Re: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
Ahhh boy!!! Here comes da flame! *lol - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 7:06 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF Do you have a question? -Original Message- From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 7:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF You know, some of you are a bunch of f**king hang-lows. So sorry not to be born the apparent microsoft technical expert that you apparently were, but some of us are still learning. You know, the up curve? You do understand that a domain is a grouping of network resources and not your backyard run that you need to piss along the borders of right? I'm afraid to ask a damn question for fear I'll get flamed like half these people do. So I guess I'll spend four times as long hunting and researching the answers I came to find quickly, by joining this list in the first place. A**holes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die LEAVE IT THE HELL ALONE THEN! Has your server performance degraded? Or are you just worried that your server is using the memory that you put in it? And another note, go read the damn FAQ's! If you had read them before posting, chances are you wouldn't have posted because your question would have already been answered. Here is the link just so you don't have to ask for it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Ben Winzenz Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: STORE.EXE make my server die I have the same problem and I don`t know what the hell is doing that STORE.exe which is getting around 300 MB of my memory , yes , its eating memory not CPU like your system Somebody Helppp - Original Message - From: Charles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Issues Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:55 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 SP3 I have an Exchange 2000 server w/SP2. This morning I installed SP3 and restarted. The STORE.EXE is now taking 99% of the CPU. I tried restarting all Exchange services but still have the same result. I also looked for the BkExpandDontRun enabled in the following registry key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ExCDO\Parameters It is not there. I did not have this with SP2. Any idea what's causing this? PLEASE HELP.. Thank you, Charles J. Laut List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?
SBC changed their policies on offering DSL to clients in 2000. They were offering up to 17,000 feet, now it's been reduced to 12,000...and some areas will never be eligible for DSL, because they have also stopped offering to remote clients as they canceled their remote setup program...they were constructing remote boxes outside of the perimeter of the nearest CO. - Original Message - From: David N. Precht [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:36 AM Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? You know what I meant ;) -Original Message- From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? Spooty? Make sure you wash your hands afterwards... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? DSL is spooty in Ventura county, CA?? You wouldn't think so -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 19:45 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? That is why my suggestion to him was www.skypipeline.com http://www.skypipeline.com . Not satellite, but earth-based direct microwave, with min speeds of 256 K Both Ways - symmetrical Fractional T-1 connectivity, with business and home accounts - with different policies and Usage Uptime commitments. Home accounts are cheaper with best effort - similar to Cable or home dsl, and business accounts priced more, with better support and uptime commitments. You pay for what you want. Speeds are available the same with both styles of accounts, but responsiveness to problems aren't. Also, this is really of benefit when you are outside of DSL range, cause it is a little more costly. Where he is in Ventura county, CA (same as me) dsl is spotty. Dennis -Original Message- From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? What about the upload speed. If you are running an exchange server on the site, and you are sending the data out over satellite, you are going to have a 60KB upload rate or something like that aren't you? That is what stopped us from setting up an exchange server on a remote site. Michael -Original Message- From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 13, 2002 2:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? 70ms latency is excellent. In fact it's so good, I don't belive there's any way satellite can provide this kind of latency. I've used several satellite rigs, and none come in under 500ms latency. Either their smoking crack, or 70 ms is some BS their makreting department came up with that refers to internal latencies on their wired network, and doesn't represent what customer's see over their true satellite links. You can't pump data into near earch orbit, and back that fast; the distances are far enough that the speed of an electron becomes an issue. That being said, most web protocols SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc. were initial designed for slow dial up networks with high latency. And will run fine over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite network. Issues would arise with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP or SNA. If your users want to just browse the web, and POP mail they should be fine. -Original Message- From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? Thanks. Yes, we were talking about high speed connection. The issue of latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels... One such measurement, 70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com http://www.skypipeline.com/ . If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line speed what will it mean to have 70ms using interactive applications specifically remote access software? ...guaranteed to have an average round trip packet transit time within SkyPipeline's Broadband Wireless Network over a calendar month of 70ms or less. The average network latency is measured as the average of 15-minute samples taken throughout the month -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP? As long as you get static ip it should be okay. Others may complain about the terminology you are using, since DSL is a connection method and so is satellite so I'm presuming you are talking about satellite for high speed connectivity. There will be latency but it shouldn't
Re: Defrag
Title: Message yeah yeah - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 8:19 PM Subject: RE: Defrag Don't ya love Incredimail? Wanna help me code it for MAPI? -Original Message-From: Maggie Whitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Defrag *ROTHFLMAO!!! Oh, to be a fly on the wall today! ---Original Message--- From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Date: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:34:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defrag Dear lord, forgiving father, please forgive this poor soul and protect us from the dark clouds of hellfire and brimstone that are looming above.May god help you Thomas Cross...-Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DefragWTF???-Original Message-From: Thomas Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DefragThe person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise toExchange. The message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groupsyou may have with this persons email address. You may do this by deletingthe person's email address and then add them back to your lists or groups byselecting the person's email address from the Novell GroupWise Address Book.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm. IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: For Kevin Miller
Try job hunting in the Houston area :( - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:40 AM Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Point -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I thought you were talking about HP??? ;-) -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002 15:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Yep, you'll have some highly skilled people taking those 40K jobs -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Wait til HP lays off the 10-15,000. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller He's right, that is the market today. Which, if you are an IT individual really sucks. I have talked with recruiters and they salaries overall are down 25%. I don't think the market will really ever pick back up to the point that it was. It is now too flooded with IT wannabes with dollar signs in their eyes. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Not that I've seen. Right now, they want certs, and they want experience, and they want to pay as little as possible. And they'll be able to find that person. I've talked to a couple of recruiters who are seeing resumes from IT folks formerly making $70-$80k applying for $40k jobs. DHL announced they were opening an IT center out here, and supposedly got about 5 thousand resumes for about 50 positions. Yesterday I heard from someone that had over 700 resumes for a position. Some company that is apparently doing a very large w2k migration has been rejecting experienced NT4-w2k migration people with certs because they hadn't worked on large enough migrations. Someday, the economy will come back, and all the underpaid folks will jump to better paying jobs. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Do hiring people still talk about the T shape candidate. This doesn't refer to their physical shape although I guess it might. It refers to the fact that mostly recruiters want a guy with a broad experience of different technologies with in-depth knowledge of one or maybe two technologies. Just wundrin' coz it was all the rage when I left college (but that was some time ago now!). Kevin -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002 14:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Definitely agree on the market plays a factor, no question...but overall a kid coming out of school expecting to make that amount is a bit ridiculous -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Earlier someone mentioned a story about a kid saying that 60-90K was too low for OCPs, and he thought the kid was naive. Although I do agree that many kids go in with much higher $$ thoughts these days, instead of the love of protocols (JK), I don't think that 60-90K is all that high either. It all depends on your market, experience, and abilities. Market is a huge factor. I was offered a job that paid 3 times what I make here, simply due to market differences. Keep in mind that I make about $4.25/hour here on the Tex-Mex border though...jk -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller He was an IBM Global Services guy and knew Cobol like he wrote the language. During Y2K, they would pay anyone who could write code some serious cake. The reason that the CIO's and CTO's make the $300k - $600k kind of money is due to all the medical care they need to have after having the lobotomy and spine removal surgeries. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller Well, where are these high paying jobs at. I'm underpaid! I want some of that cheese! :o) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Re: For Kevin Miller
Title: For Kevin Miller *LMAO!!! - Original Message - From: Paul Green To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:09 PM Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller I got him certified in UCC+WCA. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:08 AMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: For Kevin MillerSubject: For Kevin Miller Would you mind enlightening us on what all that crap is after your name? Is that just a jab at the "certified" world, or are those real? I can not find anything on them in Google. (I had 2 minutes to spare to look) TIA List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
