2002 22:08:58 xena ntsrv004 could not send server status message 04/02/2002 22:08:58 xena ntsrv004 unable to perform read from client socket, connection may have been broken 04/02/2002 22:08:58 xena ntsrv004 Could not set linger value on socket. Errno = 22: Invalid argument 04/02/2002 22:10:20 xena ntsrv004 backup of client ntsrv004 exited with status Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchange backup failure
Title: Message I am sorry I was drawn for some other work. We are not doing BLB's. Neither it is the media error. Usually media error thorws up an error 83. The netbackup is missing a patch. this problems is addressed in the follwing link. http://seer.support.veritas.com/search_forms/SearchFrame.asp?SearchTerm=exchangePath=seer%2Esupport%2Everitas%2Ecom%2Fdocs%2F242871%2EhtmSearchArea=AllShowSearch=ProductVersion=Subject=ddOS=CiScope=%2FDOCS%2FCiRestriction=exchange+%26+%40fcode+NETBACKUPDCddProduct=NETBACKUPDCDocTitle=SrchPageID=techsearch%2Easprc=10 Thanks for all the help. Mal -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange backup failure Or if you're using BLB's, you're backups are CRAP. ;o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange backup failure Heres a hint. If it aint Scottish, Its CRAP! -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange backup failure It's not the tape. Guess again... -Original Message-From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange backup failure what service packs ? Is the tape bad ? -Original Message-From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 16:04To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exchange backup failure Hello All, My exchange backup fails (has happened twice)on a particular mail, with following error. I checked the users mailbox and the particular mail. everything seems to be alright with the mail. It has a word attachment. I checked the history of the file. It exists for last two years and being backed up without fail. I have 54 gigs of mailboxes to backup. it fails after 20 gigs or so. I can get that particular mail deleted and then backup, if that helps. However, it would get ugly if the error points toanothermail fornext failure! we useVeritas netbackup3.4, exhcnage5.5 onNT4.0. Any help is appreciated. 04/02/2002 21:59:20 xena ntsrv004 from client ntsrv004: ERR - failure reading Exchange Mailbox object: Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes:\Sarah Grieve\Top of Information Store\Inbox\mine\I am Scottish) 0xFE2D:FS_OBJECT_CORRUPT 04/02/2002 22:08:57 xena ntsrv004 system call failed - Connection reset by peer (at child.c.863) 04/02/2002 22:08:57 xena ntsrv004 socket read failed: errno = 232 - Connection reset by peer 04/02/2002 22:08:58 xena ntsrv004 could not send server status message 04/02/2002 22:08:58 xena ntsrv004 unable to perform read from client socket, connection may have been broken 04/02/2002 22:08:58 xena ntsrv004 Could not set linger value on socket. Errno = 22: Invalid argument 04/02/2002 22:10:20 xena ntsrv004 backup of client ntsrv004 exited with status Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward Internet E-Mail
Add your name to the contact list with your AOL or whatever private email address. From rules wizard in outlook set the rule (server side rule) to forward the mails to your name in contacts. Mal -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forward Internet E-Mail I wouldn't recommend it if AOL is the destination. Otherwise, you a custom recipient. (mail-anabled contact in E2K) Section 3.32: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm William -Original Message- From: John Theed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward Internet E-Mail Is it possible to have your incoming e-mail on an Exchange Server V5.5 forwarded to your separate internet account and have this done by the server? For example, I receive In Company and Internet mail via our exchange server. I am going to be gone for 2 weeks and do not have dial-in access to get my e-mail, however, I have another internet account on say AOL. Can I have the server forward ALL of my E-Mail to my AOL account and if so, can someone point me in the right direction. Thanks John List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Recomendation: Fax solution
Title: Message This can't be a coincidence! or can this be? -Original Message-From: Nash, James A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Recomendation: Fax solution Stu and Don gave the exact same response. Could they possibly be the same person? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Recomendation: Fax solution Been talked about with extreme regularity... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec4.htm Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Recomendation: Fax solution I have searched the archives for info, and based upon those results: I believe the following meet our criteria. Can anyone recommend any of the following based upon actual use? msXFax-Lite for Exchange FAXMaker for Exchange Zetafax NET SatisFAXtion Gold-Fax Server for Small Workgroups TIA Chris Bodnar Network Engineer Essent Corporation 610-559- X:24List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
If you have not had any performance issues, then you just let it work(i think). My exchange is up for last 11 months, without a reboot! -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q I cold-boot my entire network once a month.. it works wonders for network stability. Thanks! Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange server reboot simple q Just curious-- how often do people reboot their exchange servers? Or do you? Our exchange server has been up for 7 months straight now w/o a reboot. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to reboot it every now and then-- free up any memory leakages, etc.. Is it necessary, or can I let it just keep chugging away until it is necessary? Any input, thoughts, etc. would be great. Thanks. paul green seattle --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
Title: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q What "needs and concerns"? Doesn't that " needs and concerns " translate to instability? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q I disagree. Stating that a monthly reboot shows signs of instability is not a sound statement. It depends on your needs and concerns. If he said on a weekly basis, I would agree... -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q Do you have proof that is does anything? --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Beasley, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q We reboot to clear memory on a biweekly basis.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q I don't reboot unless I absolutely have to. This includes network equipment as well as servers. If you have to reboot things on a monthly basis for "network stability", there is an underlying problem that should be addressed. ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com "One man's ceiling is another man's floor" |-+ | | "Joe Irvine" | | | jirvine@tbopayro| | | ll.com | | | | | | 04/01/2002 11:53 | | | AM | | | Please respond to| | | "MS-Exchange | | | Admin Issues" | | | | |-+ --- ---| | | | To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q | --- ---| I cold-boot my entire network once a month.. it works wonders for network stability. Thanks! Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange server reboot simple q Just curious-- how often do people reboot their exchange servers? Or do you? Our exchange server has been up for 7 months straight now w/o a reboot. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to reboot it every now and then-- free up any memory leakages, etc.. Is it necessary, or can I let it just keep chugging away until it is necessary? Any input, thoughts, etc. would be great. Thanks. paul green seattle --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
Title: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q Why do you want to reboot, if you don't have problems? In my poorly worded statement, all I meant was, address the problems rather than rebooting. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q Although your statement was poorly worded, I am assuming that you are asking what "needs and concerns" do not translate to instability. First of all, I would never assume that I know everyone else's network layout, nor would I make a blanket answer concerning something like this. I have seen enough to know that that would be arrogant and ignorant to do so. Someone has already pointed out one scenario. I do not personally reboot Exchange unless I have to, which translates to 2-12 weeks usually. -Original Message-----From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q What "needs and concerns"? Doesn't that " needs and concerns " translate to instability? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q I disagree. Stating that a monthly reboot shows signs of instability is not a sound statement. It depends on your needs and concerns. If he said on a weekly basis, I would agree... -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q Do you have proof that is does anything? --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Beasley, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q We reboot to clear memory on a biweekly basis.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q I don't reboot unless I absolutely have to. This includes network equipment as well as servers. If you have to reboot things on a monthly basis for "network stability", there is an underlying problem that should be addressed. ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com "One man's ceiling is another man's floor" |-+ | | "Joe Irvine" | | | jirvine@tbopayro| | | ll.com | | | | | | 04/01/2002 11:53 | | | AM | | | Please respond to| | | "MS-Exchange | | | Admin Issues" | | | | |-+ --- ---| | | | To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q | --- ---| I cold-boot my entire network once a month.. it works wonders for network stability. Thanks! Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange server reboot simple q Just curious-- how often do people reboot their exchange servers? Or do you? Our exchange server has been up for 7 months straight now w/o a reboot. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to reboot it every now and then-- free up any memory leakages, etc.. Is it necessary, or can I let it just keep chugging away until it is necessary? Any input, thoughts, etc. would be great. Thanks. paul green seattle --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0
RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow
Title: Message Even I thought he still wants to get out of his network to the world. Mal -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow But I think the key here is he still wants to be able to send to one particular domain -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow Why 3rd party? What Exchange version? 5.5: Section 3.6: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm 2000: Section 5.3: http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec5.htm William -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:31 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow 3rd party -Original Message- From: German Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Restricting Internet e-mail flow Hello guys: Do you know how can I restrict internet e-mail capabilities for one group of users? The problem is that I need to restrict a group of specific users from sending e-mail to all internet domains except one (for an associated company). Please advice. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Workgorup Vs. Domain
Title: Message They said, the issue is boyond their knolwedge. -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Workgorup Vs. Domain What does the NT newsgroup think? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Workgorup Vs. Domain heeheh ive got someone telling me that the pc's in this workgroup shouldnt have access to any domain resources.. I tried telling them.. since you're using local accounts to logon to the box, and there is NO trust between the domain and the workgroup, or the domain and the pc's local accounts what domain resources could possibly be accessed if the pc was actually in the domain??? LOL -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Workgorup Vs. Domain I don't know. I wouldn't think about it. All the PC's here are in my domain. Easier to manage. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Workgorup Vs. Domain Let me ask ya something If you have a group of pc's that have local user accounts on them.. and those pcs are only accessed by those local user accounts, would you think that putting those pc's in a workgroup and not your domain would make them more secured? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hold
Title: RE: E2K, New Sub-Domain in AD, How To? what? -Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: hold holdList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook2002
Long time since I read this name Don Ely. Sounds familiar! Mal -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: outlook2002 Cabal??? Where??? Who's a member??? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] William -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook2002 Windows XP with outlook 2002 every time click on Outlook Today it tells you can not display the page and it gives a message downloading file MSOxx.tmp would like to open or save no mater which option you choose it generate error can not write to c:\Document~1\username\localset\tmp. Any help will be appreciated. XX is hex number that changes every time. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook2002
One more memory stick? mal -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: outlook2002 I've never heard of him. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook2002 Long time since I read this name Don Ely. Sounds familiar! Mal -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: outlook2002 Cabal??? Where??? Who's a member??? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] William List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Is it one copy or multiple copies?
Hello All, When a message sent to all in an organization, does the message reside on all mailboxes (multiple copies) or will it be one copy on the server with a pointer? Little worried about the disk space. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Is it one copy or multiple copies?
Thank you all for your responses. Mal -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Is it one copy or multiple copies? And also unless you have multiple databases in Exchange 2000, in which case there's a copy of the message in each database. And in each set of transaction logs if you've multiple storage groups. Didn't someone say on the other list that SIS is less important now? :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 March 2002 16:33 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Is it one copy or multiple copies? Subject: RE: Is it one copy or multiple copies? one message, with multiple pointers. unless you have mailboxes on another server, then there will be another message on that server, with multiple pointers. The message (and all pointers) is not deleted, until EVERYONE deletes their copy/pointer to the message -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 08:27 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is it one copy or multiple copies? Hello All, When a message sent to all in an organization, does the message reside on all mailboxes (multiple copies) or will it be one copy on the server with a pointer? Little worried about the disk space. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Virus
This should answer your concern. http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/exceedinglyinfected.html Mal -Original Message- From: Nelson Aguillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Virus I received the same type of warning last week. It also involved a zip file. I did not call Antigen. Nelson -Original Message- From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Virus I received this from Antigen this morning. Antigen for Exchange found URLSnooper-106.zip infected with ExceedinglyInfected virus. I am guessing it found this zip to be infected with multiple viruses. Or is there a virus called ExceedinglyInfected? Just wondering if anyone knows. Mark List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Can not configure mail profile
Why is that you are sending the same question under different subject? -Original Message- From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Can not configure mail profile Hi All, I installed an archiving product on my test exchange server. Somehow, I am the only one able to configure a mail profile. Also, the administrator of that exchange domain can create a mail profile but any other user gets the following message: The name could not be resolved. The name could not be related to a name in the address list. Has anyone experienced this? My server is Exchange 5.5 SP4, client is Outlook 2000. Thank you, Rodney Li List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
the content length
Title: Message Hello, When I am sending mail to a particular address I get this error, The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take delivery. The MTS-ID of the original message is - - - - Has anybody encountered this before? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
redirecting mail
Hello All, We have an employee who will work as a consultant from home I need to redirect all his mail to his AOL account I need to keep his account and he shouldn't be able to login into the mailbox I don't want to keep his mails on his mailbox either His name should be visible on our address list, so that internally people are able to send him mail What is the easiest way to achieve this By the way we use NT 40, exchange55 and OL2000 TIA Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://wwwsunbelt-softwarecom/exchange_list_charterhtm
RE: Exchange problems
This is not by me. This is by one of the exchange guru, who mentioned about it. Mal There is a lot more to maintaining Exchange than applying service packs. You should also regularly review your event logs (daily, if not more frequently). There are some good tools out there that can automate this for you. You should also regularly collect and monitor performance data. You also need to watch mail queues for build-up, verify that your Exchange-aware antivirus software is working and keeping up-to-date, monitor disk space, and perform a whole other slew of tasks that combine to form your Exchange maintenance practices. Don't think for a minute that applying service packs is all you need to do to keep your servers up longer. There are lots of other factors that affect uptime and availability and they should not be overlooked. My $.02. -Scott -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange problems What Antivirus on the Exch server? You could probably benefit from some more RAM as well. -Original Message- From: Velez, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange problems Hi, I have Dell Server with 512MB Ram, 2-750 CPU, 60Gig, NT4.0 SP67a, Exchange5.5 SP4. 500 mailboxes. Every more or less 6 months, messages with attachments take a long time to open (5sec), the only way that I have found to resolve this issue is to move the mailboxes to 2nd server and back!! Have you experienced something like that?? What about maintenance, does anybody have some good maint tips on Exchange?? Thanks allot. Tony List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Burning PST files.
Once you copied the pst file to the home directory of the user. Did you use File - open - personal folder Did you uncheck the read only attribute on the file (if it was still said read only after copying to the home directory!) we have been successfully doing this for quite some time. Mal -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Burning PST files. Is it possible to burn PST files to a CD and still use them? We have some users with very large PST files that are gobbling up server space. We tried burning a PST file to a CD, but we were then unable to access it. Even after copying the file back to their home drive and trying to take ownership of it. Has anybody had any success with this? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6. Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans
Title: Message They can take a walk J -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans I need to be more specific I see. This is for use on the LAN. They want functionality to do ALL their email from Outlook, and they want as convenient as possible, and they want it NOW (you know the drill). IN other words, no OWA, and no POP. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans have them give you account on there server and pop the mail off. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Where is exmerge.exe
http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch55/utility/q224493/nt4alpha/en-us/i loveyouhlpi.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Where is exmerge.exe Search in the KB Database for ILOVEYOU (that's right, all one word). Follow the links and you'll get to it. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Where is exmerge.exe Where do I find the exmerge.exe file and its components? I've searched the exchange cd, but found nothing. jim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Radio Buttons
Exchange? Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Radio Buttons I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have their own radio buttons. But I can't select more than one radio button for the whole page. What do I have to do in order to be able to check one radio button for one category. Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 access
Would this help? 1. Why do I get this error, There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected.? - Here is the error message I keep getting and the settings I have using outlook express: There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: 'Account Name', Server: 'mail.domain.ext', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR Bad login', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 incoming mail=mail.domain.ext outgoing mail=smtp.isp.ext account name=accountuser password=accountpassword When you change your account password it does not change an email addresses' password. You need to change the username's password to what you want it to be. You need to do this in the Mail Manager, located in your Hosting Control Panel =) Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:pop3 access Hello All, ex55srvsp4 on win2ksrvsp2 behind msproxy2 I have a user trying to access pop3 mail. My tests (using Outlook Express5) keep coming back to the repeated logon screen with the 0x800CCC90 and 92 errors. I have tried almost everything according to the MS articles associated with this error id. Please help me think out loud and give me any advice based on your experiences. Thanks, Fred Valdez List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes
These are excerpts of postings from people who know exchange very well. So if you are still want to kinda have romance with ESEUTIL, you can go ahead and do it. Mal If you are running out of disk space AND there is no whitespace in the database, as indicated by Event ID 1221 in the application event log, then running eseutil will net you NOTHING. If he stops the online maintenance that runs at night by default, I would remove him from the duties of administering the Exchange Server at least until he reads all the whitepapers again. I am not kidding. He is right that we don't want maintenance during primary periods of usage. Allowing online maintenance its nightly window is best. NTBackup does back up the whitespace. The additional time is negligible. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP Use it only when it's needed. It is run regularly only by misinformed admins that: 1) consider their email content and server non-critical. 2) do not need email to be available to their users 24/7. 3) enjoy playing with the cleaning people on the IT chesterfield. William I run it because that is the ONLY way to regain space in the Exchange DB that has been freed up by messages being deleted etc. If I did not do this on a regular basis I would hit the Exchange 5.5 IS limit. 1) That logic is so flawed I can smell it from here. (Forgive me if I'm wrong, Sherry, but aren't you the one that recovers the SAME 450MB every month or was that someone else?) That might have been someone else. It is simply NOT correct. The database doesn't perpetually grow if there is unused whitespace. it doesn't work in 5.5 when you try to redirect the temp database, it must run on the same physical drive that it is stored. 2) That is also incorrect. Have a look at eseutil /? (which in my opinion is the only switch you should be running eseutil with). Do be aware that the speed of this process over the network will be significantly slower than if the temp database was local. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ Only use it if you are directed to by PSS, or if you are using the standard edition of Exchange 5.5 and are running into the 16GB limit. Exchange handles online defrag quite well so there should be no need to run and offline defrag unless you are running into the 16GB limit on Standard Edition. Not to use! Don ely -Original Message- From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Eseutil So what is the best practice with defragmentation? MS says that ESEUITL is not considered a tool for regular maintenance and should only be used in case of emergency after contacting Microsoft Technical Support. On the other hand, there're people here that use it on monthly basis! So, to use or not to use? most the people here who use it on a monthly basis would have a very difficult time explaining what the log files are, what they are used for, and why they are there. don't go by them. Listen to people who know what they are talking about. DON'T TOUCH eseutil unless you are on the phone with PSS or know what you are doing and have a very good backup. The best maintance for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done. The longer a server is up the better. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes In 5.5 priv.edb will not decrease in size unless you run the ESEUTIL. On a small drive like mine that's a major issue, and we run ESEUTIL once a month to recover space. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes Read the event log, See what the online defrags tell you you have for white space. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Douglas Hull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Priv.edb not decreasing despite deleting moving mailboxes I have built a 2nd Exchange server for my site as my primary server is running out of disk space. I have been moving mailboxes across to the new server as well as getting users to delete and archive as much as possible, however the size of my PRIV.edb file on primary server does not seem to be decreasing! It is approaching 16GB which I know
RE: Outlook Question BCC
He will now make a dogged effort to know the correct answer :) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook Question BCC How about simple English then. No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
outlook-fax
Title: Message Hello All, When sending a new mail message in outlook from contact list, is there a way to avoid outlook 2000 listing the fax number of the contact person and to show only email addresses? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force
Please check this out. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q283287 -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force I have a user that is having trouble sending mail to one person outside of our company. No one else is having trouble sending to the same email address. I can not seem to find any information relevant to my particular issue. The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 1/3/02 11:24 AM The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force mydomain #5.7.0 smtp;550 5.7.0 Message rejected. Has anyone ran into this and know a fix? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force
That would be a Tie - - - - Break -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force Jennifer Love Hewitt?? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 1/3/02 11:24 AM The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force bemail.BEDOMAIN.BEAP.COM #5.7.0 smtp;550 5.7.0 Message rejected. I forgot, Exchange 2000 with SP2. -Original Message- From: Sawatzke, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force Is it any message? Or a specific one? It may contain key words that are not allowed. What is the user's name, is it Dick, or some other word that may be considered offensive? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force I have a user that is having trouble sending mail to one person outside of our company. No one else is having trouble sending to the same email address. I can not seem to find any information relevant to my particular issue. The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 1/3/02 11:24 AM The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force mydomain #5.7.0 smtp;550 5.7.0 Message rejected. Has anyone ran into this and know a fix? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: comm. failure... Please help
Title: RE: comm. failure... Please help http://iats.missouri.edu/servlets/knowledgebase/article/13502 This was the link I referred to when I had problem. A user was trying to send a mail to the same address everyday with the domain name typed in wrong. Check this article. -Original Message- From: Sawatzke, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: comm. failure... Please help That is the entire message? Do you know the intended destination of the message? -Original Message- From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: comm. failure... Please help E2K in mixed mode. When sending sporadic external emails with attachments, we get the following error message: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=JonesApparelGrou;l=JAG_EXCHANGE-011213211335Z-21807 Any ideas? The clients that are having the problem are on exchange 5.5 servers, and the Internet mail connector is on a exchange 5.5 server. -Original Message- From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: comm. failure... Please help where is this updated -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: comm. failure... Please help Looks like an ldap port conflict to me Make sure your AD is set to 389 and your exchange is set to 390 -Original Message- From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: FW: comm. failure... Please help any ideas? -Original Message- From: Brian Bauer Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:56 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: comm. failure... Please help Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=JonesApparelGrou;l=JAG-EXCH-03-011212161441Z-2 Im getting this off and onany ideas List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
Hi there, Is there any tool with which I can clean all the mailboxes on my exchange from this dirty Hi message? Thanks mal -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm Configure NAV for Exchange to block attachments. This stopped goner in its tracks. I block: *.com, *.exe, *.scr and also the double extensions like *.jpg.vbs. and assorted others. http://service4.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/docid/271215411348 Bob -Original Message- From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm We just got this one. Norton's on Exchange and the desktops did NOT catch it and our virus definitions are current, so be careful. We are downloading Antigen as I type. Karen Palmer SCJD List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Disk space on exchange server
Title: Message Hello, I know there were lots of discussions on this subject some time back. I have read all postings relating to ESEUTIL from Scott, Kevin, William and Don. My problem is I have an array of 54 GB on an exchange enterprise 5.5 on NT. Last month I had a free space of 2.68 GB, since then I have got all big mailboxes archived on to CDs/DVDs. As per my calculations, at least 8 GB was freed up. But it still shows 2.68 GB free space for last one month. What do I do now? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disk space on exchange server
Title: Message Thanks for all your suggestions. Does that mean, automatic defrag is not happening? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server High 5 back to ya! ;o) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Woohoo! High-5!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server You determine if the downtime you will incur is worth recovering the 8GB. Basically, you need to go check your application log for Event ID 1221 to see how much free space the online defrag has given you. Once that is determined, you then decided how valuable that disk space is. Keep in mind that with a 54GB array and 2GB free that means you have an approximate DB size of 52GB. That means quite a few hours (6-12)of downtime to recover it. Personally, I'd install another disk in your array and leave it alone, but that's me... -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Disk space on exchange server Hello, I know there were lots of discussions on this subject some time back. I have read all postings relating to ESEUTIL from Scott, Kevin, William and Don. My problem is I have an array of 54 GB on an exchange enterprise 5.5 on NT. Last month I had a free space of 2.68 GB, since then I have got all big mailboxes archived on to CD's/DVD's. As per my calculations, at least 8 GB was freed up. But it still shows 2.68 GB free space for last one month. What do I do now? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disk space on exchange server
Title: Message That was an excellent explanation. I got the hang of it now.. Add couple of disks, grab the sleeping bag and the bible. Sounds good to me. Thanks to all exchange gurus. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server No the online defrag is happening... but it does not reduce the size of the store. It just cleans up the whitespace and does basic housekeeping. If it says you have 8 gigs of free space... then that means you can pile 8 gigs of data into the store before it starts growing again. I.E. your priv.edb is 52 gigs... but it currently only contains 44 gigs of used space and 8 gigs of white.Once the 8 gigs of white are gone... the store will grow beyong 52 gigs. If you deleted every mailbox tomorrow... your priv.edb would still be 52 gigs... with 52 gigs of whitespace. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Thanks for all your suggestions. Does that mean, automatic defrag is not happening? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server High 5 back to ya! ;o) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Woohoo! High-5!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server You determine if the downtime you will incur is worth recovering the 8GB. Basically, you need to go check your application log for Event ID 1221 to see how much free space the online defrag has given you. Once that is determined, you then decided how valuable that disk space is. Keep in mind that with a 54GB array and 2GB free that means you have an approximate DB size of 52GB. That means quite a few hours (6-12)of downtime to recover it. Personally, I'd install another disk in your array and leave it alone, but that's me... -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Disk space on exchange server Hello, I know there were lots of discussions on this subject some time back. I have read all postings relating to ESEUTIL from Scott, Kevin, William and Don. My problem is I have an array of 54 GB on an exchange enterprise 5.5 on NT. Last month I had a free space of 2.68 GB, since then I have got all big mailboxes archived on to CD's/DVD's. As per my calculations, at least 8 GB was freed up. But it still shows 2.68 GB free space for last one month. What do I do now? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disk space on exchange server
Title: Message Thank you very much William. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server It probably is still happening. Information in the application event log, which you check every morning, will indicate that. Other links: How to defrag with eseutil: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q192/1/85.ASP How to recover HD space: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q255/0/35.ASP Best practices for Exchange database management: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechnol/exchange/maintain/optimize/edbwp.asp William -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Thanks for all your suggestions. Does that mean, automatic defrag is not happening? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server High 5 back to ya! ;o) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Woohoo! High-5!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server You determine if the downtime you will incur is worth recovering the 8GB. Basically, you need to go check your application log for Event ID 1221 to see how much free space the online defrag has given you. Once that is determined, you then decided how valuable that disk space is. Keep in mind that with a 54GB array and 2GB free that means you have an approximate DB size of 52GB. That means quite a few hours (6-12)of downtime to recover it. Personally, I'd install another disk in your array and leave it alone, but that's me... -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Disk space on exchange server Hello, I know there were lots of discussions on this subject some time back. I have read all postings relating to ESEUTIL from Scott, Kevin, William and Don. My problem is I have an array of 54 GB on an exchange enterprise 5.5 on NT. Last month I had a free space of 2.68 GB, since then I have got all big mailboxes archived on to CD's/DVD's. As per my calculations, at least 8 GB was freed up. But it still shows 2.68 GB free space for last one month. What do I do now? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disk space on exchange server
Title: Message Thats the way I relax though. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server If you add a couple of disks, the bible and sleeping bag are unnecessary... ;o) -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server That was an excellent explanation. I got the hang of it now.. Add couple of disks, grab the sleeping bag and the bible. Sounds good to me. Thanks to all exchange gurus. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server No the online defrag is happening... but it does not reduce the size of the store. It just cleans up the whitespace and does basic housekeeping. If it says you have 8 gigs of free space... then that means you can pile 8 gigs of data into the store before it starts growing again. I.E. your priv.edb is 52 gigs... but it currently only contains 44 gigs of used space and 8 gigs of white.Once the 8 gigs of white are gone... the store will grow beyong 52 gigs. If you deleted every mailbox tomorrow... your priv.edb would still be 52 gigs... with 52 gigs of whitespace. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Thanks for all your suggestions. Does that mean, automatic defrag is not happening? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server High 5 back to ya! ;o) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Woohoo! High-5!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server You determine if the downtime you will incur is worth recovering the 8GB. Basically, you need to go check your application log for Event ID 1221 to see how much free space the online defrag has given you. Once that is determined, you then decided how valuable that disk space is. Keep in mind that with a 54GB array and 2GB free that means you have an approximate DB size of 52GB. That means quite a few hours (6-12)of downtime to recover it. Personally, I'd install another disk in your array and leave it alone, but that's me... -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Disk space on exchange server Hello, I know there were lots of discussions on this subject some time back. I have read all postings relating to ESEUTIL from Scott, Kevin, William and Don. My problem is I have an array of 54 GB on an exchange enterprise 5.5 on NT. Last month I had a free space of 2.68 GB, since then I have got all big mailboxes archived on to CD's/DVD's. As per my calculations, at least 8 GB was freed up. But it still shows 2.68 GB free space for last one month. What do I do now? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disk space on exchange server
Title: Message I am not going that way. I am not adding any gasoline (except for my car), no large fire but let me be dancing. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Just for good measure... you're going to find that the majority of us do not recommend running edbutil unless you have a serious emergency issue. The recommended solution is to add some more disks... and maybe reconsider your mailbox limits. If you do decide to run a defrag... you are going to need to have 52 gigs of space available for the temp file. It is HIGHLY recommended this space be on another array on the same box. You can map a drive to another server with available space... however all you're doing is adding a ton of gasoline to the already large fire your dancing naked in. Preston Craig Jeffares Network Engineer Georgia Department of Motor Vehicle Safety -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server That was an excellent explanation. I got the hang of it now.. Add couple of disks, grab the sleeping bag and the bible. Sounds good to me. Thanks to all exchange gurus. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server No the online defrag is happening... but it does not reduce the size of the store. It just cleans up the whitespace and does basic housekeeping. If it says you have 8 gigs of free space... then that means you can pile 8 gigs of data into the store before it starts growing again. I.E. your priv.edb is 52 gigs... but it currently only contains 44 gigs of used space and 8 gigs of white.Once the 8 gigs of white are gone... the store will grow beyong 52 gigs. If you deleted every mailbox tomorrow... your priv.edb would still be 52 gigs... with 52 gigs of whitespace. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Thanks for all your suggestions. Does that mean, automatic defrag is not happening? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server High 5 back to ya! ;o) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server Woohoo! High-5!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disk space on exchange server You determine if the downtime you will incur is worth recovering the 8GB. Basically, you need to go check your application log for Event ID 1221 to see how much free space the online defrag has given you. Once that is determined, you then decided how valuable that disk space is. Keep in mind that with a 54GB array and 2GB free that means you have an approximate DB size of 52GB. That means quite a few hours (6-12)of downtime to recover it. Personally, I'd install another disk in your array and leave it alone, but that's me... -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Disk space on exchange server Hello, I know there were lots of discussions on this subject some time back. I have read all postings relating to ESEUTIL from Scott, Kevin, William and Don. My problem is I have an array of 54 GB on an exchange enterprise 5.5 on NT. Last month I had a free space of 2.68 GB, since then I have got all big mailboxes archived on to CD's/DVD's. As per my calculations, at least 8 GB was freed up. But it still shows 2.68 GB free space for last one month. What do I do now? Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: dns server encountered invalid domain
This means DNS server has received an invalid domain name. The domain name might have contained invalid characters. Microsoft DNS only supports 0-9, a-z, A-Z, - (hyphen), and the dot as part of a domain name. Mal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: dns server encountered invalid domain we have nt 4.0 dns server and the event viewer display the error: DNS server encountered invalid domain name in packet from 192.36.148.17. Packet is rejected Why? kp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Computer Associates
Title: Message Easy, if his writings exceeds two words - Mal -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Computer Associates How could we tell the difference? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Computer Associates I took some cold medicine and it has me loopy... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Still out of Disk space
May be indicates that while the disk may appear to have enough space, in reality, due to fragmentation or size of the allocation unit on the disk, the usable space may not be enough. I suggest doing a chkdsk and a defragmentation.However wait till exchange biggies are back from lunch. Mal -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Still out of Disk space Hi guys, I am still getting out of disk space errors that shut down exchange. It's a win2k sp2 exch2k sp1. here is the error: Source: MSExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12801 Message processing failed because there is not enough available disk space (8004010D-82000374). I have checked the KB and Technet till my eyes are about to fall out. All it says is delete some files to make more space. This is a small system by comparison about 50 users and mailboxes with public folders. The storage container is about 3 gigs and the drive that exchange seems to create is 5 gigs.A check of the drives free space before a reboot is less than a 100k. After reboot it's almost 2 gigs. There is nothing on this drive to delete. If it need to be bigger I haven't figured out how to increase it's size. Any help would be greatly appreciated. The hair on the top of my head is thin and getting thinner by the minute. TIA Matt List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocking email
Title: Message Then what happened? Does that fix? -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking email yes -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking email Did you stop and restart the IMS? -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking email how??? its not working for me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking email I don't believe that's correct. You can block the whole domain or the individual e-mail address. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking email It will only block specific email addresses, it does not include the functionality to block entire domains. It's a feature. -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking email yes [EMAIL PROTECTED] should block all email from that person or @domain.com should block all email from that domain.. it doesnt -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking email It should. When blocking by domain you included the @ symbol, yes? William -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocking email Exchange 5.5 sp4: using the message filtering option on the IMS doesnt actually block emails, even with the turfdir created...any ideas? Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Rookie Mistake - Please Help
No backups? God save you man. Unless Williams or Dons has something new to pull out from their hats. Mal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Rookie Mistake - Please Help Not sure what brick level backups are...we have only had the machine about a week and have not implemented any tape backups of this drive. As far as exchange goes it is basically the default install. -Original Message- From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Rookie Mistake - Please Help Are you doing brick level backups? If so, you should be able to restore the mailboxes. Karen Palmer SCJD List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.291 / Virus Database: 156 - Release Date: 10/25/2001 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.291 / Virus Database: 156 - Release Date: 10/25/2001 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 on Win2k
I wasn't being sarcastic. I was being realistic. It takes same time to search these links, whether it is for you or to others. So your whining was uncalled for. Sorry if I am being wrong. Mal -Original Message- From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange 5.5 on Win2k No, do you like to exude sarcasm in your emails ??? -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2001 08:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on Win2k Did you expect somebody to search these URL's for you? Mal -Original Message- From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange 5.5 on Win2k Importance: High Hi all Somewhat relating to this issue, I have compiled a list of URLs on this subject, and particular to w2k clustering. As I didn't get a response for this list, I'd assume that no one is doing this... Installing E5.5 on a W2K Server http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/55/Upgrade2000qi.asp Deploying Exchange 2000 Clustering with SP1 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KSP1_Cluster.asp Exchange 5.5 Clustering Document Exchange CD\Support\WordDocs\Cluster.doc A Guide to Upgrading E5.5 to E2k http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/prodtechnol/exchange/deploy/depovg/e2kguide.a sp Migrating E5.5 User mailboxes to E2k http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/Migrate_MB.asp I hope this is of some benefit to someone on this list.. Cheers Dan Yarrow MCSE ADIT NT/2000 Systems Administrator Central Queensland University Information Technology Division Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +61 7 4923 2151 Fax +61 7 4930 9254 -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2001 03:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on Win2k There are always issues. However, by putting Exchange on Windows2000, you've helped eliminate some of those issues. It'll be easier with Exchange already on W2K rather than still on NT. William -Original Message- From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 on Win2k I am building an additional exchange server into my site, I am planning on W2k and Exchange 5.5. Then migrating all users off the old server and shutting it down. My question is when I go to actually upgrade my PDC's and BDC to W2k and implement AD will there be any issues with the server running w2k and exchange 5.5? Thanks Julie Lienemann Colorado School of Mines [EMAIL PROTECTED] (303) 273-3877 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Novadigm's Radia
Title: RE: Exchange 2000 proplemcan't receive mail... I am extremely sorry this was not intended for this list. Mal -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:02 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Novadigm's Radia Hello All, Has anybody Implemented Novadigms Radia? If so, please throw in your views. For curious minds, it is a tool to deploy, update and maintain software easy way (thats what the product say!) Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Novadigm's Radia
Title: RE: Exchange 2000 proplemcan't receive mail... Hello All, Has anybody Implemented Novadigms Radia? If so, please throw in your views. For curious minds, it is a tool to deploy, update and maintain software easy way (thats what the product say!) Thanks Mal -Original Message- From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 proplemcan't receive mail... Looks like authentication problem between your server and smarthost or what ever you are using to send mail. Eugene Pesochin Systems Manager ClubMom, Inc. 200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl New York, New York 10016 tel 646.435.6565 fax 646.435.6600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.clubmom.com -Original Message- From: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 proplemcan't receive mail... We have an Exchange 2000 server running... it can send mail but it can't receive mail... this is the error that I get.. Oct 17 21:06:48 na sendmail[13107]: f9I0vfF12422: to=, ctladdr= (500/500), delay=00:09:07, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=21182674, relay=..xxx. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 454 5.7.3 Client was not authenticated. Any ideas? AlV List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
unable to open your default e-mail - - - - -
Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca Hello All, I am sorry if my question is too long When I attempt to log on to another user's mailbox by providing the proper credentials I get an error unable to open your default email folders. You do not have permission to log on. Would you like to open your default file system folder instead. From the Microsoft site I learn it is IPC$ share problem. By running net use \\servername\IPC$ /user:username from the desktop, I could fix the problem. This worked very well for months. Now suddenly the same problem has appeared and has become a regular problem. More annoyingly the dial up users is having the same problem, even though they are trying to view their own mailbox. It is hard to convince all the users to run this command each time they dial in. Is there a permanent fix for this problem. We use exch5.5 on NT4.0 which being our DC too. TIA Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: WAKE UP!!!!
You are risking IT again. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: WAKE UP Fly Naked! -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WAKE UP The intel failed, the metal detectors failed, the x-ray machines failed, and the baggage inspections failed. Ultimately the last line of defense, and the only one that worked at all was the passengers. Maybe we should be looking at developing that last line of defense, rather than trying to find ways to disarm it. -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WAKE UP No need to bother, I already know how easy it would be. I think it is a fine analogy. Security is security. If you don't change/update it, the bad guys will find the holes in it. -Original Message- From: Andrew Baker [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: IMS stoppage
Don't I hate them? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: IMS stoppage Damn developers -Original Message- From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS stoppage I was able to start both services successfully, but I did find some more messages that were sitting in the queue which might choke it later tonight. They had abnormal header information, but were all related to the same application, primarily developer machines sending buildall reports with numeric characters with a - before them. I'm not sure if that's relevant, but it seems to choking on those messages only. DJ -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS stoppage Interesting. I have seen this or similar on 4 unrelated sites in 5 weeks, all Exchange 5.5 SP4. It looks like a delivery notification returning from xyz chokes in the IMC and results in a DrWatson in Store.exe. Restarting the IS is simple, but restarting the IMC gives another DrWatson and halts the IS. The fast fix has been to clear out imcdata/in, remove imcdata/queue.dat and restart the services. The suspect delivery notifications look normal except for a large chunk of ms-tnef stuff appended. I'm resisting the temptation to post an example to the list ;) Anyone else seeing this? Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 13 September 2001 7:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS stoppage Thanks for your help. It seems that one of the developers did a buildall in VC++ and had the results mailed to him. For some reason that message wouldn't move through the server. I'm not sure what to look for when he does it again, but I'm going to use the MDB viewer tool to see what I come up with. Thanks again. DJ -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS stoppage IMC stops IS worked for me... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q232/2/79.ASP -Original Message- From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS stoppage Don, Malformed email header search didn't produce anything. Is there a more Microsoft encyclopedia name for malformed? DJ -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS stoppage Search technet on malformed email headers, I'm sure you will find some nice results and resolutions to your problem. There is a tool on the Exch CD called MDBVU32.EXE which should help resolve the issue. D -Original Message- From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: IMS stoppage I came in this morning and the IS and the IMS services had stopped last night. The event log is saying that there was a BAD message. Summary of events in order are as follows: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Performance Event ID: 0 Date: 9/11/2001 Time: 11:53:55 PM User: N/A Computer: Description: MSExchangeIS (396) Unexpected Win32 error: 0x79 Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 126 Date: 9/11/2001 Time: 11:53:56 PM User: N/A Computer: Description: MSExchangeIS (396) Unable to write to section 0 while flushing the log. Error -1022. Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 193 Date: 9/11/2001 Time: 11:53:57 PM User: N/A Computer: Description: MSExchangeIS (396) The database engine failed with error -510 while trying to log the commit of a transaction. To ensure database consistency, the process was terminated. Simply restart the process to force database recovery and return the database to a consistent state. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4182 Date: 9/11/2001 Time: 11:55:54 PM User: N/A Computer: Description: An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. As a result, the message in spool file R9JGKTFZ will be retried when the server is restarted. Data: : 73 05 01 00 15 01 04 80 s..EUR Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event
RE: outlook
Do you use McAfee antivirus? -Original Message- From: Angie Sawyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: outlook I've seen this in Outlook 2002. We were able to open Task Manager and it would immediately open the attachment. Running a Detect and Repair seems to fix the issue temporarily at least. -Original Message- From: HADI, ALI (ALI)** CTR ** [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook Hi all , Have you guys comes across this prob in outlook 2K when you have an attachment ( word or excel or whatever) and you try to save it, either after opening the mail or by just right clicking on the attachment, the program hangs !! thanks Best Regards / Meilleures salutations Ali Hadi Compaq EUS Technicien/France Incident Mgr Lucent Technologies 16 Avenue Descartes 92350 Plessis Robinson France Tel : 00 331 41 28 5596 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
License token has expired
Hello All Recently I disabled my license manager on the exchange server as it was showing incorrect information. Now the clients get this error license token has expired. Refresh license token? Any clues? Thanks a lot Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
