RE: Wondering

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Samuel
Adams

  -Original Message-From: Don Ely
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04,
2001
  10:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
  Wondering
  C'mon now.  That stuff is nasty...  Lagers, Ale's,
  etc...  that's where the good beer is.  Micro Brews are the
only
  half way decent thing coming out of America for
beer.
   
  D
   
   "Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be
  looking for it." -Henry David Thoreau
  

-Original Message-From: Boswell
Tim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04,
2001
7:07 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Wondering
nah, you have no taste...

  -Original Message-From: Don Ely
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001
  14:58To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
  Wondering
  3 more words...
   
  Piss
  wa
  ter
   
   
  

-Original Message-From:
Boswell
Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,
December 04,
2001 6:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject:
RE: Wondering
3 words:
Bud
Weis
Er
 

  -Original Message-From: Clayton
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001
  14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE:
  Wondering
  Lived there for 2 and a half years mate,
innit?
  Canadian Beer is better.
   
  Sees ya laters geez
  
-Original Message-From: Jones Matt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: December
4, 2001
9:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject:
RE: Wondering
All this talk of beer, and you only mention
lagers... Come to England and try a
real
beer :o) 
Cheers Matt

-Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 14:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:
RE: Wondering 
Dutch Beer? That is all I drink here in the
Netherlands Antilles, and I can't
stand it
anymore! Amstel is awful here, and the Grolsch aint
that
good either. Heinekin is a watery beer like
substance. 
Canadian Beer rules the whole world, even
England,
sorry Lads, but you can't beat a good
bottle
of Kokanee eh! 
-Original Message- From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 3, 2001 3:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:
RE: Wondering 
Dutch beer is the best, pick either one
;)

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: maggie whitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 30 november 2001
23:02 > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues > Onderwerp: Re:
Wondering
> >
> Don't start on beer...Grolshor Cellis a tiny
mini
brewery > in Austin. :)
> - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" >
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:15
PM
> Subject: RE: Wondering > > > > Maybe it's because you won't tell us your
name? > > >
> -Michèle > > Immigration
site:  
> > The Miata:  
> > Tiggercam:  
> >
-
> > I love deadlines. I especially love
the
swooshing sound > they make as
they > go >
> flying by. > >
-
> > >
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001
4:14
PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues > > Subject: Re:
Wondering > > > > > > None of the
criteria's that you have mentioned, however as
> you hint on it > >
later
on, "this discussion > > group
works
like a "members only" social club". >
> I have the same problem, however I seem to find my
> questions answered at
> > other list groups, though I still look thru
this
list which on few >
occasions
> > has given me hints from other
"members"
questions/answers. > >
> > >
> -
Original Message - > > From:
"Eric
Mailloux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001
10:24
AM > > Subject: Wondering
> > >
>
> > Well... I have to ask.
>

RE: Wondering

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Amen.
 
 
"If a man makes a 
statement, and there is not a woman around to hear him; is he still 
wrong?"
 
 

  -Original Message-From: Don Ely 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:44 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Wondering
  We 
  pray to the gods and drink beer in order to ensure life long success in 
  administering Exchange...
   
   "If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing." 
  -Anon 
  

-Original Message-From: Joe Irvine 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:26 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering

I 
just have one question What does this conversation have to do with 
exchange admin issues?
 

 
Thanks!
 
Joe Irvine
http://www.tbopayroll.com/
609-597-1155
 
-Original 
    Message-----From: Scot 
Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:20 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
 
Samuel 
Adams
-Original 
Message-From: Don Ely 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:09 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
C'mon now.  
That stuff is nasty...  Lagers, Ale's, etc...  that's where the 
good beer is.  Micro Brews are the only half way decent thing coming 
out of America for beer.
 
D
 
 
"Success usually comes to those who 
are too busy to be looking for it." -Henry David Thoreau 
-Original 
Message-From: Boswell 
Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:07 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
nah, you have no 
taste...
-Original 
Message-From: Don Ely 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
14:58To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
3 more 
words...
 
Piss
wa
ter
 
 
-Original 
Message-From: Boswell 
Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 6:55 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
3 
words:
Bud
Weis
Er
 
-Original 
Message-From: Clayton 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Lived 
there for 2 and a half years mate, innit? Canadian Beer is 
better.
 
Sees ya 
laters geez
-Original 
Message-From: Jones 
Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: December 4, 2001 9:49 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
All this talk of beer, and you only 
mention lagers... 
Come to England and try a real beer 
:o) 

Cheers Matt 
-Original 
Message- 
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Wondering 
 
Dutch Beer? That is all I drink here 
in the Netherlands Antilles, and I can't stand it anymore! Amstel is 
awful here, and the Grolsch aint that good either. Heinekin is a watery 
beer like substance. 
Canadian Beer rules the whole world, 
even England, sorry Lads, but you can't beat a good bottle of Kokanee 
eh! 
-Original Message- From: 
Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: December 3, 2001 3:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Wondering 
 
Dutch beer is the best, pick either 
one ;) 
 
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- 
> Van: maggie whitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > 
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 november 2001 23:02 > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues > Onderwerp: Re: Wondering > > > Don't 
start on beer...Grolshor Cellis a tiny mini brewery > in Austin. 
:) > - Original Message - > From: 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, 
November 30, 2001 3:15 PM > Subject: RE: Wondering > > 
> > Maybe it's because you won't tell us your name? > > 
> > -Michèle > > Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> > > The 
Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> > > 
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> > > 
- > 
> I love deadlines. I especially love the swooshing sound > they 
make as they > go > > flying by. > > 
- > 
> > > > > -Original Message- > > 
From: m

RE: RE: Wondering

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Nothing a few beers wouldn't fix.

  -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:21 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: RE: 
  Wondering
  Wow! 
  Someone is having a bad day.
  
-Original Message-From: Bob Beatty 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:14 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: RE: 
Wondering

Unsubscribe me - 
shit, fuck, damn you, kiss my ass, go fuck yourself, whatever it takes, 
 please unsubscribe 
me.
 
Thanks
"The hardest thing in life is to know 
which bridge to cross and which to burn." -David Russell 

Good 
quote...
-Original 
Message-From: Don Ely 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 
2001 8:00 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: RE: 
Wondering
 


Maybe 
three of them.  Sounds like we've been tasked with the judging.  
;o)

 

 
"The hardest thing in life is to know 
which bridge to cross and which to burn." -David Russell 

-Original 
Message-From: Clayton 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:55 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: RE: 
Wondering

I think we 
need a panel of judges really.

  -Original 
  Message-From: Snook, 
  Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: December 4, 2001 11:35 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: OT: RE: 
  Wondering
  
  To 
  stop this thread may I make a suggestion. Everyone on the list sends 
  a keg of their favourite beer to me. I will access each one, and 
  sometime in 2003, when I sober up I will post my 
  assessments.
  
   
  
  Kevin "the 
  judge's vote is final" Snook
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: RE: Wondering

[Scot Parsons]

Carling or Old Milwaukee

  -Original Message-From: maggie whitton 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:40 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: RE: 
  Wondering
  Someone send him a case of Shiner Bock, or Cellis 
  Amber. :)List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Wondering

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



I 
wonder what a blend of Budweiser, Molson, Beck's, and Harp would taste 
like?

  -Original Message-From: Jones Matt 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 
  2001 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Wondering
  I'm 
  sorry, I tried, but I can't resist this... You drink scotch and as a 
  preference go for BLENDED??? Open your taste buds to a wonderful world of 
  single malts, the light Speysides to the dark and Peaty Islays, and everything 
  inbetween. And never waste your money on another blended as long as you 
  live.
   
  Cheers
  matt
  
-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 05 December 2001 
16:04To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Nope.. 
can't stand the stuff. It stinks, and really stinks when it goes 
stale.
Prefer 
a good bourbon, or blended whiskey.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
My toys! My toys! I can't do 
this job without my toys! 

  -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 
  04, 2001 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Wondering
  You mean who says all admins drink beer? I was just guessing! Don't 
  you? What, not even a little bit? Not a tiny amount in a sherry glass at 
  Christmas? ;-) 
   
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
15:38To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Says whom?
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing 
because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious 
doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. 
-- 
BuddhaList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm_This 
message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internetdelivered 
through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For furtherinformation 
visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively callStar 
Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm_This 
  message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internetdelivered 
  through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For furtherinformation 
  visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively callStar Internet 
  for details on the Virus Scanning Service.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Wondering

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



No. 
This is much more important.

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 
  2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Wondering
  Is 
  this like Notes vs Exchange?
   
  -Original Message-From: Jones Matt 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 
  2001 8:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Wondering
  I'm 
  sorry, I tried, but I can't resist this... You drink scotch and as a 
  preference go for BLENDED??? Open your taste buds to a wonderful world of 
  single malts, the light Speysides to the dark and Peaty Islays, and everything 
  inbetween. And never waste your money on another blended as long as you 
  live.
   
  Cheers
  matt
  
-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 05 December 2001 
16:04To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Nope.. 
can't stand the stuff. It stinks, and really stinks when it goes 
stale.
Prefer 
a good bourbon, or blended whiskey.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
My toys! My toys! I can't do 
this job without my toys! 

  -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 
  04, 2001 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Wondering
  You mean who says all admins drink beer? I was just guessing! Don't 
  you? What, not even a little bit? Not a tiny amount in a sherry glass at 
  Christmas? ;-) 
   
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
15:38To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Says whom?
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing 
because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious 
doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. 
-- 
BuddhaList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm_This 
message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internetdelivered 
through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For furtherinformation 
visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively callStar 
Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm_This 
  message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internetdelivered 
  through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For furtherinformation 
  visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively callStar Internet 
  for details on the Virus Scanning Service.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

[Scot Parsons]

Oh go wank yourself. There is nothing wrong with a little conversation to
lighten up a stressful dayespecially when the list is quiet. I am quite
sure the gurus would break away from their wankfest to answer any questions
they have the answer to. Lighten up.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?


I know how you feel.. sorry I can't help you with this one, but as far
as that "best-beer-in-the-world-wankfest" I agree totally.. I actually
created a rule in Outlook to delete that topic when it comes in. that
was pretty damn annoying, not to mention unprofessional.


Thanks!

Joe Irvine
http://www.tbopayroll.com/
609-597-1155

 -Original Message-
From:   Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

Off topic rant: I find it funny how many people here jump all over other
people for not giving enough information when they describe problems,
yet
those same people don't respond to messages where enough information is
given, presumably because it is simply too long to read, and those
best-beer-in-the-world-wankfest messages just come too fast and furious.


With that in mind, and hoping that nobody here feels insulted, I will
keep
it short...

Does anyone here know how routing within a site works between Exchange
2k
and Exchange 5.5(w/ADC)? Or maybe point me in the right direction? I
have an
E2k server that just won't forward messages from the Internet to
mailboxes
that reside on the 5.5 servers. Messages within the site work fine, or
from
the Internet to the 5.5 server to a mailbox on the E2k server.

I've looked in archives, knowledge base, white papers...basically the
consensus is that anything going to an E2k server is considered inbound
and
it should recognize an address within the site.

Drew


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

[Scot Parsons]

then filter away

-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?


Sure.. a little conversation is fine.. but 50+ e-mails a day about beer
on an exchange server list? That's excessive. the first 50 or so
messages were cue.. after that (not to mention 3days later) its gotten
old and quite annoying. 


Thanks!

Joe Irvine
http://www.tbopayroll.com/
609-597-1155

 -Original Message-
From:   Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

Oh go wank yourself. There is nothing wrong with a little conversation
to
lighten up a stressful dayespecially when the list is quiet. I am
quite
sure the gurus would break away from their wankfest to answer any
questions
they have the answer to. Lighten up.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?


I know how you feel.. sorry I can't help you with this one, but as far
as that "best-beer-in-the-world-wankfest" I agree totally.. I actually
created a rule in Outlook to delete that topic when it comes in. that
was pretty damn annoying, not to mention unprofessional.


Thanks!

Joe Irvine
http://www.tbopayroll.com/
609-597-1155

 -Original Message-
From:   Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

Off topic rant: I find it funny how many people here jump all over other
people for not giving enough information when they describe problems,
yet
those same people don't respond to messages where enough information is
given, presumably because it is simply too long to read, and those
best-beer-in-the-world-wankfest messages just come too fast and furious.


With that in mind, and hoping that nobody here feels insulted, I will
keep
it short...

Does anyone here know how routing within a site works between Exchange
2k
and Exchange 5.5(w/ADC)? Or maybe point me in the right direction? I
have an
E2k server that just won't forward messages from the Internet to
mailboxes
that reside on the 5.5 servers. Messages within the site work fine, or
from
the Internet to the 5.5 server to a mailbox on the E2k server.

I've looked in archives, knowledge base, white papers...basically the
consensus is that anything going to an E2k server is considered inbound
and
it should recognize an address within the site.

Drew


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Wondering

[Scot Parsons]

it's all urine eventually

-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wondering


Might go well with a pint of Crippled C0ck...
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 5, 2001 12:13 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Wondering
> 
> In Canada, we call that 'urine'.
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:09 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Wondering
> 
> 
> I wonder what a blend of Budweiser, Molson, Beck's, and Harp would taste
> like?
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jones Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:47 AM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: Wondering
>   
>   
>   I'm sorry, I tried, but I can't resist this... You drink scotch and
> as a preference go for BLENDED??? Open your taste buds to a wonderful
> world of single malts, the light Speysides to the dark and Peaty Islays,
> and everything inbetween. And never waste your money on another blended as
> long as you live.
>
>   Cheers
>   matt
>   -Original Message-
>   From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: 05 December 2001 16:04
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: Wondering
>   
>   
>   Nope.. can't stand the stuff. It stinks, and really stinks
> when it goes stale.
>   Prefer a good bourbon, or blended whiskey.
>
>   John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
>   Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
>   (404) 239 - 2981 
>   My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:32 AM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: Wondering
>   
>   
>   You mean who says all admins drink beer? I was just
> guessing! Don't you? What, not even a little bit? Not a tiny amount in a
> sherry glass at Christmas? ;-) 
>
>   Kevin
>   -Original Message-
>   From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: 04 December 2001 15:38
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: Wondering
>   
>   
>   Says whom?
>
>   John Matteson; Exchange Manager
>   Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
>   (404) 239 - 2981 
>   Believe nothing because it is written in books.
> Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it
> is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be
> true. -- Buddha
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>   
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>   
>   
> _
>   This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star
> Internet
>   delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service.
> For further
>   information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or
> alternatively call
>   Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>   
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>   
>   
> _
>   This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
>   delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For
> further
>   information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively
> call
>   Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http

RE: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)



Try 
this:
 
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q152313
 
 

  -Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:53 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Error when 
  backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)
  OK, in light of recent comments about the looong questions not 
  being answered, let me restate my question: 
  Is this the right place to get a question answered about 
  problems using Windows backup and Exchange 5.5 (sp4)?  If so, could 
  someone kindly refer me to another forum?
  Thank you, Eric Holliday 
  -Original Message- From: 
  HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:23 AM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Error when backing 
  up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup) 
  Hello all, First, a little background 
  info: Environment: Exchange 
  5.5 sp4, Enterprise Compaq Proliant ML530, dual Xeon 
  866 proc., 1Gb RAM, 69Gb SAN (whoohoo!) OK. I am 
  temporarily using MS's Windows Backup (ver. 5), until we have Veritas' 
  NetBackup in place. On two of my three servers, it 
  works fine. On the third one, I consistently get the following error: 
  - 
  Backup Status Operation: 
  Backup Active backup destination: File 
  Media name: "Media created 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM" 
  Backup of "LMI\LMIMAIL\LMIMAIL1\Directory" 
  Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: "Set created 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM" Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 12/5/2001 
  at 9:10 AM. The selected Microsoft Exchange service is 
  currently being backed up by another process. 
  Backup completed on 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM. 
  Skipped: 1 Bytes: 0 
  Time:  1 second Media 
  name: "Media created 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM" Backup of 
  "LMI\LMIMAIL\LMIMAIL1\Information Store" Backup set #2 
  on media #1 Backup description: "Set created 12/5/2001 
  at 9:10 AM" Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM. The 
  selected Microsoft Exchange service is currently being 
  backed up by another process. Backup completed on 
  12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM. Skipped: 1 Bytes: 0 Time:  1 second -- The kicker is, there is 
  no other backup process running!  I have rebooted the server, to no 
  avail. Any ideas? TIA, 
  Eric 
  Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator 
  Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute PH:    703.917.7117 mailto: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)



Oops. 
My bad. Sent to wrong list. My apologies.
 
I'll 
buy you a beer sometime to make it up to you.
 
 

  -Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Error when 
  backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)
  Forgive me for being dense, but what does the AT command have to do 
  with this error?
  
-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 
2:13 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Error 
when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)
Try this:
 
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q152313
 
 

  -Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 
  1:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Error 
  when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)
  OK, in light of recent comments about the looong questions 
  not being answered, let me restate my question: 
  Is this the right place to get a question answered about 
  problems using Windows backup and Exchange 5.5 (sp4)?  If so, could 
  someone kindly refer me to another forum?
  Thank you, Eric Holliday 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:23 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup) 
  
  Hello all, First, a little 
  background info: Environment: Exchange 5.5 sp4, Enterprise Compaq 
  Proliant ML530, dual Xeon 866 proc., 1Gb RAM, 69Gb SAN (whoohoo!) 
  OK. I am temporarily using MS's Windows Backup 
  (ver. 5), until we have Veritas' NetBackup in place. On two of my three servers, it works fine. On the third one, I 
  consistently get the following error: - Backup Status Operation: Backup 
  Active backup destination: File Media name: "Media created 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM" Backup of "LMI\LMIMAIL\LMIMAIL1\Directory" Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup 
  description: "Set created 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM" Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 
  12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM. The selected Microsoft 
  Exchange service is currently being backed up by 
  another process. Backup completed on 12/5/2001 at 
  9:10 AM. Skipped: 1 Bytes: 
  0 Time:  1 second Media name: "Media created 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM" Backup of "LMI\LMIMAIL\LMIMAIL1\Information Store" Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup 
  description: "Set created 12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM" Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 
  12/5/2001 at 9:10 AM. The selected Microsoft 
  Exchange service is currently being backed up by 
  another process. Backup completed on 12/5/2001 at 
  9:10 AM. Skipped: 1 Bytes: 
  0 Time:  1 second -- The kicker is, there 
  is no other backup process running!  I have rebooted the server, to 
  no avail. Any ideas? TIA, 
  Eric 
  Eric Holliday Exchange 
  Administrator Corporate Information Systems 
  Logistics Management Institute PH:    703.917.7117 mailto: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Inbox Rules

[Scot Parsons]

under ims properties, internet mail, advanced options, uncheck "Disable
Automatic replies to the internet".

add non-native address to your address book

setup rule using that address


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Inbox Rules


nothing to do with relaying.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
The Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Affirming your similarity to empathy: yeah, like you care 
-


-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Inbox Rules


Yeah,  I've tried that but since I don't allow people to relay it doesn't
work correctly

-Original Message-
From: Hoover, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Inbox Rules


You can do it in Exchange Server by setting the 'Deliver to an Alternate
Recipient' property.


Greg


-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Inbox Rules


Is it possible to have an inbox rule setup to forward all incoming messages
to a custom recipient whoes address is not native to our organization
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?

Exchange 5.5, Outlook 97

Thank You,
Casey Friese
NT Admin / Exchange Admin
Omnicare Clinical Research
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p) 484.679.2784
c) 610.812.2180

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

[Scot Parsons]

This thread would have ended long ago if not for a handful of wet blankets
who would prefer that we get our answers and shut up. I guess it's
unprofessional to develop relationships/friendships with other
Exchange/Network Admins from around the world.

-Original Message-
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?


I am completely amazed that this thread has gone on this long. I seem to
remember other threads being cut off for being off subject on other
listservs. But since I know now that a few of this group are either drunks
or alcoholics, let me tell you that there are a number of great sites on the
web that you can navigate (whoops, is that the correct word) to for
information on how to sober up. For those of you who are social drinkers,
there are some great sites for beer and wine lovers. Perhaps you can find a
listserv on those subjects and leave this list for exchange issues. Thank
you for your attention.

Murray

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?


If you are unsatisfied with the level of professionalism, or service, the
price of your subscription to this list will cheerfully be refunded.

And besides, not all guru's go around in saffron robes chanting OM MANNA
PADA OMMM.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?


About the beerthing, I agree, it's going on for far too long. It's
totally unprofessional.

About your problem, have you created a SMTP connector on your Ex2k
server that forwards to your 5.5 server?
You can have it set to forward all mail to that 5.5 server or forward
mail based on a domain suffix.

Hope this helps. Good luck.

Bob

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: woensdag 5 december 2001 18:16
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?
> 
> 
> Off topic rant: I find it funny how many people here jump all 
> over other
> people for not giving enough information when they describe 
> problems, yet
> those same people don't respond to messages where enough 
> information is
> given, presumably because it is simply too long to read, and those
> best-beer-in-the-world-wankfest messages just come too fast 
> and furious. 
> 
> With that in mind, and hoping that nobody here feels 
> insulted, I will keep
> it short...
> 
> Does anyone here know how routing within a site works between 
> Exchange 2k
> and Exchange 5.5(w/ADC)? Or maybe point me in the right 
> direction? I have an
> E2k server that just won't forward messages from the Internet 
> to mailboxes
> that reside on the 5.5 servers. Messages within the site work 
> fine, or from
> the Internet to the 5.5 server to a mailbox on the E2k server.
> 
> I've looked in archives, knowledge base, white papers...basically the
> consensus is that anything going to an E2k server is 
> considered inbound and
> it should recognize an address within the site.
> 
> Drew
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA Issue I know you can solve - so do it

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



I had 
a similar problem. I had one user whose mailbox and domain user names did not 
match. They were entering the same name for their mailbox and their login name. 


  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:25 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA Issue I 
  know you can solve - so do it
  
  Yes all Domian Users have LOL rights
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 
  2001 2:00 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA Issue I know you can 
  solve - so do it
   
  
  From any 
  machine?
  
  Do they 
  have the "logon locally" right?
  
-Original 
Message-From: Ellery 
July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 
2001 12:00 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: OWA Issue I 
know you can solve - so do it
I have two people who are not 
able to access OWA - everyone else can. The two people do have Domain Users 
rights. Interestingly they had lock out problem referenced in Q278299 but 
with that (maybe) fixed they can not access OWA
 
ellery 
july
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: messagewise message?

[Scot Parsons]

Do you run Novell?

-Original Message-
From: Richardson, Kendall (UNISYS)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: messagewise message?


I am getting the following message via email from my exchange server 5.5
SP4, NT4 SP6a.   the message gets repeated about once every 2 minutes.

MessageWise.Public IS disk % free space = -1

I've never seen this message before.  Can anyone tell me what it means.  I
have a server monitor and 2 link monitors set up to notify me via email and
page when things go south.  Since the message came via email, I assume it
was generated by one of the monitors.   I  have approx 10 public folders
(less than 3MB total space) that get replicated out to a sister site in the
next state.  I looked at the disk space on the server, and there is LOTs of
free space, and mail is flowing normally.  Thanks 

Ken


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's



Have 
you tried a lmhosts file?

  -Original Message-From: Dawn R. Ashford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:00 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
  troubles with Mac's
  Early on we tried the host file; it didn't help.  We've had 
  several consultants come in and try to get it working without 
  success.
  
-Original Message-From: Brent Hudson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 
10:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's
I 
found putting a hosts file on the mac works, remember MACS cannot use wins 
to resolve, I bet if you put the IP of the Exchange box in tthe ms ecxhange 
settings the netbios name of the server will appera, but after that it 
cannot resolve the name.. best bet is a hosts file but to be honest I've 
forgotten where on the mac to put it such a long long time 
ago
 
HTH
B

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: 08 January 2002 
  06:23Posted To: ExchangeConversation: Exchange 5.5 
  troubles with Mac'sSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with 
  Mac's
  Get rid of the macs 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Chris Thelen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:17 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's 
  I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server that works fine with the 
  win2k machines on my network, but is just starting to have problems with 
  some macs.  I setup 5 macs on my network to use the server and it was 
  working fine for a day and a half, but now when they go to open outlook 
  8.2 on their Mac, it asks for the login info, but then errors out saying 
  they have network issues and to talk to your administrator.  I am at 
  a lost, as I am not a Mac expert.  The macs are able to access 
  network resources as well as the internet.  Any ideas?
  Chris 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's



Shows 
how much I know about them stinkin' macs

  -Original Message-From: Brent Hudson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 
  12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's
  LMhosts = Wins no good on a MAC
  
-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 08 January 2002 
07:14To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
5.5 troubles with Mac's
Have you tried a lmhosts file?

  -Original Message-From: Dawn R. Ashford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 
  12:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's
  Early on we tried the host file; it didn't help.  We've 
  had several consultants come in and try to get it working without 
  success.
  
-Original Message-From: Brent Hudson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 
2002 10:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's
I found putting a hosts file on the mac works, 
remember MACS cannot use wins to resolve, I bet if you put the IP of the 
Exchange box in tthe ms ecxhange settings the netbios name of the server 
will appera, but after that it cannot resolve the name.. best bet is a 
hosts file but to be honest I've forgotten where on the mac to put 
it such a long long time ago
 
HTH
B

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: 08 January 2002 
  06:23Posted To: ExchangeConversation: Exchange 
  5.5 troubles with Mac'sSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles 
  with Mac's
  Get rid of the macs 
  -Original Message- From: Chris Thelen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:17 
  AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's 
  
  I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server that works fine with 
  the win2k machines on my network, but is just starting to have 
  problems with some macs.  I setup 5 macs on my network to use the 
  server and it was working fine for a day and a half, but now when they 
  go to open outlook 8.2 on their Mac, it asks for the login info, but 
  then errors out saying they have network issues and to talk to your 
  administrator.  I am at a lost, as I am not a Mac expert.  
  The macs are able to access network resources as well as the 
  internet.  Any ideas?
  Chris 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA with Palm

[Scot Parsons]

...and I hold my beer with my palm

-Original Message-
From: Gabe Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA with Palm


So to recap. 

So people still use their palm.

Someone lives at the Palms.

Someone is going out with one of the Palm sisters.

There was some WinCe'ing at the jokes.

It is possible to view email through OWA with some WinCe devices.

Palm still has 50% Market share.


Thanks for the info!

Gabe



-Original Message-
From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA with Palm


Yeah, and she has a sister too

-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 9, 2002 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA with Palm


I thought Palm was her last name?
 
I'm lost.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA with Palm


I use my palm all the timeoh wait, you meant Palm with a capitol
Poops, never mind.
 

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA with Palm


Aside, I don't know about Palm.  People still use that?
 
-Original Message-
From: Gabe Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA with Palm


Is it possible to view email through OWA with wireless palm or pocket PC
devices? Anyone doing this?
 
 

Gabe 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and
FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 License???

[Scot Parsons]

Up to 
and including 2000, but if I understand correctly, not 2002.

  -Original Message-From: David McSpadden 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:31 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook 2000 
  License???
  I have 300 CALs for Exchange 5.5.  Does thay 
  entitle me to Outlook 2000 or just Outlook 97List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Unable to get to Resource calendar

[Scot Parsons]

Exchange client comes on a CD with Exchange server. It resembles the inbox
program on Win95. If you have Exchange 5.5, you can legally use Outlook 2000
at no charge. (you may have to pay for the media)

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to get to Resource calendar


What is the Exchange client?  And we don't have Outlook 2000.

Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to get to Resource calendar


I would try with the Exchange client, perhaps.

Or Outlook 2000.  or open Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch.  

William 


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to get to Resource calendar


Good morning,

Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4

We have a resource called OHR10.  When trying to access the calendar for
this resource via Outlook the workstation clocks.  We have to do a CTRL ALT
DEL to get out of this loop.

We can access this calendar from OWA without a problem.

We have tried to Import the mailbox to a PST but once again when the task
gets into Calendar it clocks the work station. And we once again have to
CTRL ALT DEL to get out.

Does anyone have any suggestions on making this work?

Have a great weekend.  

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



I 
thought it was clusterf@%*&

  -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering 
  Exchange
  WHOA
  

-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 
18, 2002 2:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Clustering Exchange
I 
did change it to ClusterKing
 
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
11:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Clustering Exchange
I don't feel wealthy.
 
%^)
 
Who ever thought up that silly name anyway?

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 
  January 18, 2002 1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering Exchange
  I think he means not all of us have the wealth of experience or 
  knowledge of clusters that someone with the monicker 'clusterboy' might 
  have.
   
  
  -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
  10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Clustering Exchange
  Huh?
   
  Can you elaborate?
  

-Original Message-From: Benjamin 
Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
January 17, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering Exchange

However, the 
level of "cluster-aware" is very dependant on the person that is setting 
it up.  I can think of some that I would not want setting up 
any types of clusters.

Ben 
Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems 
Administrator 
Peregrine 
Systems 

-Original 
Message-From: Rick 
Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 
12:52 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering 
Exchange
 
For 
5.5 I say NIYET - Is it doable but you gain no real advantages in doing 
it, as 5.5 isn't truly "cluster aware". 
For 
XCHG2000 I say DAH - "IF" you have a solid cluster solution with known 
HCL Server hardware. I recommend Compaq's cluster solutions as I have 
the most/best experiences with it overall and the FIBRE channel 
connectivity is SWEET.
XCHG2000 is cluster aware. 
Plan to spend lotsomoney on your hardware 
however.. it ain't cheap. 
-Rick -Original Message- 
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 
Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Clustering 
Exchange 
My 
immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new 
Exchange Servers that we should have them 
clustered.  Now I have never clustered servers before and wouldn't know 
how to start, but I just wanted to get everyone's opinions on the subject 
to begin with.  How hard is it to do, and how is it to maintain.  What 
are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be appreciated. 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5

[Scot Parsons]

Automating Online Backup
Use the following procedure to automate online backups of the information
store and directory service. 

>From the Microsoft Windows NT Resource Kit compact disc, install the
Winat.exe program on the local Windows NT directory of your local computer. 
Create a Windows NT common group called Microsoft Exchange Server Backup. 
Create an icon for the Backup.log file. This provides quick access to review
the backup log for review. 
Copy the Ntbackup.exe icon from the Administrative Tools group to the
Exchange Backup group. 
Create an icon for Winat.exe in the Exchange Backup group. 
In Windows NT Control Panel, double-click Services. 
Select the Schedule service, and then choose Startup. Configure for
automatic startup and assign an ID that is a member of the Windows NT Backup
Operators group. Make sure you enter the correct password. If the
administrator ID password changes, you must change the password for the
Schedule service. This account must also have "Admin Role" rights within the
Microsoft Exchange Organization Site and Configuration containers you are
backing up. 
Start the Schedule service. 
Create the backup batch file. Name this file Back.bat, and save it in the
Winnt subdirectory. 
Run the Winat.exe program, and then schedule the Back.bat file. You do not
need to have a logon session on the computer on which Winat.exe is running,
because the Schedule service logs on to perform the operation under the
defined security context. 
Set the batch job for interactive mode. 
Windows AT Command Scheduler 
When you use Windows AT Command Scheduler, the Windows NT Schedule service
runs all jobs that have been scheduled. Because batch jobs are run in the
context of the Schedule service, Windows NT security must be considered.
When configuring the Schedule service, configure the account as a member of
the Windows NT Backup Operators group. This enables a full backup of the
information store and directory.

Make sure the Back.bat jobs are set for interactive. This is required by the
Ntbackup.exe program.

Sample Batch File for Online Backup
The following is a sample batch file you can use for backing up your files
while the server remains online.

rem ** 3/7/96 Backup Written by 

rem ** This will back up the information store and directory service on
 and .

ntbackup backup DS \\Server_name1 IS \\Server_name1 /v /d "Server-name1
IS-DS" /b /t Normal /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e

ntbackup backup DS \\Server_name2 IS \\Server_name2 /a /v /d "Server_name2
IS-DS" /b /t Normal /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e

exit

Sample Batch Files for Offline Backup
The following are sample batch files you can use for backing up your files
when the server is offline. You may need to experiment with the order in
which you stop the services, so that you are not prompted when a service is
dependent upon the one you are stopping.

Example 1
rem ** Stop Microsoft Exchange services.

rem ** You can stop Microsoft Exchange services and restart them
automatically to backup.

rem ** Files that a particular service may hold open

REM // stop all services

echo Stopping Services...

net stop MSExchangeMSMI

net stop MSExchangePCMTA

net stop MSExchangeFB

net stop MSExchangeDX

net stop MSExchangeIMC

net stop MSExchangeMTA

net stop MSExchangeIS

net stop MSExchangeDS

net stop MSExchangeSA

ntbackup backup c:\ d:\ /a /v /d "Full File Based Backup" /b /l
c:\winnt\backup.log /e

REM edbutil OPTIONS

net start MSExchangeSA

net start MSExchangeDS

net start MSExchangeIS

net start MSExchangeMTA

net start MSExchangeIMC

net start MSExchangeDX

net start MSExchangeFB

net start MSExchangePCMTA

net start MSExchangeMSMI


Example 2
You can start and stop Microsoft Mail (PC) MTA (PCMTA) services by enclosing
the service name in quotation marks. You can determine the service names
from the Exchange Administrator program or Windows NT Control Panel, or by
viewing the Windows NT registry.

If you are viewing the Windows NT Registry, open the following registry key:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services

All services are listed in alphabetical order.

rem Batch File To Stop and Restart Microsoft Exchange Services

rem For File Based Backup

echo Stopping Services ...

net stop MSExchangeMSMI

net stop MSExchangePCMTA

net stop MSExchangeFB

net stop MSExchangeDX

net stop MSExchangeMTA

net stop MSExchangeIMC

net stop MSExchangeIS

net stop MSExchangeDS


net stop "PC MTA - HUB"

net stop MSExchangeSA


ntbackup BACKUP d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata /v /d "File Based Backup" /b /l
c:\winnt\backup.log /e

net start MSExchangeSA

net start MSExchangeDS

net start MSExchangeIS

net start MSExchangeMTA

net start MSExchangeIMC

net start MSExchangeDX

net start MSExchangeFB

net start MSExchangePCMTA

net start MSExchangeMSMI

net start "PC MTA - HUB"

-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: NTBACKUP command line pa

exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

[Scot Parsons]

Here we go again... I'll take one of them Guinesses.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: My recent $*#($#@($&#


here here guiness for all
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Macdonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#


> ELY??!!! Serve lite beer?! Blasphemy!
>
> --- Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Awe. come on, it's Friday.  Give the guy a break.
> > It's not like he invited
> > us all over and served lite beer.
> >
> >
> > mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
> > Steve Ropiak
> > ZF Group NAO
> > CERT, Exchange Administrator
> > (207) 989-9115 voice
> > (207) 989-8722 fax
> > (513) 317-0197 cell
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:37 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I know, but damn...  First time in my career
> > I've used the stupid
> > thing and I just wanted the company to know I was
> > gone.  Instead, I let the
> > entire world know.  Ah well, it won't happen again
> > and there's an exchange
> > admin still looking for his tail as we speak...  ;o)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Don Ely
> > Network Engineer
> > Tripath Imaging, Inc.
> > (336) 290-8293 - Direct
> > (336) 516-4519 - Mobile
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
> > http://www.tripathimaging.com
> > 
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:39 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#
> >
> >
> >
> > If you don't know what he's referring to, I wouldn't
> > worry about it.  Some
> > of us though, had a little grin when it happened :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > Don't worry Don, it happens at least once to the
> > best of us.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ben Winzenz, MCSE
> >
> > Network/Systems Administrator
> >
> > Peregrine Systems
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Carpenter
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:36 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#
> >
> >
> >
> > What are you referring to? You didn't include it in
> > your reply
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:27 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: My recent $*#($#@($&#
> >
> > Sorry all, I don't manage the exchange servers and
> > didn't know they allowed
> > this kind of crap.  They don't now!
> >
> > Don Ely
> > Network Engineer
> > Tripath Imaging, Inc.
> > (336) 290-8293 - Direct
> > (336) 516-4519 - Mobile
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
> >  
> > http://www.tripathimaging.com
> >
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange list
> > charter.htm
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange list
> > charter.htm
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange list
> > charter.htm
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange list
> > charter.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange list
> > charter.htm
> >
> >
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Got something to say? Say it better with Yahoo! Video Mail
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
>

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: We've been before . . . PST cracking

[Scot Parsons]

Title: We've been before . . . PST cracking



Now 
you're a crack whore.

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 
  3:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: We've 
  been before . . . PST cracking
  www.lostpassword.com for a retail 
  product.
   
  Otherwise, search for the utility that updates the 
  pst schema to the most recent version, which, when used, removes the 
  password requirement.
  pstupg19.exe if I recall.
   
  William 
  
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 
February 21, 2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: We've been before . . . PST 
cracking
We have an employee who was requested to leave, 
now they want into his password protected PST.  What was the link to 
the util that would let us in?
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 
fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



He's 
probably monitoring you on this list to make sure you're not joining the 
beer/Scotch discussions.
 

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
  2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  5.5 Question
  Taken from Medaille.edu's email 
  policy:
   
  "You 
  must respect the confidentiality of other people's electronic mail and must 
  not attempt to read, "hack" into other systems or other people's logins, or 
  "crack" passwords, or breach computer or network security 
  measures."
   
  They 
  forgot to include "except management".
  
-Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:21 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
5.5 Question

Wow...
 
-Original 
Message-From: Bob 
Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:31 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Re: 
Exchange 5.5 Question
 
sure 
doesmonitors everything except e-mail which we all know he now 
wants...

- Original 
Message - 

From: Allen 
Crawford 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Monday, February 
25, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
Question
 
Or 
hire better managers.  That's 
their job.  Employees goof off, 
whether it is on the phone, too many breaks, etc.  Does he monitor phone calls 
too?
 
-Original 
Message-From: Milton R 
Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:39 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 Question
 
Your boss should 
Hire better people if he feels the need to police them. Or fire the people 
he suspects.
 
Milton R 
Dogg
Of The Dogg 
Foundation
 
-Original 
Message-From: Bob 
Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:35 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Exchange 
5.5 Question

Hello 
everyone,
 
i was wondering if 
there is a way to have a copy of everyones incoming and outgoing mail sent 
to a generic mailbox without the user knowing.  my boss at another 
company wants a copy of every piece of e-mail coming in and going out sent 
to a "generic" mailbox that only he has access to.  
 
any help/info is 
appreciated
 
thanks,
Bob 
C.
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question



When 
his boss figures that out, the poor guy's next project will be to crunch the 
e-mails in some type of report writer to ease his snooping. 
 
 
I've 
been there before. My former boss wanted e-mail, voicemail, yesterdays 
pantiesyou name it.

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
  1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  5.5 Question
  I 
  can't imagine someone going through the 2200 emails I get per 
  day.
  
-Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 Question
Is he a spy?. He should be too busy for that. 

-Original Message- From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25/02/2002 17:44 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
Question 
Why even that?  What about journaling? ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct 
dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com 
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor" 
|-+> | 
|   "David N. 
Precht"| | 
|   
 | 
|   
o.com>   
| | 
|    
| | 
|   02/25/2002 
10:53 | | 
|   
AM   
| | 
|   Please respond 
to| | 
|   
"MS-Exchange | | 
|   Admin 
Issues"    | | 
|    
| |-+> 
  
>--|
  
|  
|
  |   
To:   "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
|
  |   
cc:    
|
  |   Subject:  
RE: Exchange 5.5 
Question    
|
  
>--|List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



My 
former boss wanted to monitor his boss. Imagine the position I was 
in.

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:10 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
  Question
  Yeah 
  I think this is a case when someone higher up needs to get involved. Does this 
  person have the right to just decide to read all mail in the company? There 
  are always legal issues with reading financial information, etc on a company, 
  even from within. I would definitely raise a flag on this.
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
February 25, 2002 1:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Which would 
imply that unless said boss has written permission, he is in violation and 
could be terminated.

  
  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 
  2002 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
  Taken from Medaille.edu's email 
  policy:
   
  "You must respect the confidentiality of other 
  people's electronic mail and must not attempt to read, "hack" into other 
  systems or other people's logins, or "crack" passwords, or breach computer 
  or network security measures."
   
  They forgot to include "except 
  management".
  
-Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
10:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 Question

Wow...
 
-Original 
Message-From: Bob 
Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
11:31 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Exchange 5.5 
Question
 
sure 
doesmonitors everything except e-mail which we all know he now 
wants...

- Original 
Message - 

From: Allen 
Crawford 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Monday, 
February 25, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 
5.5 Question
 
Or 
hire better managers.  
That's their job.  
Employees goof off, whether it is on the phone, too many breaks, 
etc.  Does he monitor phone 
calls too?
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
9:39 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
 
Your boss 
should Hire better people if he feels the need to police them. Or fire 
the people he suspects.
 
Milton R 
Dogg
Of The Dogg 
Foundation
 
-Original 
Message-From: Bob 
Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
6:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
Exchange 5.5 Question

Hello 
everyone,
 
i was 
wondering if there is a way to have a copy of everyones incoming and 
outgoing mail sent to a generic mailbox without the user knowing.  
my boss at another company wants a copy of every piece of e-mail coming 
in and going out sent to a "generic" mailbox that only he has access 
to.  
 
any help/info 
is appreciated
 
thanks,
Bob 
C.
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

SMTP Problem

[Scot Parsons]

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT SP6a. Mail Essentials on a seperate box as a gateway
to Exchange server.

I'm having trouble with users in remote offices relaying mail through our
Exchange server. The users are not connected through leased lines. They
share an internet connection with local technical colleges(local to them,
not me). I've set the Mail Essentials box and the Exchange box to allow
relaying only to clients that authenticate. I've tested both boxes with with
two of those wonderful blackhole sites, and they passed.

The remote clients can pop their mail, but cannot send mail even though
they've set the client software(Outlook Express)to authenticate. 

Also, I had the same problem with some Macs, but only here at the main site.
The authentication check box in the client fixed those.

What am I forgetting? I'm sure it will be something simple, but I'm stumped.


Scot




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SMTP Problem

[Scot Parsons]

This is the client error message. 

The rejected email was [EMAIL PROTECTED] test 
Account mail01.scetv.org, server mail01.scetv.org 
protocol: smtp, server response "550 relaying is prohibited" , port: 25,
secure [ssl] : no, server error. 550, error #0x800ccc79

The server error log message is shorter, something like
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] not allowed to relay". I'm at home, so I don't have
the log in front of me to look at.

Scot




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is it worth the extra expense?

[Scot Parsons]

If I were going to spend that much more, I'd put in a fourth drive instead.

-Original Message-
From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is it worth the extra expense?


We are looking to purchase a Compaq Proliant ML370 1.2GHz, 512mb Ram with 3
x 36.4GB Hard drives in a raid 5 for our new Exchange Server.
Is it worth the extra Expense to go for the 15,000rpm hard drives over the
10,000 rpm hard drives? The extra cost would be about £950 that's $1345.
Would we see much extra performance?

We are only a small company at the moment with 50 users.

Your thoughts would be very welcome

Kevan Dickinson
Network Engineer
Oxford Natural Products Plc
The Stable Block
Cornbury Park
Charlbury
Oxfordshire
OX7 3EH

Tel:  +44 1608 813300
Dir:  +44 1608 81
Fax: +44 1608 813301

www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com
Company No: 3554809



*
This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service
*


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: ORBZ shutting down.

[Scot Parsons]

I wish they put as much energy into catching the spammers as they do
bothering us.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ORBZ shutting down.


And for those of us who pretty much dislike them, Yeah!

-Original Message-
From: Ed Santiago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ORBZ shutting down.


For those that have been doing relay testing with ORBZ. Here is some sad
news.


From: ORBZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 03:20:25 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ORBZ-Secondary] Shutdown
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed Mar 20
12:01:39 2002
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
 
Here's the email that those of you with forward sight
have been fearing since the inception of ORBZ.
 
As of this moment, ORBZ is shutting down.  DNS zones
are going to stop resolving, the website will disappear
and mail will stop working (so furthur discussion on
this list probably won't work -- use NANAE).
 
I dont want to disappear in silence like ORBS, so I'll
try for as much description as possible without
compromising my own position.
 
I received an official court notice this afternoon to
turn over all information relation to ORBZ accounts.
This came from the 10th Judicial District court of the
State of Michigan.  It appears that ORBZ may be facing
criminal charges for denial of service relating to the
Lotus Domino issue.
 
I was happy to try to weather any civil issues that may
have come up, and I was committed to seeing it through.
However, the threat of jail time is too much; I don't
believe in this fight quite that much.
 
Thank you all for all your support.  I sincerely hope
that someone with the goal of carrying on the mission
of ORBZ pops up in another country with a less
foreboding legal system.  Anyone who has copies of the
current zones may do with them what they wish.
 
For those of you stuck without good spam filtering,
please consider ORDB and SpamCop; they both provide
excellent free solutions.

Ian Gulliver
ORBZ

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Slightly OT

[Scot Parsons]

Anyone know of any 
good books/references on Network Monitor?
 
Scot
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange server reboot simple q

[Scot Parsons]

And while it dies, find out why and fix it. Servers don't just run at their
optimum level for x number of days and then die. 

-Original Message-
From: Beasley, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q


wear the badge and let the server die!

-Original Message-
From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q


This is a religious thing more then something that people will listen to
logic on. Those of us that know what we are doing, and run big always on
shops where 4 9's is not enough. DO NOT REBOOT on a schedule just
because. Some of you who grew up in win 9x where reboots were a good
thing, and have applied that logic to Servers for the sole reason that
is a Microsoft product will not be swayed by logic, case studies, flows
of memory management or another other system. 

Let us drop this now before I become annoyed with people trying to tell
others that they reboot all the time. Adding more confusing to the
people learning as they go from this list.

The opinion of those that answer most of the Questions on this list is
to NOT reboot unless you have applied a SP and need to. Having servers
going for more then a year with out a reboot is a badge of honor to be
worn with pride. 

Thank you

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q


I disagree. Stating that a monthly reboot shows signs of instability is
not a sound statement. It depends on your needs and concerns. If he said
on a weekly basis, I would agree...
-Original Message- 
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q 
Do you have proof that is does anything? 
--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond 
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! 


-Original Message- 
From: Beasley, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:23 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q 


We reboot to clear memory on a biweekly basis.. 
-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:12 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q 



I don't reboot unless I absolutely have to.  This includes network 
equipment as well as servers.  If you have to reboot things on a monthly

basis for "network stability", there is an underlying problem that 
should be addressed. 
~ 
-K.Borndale 
IT Manager 
Sybari Software 
631.630.8569 -direct dial 
631.439.0689 -fax 
http://www.sybari.com 
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor" 


|-+> 
| |   "Joe Irvine" | 
| | | 
| || 
| |   04/01/2002 11:53 | 
| |   AM   | 
| |   Please respond to| 
| |   "MS-Exchange | 
| |   Admin Issues"| 
| || 
|-+> 
  
>---

> 
---|

  | 
| 
  |   To:   "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
| 
  |   cc: 
| 
  |   Subject:  RE: Exchange server reboot simple q 
| 
  
>---

> 
---|





I cold-boot my entire network once a month.. it works wonders for 
network stability. 


Thanks! 
Joe Irvine 
Director of Information Technology 
The Business Office, Inc. 
(609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 
www.tbopayroll.com 


-Original Message- 
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:46 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Exchange server reboot simple q 


Just curious-- how often do people reboot their exchange servers?  Or do

you?  Our exchange server has been up for 7 months straight now w/o a 
reboot. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to reboot it every now

and then-- free up any memory leakages, etc..  Is it necessary, or can I

let it just keep chugging away until it is necessary?  Any input, 
thoughts, etc. would be great.  Thanks. 
paul green 
seattle 


--- 
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. 
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). 
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Releas

RE: Sorry test with new subscription

[Scot Parsons]

I'm glad I don't have to spell his name.

-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


Jeez guys...drop YOU into Belgium and see how far you get...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


Then work on your spelling

-Original Message-
From: mark verschaeve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 7:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sorry test with new subscription


I 'm trying to sove my posting problem!




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sorry test with new subscription

[Scot Parsons]

You just ruined my day.

-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


Early one morning in Brussels, leaving a news stand with a pack of smokes, I
encountered a tall, thin, absolutely stunning minx in leopard tights and
heels going the other direction.  Our eyes met briefly...and I blushed as I
realized he hadn't shaved for three days...

-Original Message-
From: Rybski Dajo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


Man, is that the only thing you can say about Belgium?
Gee, we've had some really ugly political scandals too, you know, but do you
mention those? Oh no!

;)

Dajo


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 april 2002 17:19
Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Onderwerp: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


Insert "Hitchhiker" joke here... 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


What is wrong with Belgium?

--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Rybski Dajo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


I'll second that.
:p

Dajo


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 april 2002 17:08
Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Onderwerp: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


Jeez guys...drop YOU into Belgium and see how far you get...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sorry test with new subscription


Then work on your spelling

-Original Message-
From: mark verschaeve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 7:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sorry test with new subscription


I 'm trying to sove my posting problem!




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Making email delete itself

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



I 
haven't heard of it, but you would think it would trigger some anti-virus 
products.

  -Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:44 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Making email 
  delete itself
  My CEO has 
  been told by a colleague that there is an Outlook 2000 add-on that 
  will remove messages past a preset expiration date, no matter where the 
  message has been sent.  He's getting info on the name of this application 
  at my request.  Has anyone ever heard of an app that will actually 
  do this?
   
  TIA,
  
  Eric 
  Holliday
  Exchange Administrator
  Corporate Information Systems
  Logistics Management Institute
   
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
  
  
  
  "Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we will" 
  
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?



Is 
IIS/OWA running on the Exchange box?
 
 
-Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 
10, 2002 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?

If the target is IIS, then NAV 
running LiveUpdate on the server can handle 
that.
 
-- 

Matt 
Lathrum
General 
Dynamics Decision Systems    

 
When cryptography is outlawed,
 
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
 
-Original 
Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:58 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
What if 
the target of the virus is not a desktop? What if the target is IIS? How will a 
desktop handle that. You need AV on the servers. It does not degrade 
functionality or stability so much as to let that slide.
 
-Original 
Message-From: Lathrum 
Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:21 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
This is not being helpful.  It is a 
serious question.  Any viruses that actually get through Trend on the 
firewall will most likely get cleaned by NAV on the desktop.  This seems to 
make AV on the server itself not necessary.
 
Matt
 
-Original 
Message-From: Clayton 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:17 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
Hi, here is a 
target on my head, beat me, beat me. DOH!
-Original 
Message-From: Lathrum 
Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the 
Exchange server necessary?
Do you have anything more to add to back up your 
statement?
 
Matt
 
-Original 
Message-From: Micciche, 
Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
I think it's ridiculous.  

-Original Message- From: 
Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? 

 
Our environment has Trend running on the 
firewall for anti-virus and content filtering.  We have NAV running on the 
desktops.  We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put 
on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN).  
However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers 
themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability 
(particularly Symantec's product).  He said that when a virus outbreak 
occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as 
effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product.
With AV software on the firewall and on 
the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers 
themselves?
-- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics 
Decision Systems    
 
When cryptography is outlawed, 
 
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. 
 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and 
FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and 
FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?



That's 
my point. IIS makes the Exchange box susceptible to attack. To me, the most 
critical data is on the Exchange box and I want my protection with that 
data.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 
10, 2002 2:31 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?

Well, IIS is 
required on Exchange.
 
-- 

Matt 
Lathrum
General 
Dynamics Decision Systems    

 
When cryptography is outlawed,
 
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
 
-Original 
Message-From: Scot Parsons 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:28 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
Is IIS/OWA 
running on the Exchange box?
 
 
-Original 
Message-From: Lathrum 
Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:24 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
If the 
target is IIS, then NAV running LiveUpdate on the server can handle 
that.
 
-- 

Matt 
Lathrum
General 
Dynamics Decision Systems    

 
When cryptography is outlawed,
 
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
 
-Original 
Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:58 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
What if 
the target of the virus is not a desktop? What if the target is IIS? How will a 
desktop handle that. You need AV on the servers. It does not degrade 
functionality or stability so much as to let that slide.
 
-Original 
Message-From: Lathrum 
Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:21 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
This is not being helpful.  It is a 
serious question.  Any viruses that actually get through Trend on the 
firewall will most likely get cleaned by NAV on the desktop.  This seems to 
make AV on the server itself not necessary.
 
Matt
 
-Original 
Message-From: Clayton 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:17 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
Hi, here is a 
target on my head, beat me, beat me. DOH!
-Original 
Message-From: Lathrum 
Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the 
Exchange server necessary?
Do you have anything more to add to back up your 
statement?
 
Matt
 
-Original 
Message-From: Micciche, 
Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus 
protection on the Exchange server necessary?
 
I think it's ridiculous.  

-Original Message- From: 
Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? 

 
Our environment has Trend running on the 
firewall for anti-virus and content filtering.  We have NAV running on the 
desktops.  We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put 
on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN).  
However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers 
themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability 
(particularly Symantec's product).  He said that when a virus outbreak 
occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as 
effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product.
With AV software on the firewall and on 
the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers 
themselves?
-- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics 
Decision Systems    
 
When cryptography is outlawed, 
 
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. 
 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and 
FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and 
FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and 
FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbe

RE: E-mail policy

[Scot Parsons]

Thou shalt not spam.
Thou shalt not do anything to get the mail admin in trouble.

-Original Message-
From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E-mail policy


Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy
Manual?

Stefan Jafs
Amico Corporation
www.amico.com
1-877-GO-AMICO

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: E-mail policy

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Could 
someone tell me how to service my wife.
 
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:43 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail 
policy
Hey 
guys... I need a server configured over here.  Anyone have a good config I 
could use?

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail 
  policy
  
  It depends on your 
  org needs. If I have a 100 MB mailbox limit, that may be too low for you. 
  
   
  Acceptable language?? 
  Use common sense. How do you plan to monitor that anyway?
   
  File size limits? 
  Depends on your servers capabilities and bandwidth.
   
  Personal Usage? How 
  do you plan to monitor that? 
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Stefan 
  Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail 
  policy
   
  
  Seriously guys why 
  reinvent the wheel, I need to have a policy for:
  
   
  
  - 
  Personal usage
  
  - 
  Storage limits
  
  - File 
  size limits
  
  - Acceptable 
  language.
  
   
  
  Stefan
  
   
  
   
  Stefan 
  Jafs
  Amico 
Corporation
  www.amico.com
  1-877-GO-AMICO
  
-Original 
Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 
15:22To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail 
policy
Concerning what? 
Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? 
 
-Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, 
April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy 

Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use 
for my Company Policy Manual? 
Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Limiting Internet Email

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Create 
a new mailbox. Sneak into his office and point his Outlook to the new mailbox. 
That takes care of incoming. Now someone needs to take care of 
outgoing.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Limiting 
Internet Email

Don, I don't think we 
can satisfy his needs. I am not sure why one would do his ideas anyway. I can 
only think of ways to dump mail too, but not "queue" it. Not without a 
3rd party app
 
-Original 
Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:57 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Limiting 
Internet Email
 

Well 
another idea is a send mail server in front of the exchange server sending 
internet mail to dev/null.  No matter what way you look at it, it would be 
time consuming.  Sounds like some needs new 
users...

 

 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  -Original 
  Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:13 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Limiting 
  Internet Email
  That is a VERY time consuming idea. You are suggesting 
  something that is a bit granular. You would have to enter each SENDER address 
  to achieve what he is asking for. Plus, he is asking to QUEUE these messages, 
  not reject them. I will have to think about this one.
  -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, 
  April 11, 2002 5:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Limiting Internet 
  Email 
  Delivery Restrictions on the IMC...  Add them 
  there... 
   
  Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. 
  (336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct (336) 
  516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
  http://www.tripathimaging.com 
  
  -Original Message- From: Gabe Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, 
  April 11, 2002 6:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Limiting Internet 
  Email 
   
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 on WinNT4 
  Is it possible to cutoff internet email individually. 
  What I would like to do is for that person's sent internet email to be held 
  up in the queue if possible. His incoming email to be held in the queue 
  also. Is this possible? 
  Also how do you cut internet mail site wide from being 
  sent but, still accept outside email? Can this be done? 
  
  I need this for only about 4 hours. 
   
  Thanks, 
  Gabe 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is somebody reading my email?

[Scot Parsons]

Check the application log in event viewer.

-Original Message-
From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is somebody reading my email?



I have a user whom believes his email maybe being read by a third party (his
IT supplier) his environment is NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5.

Is it possible to "track" who looks at an email rather than just read/unread
status's?

In the perfect world he's looking to log and review whom opens or reads his
email. They will have admin rights over his mail box.

Any pointers are welcome.

regards


Steve Wyman

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Backup/Restore using Windows 2000 NTBackup

[Scot Parsons]

If I remember correctly, the NTBackup that is included with NT 4.0 is a
"lite" version of Backup Exec. It will perform an online backup of Exchange.
I think 2000 is the same. I'm not sure if this can be done remotely without
the Veritas version. Someone please jump in if I'm wrong. 

-Original Message-
From: Dan Phan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup/Restore using Windows 2000 NTBackup


Hi everyone,
I am just wondering if anyone has experience in working with NTBackup that
comes with Windows 2000.  Does it perform online backup of the Exchange
Server 5.5?
NTBackup, developed by Veritas (the same people who developed Backup Exec)
for Microsoft specs claims that it does "Online Microsoft Exchange Server
Protection" both locally or remotely.
We have Arcserve 2000 and I am hesitant to use their Exchange Backup Agent
because of it is a pain to work with.
Any sucessful/unsucessful stories using this tool for backup/restore
Exchange Server 5.5 will be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Dan

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Backup/Restore using Windows 2000 NTBackup

[Scot Parsons]

Thanks. I haven't used NTBackup to backup Exchange in a while. 

-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup/Restore using Windows 2000 NTBackup


I do remote backups of Exchange 5.5 using NTBACKUP regularly, from both NT 4
and 2000 machines.

-Original Message-
From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup/Restore using Windows 2000 NTBackup


If I remember correctly, the NTBackup that is included with NT 4.0 is a
"lite" version of Backup Exec. It will perform an online backup of Exchange.
I think 2000 is the same. I'm not sure if this can be done remotely without
the Veritas version. Someone please jump in if I'm wrong. 

-Original Message-
From: Dan Phan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup/Restore using Windows 2000 NTBackup


Hi everyone,
I am just wondering if anyone has experience in working with NTBackup that
comes with Windows 2000.  Does it perform online backup of the Exchange
Server 5.5?
NTBackup, developed by Veritas (the same people who developed Backup Exec)
for Microsoft specs claims that it does "Online Microsoft Exchange Server
Protection" both locally or remotely.
We have Arcserve 2000 and I am hesitant to use their Exchange Backup Agent
because of it is a pain to work with.
Any sucessful/unsucessful stories using this tool for backup/restore
Exchange Server 5.5 will be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Dan

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Listserve(s) for Exchange -- - vs. Linux

[Scot Parsons]

Try Arrow www.jadebox.com



-Original Message-
From: david burrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Listserve(s) for Exchange -- - vs. Linux


I need to set up a few small listserve(s) for our non-profit.  Our current
email server is Exchange 5.5 (win2k Server). I also have a Linux sendmail
server for test and development purposes. Is there a stable Exchange
compatible product, or should I set up the listserve of my linux R/Hat
box?  Is it possible to import my address books/mailing lists to the Linux
box from Exchange?  Or is it better to run all of our email from the
Exchange server?  We are a small organization with only 10 users/client
email accounts.
tia,
David Burrows
Communications Director
Pacific NorthWest Economic Region
Seattle, WA

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen Content Filter

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Speaking 
of content filtering, you guys remember this 
post from about a year ago? It has some interesting examples of the problems 
with filtering.
 
 
 
 

LOL!!!
 
Well, 
my last potty post was a success.
 
I 
think I'm all done now (before I exceed the bounds of whatever good taste I have 
left).
 
-ASB

  -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:36 
  PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: What is 
  this?
  I'm 
  working very hard on this 
  project.
  
-Original Message-From: Baker, Andrew 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:26 
PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: What is 
this?
LOL!!! 
How long are you guys going to keep the crap up? 
You can be assured that someone's pisspoor content filtering 
system will be screwed up. 
-ASB   
-Original Message- From: 
William S. Kuhn [MCSE] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What 
is this? 
Butt why? 
-Original Message- From: 
Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 2:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What 
is this? 
I need some ass istance with that breast recipe 
-Original Message- From: 
Burgess, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 12:38 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: 
RE: What is this? 
 Someone should post a chicken breast recipe...  
:)  LOL!    I've been blocked by 
corporate "content filters" at more than a few recipe sites because of that. 
 -Original Message- From:   Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:39 
AM To: NT System Admin 
Issues Subject:    RE: What is 
this? 
What is it? It is why I don't believe in content 
filtering! 
-Original Message- From: 
John Theed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 6:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: What is 
this? 
This came back to me about a message I sent to the list.. 
Wierd. 
I received the message via the list, so I do not understand 
why this came back! 
At the bottom is the original message ** John 
 
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive 
content. 
Place = NT System Admin Issues; ; ; NT System Admin Issues 
Sender = John Theed Subject = Win2K Connect via 
Dial-up Delivery Time = May 22, 2001 (Tuesday) 
08:10:48 Policy = Dirty Words Action on this mail = Quarantine 
message 
Warning message from administrator: Sender:  Do _NOT_ send messages with this type of content!  
Your message has not been delivered to the intended 
recipient. 
___ NOTICE:  The 
information contained in this electronic transmission is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 
455.251 and 3905.017.  It is intended solely 
for the use of the recipient named above. If the 
reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure 
of this transmission is prohibited. 
** indows 2000 Workstation with 
SP1 
Modem installed and working properly after logging 
in. 
I need to connect to the domain via dial-up until the frame 
relay is installed. When the computer is booted and 
you are logged in locally, you can access the modem 
perfectly. However, when you try to use 'Log on using dial-up connection' , I get my selection of dial up 
connections, the name and password screen, but it 
can not use the modem. I get the following: Error 
692 There was a hardware failure in the modem (or other connecting device). What am I missing? 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Create 
a rule to forward all mistress mail to wifee.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL postmaster 
errors

Actually the bosses wife has an aol 
account.  Or is it the bosses mistress...  
Well one of them does.  He'll 
be pissed if cant receive his booty call emails.
 
-Original 
Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 
2002 3:58 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL postmaster 
errors
 

LOL,  
Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the company.  :-P  
He'd love that one.

  -Original 
  Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  
  Just 
  block *@aol.com in the message filtering section of IMS properties.  
  :o)
  
   
  
-Original 
Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
postmaster errors

Yep,  I have a 
client whose email address was being spoofed used as the return address for 
spam.  He would average between 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains 
and I know he wasn't sending it out.

 

We had 
to change his Email Address to get it to stop.  


  -Original 
  Message-From: Sethi, 
  Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  Has anyone seen this 
  before?  It looks like someone 
  is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails 
  out.  We have NAV for Exchange 
  blocking all attachements that are suspect to be virus attachments.  The users is complaining that she 
  is getting a ton of these post master errors.  Any suggestions on how to 
  eliminate this?  We are not 
  setup as relaying.
  Exhange 5.5 
  sp4
  Windows 2k sp2 
  sr1
   
  Thanks,
   
   
  The original message 
  was received at Fri, 19 Apr 
  2002 
  15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from 
  logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132]
   
   
  *** ATTENTION 
  ***
   
  Your e-mail is being 
  returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery.  The address which was 
  undeliverable is listed in the section
  labeled: "- The 
  following addresses had permanent fatal errors 
  -".
   
  The reason your mail 
  is being returned to you is listed in the 
  section
  labeled: "- 
  Transcript of Session Follows -".
   
  The line beginning 
  with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be 
  delivered.  The next line 
  contains a second error message which is a general translation for other 
  e-mail servers.
   
  Please direct further 
  questions regarding this message to your e-mail 
  administrator.
   
  --AOL 
  Postmaster
   
   
   
     - The following 
  addresses had permanent fatal errors - 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   
     - Transcript of session 
  follows -
  550 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Host unknown (Name server: 
  sabertooth.victim.net: host not found)
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set ting up a new user

[Scot Parsons]

I can ping that thong real strong.
Then she might break out in song.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when
set ting up a new user


Can you ping it in thong?
Can you ping it with a bong?

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set
ting up a new user


Can you ping it from a moat?
Can you ping it in a boat?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 
> server when set ting up a new user
> 
> 
> Can you ping the server by name? Can you ping the server by
> IP? Can you ping
> any other servers by name?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Fjelsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:09 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server 
> when setting
> up a new user
> 
> 
> I am having a problem resolving the name of an exchange
> server on a newly
> added computer.
> * Exchange server is 5.5 SP4.
> * The Exchange server is runing on W2k with the latest service packs.
> * If I log onto the new user directly on the Exchange server 
> box I can use
> outlook 2000 and specify the Exchange server name and the 
> mailbox name for
> the user and it works fine.
> * if I go to the new user's machine and attempt to set up the 
> server access
> I.E. type in the name and use the check name button the 
> server is not found.
> * The new user's machine is joined to the domain where the 
> exchange server
> resides.
> * Even if I log on asa domain  administrator on the new 
> machine and try and
> resolve the Exchange server name it is not found.
> * I tried the removal of the TCP/IP protocol which is noted 
> in the Microsoft
> knowledge base and then re adding it again. THis did not 
> solve the problem.
> 
> * I can access and use domain resources from the new machine.
> * What is the problem?
> Kevin Fjelsted
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Preventing External Email

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



It's 
cheaper to get 64k with 8k CIR. The port will generally use 64k when it's 
needed.
 
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 11:28 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Preventing 
External Email

How do you get an 8K 
connection with a remote site? Isn't even serial faster than that? Is it a 
greased shoelace?
 
-Original 
Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:12 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Preventing 
External Email
 

8k  
Yikes!!!  Might I suggest a modem?  ;o)

 

 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:11 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Preventing External Email
  
  some are 
  8k CIR
  
-Original 
Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:03 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Preventing External Email

OoooKkkk... well, 
in that case, you'll have to restrict that user on all of the 
IMC's.

 

How 
slow are the links we're talking about?  64k?  128k?  
256k?

 

 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:06 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Preventing External Email
  
  i 
  use x.400 connectors to each site cuz some sites are on slow 
  links
  
  each 
  site has its own IMS so it will send to the internet using a local SMTP 
  server instead of comming all the way back to one central 
  place.
  
-Original 
Message-From: Ely, 
Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:58 
AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Preventing External Email

What kind of 
Site Connectors are you using?

 

 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 
emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 
  10:02 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Preventing External 
  Email
  
  same org , 15 
  different sites.
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 
8:53 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Preventing 
External Email

Might we 
ask why?  Are they all a part of the same org or 
site?

 

 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 
emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  -Original 
  Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 
  9:58 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Preventing 
  External Email
  
  i have 15 
  servers, each with an IMC
  
-Original 
Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 
2002 8:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: 
RE: Preventing External Email

Set it 
only on IMC's.   Jeez, how many do you have?  I 
usually have no more than three and two is usually enough for 
redundancy...

 

 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 
290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - 
Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  -Original 
  Mes

RE: Restricting OWA

[Scot Parsons]

Are you going to prevent them from e-mailing messages and attachments
outside the office?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWA


then I would have to get 100 of them.  No, that would not work.

Management (the evil empire), is concerned that some unscrupulous sales guy
might save confidential spreadsheets on their home computers while using OWA
and thereby breeching our impenetrable wall of security.

We have ordered a "dome-of-silence" (vague Get Smart reference) for the
conference room, but it hasn't arrived yet.

Dan Munley
MIS Department
(201)930-0100 ext. 308


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWA


Get a new user???  ;o)


Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricting OWA


Server: WinNT4 SP6 Exch 5.5 SP4

Is there a way to restrict the user, on his local (remote) machine, from
saving emails or attachments to the local machine?

We want the user to be able to see and respond to their email but not save
local copies or the attachments.

Thanks in advance

Dan Munley

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Restricting OWE

[Scot Parsons]

We know that. We're just feeling your pain.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWE


Thank you all for your comments.  I am well aware that preventing users from
saving email and attachments from OWA would only provide a false sense of
security and that determined users will always try and find a way.

But I posted the question seeking the knowledge of whether it could be done
and how.  Not whether it was a smart thing to do.I kind of already
formed an opinion regarding that when the question was initially asked of
me.

Dan Munley
MIS Department



-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWA


If management is that paranoid, is your Exchange Server restricted to
internal mail only?  If not people inside the office can potentially send
attachments to anyone in the world.  So the issue is bigger than just OWA.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWA


No. And this is not a trick question.  When offering OWA as a solution for
providing remote email, this apparently is managements big stumbling block
before giving the go-ahead.

Dan Munley
MIS Department
(201)930-0100 ext. 308


-Original Message-
From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWA


Are you going to prevent them from e-mailing messages and attachments
outside the office?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWA


then I would have to get 100 of them.  No, that would not work.

Management (the evil empire), is concerned that some unscrupulous sales guy
might save confidential spreadsheets on their home computers while using OWA
and thereby breeching our impenetrable wall of security.

We have ordered a "dome-of-silence" (vague Get Smart reference) for the
conference room, but it hasn't arrived yet.

Dan Munley
MIS Department
(201)930-0100 ext. 308


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting OWA


Get a new user???  ;o)


Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricting OWA


Server: WinNT4 SP6 Exch 5.5 SP4

Is there a way to restrict the user, on his local (remote) machine, from
saving emails or attachments to the local machine?

We want the user to be able to see and respond to their email but not save
local copies or the attachments.

Thanks in advance

Dan Munley

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Setting another user's OOO

[Scot Parsons]

OWA

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Setting another user's OOO

You could write a script to do it :)

From: bounce-8459158-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8459158-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Joe 
Heaton
Sent: 16 March 2009 15:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Setting another user's OOO

I need to set the Out Of Office for a user that has departed.  Do I have to 
login to a computer as that user to do this?

Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
jhea...@etp.ca.gov








~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: How to recall a message that went to a user's blackberry

[Scot Parsons]

Hi, Joe. Is that a blackberry...cool! Can I see it? Click click delete click 
click.

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to recall a message that went to a user's blackberry

We normally tell the user that it is too late - they are welcome to attempt a 
recall but that normally fails much of the time for any number of reasons, BB 
or other PDA/Phone sync, PST, rules, etc. etc.


From: Fergal O'Connell [mailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to recall a message that went to a user's blackberry

Remotely wiping the blackberry is an option I wanted to avoid doing...
Just wondering what other folks have done in the past ...

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 March 2009 17:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to recall a message that went to a user's blackberry

In BES, click the account.
Down below, click IT Admin. Then Erase Data and Disable Handheld.

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to recall a message that went to a user's blackberry

Question is, how do you do a remote user memory wipe?

Bottom line (IMHO) - once you've sent a message, consider it too late to do 
anything about it.


From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to recall a message that went to a user's blackberry

It's too late.
If you are on BES and in control of the BB, you could do a remote device wipe. 
That will certainly get rid of the email. But everything else as well.

From: Fergal O'Connell [mailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How to recall a message that went to a user's blackberry

Hi Folks,

Exchange 2007 SP1 CCR - > BES 4.1.5
I have a user who send a sensitive document to the wrong user..
I have manually removed the message from the users inbox but the user 
*probably* got that message on their blackberry.
Is there any quick way I can recall\delete this email from the BES?


Regards
Fergal O'Connell
ICT Support






The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else

is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance

on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended

addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.

















The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else

is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance

on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended

addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.







~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: owa and ssl cert

[Scot Parsons]

Got mine from https://www.certificatesforexchange.com/.

From: Jay Dale [mailto:jd...@xpresstel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: owa and ssl cert

If you create your own cert, you will have to install it into the Trusted Root 
Authorities on the PC accessing the site.  Unfortunately you would need to do 
it with every PC that accesses OWA.

My suggestion would be to get a 3rd party Trusted cert from someone like 
RapidSSL or GoDaddy.  They aren't that expensive, and will not only work with 
OWA but also if you plan on any future RPC over HTTPs setups.

Jay

From: Paul Everett [mailto:evere...@leementalhealth.org]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: owa and ssl cert

We've been using OWA without a certificate so today I created my own SSL Cert 
following these instructions: 
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/SSL_Enabling_OWA_2003.html
The problem is I can't access OWA if I have "require secured channel, SSL" 
enabled.  First I get a message saying there is a problem with the cert. 
because it isn't issued by a trusted authority.  That's ok.  I click to 
continue and get a message saying that the webpage is trying to open my trusted 
site.  That is ok, but when I click ok to continue I get "Internet Explorer 
cannot display the webpage".
If I remove the requirement for SSL and use http://mail./exchange it works 
fine.

I must be missing something, or perhaps go something wrong in the Cert?
Any ideas?

My goal is to get an iphone to sync up with our Exchange 2003 Server and just 
taking care of some details along the way.  Not having any luck with that 
either by the way.

Thanks,

Paul Everett
IS Dept.



"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center 
for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.  Visit our 
website at www.leementalhealth.orghttp://www.leementalhealth.org/> to 
learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message, including attachments.






~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

[Scot Parsons]

Isn't there also overhead to consider? If you send a 10MB message, exchange 
sees it as something like 12MB. Could an expert chime in on this?

From: Louis, Joe [mailto:jlo...@guardianalarm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

I have to agree with Sherry even though mine is 10mb. We have some reports that 
go out that border that.

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

I think that you're very generous actually, I limit size to 5mb.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Melahn 
mailto:den...@advancedav.com>> wrote:
Was just curious if I was being unreasonable to my Sales department with my 
firm stand on 10 meg.

Thanks,
Dennis


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



--
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

[Scot Parsons]

Just that if you want to allow 10MB attachments, you need to have a limit 
higher than 10MB. 

-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

Your point

-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

Well...if you attach a 10 meg file, the resulting email
(particularly when converted to SMTP) is likely to be 12-15 meg or more.

 



From: Scot Parsons [mailto:spars...@scetv.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 

Isn't there also overhead to consider? If you send a 10MB message,
exchange sees it as something like 12MB. Could an expert chime in on
this? 

 

From: Louis, Joe [mailto:jlo...@guardianalarm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 

I have to agree with Sherry even though mine is 10mb. We have some
reports that go out that border that.

 

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 

I think that you're very generous actually, I limit size to 5mb.  

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Melahn 
wrote:

Was just curious if I was being unreasonable to my Sales department with
my firm stand on 10 meg.

Thanks,
Dennis


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~




-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." 
Arthur C. Clarke

 

 

 

 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.50/2150 - Release Date: 06/11/09
05:53:00


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

All Staff Distribution Lists

[Scot Parsons]

We have a growing problem with users sending non-business related emails to the 
all staff list. What are your policies? Do you restrict user access to certain 
employees or handle it through management?

Scot Parsons
Systems Engineer
S.C. Educational Television
spars...@scetv.org
803-737-3251

RE: Exch2007 in ESX

[Scot Parsons]

I've been running 2007 on VMWare since January with no problems. Storage is on 
an EMC Cellerra SAN. VMs are on Dell 6950s. Mailbox store is around 200GB.

-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX

Oops...darned autocorrect. :-)

-Original Message-
From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exch2007 in ESX

Exchange 2007 is great visualized ;)

 _
John Bowles


- Original Message 
From: Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:56:05 AM
Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX

I virtualized everything.. Exchange 2007 works great visualized. It is even 
fully supported if you use Hyper-V

~Kevinm WLKMMAS
powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan?


-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exch2007 in ESX

Anyone virtualized Exchange 2007? I'm getting mixed opinions.. My Dell server 
guys are saying performance would suffer too much.  I also have a local 
integrator who is a VMware and MS Gold Partner and says they virtualize 
everything and that because my information store is only about 25GB for approx 
150 boxes I wouldn't have performance problems.  Thoughts?

Thanks,
Dennis


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~    http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~    http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Stuck in Queue

[Scot Parsons]

I have one domain that gets stuck in my queue(outgoing). I can receive mail 
from them just fine. We are a state agency in SC, and so are they. I talked to 
their admin and sent a test message. He said it never hit their Barracuda. I 
rebooted the Exchange server after hours and the message went. I sent another 
and it got stuck in the queue again. I get the following error in the queue 
viewer:

451 4.4.0 Primary target IP address responded with: "421 4.2.2 Connection 
dropped." Attempted failover to alternate host, but that did not succeed. 
Either there are no alternate hosts, or delivery failed to all alternate hosts.

Exchange 2007 SP1 plus all patches.
Postini receives all incoming.

Anyone seen this?

Scot Parsons


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Delayed Delivery

[Scot Parsons]

I have a user who uses delayed delivery several times a week. She sent one 
today scheduled to be sent June 30, but it went immediately. I looked in her 
sent items, and the item is labeled "This item has been marked to be delivered 
after Monday, June 30, 2008 10:00 AM." Any ideas? Exchange 2007 and Outlook 
2007.

Scot Parsons
Systems Engineer
S.C. Educational Television
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
803-737-3251


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Delayed Delivery

[Scot Parsons]

It got delivered. I tried one and set it to send an hour later and it worked as 
it was supposed to.

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delayed Delivery

Did it actually get delivered, or did it just leave her Outbox, and is sitting 
in the server queue waiting for the delivery timer to expire?


From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delayed Delivery

I have a user who uses delayed delivery several times a week. She sent one 
today scheduled to be sent June 30, but it went immediately. I looked in her 
sent items, and the item is labeled "This item has been marked to be delivered 
after Monday, June 30, 2008 10:00 AM." Any ideas? Exchange 2007 and Outlook 
2007.

Scot Parsons
Systems Engineer
S.C. Educational Television
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
803-737-3251





**

Note:

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and

protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to

the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by

replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

**




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: stopping a spammer

[Scot Parsons]

Yeah. Vtext.com is Verizon texting.

From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stopping a spammer

The logs do look like texting or webmail entries from a phone.



From: Jake Gardner [mailto:jgard...@ttcdas.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stopping a spammer

I pulled the extra MX a couple months ago when the cuda came online to force 
all mail to go to it.  I had been planning on putting it back.  Currently the 
big wigs make direct connects to the exchange server with their Iphones and use 
smtp auth on 25.

Anyone see an iphone cause this?  Since I don't seem to be configured to relay, 
and the ip belongs to ATT.   I am working on seeing if any of the iphones here 
have that IP address.


Thanks,

Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stopping a spammer
You only have a single MX record anyway - and that goes to the barracuda.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

From: Jake Gardner [mailto:jgard...@ttcdas.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stopping a spammer

Then I lose my failover to the mail server (direct connect) in case the 'cuda 
goes offline.

Thanks,

Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246



From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stopping a spammer
First thing.  Block port 25 incoming and outgoing on the firewall to everything 
except the cuda.

From: Jake Gardner [mailto:jgard...@ttcdas.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 1:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: stopping a spammer

I'm at a loss here and need some help.

I have an exchange 2003 server that has been used as relay 2 days ago and this 
morning.   I have checked and tested that I am not open as a relay (or somehow 
I am!?)  I checked the SMTP logs and found entries for the spammer but I can't 
see how they were able to send the emails.

Log snipped:
2009-01-21 13:51:57 71.158.154.135 User EHLO - +User 250 0 334 9 0 -
2009-01-21 13:51:57 71.158.154.135 User MAIL - 
+FROM:<9893024...@ncacu.org> 250 0 45 32 0 -
2009-01-21 13:51:57 71.158.154.135 User RCPT - 
+TO:<9897834...@vtext.com> 250 0 33 30 0 -
2009-01-21 13:51:58 71.158.154.135 User RCPT - 
+TO:<9897834...@vtext.com> 250 0 33 30 0 -


Yesterday I had set the IP address to be blocked under Message 
Delivery-Connections options but they still got in.  I just now added the IP to 
SMTP's connection properties.  I've also emailed the IP owners (from ARIN) with 
the logs.

How might this be happening?  I have all of my mail normally come in via MX to 
my barracuda and my internal mail server sends mail out via my 'cuda.


Thanks,

Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246





***Teletronics Technology Corporation***
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.

Thank you.

***







***Teletronics Technology Corporation***
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.

Thank you.

***







This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members 
Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of 
the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this 
message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, 
dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly 
prohibited.




***Teletronics Technology Corporation***
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are n

OWA 2007 Timeout

[Scot Parsons]

Does anyone know the reg hack to change the OWA 2007 public/private login 
timeouts? Thanks.

Scot

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OWA 2007 Timeout

[Scot Parsons]

There is no MSExchangeWEB\OWA, but there is a MSExchangeOWA. I'll try it. 
Thanks.

From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 2007 Timeout


Scot,

Does the 2003 mod work in 2007 (I admit I haven't tried it on our 07 stuff )

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\OWA

Dword PublicClientTimeout
Dword TrustedClientTimeout

Both in minutes.

-Troy

From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 2007 Timeout


Does anyone know the reg hack to change the OWA 2007 public/private login 
timeouts? Thanks.

Scot









~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

[Scot Parsons]

The January Technet is supposed to include "Exchange Server 2007 Technical 
Documentation". I haven't received mine yet or had a chance to check the 
website.


From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?


Documentation similar to the E2K3 Deployment Guide, Administration Guide, 
Transport and Routing Guide, etc. - available for download.




From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?


Are you referring specifically to the "Exchange Server 2003 Technical Reference 
Guide" document, or the entire Exchange 2003 Library?

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?


As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any references 
available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library that was available 
for 2003.


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?


OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems 
Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy such 
a thing? What would you want to be in it?

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and 
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough details 
about? The more specific the better!

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com





**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**








**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Ridiculous customer requirement...

[Scot Parsons]

Give us his email address...please.

From: Rick Corgiat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ridiculous customer requirement...


All,
I have a customer that is requiring me to configure email in this ridiculous 
way:
All users can send email to internal and external recipients.
The "Reply To" address for most users must be [EMAIL PROTECTED] when sent to 
external recipients.
All incoming mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I configure Exchange/ADUC settings to make this happen? There is no 
reasoning with the customer, this has to happen.
TIA,
Rick






~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

[Scot Parsons]

And spotted dick isn't oddball?

From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all


ahhh right. Just checking. This list is great. All these odd ball foods y'all 
eat!


From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2008 16:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

Porridge is made from Oats not Corn. We call it Outmeal here in the states.
- Original Message -
From: Ellis, John P.
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all


you mean porridge?
Im glad you told me what Hominy is 


From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2008 16:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

It's ground up hominy, which you then boil to cook them.  Should never be 
runny, as has been mentioned already.  Hominy comes from corn by the way.

Joe Heaton



From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

Grits?

John, UK.


From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2008 16:35
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

I grew up in Northern Florida, and loved grape jelly on my grits... my father 
ate them with butter and pepper, which is how I eat them now.

Joe Heaton



From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

I'm going to take issue with your response to #16.  I'm originally from the 
mountains of North Carolina (fairly close to the Tennessee border) and I grew 
up eating grits with butter and sugar.

Andy

From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all



11.) A true Southerner knows that "fixin'" can be used as a noun, a verb, or an 
adverb.

I'm fixin' to forward this to some of my friends! Or "fiddenta", as we say 
around here.

13.) Only true Southerners make friends while standing in lines. We don't do 
"queues", we do "lines," and when we're "in line," we talk to everybody!

I was so confused when, as a child, I moved from the deep south to New York and 
heard people talking about waiting "on line." I kept looking at the floor 
trying to find the line they were standing on. Thankfully, a year later we left 
NY and headed south again!

15.) True Southerners never refer to one person as "y'all."

A pet peeve of mine. When Hollywood tries to imitate southerners, it has actors 
saying "y'all" to just one person. Drives me nuts.

16.) True Southerners know grits come from corn and how to eat them.

With salt, and sometimes cheese. Never with sugar.

19.) Only true Southerners say "sweet tea" and "sweet milk." Sweet tea 
indicates the need for sugar and lots of it - we do not like our tea 
unsweetened. "Sweet milk" means you don't want buttermilk.

Actually, in a good southern restaurant you don't have to say "sweet." If you 
order tea, it will be sweet-because why on earth would anyone want tea that 
WASN'T sweet?!

20.) And a true Southerner knows you don't scream obscenities at little old 
ladies who drive 30 MPH on the freeway. You just say, "Bless her heart" and go 
your own way.
In the south, you can utter all sorts of insults without being considered rude 
if you follow them up with a "bless his/her heart." For example, "That Jane 
just isn't very bright, bless her heart" or, "Joe's collards always taste like 
dirt, bless his heart."












**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they

are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify

the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by

MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com

**


















~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

[Scot Parsons]

He knows what donkey balls taste like?

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

Don says those taste like donkey balls...

Andy

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

 http://candy-crate.stores.yahoo.net/oldfaslicorh.html

Granted... it's an aquired taste.

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

I dunno what your talking about, but "horehound" made me interested.

On Feb 6, 2008 10:09 AM, Maglinger, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Not just red-eye gravy, but what about milk gravy?   MM Mmmm!
> And only a TRUE southerner would know about pokeweed, horehound candy,
> sorghum, and breeches...
>
> 
>
>
> From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:20 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: OT: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Southernisms:
>
>
>
>
> 1.) Only a true Southerner knows the difference between a hissie fit
and a
> conniption, and that you don't "HAVE" them, -- you "PITCH" them.
>
>
> 2.) Only a true Southerner knows how many fish, collard greens, turnip
> greens, peas, beans, etc. make up "a mess."
>
>
> 3.) Only a true Southerner can show or point out to you the general
> direction of "yonder."
>
>
> 4.) Only a true Southerner knows exactly how long "directly" is - as
in:
> "Going to town, be back directly."
>
>
> 5.) All true Southerners, even babies, know that "Gimme some sugar" is
not a
> request for the white, granular sweet substance that sits in a pretty
little
> bowl on the middle of the table.
>
>
> 6.) All true Southerners know exactly when "by and by" is. They might
not
> use the term, but they know the concept well.
>
>
> 7.) Only a true Southerner knows instinctively that the best gesture
of
> solace for a neighbor who's got trouble is a plate of hot fried
chicken and
> a big bowl of cold potato salad. (If the neighbor's trouble is a real
> crisis, they also know to add a large banana puddin'!)
>
>
> 8.) Only true Southerners grow up knowing the difference between
"right
> near" and "a right far piece." They also know that "just down the
road" can
> be 1 mile or 20.
>
>
> 9.) Only a true Southerner both knows and understands the difference
between
> a redneck, a good ol' boy, and po' white trash.
>
>
> 10.) No true Southerner would ever assume that the car with the
flashing
> turn signal is actually going to make a turn.
>
>
> 11.) A true Southerner knows that "fixin'" can be used as a noun, a
verb, or
> an adverb.
>
>
> 12.) Only a true Southerner knows that the term "booger" can be a
resident
> of the nose, a descriptive, as in "that ol' booger," a first name or
> something that jumps out at you in the dark and scares you senseless.
>
>
> 13.) Only true Southerners make friends while standing in lines. We
don't do
> "queues", we do "lines," and when we're "in line," we talk to
everybody!
>
> 14.) Put 100 true Southerners in a room and half of them will discover
> they're related, even if only by marriage.
>
>
> 15.) True Southerners never refer to one person as "y'all."
>
>
> 16.) True Southerners know grits come from corn and how to eat them.
>
>
> 17.) Every true Southerner knows tomatoes with eggs, bacon, grits, and
> coffee are perfectly wonderful; that redeye gravy is also a breakfast
food;
> and that fried green tomatoes are not a breakfast food.
>
>
> 18.) When you hear someone say, "Well, I caught myself lookin' .. ,"
you
> know you are in the presence of a genuine Southerner!
>
>
> 19.) Only true Southerners say "sweet tea" and "sweet milk." Sweet tea
> indicates the need for sugar and lots of it - we do not like our tea
> unsweetened. "Sweet milk" means you don't want buttermilk.
>
>
> 20.) And a true Southerner knows you don't scream obscenities at
little old
> ladies who drive 30 MPH on the freeway. You just say, "Bless her
heart" and
> go your own way.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



--
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate

[Scot Parsons]

The mailbox move utility would only allow 10-12 instances at a time, so I used 
the built-in scheduler to kick them off every couple of hours. With 300 
boxes/200GB, it took Thursday night(11pm-7am), Friday night, and most of the 
weekend to move them. The old box was kind of a dog though.

From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate

To add to Scot,

What exchange services are you running?  I constantly lecture about having 
exchange off the DC and putting money into mail, but some folks use exchange 
MAPI in office only for small businesses and it totally works fine.  If you 
have intentions of running OWA, OA, EAS.you probably need to separate 
Exchange and depending on the number of clients really think about a separate 
Client Access box.

As for labor time, once again it depends on how many users and how many 
services you decide to run.  If you have done this before and are familiar with 
the whole process you could do it in a couple hours in the simplest case.  I 
know that my dev environment install took 3 times longer than my production as 
I ran into little unexpected pieces... things like needing to have a 32 bit 
copy of Exchange 2007 to apply the schema extensions to my 32bit schema master 
(which is in a separate domain).

Good luck, sorry I couldn't be more specific on the timeframe.

-troy

From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate

How many and how big are the mailboxes?

I would take this opportunity to separate Exchange from DC, but that's just me.

From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate


I have a Windows 2000 / Exchange 2000 network that is scheduled for an upgrade 
to Windows 2003 / Exchange 2007.



Server1: Windows 2000 Domain Controller, file/print

Server2: Windows Domain Controller, Exchange 2000



Upgrade to >



Server1: Windows 2003 Domain Controller, File/print (new box)

Server2: Windows 2003 Domain Controller, Exchange 2007. (new box)



Understanding that my question is probably as uncertain as any answer I'll 
receive, but I would like to ask if anyone can give me a rough estimate of 
labor hours involved to perform the upgrade.



P.S. Sarcasm is more than welcomed.


Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-Messaging, MCP
Network Blade Inc.
49 Marcy Street
Somerset, NJ 08873
732-213-0600










~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate

[Scot Parsons]

How many and how big are the mailboxes?

I would take this opportunity to separate Exchange from DC, but that's just me.

From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate


I have a Windows 2000 / Exchange 2000 network that is scheduled for an upgrade 
to Windows 2003 / Exchange 2007.



Server1: Windows 2000 Domain Controller, file/print

Server2: Windows Domain Controller, Exchange 2000



Upgrade to >



Server1: Windows 2003 Domain Controller, File/print (new box)

Server2: Windows 2003 Domain Controller, Exchange 2007. (new box)



Understanding that my question is probably as uncertain as any answer I'll 
receive, but I would like to ask if anyone can give me a rough estimate of 
labor hours involved to perform the upgrade.



P.S. Sarcasm is more than welcomed.


Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-Messaging, MCP
Network Blade Inc.
49 Marcy Street
Somerset, NJ 08873
732-213-0600




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Leap Year

[Scot Parsons]

I was trying to add a new user in Exchange 2007 SP1, and got the following 
error:

Error:
The Exchange server address list service failed to respond. This could be 
because of an address list or email address policy configuration error.

I googled around and ran across a couple of posts that theorized it is a leap 
year problem. Has anyone else seen this?

Scot


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 and Virtual Server

[Scot Parsons]

I've been running Exchange 2007 on VMWare with databases and logs on our SAN. 
I've been live for two months, and so far, everything is running great.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and Virtual Server

Lots of people are putting Exchange 2007 on VMWare. ESX is VMWare ESX
Server.
http://www.vmware.com/landing_pages/exchange_solution.html

16,000 Mailboxes on one server with VMWare
http://blogs.vmware.com/vmtn/2008/03/16000-exchange.html



-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and Virtual Server

Thanks for the info. I was looking at a mostly high side Dell Optiplex tower
or a precision workstation as the basis. By the time I get home I should
have a full TechNet DVD set waiting for me. Letting it blow up and rebuild
on a regular basis will give me some experience in virtual disaster recovery
as well.

I am very much of the old school training, one server one
application/service. Virtual machines are a whole new area for me to wrap my
head around.

Anyone know of a good list I can subscribe to that's centered around MS
virtual server?

Please define ESX for me?

Thanks.


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium - 717.633.3823
Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832

"A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in
America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you to
trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and
Stripes."  Woodrow Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and Virtual Server

I run about a 8-12 vm ESX server with a win2k3r2 dc and exchange 2007 on a
win2k3r2 64 bit server. My dc has 512meg ram and my exchange server has
~1.5gb.
This is all off a core 2 duo 1.8 GHz (slow) and I think 6gig ram. There are
a few other vm's running windows, CentOS and FreeBSD on it...

It runs reliably.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2003 versions?

[Scot Parsons]

I thought 2003 versions were 6.5.x.x. KB158530. I guess there's more than one 
set of version numbers.


From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 versions?


Hi,

Two Exchange 2003 servers display this when I telnet to each of them:

Version: 6.0.3790.3959

Version: 6.0.3790.1830

Does the difference in version # tell me anything?  Is one of them missing a 
particular patch(es)?

Thx




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange Issue

[Scot Parsons]

Does this sound like what you're getting? 

http://www.exchangeinbox.com/article.aspx?i=114

Outlook 2007 profile problem

[Scot Parsons]

We have a problem with disappearing Outlook 2007 profiles. When a user logs out 
and back in and starts Outlook, it runs through the Outlook setup wizard again. 
It doesn't happen to all of them. Anyone seen this?

Scot Parsons
Systems Engineer
S.C. Educational Television
spars...@scetv.org
803-737-3251

RE: [ot] Friday Funny

[Scot Parsons]

Why did the pervert cross the road?

He was following the chicken.

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny

Two muffins are cooking in a oven.  The first muffin turns to the other and 
says, "Man, it sure is hot in here."

The second muffin says, "Ahhh  A talking muffin!!!"

Shook

From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: [ot] Friday Funny

Whats brown and sticky

a stick

On 30 April 2010 14:43, Maglinger, Paul 
mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com>> wrote:
How many Freemasons does it take to change a light bulb?

It's a secret!

From: Reische Jay 
[mailto:reische...@johndeere.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny


2 Goldfish are in a tank, one says to the other, "You man the guns - I'll 
drive"...



Jay Reische
Enterprise Exchange Administrator
Messaging, AD and DNS

Phone: 309-748-9422
reische...@johndeere.com


From: Kim Longenbaugh 
[mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny

What do you get if you divide the circumference
of a pumpkin by its diameter?

Pumpkin pi.

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: [ot] Friday Funny

What do you call a fly without wings?

A 'walk'.



Shook




--
Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!

RE: [ot] Friday Funny

[Scot Parsons]

I was trying to make it cleaner for the list.

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny

No, no, you have it all wrong.  He wasn't following the chicken, he was stuck 
to it.

From: Scot Parsons [mailto:spars...@scetv.org]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny

Why did the pervert cross the road?

He was following the chicken.

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny

Two muffins are cooking in a oven.  The first muffin turns to the other and 
says, "Man, it sure is hot in here."

The second muffin says, "Ahhh  A talking muffin!!!"

Shook

From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: [ot] Friday Funny

Whats brown and sticky

a stick

On 30 April 2010 14:43, Maglinger, Paul 
mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com>> wrote:
How many Freemasons does it take to change a light bulb?

It's a secret!

From: Reische Jay 
[mailto:reische...@johndeere.com<mailto:reische...@johndeere.com>]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny


2 Goldfish are in a tank, one says to the other, "You man the guns - I'll 
drive"...



Jay Reische
Enterprise Exchange Administrator
Messaging, AD and DNS

Phone: 309-748-9422
reische...@johndeere.com<mailto:reische...@johndeere.com>


From: Kim Longenbaugh 
[mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com<mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com>]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny

What do you get if you divide the circumference
of a pumpkin by its diameter?

Pumpkin pi.

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com<mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com>]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: [ot] Friday Funny

What do you call a fly without wings?

A 'walk'.



Shook




--
Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!

RE: [ot] Friday Funny

[Scot Parsons]

How did Helen Keller burn her face? 

Bobbing for fries. 

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [ot] Friday Funny

What do you call a quadriplegic in a pool?
Bob

What do you call a Quadriplegic in a hot tub?
Stew

What do you call a Quadriplegic at your front door?
Matt



John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: [ot] Friday Funny

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Andy Shook  wrote:
> What do you call a fly without wings?
> A 'walk'.

  Q: What do you call a deer with no eyes?
  A: No eye-deer.  [say it out loud]

  Q: What do you call a deer with no eyes and no legs?
  A: Still no eye-deer.

-- Ben



CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

RE: OWA

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: OWA



Oh, 
come on. Don't beat around the bush. Do you think it's a little 
pricey?
 
 
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:12 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
OWA

Holy crap that is 
expensive.
 
-Original 
Message-From: Precht, 
David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:41 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
OWA
 
http://www.spellchecker.com/corporate/ 
 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including 
any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.
 
-Original Message- From: GCA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 
17:02 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA 
 
Hello All, 
I have a couple of questions about OWA.  

1) When will spell check be available? 
   
2) Is there a way 
to create a rule on the server side to block certain people from sending mail to my users.  
ie.  spam and other mail to be blocked. 
3) How does one create a signature in owa? 

4) In present our present use of Outlook, if you type 
the name of the person you are sending email to, their email address 
pops up in the To box.  Possible in web version? 
TIA, any information is greatly 
appreciated. 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: 16 GB Limit?



A big
bowl of ice cream and a Sam Adams.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:33
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB
Limit?
Chocolate covered Krispy Kreme donuts. 
MM   Starbucks Sumatra blend coffee. 
MMM 
-Original Message- From:
Clark,
Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
Limit? 
Chocolate covered donuts. 
Steve Clark Clark Systems Support,
LLC
AVIEN Charter Member "Who's
watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com
 
301-610-9584 voice   240-465-0323
Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is
deemed by
Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged
information
and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message- From:
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:21 AM To:
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB
Limit? 
 
Okay, this discussion is really making me hungry for junk
food
and/or good hot jalapeno bagels with a cup of caffeine thrown in for good
measure...Ohhh please make it stop, lunch isn't for another 1 & 45
minutes..I hear the snack machine calling my name.
-Original Message- From:
Clark,
Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
Limit? 
 
Coke and a lemon pie... hu 
  
Steve Clark Clark Systems Support,
LLC
AVIEN Charter Member "Who's
watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com
 
301-610-9584 voice   240-465-0323
Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is
deemed by
Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged
information
and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message- From:
Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
Limit? 
  
Ewww 
  
Bagels are nasty. 
  
-Original Message- From:
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
Limit? 
  
But bagels are somewhat good for you.well, the ones I
like
aren't that healthy, jalapeño bagel w/jalapeño crème cheese
-Original Message- From:
William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
Limit? 
 www.acronymfinder.com  > 
www.netlingo.com  > 
W 
Throw away the Krappy Kremes and have a bagel
instead. 

  
 -Original Message- From:
Majetic, John RAME [mailto:jmajetic@radiometerame
rica.com
 

> ] Sent: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 21:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 
  
Ok take back my cookie from Friday, but what does LOL
mean?
Sorry to be such 
an inDUHvidual, but I have to know.   John Majetic 
-Original Message- From:
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   > ]

Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
Limit? 
  
LOL. 
-Original Message- From:
Ropiak
Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

> ]

Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 6:54 AM To:
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?

  
We could hold Weight Watcher meetings there after hours,
too.
   
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve
Ropiak  ZF Group NAO CERT,
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax (513)
314-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-Original Message- From:
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   > ]

Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
Limit? 
  
We think a great franchise combo that would make lots of
$$$
would be a StarBucks/Krispy Kreme Donuts

-Original Message- From:
Precht,
David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> ] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:15 PM To:
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?

  
You had to mention that... I could 

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Krispy
Kreme sells Krullers.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Steve Ens
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:37
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB
Limit?
Hard
to describeI've had them in the States before...maybe I can find a
picture
for you.  Crullers is the technical term.  Melt in your
mouth...

  
  -Original Message-From:
Abercrombie,
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01,
2002
  10:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
16 GB
  Limit?
  Ok, what are crulllers? 
  -Original Message- From:
Steve
  Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:26 AM To:
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB
  Limit? 
  Robin's coffee...and crulllers. 
  -Original Message- From:
  Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:24 AM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:
  RE: 16 GB Limit? 
  Chocolate covered donuts. 
  Steve Clark Clark Systems
Support, LLC
  AVIEN Charter Member "Who's
  watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com
   
  301-610-9584 voice  
240-465-0323
  Efax 
  The data furnished in connection with this document is
deemed
  by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged
  information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others
  without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support,
LLC.
  -Original Message- From:
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:21 AM To:
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB
  Limit? 
  
  Okay, this discussion is really making me hungry for
junk food
  and/or good hot jalapeno bagels with a cup of caffeine thrown in for
good
  measure...Ohhh please make it stop, lunch isn't for another 1 &
45
  minutes..I hear the snack machine calling my name.
  -Original Message- From:
  Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
  Limit? 
  
  Coke and a lemon pie... hu

    
  Steve Clark Clark Systems
Support, LLC
  AVIEN Charter Member "Who's
  watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com
   
  301-610-9584 voice  
240-465-0323
  Efax 
  The data furnished in connection with this document is
deemed
  by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged
  information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others
  without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support,
LLC.
  -Original Message- From:
  Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:33 AM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 
    
  Ewww 
    
  Bagels are nasty. 
    
  -Original Message- From:
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
  Limit? 
    
  But bagels are somewhat good for you.well, the ones
I like
  aren't that healthy, jalapeño bagel w/jalapeño crème
cheese
  -Original Message- From:
  William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  ] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:47 AM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 
   www.acronymfinder.com  > 
  www.netlingo.com 
  > 
  W 
  Throw away the Krappy Kremes and have a bagel
instead. 
  
    
   -Original Message- From:
  Majetic, John RAME [mailto:jmajetic@radiometerame
rica.com
   
  
  > ] Sent: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 21:13
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 
    
  Ok take back my cookie from Friday, but what does LOL
mean?
  Sorry to be such 
  an inDUHvidual, but I have to know.   John Majetic 
  -Original Message- From:
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   > ]
  
  Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
  Limit? 
    
  LOL. 
  -Original Message- From:
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  
> ]
  
  Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
16 GB
  Limit? 
    
  We could hold Weight Watcher meetings there after hours,
too.
     
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve
  Ropiak  ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207)
989-9115
  voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513)
  314-0197 cell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  -Original

RE: Attachment sending problem

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: 16 GB Limit?



It 
looks like there is a size limit on their side.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Anwar Qureshi 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:04 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attachment sending 
problem
I am 
trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any 
problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have 
removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do 
so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they 
said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am 
getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble 
shoot this problem
 
Anwar





Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap.
Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'dbias@xx.com' on 5/1/2002 11:52 
AM
The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take 
delivery
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= 
;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020501155056Z-341
MSEXCH:IMS:ims:mail:IMSMAIL 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size 
limitList Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: It's Friday!!

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



The 
dingos got my baby.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:27 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
Friday!!

I don't get 
it
 
-Original 
Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
Friday!!
 

I have a 
baby

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: It's 
  Friday!!
  Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have lots 
  of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a few crullers), Kona Special Blend 
  coffee, and I have Monday off.  Three day weekend, yippee!  
  
  It's going to be a GOOD 
  day!! 
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie Data 
  Center Administration Team Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Bogus Attachments

[Scot Parsons]

It's the Klez virus.


-Original Message-
From: Rod Wilson Sr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Bogus Attachments


Hi All,
I am running a 5.5 server with Antigen.  I have had a multitude of
attachments lately that are coming from outside my organization.  The
funny thing is, the emails FROM feild has an employees address and it is
being sent to another employees address.  But the Sender never sent it.
It seems as though the From address is spoofed.  Is anyone else getting
this?  How can someone get a list of address off my Exchange box?  Or is
it a random shot in the dark thing?
Thanks
Rod

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Print message without mailbox name

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



I 
would do what the FBI does. Mark it out with a black marker.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:15 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print message 
without mailbox name
Shoot, 
Cut it Off, Throw it on the Copier BAM  You're back to 8.5X11 and Nobody's 
the Wiser.

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print message 
  without mailbox name
  Cutting it would make it invalid, wouldn't it? If such a piece of 
  evidence was presented in a trial against me, I'd hope my lawyer would scream 
  about "mutilated evidence", and how no one could be sure exactly what was cut 
  off. That's why medical records have to be pristine - you can't annotate them 
  later, you have to use the original, unalterated source.
   
  --
  
  Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
  Philadelphia Contributionship
  210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA  
  19106
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  V: 215-627-1752 x1282
  F: 215-627-5354
  
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print 
message without mailbox name
The attorney actually suggested the 
scissors option. :-)  Not that you think like a lawyer...or 
that it would be a bad thing if you did.

  -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
  12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Print message without mailbox name
  A pair of scissors to cut it off ... or are sharp 
  implements not allowed?
   
  Or create a mailbox and profile with a "neutral" 
  name e.g MS Exchange 5.5/2000 or something similar and print from 
  there.
   
  Karen
  
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 10 May 2002 
17:02To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Print message without mailbox name
The email may be presented as 
evidence in court and should not have someone's name at the top who 
is not connected to the message.

  -Original Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 
  2002 11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Print message without mailbox 
  name
  Do they have an issue with the preson printing it out 
  ?
   -Original 
  Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 
  2002 10:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Print message without mailbox name
  
One of our Attorneys has come to 
me with a problem.  He needs to print email that he has on a cd 
from a client.  When the message is opened and printed it puts 
Mailbox Name at the top of printed message.  I've searched 
Slipstick and MS and the only option I can find is to save the .msg 
as an .rtf, open in Word and then print.
 
Anyone know of an easier 
way?
 
Thanks
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This 
electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected 
by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any actio

Dumb question

[Scot Parsons]

I should probably 
know the answer to this, so be gentle.
 
Does Exch. 5.5 
Enterprise edition require NT Server Enterprise edition?
 
Thanks
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Dumb question

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



thanks
 
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:34 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Dumb 
question
no

  
  -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:32 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Dumb 
  question
  I should probably 
  know the answer to this, so be gentle.
   
  Does Exch. 5.5 
  Enterprise edition require NT Server Enterprise edition?
   
  ThanksList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

5.5 upgrade

[Scot Parsons]

Currently running 
5.5 standard, academic edition. Does anyone know of a vendor that still sells 
5.5? Need 5.5 enterprise upgrade, (?academic?).
 
Are the client 
access licenses different for standard and enterprise if I stay at 
5.5?
 
Thanks.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange GAL

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



Is 
that like COBOL?
 
 
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 
1:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
GAL
Is that like 
Cobal?

  
  -Original Message-From: Andy David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:00 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  GAL
  Cobalt.
   
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 
2002 12:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange GAL
Can I see that Kevin? What is it written in 
-Original Message- From: 
John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:49 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange GAL 
Are you serious Kevin? 
John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 
239 - 2981 
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until 
defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat 
in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment 
is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a 
path leading to success and truth. --Bruce 
Lee 
-Original Message- From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Exchange GAL 
I've written a simple utility that will import SMTP entries 
into the Contacts. It does an export of the GAL, 
rejigs it a bit and then does an import. Is this of 
any use? 
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: 
Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 20 May 2002 14:00 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 
GAL 
Is there anyway to export the GAL to a remote user that is 
using outlook 2000 Internet E-mail Only service? 
They are setup with an alias on the exchange server 
to bounce their mail to their ISP mailservers. So they are not attached to the exchange server to use any of the resources that 
are setup on it. Any help would be 
appreciated 
Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  --The 
  information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
  information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it 
  is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
  are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
  message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, 
  please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, 
  fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the 
  message. Thank 
  you.==List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook Licensing Question

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Outlook Licensing Question



2000
 
 
-Original Message-From: Steve Hart 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:42 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
Licensing Question
 

  -Original Message-From: Steve Hart 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:39 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Licensing 
  Question
  We're running Exchange 5.5, all properly licensed. 
  What is the latest version of Outlook we can run on a 5.5 CAL, 
  without an Office license on the workstation? 
  (My MS rep is out of town and his sub is clueless) 
  Steve  
   
  Ooops. 
  Next time I read my list mail before I muick around on Microsoft's 
  web site.
  Steve 
  Exch 5.5 
  CALs are not valid for use of Outlook 2002/XP.  
  See
  http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2002.htm
  under 
  "Availability" where it talks about Exchange 5.5.
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: 16 GB Limit?



If 
anyone finds a source for 5.5 Enterprise, please let the list 
know.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
Limit?
He he.  I'm actually going to enjoy this meeting.I'm 
going to enjoy saying "I been telling you this was going to happen, na na na na 
na".  Okay, I probably won't say it exactly like that, but I will enjoy 
it!
My off-line defrag this past weekend gained me nada, zippo, 
zilch, zero.  The stripe set it's on is a total of 25 GB, the IS is @ 12.6 
& growing, if I can get drives for this server is a big IF, so far I've 
found none (Compaq 1850R), Exchange Enterprise 5.5 is unavailable that I've 
found for purchase.  Looks like I get a new/second Exchange server out of 
this deal.  Mgmt is real big on my being able to run off-line defrag 
regularly and/or isinteg if there is database corruption, I'm at the point that 
I can't do that easily or quickly, & of course that's the other part of what 
they want, it must be quick.   Sooo, I've configured a nice little 
Compaq ML530 with dual processors, 2 GB ram & 6 18 GB drives.I'm going 
to enjoy playing with my new server :) 
-Original Message- From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB 
Limit? 
Yes.  Absolutely. 
>From Paul Robichaux's Managing Exchange Server 5.5: 

"If you're running the Standard Edition of Exchange, and your 
public or private IS is very close to the 16GB limit, the IS will shut down 
instead of growing beyond that limit. If this happens, do an off-line 
defragmentation of the database (see Chapter 17 for details) to reclaim the 
database whitespace, then restart the IS. If the database is already compacted, 
then you may have to consider upgrading to Enterprise Edition to get the store 
to start."
-Original Message- From: Sherry 
Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB 
Limit? 
Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I 
understand before a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the 
priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a 
screeching halt?  Yes or no?
Thanks, Sherry 
I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan. > > There is a hardcoded 16GB database 
limit to each of the private > information store and 
public information store in the Exchange > Standard 
version. > > 
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: 
RE: 16 GB Limit? > > 
> MSExchangeIS Private?  Storage Limits? 
> > Dan Munley > > > 
> -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: 
RE: 16 GB Limit? > > 
> GB, not MB. > 
> There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the 
priv.edb and pub.edb. > > 
The online maintenance that runs each night will report the database 
> information to the application event log. > > William > 
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: 
RE: 16 GB Limit? > > 
> It is agreed that the limit is 16MB.  How is 
that determined?  Through 
> the aggregate size of the mailboxes and private folders? Or 
the size > of the Priv and Pub? > > Dan Munley > 
> > > -Original Message- > From: 
Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:56 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: 
16 GB Limit? > > 
> Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on 
regular 5.5, but > all the docs I can find from 
Microsoft don't seem to differencate > between 5.5 
and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that 
> regualar 5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of 
it. > > Am I right? 
> If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5? > > > John 
Majetic > > List Charter 
and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > List Charter and FAQ 
at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > > 
> List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > List Charter and FAQ 
at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Backup

[Scot Parsons]

Same server name. Same organization. Different site.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup


If installing a backup exchange server, should I place in same site or
create a different site? (exch 5.5)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

5.5 Standard to Enterprise

[Scot Parsons]

Are the client 
licenses for 5.5 Standard the same for 5.5 Enterprise? In other words, if I 
upgrade to Enterprise do I need to buy new CALs if I'm not moving to Exchange 
2000?
 
Also, does anyone 
have any tips for this upgrade? It seems pretty 
straightforward.
 
Scot
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public folder security

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



You 
think?
 
 
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:37 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Public folder 
security
You 
might want to give them permission to read items.

  
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:57 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Public folder 
  security
  I am playing around a little with security for a 
  few of my public folders.  
  If I set the permissions for a public folder so 
  like this: 
  John Q User 
      Custom 
  Permission 
  Level:   Custom x Create Items  _ Folder Owner _ Read Items    
      _ Folder Contact _ Create Subfolders x Folder 
  Visible 
  Edit 
  own    Delete None 
  This will make it so that the user can add items 
  to the folder with no problems.  However if the user make said folder the 
  current folder it will tell them that they do not have permissions to that 
  folder.
  Is there any way that I can make the folder so 
  that the user can place items in it but not be able to copy them from that 
  folder into another?
  I know this sounds strange but I have a manager 
  that is being VERY paranoid right now.  I am about to tell him that I can 
  not do it.
  Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 14205 Burnet Road, Suite 600, Austin, TX  
  78728 Phone: (512) 
  255- Fax: (512) 255-8780 
  http://www.waid.com 
  
  Failure to prepare is preparing to fail. 
    ~ John Wooden, 
  UCLA basketball coach List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: For Kevin Miller

[Scot Parsons]

Title: Message



He's 
probably on steroids just like Sosa.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:29 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: For Kevin 
Miller
Gee, 
you think maybe the owner is the idiot, not A-Rod?
 
FYI - 
A-Rod is leading the ML in RBI, 2nd in Total Bases, tied with Bonds and Sosa in 
HR, batting .317, .661 Slugging Percentage, etc.  Not doing too bad.  


  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 
  12:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: For 
  Kevin Miller
  85 
  Million???  What about the 250 Million that A-Fraud is getting for his 10 
  year contract?
  

-Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 
2002 3:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
For Kevin Miller

Football 
sucks Over paid idiots who couldn't find their way out of a wet 
paper bag. 
 
Baseball is 
alright, but becoming way too commercial. More over priced 
idiots. Why someone gets paid $ 85 million for 10 years is beyond 
me.
 
Now Hockeythere 
is a sport. It's still about the game, not the money. And it's more of a 
diverse sport. The only down side to hockey is The 
Wngs
 List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Upgrading from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise

[Scot Parsons]

I'm about to upgrade 
from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise. Any 
advice/tricks?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

[Scot Parsons]

And Beer!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Restricting Users from sending mail


M...cheese biscuits. Better yet, why not pickles and cheese??
www.picklesandcheese.com
- Original Message -
From: "Preston Jeffares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:54 PM
Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail


Thanks William... thats what I get for eating too many cheese biscuits for
lunch and being lazy...

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail


The answer can be found here:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricting Users from sending mail


Hrm... maybe I'm just missing it today... but isn't there a specific
option to prevent select users from actually sending mail.  The users
need to be able to recieve mail... but not send any.  I suppose I could
implement a Send Message Size limit of zero... but wanted to know if
there was a better way to do it.

Exchange 2000 sp2

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5

[Scot Parsons]

Title: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5



I just 
blame everything on the users.
 
 
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:15 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Note on moving 
Exch 5.5
I always blame it on the DBA'sof course they are always 
trying to blame it on my servers, but it's never my server :)
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center 
Administration Team Information Technology 
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 

-Original Message- From: David 
N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
Don't quit the day job 
-Original Message- From: Ely, 
Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
I "Blame it on the Rain, yeah, yeah" 
-Original Message- From: 
Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
I always blame the network. 
-Original Message- From: Andy 
David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
Well, its always a "workstation" thing isnt it? If the workstation is trying to resolve a netbios name to an ip address 
it will use netbios over TCP/IP first whether its a NT 4 or W2k machine. The 
method it does that is determined by its node type. 
If the workstation/application is trying to resolve a host name 
to an ip address, it will use hosts and DNS first (i.e. Outlook connecting to 
the Exchange Server)) whether its a NT4 or W2k machine.
-Original Message- From: Brian 
Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
But are the workstations NT?  I believe a 2000 workstation 
hits DNS first then WINS.  It's not a network thing it's a workstation 
thing.  I believe you can also alter the order by making a few reg 
edits.
-Original Message- From: Andy 
David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
NT networks typically will use NetBIOS over TCP/IP for name 
resolution, i.e. WINS before DNS. That article refers to host name resolution 
(Hosts, DNS etc... before WINS) which *Outlook* as well as other applications 
will use to resolve.
-Original Message- From: Don 
Guyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
Matthew,     Windows NT networks will try 
querying an DNS server before trying WINS, by default. See MS article Q172218, 
for further explanation. Don Guyer
Information Systems Citadel Federal 
Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 
www.citadelfcu.org 
-Original Message- From: Andy 
David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
Outlook name resolution. 
-Original Message- From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Note on 
moving Exch 5.5 
Can anyone elaborate on how that works on an NT 4 domain? WINS 
is correct and a conflicting DNS entry is there? Why 
does DNS take precedence on an NT4 
domain? I thought that was a 2K thing??? (I am sending this to 
the NT list so stop barking) 
- Original Message - From: 
"Matthew Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 
"MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 
Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the old 
IP address. I originally intended to make it separate 
and make it mail2 or something 
similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most of 
my problems. - Original Message - 
From: "Matthew Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5 
As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past 
weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: 
I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the 
old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely 
different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I 
would not have to mess with router settings and such for the 
NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, 
mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started 
Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some 
users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A 
well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS

RE: garbled Japanese character sets

[Scot Parsons]

Fi dolla.

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: garbled Japanese character sets

笑は面白いよ！

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Posted At: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:00 AM
Posted To: ExchList
Conversation: garbled Japanese character sets
Subject: RE: garbled Japanese character sets

笑


From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: garbled Japanese character sets

古代日本の諺にもある。
Websterさんの口からは、日本の海よりも広い
とMBSは夏の途中でヤクようなにおいがする。

Shook

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: garbled Japanese character sets

お二人はすごいじゃあないですか？　本当に日本語できますか？
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Webster 
mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
しかし、Shookie赤ちゃんはまだ古代のOutlook 2003を使用しているので、彼は我々が送信されているすべてのこの日本のものを参照することはありません。


Webster

From: Pete Howard [mailto:pchow...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: garbled Japanese character sets

非常に良いウェブスター.  あなたは必ずその日本人です



From: Webster mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com>>

Subject: RE: garbled Japanese character sets
我々は皆、あなたを無視している。


Webster

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Subject: FW: garbled Japanese character sets

Bueller?  Bueller?  Fry? Fry?

Shook

From: Andy Shook
Subject: garbled Japanese character sets

Exchange 2003 with Outlook 2003 & 2010

Got an issue with an international company whereby (I love that word) Japanese 
characters are getting mangled between Outlook 2003 and 2010 clients.  I have 
read about this being an issue with Exchange 2007 but it was corrected within 
SP1.  Is this a known issue with Exchange 2003 and the best fix is to 
upgrade\migrate to Exchange 2010?  This is my first experience with the 
Japanese character set, so any help is appreciated.

May the Swartz be with you….

Shook

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
--

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

OWA white screen

[Scot Parsons]

I have one user who gets a white screen when she tries to log in to OWA 2007. 
The other 140 are behaving normally. Client is Windows 7 and IE 8.

Don't spend any time on this. I just wondered if anyone has seen this before.

Thanks,

Scot



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
or send an email to 
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist